Lol I actually saw some comments about icebergs! seriously if this ship hit an iceberg it would crunch the iceberrg not even budging the ship nor causing any damage. trust me I was building it.
I don't think this ship has any kind of ice class. While it probably wouldn't sink in such case, I'm quite sure that it would be the ship that "crunches", not the iceberg. Steel is not that strong and even ships with ice class get damaged due to ice conditions every now and then.
Any ship that sails should have enough lifeboats on each side of the ship for all the crew and passengers. If a ship heels over to one side it is almost impossible to get lifeboats away from the side that is pointing to the sky. So the question is: "Does this ship have enough lifeboats on the port or starboard side to take all the souls on board?"
Lifeboats? No. Inflatable life rafts? Yes. Contrary to popular belief shipbuilders can't fool IMO and the classification societies (in this case DNV), especially when it comes to safety.
There is a major problem with Life Rafts and that is getting into them. When I worked in the Merchant Navy some 35 years ago we were well aware of the problem and that on a ship that only had 300 souls on board. Is one expected to jump in the sea from that monster or are they sort of raft that you get into and then it is dropped into the sea. The latter procedure is dangerous with people that know what they are doing let alone near 6,000 passangers that do not have a clue.
Yeah, getting on the liferafts from the sea can be a challenge, even for the able-bodied. I'll perhaps get a chance to make an excursion to a training facility to try that...
I guess they have those inflatable escape slides at the muster stations, a bit like the ones in airplanes.
I wonder what are the acceptable losses when evacuating a ship of that size, i.e. how long the evacuation is considered successiful...
of course not, and that is not nescassary either. The lifeboats can be lovered if the ship lists to on of the sides. You want twice as much lifeboats as needed OMG that would take at least two more decks of window cabins! lool
look at the proportion of those life boats with the ship and then compar it to another R.C ship those life boats r HUGE n jus bcuz u cant c more dont mean ther no der...
I believe SOLAS (Safety Of Life At Sea) has a lot to do with the design, number and launch capability. I remember seeing a RCCL video on the unique launch system for these new extra large life boats which enables them to be launched at fairly steep angles while the ship is listing.
Typically ships are not designed to have enough life boats on one side to allow for all passengers, however there is a factor for the total number of life boats and inflatables well beyond the total capacity.
For the most part, unless my math is wrong.. the way the lifeboats and stuff are set up, 5 people would ultimately be left behind.. but that's assuming that people wouldn't squeeze in or make room for others.
The lifeboats, biggest ever, have a capacity of 300-something passengers. There are inflatable rafts as well, so there's no need to fit everyone in the boats.
They had to built telescope chimneys on the boat that costed around 12 million just to get under this bridge. The brigde is the 3rd biggest bridge in the world. But its gonna travel around in caribbean where there arent so many bridges
Rus9. What the hell are you talking about?? He said that this is fake. LOLLED! The ship will have the maximun power up, and lowers the pipes. Then the ship will go "under" the sea and then it goes under the bridge. This ship is the biggest in the world. There is no other. When the bridge is over, they get the pipes up and lowers the speed. That's the technic.
they clearly don't build bridges for these kinds of ships. either they have to reduce the height of ships or they have to build bridges a lot higher. I guess it's a compromise between how often they have to let through giant ships and how much money to spend on a bridge. thankfully Oasis can sail deeper into the ocean.
Fact - If California were to join the European Union; it would be the 2nd largest economy in the E.U. behind Germany. Even in it's current economic state.
Uh no, France the UK and Italy are considerably larger in total GDP than California is . As they should be they all have around 60 million inhabitants compared to the 38 million California has. California is closer to Spain in GDP (but quite a bit bigger. Still I'd happily have Cali join the EU even with their debt, lol.
The smokestack was build so they could decrease the lenght. When they decresed the smokestack would the ship be able to pass trow with 15 cm left. The captain also incread 15 cm more with going with full speed. So they would 9have 30 cm to pass.
