The only people who get upset by the term golliwog, are the white middle class far left, like Galloway. I live next door to a black guy who was born and bred in Luton. He is as British as me, has a fantastic sense of humour, and he couldnt give a F*** about the term golliwog. He just laughs at the middle class lefties.
Steven the caller is SPOT ON! Banning certain words makes this country a worse place!
@ninjascroll6789 Jews are somewhat prominent in certain professions, the same as many ethnic groups are. (take the Japanese, for example) A disproportionately high number of socialist intellectuals throughout the last century and a half have been Jewish as well. Does that make socialism a Jewish conspiracy as well to you? It's a shame that you see the world through the paranoid, fascistic lens of 'the men conspiring behind the curtain', although if you do then your problem with Jews makes sense.
@undercoverbrother67 Your assumptions are baseless. I don't think that Galloway (or anyone else) is antisemitic purely because they don't like Israeli policies/Zionism. However (and this is the point that always seems to be lost) these things are antisemitic IF they use classic antisemitic motifs, such as the three examples I cited; true, Galloway never accused us of being warmongers or delighting in blood, but he did accuse Zionists of controlling the media. That's antisemitism, Israel or no.
@GAREMPOTS The only 'thicko' here is you, pal. Anybody reading your incoherent stream of not so fluid emptiness will recognise that. Crimes committed against black people for example, that you so readily dismiss, were happening as recently as the 1970s, and in many places are STILL happening. There are well publicised groups today in 'civilized' America, Britain and Russia dedicated solely to the hating and harming of black people. Not 400 years ago like crimes against the Scots... today!
@GAREMPOTS Hang on, I made a very simple point that black people and Jews suffered mass genocide, I didn't point fingers or say that genocide was a strictly 'white' crime, did I? Because Stalin killed his own people, Jews deserved to die? Because Idi Amin killed people, blacks deserve to die? And as far as African culture being tribal and full of blood shed, what do you think Scottish culture was?! A clan is a tribe! You are quick to defend 'white' when nobody was attacking 'white', says a lot.
@GAREMPOTS Have 'gingernuts' ever had genocide committed against them just for being 'gingernuts'? Have 'gingernuts' spent hundreds of years being butchered, strung from trees, ridiculed, discriminated against, enslaved, women raped, babies killed... just for being 'gingernuts'? No... however black people DID suffer that. Jewish people DID suffer that. Who the fuck are you to tell someone in which manner they should bleed?! Clown.
Funny... Mr. Galloway doesn't perceive any of his views as antisemitic, yet last time I checked, most Jews (including me) do. By the way, non-Jews--you should know, most Jews today have little experience being called 'Yid'. I personally do not care if somebody calls me a Yid; what I DO care about, however, is when people accuse Jews of controlling the media, being warmongers, or delighting in blood. THESE are things that Jews consider antisemitic; please consider that next time.
@shmuelposin When has Galloway ever accused Jews of 'being warmongers who delight in blood'? In fact, he has successfully sued several people and organisations for wrongly accusing him of anti-Semitism. Accusing Israel (the state) of criminality is not the same as accusing Jews. I put it to you that you see no difference, when clearly there is, simply because they are 'Jewish like you'. YOU are the racist. Yet he still says he would 'take the law into his hands' to defend you! consider that
@shmuelposin Jews do control the media. why do they have so many Jobs in the media compared to their miniscule percentage of the population? and what about the famous Jews who say themselves that Jews control the media? are they antisemitic as well?
Self-hating BLACKS only thought the GOLLYWOG offensive. I DON'T. It's a DOLL. and a good looking one AT THAT. I detest patronising whites who think they can speak on behalf of BLACKS just as much as the NATIONAL FRONT. Blacks happy in their own skin will NOT find a cloth doll with fuzzy hair and big wide eyes "offensive". Credit BLACKS with some intelligence assume the easily offended niggahs have NONE.
The muslims are fucking psychos who if they cant het their own was throw bomb threats. Ive lost relatives though war but I dont get offended by WW1 or WW2! But the muslims get offended bythe middle ages and earlier!
I'm half-black and I do not find Golly Wogs offensive. However, why does it matter if Golly Wogs are not on jam jars anymore, it doesn't really matter. Everybody needs to stop bitching and I mean everybody on both sides of the argument.
