Actually pay attention next time and you'll realize there are no continuity fails or plot holes. They deliberately did certain things in first class to make you idiots talk about it.
Yes, X-Men: First Class. It had better writing. Better Direction. Bigger PLOT HOLES!! Watch the first 3 movies then watch First Class. You will see what I mean.
@runyon04 ..continuity fails..bryan singer said first class is a preqaul to the first two x men movies he directed..so yea this is a huge error..why didnt they just call it a reboot??
@jsupermax First Class deliberately ignored what was established in these three films because they needed a familiar character for the fans to connect with. Apparently, FOX believes Magneto and Xavier cannot hold a film on their own.
@parrotcreek here are a few other things i noticed... if shaw is dead how is he in the cameo? (could it be some sort of first idea on what first class was gonna be?), the beast was xaviers student but in the movie he was an ally (at least who doesn't understand the series would say he'd become one of the schools teachers though on the other hand he was taught to use his abilities in the movie but i don't think that makes him a student of the institute)
@ralfcaetano X- First Class is actually said to be a prequel, but also a reboot of the series, so thats why there are all these issues with continuity.
@chefstevekirsch Technically they can rectify this and connect it to this series. Remember, in the comics, Beast had taken serums to had his animal form. It's like one of those twenty-four hour things.
for the people who want to question continuity, in this scene it never said "Sebastian" Shaw and in Wolverine, they never called that diamond chick "Emma". So to be fair, nothing was EVER set in stone sense full-names were never officially mentioned until First Class.
@y2johnnie ur really stupid... x-men have been around for longer then u have prob been alive since ur making a comment like that...hank mccoy has always and will always be beasts name.. xmen were first created in 1963... and in the first comics beasts name was always hank mccoy.. so yes..... his name was always set in stone... you think they made up emma? if so just dnt even bother replying to this.. -_- like really just dnt even respond if u think there names werent set in stone from the start
@Fartmastergb - i actually haven't been on here in a while so i know i'm bout 6 months late to your comment but before you start calling people "stupid" you should READ the comment i originally wrote. I never said anything about the characters in the comics. I was PURELY talking about the movies. I even said "in this scene". So hopefully in the past 6 months you've learned to read people's comments fully and not bring up points that weren't even mentioned.
Also wasn't Gambit mentioned somewhere in X2, i read that his name was listed in the computer database Mistique gained acess to. I don't think it would be a continuity error, it actualy makes sense based on the events of Origins Wolvering.
Yes the timeline is all messed up. But to be fair, when the very first X-men movie was written, they had no idea that there would be sequels. Sure they hoped, but they couldn't count on it. So they wanted to at least mention Hank McCoy, since he was one of the original X-men.
like Emma Frost being young on X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and then in First class she's all grown up, or professor X at the end being old, or a young Scott Summers too, or even Sabertooth as Wolverine's brother and he's not hairy and acting like a total animal... you know, just like we see it in the very first X-Men movie
@poLMnts oh the emma we see was not actually emma frost[they never call her that]but a character based on her and sabertooth losses his memory but other than that,yea its messed up
This is one of those stupid hollywood errors. In First Class we see Hank turn into Beast, but 30 years later, not only hasn't he aged, he still holds his human form....... is it really THAT fucking hard for Hollywood to THINK before writing a script?
Consistency errors GALORE!!!! but I still enjoy the original trilogy... I mean c'mon y,all ... Prior to nolan's batman, x2 was probably the best comic film made. I'm looking forward to first class 2
Fuck the first four films, I'm taking X-men First Class as the new official movie timeline, since it had better writing, better direction and a better plot. Acting was on parr in places (Mcavoy and Fassbender were just as good as Stewart and Mckellen, respectively), so I have no preference in terms of acting and casting. But I came away from First Class wanting to immediately watch it again.
@TheRandyChimp i cannot agree with this more. i was so upset at the plot inconsistencies from the first four movies, but this one was fantastic. it wasn't cheesy and didn't jack up the plotline. i wish this is how the whole film series had started in the first place.
@TheRandyChimp Like it or not - I actually think all of the X-Men movies are within the same timeline. Don't get me wrong - X-Men: First Class is my favorite X-Men movie as well BY FAR. I wish they could've done the other ones so much better (Rouge in the three first one is just awful). But I do think they try to keep it within the same timeline all together. I mean, Wolverine made a cameo here, still played by Hugh Jackman.
@kurvos But cameo's don't mean anything, they're there to make the audience go "Hey, look, theres so and so!" It didn't add anything to the story.
