Do we really need to learn all the so-called formulas you're showing us at the beginning of the video? how am I supposed to know which one to use and learn all of them by heart
I have a test tomorrow on all this stuff, I watched a few of your videos and went from a confidence level of 0 to a confidence level of 100, thank you so much!
I'm struggling in Calculus II and find your videos very helpful. Thanks. Why do I get a different answer when I do a u substitution with the same things but at 4:01?
How come in the first problem you only used the trig identity once? And why the middle function? Is there a specific reason for these things? Thank You
Can you do something like integral [(cosx)^6][(sinx)^6]dx? I'm being asked this on a practice exam, and I realize there's power reduction formulas out there...but in all honesty, how would I be able to memorize every single power reduced form for cosx or sinx (greater than powers of 2)? Is there a systematic way to do this?
Mr Patrick I want to make some correction in your solution and it is that if you had substituted tan x with u in the 3rd step to make it (1-u^2). and then substitute dU in place of sec^2 dx. It would be much easier. Anyways, your videos are helpful and I want to thank you for that.
@patrickJMT he is actually right right on the 3rd step you could have just used u substitution lol since a sec^2x is present . execellent videos as always lol
yeah i just did (1+tan^2x)sec^2x dx = integral of (1+u^2)du
=u + (1/3)u^3 + C. easier
BUT, when i went on wolframalpha and typed this problem in...it gave a totally different answer. It used the reduction formula...can anyone tell me why that is?
wouldn't it have been easier just to leave the (1+tan^2x) unexpanded and did a u substitution from there (1+u^2)du and integrate? (saves one step) 5stars JMT!
I don't think that would have worked because you need to isolate you sec²x in order to define the problem in terms of u. By letting u immediately your sec²x is still attached to the equation. You may get the same answer but it is mathematically incorrect.
Why didn't you just let u=tanx in the third step, and the derivative of tanx would be (secx)^2 which we have. And the answer would be x + (tanx)^3/3??
@patrickJMT I think what he means is to use the U- sub method before you distributed the sec^2 onto the (1+tan^2). So u=tanx, du= sec^2, so S (1+u^2)(du), then integrate to get U^3/3 then swtich it back to Tan^3/3.
@MATHGEEK1989 I get what u mean. I also did it this way. I didn't multiply out (1+(tan x)^2) with (sec x)^2 before letting u=tanx and it also gives me x+ 1/3*(tan x)^3... I'm guessing your method is correct but i'm a bit confused as well...
@MATHGEEK1989 I thought that the answer for this questions is x + tan^3/3 though, unless geometrically or algebrically are the same answer with your results in the video. Any way as always u are superp online teacher !
Do we really need to learn all the so-called formulas you're showing us at the beginning of the video? how am I supposed to know which one to use and learn all of them by heart
Axloooo 8 hours ago
I have a test tomorrow on all this stuff, I watched a few of your videos and went from a confidence level of 0 to a confidence level of 100, thank you so much!
SN1P3ALLSN1P3RS 3 days ago
thanks to you i will pass college
kkkasha01 1 week ago 3
@kkkasha01 ha! hang in there
patrickJMT 1 week ago
I'm struggling in Calculus II and find your videos very helpful. Thanks. Why do I get a different answer when I do a u substitution with the same things but at 4:01?
laurenclark31 2 weeks ago
your integrals become more like "S" as the video progresses = ]
ICarnag3I 3 weeks ago
Thanks Patrick, your the type of people that make a real difference in the world. Great job mate.
Cowboys2SB 3 weeks ago 3
@Cowboys2SB just doin' what i can
patrickJMT 3 weeks ago 2
How come in the first problem you only used the trig identity once? And why the middle function? Is there a specific reason for these things? Thank You
HouseMuzik4Life93 2 months ago
When you reach reach the integral of (1+tan^2 x)(sec^2 x) at 3:59 could you take u=tanx and then get integral of (1 + u^2)du?
