People on TV should be impartial while doing their jobs, unless there's some kind of exception. This bitch shouts every f***** time, when someone doesn't agree with her, disrespecting the guests, the audience, and her own co-workers, in an European network she would just be fired, but Americans just love reality TV, because that's what she does, she puts on a show!!!
a major percent of America has no idea of the federal reserve being audited by Ron Paul and a few others.. 16 trillion of OUR MONEY secretly bailed out to foreign banks and corps(without Congress being aware) which is then loaned back to our gov with interest. The balance comes from higher taxes we pay. it's really is that simple..... Thats the reason for our failed economy. Most people don't even know.. Sad...
elisabeth ballsack is paid to be right wing and stupid,seriously im not joking. during commercial breaks, the producers pull her over and give her some of the FOX news talking points.
Hey Egghead: Did you just say "they were against the War in Iraq before it even happened"? Are you on something, or, did your Parents drop you on your head when you were a baby? Maybe you're just retarded or something. Anyway, now you can get back to chatting with your intellectually deprived extreme Right Wing War Mongers. Have a nice life stupid! Byezzzzzzzzzzz!!!
Listen, asshole. I'm arguing with a guy who's claiming that the Dems are the "pro-war" party, so I'm giving examples of how they aren't. You have no idea what my personal opinion on the war in Iraq is.
I was thinking more like Bin Laden finally being killed thanks to a competent Commander-In-Chief, WW2, WW1, Korea...and my personal favorite--Civil, where Liberal Americans put Conservative traitors in their place.
"LBJ Vietnam"
You mean the same LBJ that DIDN'T EVEN GET THE NOMINATION FROM HIS OWN PARTY as a result of Vietnam?
Liberals don't tolerate failure...unfortunately, as you demonstrate, we do have to live with them.
Bin Laden would have been killed a couple of months ago regardless of who was president, you trained monkey.
Now you're comparing today's conservatives to the people who supported slavery 150 years ago, as if all of us support slavery right now. That's fucking ridiculous.
As far as LBJ goes, the fact remains that he was a LIBERAL who couldn't get the job done. As far as those other wars go, of course they were won by liberals; they were started by liberals.
There was no Republican president during WW1, WW2, or the Korean war, so Republicans didn't even have the chance to prove that they could win those wars. If you really want to keep going in the past, I can bring up that we won the Spanish-American war under REPUBLICAN President William McKinley.
Anyway, you libs are all over the map. You're anti-war, yet you're touting the Dems as the "War Party."
@Edgehead10075 "there was no GOP pres during WW1, WW2, Korean"
Yes, a real Commander in Chief WINS wars inside of 7 yrs...unlike you pussy conservatives. Thus OBL currently feeding fish, instead of living in a mansion, as he did under Bush.
"Spanish-American war under Pres. McKinley"
You mean the pres. whose election was the beginning of THE PROGRESSIVE ERA in US history? Great example, smart-guy.
"You're anti-war"
No, dumbfuck, we are 'anti-LOSING-wars'...quite unlike you conservative pussies.
Sorry, asshole, but you're not fooling anyone intelligent regarding Bin Laden. No president would have gotten Bin Laden during Bush's presidency, and every president would have gotten Bin Laden in 2011. We got Bin Laden due to our intelligence, not Obama, which is why Obama's poll numbers still suck.
Teddy Roosevelt is considered to be the first progressive president, not McKinley. You must have failed history.
The Dems LOST Vietnam. Na na na na na na! More soldiers died in 'nam than in Iraq.
Libs against losing wars? Is that why they said to cut and run from Iraq and opposed the successful surge, you IDIOT?
Final thing: your failed belief that Democrats always win wars and Republicans don't (already proven wrong with H. W. Bush, McKinley, and LBJ0 would suggest that there's something in the conservative ideology that causes Republicans to lose wars. Please explain, since I can't think of anything in the conservative ideology that's against winning wars.
That's especially since the GOP are the manly party (pro-gun, anti-feminist, anti-gay, pro-war, pro death penalty, let bums die on the street) whereas the Dems are the EMO party. You've been served.
Lol @ Obama having anything to do with getting Bin Laden. Now I've heard everything. Is that why it took him over two years? If Bush was really as incompetent as you say, Obama would have gotten Bin Laden his first day on the job, dumb fuck.
McKinley defeated the CREATIONIST, FAR LEFT WING, SOCIALIST WHACKJOB William Jennings Bryan, who wanted to nationalize everything, in two presidential elections. Lol. How progressive to defeat a progressive!
Oh, and another war won by a conservative: the COLD WAR, won by Ronald Wilson Reagan. Checkmate. The Dems played no role whatsoever in winning that war.
Sorry, but your nonsense that conservatives are the pussies and that Dems are manly just don't fit with your political ideologies. Manly men aren't pro-choice; they tell women what to do. Manly men aren't anti-gun. Manly men aren't against the death penalty. Manly men aren't pro-fag. You lose.
Zero evidence points to Obozo having anything to do with the killing of Bin Laden. It was our intelligence. You lose. Bwahahahahahahahaha! The guy who "caught Bin Laden" won't even be re-elected. Lol, dumbass!
Actually libs are anti-war. They were against the war in Iraq before it even happened, so you can't use the "We were only against it because we were losing" excuse. Check and mate, fag.
The only thing Obozo did was give the order to kill Bin Laden, something that ANY president would have done. What president would have said, "Uh, no, don't kill him," you idiot?
Listen, shithead. I've already proven you wrong with the Persian Gulf War and LBJ's failure in Vietnam. (BTW, it's not Bush's fault that the war in Afghanistan has taken so long. Everyone knows how tough it is to fight there; just ask the Soviets.) Let's say, for a second, though, that you were right. You say that liberals win wars while conservatives don't. Therefore, it follows that their differences in ideology mean different ways of fighting a war.
So, genius, explain to me what specific technique all the liberal presidents used in winning wars that all the conservative presidents failed to use. If you're going to argue that the liberal ideology is what wins wars, please give some specifics. Of course, you won't be able to because you're full of shit.
If you're going to argue that liberals are just plain manlier than conservatives, explain why liberals take the wussy, emo position on every issue (abortion, guns, death penalty, gays, etc.). Conservatives take the manly, un-emo position on every issue. Conservatives = FUCK FEMINISTS, LOVE GUNS, LOVE EXECUTING MURDERERS, ANTI-FAG, and let bums drop dead on the street.
1. Your assertion is wrong, since Bush won the Persian Gulf War in a month while LBJ failed in Vietnam for years.
2. Please explain what liberal presidents do to win wars that conservative presidents don't. Name specifics. (You won't be able to because you're full of shit, and I've already proven it.) Name anything specific that Obozo did to get Bin Laden, other than simply giving the order to kill once he was told that Bin Laden was found.
Only 35% of Americans give Obozo a "great deal of credit" for getting Bin Laden. Most Americans credit the military. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
No, I won't credit the commander-in-chief. Please tell me the specifics of what he did to get Bin Laden. Also, tell me what specific things all Democrat presidents did to win wars that Republican presidents failed to do. You should be able to answer that, that is, if you're not full of shit.
