@7:00 has any consideration in future analyses ever been given to Bxf4!? I'm assuming Karpov missed it because of the time constraints during the blitz game. This way, his knight would still be posted up high on e2 holding down the d4 and f4 squares and allow one of his rooks to line up on the e-file while both of Kasparov's knights are pinned....
Unless I'm missing a mating net or a gambit of some kind...
just glancing, if h rook blocks, black bishop has no play, and i don't see the white bishop as a threat once rook moves up to e7...don't see any advantages for white in pawn trades either
@PokemonPuzzleJudge afte e7?, which is another blunder, queen simply takes rook, white promotes on f1 best move, comes with check. Kf1 and white is hopelessly losing. Best is rook takes queen, queen takes rook check, white king moves and black bishop takes white, crushing white and winning easily.
La suma total de partidas a lo largo de los seis años de enfrentamientos por el título mundial alcanzó a 144 juegos; Kasparov triunfó en 21 ocasiones, Karpov en 19, y 104 fueron empates.
Como vemos a pesar de parecer que Kasparov siempre ha estado por encima de Karpov, el resultado final de partidas es extremadamente igualado habiendo ganado Kasparov únicamente 2 partidas mas que su adversario Karpov.
@jrobichess At 7:15, why didn't Kasparov take the pawn on b5 with his queen, equalizing material and attacking white's pawn on b3? I know it takes an attacker off of d5, but white would also have to lose a defender from d5 (namely, the queen or the rook) in order to defend b3. Plus, the knight move to d4 would still have been possible. Am I missing something here?
After spending hours going through chess videos on YouTube and correcting people that didn't know what they were talking about, it is so refreshing to come across a video like this one. The analysis was great, well documented, and an all around great job.
please never stop uploading videos like this. as a new chess enthusiast, i can't even describe how interesting and well done this was. thank you so much.
you might consider making some videos describing different scenarios and deeper level chess strategy.
It appears he doesnt want to loss the advantage, although you can argue about an open board and two bishops aganist two castels. The knight scarifice protected his pawns and he swaps a castel for bishop.
On an open board the foul rules often, not a bad play. He just didn't want to loss the pawn if you ask me- so forced the knight away. If he left it the knight would have attacked the queen also potencially weakening the central line.
No being down a pawn is being down a pawn, being down a point is being down a point. Pawns and points are not the same thing, interchangable you clearly see them, but then I have never played for points. Personally rather than going round and round disputing pawns and points why dont we just agree were both right in different ways, and talking in different terms, although surely having more pawns should mean he has not lost points so again should be up not down but I dont point play
I like your graphics with the arrows showing the moves. It easier to follow and elucidate, and the pace is perfect. You have the finest game review videos by far imho.
from that great position if i had to guess it would of played out as a draw if no blunders were made P.S. comp would probly say white has slight advantage only because white always leads giving it the initial advantage
from 6:34 i feel as though kasparov could not have done better to achieve the board position at 7:20 that seems like a huge shift in position of power to me.
@salvinluckys knight seems better because there is the outpost on e6, plus it brings the piece closer to the center of the board and also setting possible discovered atacks. If captures with knight, then black rook to e8 would pose some trouble to white.
Kasparklunk demolished Karpov in this match 9-3. I thought it would be a lot closer as Karpov is suppose to be a very good rapid player, and has still been active in tournament chess.
Thing was, in Valencia 2009 Karpov and Kasparov played four rapid games plus eight blitz games. Kasparov won 9-3 btw. ;) And you are right, Karpov was actually running out of time in this match, that's why this match ended 0-1 at Ne6.
I don't fully understand Karpov's 7:13, Nb5...after the trade Nxb5 I see only disadvantages. I think it was to stop ...Bxc3; Qxc3 and then Bxd5 maybe?
why at that special point .. you know.. when the knight removed two defenders.. so why did karpov resign?? if he kept going he could defend the pawn with the knight and the bishop.......
