We need a new law about aircraft crashes in the US, which I think should be called Von Kleist's Law,requiring the pilot of an aircraft to ensure that after the aircraft has crashed ,large recognisable sections of the aircraft must be left intact, to be photographed by members of the public.This applies especially to tail sections as not seeing the tail section of the plane, after an aircrash, causes great confusion to some people.
"Where is the wreckage, where is the wreckage on the lawn". Which is more likely. Due to it travelling at 500mph in the opposite direction to the lawn, it didnt bounce back out, more went inside. Or the other option. Its in a cave some place because this was a missile. The fact that people consider one of these more likely should be used as a simple test in a job interview to save time and see how stupid people are.
Wait let me get this right. This man (who has amazing hair by the way) wants the Authorities to release video from INSIDE the pentagon, a critical building relative to secrecy, to prove to some guys with collanders strapped to their heads, that a plane actually hit the Pentagon. Is that right? They are not going to do anything of the sort, nor should they. THAT would be a conspiracy.
Fuck the government! All they do is lie, about EVERYTHING. Thumbs up if you think the federal government is a corrupted group of ninkampoops with nothing but political agendas of their own. This country is shit, nowadays.
@blazingferret,what are you talking about ,tracked by hand.What does this mean,explain.The money has not been recovered,it's been added to americas' black hole.$15 trillion last i heard,all because of a lie = WMD's= wars =Billions for already rich bastards.Now why are you defending them,is your family involved,or are you brainwashed military.
@tontobones "tracked by hand.What does this mean"
Nothing was missing. The whole tracking problem was announced long before 9-11, and explained on the DoD public website long ago:
TInyUrl dot com/7qfv5u2
Quote: "These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time"
Read the whole link. It's not rocket science. Why is this hard to grasp?
The U.S. declared war on Irag to get money. Bush set this all up to try to get the U.S. out of debt, which didn't work. There were no terrorist, the U.S. Government did all of this.
what better way better way to pump up the military budget? what better way to to get bills tike the patriot act passed without too much scrutiny? what better way to paralyze people with fear? what better way to gain control than having it given to you by ignorant sheep?
when your tv tells you to look at the right hand you had better be looking at the left.
@pho20jo "what better way to paralyze people with fear"
The only ones paralyzed with fear are the mindless paranoid morons in the Truthie Cult. But if 9-11 had never happened they'd still be soiling their panties over some other imaginary conspiracy. It's part of their emotional stunting.
@blazingferret,are you fucking stupid,he said it.Now where is it ,it's still missing ,empty head.And ,if you don't tell lies you don't need to remember anything.Check your facts ,patsy
He said it was hard to track by auditors, since their computer systems were incompatible, so a lot of shit had to be tracked by hand. His whole point, if you bothered to listen, was that they needed to upgrade their computer systems so they could talk to each other.
Ignorant morons somehow can't figure this out, and imagine that thieves are now announcing their work on nationwide TV.
@blazingferret,Where is the missing $2.3 TRILLION announced as missing by rumsfeld the day before,on the 10th.The records arent kept where that plane/missile hit the pentagon ,surely.
There is nothing "missing," you ignorant twat. Rumsfeld said that it was hard to track that much money because govt computer systems weren't compatible.
Are you really dense enough to believe that thieves announce their work on nationwide TV?
Yeah, a truthie punk like you probably is that dense.
@JasonVladimir "How do we not have any picture/video footage of a building with the best security money can buy?"
Explain to us why cameras outside the Pentagon would have any effect on security at all? What, exactly, is the threat they would be directed against?
I find it curious that the only idiots who think the Pentagon was some "high security building," like a missile site or a USAF flightline, are clowns who have never been anywhere near the Pentagon, let alone actually gone inside.
My mission was to prove the French wrong, but then i said fuck it im a big gullible idiot like the rest of the people in this country, and agreed with them
so what happened to the people who were on the plan that did not hit the pentagon . the dickhead is showing the evidence and disregarding it. Some people believe anything.
Take these photos and the aircraft debris photos from "Flight 77 and The Pentagon: A Closer Look" video and see just what frame(s) the wreckage showed up.