Totally agree with George it is about good manners it is good that he put this racist in their place hope he comes to Sweden people like him are needed here.
hes a yid....theres a gollywog...and im a jock!...big deal...and as for sooty,i like sooty is cute!...galloway is full of shit!...hes the racist!....galloway is a mongol!
one of my lochal shops have started selling Gollies like these ones i bougtht the big one i think hes so cute and oh so soft and cuddly and i had my aunts Golly when i was little as they were banned when i was young i took him into bed at nite still have that golly i think their adorable
Did you even listen to the video? As George says "you may not think that calling someone a cripple is offensive but somebody with disibilitys does and thats the point."
@edgertonuk Being a cripple is a disability, You cant claim disability allowance for being black .But who decides whos feeling s have been hurt? especially when tere is money to be made.
George Galloway is a clever man, but he is an extremist at times who plausibly advocates violence and violent organisations while making accusations based on emotive rather than complete facts, this raises questions over his true beliefs and his true attitude toward democracy and free speech.
i dont think the dude meant to come off like a prat..i think he was just sayn tht it doesnt offend him an i doubt it does..not that its right or i condone it..some are hurt by it..im irish(a mickey,spudpicker,paddy)theres loads..like i laugh about them names but some other irish might get offended so..blahhh we are all entitled to our own opinion is all im sayn
@boycosmic Hey I'll have you know there are many twats out there that would be deeply offended by the desparaging remarks you've made about twats. You should show a little more respect for others and their beliefs. XD
@boycosmic I find your comment offensive, you should be banned from YouTube because I am a thin skinned little pussy. XD That's the type of reasoning your hero has, and you support it. Fuckin Moron.
I find the Koran to be offensive to me, we should not allow it here in America because I find it deeply offensive. I also find ppl with English accents offensive. Hmm, let's see what else, I find your fucking face to be offensive you should not be allowed to walk around with your face on because it's offending me. Let's take it off, yes? For fuck's Sake Muslims find the skin of a woman offensive, are we someday going to have to cover all women up(Not just muslim women). Galloway is a hack.
The Crusades were about Freeing Jerusalem from the Islamic hordes, who raped, pillaged, and conquered Jerusalem. It was NOT about imperialists embarking on a land stealing rampage. So Galloway is WRONG in that respect.
@nomoreliblabcon - They would have freeing Jerusalem from Islamic occupation to replace it with a different form of occupation (a Western European one). They were not undertook out of any care for the people who had been raped and pillaged. Only a result of the Pope's command to have such lands in Christian possession.
@Pommit The people of Jerusalem WERE christian before Saladin and the muslims took over you idiot. The people were being converted to Islam against their will. Learn some history.
@nomoreliblabcon - I already mentioned that the area was under the control of Islamic rulers. The Christians were subject to a different regime occupying regime but it just happened to be Christian. Also, Jerusalem and Palestine was also populated by a significant number of Jewish people who were treated terribly by the Crusading Christians as opposed to the Muslims. Moreover, the Crusades were not just about Jerusalem. They took place in Spain and eastern europe and were ugly affairs.
@Pommit The Christians were THERE first, before Islam even came into existence, and the Jews treated the Christians terribly. They even crucified one of their own.
As far as spain and "parts of Eastern Europe were concerned, they were also Christian, and the muslims got their arses kicked for invading. It does not matter if they were "ugly affairs" or not. Just what are you getting at, because you have only succeeded in confusing me?
@nomoreliblabcon - I am disagreeing with your portrayal of the Crusades as some humanitarian mission to end Muslim oppression, as if these rapes and pillages (that you afford significance) were some motivatory factor behind the Europeans coming to the Holy Land. Yes, the Christians were persecuted at the inception of their wacky religion (they're all wacky) but Jewish persecution was long-term. My reference to Eastern Europe was in particular about the Fourth Crusade.
@Pommit The crusades into Jerusalem were ALL ABOUT freeing the Christians from the Muslim invaders. Make your mind up about the subject matter here. You keep jumping from subject to subject!
Who metioned the "fourth crusade"?
The inception of Christianity was 600 years before Islam, this is the subject that I brought up. Christians were in the holy land long before muslims.
YOU, are nothing but a sensationalist. Go read some books and troll someplace else.
@nomoreliblabcon - No, only a few historians believe that the first crusades were primarily motivated by any desire to free Christians. They were far more concerned with bringing certain territiories under Christian control as part of a religious mission. Not a humanitarian one. I mentioned the Fourth Crusade in reference to matters outside of the Holy Land and because...it was a crusade.