Mogon11 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have IPHONE or IPAD and you want to calculate integrals check out this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IF YOU HAVE AN IPHONE OR IPAD AND YOU WANT TO CALCULATE INTEGRALS CHECK OUT THIS APP:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
anaxarte 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have IPHONE or IPAD and you want to calculate integrals check out this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IF YOU HAVE AN IPHONE OR IPAD AND YOU WANT TO CALCULATE INTEGRALS CHECK OUT THIS APP:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
anaxarte 4 months ago
@IWANTHOTDOG Actually... thats a real good idea...
Barbarian74 5 months ago
In the last example doesnt the u subsitution suppose to be tan^2x instead of tanx?
lilhud100 7 months ago
This might be a dumb question, but at 4:00
Why cant you just take u of tan^2 x and get its du cancel out with the sec^2 x term?
robdog979 8 months ago
@robdog979 because the derivative of tan^2(x) is 2sec^2(x)tan(x)
ronniemonnie 3 weeks ago
Can you do integral of Cos^4xdx?
lobsidedballs 9 months ago
GRACIAS ME AYUDÓ BASTANTE=D
AnDyCls 9 months ago
What about products of cos^2x and tan^3x?
JaoquinQ 11 months ago
@IWANTHOTDOG If only physics was this simple
Ayplus 1 year ago
I'ma have my test on thursday... x.x~~~ on all integral stufff.. wish me luck :D
Your videos are very helpful, cover most questions and the course.
Is it k to make requests for problems in case i have trouble wtih them?
ballermanz 1 year ago
I bet at 5:15 you felt clever writing out that u with parenthesis and and underscore.
tacopeut 1 year ago
Can you do something like integral [(cosx)^6][(sinx)^6]dx? I'm being asked this on a practice exam, and I realize there's power reduction formulas out there...but in all honesty, how would I be able to memorize every single power reduced form for cosx or sinx (greater than powers of 2)? Is there a systematic way to do this?
NeoXC 1 year ago
@NeoXC Oops, I meant to say the integral [(cosx)^6 - (sinx)^6]dx
NeoXC 1 year ago
cheers from UMBC!!!!...ur the best
towch1 1 year ago
Simply, you are the best Patrick! I got a full mark in the Calculus II quiz because of your videos! :D
PhotoshopBro 1 year ago 13
@PhotoshopBro congrats : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago
Mr Patrick I want to make some correction in your solution and it is that if you had substituted tan x with u in the 3rd step to make it (1-u^2). and then substitute dU in place of sec^2 dx. It would be much easier. Anyways, your videos are helpful and I want to thank you for that.
hassancheetah 1 year ago 10
@hassancheetah you are probably right, i take the scenic route on a couple of problems!
patrickJMT 1 year ago 4
@patrickJMT he is actually right right on the 3rd step you could have just used u substitution lol since a sec^2x is present . execellent videos as always lol
1matth3w1 11 months ago
@hassancheetah I was thinking the same thing. LOL Makes it easy, but then again, new ideas aint bad for ya ;)
dj2can 1 year ago
omg so helpful! thank u so much!
mzzchunsa 1 year ago
thank you sooo much! holy crap i was stuck on this problem for ages!
2Luke 1 year ago
@IWANTHOTDOG agreed man, physics is killing me right now haha
Cybernetic 2 years ago
thank you.
shamzahm 2 years ago
Calculus is fun.
MomosReel 2 years ago 3
well done again, thank you, ur a lefty homie
teasonmeow 2 years ago
yeah i just did (1+tan^2x)sec^2x dx = integral of (1+u^2)du
=u + (1/3)u^3 + C. easier
BUT, when i went on wolframalpha and typed this problem in...it gave a totally different answer. It used the reduction formula...can anyone tell me why that is?
hkpopfan4lif3 2 years ago
@hkpopfan4lif3 Yeah I was wondering why he didnt stop there.