I just wanted to say, it wasn't because of this video in particular, but one of the instructional vids that I was able to beat my chess program on level 10(the highest level) for the first time. I cant tell you how happy I was, it was my own personal Stanley Cup or Super Bowl victory.
@SyracuseLax09 He wasn't as good as either of them at that time; in the Fischer-Spassky match from 1992, it was pretty clear that his skill had diminished a bit.
@tatomuck18 because white would lose his queen qith an uncastled queen which would force the king to move , also if white captured it opens up the centre for black
Hey, excellent commentary. I think often with Grand masters, we don't understand the reasons behind every move we make untill we get to that level of understanding or study it intensely. Also to jrobichess - Just wanrt to thank you for uploading these videos. You have done alot of promote chess to people and for the chess community. I really appreciate it :)
i guess the 'giving up' is obvious... for one the white pawns on B line are obviously verry weak... at the other end the defence of black pawns at h/g is quite solid.. the middle pawn.. the white pawn is not going to be able to be saved once black decides to put up pressure with his peaces INCLUDING his king .. which how ever you put it will conclude in once again structural loss.. AND carpov is already behind >:)
karpov's wife was in labor and he had to attend missing the game but when he returned judges had issues with him thinking about the match so the two never got to finish the game -- source: my grandfather from Bangladesh had known karpov to be within the hospital and even took a picture of him inside the hospital where his wife was having a miracle :)
at the end if he did double the rooks on the d file bishop c6 would be a big threat to queen the past pawn and black would either lose a rook or give the exchange back
its nan interesting game indeed but i would surely want to play with the best chess player in the world here in the phillipines many chess player want to play with the best player in the world
Just a clarification on the introduction about the match in 1984. You get a wrong impression here, it was actually Karpov who was in the lead by 5-3 before they stopped it.
@rimbaud65 Yeah, but you also have to realize that Karpov was leading 4-0 in the beginning of the match, and after they drew 17 games, he won game 27 making it 5-0. Then they made further draws until game 32, which was Kasparov's first ever win against Karpov. Then 15 more draws. You could tell Kasparov was getting better and better and Karpov was getting tired. They both wanted to continue playing but it was up to the Russian government. The reason it was stopped was purely political.
@Murreh Yup Jrobi, you got me addicted to chess. I play all day every day and watch your videos. I'm getting better but my girlfriend still kicks my ass.
@Murreh This just proves that it is very difficult to explain something you dont really understand. "From here now we swing, shift and jump bla bla bla......" Just awful
in this position the bishops are absolutely devastating, covering all of the diagonals. only thing is hes gonna have to deal with blacks pass pwns on the right side
@jrobichess i find the positon favouring black.. i think karpov blundered before i think he felt like losing thats why he did knight exchange... i cant believe the doubled pawns are good for white....and i still cant believe the computer favours white
@jrobichess Just horrible from here now swinging and jumping. Its like a russian librarian trying to cover american football. Plain funny, but also awful, weird, corny, naive and stupid.
07.56 Final point he does a few things with that move, he takes the knight away from it's central position, protects his pawns, doesnt risk a knight playing arround with his queen, losses a tower but keeps his pawn advantage and as you say it's very playable with two bishops. Why he resigns is interesting, 8.38 anybodies game still. I don't see a blunder there really.
@Zelrio28 im guessing because alot of times your computer screen probably looks like this! but really who care... good vid good comentary man, i always wonder what you chess comentators look like in person do like just imagine if you were a juiced out bodybuilder commentating on chess. Love the vids man
he's definitely one of the best but he's not the actual current world number 1, it's some young 19 year old kid that Kasparov is training up....think about what a lucky mother fella this kid is....i'd give my left nut to have Gary Kasparov as my chess tutor.
@BeauG1990 That is most likely Magnus Carlsen from my home country, Norway ^^ But i know nothing about chess though. Fun to watch these reviews. although i'd like to know who won this exact match!!
