Added: 4 years ago
From: anthonymilessee
Views: 2,673
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (129)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Eeny Meeny Miny Moe

    Catch some logic by the toe

    If it's Matter let it lay

    In a bucket for a day

    Yet hard & physical it is not

    For Yes is Yes & not: no

    Thus the irrational atheist does not know.

    - Atheists cannot account for the Non-Material, immutable, atemporal Laws of logic, God who is: Non-Material, immutable, atemporal does, thus atheism is self-refuting.

  • yes for hell is locked from the inside by dopey irrational self-loathing miscreants

  • blah blah blah can hardly listen to the sounds of this reject

  • haha??????

  • *Dies of boredom and goes to hell*

  • Atheists rant & rave using logic while raising their limp wrists, nasty dirty hearts shaking their filthy hands at God.

    A. Anti-theists use absolute moral law in their irrational hatred & rants

    B. Anti-theism fails to provide the pre-essentials for absolute laws of morality

    C. Atheism is self-stultifying

    D. God certainly exists

    Don't forget to check your soiled panties or have your

    trans-gendered partner change them

  • theistic epistemology & claims can't be defeated by autonomous opinions and personal experience, nor by empiricism since they examine the mandatory preconditions that make human experience intelligible.

    since the laws of logic are necessary to make experience intelligible, one can't examine mere experience to undermine laws of logic considering intelligible experience presupposes laws of logic. thus A can't be A & Non-A at the time/way. God alone furnishes the preconditions.

  • naeKompoop

    only God supplies all universal necessities and infinite benefits: a certain epistemology, an immutable foundation for the Laws of Logic, propitiation, expiation, and soteriological justification,

    theism is not just much better than the self-stultifying worldview of atheism, forasmuch as atheism is a fallacious worldview for antinomian miscreants; but theism must be true and is certain

  • 1. if ur gonna do a comic video, you should gather an audience. itll seem much funnier. its like george carlin recording an album in a recording studio

    2. keep your bible-thumper shit off youtube

  • LAme much

  • sicko

  • wow so not funny

  • repent and discover a fixed certain and immutable epistemic ground and web of beliefs or stay a loony dim-wit

  • LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. I hope you're dead

  • the laws of logic are universal, unchanging, and non-physical and the physical only, always changing, non-universal cosmos could not produce them nor account for them, only the God of the Bible is universal, unchanging and has universal power, reach and knowledge to ground the necessary laws of logic

  • Religiou people cannot be REASONED with. My fellow Atheists and Secularists, this person is beyond reason, let's focus our energies on the young, in schools and community centers, where they're most vulnerable to the child abuse that is religious indoctrination. And to the poster of this video: I AM a student of logic and philosophy. Your premise is absolutely incorrect. You start with the assumption that absolute morality exists. Huge mistake in logic. Read more and talk less.

  • Did you even think about the fact that you could be wrong to?

  • God didnt blessed you with cracking jokes didnt he

  • more theistic psuedologic stupidity

  • lame

  • atheists hate truth and embrace unreason - sad sad.

    well knucklehead, u as a dopey atheist call it nonsense due to the a posteriori fact that anti-theism lacks epistemic responsibility - so thanks for admitting this and this proves that anti-theism is irrational and self-refuting for girly-men who hate themselves as much as they hate God

  • But how can you hate somethings which one does not consider to exist? Its like saying a person hates unicorns or elves.

    I wouldn't say atheists hate truth, I rather adore it & seek it out daily. To declare god exists is unfounded & without evidence other than faith. Not only that, but to continue on to declare to KNOW what that god(s) likes dislikes is even more absurd & arrogant. Perhaps a god does exist, but so far I see no evidence to support such a concept

  • 1)Why must we assume logic is not simply the anatomy of thought needing no other certainty?

    2) If we do assume logic needs to be grounded in this way, we do we assume it to be god, and not some natural force?

    3) If we do assume that logic need to be grounded in this way, and that that grounding must be god, why would we assume that there is no law of thought that applies to god?

  • i'm laughing ma ass off

  • 1)Why must we assume logic is not simply the anatomy of thought needing no other certainty?