First Class changes things for the original films (Mystique has no problem just killing Xavier in the first film, even though according to first class, she loved him). I'm sticking with my guns, imo, First Class is a new beginning. You can think what you want though, you're entitled to your opinion :)
@TheRandyChimp It's not a matter of opinion. Lots of people realize they did try to make this into a prequel. They even used the exact same WW2 footage again from the first X-Men movie with the young Magneto. Not to mention, Mystique looks the same.
I really do wish there would be a chance this means they will start all over... but I really doubt it, I'm afraid. Especially as they will release that movie Wolverine soon. And Mystique doesn't mind to kill anyone in the 3 first movies. She's grown.
@TheRandyChimp No, it's the exact same identical footage. I've checked both movies - there is no difference. Beast kinda looks the same, but is a lot younger.
Look... you might be right; I don't think I can go against it too much. But continuity errors happens in canon stuff as well to the already established stuff. And the movie do seem to do it's best to keep itself within the same canon. Just look at Xavier's house/school. Not saying I am not supporting a franchise reboot, though.
@TheRandyChimp It's a different actor AFTER that footage from the first movie, yes. But the first footage was of Brett Morris... then when they where in that office where the mother was shot; it's that Bill Milner kid.
@kurvos For gods sake, it's not the same footage! It was a recreation! It's been mentioned everywhere the it's a recreation. The actors for his mother and father are different. The actor playing magneto is different. You get full on frontal face shots, it'd be pretty fucking stupid if it kept switching back and forth between actors!
@TheRandyChimp Alright then - I've might have just been mistaken, as the footage is almost identical. However, this makes one fact much stronger - this is indeed a prequel to the first movie.
@TheRandyChimp If it wasn't a prequel - they wouldn't make the footage identical. If it was a rebooting, they would have done something new. This isn't to pay "homage", as much as both you and I would love if it was just that simple - which I am very afraid it is most likely not.
But look - you might be right. No idea. Like I said - I want them to do Rouge right... I really hated that bitch in the three first movies.
@TheRandyChimp ... well; either it's a prequel to the three first movies, or it's a reboot of the franchise. There isn't anything between that, captain.
@kurvos How do you know? I'm a film and tv student, I've looked into this, you can have a film series seperate from other films based on the same characters, that isn't a reboot.
@TheRandyChimp No - that is a prequel in that case. I'm studying and working to one day myself become a movie director - I'm not an idiot myself either.
@kurvos I never said you were an idiot, I was just informing you of why I'm saying what I'm saying. There are more possibilities in film-making than prequels and reboots.
@TheRandyChimp I've actually looked up info about X-Men: First Class. In fact, it IS a prequel to the two first movies... but as for the third movie and Wolverine - it ignores them, AKA reboots all the ideas from them. In fact, I personally think it is only a prequel to the first movie; as it IS ignoring stuff from the second movie as well. I would've liked a fresh start myself though, where we would get to see Rouge for instance as she should be. Not to mention, Nightcrawler personality wise.
@kurvos If we're going to go for simplified definitions, it's a total reboot. Magnetos real last name is spelt differently than in the original trilogy, the relationships between characters are different, etc.
@TheRandyChimp The director according to IMDB claims First Class to be a prequel to the first two X-Men movies while ignoring the rest. But if this really IS a reboot - I still want to plead them to make new versions of X-Men characters they've done wrong in the past. Especially Rouge.
@kurvos It's rogue, not rouge. Rouge would be pronounced "rooje". Just a heads up.
I don't care about the first four films, as i said in my first comment. First Class, for me, is a new start. As in, I'll watch these for the characters in them, and I won't make links to the original films.
@TheRandyChimp It's not easy to spell stuff correctly always when english is my second language. :P But thanks.
And I wasn't saying that. Could you at least TRY to follow me? I'm saying I hope they will reinvent all the mutants from before. Or well, some of them (Wolverine is good as he is). But Rogue, Nightcrawler, Angel, Jean Grey, Cyclops and so on. This is a chance for them to make characters like these more interesting and well developed.
@kurvos That's sort of what I mean. When I watched first class, I didn't link characters I saw to the first three films, I saw them as their own entities. So basically, if they did introduce Rogue, Nightcrawler, Angel, etc, I'm hoping they'd all be different than in the original trilogy and it's subsiquent Wolverine spin-off. I'm agreeing with you.