Men win wars, like George H.W. Bush against Iraq. BTW, Obama hasn't won shit. We're still in Afghanistan. Nice try, faggot. Give me specifics, or you're just wasting my time.
The only thing the commander-in-chief did was give the order to kill, something ANY president would have done. Face it; Obama's a bum, and your nonsense about the Democrats being the war party is B.S. since they now fashion themselves as being the anti-war party, dumbass.
My Bush and LBJ examples have already proven your stupid theory wrong.
@Edgehead10075 "commander in chief did was give the order to kill"
And increased assets in Afghanistan & Pakistan.
And went against the original recommendation for an air strike, to specifically order the Seal team in...basically being a 'Commander', unlike the pussy 'I don't think about [Bin Laden]'-GWBush
"Bush & LBJ"
No, neither has anything to do with WW1, WW2, Civil, Spanish-American, Kosovo, Korea, Afghanistan.
Liberals are stronger than conservatives. We have proven it on the battlefield.
Nice try, but nothing Obozo did differently than Bush led to the capture; it was our intelligence that figured out where Bin Laden was. Intelligence was diligently searching for Bin Laden's whereabouts during Bush's presidency. Advances in technology that weren't around years ago helped lead to the capture. You can quote Bush all you want, but the fact is that Bin Laden was being searched for during his presidency.
BTW, your only evidence for conservatives being weak is Bush. Sorry, but one president cannot define an entire ideology. Like I said before, his father easily defeated Saddam. Reagan won the Cold War and bombed Libya. Also, George W. Bush could be said to have won in Iraq because of the surge.
Furthermore, we're still in Afghanistan. Obama hasn't won shit yet.
Reagan won the Cold War by increasing defense spending. He believed in Star Wars, and Gorbachev believed him. Gorbachev was thus forced to sign weapons reduction. Reagan should have won a Nobel Peace Prize.
Reagan armed Afghanistan to fight the U.S.S.R. He armed Saddam to fight Iran. When did he arm Iran? The contras were angels compared to the commie Sandinistas.
I don't listen to Rush or anyone, for that matter. Nice try.
The Kosovo war, like Iraq, was a war crime, btw, so I wouldn't be bragging about it. I already told you that McKinley was center-right. His opponent Bryan was the liberal. McKinely advocated high tariffs (considered conservative pro-business back then) and allowed trusts to grow, MORON.
Liberals are not stronger than conservatives. That's why they take the wussy position on every issue.
Like I said, you can't use ONE president to define an entire ideology, and your Bush example really isn't that good either.
Nice try, junior, and you can't treat LBJ and George H.W. Bush like they don't count, asshole. If Bush defines conservatives as weak, then LBJ defines liberals as weak.
Now, please explain how being a conservative makes one weak. How does being pro-gun, tough on crime, etc. make somebody weak in war? I don't see how the two are related, but you seem to think that there's a correlation, so the onus is on you to explain it.
Just one more thing, to quote Columbo. Let's talk about the Civil War. Of course you're going to make the argument that the liberal Northerners beating the conservative, racist Southerners is proof that liberals are tougher. First of all, I'm insulted, as a modern conservative, to be compared to racist slaveowners and their supporters. Secondly, the North winning had nothing to do with "liberals being tougher."
The CSA was able to fight a defensive war. In order to win, they simply had to not surrender. The North's minuscule numbers advantage was not nearly enough to overcome the defensive advantage the CSA enjoyed. See US vs GB, USSR vs Finland, Vietnam vs China, Vietnam vs France, Vietnam vs US.
Fortunately the conservative traitor's resolve matched their morality.
'Facts'-Much like warfare, just not conservative's strong point.
1. The South surrendered because they were defeated by the North, due to the North's advantages that I brought up. This garbage you keep mentioning that "conservatives are pussies" is out of thin air, and you've yet to explain how being a conservative makes one a pussy in war. Your argument has an uphill battle, since the liberals are the ones who take the pussy, "emo" stance on every issue.
2. You've said nothing to prove that facts aren't the strong point of conservatives.
I can see people saying that Bush was INCOMPETENT, especially with going to war with Iraq without reason and siphoning troops from Afghanistan. To say that he was WEAK, though, just sounds silly. We had fewer troops in Afghanistan, not because of weakness, but because we were fighting two wars.
hasselbeck isnt far right, she is close to obama way out left, she is for big government, wars, ignoring the constitution, the federal reserve, stimulous and bailouts and so on, this is exactly like obama, or olberman, hannity, clinton, mccain and so on, there is zero difference between her dumb views and the dumb views of obama.
@flh1980 an incomplete idiot.... kind of a moron... Good sir please point out the other side of her then, for so far i have seen "a kind of moron" that is in fact a complete idiot, But i have never seen anything intelligent come out of any of the women on "the view"
But it seems you've found some intelligence? please elaborate.
@Eritsasaku "Thanks for sending me that message about my intelligence about Hasselbeck's virl. Yes, I have found some intelligence after fucking both your parents."
You sent this to me as a personal message, and i congratulate you on being FUCKTARDED
I stated we have all found hassleback as an idiot, and you stated she's kind of a moron and an incomplete idiot. So i asked you to elaborate and explain to us how she is intelligent, you responded by saying you had sex with 60+ year olds.
Man..I aint even gonna watch the rest of this video. This show is a joke and is only for women who have no life and just sit at home all day eating pancakes and drooling over men while their husbands work their asses off. Anyone who watches this show with a bunch of washed up fake bitches is just stupid and need to jump in a time machine and abort themselves! DAMN the truth feels good to tell!
This is what right-wingers do. They simply talk outta their ass and lie a lot. I mean, isn't it bad enough that the right-wing is full of elitist racists, they have to be fear-mongerers and liars, too? But, when you have no ideas of your own, you demonize the guy who does, obstruct any progress, then point the finger and be the screamer at the table.
We'd better get the vote out for Obama in 2012, or we're cooked. Righties will never let us leave the war zones - too profitable.
Exactly - and people BELIEVE the crap because it's said on TV (and radio and in print). People trust what is said in the media because they can't believe anyone would blatantly lie into a megaphone, yet it happens every day. The left has NOTHING to compare to the FOX "News" / AM radio pundits. The media is as "liberal" as the conservative corporations that own it.
@AmericaDevil True, however he leads a democratic state and attempts to promote democracy around the world. While he was elected to lead, which I agree, doesn't make this a true democracy, this is a democratic state by ANY government, (Even whatever dictatorship you support) standards.
Hasselbeck is just an idiot like Coulter. There are intelligent Republicans out there, but they refuse to give them any air time. Right wing media gives it to these silly scary Republicans who are attractive to the general public.
oh burn! i will say though i dont always agree with her, elizabeth always comes off as thoughtful, eager to engage in a meaningful dialogue to get to the bottom of things, it's refreshing to see her, though it seems with ANY political debate, facts are the last thing from anyone's mind, most people will just quack like ducks without really researching or thinking, not you too elizabeth! noo!!