These two legends are nuts! They built up so much in the center, that it might just hold there for couple more turns...that's what i think until each other finds a weakness that they could use, but i think Black would have to go in first to get that White pawn out of the way
You are very, very good at analyzing. I think it would have been good for you to spend more time examining possible lines of attack about that knight on d4.
Hi j. As with all your commentaries you have done a superb job at explaining elements and stratagy of the game. You have def play the biggest part of my game development. I appriciate that! I think i heard you say on one video that you dont by any means consider yourself to be a grandmaster, but you are def a master and well on your way to becoming a grandmaster! thanx
the passed pawn dosent mean shit if theirs a rook on the proper side
BluntZilla57 1 day ago
So what happened.. did I miss something, did karpov resign?
tonyfalca 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hola como estan bueno las personas que esten interesada en aprender apertura le recomiendo este blog ronnytodoajedrez.blogspot.com
SuperJajajajajja 3 days ago
Comment removed
georgebi12345 6 days ago
@7:00 has any consideration in future analyses ever been given to Bxf4!? I'm assuming Karpov missed it because of the time constraints during the blitz game. This way, his knight would still be posted up high on e2 holding down the d4 and f4 squares and allow one of his rooks to line up on the e-file while both of Kasparov's knights are pinned....
Unless I'm missing a mating net or a gambit of some kind...
drumass666 1 week ago
Great game, great commentary.
ujustgotpwned2008 1 week ago
If karpov is white you have to put Karpov Vs Kasparov and not the other way around.
bng357 3 weeks ago 4
I like your style and chess analysis.
7678787 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from jrobichess
This has been flagged as spam show
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Theh4tzio5 1 month ago
so who winn?
Androsstudio 1 month ago
@Androsstudio kasparov
burt591 1 month ago
whats your chess rating? and whats the highest win % in history? Also whats mangus carlos win %
angeriod 1 month ago
@angeriod idk but kasparov''s whas 69% hehe 69
Alien43 1 month ago
@angeriod bobby fischer has the highest %
cvetko5 1 week ago
ok
sobribuqhari1 1 month ago
2:45, first move
oreo8118 1 month ago
just glancing, if h rook blocks, black bishop has no play, and i don't see the white bishop as a threat once rook moves up to e7...don't see any advantages for white in pawn trades either
dimethylethyltritolu 1 month ago
for me chess was ALWAYS interesting
Stephsteph1224 1 month ago
nice
kaoxing3gauleu 1 month ago
@PokemonPuzzleJudge afte e7?, which is another blunder, queen simply takes rook, white promotes on f1 best move, comes with check. Kf1 and white is hopelessly losing. Best is rook takes queen, queen takes rook check, white king moves and black bishop takes white, crushing white and winning easily.
hthought 1 month ago
Comment removed
hthought 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
La suma total de partidas a lo largo de los seis años de enfrentamientos por el título mundial alcanzó a 144 juegos; Kasparov triunfó en 21 ocasiones, Karpov en 19, y 104 fueron empates.
Como vemos a pesar de parecer que Kasparov siempre ha estado por encima de Karpov, el resultado final de partidas es extremadamente igualado habiendo ganado Kasparov únicamente 2 partidas mas que su adversario Karpov.
11119341 2 months ago
Given that Kasparov was playing black, the title of the video should be Karpov vs. Kasparov. Small detail but is confusing.
karljobst 2 months ago
@karljobst IN all chess game titles Kasparov deserves to be first IMO just cuz he is KASPAROV
TheSFSkinny 2 months ago
j'adore l'intro !!
chreuneubeul 2 months ago
blax23
sobribuqhari1 2 months ago
quien es kien?
kasparov juega cn las blancas?
alejandrox104 2 months ago
nose ingles...
