She is: "a journalist who saw that there were some unanswered questions about physics, and particularly quantum physics"
What they're finding now (with more sophisticated equipment) ...is the ability to measure what is going on, and we're finding out that things...are in a much more malleable state.
There's a "huge body of physicists" that believe we can influence matter with our minds.
The present is contingent on future circumstances.
You can't apply the effects of quantum mechanics to macroscopic objects. If you do that, you're betraying a deep misunderstanding of the science. What McTaggart is doing is seizing on vague similarities between quantum principles and things in the realworld and spinning it into New Age hogwash.
I'd rather get my science from scientists, thanks.
@ANewHuman and what makes u think that science as we know is completely correct ...not ur mistake we have been kept from knowledge ... for eg. the big bang theory tells us about the beginning of earth(also given in the bible) and it is so flawed that when they applied the same characteristics to another theory called cycle theory all characteristics were explained without blunders...it just depends on what we believe in and its all soon gonna change
Firstly, the Big Bang theory describes the beginning of the universe, not the Earth.
Secondly, the fact that live almost 50 years longer than we used to thanks to medicine, that we can communicate at the speed of light and can send spacecraft to Neptune with to-the-second accuracy suggests that science is at least getting something right. Science can't tell us everything, but it doesn't pretend to be able to.
Belief can change hardly anything. Ask any inmate at an insane asylum.
@JAK3FARR3LL Googling "The Cycle" returns an amateur film ostensibly about dating and a blog that asserts that there's a relationship between general relativity and your brain. At least one of those are absurd.
If this "Cycle Theory" really exists, then it's hidden very well. And if it really reveals what you claim it does, wouldn't you say that it's in our best interests that you provide us with more information?
@JAK3FARR3LL Nearly forgot, and just for interest's sake: Tacking the word "Theory" onto any old idea doesn't make that idea valid.
In science, "Theory" doesn't mean the same thing it does in ordinary language. For an idea (an hypothesis) to become a theory in science, it has to be supported by mountains of evidence and be able to explain real world phenomena accurately.
Some things that are called "theories" today (such as the "theory" of Intelligent Design) do not fit this description.
Thanks for sharing this video. In particular, I'm glad to know some of the fascinating solar research mentioned from 13 minutes and 14 seconds forward, and in particular the blurb at about 14 minutes and 8 seconds about sungazing and intention experiments. Thanks. I've been a sungazer for 6 years and enjoyed every moment of it.
Isn't this voodoo science, or am I confusing two different things here? I think Robert Park would call this voodoo science. I want this to be true, but how can I believe it if it's just a story telling without any proof. It looks like they wanna cheer us up with false beleifs.
Readers of The Field, I would like to ask you something, you probably understood this better than me. In The Field there is a chapter about Karl Lashly and Karl Pibram who discovered that there are no specific function areas in the brain. How was it then possible that Phineas Gage, who got a metal tube trough his brain, completely had another personality afterwards?
@larbo1616 Because when in pain and unconsious and people say things then that can have a big effect on the peson - rather like hypnotism. Also, sometimes the being just leaves the body and another one comes along.
@colwilpro I don't accept that as an argument. People are easily tricked by their brains. NDE-s have big effects on people, too. Still, this is no proof that their experience is real. Drugs like DMT could cause experiences like that.
What ? I don't know whether to laugh or cry ! Complete bullshit - no understanding of science. Spouting pseudo-science in order to manipulate and exploit the vulnerable. This is nothing more than a sales pitch for a cult. Guess what - she has books and videos to sell as well. Oh and a disgusting manipulative website (wddty) full of conspiracy theories and lies about health all with the "intention" of making money out of vulnerable people. She is a disgusting evil woman.
@anivegmin Really? I'm not trying to start an argument btw, but what exactly do you think is is being dishonest about or she is misinformed about? Are you a physicist or something? I'm curious because having studied this kind of thing for years, I am skeptical, but remain open minded. Can you know, really be certain, that she is not correct?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Absolutely full of shit! lol! I can tell just by looking at these people that they are full of shit! The only 'intention' here is to make money out of tragically gullible (usually american) people with zero understanding of science. Both this woman and that mawkish freak clearly have not a single clue what on earth they are talking about! They sound like comedians doing a spoof of themselves! Lol!