The more important questions regarding the Pentagon "attack" are:
If, the flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon than WHERE IS IT?!! And what happened to the passengers?!!! Did they crash it somewhere else? Did they assassinate all the passengers and disassembled the plane in bits and pieces making it gone forever?
These are the questions we should try to find answers to...
Actual employees at the pentagon have testified that there was a distinct smell of explosives at the scene of the crime. @ drlilgangsta10 you are a foolish boy, go play outside.
@68sunshinefun "employees at the pentagon have testified that there was a distinct smell of explosives at the scene of the crime"
You're lying piece of shit. ONE guy said he thought he smelled cordite -- which hasn't been used as an artillery propellant since the Korean war (before this clown was born). He's a fool.
Only a moron believes there were explosives, when every large thing was thrown INWARD, like in a crash, instead of blasted OUTWARD, as explosives in missiles would do.
@68sunshinefun "employees at the pentagon have testified that there was a distinct smell of explosives at the scene"
One idiot said he smelled "cordite" -- a statement so stupid as to defy belief, since cordite has been extinct since WW2.
Not one witness out of the 200-300 said they saw a missile. The radar tracks show no missile, only Flt 77, which was spotted at Dulles Airport and followed in to the Pentagon by a military plane.
@drlilgangsta10 so some rims and tires survived , and they could i dentify people , yet the entire plane vaporised ???? where is the plane ??? and the plane damage to the building ? and all the pentagon security footage ? thats you best comment to dispute this video ? sounds fishy to me.
Who said? Some dipshit on Loose Change? There were several TONS of large parts found -- landing gear & struts, wheels, engine parts from a 757, black box, etc -- and their photos are all over the web.
@BlazingFerret There weren't 'several tons of large parts found' there wasn't one surviving black box from the four planes on 9/11, explain that. Black boxes are designed and made to withstand anything, so how did four fail their primary goal on one day when it's never happened before? You don't have to believe the conspiracies but you should think about things rationally.
@EndlessFireStorm "there wasn't one surviving black box from the four planes on 9/11"
Are you going to apologize for lying about this repeatedly, or are you now going to claim that the FAA's posting of the FDR data is some sort of fakery by this giant conspiracy you fantasize about?
Why are you the only one stupid enough to fail to locate the FDR data online?
@BlazingFerret Think of how much smarter you would look if you said something like 'You're wrong, there were black boxes found.' and then given the url of the place to find that information. I will be the first to admit I don't know half of the facts of 9/11. That's why I ask questions.
Instead you resort to name calling as though you were still in fifth grade. I can and do gladly admit when I'm wrong, and am open to all factual information on this subject. But I will question everything.
Think of how much smarter you would look if you actually bothered to research anything instead of making up stupid lies about the black boxes.
The only think you DON'T question is the crackpot bullshit you get from loony websites. There's a big difference between being wrong, and actually LYING THROUGH YOUR TEEETH.
@BlazingFerret the very fact that they claimed that the 2 towers were destroyed by jet fuel remains the basis of my argument, why didn't the pentagon burn down? Why can that book within the earlier scenes exist where it is and not be charred to a crisp.
This whole story is just a story nothing more. The evidence at hand does not persist with the entire scene which we are watching. If jet fuel broke down the 2 towers why not the pentagon?
@Anxiety724 "If jet fuel broke down the 2 towers why not the pentagon?"
Nobody ever said that jet fuel caused the WTC collapse. Jet fuel was only the accelerant; the building contents burned after that. And every engineering & scientific article stated clearly that plane damage AND uncontrolled fires caused the collapse.
@BlazingFerret Then, why was all video evidence of the actual "Crash" confiscated? Even private security camera video.. the feds came in an just took it. Why was the hole at first only 16 feet wide, then later collapsed and made it into the 65-foot hole? How is that possible with a 757?? Jet fuel burns HOT--there shouldn't have been an untouched computer monitor 2 feet from the crash. It would have been melted.. It's all a lie, who's to say what happened, but we know what did not.
@BlazingFerret No, they aren't. Just because there a pictures of "wreckage", you can't just ignore all the other contradictory aspects of the incident.
@TheBingggg "why does this moron not discuss this with a structure engineer, or blast expert? "
Because those guys are too busy laughing their ass off at the idiots who actually believe this conspiracy crap.