@TheRandyChimp You know; I get the feeling it would have been interesting to talk to you through PM. :) I do have to admit though; I am not as educated about the X-Men as I wish I was. I am mostly educated with Batman when it comes to superhero stuff. XP But I am so motivated to learn so much more about X-Men as well. :D
@colompool97 There's also a mistake about Professor X. In First Class He gets his legs paralyzed in the end but when he appears in X- Men Origins, he's stands on his foot.
Really, these movies are made by people that have the money and read/write screenplays. Fans that normally know the actual story line don't make the final decisions. And so, you end up with mistakes like this. Either way, everyone starts geeking out when they see this... Just realize it's a mistake and that the producers/editors love it when you notice it.
I found Ant Man in the X-men 3! Logan, and covers his head, because Jean is sending him a message, then he kneels down in front of Charles Xavior's Stone, and then you see an Ant walk across Wolverine's shoulder!
Guys if you're really taking Beast's lack of fur seriously in this tiny insignificant clip which was only something for the fans to notice, then I should remind you that Beast used to have a holographic watch or something at some point in the comics that made him look human when he was out in public, so just think of this scene as him using that.
@TheStealthX At the end of X2 doesn't Prof X take the X Men to the Oval Office to talk to the President about mutant rights or something? That means that before that Beast used the holographic watch as a disguise to join politics and revealed his true nature and came out of hiding as a mutant.
@ACira93 Hmm, yeah, that makes a bit of sense. I just figured that since he was in the council in the third movie, then he would have been accepted for being a mutant, and therefore would have no reason for the watch.
@ACira93 I just assumed he had a close friend who impersonates Henry McCoy for public appearances, until X3 where Hank is more comfortable appearing himself.
The holo-watch is a gimmick that has been reused in comics for decades, its been used by Kurt (and was made especially famous in the X-Men Evolution cartoon) and also by the Thing from F4 for a brief time.
Hank had a stint in the 80s where he reverted back to his human appearance (with big hands and feet and blue head hair), and I'm not sure whether that was a holowatch or a serum he made
Its only a cameo tho no need to look to much into it :)
@rayblack2004 no its not, its a prequel, Bryan Singer said they were taking some liberties with the timeline and almost all the trailers and a lot of the posters have referenced the original movies (such as magnetos helmet and prof x's wheelchair from the original trilogy) which they wouldnt do if it was a reboot. Plus theyre making another Wolverine film and Hugh Jackman's still playing Wolverine, if they rebooted X-Men they'd make a Wolverine film with a different actor.
@OneDeviousBastard Because it before the first four films. Put it this way, you know how x-men has different comics like astonishing and uncahnny? The film is just like that except its a prequel
so he goes from blue and furry and catlike in first class, to normal human in X-2 to blue skins and fur yet still somewhat human looking in X-3. The continuity of these movies in confusing the hell out of. If fans of the films notice how to the creators miss it.
This was a cool cameo. But now because of how Beast's and Shaw's story is in X-Men: First Class, this whole little scene will be out of canon now with the film series
dumbest cameo of all time! i can't believe some people want beast to look like this plain and boring Bruce Campbell reject in the new "First Class" film. I'm glad they made him blue and putting him in this cameo was a huge mistake. the beast character wasn't interesting to me until he mutated into the blue beast...that's not beast, that's bruce campbell!!
@DeadAssassinGuild wtf do u have against bruce campbell huh? and to educate u, the guy playing beast in this movie is Steve Bacic, not bruce campbell!!!!
beast wasnt always blue and furry, he used to be just big and agile, he tried making a cure for mutancy and it wound up mutating him even further. read the comics before you comment.
@bassbella69 this makes no sense tho, its like they dont even care about the xmen movies: in first class beast changes to his blue and furry form, and shaw dies.... now, beast i can explain (holographic disguise used all the time in the comics), but shaw? did they even remember that they put him in here?
@loktono Probably not. I'm just taking the first three movies out of continuity now and hope they continue with their own, because first class was awesome.
@loktono Mystique? But I agree with Bassbella. I think First Class is in a game all their own now. It was one of the best movie's I've ever seen. I hope they continue it. xD
I never noticed that before. (btw batman is the best hero ever. Deal with it lol)
Redrobin1301 2 months ago
that man's not beast! watch xmen first class
TheBobbleheadboys 4 months ago
ITS JUSTA FREAKING CAMEO PEOPLE. SEBASTIAN SHAWS IN THAT SCENE TOO. BUT ITS A CAMEO. thanks for uploadn though
youngboysnation 4 months ago
sweet
Thanks man didn't remember that from when I first saw the film
MrNuts70 5 months ago
nice catch
MsDead90 5 months ago
im sorry macavoy was good but stewart looked more like the xmen tas prof x lol
vengfulvalo 5 months ago
Actually pay attention next time and you'll realize there are no continuity fails or plot holes. They deliberately did certain things in first class to make you idiots talk about it.