@Pommit So what makes your account authentic? From where did you source your information that is different to the commonly known account of the crusade into Jerusalem??You mention that this was just a land grab mission on the part of Christianity. Isn't that what motivated the Muslims to steal these lands from Christians in the first place? Because vast areas of the middle east were Christian and Judaic lands, long before Islam existed. You cannot dispute that fact.
@nomoreliblabcon - Authentic? I could ask the same of you. How do you think that the Crusades were some humanitarian mission or some mission established to set to rights the wrongs of having a Jewish and Christian land ruled by an Islam regime. Read up on it yourself. Much of the motivation was to heal the Great Schism with the Byzantine Empire and make Rome the centre of Christian power; it was also used to draw social violence away from Western Europe; and was also seen as righteous...
@nomoreliblabcon ...mission in God's eyes to bring Jerusalem under Christian control. I have not argued that it was a land grab simply for territorial gain, but for spiritual reward from God for removing the Muslims. Certainly on the Islamic regime it was a land grab. But there is little evidence to indicate that rape and pillaging were motivators.
George Galloway was awesome in this. But his callers seem to miss the 'good old days' when insulting ethnic minories was normal and they could do little about it.
As a mixed race person who regards himself as black call me a golliwog to my face and i`ll arrange a hospital stay for you.
the word cripple is mentioning somones missfortune unless galloway thinks being black is a misfortune i think he doesn't get it.
if someone called me a Mick or whatever it is they call irish people i would simply pity them that they think mentioning my race is some how insulting and really there are simply insulting themselves and their parents ability to raise them as galloway even tried to say when it came to the royal family.
that fat bastard couldnt smack shit. who are you anyway? did my comment offend YOU so much that you talked to me. I dont even know you and you dont know me, my problem is with him, not you.. but you must feel the need to get involved... dumbass, keep out of other peoples business you old prick
i dont care if you think im a prick.. good for you, i can take it, unlike some other little pussy holes on this video who cant take abit of critisism, like you really. go and wank over this old wrinkled fat fuck
I'm Black & this caller is a LIAR & a RACIST. No Black person in the UK or the world like being called a Golliwog, the N-word or any racist slurs. Racist callers like this cretin need to get over his sense of white superiority over Black folks & get a life. We see through your 'I'm NOT a racist but..'' act. Fuck all racist cunts & their apologists. Cretins!
I being a BRITISH ASIAN so shocked on the words of CAROL the cunt thatcher that it now confirms my thinking of how and howmuch the "POSHIES" hate darkies,
I,ll have a fantastic party the day this self important traitorous bast**** dies, hopefully with cancer. This man will not allow anyone else to put their opinion across why on earth do they allow him air time on a chat show.
witz the point in gettin offended? noboday wud care if they wer white. mabye calling them golliwogs is offensif but only if they take it that way. call me honky and whiteboy all day i dot care i wouldnt be offendid if u called a cripple either people shud keep an open mind and not be patroizing coz that just duz ma hed in.
"If somebody called you a yid in my presence I'd break their jaw!"
We seen this gobshites style at Glasgow airport where he went through a 'terrifying experience' at the hands of the Rangers loyal:
"I had a feeling of dread. I hurried off the plane and got to the luggage carousel as quickly as possible and prayed my bag would come first"
SHITHOUSE!!!
Basterfields 2 weeks ago
The only people who get upset by the term golliwog, are the white middle class far left, like Galloway. I live next door to a black guy who was born and bred in Luton. He is as British as me, has a fantastic sense of humour, and he couldnt give a F*** about the term golliwog. He just laughs at the middle class lefties.
Steven the caller is SPOT ON! Banning certain words makes this country a worse place!
anglosaxons100 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Galloway is anti-English, anti-Scottish, anti-Protestant, anti-Jewish, anti-American, anti-Northern Ireland, anti-Israel.