    2) If we do assume logic needs to be grounded in this way, we do we assume it to be god, and not some natural force?

    3) If we do assume that logic need to be grounded in this way, and that that grounding must be god, why would we assume that there is no law of thought that applies to god?

  • Wandering in a vast forest at night, I have only a faint light to guide me. A stranger appears and says to me: "My friend, you should blow out your candle in order to find your way more clearly." This stranger is a theologian. (Denis Diderot)

  • hey knucklehead - wake up, u have been asleep at the wheel of your studies-

    thanks for your self-stultifying non-sense - you dopey anti-theists are a bunch of self-loathing loons

    repent and find expiation, imputation and the preconditions for intelligibility

  • I could never find God. The inveable and make beleive are hard to tell apart. Can you be so kind to point him out to me when you see him.

  • I dedicate this to the late rake and profligate George Carlin - the earth is much better with out his self-hating truth-loathing nefarious soul.

    how is atheism like a wig?

    it's a false-hood.

    Did you hear the one about the atheist twins?

    It's two bad!

    now that the crusty wicked nefarious old profligate Carlin has met The judge and the anti-theists will have to either repent or worship fat-man Hitchens or dopey Dawkins

  • Thomas Edison-Nature is what we know. We do not know the gods of religions. And nature is not kind, or merciful, or loving. If God made me -- the fabled God of the three qualities of which I spoke: mercy, kindness, love -- He also made the fish I catch and eat. And where do His mercy, kindness, and love for that fish come in? No; nature made us -- nature did it all -- not the gods of the religions.[51]

    source is from Wiki

  • the only ground for the necessary preconditions for the invariant, atemporal, universal Laws of logic would have to be able to account for these preconditions, all the false deities fall infinitely short

  • How do they fall short? Last time I checked Islam and Christianity were surprisingly similar.

  • yep atheism is only for alogical profligates who embrace hatred and self-stultifying paradigms - maybe a knucklehead like u can provide the epistemic credentials for for universals and immutables, no u are a kooky atheist and atheism fails the reason test

  • We are supposedly made in his image, yet we still wage wars and kill innocent people. One of the reasons I realized early on. I hope you all aren't as blind as the poster of this video.

  • there is no god but his noodely greatness

  • *ATHEIST invented.

  • Historian Paul Israel has characterized Edison as a "freethinker."[22] Edison was heavily influenced by Thomas Paine's Age of Reason.[22] Edison defended Paine's "scientific deism," saying, "He has been called an atheist, but atheist he was not. Paine believed in a supreme intelligence, as representing the idea which other men often express by the name of deity."[22] In an October 2, 1910 interview in the New York Times Magazine, Edison stated:

  • How many theists does it take to invent a light bulb?

    None; it was invented by a theist.

  • anti-theism is brainwashing for dim-witted profligates who need to repent and escape doom for their miscreant lives

    but b of good cheer, all their rants presuppose God for atheism must employ universals, immutables and the laws of logic which only God supplies

  • HA.....HA.....HA O_o

    that was funny?

  • no one has posited the ontological necessities for the laws of logic and moral law to FSM or Zeus - the claim is he is very strong - kratos - but he lacks asiety which alone can deliver the attributes required therein

  • rrrrrrrrr me heart'ys there be only one true god, one realistic like religion, that be the flyin spaghetti monster,, may ye be touched by his noodly appendage,,,, peace and meatballs to ye all,,, shiver me timbers,

  • AArrrrgggghhh...yo ho ho and a bottle of rum aarrrggghh!

  • I'm starting think the poster of these videos may be on a government / Secret Service list... he seems like the type of guy who would shoot a candidate for having beliefs not in line with his...

  • anthonymilessee, I have never herd so many unjustified opinions.I dont hate anyone,especialy God who I dont believe exist.How theism can be rational if it deny Gods dependence on logic(and rationality is dependence on logic).And If I am wrond that lows or logic are lows of operations on sentences not facts,than where is the fact that "if dog exist than dog exist" and what would it mean that "dog exist and dog doesnt exist"?

  • u as a dopey anti-theist fail to account for the laws of logic but u have to use the laws of logic in our loopy assertions. your self-stultifying atheism just collapses upon itself.