CentralClaudio 2 months ago 7
@CentralClaudio Por lo visto tampoco español por que no se escribe "nose ingles..." se escribe : no se inlges. pfffffffff
noob6661 3 weeks ago
I wonder if you meant that Kasparov was leading the 1984 match 5-3? Of course it was Karpov who was leading 5-3.
iankyoko 2 months ago
escaque64yconcafe.blogspot.com/
lenyal 3 months ago
When Ne6 is played, why black dont play Nb3, capturing the pawn and threatening the white's queen?
CHStriker83 3 months ago
@CHStriker83 bcos the knight would then take the left rook also threatening the queen.
NsEricNs 2 months ago
ese pinche nariz de machete realmente es bueno!! xD
xerox88fay 3 months ago
how do you spell vee-un-keto?
toiletscrubbr 4 months ago
@toiletscrubbr fianchetto
BarfBag38 4 months ago
Justin Biiber is better! (sarcasm) :)
Rahetor2 5 months ago
@Rahetor2 ???????????????? idiot
hellvings 3 months ago
@jrobichess At 7:15, why didn't Kasparov take the pawn on b5 with his queen, equalizing material and attacking white's pawn on b3? I know it takes an attacker off of d5, but white would also have to lose a defender from d5 (namely, the queen or the rook) in order to defend b3. Plus, the knight move to d4 would still have been possible. Am I missing something here?
xHaloFan4Lifex 6 months ago
@xHaloFan4Lifex Then Ne6 would work, forking the rooks. Then ... Bxd5 Nxd8 1-0. I guess.
Paddamtsssj 6 months ago
@Paddamtsssj oh sorry you got there before me.
curiosofsigns 6 months ago
@xHaloFan4Lifex Ne6
curiosofsigns 6 months ago
wath color is Karpov?
owengordo 6 months ago
@owengordo White
HarryPotterDude1000 5 months ago
thanks man, this is cool
BugzLooney 6 months ago
best chess video.
cacasarq 7 months ago
After spending hours going through chess videos on YouTube and correcting people that didn't know what they were talking about, it is so refreshing to come across a video like this one. The analysis was great, well documented, and an all around great job.
Thank you very much! Fantastic job :)
NuklearStarcraft 7 months ago 19
please never stop uploading videos like this. as a new chess enthusiast, i can't even describe how interesting and well done this was. thank you so much.
you might consider making some videos describing different scenarios and deeper level chess strategy.
again, thank you so much
OSU3737 7 months ago
surely the position is over for white. The passed pawn is meat and the bishops cant do much else in their support
kinkokonko 8 months ago
Karpov was leading 5 - 3. Not Kasparov. What would of happened if it continued in 1984 is any ones guess? But the momentum was with Karsparov.
What I hate in World Chess is this retain title on draw shit.
The challenger comes through so much to get to the final and then the champion can just be cagey and retain.
Karpov drew 12-12 with Kasparov in 1987.
Bronstein with Botvinnick same score years before.
Anyway you don't really know who is better. 1 point clear should be the rule..
kinkokonko 8 months ago
the black beshop is taking the powm I mean the next move after karpov's Kinght move.
Esan961 9 months ago
after Karpov moved the knight,black takes the Pd5 and black lets the white to take the rok either one he wants. think of this way
Esan961 9 months ago
you make the best chess videos! rock on!
MrWikingr 9 months ago
I feel again the epicness of chess as i did discover it on dota..
mukmin01 9 months ago
@mukmin01 lol never thought i'd see a mention of dota in a chess video but ya i know what you mean
Mikalaranda 9 months ago
@mukmin01 hell yeah
TheBigBadBird 9 months ago
It appears he doesnt want to loss the advantage, although you can argue about an open board and two bishops aganist two castels. The knight scarifice protected his pawns and he swaps a castel for bishop.
On an open board the foul rules often, not a bad play. He just didn't want to loss the pawn if you ask me- so forced the knight away. If he left it the knight would have attacked the queen also potencially weakening the central line.
099749 9 months ago in playlist ERRRR......