It's not a waste of money if it produces more money than it cost. And I think there are many people in the US that want to cruise on worlds largest ship.
it is not fake....dis is 50% larger then the previous largest and owned by royal carribean...my bro is tryin to get into dat cruise in d food and beverage department...soo itz fake...n stop tellin if u dont have any idea..
If I didn't see the bridge, I would of classified that object as a UFO. A big hovering UFO in the sky. LOL I'm sure it's not entirely ludacris to mistake it as a UFO if you saw a clip of this shot from a far and thought the camera was pointed at the sky.
No - there is no wide strait left or right to the bridge. I am living only 5 km from the bridge - so thats the only way to get out from Finland to the Carribians.
Less than 2 feet to spare and it only cleared, because they got telescopic smoke stacks on that sucker. Pretty neat, eh? They were crusin under that bridge like they wanted to bash through it.
It is a Finland built ship, bought by a mainly Norwegian owned shipping company, propelled by a Swedish electrical engine, passing under a bridge in Denmark
Don't forget that the shipyard is owned by a Korean company, there were quite many Estonian and Russian workers and the engines were (probably) assembled in Italy...
The company that bought, owns and operates this magnificently huge ship is to a large extent Norwegian, though I don't know who actually owns the company, currently, but my question still remains: Why did they go under the bridge?! There's a perfectly fine 3 km wide strait with no bridging, only slightly left of this similarly magnificent bridge. The quite mad people operating it decided to lower it (somehow?), go at full speed so that it would lower even more, with half a metre left between_O
Where, exactly, is that strait? I live in Denmark, and I've crossed all three straits that exist to get to open seas from Finland. Crossed all three of them by bridge, so I would really like to know where you think that is?
Sorry people, there have been many videos on this and many of them confuse it for the Øresund Bridge, but I did very much realise that this is indeed not it... But why didn't it go there?!
Royal Caribbean International was founded in 1968 out of the three: Anders Wilhelmsen & Company, I.M. Skaugen & Company and Gotaas Larsen, all Norwegian shipping companies, it's first ship was called "Song of Norway", all of which are reasons why I said that it was "to a large extent a Norwegian company", for I never denied it being listed American, or it's headquarters to be in Florida, and I very clearly said that I did not know who, and I quote: "actually owns the company, currently".
We are not talking about what USED to be ... we are talking about what IS ... and that would be the fact that Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. is headed by an AMERICAN and the company is HEADQUARTERED in the United States. RCI is Norwegian/American but for all intents and purposes, as of 2009, its an American corporation.
OK OK OK OK i never ever said that it wasn't "an American corporation".
I simply said:
"These are just some reasons why I said it was *to a large extent* a Norwegian company".
Because it was founded in Norway by Norwegians who united three of their Norwegian shipping companies. That is why I said it was "*to a large extent Norwegian*"
AND I MADE A SMILEY ON MY LAST COMMENT!
But that has really nothing to do with.. anything.
This I said in a comment: "all of which are reasons why I said that it was to a large extent a Norwegian company, for I never denied it being American"
But yet you say-: "We are not talking about what USED to be.. we are talking about what IS.. and that would be the fact that Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. is headed by an AMERICAN"
-as *if* I disagreed with you about it being American ..... The why so uppity?!
ships that awesome should have a rocket pack to clear the bridge. just press the red button and FWOOOSH. no problem, except a few hot tubs might empty.
Mycket dra.. MICAHAEL WINCENTZ.. Detta video är som en länk på många tidingar.. i alla fall finska tidingar.. Unik i sitt slag.. både video och båten. Made in Finland.. Made in Norden,, Made in Europa.