Shenzinator 2 years ago
errr du=sec²(x) dx
kashiark 2 years ago 2
for the second problem, you could just set u=tan(x) and du=sec²(x) seems easier
kashiark 2 years ago 6
I've got my other original sec² hanging out there... just chillin' out.
It's so funny :P
Physicsandmaths 2 years ago 22
wouldn't it have been easier just to leave the (1+tan^2x) unexpanded and did a u substitution from there (1+u^2)du and integrate? (saves one step) 5stars JMT!
fandennis 2 years ago 5
I don't think that would have worked because you need to isolate you sec²x in order to define the problem in terms of u. By letting u immediately your sec²x is still attached to the equation. You may get the same answer but it is mathematically incorrect.
DiscoOnRocks 2 years ago
I'm not sure what you mean. It is just like the other problem he did.
int (1+tan^2x)sec^2x dx = int (1+u^2)du =
u+u^3/3 +C. It checks out.
mitchyd89 2 years ago 2
I meant to reply to discoOnRocks but it put it up here...idky
mitchyd89 2 years ago
Yea that works, i did in my head while he was doing it the other way. So yea you could skin a cat in more than one way lol
sjb167 2 years ago
thanks man.
ElBrillante4 3 years ago
how do you integrate a product of sines and tangents?
calvinhobbesliker2 3 years ago
I'd guess break the tan into sin/cos and work from there. I'd go with u substitution.
delhigod 3 years ago 2
in step 3 why did u distribute? can't u just let u=tanx du=sec^2x and then it would give
u (u^2+1) du to integrate ??? i dont understand why substitution is necessary
dreamonlittleman 3 years ago
give u* you
dreamonlittleman 3 years ago
can u find the int of sin^6
sakibalmahmud 3 years ago
it would be very tedious! you would have to write it (sin^2)^3 use identity, expand, and use the identity some more!
patrickJMT 3 years ago 2
@patrickJMT
oh please do: sin^6+tan^8, c'mon one time pleeeeeeeeeaaaase?? (O)_(O)'
julesickdrums 1 year ago
There's a quick fix formula for these type of integrals
1. Int(cos^n(x)sin(x) dx) = -cos^(n+1)/(n+1) +C
2. Int(sin^n(x)cos(x) dx) = sin^(n+1)/(n+1) +C
3. Int(tan^n(x)sec^2(x) dx) = tan(n+1)/(n+1) +C
These are just some rules i picked up from my high school teacher to make life easier during exams.
ozakigw 3 years ago
Before you distributed the sec(x) a little after the 4 minute mark.
goosefrabbas 3 years ago
Why didn't you just let u=tanx in the third step, and the derivative of tanx would be (secx)^2 which we have. And the answer would be x + (tanx)^3/3??
MATHGEEK1989 3 years ago
i did let u = tan(x), right? i am confused... not sure where the problem is...
patrickJMT 3 years ago
@patrickJMT I think what he means is to use the U- sub method before you distributed the sec^2 onto the (1+tan^2). So u=tanx, du= sec^2, so S (1+u^2)(du), then integrate to get U^3/3 then swtich it back to Tan^3/3.
EatShanklish 1 year ago
no, cause u = tan(x) so u get the same answer i got : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago 2
i agree with mathgeek, but either way works. Recognizing patterns and which roads to take is a very valuable skill in mathematics.
DMAlivenow 3 years ago
@MATHGEEK1989 I get what u mean. I also did it this way. I didn't multiply out (1+(tan x)^2) with (sec x)^2 before letting u=tanx and it also gives me x+ 1/3*(tan x)^3... I'm guessing your method is correct but i'm a bit confused as well...
ultimaweap12 1 year ago
@MATHGEEK1989 I thought that the answer for this questions is x + tan^3/3 though, unless geometrically or algebrically are the same answer with your results in the video. Any way as always u are superp online teacher !
jay2yosi 1 year ago