That's the reason the Truthie Retards can't find one structural engineer to publish anything refuting the NIST report, nor one demolition expert that believes the twin towers were a demo job.
Every year they trot out some alleged demo expert, who ALWAYS proves to be a complete phony.
Am I missing something here. Surely reporters would have obtained a list of passengers. Did nobody talk to their relatives, attend their funerals. So the crew and all the passengers ID and background life history was artifitialy created and
nobody checked this out? I know the US media is famously subservient but even they would pick up on this.
the fact that people can look at a mock up picture of the size of the plane next to the pentagon and then conclude a plane crashed there is fucking worrying, I watched the BBC that day and they were calling it a small commuter jet (like 12 people plane) then they changed it later on and I assumed it was a mistake and they would change it back to a small plane, when they didn't that was it for me. The big conspiracy people can't handle concerns the media role in it all
I dont believe that 911's field crash, or the WTC were a set up by the government at all... but I have always thought that the pentagon investigation was wrong.........because its so covered up, people cant 'actually' say what happened... be it a conspiracy theory or not, the government may have just told a lie... look at how things are just fine next to the damage... we dont have tech. that can do such things and NOT burn them...
I guess the reason why there are so many videos like this out there is to break thru this mind block people create in their heads in order to protect themselves from a mental breakdown. Like jumping out of an airplane for the first time, the average persons mind blocks out the memory protecting him from overload.
There wasn't a reporter anywhere that day saying there was a sign of a wrecked plane except for the towers. So why do they create this lie in their heads?
Complacency, you can create your own quite feeling of false security.
This is recommended and used by the majority. Its a warm and cozy world created by the subconscious of the weak mind to protect itself from the extreme fear of reality. These people would not know how to handle the truth.
There is nothing that can be done. Even if an investigation should happen, do you think the people in charge at the time wound not use the cant answer that question due to "National Secuity"!! Plus, even if an investigation did happen, it would take years to complete. This has to do with the pipeline in Afghanistan to get it out of Taliban control. Terminate a few that were'nt needed anymore, take away all our rights and freedoms were all accomplished in one day plus many other things.
We need a new law about aircraft crashes in the US, which I think should be called Von Kleist's Law,requiring the pilot of an aircraft to ensure that after the aircraft has crashed ,large recognisable sections of the aircraft must be left intact, to be photographed by members of the public.This applies especially to tail sections as not seeing the tail section of the plane, after an aircrash, causes great confusion to some people.
cwlldoran 4 days ago
"Where is the wreckage, where is the wreckage on the lawn". Which is more likely. Due to it travelling at 500mph in the opposite direction to the lawn, it didnt bounce back out, more went inside. Or the other option. Its in a cave some place because this was a missile. The fact that people consider one of these more likely should be used as a simple test in a job interview to save time and see how stupid people are.
KowBoySpace 2 weeks ago
Wait let me get this right. This man (who has amazing hair by the way) wants the Authorities to release video from INSIDE the pentagon, a critical building relative to secrecy, to prove to some guys with collanders strapped to their heads, that a plane actually hit the Pentagon. Is that right? They are not going to do anything of the sort, nor should they. THAT would be a conspiracy.
KowBoySpace 2 weeks ago
99% of truthers are Muslims,the rest are no muslims but retarded Idiots.Inside Job theory spread by US government to calm down Anti Islam feelings...
mastouris69 1 month ago
great vid! sadly the so called americans cant even see this and not question......please let hope come from somewhere!
scottf78 1 month ago
Fuck the government! All they do is lie, about EVERYTHING. Thumbs up if you think the federal government is a corrupted group of ninkampoops with nothing but political agendas of their own. This country is shit, nowadays.
bushpilot223 1 month ago
@blazingferret,what are you talking about ,tracked by hand.What does this mean,explain.The money has not been recovered,it's been added to americas' black hole.$15 trillion last i heard,all because of a lie = WMD's= wars =Billions for already rich bastards.Now why are you defending them,is your family involved,or are you brainwashed military.
tontobones 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tontobones "tracked by hand.What does this mean"
Nothing was missing. The whole tracking problem was announced long before 9-11, and explained on the DoD public website long ago:
TInyUrl dot com/7qfv5u2
Quote: "These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time"
Read the whole link. It's not rocket science. Why is this hard to grasp?