We went under this bridge in June of this year on the Jewel of the Seas. We only had several feet clearance ourselves !! Great video ! Kathy in Los Angeles
Oh! And i will add to that comment that.... i really am jealous and envious about this cruise ship... all those people are so lucky... i can't myself go on a cruise like this now but someday i will.... GOD! That ship is so fucking big!!! I wanna go to an cruise with it dammit!!!!! ;(
Finland got 90 million DKK in compensation fromDenmark when the bridge was built, becaue there's not room enough for big offshore oil platforms built in inland t go under the bridge.
Finlinad sued Demark in 1991 at the International Court of Justice. But ehy made the 90 million DKK settlement outside court in 1992.
Yay for Denmark
Messiboy1997 7 months ago
If this thing had crashed into the bridge.. oh my god!
mynamebestname 9 months ago
Made in Finland.. the country with the most fucked up language in the world
TokiThor 9 months ago
great result of swedish engineering
jepuni 1 year ago
ooh awesome ship, and built in sweden.
Jomb3 1 year ago
@Jomb3 Fail. Built in Finland.
HMSa77 1 year ago
It was on it's maiden journey to Miami from Turku, Finland. Bought by Royal caribbean.
theisrandersen 1 year ago
when do it come to storebælt??
Multi1033 1 year ago
2009 had the worlds largest cruise ship and the worlds tallest structure. Wonder what 2010 is going to bring? :-)
sangolt88 2 years ago
Comment removed
tupsumato 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World's largest skyscraper fire and the worst maritime disaster? ;-)
tupsumato 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol I actually saw some comments about icebergs! seriously if this ship hit an iceberg it would crunch the iceberrg not even budging the ship nor causing any damage. trust me I was building it.
sweSUCKS 2 years ago
I don't think this ship has any kind of ice class. While it probably wouldn't sink in such case, I'm quite sure that it would be the ship that "crunches", not the iceberg. Steel is not that strong and even ships with ice class get damaged due to ice conditions every now and then.
tupsumato 1 year ago
the was 15 inces between the bridge and the ship!!!
GreenD37 2 years ago
Made in Finland, Madeee in Finlaaand.
ArDeZe 2 years ago 2
They are using Chutes Not slides that needs les Space and can evacuate more poeple. About 450 persons in 45 minuts.
schiffsimer 2 years ago
Any ship that sails should have enough lifeboats on each side of the ship for all the crew and passengers. If a ship heels over to one side it is almost impossible to get lifeboats away from the side that is pointing to the sky. So the question is: "Does this ship have enough lifeboats on the port or starboard side to take all the souls on board?"
littlebigbrain 2 years ago
Lifeboats? No. Inflatable life rafts? Yes. Contrary to popular belief shipbuilders can't fool IMO and the classification societies (in this case DNV), especially when it comes to safety.
tupsumato 2 years ago
There is a major problem with Life Rafts and that is getting into them. When I worked in the Merchant Navy some 35 years ago we were well aware of the problem and that on a ship that only had 300 souls on board. Is one expected to jump in the sea from that monster or are they sort of raft that you get into and then it is dropped into the sea. The latter procedure is dangerous with people that know what they are doing let alone near 6,000 passangers that do not have a clue.
littlebigbrain 2 years ago
Yeah, getting on the liferafts from the sea can be a challenge, even for the able-bodied. I'll perhaps get a chance to make an excursion to a training facility to try that...
I guess they have those inflatable escape slides at the muster stations, a bit like the ones in airplanes.
I wonder what are the acceptable losses when evacuating a ship of that size, i.e. how long the evacuation is considered successiful...
tupsumato 2 years ago
of course not, and that is not nescassary either. The lifeboats can be lovered if the ship lists to on of the sides. You want twice as much lifeboats as needed OMG that would take at least two more decks of window cabins! lool
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
loosing the ship itself would be the absolute worst thing
ATITANIC1992 2 years ago
i agree wit u but then i thought
look at the proportion of those life boats with the ship and then compar it to another R.C ship those life boats r HUGE n jus bcuz u cant c more dont mean ther no der...
akelodmc 2 years ago
I believe SOLAS (Safety Of Life At Sea) has a lot to do with the design, number and launch capability. I remember seeing a RCCL video on the unique launch system for these new extra large life boats which enables them to be launched at fairly steep angles while the ship is listing.