Um, "ronfxv"... I hate to be the one to break this to you but... um... there is no "god". Bringing religion into politics is exactly why liberals look down on you conservatives. It just sounds stupid. Then you get all uppity and say that liberals are elitists... because they believe in evolution and... science. It's really just embarrassing.
WTF? Liberals frown upon conservatives for mentioning GOD?
Ted Kennedy quoted bible passages on the senate floor during the healthcare debate exclaimimg that it's the will of the Lotd to help those that are sick.
Even Biden and Obama when ahead and got the Vatican church in Rome to endorse their healthcare bill.
Seperate GOD from politics? liberals are the worse using the phrase, "GOD's divine plan," for opening discussion on the house and senate floor.
@ronfxv-- I'm not getting into politics, but if you want to make an argument, it would serve you not to write "...democrats are to (what?) stupid to know thier (what?) strategy for...and sucking you into a (you mean an?) irreversable (you mean irreversible?) dictatorshipe (the last one speaks for itself)." Just might help with your credibility.
She should of left those Silly Upper East Manhatten TROLLS years ago, they bullied her merely for a difference in beliefs. She Should of moved to FOX years ago!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@martind586 - the reason the democrats make sense to you is because you are a simpleton and the democrats know you are to stupid to know thier strategy for separating you from your constitutional rights of freedom and liberty and sucking you into a irreversable dictatotorshipe.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
For your next dumb comment- You said Republicans claim GOD Is a Republican, I never heard that one but surely you dont think he would support an abortion loving (baby killer) democrat party over a Republican Party do you? Than you asked and said some what in coherently What does Jesus say about the poor? help them,,feed them etc... they seem to want to forget that part!
Liberals are collectivists so obviously you all are idiots as a collective and any video of leftist protests proves how ill informed all of you are.
Jesus freaked out about little things and destroyed temples because of it, if homosexuality really is an abomination and he witnessed it there is no telling what he might have done.
and btw it is you idiots who bring up race with your constant dismissal of opposition as racism.
@ultimatetalesfan19, If homosexuality is a choice and an abomination as you would say, the when are so many species on this planet involved in homosexual sex, and courtship.
I didn't say it was, I said if it was a choice then Jesus would have a great deal of problems with it.
Obviously if it was natural then Jesus would still help them and heal them.
If Homosexuality is not natural then it is purely psychological, it would be very easy for someone to be gay in that situation in places like New Jersey and California where they have gay tolerance and education learning material at a very young age.
@ronfxv Exactly where in the bible does your god mention that abortion is the same as murder? In fact, there is a passage that essentially equates an unborn fetus as property. And apparently, according to your bible, your god is the ultimate abortionist, or did you simply forget about the biblical flood and the plagues and Sodom and Gomorrah? Funny how you don't even know your own religion.
low taxes..etc... well that got us the debt doubled by the last president! Well HE was talking to you and the rest of us to take responsibility to give a hand up to others not handing our responsibility to some corrupt commie dictator wanna be politican to create a phony utopia
that's because he had to do something about the economic crisis. The only thing bush did was send young people to get murdered in a war started by a big lie. funny thing is, if Obama had NOT spent all that money trying to save the economy, you would all be crying about how he didn't do anything. Nothing pleases you pathetic people.
@amydramine -well Amy dumb ass I wouldn't give 2cents for your opinion or of any of those ignorant fools on "the view" including wishy washy Barbra Walters.
@amydramine yea but i guess its there way of trying to get both sides in a debate but she is a bimbo they couldve found someone who is atleast basis her arguments on facts but then again weve seen specially this last year that facts dont seem to matter to republicans they dont have a poblem with lying to people so i dont think anyone should be afraid to call them out on it good vid shame so many people take that trash in without even checking to see if its true
@ultimatetalesfan19 and the idiot republicans don't lie? hmmm...we just had one of the biggest liers in the world for president for 2 terms...he lied about everything and his party still is
Since the 1960s Dems. have taken -the moral high ground- on - clean air, water, safe food, and medicine, fair wages, equal pay, safe work places, Social Security, Medicare, HealthCare, etc. - For the benefit of the majority of Americans not corporatists !
-
And they have not pandered with fear, hypocrisy, hate or racism
Nor falsely claimed the other side un-American less moral. [LOL]
Nor backing Corporate/family elitist 5% - over the other 95%
@mediacritic what the fuck are u talking about? CBS, ABC, MSNBC, NBC, CNN, etc. etc. all pro-liberal stations you idiot, FOX is one of the only conservative stations and are seperate because we know Obama is a lying sack of shit
@pimper347 First of all "pimper" you can go right ahead and choke on my cock. When you're done with that, get it through your thick skull that just because Limbaugh says something 100000000 times, it doesn't make it true.
@mediacritic are you shitting me?? They never call Obama out on anything, they think just because hes the first black president anything he says or does is infallible, liberals are like flies on shit, once one goes on, you all do, so dont accuse me of that. even when libs and dems controlled both houses in congress they still blamed the tea party for absolutely no reason, the news stations you listen to arent news at all but just promotional schemes for obamas horrible policies
@pimper347 The media outlets you list ARE NOT "liberal" (whatever that means, anyway). They are CORPORATE (thus conservative). MSNBC certainly has a few left-wing commentators, but they are kept on a leash. They're tolerated because they have an audience and make money for the company. MSNBC is owned by GE, a major war contractor. Phil Donahue was the highest rated show they had. They fired him. He was staunchly against the Iraq invasion, and war means profit to these treasonous scum.
@mediacritic the point of the matter isnt the news and whatever bias they might be, the point is that Obamas policies are tearing this country to shreads, almost 15 trillion in debt, because the fed keeps printing money and the govt keeps taxing the rich saying they need to pay there "fair share," well hers a news flash for you, the top 2% of rich in this country pay 38% of the country's total tax, the top 10% pay 70%, and the lower 50% pay absolutely NO income tax! As if being succesful is bad
Holy shit. Dude, save your money and buy an education. Limbaugh University has done nothing for you. Those are bullshit GOP talking points right from the fat man's mouth.
BTW - I'd give just about anything to know what your real income is. I smell a "trailer park Republican". I've met so many poor rubes who don't have a pot to piss in but support right wing policies and a regressive tax code simply because they're never exposed to any enlightened point of view. Passive media consumption will not inform you - it will only have you accepting what the corporate media wants you to believe.
@mediacritic You make absolutely no sense, its the poor who support Obamas policies the most because there under this delusion that hes going to make their lives better, and give them free healthcare which we CANT afford, thats why we're in so much debt dumbass, because he takes money out of big and small businesses in the private sector because it will lead us to a govt controlled monopoly system. And I make about 75,000 a year, what's it to you? And FOX is the only channel that s to the right
Asswipe, the reason we're in so much debt is because your man W trumped up a phony war and gave big tax breaks to the idle rich (which created no jobs - and never could). Clinton balanced the budget, and that dumb little phony cowboy W came in and wrecked the place. Now dipshits blame the deficit on Obama. Get your head out of Limbaugh's ass.
