Haha, "digital" electric motor. Neodymium magnet motors are used in many applications where compact size is more important than cost. They've been around for 29 years.
The smaller the motor, the faster it spins. That doesn't mean much.
you mean that it rotates at about...let's see...if a formula one engine rotates at about 18 000 rpm, does this thing go at 90 000??? quite unlikely, but just what i think.
@tolisdrums yes it even says at dyson's website that it spins at 98 000 RPM. if you ever get the chance to, you should listen to one of these things, they are loud but they suck up a ton.
@lucasbudega YEs , because the ordinary rotor coil (wich wastes a lot of power) has a weaker field than a N-42 magnet , and you can redirect the power you'd need in the stator coil to pulse the rotor and spin it fast !
Dyson machines ARE good quality, but the price is nowhere near right. you can get vacuums that are all around better (although they may have less raw suction power) for less than what these run.
for comparison on how the F! engine isn't a big deal, the average RPM is 18000, while a cheapo 24X CD rom drive will get you 10000. it takes a top of the line machine to outdo a cheap CD rom drive. suction is to vacuum cleaners as megapixels are to digital cameras. if it's got mediocre rollers and air return systems, then the end result will still be pretty mediocre. Whats more, high suction vacuums can damage certain common types of upholstery and carpet materials.
neodynium magnets... like... every other electric motor that is worth using these days? nobody uses ceramic magnets in those anymore. and comparing the RPM capability of an electric motor to that of an internal combustion engine? that's apples and oranges right there. electric motors have by nature much less torque than an internal combustion engine, and much fewer moving and meshing parts, so naturally it will have higher RPM, (continued)
Dyson is like the Apple of vacuums, and I like it like that. An emphasis on high quality is always preferable to cheaply made junk from other sellers. I really like the effect they have on competition, to innovate that which needs a little innovation after decades of stagnation.
@hughtub "I really like the effect they have on competition" Dyson uses to many parts inside their vacuums which makes it prone to failure. I've used the Dyson ball. Wasn't impressed. If there is anything these companies REALLY sell you. It's just the brand name. Same with German luxury cars now adays.
@hughtub Apple? Haha why do you think Apple is such high quality? They're only good for making Ipods which crap out on people and their computers can have just as many problems as a PC. They're only good for movie editing, music and all that jazz. People always say "Oh PCs get so many viruses" well that's because idiots allow them to get viruses. It's not hard to prevent your PC from getting a virus, none of my computers have ever had one and they've lasted much longer than any Mac.
Yeah, but Apple uses hardware that came out three years ago in their "newest" models of laptops and computers, while other manufacturers strive to provide the newest and best specs possible for an even lower price than Apple's "new" shit.
@hughtub Dude...the studd inside all the computers are practically the same. The Mac just as a more durable "shell" and sleek design. The Dyson's internals are more high tech than cheaper vaccums. It's a totally different animal.
this looks like a jet engine from an r/c airplane. Wonder if that works if attach these on r/c planes...lol
venxxxxx 1 week ago
so it uses a brushless motor?
the rc world has had them for years
skittlepower95 1 week ago
I got myself a Dyson digital motor from the new handhelds and the Airblade! It is the beauty that lies within the machine
ParkRyan123 1 week ago
faster than a f1 engine but like .50 lb of tourq
allen2688 2 weeks ago
So i can plug this into my car and speed off?
kyle170g 3 months ago
NIce 3D demo
DragonToko 4 months ago
To be fair, DC fan motors do have a bit less load and torque output than an F1 engine
cornboy3 5 months ago
just about any electric motor spins faster then a car engine lmao
JesusBerd 6 months ago
@JesusBerd r u kidding?
Fred6191 1 month ago
formula 1 engine can reach 20,000 rpm...so this little engine can reach 100,000 rpm ？！
exclusivecarter 7 months ago
@exclusivecarter massive lol !! Probably the 2006 cossie V8 revs even higher than that !
Douglas6250 6 months ago
I would expect to have seen solid-state capacitors with it being Dyson , but that's just me .
fly4fun123 7 months ago
so i put this in my car and il win every race??
wrestlingfan65 7 months ago
i would buy the vacuum. take the motor out, and then put it in an rc car. that would go so fast
mikeypowel22 7 months ago
are geare any 1? :D
sdevine1000 7 months ago
Wait, if it has more power than a Formula 1 Engine, does it have more noise?
DillandShaj 8 months ago
@DillandShaj, try to find a vid of a dyson in operation, or get one i guess, they sound like a leaf blower in your house.
iliteritmonkey 7 months ago
The average turbo can spin at 100,000 rpm under boost.
619426 8 months ago
@619426 200,000
shadooky 8 months ago
Haha, "digital" electric motor. Neodymium magnet motors are used in many applications where compact size is more important than cost. They've been around for 29 years.