Typically ships are not designed to have enough life boats on one side to allow for all passengers, however there is a factor for the total number of life boats and inflatables well beyond the total capacity.
RCCLDisney 2 years ago
For the most part, unless my math is wrong.. the way the lifeboats and stuff are set up, 5 people would ultimately be left behind.. but that's assuming that people wouldn't squeeze in or make room for others.
JaymeTakineth 2 years ago
Made in Turku, the oldest town in Finland.
Golorga 2 years ago 3
Would some please explain the following ratio: 6300 passengers/2165 crew/18 lifeboats. 470 people to a lifeboat?
grendel305 2 years ago
The lifeboats, biggest ever, have a capacity of 300-something passengers. There are inflatable rafts as well, so there's no need to fit everyone in the boats.
tupsumato 2 years ago
do the math it works fine
KurtandLaurenw 2 years ago
They had to built telescope chimneys on the boat that costed around 12 million just to get under this bridge. The brigde is the 3rd biggest bridge in the world. But its gonna travel around in caribbean where there arent so many bridges
shitmike123 2 years ago
tommosen pikku veneen ne pojat kyhäs...
Sorbus69 2 years ago
By the way denerm this isn't the biggest ship..... this is the biggest cruise ship... :)
brollyhero99 2 years ago
Comment removed
JahManFin 2 years ago
Of course "Swreden" has nothing to do with this (:
youknoowamh 2 years ago 3
heyy is that blue thing a transformers logo???
lgnij 2 years ago
Rus9. What the hell are you talking about?? He said that this is fake. LOLLED! The ship will have the maximun power up, and lowers the pipes. Then the ship will go "under" the sea and then it goes under the bridge. This ship is the biggest in the world. There is no other. When the bridge is over, they get the pipes up and lowers the speed. That's the technic.
Swordmaster146 2 years ago
nice ,, vr nice !
ramiycos 2 years ago
Jesus christ, I really thought it was going to hit the bridge.
vardsmith 2 years ago 2
they clearly don't build bridges for these kinds of ships. either they have to reduce the height of ships or they have to build bridges a lot higher. I guess it's a compromise between how often they have to let through giant ships and how much money to spend on a bridge. thankfully Oasis can sail deeper into the ocean.
saivert 2 years ago
Denmark-Sweden-Finland-Norwegan. NORDIC POWER.
siitossonnilaukkualm 2 years ago 9
win
sweettemptation21 2 years ago
Thank god they payed for it!
Othewise us Finns would have been forced to buy it. I understand Rccl doesn't quite make ends meet.
joedancer1978 2 years ago
Comment removed
tupsumato 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, we could've converted it into a cruiseferry for the Helsinki-Stockholm route :)
tupsumato 2 years ago
@joedancer1978 oh shut up party pooper..
we made it happen. thats all that counts..Its there Its done. of course i would want it to sail a bit more.... yes...
maybe the oasis of the seas will change the figures a little bit?
this should show that we can deliver.
Lametaste 2 years ago
Made In Finland
Careica 2 years ago 16
Very very nice ship but the QM2 is still the most gracious.
CoyJune 2 years ago
@CoyJune Shut the fuck up ya poofter
bushnballs 2 years ago
Finnish work<3
FinPro 2 years ago 3
thats insane... imagine if it failed..... i dont even want to....
secretrevolution294 2 years ago
ahaha!,. go girl!
pjfuertes152 2 years ago
It's like a moving city.
christmanpunch 2 years ago
A gig on this ship ? Let me sign the contract !