Its Nutty! but its amazing when its starts to make a bit of sense. Read " THE FIELD" its a great parallel of science and spirit. I've always been on both side of the fence but her book has offered a space for both to exist. With Great proof in actual studies, just read it.
But when somebody discovers a new comet. That has not brought the comet in to existance. It's existed for millions, perhaps billions of years. It's just never passed close to the Earth before? I don't get the observing/bringing into being thing! No one has ever observed my heart before. But I sure hope that it exists!
She had my interest until she brought up the Near Death stuff. That's when it went from Science to Ghost stories. Then again, I should have expected it when a journalist, instead of a physicist is explaining physics.
There is so massive amount of evidence about NDEs and OBEs that even the most hard boiled sceptics can't ignored that, if they want to use a bit common sense. The phenomenon is there, it's different subject to argue how they can be interpreted.
No, actually there's not. Not as a real physical phenomenon where a soul can actually leave his/her body. Just consider it. If someone could OBE they would be the richest, most powerful person in the World. Eavesdrop on the Corporate boardroom for stock tips. Check out what Vladamir Putin is doing and sell the info. It could be so easily proven. Just ghost out and tell everyone what color panties Angelina Jolie is wearing. Sure, the mental states have a reality--but no more real than dreams.
I meant that the phenomenon exist. Whether is has something to do with our physically perceived universe is something to talk about. If you study a bit what people who have OBEs frequently are telling us, you understand that the problem is not that straight forward.
Of course they report on astral dimensions that we have no means to confirm by instruments yet. BUt interesting anectode is that some have made a map for themselves about these worlds. If these would be just random mental noise, the idea of map would be useless?
There is also another dimension that they report. That level has something to do with our physical reality, but it's not totally consisntent with it. They descripe it as a mental projection of physical world. And skillful people are indeed capable to get some information about distant objects.
@ANewHuman As a layman who interested these subjects i can only point you to literature about the subjects. If you are not yet done so, please watch Dean Radin's google talk. he talks about taboo in science regarding to PSI studies, and he presents those studies as well. In the end is very good Q&A with skeptical audience.
From 6:22 - 17:10 I find difficult to comprehend. How was that possible to have the even take place 10 years before the praying? I just can't get my head around it so if someone could clear that up for me that would be great. Oh and my outrageous question is: Will it really take all 6-7 Billion of us to be collectively thinking positively on say global warming for it to be remedied? Is their a specific number of beings and their consciousnesses to be praying and if so what is it?
It's difficult to comprehend because it defies everyday human reality -- which are brains evolved to make "common" sense of. The key for your understanding is to consider HUMAN reality is not the OBJECTIVE reality of the Universe; how things truly are...
Because how things truly are, based on the evidence (i.e. influencing Random Event Generators backwards in time), is that "time" is probably created by your consciousness; that the past, present, future, are illusory.
So, my only advice is to shift your perspective in order to fit the data. There are also more theoretical papers on retrocausality to be found on the internet. Just as one can't put a square peg through a round hole, you won't be able to comprehend how this can be possible if you stick to an ordinary view of reality.
As to coherent groups of intending people, I would be cautious since there could be unintended consequences (i.e. a deep freeze, worst case scenario).
I'm not so sure about that. He needs to"agree" a lot less and just let his guest make their point. I am interested in his guests but find it very hard to set through an entire interview. It's almost as if he uses his guests as a way of getting personal therapy. Notice how know matter what the subject is how he will set there and nod his head and speak under his breath then when he asks a question it will deal with a personal issue of his. Besides being an uncontrollable flame the guy is a flake.
intent in consciousness is its own discourse. stoping trains or improving math grades are subjective goals, thought is the world we know but doesnt carry direct weight when wishing for an improved world while declining to have collectives at your table for coffee. recognizing that it is each one of us contributing to intent that makes life horrors must become our true question: can we surrender our intent that harms on all levels? if so then good intent wont be the elusive commodity
A Cohiba cigar, a nice back porch and a glass of Coppola Claret.