    But be of good cheer all your anti-theistic assertions must use moral law and the laws of logic which required God.

    atheists hate truth and embrace unreason - sad sad

  • This idiot doesnt know that lows of logic are lows of our thinking,not the lows of universe(where in uniwerese i can see that "If dog exist,dog exist"?).Existance of logic prove that there is no God,because what would be the diference between "God exist" and "God doesnt exist" if logic were dependent on God...???!!!

  • well knucklehead, u as a dopey atheist call it nonsense due to the a posteriori fact that anti-theism lacks epistemic responsibility - so thanks for admitting this and this proves that anti-theism is irrational and self-refuting for girly-men who hate themselves as much as they hate God

  • anthonymilessee I havent ever seen so many unjustified opinions at onece.I dont hate anyone,especialy God,who I dont believe in.How theism can be rational if God doesent depend on logic(and rationalizm i dependence on logic).And if logic is not rule of operations on sentences but a fact,than where is the fact that "If dog exist,than dog exist"?

  • anthonymilessee I havent ever seen so many unjustified opinions at onece.I dont hate anyone,especialy God,who I dont believe in.How theism can be rational if God doesent depend on logic(and rationalizm i dependence on logic).And if logic is not rule of operations on sentences but a fact,than where is the fact that "If dog exist,than dog exist"?

  • That moral law? You do not live according to that moral law. That moral law has changed.

    That law appears to not be fixed at all. It seems to me to have changed many many times.

  • "Fixed Moral Law?"

    The one that says its OK to kill people for working on Sunday? The one that says to stone your kids for disobeying? The law that says you should kill a man and his wife for having sex while she is on her period? The one that says you should kill anyone who worships a false idol? The law that would have you kill your daughter if she is not a virgin on he wedding day?

  • No, that's the OLD permanent, fixed and perfect law. It's been changed since then.

  • CaptainZero

    repent and find life, pardon, and rational necessities to account for the laws of logic,or be doomed

  • nRat-girl-000 - wait til u get to hell - there is an eternal waste of your dopey brain and wicked nefarious heart - u hate yourself as much as u hate truth

    repent and find truth, and forgiveness

  • Yes, nrat girl! You're being an idiot for not believing in God's love! Once you're suffering in Hell, you'll know that God loves you! But then it'll be too late, cause as much as God loves you, he won't hesitate to condemn you to eternal torture if you don't love him back.

    You were given free will so you could CHOOSE to love God. Any other use of your free will is forbidden and will be punished.

  • if god loved us,he wouldent let bad things happen,and hell,wtf is the use of earth,we could all be chillin in hevan with god,but,if god loved us,he would force usto beleive,we wouldent know an alternative,so we would all go to heavan,and,wtf happend to all those who were damned during the old testimant days,where for one sin u would burn,and u said it urself,nomatter what,once ur in hell,u cant come out,so,god damned inocent people.that shure is nice of him!

  • u as a dopey anti-theist fail to account for the laws of logic but u have to use the laws of logic in our loopy assertions.

    your self-stultifying atheism just collapses upon itself.

    But be of good cheer all your anti-theistic assertions must use moral law and the laws of logic which required God.

  • Require which god and how? Logic doesn't state if something is true, only if it is consistent, how does that require a God of any sort? Also, what evidence do you have for believing in your deity?

  • You really are delusional if you believe your videos generate 100 000 comments a day.

  • FearOfTruth

    nope - try taking some reading lessons - if a loopy atheist has enough brain power to read anything

    but the goodnews is all your kooky rants presuppose God as they employ universals and immutables which only God accounts for

  • PUBLISH MY COMMENTS

  • FearOfTruth

    well knucklehead, u as a dopey atheist call it nonsense due to the a posteriori fact that anti-theism lacks epistemic responsibility - so thanks for admitting this and this proves that anti-theism is irrational and self-refuting for girly-men who hate themselves as much as they hate God

  • Religion uses argumentum ad ignorantiam,which is completely illogical.I still don't understand why you,a christen ,can not respond without general and personal insults.Maybe this is the affect of the moral laws you refer to.I also don't understand why you are going on a god rant because someone published an anti christen joke.You are lacking in humour my friend.