Fili2009able 2 years ago
sk8 planet earth is on that ship!
sirnicholson 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my videos are beats this does not stand a chance. IF YOU SUBSCRIBE TO ME YOU WILL BE ENTERED IN A CONTEST TO WIN AN BRAND NEW WII AND WII FIT
spyagents1 2 years ago
I want to go on this cruise soooo bad!!!
bsmittyy 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
i told my boyfriend to eat pineapple juice before we do it next time, guess why?
lizlena789 2 years ago
why?
pjfuertes152 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
me have korn stock in tooth
sobscibe and have simpaty for me pain me feeel
fomms op onli
hoove
cowfootXB 2 years ago
add and sub plz
lespaultyler 2 years ago
LOL!!!!! "Citizens of the US are out of money"
What a dumbass comment.
Fact - If California were to join the European Union; it would be the 2nd largest economy in the E.U. behind Germany. Even in it's current economic state.
ccf22p 2 years ago
you fail at economics
skat0r 2 years ago
Uh no, France the UK and Italy are considerably larger in total GDP than California is . As they should be they all have around 60 million inhabitants compared to the 38 million California has. California is closer to Spain in GDP (but quite a bit bigger. Still I'd happily have Cali join the EU even with their debt, lol.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
France for example had 2.9 trillion GDP in 2008. Cali is about 1.7. So that's a huge difference right there.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Made in Finland
faded74 2 years ago 6
real close call
Mackan712 2 years ago
there was 2 chopper filming it.. but can find the vids
tbaforlife 2 years ago
Cool video but I think it would be better if they had a camera on the bridge
SomeGuy578 2 years ago
there are videos onboard
Whielmaa 2 years ago
Holy shit that is one big Decepticon.
derpenstein 2 years ago 3
That thing is almost as big as my yacht
IamNivi 2 years ago
you must have a small yacht. My yacht is at least twice as big.
joathann 2 years ago
FFIIIINNLAAAAND!!
Ronttimus 2 years ago 4
The smokestack was build so they could decrease the lenght. When they decresed the smokestack would the ship be able to pass trow with 15 cm left. The captain also incread 15 cm more with going with full speed. So they would 9have 30 cm to pass.
(Bridge 65 M)
(The boat oasis 72m above water line)
Aleks8812 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They need to make that bridge hgher so the Poles can make even bigger ships lol.
StreetGlowMusashi 2 years ago
Its the Finns who made it. :)
tapaniw 2 years ago 3
Joo tiedän, ehkä Suomessa, but I'm guessing over half of the builders came from Poland or Estonia lol.
StreetGlowMusashi 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is FAKE!!! this cant be true!! Manipulating bitches!!
skotten90 2 years ago
Its true :)
tapaniw 2 years ago
this is real my friend its all over tv and the web
cdrodri77 2 years ago
goodl camera ftw.
Teverty 2 years ago
It's a Decepticon! Look at the blue glowing emblem! The're headed to Ft.Lauderdale, call the Autobots!
mulzi1981 2 years ago 4
the logo does look kind of like the deceptacon logo. lol...
xmadnessmanx 2 years ago 2
i saw the ship a couple of times when they were building and testdriving it. would have liked to see this as well. the captain made quite a job.
saku5000 2 years ago
you're the God? lol xD
thehazeleyz 2 years ago
It's not a waste of money if it produces more money than it cost. And I think there are many people in the US that want to cruise on worlds largest ship.
trueilarim 2 years ago
Sorry to tell you this TRUE, but citizens in the US are out of MONEY!!
maniax342002 2 years ago
is Bill Gates out of money? Is Oprah?
Sure the Vanderbilts might be but we got more OLD MONEY people here (US) than anywhere in the world....
:)
vanishingtorch 2 years ago
are you jk we have like the most money inthe world. are economy is down and people are losing jobs but we still have the most money
caketastesgood 2 years ago
Are you kidding me? It's called CREDIT. I don't count that as money. Plus, the tides are shifting to the East anyway. So don't pound your chest.
maniax342002 2 years ago
Fuck you "fakers", it´s real! GOD DAMN IT!