What is so complicated about this stuff? The road to happiness is not allowing people to dump their baggage on you for making stupid mistakes in their lives.
It isn't complicated people! NOW DROP DOWN AND GIVE ME 20.
Now send me $29.95 and I can prophosize one thing...you will be out $29.95.
The Pharoah's of Egypt had it right; dump on them and you die.
it is plausible that someone who 'nearly' dies is not actually dead therefore, they are still alive, so following from that does it sound unreasonable that someone could still hear things going on! also the observer?? in order to observe a particle in a test experiment, you have to interact with it in some way we are observing it yes, but we observe it by shining light on it, etc therefore the 'wave function' collapses because something interacts with the particle.
As for the observer - yes, you have re-stated the observer effect accurately. It was derived from Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle which stated that you cannot know an electrons position and velocity at any given point in space/time, only one or the other, due to the fact that making the observation to see where it is or how fast it is moving changes it's position or velocity by bouncing a photon (light particle) off it.
Thank you Lynne and New Realities. Not to beat the 2012 thing to death but, the sun's 11 year cycle will peak on the proposed date and according to what she says about the sun's magnetic fields, that may mean something like us actually living our intention during a huge magnetic sun storm...
No you dont have to die to find love but you have to die to find the truth.if we were GODS we wouldnt need to die every one would be in control.But thats not the case life although seems meaningless death is enevitable.You will die. if given a choice you would choose to live forever but you cant!doesnt that tell you something? Isac newton,albert einstein and may tried so hard to find what lynn is trying and failed.still you dont understand
God to me is love.thats how i describe him.the fact that science is still searching for whatever they are searching for must tell you something.science will search forever.... but mark my words when you die you will find the truth.
You don't have to die to find love. so when you "say thats how i describe him". You are buying into a conditioned mythology. Actually the whole word God should be thrown out, I think there is just feeling and consciousness. Lynne is trying to define that. Science has made the world easier to live in. it just needs to continuously redefine itself and not settle on what it thinks it knows. People need to do the same. So think for yourself.
Too me its so simple they used the wrong path and obviously went about it the very (long) way.you as a person know how to eat ,you know how to speak you know exactly whats in your wardrobe and it didnt take you a life time to figure it out.why are scientist still searching! how come we are consciousness but still looking for that which we cant find? The answer is simple WE ARE NOT IN CONTROLE OF EVERYTHING.Thats the truth for we cant be GODS and play tricks on ourselfs now can we?
Sure you can if you're blind or deaf to what's going on inside your home. Our minds are possessed by our thoughts and our egos and it's only when we calm the mind through meditation and living in the present moment that we can really feel who we truely are.
You say--- "Science has made the world easier to live in."
You, yes you, are buying into a conditioned mythology. So think for yourself.
The Same problems of ((WAR, GREED, WEALTH GAP, WASTEFUL DESTRUCTION OF NATURE)) are growing larger in magnitude as Scientists take the same "all knowing" approach that religious powers abused long ago.
Yep, but we are all brothers and sisters. And Everything is integrated. All things that are alive are inter connected, and there is no seperation. God is still God. Adam and Eve before the fall is my intent on what I'm getting at and Jesus is our way through to the Kingdom connection of energies. All is One under the One that is the Son. God is still God.
@Jammsbro1 We have the spirit of God within us yes,but we are not Gods,we are his children just as you have your father`s genes, although you are one in a sense you are not him for you both have different finger prints.You have some of him yes but you are not him.We are God`s children we are not God in every respect.
These kind of intention experiments are nothing new.Dean Radin is a pioneer in the field and has already achieved significant positive results.These experiments are ongoing :"The global conciousness experiment" for example.