  • How many christens does it take to screw in a light bulb?Three.One to interpret the ancient handbook,one to declare that the light is good ans one to elevate the bulb to its rightful place on hight.

  • You forgot the 300,000 or so that are absolutely convinced that the ancient handbook is metaphorical and that the light is still shining. You also forgot the 1800 years or so it would take for the great church that is composed of such people to finally admit there's such a thing as light bulbs, that they need to be changed once in a while, and that the old light has gone out.

  • How many theists does it take to censor comments on Youtube?

    All of them. They know they get destroyed in any fair debate.

  • anti-theism is brainwashing for dim-witted profligates who need to repent and escape doom for their miscreant lives

    but b of good cheer, all their rants presuppose God for atheism must employ universals, immutables and the laws of logic which only God supplies

  • You calling an atheist brainwashed is like Pat Hagee calling someone fat.

    By the way, which God? The god of the bible? The one who endorses slavery and the stoning of teenagers and the slaughtering of homosexuals? That one?

  • How many theists does it take to change a light bulb?

    They can't. They're waiting for their oversized David-Copperfield-like sky daddy to do it for them.

  • How many theists does it take to change a light bulb?

    They can't. They're too busy worshipping a wooden man on a couple of sticks on the wall.

  • You're pretty quick to generalize all atheists into one group. I am an atheist but I don't hate people with different perspectives on life. My feeling aren't hurt that you disagree with me, you have every right to disagree with me. Your idea that the Bible is the only standard for logic is flawed because many people disagree with the Bible. What I get from that is logic is made in an individual's mind. And who's to say the Koran isn't the standard for logic?

  • u will look better in a burkah then u do now - so go buy a prayer mat and a bomb vest while supplies last - europe goes to Christ or islam - u and all the dopey atheists help choose

  • thanks that's what all anti-theists say and the christians love them

  • dude youre not funny...

  • because atheists are haters and they lash out when their feelings get hurt

  • I like jokes.If you cant laugh at yourself you have a problem.Come on Christians lighten up.You'll be dead soon.

  • FearOfTruth

    yah right all 2.3 billion and growing at 100,000's a day

    repent for u can feel the heat of your coming doom

  • So you select the views that agree with you.Very honest my friend.

  • Of course, you disable the ratings.

  • This video is a joke!

  • Buddy your awesome, keep on fighting the good fight.

  • how is atheism like a wig?

    it's a false-hood.

    Did you hear the one about the atheist twins?

    It's two bad!

    hey anti-theists, try taking one day off from worshiping Hitchens

  • what do religious people and the mentally retarded have in common?

    everything

  • man fuck you. religion is only bad when its used for war, which is fucking retarded i agree, and any religion that wants money fuck it.

  • finally an anti-theist with a sense of humor - maybe u are humans after all - though many do look like Tarzan, dress like Jane, smell like Cheeta

  • There was a time when theists ruled the world...we know that time period as the dark ages. Ironically (?) only the middle east suffers from this now.

  • repent and find expiation-

    the laws of logic are universal, unchanging, and non-physical and the physical only, always changing, non-universal cosmos could not produce them nor account for them, only the God of the Bible is universal, unchanging and has universal power, reach and knowledge to ground the necessary laws of logic

    trust Christ

  • Athiests have their own holiday. April 1st.

  • lol, what about christmas eve...I like to celebrate the last day before christianity became a problem.

  • Atheists are like:

    Pooper-Scoopers

    Atheists & Pooper-Scoopers both are full of excrement and the atheists have begrimed filthy souls and they always come back for more.

    So they remain full of excrement.

  • Wow your invisible sky daddy must be helping you out with all these jokes. Finally a miracle; a Christian with a sense of humor. Now get down on your knees like a good Christian open your mouth and wait for Jesus Christ's second Cumming.

  • what's the difference between an atheist and a mirror? one speaks without reflecting, and one reflects without speaking.

    Why did the atheist cross the road?

    he didn't since atheism fails to account for the Laws of Logic:

    the road = "A" and the other side "Non-A".

    What do u call a hardened atheist with a half-brain?

    gifted.