SpookMSgt 1 month ago
If it was AA77, they certainly would have shown ONE of the videos....sooooo.....
THEY are the ones FORCING us to become therorists of conspiracies. so........
THEY are showing this to you to find out who dares to be brave....
Now turing citizens into suspects as it's goal...
MrNoblemanoflove 1 month ago
@MrNoblemanoflove "THEY are the ones FORCING us to become therorists of conspiracies."
No, your ignorance is doing a fine job of that already.
SpookMSgt 1 month ago
@SpookMSgt
See YT Vid:
9-11 Cheney Rumsfeld Black Operation at Pentagon...15min.
also...Pentagon Attack Papers.... 6:05min
MrNoblemanoflove 1 month ago
The U.S. declared war on Irag to get money. Bush set this all up to try to get the U.S. out of debt, which didn't work. There were no terrorist, the U.S. Government did all of this.
ChilliForaker13 2 months ago
@ChilliForaker13 Dumbass -.- just stfu we lost what 80 billion dollars??? seems like we got alot of money huh?
Reycolombiano999 2 months ago
@ChilliForaker13 "U.S. declared war on Irag to get money"
So explain to us how going to war was going to get us money. And when has that ever happened in our history?
You're an idiot.
BlazingFerret 1 month ago
ferret did you get beaten up by a rabbit,your awful quiet ,empty head
tontobones 2 months ago
what better way better way to pump up the military budget? what better way to to get bills tike the patriot act passed without too much scrutiny? what better way to paralyze people with fear? what better way to gain control than having it given to you by ignorant sheep?
when your tv tells you to look at the right hand you had better be looking at the left.
pho20jo 2 months ago
@pho20jo "what better way to paralyze people with fear"
The only ones paralyzed with fear are the mindless paranoid morons in the Truthie Cult. But if 9-11 had never happened they'd still be soiling their panties over some other imaginary conspiracy. It's part of their emotional stunting.
BlazingFerret 1 month ago
The Govt of the USA did this. It was all planned by Bush. We never had a terrorist Attack. it was just an Excuse to attack Iraq.
Qbano21 2 months ago
haw ferret you any relation to glenn berk or silly o'reilly, ignoranus
tontobones 2 months ago
@blazingferret,are you fucking stupid,he said it.Now where is it ,it's still missing ,empty head.And ,if you don't tell lies you don't need to remember anything.Check your facts ,patsy
tontobones 2 months ago
@tontobones "he said it"
He said it was hard to track by auditors, since their computer systems were incompatible, so a lot of shit had to be tracked by hand. His whole point, if you bothered to listen, was that they needed to upgrade their computer systems so they could talk to each other.
Ignorant morons somehow can't figure this out, and imagine that thieves are now announcing their work on nationwide TV.
BlazingFerret 1 month ago
Good vid, the facts speak!
20pinbaw07 2 months ago
@blazingferret,Where is the missing $2.3 TRILLION announced as missing by rumsfeld the day before,on the 10th.The records arent kept where that plane/missile hit the pentagon ,surely.
tontobones 3 months ago
@tontobones "missing $2.3 TRILLION"
There is nothing "missing," you ignorant twat. Rumsfeld said that it was hard to track that much money because govt computer systems weren't compatible.
Are you really dense enough to believe that thieves announce their work on nationwide TV?
Yeah, a truthie punk like you probably is that dense.
BlazingFerret 2 months ago
It never changes.
A pack of teenage dipshits repeat ridiculous lies they just copy from loony websites, they get their lies shoved up their asses ...
And they run away like a pack of little girls with their tampons on fire.
Not enough intellectual honesty among the 9-11 Pussy Brigade to even admit they were full of shit.
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 3
i try to be a sceptic but it is goddam hard with all this evidence !!!!
galarkongen1 3 months ago
How do we not have any picture/video footage of a building with the best security money can buy?
JasonVladimir 3 months ago
@JasonVladimir "How do we not have any picture/video footage of a building with the best security money can buy?"