Pellentior 2 years ago 2
Beautiful lady! Hope she would pay a visit to Singapore(Asia) , Thanks.
tankulai 2 years ago
it is not fake....dis is 50% larger then the previous largest and owned by royal carribean...my bro is tryin to get into dat cruise in d food and beverage department...soo itz fake...n stop tellin if u dont have any idea..
xeryio 2 years ago 2
its not fake !! Read newspapers!!
punaporo 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not real
isoza 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FAKE!!!! u can c from the pixels
lolocaust900 2 years ago
you fucking idiot it was real it was in the news over were in north europe you damn nutjob.!!!
dalemino207 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
STFU! Everyone knows it's fake, it's been all over the internet.
lolocaust900 2 years ago
what a fake ? wake up and get real. the ship and the video i REAL!! i was there among 2 thousund peopel
denernem 2 years ago
Can someone tell me what is the point of making these passenger ships this big?
maniax342002 2 years ago
It's cheaper to build one big ship than two smaller ones and the overall fuel consumption and other running costs are probably lower as well.
Being "the biggest" also attracts people.
tupsumato 2 years ago 2
Thank you.
maniax342002 2 years ago
ITS NOT FUCKING FAKE ITS MADE HER IN MY COUNTRY FINLAND MY DAD WAS ONE OF WORKERS ! please stop saying "fake"
OutganGG 2 years ago 4
Oh, come on. I saw the ship in Turku couple of times. You could clearly see the pixels...
tupsumato 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That was waaay to close to the bridge!!! Come to my channel to see me scare the crap out of my girlfriend!!!
TheLuckyNumberKevin 2 years ago 2
city on water
Solari24 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Worldwide SINGLE CHARTS ...JUST ON MY CHANNEL !!!
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Ukraine, UK, U.S.A.
every weekend the fresh Top 10...
cu on yourmusicchartsTV
yourmusicchartsTV 2 years ago
real- came within 2 feet of the bridge
stevencp 2 years ago
bet it leaves a few turds in its wake.
gizakiss 2 years ago 2
If I didn't see the bridge, I would of classified that object as a UFO. A big hovering UFO in the sky. LOL I'm sure it's not entirely ludacris to mistake it as a UFO if you saw a clip of this shot from a far and thought the camera was pointed at the sky.
chinesemusicDJ 2 years ago
I tip my hat to the captain of that vessel, damn fine sailing mate.
NorCalSurf 2 years ago
My misses is going on this ship later this month
neurocidesakiwi 2 years ago
that...ship...is...freaking....HUGE!!! I can't wait to try it on my honeymoon!
hornetknight 2 years ago
There is actually a another video, filmed onboard
it is titled: "Oasis of the Seas Passing under the Oresund bridge"
Search it!
mitro72 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
who likes girls in tight jeans? My boy says its hot as hell
susanlarissa3228 2 years ago
They should just build a ship the size of mount everest.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
@pahico
No - there is no wide strait left or right to the bridge. I am living only 5 km from the bridge - so thats the only way to get out from Finland to the Carribians.
kaarepedersen 2 years ago 3
lol, this ship has a City on it.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago
I second jx14aby :)
hondaboii89 2 years ago
heh, if you didnt know it looked like he was trying to ram the bridge
justsopitted 2 years ago
There is a reason for that:
Full speed it runs deeper in a water.
This size of a ship is able to go under that bridge on a low tide and a full speed.
mitro72 2 years ago 6
^^ It was reply to "justsopitted"
mitro72 2 years ago
Hehe yup... like i was trying to say if you didnt know better.... ;-)
justsopitted 2 years ago
Less than 2 feet to spare and it only cleared, because they got telescopic smoke stacks on that sucker. Pretty neat, eh? They were crusin under that bridge like they wanted to bash through it.
5stringofFernandoSor 2 years ago 2
World's largest PASSENGER vessel. Not world's largest ship.
teqwc 2 years ago 3
Go Finland!!!
Micaiyah 2 years ago 4
Pricetag 1000000000€!