  • bunk00 it seems that fear dominates your faint heart, not a vague echo, not just the physiological epinephrine response, but a haunting of your soul that your atheism is fallacious & neurotic, this fear is crystallized in your fear of Christianity and truth

    quit shaking and trembling and just repent

  • Bunk00 thinks that his wicked nefarious soul is tough but his potty mouth belies his fear of truth and he shakes at the sound of a falling leaf .

    I urge you to repent, and find forgiveness for your heart that is full of turpitude and begrimed with intense hatred.

    Then you can answer easy questions and not run in fear

    for you will have an immutable epistemic base, w/o God your tumble into absurdity.

  • god can suck my balls

  • bunk00

    yes we are all impressed by your self-hating irrational emotion-filled rage - it just make your doom more brutal - repent and trust Christ or get all that u deserve as u whimper and whine for eternity

    stop hating logic and your own dark heart

  • bunk00

    Atheism is like Jeeper's Creepers: It's embraced by creepy people such as babri, Brew, BBoy and

    other freaky folks such as Penn, Carlin, wife-stealer B. Russell, Nietzsche who rambled on & on the last few years of his life that he was Jesus. Atheism is arbitrary & self-conflagrated. Theism is true for it alone furnishes all the necessary preconditions for the laws of reason.

  • Atheism is like a Cup with a Hole in the bottom. One can keep pouring water into it, but their brains remain empty, vacuous, and void, inasmuch as Atheism cannot contain or account for the non-physical Laws of Logic. Even when logic enters their brains, the atheists remain self-defeating and impenitent.

    If one comes & declares that He's a god or the way to god, he should provide some evidence

  • Atheism is like Gilligan's Island;

    Like Gilligan, atheists are ignorant and daffy. Intellectually they are stuck going no where and there world view is ship wrecked. Hey Bunk00 - where's the skipper? perhaps he could give u & boyfriends some better direction.

  • Atheists are like:

    Weight-loss drug Alli:

    Atheists & Alli diet drug both produce a lot of excrement and the atheists have begrimed filthy souls like the dieter's undies and they always blast off some more. And it's easy to see who is full of excrement- atheists.

  • reason requires the universal, unchanging, timeless, non-physical laws of logic that require the universal, unchanging, timeless, and non-physical God, hence He lives; and the certain proof comes from your dim-head, and your crooked fingers to your key-board and any and all assertions u make.

  • i assert that the laws of logic is aspatial and timeless - u cant go to Walmart and buy some laws of L on sale - u cant pick them off a bush.

    can u while a man is awake, can u cut open his brain and with a super-high powered micro scope see the Law of non-contradiction? - can u measure the laws of logic in his brain tissue with ultra sensitive instruments?

    only God accounts for the laws of logic and atheists are stuck using them, thus atheism requires theism

  • Religion is for the ignorant, weak minded, and fearful.

  • yes anti-theism is for dopey irrational people who hate themselves as much as they hate truth - you are just 1 more knucklehead doomed and u deserve it because you are a hard-shelled anti-theist who chooses the fight God all the while u must presuppose God exists

  • The laws of logic are non-physical, universal, transcendent & invariant, thus, God, who is non-physical, universal, transcendent & invariant, supplies the needed preconditions for the the laws of logic.

    God inviolably exists.

  • Prove to me that god exists. Then I'll believe, but until that happy day comes, I'll continue my atheistic thoughts. I don't really care if you believe because on inspection of the two above responses, you are either a five year old or someone with an I.Q. under 100.

  • i have on dozens and dozens of comments - take 10 minutes and look over my comments on my vid Nursery Rhymes for Atheists (1st volume).

    and all your assertions use the universal, non-physical, unchanging laws of logic that only the universal, unchanging, non-physical God can account for

  • wow these are sad jokes on many levels but saying that well agentorange said it nicely cuase lets not forget the moral laws of god says to kill children and its ok to a women who was raped

  • nailedByTruth sorry it's not the goo to u by way of the zoo fairy tale u embrace = a frog to a prince without even a kiss.

    How did the atheistic mass-murderer get caught and arrested at a pig farm?

    someone squealed on him.