Nevertheless i think its great that you are pushing this topic as it is more important for us than many people are willing to accept or believe.:-)
interesting stuff. we would be interested to hear what you think of our own brand of intention experiments. one way or another all our clips are such experiments.
because you are woefully contemporary and subscribe to it a name that has been used for what 5 years? do some research instead instead embarassing yourself.
o.k. im secretly willing and visualizing your woefully asinine gullible ass throwing your money away on some charlatan guru. is it working? is it working? as for the name what do you mean? my youtube name? who gives a shit its a youtube name. ive got better outlets for my creativity than my youtube name. you no doubt visualize yourself as an un-contemporary man of the future, superior to me and most people. what does it feel like to condescend "in the now".
I never spent money on the book moron. read my post. I described it as woefully contemporary. What IT DESCRIBES though, albiet in a confused and oversimplified manner, did work to answer your question you snarky little ignorant yes man.
im much more open than you think. ive been reading about this stuff for a very long time but as yet remain unconvinced. its just wishful thinking to me. id like it to be true. you can intend all you want to but i think your environment and phsiology play a much more significant role.
"but as yet remain unconvinced" implies that you were unconvinced while trying to learn it, which means you had already made up your mind without even giving it a fair trial, which means you got the results you expected.
simply not true. saying i remain unconviced means i wasn't to begin with and still am not it dosent' mean i intended the whole time to be unconvinced why would i bother paying any attention at all if i was not interested in other possible points of view. as for "yes man" what/who am i the yes man for. i get it. everyone who doesn't live in a land of make-believe like SFwizonmyface is a yes man
intention is lyk 100% will noting can stop you but what see means is that tinks cheage when your in the right mod so whats your probleem meaby see is right
shes discribeing what people have known for a very long time have any of you ever seen the secret ? what thats what that is and the way u intend it to youself is very much the same
modern science is observing & explaining what mystics have known since ancient times...will we be the civilization that fully comprehends this condition of existence & accepts the responsibility for our intentions & actions, applying our energy with reverence?...
Lynn talks about retroactively affecting people in a grocery store to walk more often in a certain direction. I find the most fun situation to do these kinds of experiments is on a dance floor, preferably one filled with people who dance as a means of self expression, such as at a 'rave'. Everyone there is already moving in response to their subconscious so it's much easier to influence people's motions and the results can be much more amusing than a simple change in walking direction. Try it!:)
This has been flagged as spam show
Please have a haircut, and try to find a job, it will be good for you, quit being a con men!!
Your face is a face of one alcohol abuser!!
ginofrater 3 months ago
Awful...
She is: "a journalist who saw that there were some unanswered questions about physics, and particularly quantum physics"
What they're finding now (with more sophisticated equipment) ...is the ability to measure what is going on, and we're finding out that things...are in a much more malleable state.
There's a "huge body of physicists" that believe we can influence matter with our minds.
The present is contingent on future circumstances.
She can "amplify" intention.
RobertYourell 6 months ago
Comment removed
RobertYourell 6 months ago
"It's too bad somebody saw him." Hahahaha. I first found this guy annoying but he's grown on me.
zoeyjusko 9 months ago
Great Work WOW
brooklynmagi 11 months ago
A very interesting interview from a quantum physics point of view.
And... there is no God because we are God. Hahhhahahhaaaa...
155qwerty155 1 year ago
Comment removed
155qwerty155 1 year ago
this interviewer dont know shit lol
DaM3DGe 1 year ago
What nonsense!
You can't apply the effects of quantum mechanics to macroscopic objects. If you do that, you're betraying a deep misunderstanding of the science. What McTaggart is doing is seizing on vague similarities between quantum principles and things in the realworld and spinning it into New Age hogwash.
I'd rather get my science from scientists, thanks.
ANewHuman 1 year ago
@ANewHuman and what makes u think that science as we know is completely correct ...not ur mistake we have been kept from knowledge ... for eg. the big bang theory tells us about the beginning of earth(also given in the bible) and it is so flawed that when they applied the same characteristics to another theory called cycle theory all characteristics were explained without blunders...it just depends on what we believe in and its all soon gonna change
JAK3FARR3LL 1 year ago
@JAK3FARR3LL
Firstly, the Big Bang theory describes the beginning of the universe, not the Earth.