SwimmaLbC 5 months ago
Yes, X-Men: First Class. It had better writing. Better Direction. Bigger PLOT HOLES!! Watch the first 3 movies then watch First Class. You will see what I mean.
runyon04 5 months ago
@runyon04 ..continuity fails..bryan singer said first class is a preqaul to the first two x men movies he directed..so yea this is a huge error..why didnt they just call it a reboot??
usernameDOGS 5 months ago
Yo no la vi a esa escena, esta distraido mirando a Mystique.
SniperMagnum22 6 months ago
Maybe that was just Mystique again?
Crazd22 6 months ago
sooo first class........
jsupermax 6 months ago
@jsupermax First Class deliberately ignored what was established in these three films because they needed a familiar character for the fans to connect with. Apparently, FOX believes Magneto and Xavier cannot hold a film on their own.
Scoonertuna 6 months ago 2
That's so cool! I never caught that, thanks!
Fillionfan400 7 months ago
Love it. I mention Beast in one my new raps on profile come to think of it..
Please check it out if you'd be so kind! Much love.
NemoNine1 7 months ago
Yeah I remember that! I loved that movie alot so it took me a while to see it but I did finally.
sweetheart14879 7 months ago
rumor is that x4 is on the way and it's based on first class (please don't attack me if it's a lie it's only what i've read around here)
ralfcaetano 7 months ago
i'm confused... in x men first class he's already "the beast" ironically the movie involves sebastien shaw...
ralfcaetano 7 months ago
@ralfcaetano yup, they have a tough time keeping age, looks, experieces and etc in right chronological order.
parrotcreek 7 months ago
@parrotcreek here are a few other things i noticed... if shaw is dead how is he in the cameo? (could it be some sort of first idea on what first class was gonna be?), the beast was xaviers student but in the movie he was an ally (at least who doesn't understand the series would say he'd become one of the schools teachers though on the other hand he was taught to use his abilities in the movie but i don't think that makes him a student of the institute)
ralfcaetano 7 months ago
@ralfcaetano X- First Class is actually said to be a prequel, but also a reboot of the series, so thats why there are all these issues with continuity.
chefstevekirsch 7 months ago
@chefstevekirsch but why are they doing that if they're continuing the original x men series? :s
ralfcaetano 7 months ago
@chefstevekirsch Technically they can rectify this and connect it to this series. Remember, in the comics, Beast had taken serums to had his animal form. It's like one of those twenty-four hour things.
Scoonertuna 6 months ago
he looks so skinny in first class and now hes kinda fat
Toxin1241 8 months ago
continuity errors galore thanks to first class. IT IS AWESOME
Akkadianvolcano 8 months ago 2
for the people who want to question continuity, in this scene it never said "Sebastian" Shaw and in Wolverine, they never called that diamond chick "Emma". So to be fair, nothing was EVER set in stone sense full-names were never officially mentioned until First Class.
y2johnnie 8 months ago
Comment removed
Fartmastergb 8 months ago
Comment removed
Fartmastergb 8 months ago
@y2johnnie ur really stupid... x-men have been around for longer then u have prob been alive since ur making a comment like that...hank mccoy has always and will always be beasts name.. xmen were first created in 1963... and in the first comics beasts name was always hank mccoy.. so yes..... his name was always set in stone... you think they made up emma? if so just dnt even bother replying to this.. -_- like really just dnt even respond if u think there names werent set in stone from the start
Fartmastergb 8 months ago
@Fartmastergb - i actually haven't been on here in a while so i know i'm bout 6 months late to your comment but before you start calling people "stupid" you should READ the comment i originally wrote. I never said anything about the characters in the comics. I was PURELY talking about the movies. I even said "in this scene". So hopefully in the past 6 months you've learned to read people's comments fully and not bring up points that weren't even mentioned.
y2johnnie 2 months ago
Also wasn't Gambit mentioned somewhere in X2, i read that his name was listed in the computer database Mistique gained acess to. I don't think it would be a continuity error, it actualy makes sense based on the events of Origins Wolvering.
priceman141 8 months ago
damn dr shaw even sounds like kevin bacon
callmemrgrimm 8 months ago
Yes the timeline is all messed up. But to be fair, when the very first X-men movie was written, they had no idea that there would be sequels. Sure they hoped, but they couldn't count on it. So they wanted to at least mention Hank McCoy, since he was one of the original X-men.