@hackit12 Nixon established the EPA, the EEOC, the Supplemental Security Income Program, supported the ERA, and initiated the Philadelphia Plan - the first major affirmative action program. If he was running for President now, he'd be too liberal to win a Democratic primary.
Please watch a funny short film on Youtube. All about funny, bitchy, female friends who come to a sort of an awakening. Made entirely by us women, for women! To find it just type in 'SARAH RYAN DELUDED' be sure to watch all the episodes and feel free to leave us your comments. Thank you for your support.
that must be why Obama's ratings are so low now after we all see the emperor has no cloths, is a Marxist and exaggerating every economy killing move Bush did. But Dems are all gay parading hippies that look to MSNBC witch is controlled by the Democrats for its news. IGNORANT look in the mirror.
What an idiot.
henryg913 1 month ago
People on TV should be impartial while doing their jobs, unless there's some kind of exception. This bitch shouts every f***** time, when someone doesn't agree with her, disrespecting the guests, the audience, and her own co-workers, in an European network she would just be fired, but Americans just love reality TV, because that's what she does, she puts on a show!!!
fglp666 1 month ago
hahhahaha
cowboys430isback 1 month ago
LOL!
"Far Right and Always Wrong."
good one=)
joi12345678 3 months ago
a major percent of America has no idea of the federal reserve being audited by Ron Paul and a few others.. 16 trillion of OUR MONEY secretly bailed out to foreign banks and corps(without Congress being aware) which is then loaned back to our gov with interest. The balance comes from higher taxes we pay. it's really is that simple..... Thats the reason for our failed economy. Most people don't even know.. Sad...
Gtrplyr1 4 months ago
elisabeth ballsack is paid to be right wing and stupid,seriously im not joking. during commercial breaks, the producers pull her over and give her some of the FOX news talking points.
IamAsi94 6 months ago 5
WW2, WW1, Spanish-American, Civil, Kosovo, Bin Laden, Korea.........
On the other hand--Grenada.
I am bested.
Great Argument. Really.
festdir 7 months ago
Hey Egghead: Did you just say "they were against the War in Iraq before it even happened"? Are you on something, or, did your Parents drop you on your head when you were a baby? Maybe you're just retarded or something. Anyway, now you can get back to chatting with your intellectually deprived extreme Right Wing War Mongers. Have a nice life stupid! Byezzzzzzzzzzz!!!
bassimmage 7 months ago
Listen, asshole. I'm arguing with a guy who's claiming that the Dems are the "pro-war" party, so I'm giving examples of how they aren't. You have no idea what my personal opinion on the war in Iraq is.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
fuck republicans ! there all retarded!
funkystonermonkey 7 months ago
You should learn how to spell "they're" before calling other people "retarded."
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 i know how to spell it but its faster not to. i dont need to waste all fucking day on youtube
funkystonermonkey 7 months ago
Yeah, sure. Lol.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 grow up
funkystonermonkey 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I can say the same to you.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Thumbs up if you searched Elisabeth Hasselbeck owned on the view into youtube hahaha
xfrenchfrymanx 8 months ago
This "Dardenne" guy must be a fag. All manly men are conservatives.
Edgehead10075 9 months ago
@Edgehead10075 No. Manly men WIN wars. Unlike conservatives.
festdir 7 months ago
You mean like how conservative George H. W. Bush didn't kick Hussein's ass in the Persian Gulf War?
The generals and soldiers win wars.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Also, LBJ oversaw a huge failure in Vietnam, and he was a liberal.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 "Like how H W Bush in Desert Storm"
I was thinking more like Bin Laden finally being killed thanks to a competent Commander-In-Chief, WW2, WW1, Korea...and my personal favorite--Civil, where Liberal Americans put Conservative traitors in their place.
"LBJ Vietnam"
You mean the same LBJ that DIDN'T EVEN GET THE NOMINATION FROM HIS OWN PARTY as a result of Vietnam?
Liberals don't tolerate failure...unfortunately, as you demonstrate, we do have to live with them.
festdir 7 months ago
Bin Laden would have been killed a couple of months ago regardless of who was president, you trained monkey.
Now you're comparing today's conservatives to the people who supported slavery 150 years ago, as if all of us support slavery right now. That's fucking ridiculous.
As far as LBJ goes, the fact remains that he was a LIBERAL who couldn't get the job done. As far as those other wars go, of course they were won by liberals; they were started by liberals.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
There was no Republican president during WW1, WW2, or the Korean war, so Republicans didn't even have the chance to prove that they could win those wars. If you really want to keep going in the past, I can bring up that we won the Spanish-American war under REPUBLICAN President William McKinley.
Anyway, you libs are all over the map. You're anti-war, yet you're touting the Dems as the "War Party."
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 "there was no GOP pres during WW1, WW2, Korean"
Yes, a real Commander in Chief WINS wars inside of 7 yrs...unlike you pussy conservatives. Thus OBL currently feeding fish, instead of living in a mansion, as he did under Bush.
"Spanish-American war under Pres. McKinley"
You mean the pres. whose election was the beginning of THE PROGRESSIVE ERA in US history? Great example, smart-guy.
"You're anti-war"
No, dumbfuck, we are 'anti-LOSING-wars'...quite unlike you conservative pussies.
festdir 7 months ago
Sorry, asshole, but you're not fooling anyone intelligent regarding Bin Laden. No president would have gotten Bin Laden during Bush's presidency, and every president would have gotten Bin Laden in 2011. We got Bin Laden due to our intelligence, not Obama, which is why Obama's poll numbers still suck.
Teddy Roosevelt is considered to be the first progressive president, not McKinley. You must have failed history.
The Dems LOST Vietnam. Na na na na na na! More soldiers died in 'nam than in Iraq.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Libs against losing wars? Is that why they said to cut and run from Iraq and opposed the successful surge, you IDIOT?
Final thing: your failed belief that Democrats always win wars and Republicans don't (already proven wrong with H. W. Bush, McKinley, and LBJ0 would suggest that there's something in the conservative ideology that causes Republicans to lose wars. Please explain, since I can't think of anything in the conservative ideology that's against winning wars.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
That's especially since the GOP are the manly party (pro-gun, anti-feminist, anti-gay, pro-war, pro death penalty, let bums die on the street) whereas the Dems are the EMO party. You've been served.
Lol @ Obama having anything to do with getting Bin Laden. Now I've heard everything. Is that why it took him over two years? If Bush was really as incompetent as you say, Obama would have gotten Bin Laden his first day on the job, dumb fuck.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
McKinley defeated the CREATIONIST, FAR LEFT WING, SOCIALIST WHACKJOB William Jennings Bryan, who wanted to nationalize everything, in two presidential elections. Lol. How progressive to defeat a progressive!