Secondly, the fact that live almost 50 years longer than we used to thanks to medicine, that we can communicate at the speed of light and can send spacecraft to Neptune with to-the-second accuracy suggests that science is at least getting something right. Science can't tell us everything, but it doesn't pretend to be able to.
Belief can change hardly anything. Ask any inmate at an insane asylum.
ANewHuman 1 year ago
@JAK3FARR3LL Googling "The Cycle" returns an amateur film ostensibly about dating and a blog that asserts that there's a relationship between general relativity and your brain. At least one of those are absurd.
If this "Cycle Theory" really exists, then it's hidden very well. And if it really reveals what you claim it does, wouldn't you say that it's in our best interests that you provide us with more information?
ANewHuman 1 year ago
@JAK3FARR3LL Nearly forgot, and just for interest's sake: Tacking the word "Theory" onto any old idea doesn't make that idea valid.
In science, "Theory" doesn't mean the same thing it does in ordinary language. For an idea (an hypothesis) to become a theory in science, it has to be supported by mountains of evidence and be able to explain real world phenomena accurately.
Some things that are called "theories" today (such as the "theory" of Intelligent Design) do not fit this description.
ANewHuman 1 year ago
"I see all things as I would have them be," Perception follows judgment. Having judged, you therefore see what you would look upon. ACIM lesson 312
claudelebel55 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing this video. In particular, I'm glad to know some of the fascinating solar research mentioned from 13 minutes and 14 seconds forward, and in particular the blurb at about 14 minutes and 8 seconds about sungazing and intention experiments. Thanks. I've been a sungazer for 6 years and enjoyed every moment of it.
Sunflower
OMaharishiSunYogini 1 year ago
great stuff.
leezus83 1 year ago
The ad on the right is a bit over the top - "super-pleasurable" states of deep meditation? I think they mean, "smoke weed and hang loose" meditation
onephurba 1 year ago
Isn't this voodoo science, or am I confusing two different things here? I think Robert Park would call this voodoo science. I want this to be true, but how can I believe it if it's just a story telling without any proof. It looks like they wanna cheer us up with false beleifs.
larbo1616 1 year ago
@larbo1616 Lull us into a stupor and get us to buy their books about false beliefs, rather.
ANewHuman 1 year ago
Readers of The Field, I would like to ask you something, you probably understood this better than me. In The Field there is a chapter about Karl Lashly and Karl Pibram who discovered that there are no specific function areas in the brain. How was it then possible that Phineas Gage, who got a metal tube trough his brain, completely had another personality afterwards?
larbo1616 1 year ago
@larbo1616 Because when in pain and unconsious and people say things then that can have a big effect on the peson - rather like hypnotism. Also, sometimes the being just leaves the body and another one comes along.
colwilpro 1 year ago
@colwilpro I don't accept that as an argument. People are easily tricked by their brains. NDE-s have big effects on people, too. Still, this is no proof that their experience is real. Drugs like DMT could cause experiences like that.
larbo1616 1 year ago
Great Post....thanks for sharing...
Greenhornet270 1 year ago
What ? I don't know whether to laugh or cry ! Complete bullshit - no understanding of science. Spouting pseudo-science in order to manipulate and exploit the vulnerable. This is nothing more than a sales pitch for a cult. Guess what - she has books and videos to sell as well. Oh and a disgusting manipulative website (wddty) full of conspiracy theories and lies about health all with the "intention" of making money out of vulnerable people. She is a disgusting evil woman.
anivegmin 1 year ago
@anivegmin Really? I'm not trying to start an argument btw, but what exactly do you think is is being dishonest about or she is misinformed about? Are you a physicist or something? I'm curious because having studied this kind of thing for years, I am skeptical, but remain open minded. Can you know, really be certain, that she is not correct?
Redsparrowe123 1 year ago
Can't believe she doesn't know anything about fung shway...
SGde3a 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Absolutely full of shit! lol! I can tell just by looking at these people that they are full of shit! The only 'intention' here is to make money out of tragically gullible (usually american) people with zero understanding of science. Both this woman and that mawkish freak clearly have not a single clue what on earth they are talking about! They sound like comedians doing a spoof of themselves! Lol!
youjustdontknow76 2 years ago
Great video, thanks for posting it!!