jrvenice1999 8 months ago
X-Men movies are so fucked up in their timelines
like Emma Frost being young on X-Men Origins: Wolverine, and then in First class she's all grown up, or professor X at the end being old, or a young Scott Summers too, or even Sabertooth as Wolverine's brother and he's not hairy and acting like a total animal... you know, just like we see it in the very first X-Men movie
poLMnts 8 months ago
@poLMnts oh the emma we see was not actually emma frost[they never call her that]but a character based on her and sabertooth losses his memory but other than that,yea its messed up
Toxin1241 8 months ago
@Toxin1241
i think you're right, nothing says that she's emma :O
poLMnts 8 months ago
@poLMnts Thing is nobody cares about X-Men Origins Wolverine or X3. As far as I'm concerned, they were never made.
DoctorWeeTodd 8 months ago
This is one of those stupid hollywood errors. In First Class we see Hank turn into Beast, but 30 years later, not only hasn't he aged, he still holds his human form....... is it really THAT fucking hard for Hollywood to THINK before writing a script?
MarkFaust 8 months ago
Consistency errors GALORE!!!! but I still enjoy the original trilogy... I mean c'mon y,all ... Prior to nolan's batman, x2 was probably the best comic film made. I'm looking forward to first class 2
schwoogie78 8 months ago
Fuck the first four films, I'm taking X-men First Class as the new official movie timeline, since it had better writing, better direction and a better plot. Acting was on parr in places (Mcavoy and Fassbender were just as good as Stewart and Mckellen, respectively), so I have no preference in terms of acting and casting. But I came away from First Class wanting to immediately watch it again.
TheRandyChimp 8 months ago 6
@TheRandyChimp i cannot agree with this more. i was so upset at the plot inconsistencies from the first four movies, but this one was fantastic. it wasn't cheesy and didn't jack up the plotline. i wish this is how the whole film series had started in the first place.
clarityofsuchgrace 8 months ago
@TheRandyChimp Like it or not - I actually think all of the X-Men movies are within the same timeline. Don't get me wrong - X-Men: First Class is my favorite X-Men movie as well BY FAR. I wish they could've done the other ones so much better (Rouge in the three first one is just awful). But I do think they try to keep it within the same timeline all together. I mean, Wolverine made a cameo here, still played by Hugh Jackman.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos But cameo's don't mean anything, they're there to make the audience go "Hey, look, theres so and so!" It didn't add anything to the story.
First Class changes things for the original films (Mystique has no problem just killing Xavier in the first film, even though according to first class, she loved him). I'm sticking with my guns, imo, First Class is a new beginning. You can think what you want though, you're entitled to your opinion :)
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp It's not a matter of opinion. Lots of people realize they did try to make this into a prequel. They even used the exact same WW2 footage again from the first X-Men movie with the young Magneto. Not to mention, Mystique looks the same.
I really do wish there would be a chance this means they will start all over... but I really doubt it, I'm afraid. Especially as they will release that movie Wolverine soon. And Mystique doesn't mind to kill anyone in the 3 first movies. She's grown.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos It is a matter of opinion. My opinion is, I'm ignoring the first three films, this is a fresh start in a new generation.
It's not the same footage, it's the same shot set-up, there's a difference.
Mystique looks the same? Beast doesn't. What's up with that, huh?
Wolverines new film has been in development hell, so I don't know what you mean by soon. 2013 isn't soon.
It's not a question of whether Mystiques okay with killing. It's a matter of her relationship with Xavier.
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp No, it's the exact same identical footage. I've checked both movies - there is no difference. Beast kinda looks the same, but is a lot younger.
Look... you might be right; I don't think I can go against it too much. But continuity errors happens in canon stuff as well to the already established stuff. And the movie do seem to do it's best to keep itself within the same canon. Just look at Xavier's house/school. Not saying I am not supporting a franchise reboot, though.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos It really isn't the same footage. The actors are different.
Brett Morris played young magneto in Xmen
Bill Milner played young magneto in first class. Honestly, it's different footage.
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp It's a different actor AFTER that footage from the first movie, yes. But the first footage was of Brett Morris... then when they where in that office where the mother was shot; it's that Bill Milner kid.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos For gods sake, it's not the same footage! It was a recreation! It's been mentioned everywhere the it's a recreation. The actors for his mother and father are different. The actor playing magneto is different. You get full on frontal face shots, it'd be pretty fucking stupid if it kept switching back and forth between actors!