@jrobichess cont...
08.45 White is up a pawn not down. My answer below, you'll be suprised what some players will do to say up a piece.
099749 9 months ago in playlist ERRRR......
@099749 White is down a pawn..
RsGhost1 8 months ago
@RsGhost1
White ends with 6 pawns black has five. White is up a pawn not down to be down a pawn he'd need to have four.
099749 8 months ago
@099749 Being down a pawn, means being down one point in material, Which happens to be the case.
RsGhost1 8 months ago
@RsGhost1
No being down a pawn is being down a pawn, being down a point is being down a point. Pawns and points are not the same thing, interchangable you clearly see them, but then I have never played for points. Personally rather than going round and round disputing pawns and points why dont we just agree were both right in different ways, and talking in different terms, although surely having more pawns should mean he has not lost points so again should be up not down but I dont point play
099749 8 months ago
@099749 It's chess slang m8.. don't make a big fuss
RsGhost1 8 months ago
@RsGhost1
I'm not.
099749 8 months ago
I like your graphics with the arrows showing the moves. It easier to follow and elucidate, and the pace is perfect. You have the finest game review videos by far imho.
cupwithhandles 9 months ago
from that great position if i had to guess it would of played out as a draw if no blunders were made P.S. comp would probly say white has slight advantage only because white always leads giving it the initial advantage
aqwdemonmaster 10 months ago
Appreciate your analys on this , good job but why is the black upside down and the screen is too wide makes the squares look rectangle.
1bond0071 10 months ago
At 6:33 it's g3 and not g4.
TheNitromeFan 10 months ago
69 win percentage over 23 games... ahahahahaha.....69...
Jimmy838123 10 months ago
@Jimmy838123 why are you laughing
klonout 10 months ago
Thanks for the Video
Beatlesforever97 11 months ago
What the Champions
AndreaHotspur 11 months ago
from 6:34 i feel as though kasparov could not have done better to achieve the board position at 7:20 that seems like a huge shift in position of power to me.
willy14916 11 months ago
jrobi why at 06:59 he doesnt capture with his darksquare bishop??
salvinluckys 1 year ago 2
@salvinluckys knight seems better because there is the outpost on e6, plus it brings the piece closer to the center of the board and also setting possible discovered atacks. If captures with knight, then black rook to e8 would pose some trouble to white.
hthought 5 months ago
All these videos make chess too accessible for everyone... hard to become the world chess champion when everyone is going after the same thing
damthatriver09 1 year ago
awesome video man! nice job
bousono1 1 year ago
Kasparklunk demolished Karpov in this match 9-3. I thought it would be a lot closer as Karpov is suppose to be a very good rapid player, and has still been active in tournament chess.
Nickalispicalis 1 year ago
You are so right. Nd4 was just an amazing moment and it would be really interesting to see the lines that would happen if they played it out fully.
armatageshanks66 1 year ago
Lenght of the board is 8 inches and width is 5 inches LOL Shouldnt be equal??
ilovemushi 1 year ago
Thing was, in Valencia 2009 Karpov and Kasparov played four rapid games plus eight blitz games. Kasparov won 9-3 btw. ;) And you are right, Karpov was actually running out of time in this match, that's why this match ended 0-1 at Ne6.
ValeHikari 1 year ago
because kasparov won... lol
enlightenment2u 1 year ago
what chess program do you use ?
StoneHawk1 1 year ago
you are a very nice teacher. I like your videos a lot. thank you for showing all the videos.
aryamanbansal 1 year ago
I don't fully understand Karpov's 7:13, Nb5...after the trade Nxb5 I see only disadvantages. I think it was to stop ...Bxc3; Qxc3 and then Bxd5 maybe?
Maybe white didn't have better alternatives?