Hapesky 2 years ago
i wonder how much is it to gon on this ship
sistematic1 2 years ago
Clearly, more than you can afford.
5stringofFernandoSor 2 years ago
Good thing it wasn't high tide
calvinjohnson4god 2 years ago
man...less than 2 feet to spare
FacebookMeOnMyspace 2 years ago
is this ship "oasis of the Seas" was built and ready for the coming of december 21, 2012 "Earth Doomsday?" (-.-)
games4u2ube 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They made great job in Sweden! This is a beautiful ship. -John
TheJohn976 2 years ago
MADE IN FINLAND
faei 2 years ago
It is a Finland built ship, bought by a mainly Norwegian owned shipping company, propelled by a Swedish electrical engine, passing under a bridge in Denmark
ubuntulinux710 2 years ago 6
with Icelandic bottled water on board
AGuyFromMississippi 2 years ago 3
Don't forget that the shipyard is owned by a Korean company, there were quite many Estonian and Russian workers and the engines were (probably) assembled in Italy...
tupsumato 2 years ago
But it was made in Finland
pall3r0 2 years ago 11
What a beautiful ship! Hats off to all the ''FINS'' who constructed this masterpiece!
SICKEMBOY760 2 years ago
thats what they said about the titanic
Prolocater 2 years ago
Right, but the Titanic, in reality, was built poorly.
aSASa45454 2 years ago 2
I don't know that but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt
Prolocater 2 years ago
I think it was in a History Channel documentary. Something about the bolts.. not being done properly.
aSASa45454 2 years ago 2
This ship is actually made by the Finnish company Nokia which is mostly known for making robots and baguettes.
amazingtrevor 2 years ago
i heard it barely cleared it and they had to lower the smokestacks
Myles397 2 years ago
Made in Finland <3
TheTintle 2 years ago
our north neibours sure know how to build a ship!
marx355 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeeaaah made in Fiiinland not Aaamerica.. Amerca suuucks Finland rooockss
BUT WHY DIDN'T IT GO ON THE TUNNEL SIDE?!
pahico 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who do you think paid for it? that's right, 'mericans.
captainLAGER 2 years ago
The company that bought, owns and operates this magnificently huge ship is to a large extent Norwegian, though I don't know who actually owns the company, currently, but my question still remains: Why did they go under the bridge?! There's a perfectly fine 3 km wide strait with no bridging, only slightly left of this similarly magnificent bridge. The quite mad people operating it decided to lower it (somehow?), go at full speed so that it would lower even more, with half a metre left between_O
pahico 2 years ago
Where, exactly, is that strait? I live in Denmark, and I've crossed all three straits that exist to get to open seas from Finland. Crossed all three of them by bridge, so I would really like to know where you think that is?
DhaeKnight 2 years ago
The oresund strait is between Malmo, sweden and copenhagen, Denmark.
Whitechoclax 2 years ago
the one next to wal-mart... you dont live in Denmark!
stevencp 2 years ago
Sorry people, there have been many videos on this and many of them confuse it for the Øresund Bridge, but I did very much realise that this is indeed not it... But why didn't it go there?!
static . panoramio . com/photos/original/2423768 . jpg
There, over the tunnel.. Because it wasn't deep enough? Or something?
The Storebælt bridge is very pretty aswell :)
pahico 2 years ago
I'm guessing the reason is that the free height under the øresund bridge is 57 meters - while the Storebælt bridge has 65 meters... ;-)
DhaeKnight 2 years ago
Yes Øresund is not deep enough above the tunnel.
ITubeTooInc 2 years ago
Royal Caribbean is listed as an "American" company and it's headquartered in Miami, Florida USA.