    Yes anti-theists adopt positions that disallow certainty, necessity, and universality, but this must surrender not just the laws of logic, but epistemology, ontology, ethics and everything that is.

  • wow thats a bad straw man i think venomfangx even stopped using it and all those these are just ingorant if someone who never heard of christ isnt born with the knowledge and all the bs they are still living good lives without jesus

  • i agree - but my serious argument is inescapable.

    the material cosmos can only account for particulars that are always in flux and changing; only an unchanging, non-material God cannot account for the unchanging non-material laws of logic that are required to assert anything.

  • sorry but again i am reeading this when im tired and its hard to think but your saying becuase humans have logic that means theres a god right

  • Why did the atheist cross the road?

    he didn't since atheism fails to account for the Laws of Logic:

    the road = "A" and the other side "Non-A".

    

    What do u call a hardened atheist with a half-brain?

    gifted.

    what's the difference between an atheist and a mirror? one speaks without reflecting, and one reflects without speaking.

  • I'm curious, do you take literal account of the bible, and thus the earth/universe would have to be 6000 years old? do you have evidence to substantiate this? or do you take the geneisis account as alagory, or as a metaphor?

    thanks for doging my question of absolute morality.

  • I'm curious, do you take literal account of the bible, and thus the earth/universe would have to be 6000 years old. do you have evidence to substantiate this? or do you take the geneisis account as alagory, or as a metaphor?

    thanks for doging my question of absolute morality.

  • you don't use any form of logic yourself. So I guess you don't exist :s or something.... I think my brain just commited suicide.

    how can any person come up with such a dumb argument as you

  • Klownie that happens often in the brain boxes of anti-theists - it's hard to try to deceive themselves 24 hours a day - so Bang!

  • "it's hard to try to deceive themselves 24 hours a day"

    Deception. You'd know all about that, wouldn't you? Christ eater.

  • FakeWannaBe4536

    It's clearly obvious that God must exist, unless u are willfully blind, as all anti-theists(false-atheists) are. They employ the laws of logic without the invariant & universal foundation to account for them, hence, every vile communication u vomit out of your anti-theists hearts just mirrors your atheist forefathers (Kim, Stalin, Castro)& your anti-theist presuppositions presupposes & confirms God certainly exists.

  • XxFakeWannaBe

    Don't let the door hit you on your way out - run with fear, but I strongly suggest instead of fearing Logic, that you fear God and repent, for you are a very wicked odious hate-filled profligate and you deserve to have your little heart upset in response to your depraved ministry for u hate yourself as much as u hate truth. God lives & i day u will face the long goodnight.

  • did I just get less... smart? what happened?

  • i affirm the framework hypothesis. it would be very odd that a cogent framework of the creation account would parallel what modern science seems to from a 3500 year old Doc.

    but i try to stick with the lofty things such as universals and necessities & avoid getting bogged down with particulars. Universals are necessary for intelligibility, - both sides of all issues have their apologists who can marshal data that attempts to prove their particulars.

  • how can when you review the bible, or any holly text that touched morality and when we compare it to today's how could you begin to say that morality is absolute and unmoveable and therefor somehow the end of a devine being?

    we as society adjudicate what we condone as moral and associate justice and punishment accordingly.

  • sorry for your missed question - i'm deep into an ancient cosmos position as are most thinking christians.

    moral behavior and moral attitudes and recorded actions are mutable and mistake prone and cannot be the ultimate ground for moral absolutes, only an unchanging source can offer unchanging morals = God.

  • and you dodged the question entirely. please answer, do you take literal account of the bible, and thus the earth/universe would have to be 6000 years old? do you have evidence to substantiate this? or do you take the geneisis account as alagory, or as a metaphor?

    no need for laws of logic blather, just simply yes or no, reasoning and evidence that backs it up. piece.

  • literature is taken as it is properly conveyed - poetic chiasmic hebrew poetry is taken as such and i affirm a very old cosmos and a proper hermeneutic of the bible supports that view - i'm not a Hovind or icr advocate.

  • well that's at least reasuring that you're not a YEC.