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Oh, and another war won by a conservative: the COLD WAR, won by Ronald Wilson Reagan. Checkmate. The Dems played no role whatsoever in winning that war.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
BTW, the Afghanistan war is hardly over, even with Bin Laden's death, moron.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Sorry, but your nonsense that conservatives are the pussies and that Dems are manly just don't fit with your political ideologies. Manly men aren't pro-choice; they tell women what to do. Manly men aren't anti-gun. Manly men aren't against the death penalty. Manly men aren't pro-fag. You lose.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
President George H. W. Bush won the Persian Gulf war in a month, dumb fuck, hardly "over seven years." Jebus, you're stupid.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
I don't care if you voted LBJ out. He was still a Democrat who lost a war. Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Zero evidence points to Obozo having anything to do with the killing of Bin Laden. It was our intelligence. You lose. Bwahahahahahahahaha! The guy who "caught Bin Laden" won't even be re-elected. Lol, dumbass!
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Actually libs are anti-war. They were against the war in Iraq before it even happened, so you can't use the "We were only against it because we were losing" excuse. Check and mate, fag.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Most libs also opposed the Persian Gulf War, in which we destroyed Hussein. You lose again, fag. I just love owning you.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Lol. You're done.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
The only thing Obozo did was give the order to kill Bin Laden, something that ANY president would have done. What president would have said, "Uh, no, don't kill him," you idiot?
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Listen, shithead. I've already proven you wrong with the Persian Gulf War and LBJ's failure in Vietnam. (BTW, it's not Bush's fault that the war in Afghanistan has taken so long. Everyone knows how tough it is to fight there; just ask the Soviets.) Let's say, for a second, though, that you were right. You say that liberals win wars while conservatives don't. Therefore, it follows that their differences in ideology mean different ways of fighting a war.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Continued
So, genius, explain to me what specific technique all the liberal presidents used in winning wars that all the conservative presidents failed to use. If you're going to argue that the liberal ideology is what wins wars, please give some specifics. Of course, you won't be able to because you're full of shit.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
If you're going to argue that liberals are just plain manlier than conservatives, explain why liberals take the wussy, emo position on every issue (abortion, guns, death penalty, gays, etc.). Conservatives take the manly, un-emo position on every issue. Conservatives = FUCK FEMINISTS, LOVE GUNS, LOVE EXECUTING MURDERERS, ANTI-FAG, and let bums drop dead on the street.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
So, again, you're full of shit. In conclusion,
1. Your assertion is wrong, since Bush won the Persian Gulf War in a month while LBJ failed in Vietnam for years.
2. Please explain what liberal presidents do to win wars that conservative presidents don't. Name specifics. (You won't be able to because you're full of shit, and I've already proven it.) Name anything specific that Obozo did to get Bin Laden, other than simply giving the order to kill once he was told that Bin Laden was found.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Only 35% of Americans give Obozo a "great deal of credit" for getting Bin Laden. Most Americans credit the military. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 "credit the military"
You mean like the COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF?
You just keep looking at polls, Nancy.
The MEN will just keep WINNING wars.
festdir 7 months ago
No, I won't credit the commander-in-chief. Please tell me the specifics of what he did to get Bin Laden. Also, tell me what specific things all Democrat presidents did to win wars that Republican presidents failed to do. You should be able to answer that, that is, if you're not full of shit.
Men win wars, like George H.W. Bush against Iraq. BTW, Obama hasn't won shit. We're still in Afghanistan. Nice try, faggot. Give me specifics, or you're just wasting my time.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
The only thing the commander-in-chief did was give the order to kill, something ANY president would have done. Face it; Obama's a bum, and your nonsense about the Democrats being the war party is B.S. since they now fashion themselves as being the anti-war party, dumbass.
My Bush and LBJ examples have already proven your stupid theory wrong.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 "commander in chief did was give the order to kill"
And increased assets in Afghanistan & Pakistan.
And went against the original recommendation for an air strike, to specifically order the Seal team in...basically being a 'Commander', unlike the pussy 'I don't think about [Bin Laden]'-GWBush
"Bush & LBJ"
No, neither has anything to do with WW1, WW2, Civil, Spanish-American, Kosovo, Korea, Afghanistan.
Liberals are stronger than conservatives. We have proven it on the battlefield.
festdir 7 months ago
Nice try, but nothing Obozo did differently than Bush led to the capture; it was our intelligence that figured out where Bin Laden was. Intelligence was diligently searching for Bin Laden's whereabouts during Bush's presidency. Advances in technology that weren't around years ago helped lead to the capture. You can quote Bush all you want, but the fact is that Bin Laden was being searched for during his presidency.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
BTW, your only evidence for conservatives being weak is Bush. Sorry, but one president cannot define an entire ideology. Like I said before, his father easily defeated Saddam. Reagan won the Cold War and bombed Libya. Also, George W. Bush could be said to have won in Iraq because of the surge.
Furthermore, we're still in Afghanistan. Obama hasn't won shit yet.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 "Reagan won the Cold war"
Reagan simply followed the Truman Doctrine.
Reagan did, however, run like a coward from Lebanon when 300 Marines were killed. Reagan also armed the Taliban, Iran, Nun-Raping Contras & Saddam.
Is there anything a draft dodging, druggie, triple divorced, radio host can tell you that you wouldn't believe, you easily manipulated moron?
It is no wonder you pussies can't win wars.
festdir 7 months ago
Reagan won the Cold War by increasing defense spending. He believed in Star Wars, and Gorbachev believed him. Gorbachev was thus forced to sign weapons reduction. Reagan should have won a Nobel Peace Prize.
Reagan armed Afghanistan to fight the U.S.S.R. He armed Saddam to fight Iran. When did he arm Iran? The contras were angels compared to the commie Sandinistas.
I don't listen to Rush or anyone, for that matter. Nice try.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
BTW, what does arming other countries have to do with cowardice? Like I said, Reagan bombed Libya, and he also took care of business in Grenada.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
BTW, Winston Churchill, who ALSO won WW2, was a CONSERVATIVE.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
The Kosovo war, like Iraq, was a war crime, btw, so I wouldn't be bragging about it. I already told you that McKinley was center-right. His opponent Bryan was the liberal. McKinely advocated high tariffs (considered conservative pro-business back then) and allowed trusts to grow, MORON.
Liberals are not stronger than conservatives. That's why they take the wussy position on every issue.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Like I said, you can't use ONE president to define an entire ideology, and your Bush example really isn't that good either.
Nice try, junior, and you can't treat LBJ and George H.W. Bush like they don't count, asshole. If Bush defines conservatives as weak, then LBJ defines liberals as weak.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Now, please explain how being a conservative makes one weak. How does being pro-gun, tough on crime, etc. make somebody weak in war? I don't see how the two are related, but you seem to think that there's a correlation, so the onus is on you to explain it.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Just one more thing, to quote Columbo. Let's talk about the Civil War. Of course you're going to make the argument that the liberal Northerners beating the conservative, racist Southerners is proof that liberals are tougher. First of all, I'm insulted, as a modern conservative, to be compared to racist slaveowners and their supporters. Secondly, the North winning had nothing to do with "liberals being tougher."