Explain to us why cameras outside the Pentagon would have any effect on security at all? What, exactly, is the threat they would be directed against?
I find it curious that the only idiots who think the Pentagon was some "high security building," like a missile site or a USAF flightline, are clowns who have never been anywhere near the Pentagon, let alone actually gone inside.
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 6
Please compare to the worst plane crash in Dutch history:
→ watch?v=RdSopVRYbDk&feature=related (Bijlmerramp, Amsterdam, 1992)
+ Walls collided vertically on one side
+ Both craters aren't nearly as wide as the 757 / 747's wing span
→ In the Bijlmerramp FIRE spread in BOTH directions in the clip from national dutch news tv
→ The crater fully breached the 10 story building at both sides in the Bijlmer
***USA founders of fundamentalism please read Matthew 19:24***
ZionHillCalling 3 months ago
Comment removed
idate629 3 months ago
My mission was to prove the French wrong, but then i said fuck it im a big gullible idiot like the rest of the people in this country, and agreed with them
hazzaisdabombage 3 months ago
My mission was to prove the French wrong, but then I said fuck it, and agreed with them.
alexkills 3 months ago
so what happened to the people who were on the plan that did not hit the pentagon . the dickhead is showing the evidence and disregarding it. Some people believe anything.
gazman50s 3 months ago
The "RED" fire is the most telling of rocket propellant fuel signature.
usmcoth 4 months ago
Take these photos and the aircraft debris photos from "Flight 77 and The Pentagon: A Closer Look" video and see just what frame(s) the wreckage showed up.
usmcoth 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was a missile.
Jackthesmilingblack 4 months ago
did they find the black box?
hutchinson1995 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hutchinson1995 "did they find the black box?"
Yes. the data was posted online by the FAA, and the less-loony conspiracy websites, like PIlots for Truth, have been discussing the data for years.
The pilots of course are too stupid to interpret or understand the data, but they certainly didn't have any trouble finding the FDR data.
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 5
The more important questions regarding the Pentagon "attack" are:
If, the flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon than WHERE IS IT?!! And what happened to the passengers?!!! Did they crash it somewhere else? Did they assassinate all the passengers and disassembled the plane in bits and pieces making it gone forever?
These are the questions we should try to find answers to...
jordan2104 4 months ago
None of the titanium engines were found at any of the sites. The US government claimed that all disintegrated..
ProfitableLifestyles 4 months ago
@ProfitableLifestyles "None of the titanium engines were found at any of the sites"
You just sound stupid when you repeat idiotic lies like this.
Are you claiming that all those photos of engine parts at all three sites are Photoshopped?
Or are you just too stupid to find anything on Google?
BlazingFerret 4 months ago 3
Actual employees at the pentagon have testified that there was a distinct smell of explosives at the scene of the crime. @ drlilgangsta10 you are a foolish boy, go play outside.
68sunshinefun 5 months ago
@68sunshinefun "employees at the pentagon have testified that there was a distinct smell of explosives at the scene of the crime"
You're lying piece of shit. ONE guy said he thought he smelled cordite -- which hasn't been used as an artillery propellant since the Korean war (before this clown was born). He's a fool.
Only a moron believes there were explosives, when every large thing was thrown INWARD, like in a crash, instead of blasted OUTWARD, as explosives in missiles would do.
BlazingFerret 4 months ago 4
Comment removed
TerraUchiha1 3 months ago
@BlazingFerret No, stop right there! You're a fucking liar! It was clearly blasted outward! Yes, like an explosive or missile!
TerraUchiha1 3 months ago
@68sunshinefun "employees at the pentagon have testified that there was a distinct smell of explosives at the scene"
One idiot said he smelled "cordite" -- a statement so stupid as to defy belief, since cordite has been extinct since WW2.
Not one witness out of the 200-300 said they saw a missile. The radar tracks show no missile, only Flt 77, which was spotted at Dulles Airport and followed in to the Pentagon by a military plane.
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 4
theres fucking wheels right on the ground if you look closer at some of the pictures the tires are burnt but the rim is there, dumb lieing old men.
drlilgangsta10 7 months ago 2
@drlilgangsta10 Those are not wheels of a 757. They are cable reels lol.
Look closer.