    "is it a moral absolute to affirm that morality is relative?"

    society further reafirms our inate morality of goodness/charity onto hummanity. most of us know quite readily that killing without just cause is wrong. as is captitulating on imoral ground.

  • what i am morally against is stuff like gambling b/c it is a non productive, zero sum game, where nothing is produced, and only 1 person benefits at the expense of everyone else and there is no net gain. and the overall detrement that gambling results in is a drag on soceity which should outweigh the parties consenting involved.

  • what's the difference between an atheist and a mirror? one speaks without reflecting, and one reflects without speaking.

    Why is the empty purse owned by the Laws of Logic always the same?

    because there's no change in it.

    The laws of logic are changeless and universal and only a changeless and universal ground, God, can account for them.

    what's the difference between an atheist and a fisherman? One baits his hooks, the other hates his books.

  • b/c you're xtian, do you literally believe in the creation account or do you take it as a metaphore or as alagorical?

    i ask this b/c much of the evidence science can show demonstrates the earth/universe are far older than 6000 years.

    this is the same with many other biblical scientific references which are contrary to what we know.

  • b/c your xtian, do you literally believe in the creation account or do you take it as a metaphore or as alagorical?

    i ask this b/c much of the evidence science can show demonstrates the earth/universe are far older than 6000 years.

  • another i wanna be an intellectual trying to make cartoon stories of religion seem real videos,the reality is the joke is on him it is better to believe in fiction than deal with the reality of life

  • gee, what's your point any figure minus itself is always 0. so 14-14=0, what's your point?

  • boooooooooooooooooo

  • My anti-theist friend knows math.

    yep. I ask him what 14 minus 14 is, and he says nothing.

  • peace anthony: the real joke is on those who force themselves 2 believe in god as belief is not a fact,the fact is you've been tricked without a belief in god your life would b no better,live life & die.fear of death makes us 2 hope 4 better instead of making the quality of life better,u will go back 2 the nothing u came from just like those b 4 you,make a joke out of that

  • Why did the atheist cross the road?

    He didn't. Since His worldview fails to ground the Logical Law of Non-contradiction, so for the consistent atheist, the other side doesn't exist.

  • God alone has the ontological stature and resume' to supply the epistemic environment for the universal, non-physical, changeless and transcendent laws of logic, nope he can't, & u can't, but God who is universal, non-physical, changeless, and transcendent does.

  • Why don't anti-theists eat M&M's?

    they say it takes to long to peel them.

    Why did the anti-theist write TGIF on his shoes?

    Toes Go In First.

  • Each sneeze carries about 5000 droplets that can travel 12 feet - the average anti-theist has 2-3 thoughts in his brain, all filled with hatred and irrational rejection of truth.

  • the average speed of human sneeze is about

    68 MPH - the average speed of an atheist rejecting a true truth claim is 220 MPH.

  • An important aspect of our argument is:

    Take p (A general principle, law, universal, or operational feature of human thinking or human experience)

    q (theistic world view) is the precondition of p.

    q is necessary to explain the possibility of p.

    q is presupposed by p, not merely deduced from p, not merely induced by p, nor merely analogous of p, but q is the presupposition of p.

  • Why is atheism like a wig?

    because it is a false-hood.

  • (II)

    anti-theist: The laws of logic r universal & fixed

    But sir what is their ground?

    anti-theist: There isn't one.

    But theism supplies a ground for the necessary universal & immutable laws of logic. God lives.

  • (I)

    Well that diamond is beautiful, cut to perfection, steely hard, brilliant respendid.

    But sir where did it come from?

    Hey I already told u it is beautiful & brilliant

    Yes u described the diamond, but what is it's source?

    anti-theist: there isn't one.

  • Athist declare that the light dous not exist? eehhhm? How mutch of an idiot are you! Stupid jokes really!

  • I've found most atheists are blind, all the while they know God exists and they either get saved after the evidence: i.e. Ex-atheist Foremost Legal Scholar Simon Greenleaf, Ex-skeptic Lawyer Frank Morrison, Ex-skeptic Josh McDowell, A. Flew, etc... = all theists, Or they just harden and deny deny deny.

  • How many atheists does it take to screw in a Light bulb?

    None, for atheists declare that The Light doesn't exist.