JanieA100 2 years ago 2
Alan needs to find a better hairstylist.
DanielMcDirty 2 years ago 2
Its Nutty! but its amazing when its starts to make a bit of sense. Read " THE FIELD" its a great parallel of science and spirit. I've always been on both side of the fence but her book has offered a space for both to exist. With Great proof in actual studies, just read it.
tonymashtonymash 2 years ago 2
But when somebody discovers a new comet. That has not brought the comet in to existance. It's existed for millions, perhaps billions of years. It's just never passed close to the Earth before? I don't get the observing/bringing into being thing! No one has ever observed my heart before. But I sure hope that it exists!
CelticReject 2 years ago 2
She had my interest until she brought up the Near Death stuff. That's when it went from Science to Ghost stories. Then again, I should have expected it when a journalist, instead of a physicist is explaining physics.
chowpappy 2 years ago
There is so massive amount of evidence about NDEs and OBEs that even the most hard boiled sceptics can't ignored that, if they want to use a bit common sense. The phenomenon is there, it's different subject to argue how they can be interpreted.
geromino2007 2 years ago 2
No, actually there's not. Not as a real physical phenomenon where a soul can actually leave his/her body. Just consider it. If someone could OBE they would be the richest, most powerful person in the World. Eavesdrop on the Corporate boardroom for stock tips. Check out what Vladamir Putin is doing and sell the info. It could be so easily proven. Just ghost out and tell everyone what color panties Angelina Jolie is wearing. Sure, the mental states have a reality--but no more real than dreams.
chowpappy 2 years ago
I meant that the phenomenon exist. Whether is has something to do with our physically perceived universe is something to talk about. If you study a bit what people who have OBEs frequently are telling us, you understand that the problem is not that straight forward.
geromino2007 2 years ago
Of course they report on astral dimensions that we have no means to confirm by instruments yet. BUt interesting anectode is that some have made a map for themselves about these worlds. If these would be just random mental noise, the idea of map would be useless?
geromino2007 2 years ago
Comment removed
geromino2007 2 years ago
There is also another dimension that they report. That level has something to do with our physical reality, but it's not totally consisntent with it. They descripe it as a mental projection of physical world. And skillful people are indeed capable to get some information about distant objects.
geromino2007 2 years ago
@geromino2007 Elaborate?
ANewHuman 1 year ago
@geromino2007 Which evidence?
ANewHuman 1 year ago
@ANewHuman As a layman who interested these subjects i can only point you to literature about the subjects. If you are not yet done so, please watch Dean Radin's google talk. he talks about taboo in science regarding to PSI studies, and he presents those studies as well. In the end is very good Q&A with skeptical audience.
geromino2007 1 year ago
I love these intereview with MrSteinfeld
Hes reminds me of the first Dr Who
Thanks for posting
subbtopp 2 years ago
From 6:22 - 17:10 I find difficult to comprehend. How was that possible to have the even take place 10 years before the praying? I just can't get my head around it so if someone could clear that up for me that would be great. Oh and my outrageous question is: Will it really take all 6-7 Billion of us to be collectively thinking positively on say global warming for it to be remedied? Is their a specific number of beings and their consciousnesses to be praying and if so what is it?
NZartfuldando 2 years ago
1% of the square root of any given population. This number has been quantified in literally hundreds of experiments over the last 40 or s0 years.
paganknight 2 years ago
It's difficult to comprehend because it defies everyday human reality -- which are brains evolved to make "common" sense of. The key for your understanding is to consider HUMAN reality is not the OBJECTIVE reality of the Universe; how things truly are...
Because how things truly are, based on the evidence (i.e. influencing Random Event Generators backwards in time), is that "time" is probably created by your consciousness; that the past, present, future, are illusory.
RodCornholio 2 years ago
(continued)
So, my only advice is to shift your perspective in order to fit the data. There are also more theoretical papers on retrocausality to be found on the internet. Just as one can't put a square peg through a round hole, you won't be able to comprehend how this can be possible if you stick to an ordinary view of reality.