It is a recreation, it's not hard to see that!
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp Alright then - I've might have just been mistaken, as the footage is almost identical. However, this makes one fact much stronger - this is indeed a prequel to the first movie.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos No, it's just the director paying homage to the original films. If it was a prequel, they would have used the exact same footage.
In fact, if it were a prequel, there'd be no need to show the footage, as we've already seen it.
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp If it wasn't a prequel - they wouldn't make the footage identical. If it was a rebooting, they would have done something new. This isn't to pay "homage", as much as both you and I would love if it was just that simple - which I am very afraid it is most likely not.
But look - you might be right. No idea. Like I said - I want them to do Rouge right... I really hated that bitch in the three first movies.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos If rogue turns up, it won't be for a while, the sequel's going to stay with the characters in their youth.
I don't think it's rebooting. I think it's its own series, working off it's own history.
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp ... well; either it's a prequel to the three first movies, or it's a reboot of the franchise. There isn't anything between that, captain.
kurvos 4 months ago
@kurvos How do you know? I'm a film and tv student, I've looked into this, you can have a film series seperate from other films based on the same characters, that isn't a reboot.
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp No - that is a prequel in that case. I'm studying and working to one day myself become a movie director - I'm not an idiot myself either.
kurvos 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kurvos I never said you were an idiot, I was just informing you of why I'm saying what I'm saying. There are more possibilities in film-making than prequels and reboots.
TheRandyChimp 4 months ago
@TheRandyChimp I've actually looked up info about X-Men: First Class. In fact, it IS a prequel to the two first movies... but as for the third movie and Wolverine - it ignores them, AKA reboots all the ideas from them. In fact, I personally think it is only a prequel to the first movie; as it IS ignoring stuff from the second movie as well. I would've liked a fresh start myself though, where we would get to see Rouge for instance as she should be. Not to mention, Nightcrawler personality wise.
kurvos 3 months ago
@kurvos If we're going to go for simplified definitions, it's a total reboot. Magnetos real last name is spelt differently than in the original trilogy, the relationships between characters are different, etc.
TheRandyChimp 3 months ago
@TheRandyChimp The director according to IMDB claims First Class to be a prequel to the first two X-Men movies while ignoring the rest. But if this really IS a reboot - I still want to plead them to make new versions of X-Men characters they've done wrong in the past. Especially Rouge.
kurvos 3 months ago
@kurvos It's rogue, not rouge. Rouge would be pronounced "rooje". Just a heads up.
I don't care about the first four films, as i said in my first comment. First Class, for me, is a new start. As in, I'll watch these for the characters in them, and I won't make links to the original films.
TheRandyChimp 3 months ago
@TheRandyChimp It's not easy to spell stuff correctly always when english is my second language. :P But thanks.
And I wasn't saying that. Could you at least TRY to follow me? I'm saying I hope they will reinvent all the mutants from before. Or well, some of them (Wolverine is good as he is). But Rogue, Nightcrawler, Angel, Jean Grey, Cyclops and so on. This is a chance for them to make characters like these more interesting and well developed.
kurvos 3 months ago
@kurvos That's sort of what I mean. When I watched first class, I didn't link characters I saw to the first three films, I saw them as their own entities. So basically, if they did introduce Rogue, Nightcrawler, Angel, etc, I'm hoping they'd all be different than in the original trilogy and it's subsiquent Wolverine spin-off. I'm agreeing with you.
TheRandyChimp 3 months ago
@TheRandyChimp You know; I get the feeling it would have been interesting to talk to you through PM. :) I do have to admit though; I am not as educated about the X-Men as I wish I was. I am mostly educated with Batman when it comes to superhero stuff. XP But I am so motivated to learn so much more about X-Men as well. :D
kurvos 3 months ago
@kurvos Same. I personally prefer Batman.
TheRandyChimp 3 months ago
@TheRandyChimp Oh? Suddenly, I'm getting curious to talk more with you. ;)
kurvos 3 months ago
@kurvos Lol, we've filled this comment section already. Probably not a good move. :)
TheRandyChimp 3 months ago
@TheRandyChimp Oh? But I've just been sending a PM to you. XD
kurvos 3 months ago
i swear fox needs to get their x men timeline right
cindabx 8 months ago 10
But, according to First Class, he was already furry and Shaw was dead...
SoWachuWan 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@colompool97 There's also a mistake about Professor X. In First Class He gets his legs paralyzed in the end but when he appears in X- Men Origins, he's stands on his foot.
kakhi2008 8 months ago
Comment removed
kakhi2008 8 months ago
omg ppl are actually finding ways this works...plain and simple tey did not anticipate beast and shaws role in x3 and first class.