  • EVERYONE HATES YOU

  • Praise be to Jesus, Mohammad and Santa

    "I can sum it all up in three words: Evolution is a lie" Fundy quote of the week

  • Suppose you are right. All the stuff in the Bible is true. He even made Logic.

    But then, say 1000 years ago he , say wished to end his existence. He could it, after all he is God.

    So now he no longer exists. This would at least explain why prayers are no longer answered.

    Even if you "prove" that he grounded Logic, that he lived. why does it follow that he still lives? What if Nietzsche was right and God is dead?

  • How did the atheistic mass-murderer get caught and arrested at a pig farm?

    someone squealed on him.

  • What do you get when you cross an atheist with a bear?

    a blind bear.

  • wow you jokes are so funny i DIDNT laugh once :(

  • Post a Joke or funny quip: Pro or Con for Atheism - or

    Go to my Vid. Atheistic Nursery Rhymes - if you want to debate or exchange thoughts.

  • The Laws of Logic are universals and absolutes that cannot be observed directly, we do not observe the Laws of Logic in matter, you do not watch a Law appear and do its thing.

    The empiricist & rationalist are caught in circular arguments for they lack a transcendental source to ground Laws of L.

    God provides the transcendental source, God lives.

  • 2. R presupposes G, God=G through G's aseity, omniscience, transcendence, immutability, omnipotence,;

    thus G supplies the necessary preconditions for R.

    God necessarily lives.

  • 1. The laws of Logic =Q are necessary but not sufficient for true knowledge of our world =R.

    R require fixed ethics, objective truth, fixed personality, other minds, relations between propositions & an objective world and

    atemporal certainty.

  • yes i will dummy it down for a 21 year-old who doesn't know the difference between different forms & types of logic and the Laws of Logic.

    But all your deductions and inductive assertions presuppose God. Only God can account for the Laws of Logic that bind all u say & do.

  • The age card? Really?

  • "danless

    do you believe that there is certain truth? Do you believe that there is an absolute fixed moral law? Does anything that is not physical exist?"

    This deserves a new thread.

  • "do you believe that there is certain truth?"

    That depends on how you define certain truth. If you mean that there are things that are correct and incorrect, or that there are things that happened or did not happen, then yes. If you mean a code-word for something that you have not yet specifically defined that will lead (through a series of logical steps no doubt!) to the Christian God and only the Christian God, then no.

  • dan: Only the Greater for the Lessor can account for anything or ground therein.

    Thus a non-universal, material, bound to space/time, moving in constant flux Cosmos fails to account for the Laws of Logic.

    You stumble back into your circle of physicalism and you attempt to posit a particular as the solution to a universal.

    Thus you defeat yourself, once again.

  • "Only the Greater for the Lessor can account for anything or ground therein."

    "Thus a non-universal, material, bound to space/time, moving in constant flux Cosmos fails to account for the Laws of Logic."

    You still fail to show how your God is the only thing that can fulfill that.

  • "Do you believe that there is an absolute fixed moral law?"

    I believe in morality as attempting to limit suffering. My definition of suffering is closely related to the capacity for such a thing within a conscious system (a brain, a conscious computer if we could create it). If there is an 'absolute fixed moral law' in the fabric of the universe, humans certainly can't agree on it.

  • "Does anything that is not physical exist?"

    Maybe, but it would be pretty hard for me to detect with my physical senses wouldn't it? Frankly, when anyone claims to know of something not physical, I'm pretty skeptical of it.

  • dan: all the science, science in flux, and pseudo-science that you attempt to posit still must employ the Laws of Thought (Law of Contradiction, Identity, Excluded Middle) which only God (universal, aspatial, atemporal, immaterial, transcendent, invariant) can account for and ground these Laws (they are universal, aspatial, atemporal, immaterial, transcendent, invariant).

    Only the Greater for the Lessor can account for anything or ground therein.

  • "which only God (universal, aspatial, atemporal, immaterial, transcendent, invariant) can account for and ground these Laws (they are universal, aspatial, atemporal, immaterial, transcendent, invariant)."

    See my earlier comments a few posts up. Now who isn't reading previous arguments?