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
continued
The North had bigger numbers and a huge advantage in manufacturing over the South. Robert E. Lee was hardly "weak." He was actually a great general.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
@Edgehead10075 "North had bigger numbers"
The CSA was able to fight a defensive war. In order to win, they simply had to not surrender. The North's minuscule numbers advantage was not nearly enough to overcome the defensive advantage the CSA enjoyed. See US vs GB, USSR vs Finland, Vietnam vs China, Vietnam vs France, Vietnam vs US.
Fortunately the conservative traitor's resolve matched their morality.
'Facts'-Much like warfare, just not conservative's strong point.
festdir 7 months ago
1. The South surrendered because they were defeated by the North, due to the North's advantages that I brought up. This garbage you keep mentioning that "conservatives are pussies" is out of thin air, and you've yet to explain how being a conservative makes one a pussy in war. Your argument has an uphill battle, since the liberals are the ones who take the pussy, "emo" stance on every issue.
2. You've said nothing to prove that facts aren't the strong point of conservatives.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
I can see people saying that Bush was INCOMPETENT, especially with going to war with Iraq without reason and siphoning troops from Afghanistan. To say that he was WEAK, though, just sounds silly. We had fewer troops in Afghanistan, not because of weakness, but because we were fighting two wars.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
Now that the war in Iraq is winding down, we have the ability to have more troops in Afghanistan.
Edgehead10075 7 months ago
girl claims she knows what she heard when clearly she hasn't, President states what he will do and achieve when clearly he hasn't
Gtrplyr1 10 months ago
I can't hear it
UrbanTheoryComin 11 months ago
LOL! What a dumb ass!
az0963818 11 months ago
LOL in her face
ladyxluckxrulesxok 1 year ago
hasselbeck isnt far right, she is close to obama way out left, she is for big government, wars, ignoring the constitution, the federal reserve, stimulous and bailouts and so on, this is exactly like obama, or olberman, hannity, clinton, mccain and so on, there is zero difference between her dumb views and the dumb views of obama.
slickbtk 1 year ago
Hasselbeck is kind of a moron. like an incomplete idiot.
flh1980 1 year ago 12
@flh1980 an incomplete idiot.... kind of a moron... Good sir please point out the other side of her then, for so far i have seen "a kind of moron" that is in fact a complete idiot, But i have never seen anything intelligent come out of any of the women on "the view"
But it seems you've found some intelligence? please elaborate.
Eritsasaku 1 year ago
@Eritsasaku "Thanks for sending me that message about my intelligence about Hasselbeck's virl. Yes, I have found some intelligence after fucking both your parents."
You sent this to me as a personal message, and i congratulate you on being FUCKTARDED
I stated we have all found hassleback as an idiot, and you stated she's kind of a moron and an incomplete idiot. So i asked you to elaborate and explain to us how she is intelligent, you responded by saying you had sex with 60+ year olds.
Eritsasaku 1 year ago
She's a fucking idiot go fuck your quarterback husband and shut up!
GimmeMyMoney420 1 year ago
Man..I aint even gonna watch the rest of this video. This show is a joke and is only for women who have no life and just sit at home all day eating pancakes and drooling over men while their husbands work their asses off. Anyone who watches this show with a bunch of washed up fake bitches is just stupid and need to jump in a time machine and abort themselves! DAMN the truth feels good to tell!
dumbgirlsaredumb 1 year ago
Assholebeck...complete CUNT...go get your re-PUBIC-an CUNT HAIRS waxed TWAT.
felled 1 year ago 3
This is what right-wingers do. They simply talk outta their ass and lie a lot. I mean, isn't it bad enough that the right-wing is full of elitist racists, they have to be fear-mongerers and liars, too? But, when you have no ideas of your own, you demonize the guy who does, obstruct any progress, then point the finger and be the screamer at the table.
We'd better get the vote out for Obama in 2012, or we're cooked. Righties will never let us leave the war zones - too profitable.
demmmmm1 1 year ago 2
@demmmmm1
Exactly - and people BELIEVE the crap because it's said on TV (and radio and in print). People trust what is said in the media because they can't believe anyone would blatantly lie into a megaphone, yet it happens every day. The left has NOTHING to compare to the FOX "News" / AM radio pundits. The media is as "liberal" as the conservative corporations that own it.
mediacritic 1 year ago
@demmmmm1 I wish I could 'like' this comment a million times
ladyxluckxrulesxok 1 year ago
@ladyxluckxrulesxok One of a million such comments. Republicans are very, very good at coming up with their own “facts."
demmmmm1 1 year ago
She cant hear. Thats the problem. All the dick sucken has made her deaf.
MrRolaids65 1 year ago
she sucks her husband sucks they should just go away
ficklefackle 1 year ago
Who told this woman to talk about such things. She'd be better off in porn.
DmanDice 1 year ago
She's just another teatarded dumbkauf.
LOL
DeucePrez 1 year ago
LOL far right and always wrong xD
anonwillprevail247 1 year ago
Obama has no business talking about democracy.
AmericaDevil 1 year ago 2
@AmericaDevil Being that he leads a democracy I'd say he has some business speaking about it.
EBeckels 1 year ago
@EBeckels You can't 'lead' a democracy...
AmericaDevil 1 year ago
@AmericaDevil True, however he leads a democratic state and attempts to promote democracy around the world. While he was elected to lead, which I agree, doesn't make this a true democracy, this is a democratic state by ANY government, (Even whatever dictatorship you support) standards.
EBeckels 1 year ago
@EBeckels It's a democratic republic, Obama is trying to promote the same kind of republic.
AmericaDevil 1 year ago
@AmericaDevil I agree
EBeckels 1 year ago
haha stupid bitch..
Hakuro10 1 year ago
Comment removed
KillaBlingz 1 year ago
I'm shocked people still believe in this guy...
Hop6236 1 year ago
I don't think I'm one to have a say in politics simply because I'm not educated enough (it's so hard to keep up with) but this is hilarious.
leemcgavinjoey 1 year ago
Hasselbeck is just an idiot like Coulter. There are intelligent Republicans out there, but they refuse to give them any air time. Right wing media gives it to these silly scary Republicans who are attractive to the general public.
jcrewcat 1 year ago
how did her head not explode?
wayneqjr 1 year ago
Walters keeps Hasselbeck around to make an old lady look good.
gailyanne 1 year ago
Ironic Obama would even mention democracy in Cairo, Egypt: the U.S. has supported the Mubarak dictatorship for a long time.
bapyou 1 year ago
inflateyour(right)tires got owned by dardenne and needs to sit down and shut the fuck up like every other 'living in denial' republican.
props to dardenne for posting this vid.
thumbs up peace!
bigbrainbrotha 1 year ago
haha!
DiorPrincessxoxo 1 year ago
My only comment is : I have "ALWAYS HATED Elizabeth Hasselbeck". She has & ALWAYS WILL BE a "STUPID CUNT" !!! PERIOD !!