DinkyDoeDoe 1 year ago
why at that special point .. you know.. when the knight removed two defenders.. so why did karpov resign?? if he kept going he could defend the pawn with the knight and the bishop.......
apotsa1994 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Klash of the K's more like it
DeltaA118 1 year ago
Clash of the K's more like it
DeltaA118 1 year ago
Comment removed
DeltaA118 1 year ago
How much time do the players have?
djmpvae 1 year ago
@TheMomsen123 I ask the same question, why?
lamykin2 1 year ago
Keep up the good work with these videos. Subbed.
theabominable 1 year ago
I just wanted to say, it wasn't because of this video in particular, but one of the instructional vids that I was able to beat my chess program on level 10(the highest level) for the first time. I cant tell you how happy I was, it was my own personal Stanley Cup or Super Bowl victory.
sneakybees 1 year ago
you've sparked an interest for chess i didn't even think i had
kekkphatt 1 year ago
i dont agree with the two best chess players facing off against each other. what about bobby
SyracuseLax09 1 year ago
@SyracuseLax09 He wasn't as good as either of them at that time; in the Fischer-Spassky match from 1992, it was pretty clear that his skill had diminished a bit.
NumbFlynn 1 year ago
This was a biltz match?!
LiiChinHo 1 year ago
at 3:48, why didnt white just capture blacks pawn at c6? Its a free piece.
tatomuck18 1 year ago
@tatomuck18 because white would lose his queen qith an uncastled queen which would force the king to move , also if white captured it opens up the centre for black
mrgoodfight14 1 year ago
@tatomuck18 because then the queen would be wide open for the taking
Destroyer3012 1 year ago
@tatomuck18 P.S on c5. Its tactics. Capturing breakes white,s center so thats good for black.
Lukas23233 1 year ago
Hey, excellent commentary. I think often with Grand masters, we don't understand the reasons behind every move we make untill we get to that level of understanding or study it intensely. Also to jrobichess - Just wanrt to thank you for uploading these videos. You have done alot of promote chess to people and for the chess community. I really appreciate it :)
8mikomi8 1 year ago
Jay Ro Bitches!!!
jigglyfidda125 1 year ago
i guess the 'giving up' is obvious... for one the white pawns on B line are obviously verry weak... at the other end the defence of black pawns at h/g is quite solid.. the middle pawn.. the white pawn is not going to be able to be saved once black decides to put up pressure with his peaces INCLUDING his king .. which how ever you put it will conclude in once again structural loss.. AND carpov is already behind >:)
NewKindOfSoldier 1 year ago
i like the pision because for me i would take the pawn on b3 then swing my knight back then captuare the other pawn. But well done to both men!!!
Jcb2k10 1 year ago
at 7.30 he also cuts out a defender to d 5 with the threat of the fork on king queen maybe wasnt mentioned due to the simplicity but worth mentioning
monkey1506 1 year ago
The 1984 match was halted with KARPOV not Kasparov leading 5 - 3.
SansEverything 1 year ago
Very good annotation. Nice job.
pl0x3rzj00 1 year ago
I really love chess, but my brain really hurts now from thinking >.< :P
leedsfanalways 1 year ago 4
2 great players with two totally different chess styles
artman201 1 year ago
karpov's wife was in labor and he had to attend missing the game but when he returned judges had issues with him thinking about the match so the two never got to finish the game -- source: my grandfather from Bangladesh had known karpov to be within the hospital and even took a picture of him inside the hospital where his wife was having a miracle :)
MsMusicLoverXD 1 year ago 12
@MsMusicLoverXD hahahahaa karpov was like 70 something years old in 2009. what you say cant possibly be true...
chrism216 6 months ago
@chrism216 He was 57, dude... he can belive me :D
yafazudametalero 5 months ago
Are you Canadian? cus when you said "stopped" you make it more "staapped" which is totally awesome! haha, i love canada
JagSmakarSkit 1 year ago
You're the best jrobichess. i love watching chess games.