He is a demented bigot.
karezza6 1 month ago
Comment removed
karezza6 1 month ago
galloway actually confirmed in this video that he's a muslim, from 1:35
beardedcollie39 1 month ago 3
@ninjascroll6789 Jews are somewhat prominent in certain professions, the same as many ethnic groups are. (take the Japanese, for example) A disproportionately high number of socialist intellectuals throughout the last century and a half have been Jewish as well. Does that make socialism a Jewish conspiracy as well to you? It's a shame that you see the world through the paranoid, fascistic lens of 'the men conspiring behind the curtain', although if you do then your problem with Jews makes sense.
shmuelposin 1 month ago
@undercoverbrother67 Your assumptions are baseless. I don't think that Galloway (or anyone else) is antisemitic purely because they don't like Israeli policies/Zionism. However (and this is the point that always seems to be lost) these things are antisemitic IF they use classic antisemitic motifs, such as the three examples I cited; true, Galloway never accused us of being warmongers or delighting in blood, but he did accuse Zionists of controlling the media. That's antisemitism, Israel or no.
shmuelposin 3 months ago
George Galloway should have said if a Arabic team was called Dubai Jihadis then that would be very offensive to the West.
raskinman 4 months ago
@GAREMPOTS The only 'thicko' here is you, pal. Anybody reading your incoherent stream of not so fluid emptiness will recognise that. Crimes committed against black people for example, that you so readily dismiss, were happening as recently as the 1970s, and in many places are STILL happening. There are well publicised groups today in 'civilized' America, Britain and Russia dedicated solely to the hating and harming of black people. Not 400 years ago like crimes against the Scots... today!
undercoverbrother67 4 months ago
@GAREMPOTS Hang on, I made a very simple point that black people and Jews suffered mass genocide, I didn't point fingers or say that genocide was a strictly 'white' crime, did I? Because Stalin killed his own people, Jews deserved to die? Because Idi Amin killed people, blacks deserve to die? And as far as African culture being tribal and full of blood shed, what do you think Scottish culture was?! A clan is a tribe! You are quick to defend 'white' when nobody was attacking 'white', says a lot.
undercoverbrother67 4 months ago
@GAREMPOTS Have 'gingernuts' ever had genocide committed against them just for being 'gingernuts'? Have 'gingernuts' spent hundreds of years being butchered, strung from trees, ridiculed, discriminated against, enslaved, women raped, babies killed... just for being 'gingernuts'? No... however black people DID suffer that. Jewish people DID suffer that. Who the fuck are you to tell someone in which manner they should bleed?! Clown.
undercoverbrother67 4 months ago
Funny... Mr. Galloway doesn't perceive any of his views as antisemitic, yet last time I checked, most Jews (including me) do. By the way, non-Jews--you should know, most Jews today have little experience being called 'Yid'. I personally do not care if somebody calls me a Yid; what I DO care about, however, is when people accuse Jews of controlling the media, being warmongers, or delighting in blood. THESE are things that Jews consider antisemitic; please consider that next time.
shmuelposin 5 months ago
@shmuelposin When has Galloway ever accused Jews of 'being warmongers who delight in blood'? In fact, he has successfully sued several people and organisations for wrongly accusing him of anti-Semitism. Accusing Israel (the state) of criminality is not the same as accusing Jews. I put it to you that you see no difference, when clearly there is, simply because they are 'Jewish like you'. YOU are the racist. Yet he still says he would 'take the law into his hands' to defend you! consider that
undercoverbrother67 4 months ago
@shmuelposin Jews do control the media. why do they have so many Jobs in the media compared to their miniscule percentage of the population? and what about the famous Jews who say themselves that Jews control the media? are they antisemitic as well?
ninjascroll6789 2 months ago
Comment removed
shmuelposin 5 months ago
She found cripple offensive because more whites are cripple than wogs. LOL
SWEAEPE 5 months ago
RUBBISH!
Self-hating BLACKS only thought the GOLLYWOG offensive. I DON'T. It's a DOLL. and a good looking one AT THAT. I detest patronising whites who think they can speak on behalf of BLACKS just as much as the NATIONAL FRONT. Blacks happy in their own skin will NOT find a cloth doll with fuzzy hair and big wide eyes "offensive". Credit BLACKS with some intelligence assume the easily offended niggahs have NONE.
SWEAEPE 5 months ago
The muslims are fucking psychos who if they cant het their own was throw bomb threats. Ive lost relatives though war but I dont get offended by WW1 or WW2! But the muslims get offended bythe middle ages and earlier!
samj5664 7 months ago
@samj5664 Would you be offended if a Serbian sports team called itself the Red Scorpions?