JasonHarry37 4 months ago
@drlilgangsta10 so some rims and tires survived , and they could i dentify people , yet the entire plane vaporised ???? where is the plane ??? and the plane damage to the building ? and all the pentagon security footage ? thats you best comment to dispute this video ? sounds fishy to me.
supergordon24fan 4 months ago
@supergordon24fan "the entire plane vaporised ?"
Who said? Some dipshit on Loose Change? There were several TONS of large parts found -- landing gear & struts, wheels, engine parts from a 757, black box, etc -- and their photos are all over the web.
BlazingFerret 4 months ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@BlazingFerret There weren't 'several tons of large parts found' there wasn't one surviving black box from the four planes on 9/11, explain that. Black boxes are designed and made to withstand anything, so how did four fail their primary goal on one day when it's never happened before? You don't have to believe the conspiracies but you should think about things rationally.
EndlessFireStorm 3 months ago
@EndlessFireStorm More great points in question.
JasonVladimir 3 months ago
@EndlessFireStorm "there wasn't one surviving black box from the four planes on 9/11"
Are you going to apologize for lying about this repeatedly, or are you now going to claim that the FAA's posting of the FDR data is some sort of fakery by this giant conspiracy you fantasize about?
Why are you the only one stupid enough to fail to locate the FDR data online?
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 3
@BlazingFerret Think of how much smarter you would look if you said something like 'You're wrong, there were black boxes found.' and then given the url of the place to find that information. I will be the first to admit I don't know half of the facts of 9/11. That's why I ask questions.
Instead you resort to name calling as though you were still in fifth grade. I can and do gladly admit when I'm wrong, and am open to all factual information on this subject. But I will question everything.
EndlessFireStorm 3 months ago
@EndlessFireStorm
Think of how much smarter you would look if you actually bothered to research anything instead of making up stupid lies about the black boxes.
The only think you DON'T question is the crackpot bullshit you get from loony websites. There's a big difference between being wrong, and actually LYING THROUGH YOUR TEEETH.
Flight 77 FDR data, NTSB release, 31 Jan 2002:
tinyurl (dot) com/fhm32
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 4
@BlazingFerret the very fact that they claimed that the 2 towers were destroyed by jet fuel remains the basis of my argument, why didn't the pentagon burn down? Why can that book within the earlier scenes exist where it is and not be charred to a crisp.
This whole story is just a story nothing more. The evidence at hand does not persist with the entire scene which we are watching. If jet fuel broke down the 2 towers why not the pentagon?
I'm not going to talk about building 7..
Anxiety724 1 month ago
@Anxiety724 "they claimed that the 2 towers were destroyed by jet fuel"
That is NOT EVEN CLOSE to what they claimed. You're just repeating some bullshit strawman argument from a conspiracy website.
You might try actually reading the NIST report, or any of the dozens of journal articles written by real engineers.
They all state clearly that it was impact damage and uncontrollable fires (from burning office contents) that caused the collapse.
Jet fuel was merely an accellerant.
BlazingFerret 1 month ago
@Anxiety724 "If jet fuel broke down the 2 towers why not the pentagon?"
Nobody ever said that jet fuel caused the WTC collapse. Jet fuel was only the accelerant; the building contents burned after that. And every engineering & scientific article stated clearly that plane damage AND uncontrolled fires caused the collapse.
SpookMSgt 1 month ago
@BlazingFerret Then, why was all video evidence of the actual "Crash" confiscated? Even private security camera video.. the feds came in an just took it. Why was the hole at first only 16 feet wide, then later collapsed and made it into the 65-foot hole? How is that possible with a 757?? Jet fuel burns HOT--there shouldn't have been an untouched computer monitor 2 feet from the crash. It would have been melted.. It's all a lie, who's to say what happened, but we know what did not.
bushpilot223 1 month ago
@bushpilot223 "Why was the hole at first only 16 feet wide"
It was never 16' wide. The wings tore out a hundred feet of reinforced concrete columns on the first floor, which can be seen here with measurements:
TinyUrl dot com/3yu2hz
And that computer monitor wasn't :2 feet from the crash, but two feet from the entire wedge that collapsed -- a long way from the fire.