niceguyazrem 1 year ago
Watch this dramatic 1 min. chess promo!!! search
2010 Ontario Chess Open Championships
robmurel 1 year ago
at the end if he did double the rooks on the d file bishop c6 would be a big threat to queen the past pawn and black would either lose a rook or give the exchange back
sutomaraj 1 year ago
its nan interesting game indeed but i would surely want to play with the best chess player in the world here in the phillipines many chess player want to play with the best player in the world
fanaddict18 1 year ago
ae you good at chess?
crazyozzyking 1 year ago
Just a clarification on the introduction about the match in 1984. You get a wrong impression here, it was actually Karpov who was in the lead by 5-3 before they stopped it.
rimbaud65 2 years ago
@rimbaud65 Yeah, but you also have to realize that Karpov was leading 4-0 in the beginning of the match, and after they drew 17 games, he won game 27 making it 5-0. Then they made further draws until game 32, which was Kasparov's first ever win against Karpov. Then 15 more draws. You could tell Kasparov was getting better and better and Karpov was getting tired. They both wanted to continue playing but it was up to the Russian government. The reason it was stopped was purely political.
AKnobGoblin 1 year ago
did Kasparov ever face Fisher??
Dariboro 2 years ago
nope. they never played one another. Fischer more or less flaked out and disappeared in the late 70s. Kasparov hit the scene in the early 80s.
jaywolfenstien 2 years ago
thanks men
I´m a begginer but I found very interesting the world of chess
It would have been the best match ever!!
Dariboro 2 years ago
Never realised Chess was this interesting, wow!
Murreh 2 years ago 80
@Murreh Yup Jrobi, you got me addicted to chess. I play all day every day and watch your videos. I'm getting better but my girlfriend still kicks my ass.
dp1569 1 year ago
Comment removed
elvarg991 1 year ago
@Murreh This just proves that it is very difficult to explain something you dont really understand. "From here now we swing, shift and jump bla bla bla......" Just awful
elvarg991 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@elvarg991 From here now, you are just a swinging patzer trying to explain something you dont understand :)
elvarg991 1 year ago
@Murreh of course it is =]
fiendin281 8 months ago
i dont think it was a blunder whatsoever
in this position the bishops are absolutely devastating, covering all of the diagonals. only thing is hes gonna have to deal with blacks pass pwns on the right side
chrism216 2 years ago
Why do you tell this from black's perspective and put Kasparov's name first?
Zelrio28 2 years ago 2
This is a video, not a PGN file. All videos from the series will begin with the title as is. Thanks for checking it out!
jrobichess 2 years ago 32
Btw, thanks for saying Kasparov's name right, usually in English-speaking countries they say KAsparov, not like it should be - KaspArov :)
MoonchildMindaugas2 2 years ago
@jrobichess and why the hell are you so sick of PGN file format ? What's wrong with it ?
In football, the first team name is always the team who owns the land, and the second team is guest at the first team.
And in chess, the first name stands for white and the second is black player.
Anyway, thanks for sharing!
ronitovi 1 year ago
@jrobichess Up for teaching some strategies? =P
oXFalconXo 1 year ago
@jrobichess i find the positon favouring black.. i think karpov blundered before i think he felt like losing thats why he did knight exchange... i cant believe the doubled pawns are good for white....and i still cant believe the computer favours white
dragonheadofthewest 1 year ago
@jrobichess Just horrible from here now swinging and jumping. Its like a russian librarian trying to cover american football. Plain funny, but also awful, weird, corny, naive and stupid.
elvarg991 1 year ago
@elvarg991 No need to be a total cunt about it - if you don't like his videos (or the way he talks), then quit watching them.
RMToebben 1 year ago
@jrobichess cont...
07.56 Final point he does a few things with that move, he takes the knight away from it's central position, protects his pawns, doesnt risk a knight playing arround with his queen, losses a tower but keeps his pawn advantage and as you say it's very playable with two bishops. Why he resigns is interesting, 8.38 anybodies game still. I don't see a blunder there really.
