Added: 7 months ago
From: oasisofhealing
Views: 1,456
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sorry about some of the diction and spelling. I was typing hella fast. lol

  • It just goes to the level of variation that your body allows can work with.

    Cause at the end of the day it is simply your immune system that reverses the cancer, and your immune system in helped by these therapies.

    If it was me, I would bank on Lodi before any other, as he is a complete package.

    Gerson is wonderful, but I prefer the "play on the safe side" of low sugar juicing that Hippocrates, Lodi, Karr, Young do.

  • Gerson still works very well, but you need to be in their clinic, as they juice, juice, juice, and it is harder to replicate at home. For example I am reversing a family members cancer off the same nutritional (low sugar, PH etc) principles of Lodi etc, but if I tried to do the same by juicing lots of beets and carrots and sugary apples I would be feeding the cancer. Gerson juice at such high dosage that your immune system is boosted well enough to beat the cancer. 

  • @FoodHoney

    The benefit someone like Lodi is that he understands both camps (oncology and homeopathy/nutrition etc) and picks out the most effective parts. If I had cancer I would go to Lodi even over Hippocrates as he has the IPT and High Dose Vitamin C.

    But Lodi, Hippocrates, PH Miracle- Robert O Young, Kris Carr all work of the same basic PH/immune system strengthening principles and with an emphasis on low sugar as opposed to Gerson who uses carrot, beet juice (high sugar)

  • @FoodHoney

    Good question though. That is the sort of critical thinking that shows you will be able to understand with deeper research on IPT.

    You know IPT must be OK when even the mainstream (who often call it quackery) will use it on child cancer patients cause they know full well it is less damaging.

  • @FoodHoney

    Yeah, you and I and Lodi all know that chemo is a poison that kills cells indiscriminately. Chemo can work even when used in the worst ways in the mainstream oncology, but it is extremely damaging, so IPT (10%) is a smarter way to use that poison and get it's benefits with less damage. At 10% your hair doesn't fall out etc. It is low enough that it is ok. It won't completely counteract the immune system building treatments, as the body is not black or white, it works by degrees.

  • Great video.

  • I'm interested in the comment about giving patients 10% chemotherapy treatment. Doesn't that increase the toxic load for patients and counteract all the positivity that the great nutrition, intravenous vit C and alternative therapies are doing?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more