Cops & FBI always confiscate video, at bank robberies, muggings, etc. Not exactly a new thing.
SpookMSgt 1 month ago
@BlazingFerret No, they aren't. Just because there a pictures of "wreckage", you can't just ignore all the other contradictory aspects of the incident.
MrStig691 1 month ago
"No photographs showing any recognizable wreckage from a 757" ... Lying motherfucker.
MrMZaccone 8 months ago
why does this moron not discuss this with a structure engineer, or blast expert? I do not believe reporters. They lie more than anyone else.
TheBingggg 8 months ago
@TheBingggg "why does this moron not discuss this with a structure engineer, or blast expert? "
Because those guys are too busy laughing their ass off at the idiots who actually believe this conspiracy crap.
That's the reason the Truthie Retards can't find one structural engineer to publish anything refuting the NIST report, nor one demolition expert that believes the twin towers were a demo job.
Every year they trot out some alleged demo expert, who ALWAYS proves to be a complete phony.
BlazingFerret 3 months ago 2
Those Muthers must think the American People are retarded to believe that phony set-up To many unasnwered questions that beg to be answered !! .
nicktesla45 9 months ago
yeah we are becoming aware that 9/11 didnt go down as the USA gov told us,
crazyknight2008 1 year ago
what about the firefighters that were in the lobby of WTC that said there were bombs going off? .... maybe they had some gas water heaters huh ...
2020starman 1 year ago
remote control jets the size of a 757's were introduced in 1988 ..
2020starman 1 year ago
Comment removed
2020starman 1 year ago
Am I missing something here. Surely reporters would have obtained a list of passengers. Did nobody talk to their relatives, attend their funerals. So the crew and all the passengers ID and background life history was artifitialy created and
nobody checked this out? I know the US media is famously subservient but even they would pick up on this.
cyclist68 1 year ago
the fact that people can look at a mock up picture of the size of the plane next to the pentagon and then conclude a plane crashed there is fucking worrying, I watched the BBC that day and they were calling it a small commuter jet (like 12 people plane) then they changed it later on and I assumed it was a mistake and they would change it back to a small plane, when they didn't that was it for me. The big conspiracy people can't handle concerns the media role in it all
keflar5 1 year ago 2
ok, there was a bomb inside, because there was no security at all of stolen money for cameras and alarms-so.....
rekaras 1 year ago
I dont believe that 911's field crash, or the WTC were a set up by the government at all... but I have always thought that the pentagon investigation was wrong.........because its so covered up, people cant 'actually' say what happened... be it a conspiracy theory or not, the government may have just told a lie... look at how things are just fine next to the damage... we dont have tech. that can do such things and NOT burn them...
ninjaone1 2 years ago
@ninjaone1 what about builfing 7 ? it was 6 or more blocks away
2020starman 1 year ago
@2020starman building 7 and what the guy said "pull it " they knew it was coming down hours before it did
butchd2010 1 year ago
@2020starman
saw an animation showing how that was possible just the other day...
TheDuvalMilitia 5 months ago
911 is and was a farse and the people will not be fooled 4-ever
jclemens1970 2 years ago
I guess the reason why there are so many videos like this out there is to break thru this mind block people create in their heads in order to protect themselves from a mental breakdown. Like jumping out of an airplane for the first time, the average persons mind blocks out the memory protecting him from overload.
There wasn't a reporter anywhere that day saying there was a sign of a wrecked plane except for the towers. So why do they create this lie in their heads?
Weak minds need protection.
personIamnot 2 years ago
so what do we do now?
USPatriotKid 2 years ago
Complacency, you can create your own quite feeling of false security.
This is recommended and used by the majority. Its a warm and cozy world created by the subconscious of the weak mind to protect itself from the extreme fear of reality. These people would not know how to handle the truth.
personIamnot 2 years ago
There is nothing that can be done. Even if an investigation should happen, do you think the people in charge at the time wound not use the cant answer that question due to "National Secuity"!! Plus, even if an investigation did happen, it would take years to complete. This has to do with the pipeline in Afghanistan to get it out of Taliban control. Terminate a few that were'nt needed anymore, take away all our rights and freedoms were all accomplished in one day plus many other things.
DreWhite100 2 years ago