099749 9 months ago
@Zelrio28 im guessing because alot of times your computer screen probably looks like this! but really who care... good vid good comentary man, i always wonder what you chess comentators look like in person do like just imagine if you were a juiced out bodybuilder commentating on chess. Love the vids man
MrCurodd 7 months ago
Kasparov is the best all time all know that , but he plays werry boring il think, my favorit all time gose to the one end only mr Morphy.
runiusgatan 2 years ago
is kasparov still the best player in the history of the game?
anadimitrova 2 years ago 2
he's definitely one of the best but he's not the actual current world number 1, it's some young 19 year old kid that Kasparov is training up....think about what a lucky mother fella this kid is....i'd give my left nut to have Gary Kasparov as my chess tutor.
BeauG1990 2 years ago
That kid would be Magnus carlsen, and I would also give my left nut to be tutored by Kasparov xD
Immortalassassin1 2 years ago 2
@BeauG1990 That is most likely Magnus Carlsen from my home country, Norway ^^ But i know nothing about chess though. Fun to watch these reviews. although i'd like to know who won this exact match!!
123TauruZ321 2 years ago
bobby fischer is was the best.
Imran500 1 year ago
2009 was a great year for chess!!!
Muzicboxtecnotunez 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice video,but you should have talked faster so you can talk more information about the game.
GuitarGunter 2 years ago
great vid keep them coming
luch0o01 2 years ago 2
Keep making nice chess videos.
shiryu008 2 years ago 59
These two legends are nuts! They built up so much in the center, that it might just hold there for couple more turns...that's what i think until each other finds a weakness that they could use, but i think Black would have to go in first to get that White pawn out of the way
Aleneden 2 years ago
very interesting!
however, it's little bit too fast for me....= =
could you please explain more and speak more slowly?
thanx!!
yigibon 2 years ago
You are very, very good at analyzing. I think it would have been good for you to spend more time examining possible lines of attack about that knight on d4.
fluff125 2 years ago
Hi j. As with all your commentaries you have done a superb job at explaining elements and stratagy of the game. You have def play the biggest part of my game development. I appriciate that! I think i heard you say on one video that you dont by any means consider yourself to be a grandmaster, but you are def a master and well on your way to becoming a grandmaster! thanx
TheRoninwarrior 2 years ago 2
in case someone didn't already tell you, karpov ran out of time. good analysis jrobi!
llK1NGp1Nll 2 years ago 3
Very good analasys dude. I am impresed! Nice job..
SPYx33 2 years ago 3
great videos, prefer the older music you had for your intro section though
fyckthissht 2 years ago
nice video
it helped do my project
smegharao 2 years ago
Emocionante,ahora ya paso toda su rivalidad.Juegan,no combaten.Las ideas estan en los 64 escaques.
paradoxicus 2 years ago
What was the amount of time they were limited to?
BdizzleFaReal 2 years ago
Wouldn't moving the Pawn from b3 to b4 bring back the queen and rook into defending the center of the board?
phoenixvgr 2 years ago
Could you message me the pgn of the two games?
mariojorge97 2 years ago
1bxd5,nxd5.2.qxe5,bxe5.3kf3+ knight forks the queen
andinirizkyaable 2 years ago
i am talking about the position that this video is discussing.
andinirizkyaable 2 years ago
If Kasparov is playing black why does the title say Kasparov vs. Karpov, or was that just a mistake?
Ratd0g28 2 years ago
It's the title of a video not a PGN file. =)
jrobichess 2 years ago
I understand... Just wondering.
Ratd0g28 2 years ago
Why didn't Karpov capture the pawn with the bishop instead of the knight?
doedicurus 2 years ago
thanks for uploading
simplerhemz 2 years ago
Thanks for checking it out simplehemz!
jrobichess 2 years ago
thnx for uploading
Heredero6 2 years ago
Thanks H!
jrobichess 2 years ago