CKover13 1 year ago
Omg this is amazing haha
floridagurlll 1 year ago
Far left are always wrong too.
jethrodassam 1 year ago
oh burn! i will say though i dont always agree with her, elizabeth always comes off as thoughtful, eager to engage in a meaningful dialogue to get to the bottom of things, it's refreshing to see her, though it seems with ANY political debate, facts are the last thing from anyone's mind, most people will just quack like ducks without really researching or thinking, not you too elizabeth! noo!!
DestinyQx 1 year ago
This woman is a stupid cunt. Regardless of her politics.
lagnaf007 1 year ago 3
Liberal hammer?? Hmm.. lets see how well that hammer will be working Nov 2 2010?
mgallant01 1 year ago
It's not that hard to own Bitsy in a conversation...but still a funny video ;)
cajayson8301 1 year ago
IF Obama says the sky is blue, the Wrong-wingers say it is orange.
-
Even if corrected on it - they stick their noses further up their masters - tails !
Insane !
hackit12 1 year ago 3
lol dumb bitch
MILFHUNTER947 1 year ago
She's such a STUPID IDIOT
xxxLibertinexxx 1 year ago
Seriously, between Hasselback, Palin, and Nancy Grace... people that are actually in the media, and are actually heard.... were fucked!
demosc430 1 year ago
Just have to say thank you!!!
missmoomoo14 1 year ago
Um, "ronfxv"... I hate to be the one to break this to you but... um... there is no "god". Bringing religion into politics is exactly why liberals look down on you conservatives. It just sounds stupid. Then you get all uppity and say that liberals are elitists... because they believe in evolution and... science. It's really just embarrassing.
frymastermeat 2 years ago
WTF? Liberals frown upon conservatives for mentioning GOD?
Ted Kennedy quoted bible passages on the senate floor during the healthcare debate exclaimimg that it's the will of the Lotd to help those that are sick.
Even Biden and Obama when ahead and got the Vatican church in Rome to endorse their healthcare bill.
Seperate GOD from politics? liberals are the worse using the phrase, "GOD's divine plan," for opening discussion on the house and senate floor.
jlane4512 1 year ago
@ronfxv-- I'm not getting into politics, but if you want to make an argument, it would serve you not to write "...democrats are to (what?) stupid to know thier (what?) strategy for...and sucking you into a (you mean an?) irreversable (you mean irreversible?) dictatorshipe (the last one speaks for itself)." Just might help with your credibility.
1972davids 2 years ago
BEAUTIFUL well DOne !!
Be1smaht 2 years ago
She should of left those Silly Upper East Manhatten TROLLS years ago, they bullied her merely for a difference in beliefs. She Should of moved to FOX years ago!!!!
Nimbo1979 2 years ago
Nimbo1979 -'bullied her merely for a difference in beliefs'-
-
Not beliefs [others on the show express their religion and philosophy]
- she spins wrong-wing "complete reverse lies" [for character assassination]
because the sheeple accept the lies and do not seem to care about
- facts and that integrity "stuff".
- she intentionally spins wrong-wing nonsense
- just like this video [perfect example];
hackit12 1 year ago 23
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@martind586 - the reason the democrats make sense to you is because you are a simpleton and the democrats know you are to stupid to know thier strategy for separating you from your constitutional rights of freedom and liberty and sucking you into a irreversable dictatotorshipe.
ronfxv 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
For your next dumb comment- You said Republicans claim GOD Is a Republican, I never heard that one but surely you dont think he would support an abortion loving (baby killer) democrat party over a Republican Party do you? Than you asked and said some what in coherently What does Jesus say about the poor? help them,,feed them etc... they seem to want to forget that part!
ronfxv 2 years ago
@ronfxv - jesus could not possibly approve of the me first neighbor be damned attitude of the Republican Party.
Also, I like to think jesus was fairly bright, which Republicans clearly are not.
Finally, what's up with the war loving you Republicans have built into your brand?
jesus could not possibly be a Republican.
Ooops, I forgot Reps' gay hating, poverty dismissing, gun loving, race baiting....
kaneweb 1 year ago 2
Liberals are collectivists so obviously you all are idiots as a collective and any video of leftist protests proves how ill informed all of you are.
Jesus freaked out about little things and destroyed temples because of it, if homosexuality really is an abomination and he witnessed it there is no telling what he might have done.
and btw it is you idiots who bring up race with your constant dismissal of opposition as racism.
ultimatetalesfan19 1 year ago
@ultimatetalesfan19, If homosexuality is a choice and an abomination as you would say, the when are so many species on this planet involved in homosexual sex, and courtship.
mastro82mp 1 year ago 3
I didn't say it was, I said if it was a choice then Jesus would have a great deal of problems with it.
Obviously if it was natural then Jesus would still help them and heal them.
If Homosexuality is not natural then it is purely psychological, it would be very easy for someone to be gay in that situation in places like New Jersey and California where they have gay tolerance and education learning material at a very young age.
ultimatetalesfan19 1 year ago
@ronfxv Exactly where in the bible does your god mention that abortion is the same as murder? In fact, there is a passage that essentially equates an unborn fetus as property. And apparently, according to your bible, your god is the ultimate abortionist, or did you simply forget about the biblical flood and the plagues and Sodom and Gomorrah? Funny how you don't even know your own religion.
kubush 1 year ago 3
low taxes..etc... well that got us the debt doubled by the last president! Well HE was talking to you and the rest of us to take responsibility to give a hand up to others not handing our responsibility to some corrupt commie dictator wanna be politican to create a phony utopia
ronfxv 2 years ago
In Bushs first year the national debt was increased less than 500 Billion $. Obama increased the national debt over 2 Trillion $ in the first year.
ronfxv 2 years ago
that's because he had to do something about the economic crisis. The only thing bush did was send young people to get murdered in a war started by a big lie. funny thing is, if Obama had NOT spent all that money trying to save the economy, you would all be crying about how he didn't do anything. Nothing pleases you pathetic people.
Yell0wSmileY 1 year ago
How cute. A dumb blonde trying to act intelligent...
weepaul666 2 years ago 7
@weepaul666 How cute, yet another uninformed wanderer who shoots his wad at a puppet.
TheCone79 2 years ago
Are you a dumb blonde? Is that why my comment offended you? How cute! Wow, everything is cute on this page
weepaul666 2 years ago
republicans are all idiots, and i always hated this bitch on view, she never was funny had never anything good to say.
amydramine 2 years ago 7
@amydramine -well Amy dumb ass I wouldn't give 2cents for your opinion or of any of those ignorant fools on "the view" including wishy washy Barbra Walters.
ronfxv 2 years ago
@amydramine yea but i guess its there way of trying to get both sides in a debate but she is a bimbo they couldve found someone who is atleast basis her arguments on facts but then again weve seen specially this last year that facts dont seem to matter to republicans they dont have a poblem with lying to people so i dont think anyone should be afraid to call them out on it good vid shame so many people take that trash in without even checking to see if its true
DeluxBagger 1 year ago
The entire basis on the existence of the modern Democratic party is a lie.