FunkMasterKRoc 8 months ago
Really, these movies are made by people that have the money and read/write screenplays. Fans that normally know the actual story line don't make the final decisions. And so, you end up with mistakes like this. Either way, everyone starts geeking out when they see this... Just realize it's a mistake and that the producers/editors love it when you notice it.
PileofEarth 8 months ago
Well this is just a middle finger to the new movie.
Charlesperalo 8 months ago
notice how mystique looks at mccoy.. like in the new film wen they have a romantic interest she could be remembering him
BuellerBueller95 9 months ago
I found Ant Man in the X-men 3! Logan, and covers his head, because Jean is sending him a message, then he kneels down in front of Charles Xavior's Stone, and then you see an Ant walk across Wolverine's shoulder!
Thewalkingdeadzombie 10 months ago
Guys if you're really taking Beast's lack of fur seriously in this tiny insignificant clip which was only something for the fans to notice, then I should remind you that Beast used to have a holographic watch or something at some point in the comics that made him look human when he was out in public, so just think of this scene as him using that.
ACira93 10 months ago
@ACira93 True, but then think about this: Why would he need that when, in the third movie, he's on a freaking council as well as being a mutant.
TheStealthX 10 months ago
@TheStealthX At the end of X2 doesn't Prof X take the X Men to the Oval Office to talk to the President about mutant rights or something? That means that before that Beast used the holographic watch as a disguise to join politics and revealed his true nature and came out of hiding as a mutant.
Either that, or suspension of disbelief.
ACira93 9 months ago
@ACira93 Hmm, yeah, that makes a bit of sense. I just figured that since he was in the council in the third movie, then he would have been accepted for being a mutant, and therefore would have no reason for the watch.
TheStealthX 9 months ago
@ACira93 I just assumed he had a close friend who impersonates Henry McCoy for public appearances, until X3 where Hank is more comfortable appearing himself.
Also, wasn't the holo-watch more Kurt's deal?
TheBlairdevil 9 months ago
@TheBlairdevil Could very well be an impersonator.
The holo-watch is a gimmick that has been reused in comics for decades, its been used by Kurt (and was made especially famous in the X-Men Evolution cartoon) and also by the Thing from F4 for a brief time.
Hank had a stint in the 80s where he reverted back to his human appearance (with big hands and feet and blue head hair), and I'm not sure whether that was a holowatch or a serum he made
Its only a cameo tho no need to look to much into it :)
ACira93 9 months ago
@cowmant23 First class is a reboot
rayblack2004 10 months ago
@rayblack2004 no its not, its a prequel, Bryan Singer said they were taking some liberties with the timeline and almost all the trailers and a lot of the posters have referenced the original movies (such as magnetos helmet and prof x's wheelchair from the original trilogy) which they wouldnt do if it was a reboot. Plus theyre making another Wolverine film and Hugh Jackman's still playing Wolverine, if they rebooted X-Men they'd make a Wolverine film with a different actor.
ACira93 10 months ago
@OneDeviousBastard Because it before the first four films. Put it this way, you know how x-men has different comics like astonishing and uncahnny? The film is just like that except its a prequel
iBillcosby 11 months ago
@cowmant23 Thats because first class is not cannon from the first four films...
iBillcosby 11 months ago
@iBillcosby yes it is. And the MacCoy in this scene is just easter egg nothing more.
radar550 10 months ago
this tiny cameo has ruined X-men First class for me. Not Happy!
Evergreenoutsider10 11 months ago
@Evergreenoutsider10 I feel the same. I need an explanation.
thermadyne123 10 months ago
@Evergreenoutsider10 could be a different Dr. McCoy
rayblack2004 10 months ago
so he goes from blue and furry and catlike in first class, to normal human in X-2 to blue skins and fur yet still somewhat human looking in X-3. The continuity of these movies in confusing the hell out of. If fans of the films notice how to the creators miss it.
sarizalite 11 months ago
This was a cool cameo. But now because of how Beast's and Shaw's story is in X-Men: First Class, this whole little scene will be out of canon now with the film series
Zetton199198 1 year ago
@Zetton199198 i know it sucks. i hate how newer movies throw stuff out of canon
thebuckrogers22 1 year ago
dumbest cameo of all time! i can't believe some people want beast to look like this plain and boring Bruce Campbell reject in the new "First Class" film. I'm glad they made him blue and putting him in this cameo was a huge mistake. the beast character wasn't interesting to me until he mutated into the blue beast...that's not beast, that's bruce campbell!!