Redcarpet01 7 months ago
Golly wog is not racist! In a
samj5664 7 months ago
I'm half-black and I do not find Golly Wogs offensive. However, why does it matter if Golly Wogs are not on jam jars anymore, it doesn't really matter. Everybody needs to stop bitching and I mean everybody on both sides of the argument.
WELLdoneEEYOOP 7 months ago
Galloway is a troll. I literally find it impossible to believe Galloway genuinely finds the Celtic Crusaders offensive.
MrSmidgie 8 months ago
Totally agree with George it is about good manners it is good that he put this racist in their place hope he comes to Sweden people like him are needed here.
Saura74 9 months ago
crusaders are pritty shit at rugby
bazerthehat 10 months ago
hes a yid....theres a gollywog...and im a jock!...big deal...and as for sooty,i like sooty is cute!...galloway is full of shit!...hes the racist!....galloway is a mongol!
jeaniehopkirk2 10 months ago
"Very cool black man"??!! Isn't that racist, to presume that all black people are cool? That's like presuming all black people are fast runners.
bugstrut 11 months ago
one of my lochal shops have started selling Gollies like these ones i bougtht the big one i think hes so cute and oh so soft and cuddly and i had my aunts Golly when i was little as they were banned when i was young i took him into bed at nite still have that golly i think their adorable
freacls 11 months ago
I will never be scotch ,but i would nt be offended if somebody called me scotch even if i was scotch.
jrobertsoneff 11 months ago
@jrobertsoneff
Did you even listen to the video? As George says "you may not think that calling someone a cripple is offensive but somebody with disibilitys does and thats the point."
edgertonuk 8 months ago
@edgertonuk Being a cripple is a disability, You cant claim disability allowance for being black .But who decides whos feeling s have been hurt? especially when tere is money to be made.
jrobertsoneff 8 months ago
George Galloway is a clever man, but he is an extremist at times who plausibly advocates violence and violent organisations while making accusations based on emotive rather than complete facts, this raises questions over his true beliefs and his true attitude toward democracy and free speech.
u6j6506 1 year ago
Taldari your pics are good
Reqrezentin 1 year ago
i dont think the dude meant to come off like a prat..i think he was just sayn tht it doesnt offend him an i doubt it does..not that its right or i condone it..some are hurt by it..im irish(a mickey,spudpicker,paddy)theres loads..like i laugh about them names but some other irish might get offended so..blahhh we are all entitled to our own opinion is all im sayn
TheIRiShCaSaNoVa 1 year ago
so if i banned video games i would create racism ? lol wtf is this guy rabbling about if we ban things we create racism
louiscfc93 1 year ago
@boycosmic Hey I'll have you know there are many twats out there that would be deeply offended by the desparaging remarks you've made about twats. You should show a little more respect for others and their beliefs. XD
Rhinotaur82 1 year ago
@boycosmic I find your comment offensive, you should be banned from YouTube because I am a thin skinned little pussy. XD That's the type of reasoning your hero has, and you support it. Fuckin Moron.
Rhinotaur82 1 year ago
I find the Koran to be offensive to me, we should not allow it here in America because I find it deeply offensive. I also find ppl with English accents offensive. Hmm, let's see what else, I find your fucking face to be offensive you should not be allowed to walk around with your face on because it's offending me. Let's take it off, yes? For fuck's Sake Muslims find the skin of a woman offensive, are we someday going to have to cover all women up(Not just muslim women). Galloway is a hack.
Rhinotaur82 1 year ago
The Crusades were about Freeing Jerusalem from the Islamic hordes, who raped, pillaged, and conquered Jerusalem. It was NOT about imperialists embarking on a land stealing rampage. So Galloway is WRONG in that respect.
nomoreliblabcon 1 year ago
Comment removed
Rhinotaur82 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon - Freeing them by doing what? And replacing the 'hordes' with What?
Pommit 1 year ago
@Pommit Well if you don't know, I suggest you go and learn. You don't pay me to be your history teacher.
nomoreliblabcon 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon - They would have freeing Jerusalem from Islamic occupation to replace it with a different form of occupation (a Western European one). They were not undertook out of any care for the people who had been raped and pillaged. Only a result of the Pope's command to have such lands in Christian possession.