Neno8403 2 years ago
Royal Caribbean International was founded in 1968 out of the three: Anders Wilhelmsen & Company, I.M. Skaugen & Company and Gotaas Larsen, all Norwegian shipping companies, it's first ship was called "Song of Norway", all of which are reasons why I said that it was "to a large extent a Norwegian company", for I never denied it being listed American, or it's headquarters to be in Florida, and I very clearly said that I did not know who, and I quote: "actually owns the company, currently".
:]
pahico 2 years ago
Oh, and:
It was started by Norwegian companies and Norwegians still have ownership in it. And it is on the Oslo stock echange in Norway.
These are just some more reasons why I said it was "to a large extent a Norwegian company".
pahico 2 years ago
We are not talking about what USED to be ... we are talking about what IS ... and that would be the fact that Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. is headed by an AMERICAN and the company is HEADQUARTERED in the United States. RCI is Norwegian/American but for all intents and purposes, as of 2009, its an American corporation.
Neno8403 2 years ago
OK OK OK OK i never ever said that it wasn't "an American corporation".
I simply said:
"These are just some reasons why I said it was *to a large extent* a Norwegian company".
Because it was founded in Norway by Norwegians who united three of their Norwegian shipping companies. That is why I said it was "*to a large extent Norwegian*"
AND I MADE A SMILEY ON MY LAST COMMENT!
But that has really nothing to do with.. anything.
Here's anotherone! :D
:] <--
It's identical to the other one.
pahico 2 years ago
This I said in a comment: "all of which are reasons why I said that it was to a large extent a Norwegian company, for I never denied it being American"
But yet you say-: "We are not talking about what USED to be.. we are talking about what IS.. and that would be the fact that Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. is headed by an AMERICAN"
-as *if* I disagreed with you about it being American ..... The why so uppity?!
pahico 2 years ago
Because the water isn't deep enough?
tupsumato 2 years ago 2
made in finland<3
TuhottuViha 2 years ago
ships that awesome should have a rocket pack to clear the bridge. just press the red button and FWOOOSH. no problem, except a few hot tubs might empty.
uberscheisse 2 years ago
that ship is like 5 times bigger than Titanic. man what a tradgedy it would have been if it didn't make it.
jackpotz1980 2 years ago
Mycket dra.. MICAHAEL WINCENTZ.. Detta video är som en länk på många tidingar.. i alla fall finska tidingar.. Unik i sitt slag.. både video och båten. Made in Finland.. Made in Norden,, Made in Europa.
siitossonnilaukkualm 2 years ago
We went under this bridge in June of this year on the Jewel of the Seas. We only had several feet clearance ourselves !! Great video ! Kathy in Los Angeles
kkroll5 2 years ago
Made in Finland.. ;)
kristumuksu 2 years ago 5
ohh stod ved siden af ham der optog :P det var koldt og det skulle haver været der 4 timer tidligere... men det kom!!
tbaforlife 2 years ago
Neej... Glemte at komme ud og se det... Godt et kamera er opfundet ;-)
VOLVOFH16FAN 2 years ago
Not small =)
jonta7 2 years ago
Oh! And i will add to that comment that.... i really am jealous and envious about this cruise ship... all those people are so lucky... i can't myself go on a cruise like this now but someday i will.... GOD! That ship is so fucking big!!! I wanna go to an cruise with it dammit!!!!! ;(
brollyhero99 2 years ago
its the bigest in the world.. we were so lucky in little denmark that is passed us :D
tbaforlife 2 years ago
Made in Finland. :)
brollyhero99 2 years ago 5
I seen that ship yesterday
armstronglugter 2 years ago
If we lose a contract in Finland just because of that bridge I hope we ask our friend Putin to shoot it down for us
termis69 2 years ago
Finland got 90 million DKK in compensation fromDenmark when the bridge was built, becaue there's not room enough for big offshore oil platforms built in inland t go under the bridge.
Finlinad sued Demark in 1991 at the International Court of Justice. But ehy made the 90 million DKK settlement outside court in 1992.
ITubeTooInc 2 years ago
worlds largest PASSENGER ship, important distinction
Blarbo 2 years ago 5