DeadAssassinGuild 1 year ago
@DeadAssassinGuild wtf do u have against bruce campbell huh? and to educate u, the guy playing beast in this movie is Steve Bacic, not bruce campbell!!!!
thebuckrogers22 1 year ago
Comment removed
DeadAssassinGuild 1 year ago
thats so cool, i never noticed that.
KattZomB 1 year ago
My brother noticed this when me and him first saw the film. :D
C3Z4rtv 1 year ago
Ohhhh I didnt even noticed that -_- smh
jamelpingo 1 year ago
beast wasnt always blue and furry, he used to be just big and agile, he tried making a cure for mutancy and it wound up mutating him even further. read the comics before you comment.
billyspurr 1 year ago
@billyspurr so many people do not read...period.
sad
sabbatha1 1 year ago
@billyspurr
incorrect...follow your own advice and find out what really happened...hint: brand corporation
txcchamp 1 year ago
@txcchamp you talking original or ultimate?
billyspurr 1 year ago
@txcchamp ah yes, I do see that I misspoke, must have gotten a wires crossed. thank you for the lesson in humility.
billyspurr 1 year ago
@billyspurr
lol no biggie
txcchamp 1 year ago
You can also see Gambits name on the computer when Mystique is downloading the Mutant Files.
DasTuefel 2 years ago
in the comic beast didn't have blue fur at first and still had powers so he is still a mutant
ernieball3645 2 years ago
all i know is that he is on tv in the bar scene with mystique
bully190 2 years ago
The clip is mentioned on wikipedia
picklepaul512 2 years ago
One has to wonder how much time was spent watching the movie before that was caught.
Days? Weeks? Who knows.
dkerris 2 years ago
I noticed it the second time I watched it but I never noticed that he was talking to Sebastian Shaw of the Hellfire Club.
hguapkcaj 2 years ago
I love How Bryan Singer was able to incorporate so many characters and still give us a great story!
Scoonertuna 1 year ago
@dkerris i saw the movie once, and i caught that.
kobeuzumaki 1 year ago
...but he's not blue or furry...
mickiew4 2 years ago
It's before he tried to cure himself. He tried to cure himself and something went wrong and turn him into a blue furball
ikedirty318 2 years ago
...not yet...
lol
naetchboy 2 years ago
Comment removed
TiVoCableGuys 2 years ago
he wasn't always blue and furry
icingdeath69 2 years ago 33
@icingdeath69 And now he's blue and furry in the prequel.
j0hnc4mpb3ll 8 months ago
@icingdeath69 yeah but he was blue and furry long before all of this
NORMANHIGH405 8 months ago
@icingdeath69 - But in first class he's blue and furry at the age of like 18 ??
sexysteveontour10 8 months ago
Comment removed
edyoung44 8 months ago
@sexysteveontour10 he can switch back and forth im guessing?
edyoung44 8 months ago
@edyoung44 no,in x2(the novel)its revealed xaviers attack on Mastermind triggered a second mutation causing him to become again for x3
Toxin1241 8 months ago
@icingdeath69 but he was blue and furry way before x2 was supposed to be. he turened blue before magneto turned evil.
logandh2 6 months ago 2
@icingdeath69 then y the hell is he blu and fury in first class?
theXtreme1man 6 months ago
He's actually talking to Dr Shaw as well, as in Sabastian Shaw of the hellfire club.
bassbella69 2 years ago 33
@bassbella69 this makes no sense tho, its like they dont even care about the xmen movies: in first class beast changes to his blue and furry form, and shaw dies.... now, beast i can explain (holographic disguise used all the time in the comics), but shaw? did they even remember that they put him in here?
loktono 8 months ago
@loktono Probably not. I'm just taking the first three movies out of continuity now and hope they continue with their own, because first class was awesome.
bassbella69 8 months ago
@loktono Mystique? But I agree with Bassbella. I think First Class is in a game all their own now. It was one of the best movie's I've ever seen. I hope they continue it. xD
Kaygie0610 8 months ago
@bassbella69 which is now in 2011 a discontinuity error due to X-Men: First Class
X09WARockX09 8 months ago
@bassbella69 shaws a nazi
NORMANHIGH405 8 months ago
@bassbella69 - How do you know ? Lol
sexysteveontour10 8 months ago
@bassbella69 but shaw died in first class
Roockie117 6 months ago
great vid i never noticed that lol
xxxgambitfanxxx 2 years ago