Pommit 1 year ago
@Pommit The people of Jerusalem WERE christian before Saladin and the muslims took over you idiot. The people were being converted to Islam against their will. Learn some history.
nomoreliblabcon 1 year ago
Comment removed
Pommit 1 year ago
Comment removed
Pommit 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon - I already mentioned that the area was under the control of Islamic rulers. The Christians were subject to a different regime occupying regime but it just happened to be Christian. Also, Jerusalem and Palestine was also populated by a significant number of Jewish people who were treated terribly by the Crusading Christians as opposed to the Muslims. Moreover, the Crusades were not just about Jerusalem. They took place in Spain and eastern europe and were ugly affairs.
Pommit 1 year ago
@Pommit The Christians were THERE first, before Islam even came into existence, and the Jews treated the Christians terribly. They even crucified one of their own.
As far as spain and "parts of Eastern Europe were concerned, they were also Christian, and the muslims got their arses kicked for invading. It does not matter if they were "ugly affairs" or not. Just what are you getting at, because you have only succeeded in confusing me?
nomoreliblabcon 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon - I am disagreeing with your portrayal of the Crusades as some humanitarian mission to end Muslim oppression, as if these rapes and pillages (that you afford significance) were some motivatory factor behind the Europeans coming to the Holy Land. Yes, the Christians were persecuted at the inception of their wacky religion (they're all wacky) but Jewish persecution was long-term. My reference to Eastern Europe was in particular about the Fourth Crusade.
Pommit 1 year ago
@Pommit The crusades into Jerusalem were ALL ABOUT freeing the Christians from the Muslim invaders. Make your mind up about the subject matter here. You keep jumping from subject to subject!
Who metioned the "fourth crusade"?
The inception of Christianity was 600 years before Islam, this is the subject that I brought up. Christians were in the holy land long before muslims.
YOU, are nothing but a sensationalist. Go read some books and troll someplace else.
nomoreliblabcon 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon - No, only a few historians believe that the first crusades were primarily motivated by any desire to free Christians. They were far more concerned with bringing certain territiories under Christian control as part of a religious mission. Not a humanitarian one. I mentioned the Fourth Crusade in reference to matters outside of the Holy Land and because...it was a crusade.
Pommit 1 year ago
@Pommit So what makes your account authentic? From where did you source your information that is different to the commonly known account of the crusade into Jerusalem??You mention that this was just a land grab mission on the part of Christianity. Isn't that what motivated the Muslims to steal these lands from Christians in the first place? Because vast areas of the middle east were Christian and Judaic lands, long before Islam existed. You cannot dispute that fact.
nomoreliblabcon 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon - Authentic? I could ask the same of you. How do you think that the Crusades were some humanitarian mission or some mission established to set to rights the wrongs of having a Jewish and Christian land ruled by an Islam regime. Read up on it yourself. Much of the motivation was to heal the Great Schism with the Byzantine Empire and make Rome the centre of Christian power; it was also used to draw social violence away from Western Europe; and was also seen as righteous...
Pommit 1 year ago
@nomoreliblabcon ...mission in God's eyes to bring Jerusalem under Christian control. I have not argued that it was a land grab simply for territorial gain, but for spiritual reward from God for removing the Muslims. Certainly on the Islamic regime it was a land grab. But there is little evidence to indicate that rape and pillaging were motivators.
Pommit 1 year ago
One of my mates is of mixed-race and we used to say that he had the traits of both whites and blacks in that he was a shit dancer with a huge penis.
Jermyn78 1 year ago
George Galloway was awesome in this. But his callers seem to miss the 'good old days' when insulting ethnic minories was normal and they could do little about it.
As a mixed race person who regards himself as black call me a golliwog to my face and i`ll arrange a hospital stay for you.
SirHappyThe1st 1 year ago
the word cripple is mentioning somones missfortune unless galloway thinks being black is a misfortune i think he doesn't get it.
if someone called me a Mick or whatever it is they call irish people i would simply pity them that they think mentioning my race is some how insulting and really there are simply insulting themselves and their parents ability to raise them as galloway even tried to say when it came to the royal family.
topbluffa1 1 year ago
@topbluffa1 i think being compared with those dolls in this picture is a missfortune.
slimithy12 1 year ago
George Galloway is only interested in what George Galloway says
maparrish 1 year ago 9
George should ask some of these racists what their surname is.
I engaged with a similar moron in a pub a few weeks ago, he was complaining about assylum seekers. I asked him what his surname was.
He told me Dymytrowski.......