Democrats can't do ANYTHING without lying.
ultimatetalesfan19 1 year ago
@ultimatetalesfan19 and the idiot republicans don't lie? hmmm...we just had one of the biggest liers in the world for president for 2 terms...he lied about everything and his party still is
scarypowers 1 year ago
The biggest liar in the world is Obama, sorry if you are worshiping him too much to actually know that.
ultimatetalesfan19 1 year ago
ultimatetalesfan19 -'entire basis'-
-
Since the 1960s Dems. have taken -the moral high ground- on - clean air, water, safe food, and medicine, fair wages, equal pay, safe work places, Social Security, Medicare, HealthCare, etc. - For the benefit of the majority of Americans not corporatists !
-
And they have not pandered with fear, hypocrisy, hate or racism
Nor falsely claimed the other side un-American less moral. [LOL]
Nor backing Corporate/family elitist 5% - over the other 95%
hackit12 1 year ago 20
@hackit12
What the Dems don't have is a massive media brainwashing apparatus. It's how the right gets 50% the country to vote against their own best interests.
mediacritic 1 year ago 14
@mediacritic what the fuck are u talking about? CBS, ABC, MSNBC, NBC, CNN, etc. etc. all pro-liberal stations you idiot, FOX is one of the only conservative stations and are seperate because we know Obama is a lying sack of shit
pimper347 6 months ago
@pimper347 First of all "pimper" you can go right ahead and choke on my cock. When you're done with that, get it through your thick skull that just because Limbaugh says something 100000000 times, it doesn't make it true.
mediacritic 6 months ago
@mediacritic are you shitting me?? They never call Obama out on anything, they think just because hes the first black president anything he says or does is infallible, liberals are like flies on shit, once one goes on, you all do, so dont accuse me of that. even when libs and dems controlled both houses in congress they still blamed the tea party for absolutely no reason, the news stations you listen to arent news at all but just promotional schemes for obamas horrible policies
pimper347 6 months ago
@pimper347 The media outlets you list ARE NOT "liberal" (whatever that means, anyway). They are CORPORATE (thus conservative). MSNBC certainly has a few left-wing commentators, but they are kept on a leash. They're tolerated because they have an audience and make money for the company. MSNBC is owned by GE, a major war contractor. Phil Donahue was the highest rated show they had. They fired him. He was staunchly against the Iraq invasion, and war means profit to these treasonous scum.
mediacritic 6 months ago
@mediacritic the point of the matter isnt the news and whatever bias they might be, the point is that Obamas policies are tearing this country to shreads, almost 15 trillion in debt, because the fed keeps printing money and the govt keeps taxing the rich saying they need to pay there "fair share," well hers a news flash for you, the top 2% of rich in this country pay 38% of the country's total tax, the top 10% pay 70%, and the lower 50% pay absolutely NO income tax! As if being succesful is bad
pimper347 6 months ago
@pimper347
Holy shit. Dude, save your money and buy an education. Limbaugh University has done nothing for you. Those are bullshit GOP talking points right from the fat man's mouth.
mediacritic 6 months ago 7
Respond to this video...
BTW - I'd give just about anything to know what your real income is. I smell a "trailer park Republican". I've met so many poor rubes who don't have a pot to piss in but support right wing policies and a regressive tax code simply because they're never exposed to any enlightened point of view. Passive media consumption will not inform you - it will only have you accepting what the corporate media wants you to believe.
mediacritic 6 months ago
@mediacritic You make absolutely no sense, its the poor who support Obamas policies the most because there under this delusion that hes going to make their lives better, and give them free healthcare which we CANT afford, thats why we're in so much debt dumbass, because he takes money out of big and small businesses in the private sector because it will lead us to a govt controlled monopoly system. And I make about 75,000 a year, what's it to you? And FOX is the only channel that s to the right
pimper347 6 months ago
@pimper347
Asswipe, the reason we're in so much debt is because your man W trumped up a phony war and gave big tax breaks to the idle rich (which created no jobs - and never could). Clinton balanced the budget, and that dumb little phony cowboy W came in and wrecked the place. Now dipshits blame the deficit on Obama. Get your head out of Limbaugh's ass.
mediacritic 5 months ago 2
@hackit12 a-motherfucking-men!!!
theEricWalker 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hackit12 Nixon established the EPA, the EEOC, the Supplemental Security Income Program, supported the ERA, and initiated the Philadelphia Plan - the first major affirmative action program. If he was running for President now, he'd be too liberal to win a Democratic primary.
NotADood 1 year ago
dumbass.....
da1supreme 2 years ago
its weird that when i hear democrats talk,,it all makes sense what they say about the other side! - And i catch the republicans lying!
But i guess if u r a republican they could probably say the same thing!
the kicker for me is..republicans claim god is a republican..etc..etc.. well then,,what does jesus say about the poor!
help them,,feed them etc... they seem to want to forget that part!
low taxes..etc... well that got us the debt doubled by the last president!
martind586 2 years ago 7
@martind586 Brovo....
scarypowers 1 year ago
Either she doesnt have her facts straight, or shes a flat out liar! - which by the way is typical for a right winged republican
DollarBill26 2 years ago 6
Hasselbeck is a moron. I wish they'd just put her out of her misery already an get her a brain that works.
FuckYouLetMeLogIn 2 years ago 7
Please watch a funny short film on Youtube. All about funny, bitchy, female friends who come to a sort of an awakening. Made entirely by us women, for women! To find it just type in 'SARAH RYAN DELUDED' be sure to watch all the episodes and feel free to leave us your comments. Thank you for your support.
SarahRyan2002 2 years ago
Republicans are generally racist, ignorant, repugnant and most likely inbred.
mycanadafirst 2 years ago 8
that must be why Obama's ratings are so low now after we all see the emperor has no cloths, is a Marxist and exaggerating every economy killing move Bush did. But Dems are all gay parading hippies that look to MSNBC witch is controlled by the Democrats for its news. IGNORANT look in the mirror.
walthomas 2 years ago
After reading your comment I can only assume youre mentally challenged. Its not really your fault, inbreeding will do that!
mycanadafirst 2 years ago
that would be anti white Democrats.
ultimatetalesfan19 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Liberals are dumb, so looking forward to elections in 2010 and pres. elecection in 2012 Obama is a one termer!!
Jimologyx 2 years ago
Right GO Palin!!!! haha
freddy4646 2 years ago
Change you can't Believe!!! looool.
Jimologyx 2 years ago
FUCK PALIN!!!!!!
nlwilliams1 2 years ago 3
IMBECILE!!!
virtualdiabolik 2 years ago
I'd still bone Hasselbeck even though she's a far right Repugnican. My dong is part of it's own "independent party".
ChipDunkle9781 2 years ago 3
LOL, Nice Comment Chipster
xetlive 2 years ago
She's so frustrating to watch.
dalefmitchell 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
SnorklinWithCudas 2 years ago