The smaller the motor, the faster it spins. That doesn't mean much.
fubecabr 8 months ago
you mean that it rotates at about...let's see...if a formula one engine rotates at about 18 000 rpm, does this thing go at 90 000??? quite unlikely, but just what i think.
tolisdrums 9 months ago
@tolisdrums yes it even says at dyson's website that it spins at 98 000 RPM. if you ever get the chance to, you should listen to one of these things, they are loud but they suck up a ton.
stupidrandom101 9 months ago
@tolisdrums
90,000 rpm is no problem for a small electric motor. If you did magnetic bearings, you could do 1 million rpm.
fubecabr 8 months ago
thanks i really needed to suck the carpet off my floor
yamum0433 1 year ago 2
Can't wait to take this one apart!!!
slengineer91 1 year ago 2
Well, I think that thing is a brushless motor!
I have Modelcars, and they run with that kind of motors, too! Like 60mp/h and a crazy power.
RCPhilNX 1 year ago
Five times faster than a Formula 1 engine but to really impress build it out of carbon fiber!
VictorWI 1 year ago
Ok, so all of that is to neodymium magnets ?
lucasbudega 1 year ago
@lucasbudega YEs , because the ordinary rotor coil (wich wastes a lot of power) has a weaker field than a N-42 magnet , and you can redirect the power you'd need in the stator coil to pulse the rotor and spin it fast !
TheKaos90 1 year ago
Dyson machines ARE good quality, but the price is nowhere near right. you can get vacuums that are all around better (although they may have less raw suction power) for less than what these run.
Exarian 1 year ago
for comparison on how the F! engine isn't a big deal, the average RPM is 18000, while a cheapo 24X CD rom drive will get you 10000. it takes a top of the line machine to outdo a cheap CD rom drive. suction is to vacuum cleaners as megapixels are to digital cameras. if it's got mediocre rollers and air return systems, then the end result will still be pretty mediocre. Whats more, high suction vacuums can damage certain common types of upholstery and carpet materials.
(concludiing)
Exarian 1 year ago
neodynium magnets... like... every other electric motor that is worth using these days? nobody uses ceramic magnets in those anymore. and comparing the RPM capability of an electric motor to that of an internal combustion engine? that's apples and oranges right there. electric motors have by nature much less torque than an internal combustion engine, and much fewer moving and meshing parts, so naturally it will have higher RPM, (continued)
Exarian 1 year ago
What 100,000 RPM plus?
Films4You 1 year ago
does your vaccuum cleaner have the PROPER AMOUNT OF SUCTION?
streetstylemagic 1 year ago
You are the awesomest Dyson!
narekarmenian 1 year ago 17
Apple, bose and dyson are my faveroite companies.
calvinator9111111111 1 year ago
Dyson is like the Apple of vacuums, and I like it like that. An emphasis on high quality is always preferable to cheaply made junk from other sellers. I really like the effect they have on competition, to innovate that which needs a little innovation after decades of stagnation.
hughtub 2 years ago 50
@hughtub "I really like the effect they have on competition" Dyson uses to many parts inside their vacuums which makes it prone to failure. I've used the Dyson ball. Wasn't impressed. If there is anything these companies REALLY sell you. It's just the brand name. Same with German luxury cars now adays.
EpiDemic117 1 year ago
@hughtub Apple? Haha why do you think Apple is such high quality? They're only good for making Ipods which crap out on people and their computers can have just as many problems as a PC. They're only good for movie editing, music and all that jazz. People always say "Oh PCs get so many viruses" well that's because idiots allow them to get viruses. It's not hard to prevent your PC from getting a virus, none of my computers have ever had one and they've lasted much longer than any Mac.
TheTrueUSPatriot 1 year ago
@hughtub Oh and don't even get me started on the iphone cause droid and the windows phone showed it up big time.
TheTrueUSPatriot 1 year ago
@hughtub Apple is good quality?
AgentCROCODILE 11 months ago
@hughtub
Yeah, but Apple uses hardware that came out three years ago in their "newest" models of laptops and computers, while other manufacturers strive to provide the newest and best specs possible for an even lower price than Apple's "new" shit.
tilxGH 11 months ago
@hughtub Of course if you wanted to customize your vacuum you'd be screwed.
AresExodus 8 months ago
@hughtub Yeah but PC's are still better.
ind20000 8 months ago
@hughtub
There's a massive hole in your logic. Apple isn't a quality manufacturer.
MachiiUnin 7 months ago
@MachiiUnin How so? They use high quality materials in everything I've seen, not cheapo plastic. I'm just curious, if you know something I don't.
hughtub 5 months ago
@hughtub So if Dyson are the Apple of vacuums, what are Kirby?
tlaroche38 6 months ago
@hughtub hehe is this is like an apple-dyson fanboy comment
TheMeisterize 3 months ago
@hughtub Dude...the studd inside all the computers are practically the same. The Mac just as a more durable "shell" and sleek design. The Dyson's internals are more high tech than cheaper vaccums. It's a totally different animal.
rasmasyean 2 months ago