I nearly choked to death on my drink. I could'nt stop laughing for about 5 mins.
The worst thing was he could not understand what on earth I was laughing for.
God bless you George for trying to educate these morons. You deserve a Gold medal.
tonyface2007 2 years ago
whats SO PROUD about being a CRUSADER?
they got their asses kicked by MUSLIMS all the way till the last crusade !!!!!
man these english !!!!
zeb120 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHHAHA
hopehope321 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
George Galloway couldnt break someones jaw.. he is a fucking pussy
CJTheDream 2 years ago
I'm sure he could smack some sense in you, kid.
tooyjfwn 2 years ago
that fat bastard couldnt smack shit. who are you anyway? did my comment offend YOU so much that you talked to me. I dont even know you and you dont know me, my problem is with him, not you.. but you must feel the need to get involved... dumbass, keep out of other peoples business you old prick
CJTheDream 2 years ago
He was a boxer, so knock it off.
SomeOneFromOFS 2 years ago
why does everyone keep sticking up for him, he is a cunt
CJTheDream 2 years ago 2
He is 55
Reqrezentin 2 years ago
why does it matter if he is 55, i still think he is a prick
CJTheDream 2 years ago 2
@CJTheDream I think you are a prick.
Reqrezentin 2 years ago 2
i dont care if you think im a prick.. good for you, i can take it, unlike some other little pussy holes on this video who cant take abit of critisism, like you really. go and wank over this old wrinkled fat fuck
CJTheDream 2 years ago
I'm Black & this caller is a LIAR & a RACIST. No Black person in the UK or the world like being called a Golliwog, the N-word or any racist slurs. Racist callers like this cretin need to get over his sense of white superiority over Black folks & get a life. We see through your 'I'm NOT a racist but..'' act. Fuck all racist cunts & their apologists. Cretins!
H1MLA 2 years ago
I being a BRITISH ASIAN so shocked on the words of CAROL the cunt thatcher that it now confirms my thinking of how and howmuch the "POSHIES" hate darkies,
We will unite and fight the BNP(KKK indisguise).
zeb120 2 years ago
I,ll have a fantastic party the day this self important traitorous bast**** dies, hopefully with cancer. This man will not allow anyone else to put their opinion across why on earth do they allow him air time on a chat show.
coomby 2 years ago
According to Galloway's logic, if anyone finds the English flag offensive then it should be banned. Stupid.
Also, as far as he's concerned, no white British person can go on a crusade! Just as stupid.
No one is calling a black man a golliwog. The only connection is in the heads of people who want to connect it. They could be gorrillas is clothing.
Galloway is another part of the leftist PC social engineering agenda.
CrankCase08 2 years ago
bring back the gollywogs
stublue44 2 years ago
george so loves the sound of his own voice!
susanyana 2 years ago 2
witz the point in gettin offended? noboday wud care if they wer white. mabye calling them golliwogs is offensif but only if they take it that way. call me honky and whiteboy all day i dot care i wouldnt be offendid if u called a cripple either people shud keep an open mind and not be patroizing coz that just duz ma hed in.
Antihero0BTR 2 years ago
That guy is a dirty j00 who's calling in, no one cares his opinion.
nixaten 2 years ago
Oh yes George! 5 fucking stars!
carloswigan 2 years ago
"you have to walk in the other persons shoes"
but gollywogs cant afford shoes.
quibb666 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This presenters a prick!
spratty59 2 years ago
crusaders... haha dick.
Also being a hypocrite talking about clarkson having called someone a liar.
spratty59 2 years ago
I have to tune-in to this amazing entertainment..
Raybanmonster 3 years ago 2
nice clip
ExBoDyGuArD 3 years ago
Brilliant clip again mate.
Politicratos 3 years ago 2
Steven's just not getting it.
inbrooklyn2008 3 years ago 10
@inbrooklyn2008 You just love sucking up peoples asses.
1CyberPolice 1 year ago
Long Live George Galloway!
sera0001 3 years ago
yea..in hell!!
luvamymcfly 2 years ago
what/who gives you a guarantee that you will not rot in the hell too?
another Brainwashed sheep. *sigh*
sera0001 2 years ago
who said that i dont think i will rot in hell?
i was saying about george, not me, the video isnt about me , personal digs arent going to get you anywhere! pretentious idiot!
luvamymcfly 2 years ago