As to coherent groups of intending people, I would be cautious since there could be unintended consequences (i.e. a deep freeze, worst case scenario).
RodCornholio 2 years ago
Don't let Steinfeld's demeanor fool anyone. He is a very bright guy.
RodCornholio 2 years ago 2
I'm not so sure about that. He needs to"agree" a lot less and just let his guest make their point. I am interested in his guests but find it very hard to set through an entire interview. It's almost as if he uses his guests as a way of getting personal therapy. Notice how know matter what the subject is how he will set there and nod his head and speak under his breath then when he asks a question it will deal with a personal issue of his. Besides being an uncontrollable flame the guy is a flake.
paganknight 2 years ago
Intelligent, attractive woman.
capricious71 2 years ago
Read her books they cant be put down...GREAT reads!!
cajunhornet60 2 years ago
this man is brilliant: great posts!
cajunhornet60 2 years ago
intent in consciousness is its own discourse. stoping trains or improving math grades are subjective goals, thought is the world we know but doesnt carry direct weight when wishing for an improved world while declining to have collectives at your table for coffee. recognizing that it is each one of us contributing to intent that makes life horrors must become our true question: can we surrender our intent that harms on all levels? if so then good intent wont be the elusive commodity
mitchelldo4 2 years ago
Here is a true Zen moment.
A Cohiba cigar, a nice back porch and a glass of Coppola Claret.
What is so complicated about this stuff? The road to happiness is not allowing people to dump their baggage on you for making stupid mistakes in their lives.
It isn't complicated people! NOW DROP DOWN AND GIVE ME 20.
Now send me $29.95 and I can prophosize one thing...you will be out $29.95.
The Pharoah's of Egypt had it right; dump on them and you die.
BoomerNavy70 2 years ago 2
cool XD
redindygo 3 years ago 3
it is plausible that someone who 'nearly' dies is not actually dead therefore, they are still alive, so following from that does it sound unreasonable that someone could still hear things going on! also the observer?? in order to observe a particle in a test experiment, you have to interact with it in some way we are observing it yes, but we observe it by shining light on it, etc therefore the 'wave function' collapses because something interacts with the particle.
SeaSea1982 3 years ago 2
As for the observer - yes, you have re-stated the observer effect accurately. It was derived from Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle which stated that you cannot know an electrons position and velocity at any given point in space/time, only one or the other, due to the fact that making the observation to see where it is or how fast it is moving changes it's position or velocity by bouncing a photon (light particle) off it.
gdavis95129 2 years ago
Thank you Lynne and New Realities. Not to beat the 2012 thing to death but, the sun's 11 year cycle will peak on the proposed date and according to what she says about the sun's magnetic fields, that may mean something like us actually living our intention during a huge magnetic sun storm...
Peace Love and Gratitude
SpiritusBythos 3 years ago
Consciousness hmmm - I wonder if thats why God calls himself
THE I AM THAT I AM
FATGIRLSRHOT 3 years ago
Wrongo, that´s Popeye!
donadthegonad 3 years ago
Ha gagagagaga
FATGIRLSRHOT 3 years ago
No you dont have to die to find love but you have to die to find the truth.if we were GODS we wouldnt need to die every one would be in control.But thats not the case life although seems meaningless death is enevitable.You will die. if given a choice you would choose to live forever but you cant!doesnt that tell you something? Isac newton,albert einstein and may tried so hard to find what lynn is trying and failed.still you dont understand
cryonyits07done 3 years ago
WE ARE NOT GOD.WE ARE PEOPLE GOD IS GOD
cryonyits07done 3 years ago
What does God mean to you? Some guy with a long white beard living in the sky? Just curious.
newrealities 3 years ago
God to me is love.thats how i describe him.the fact that science is still searching for whatever they are searching for must tell you something.science will search forever.... but mark my words when you die you will find the truth.
cryonyits07done 3 years ago
You don't have to die to find love. so when you "say thats how i describe him". You are buying into a conditioned mythology. Actually the whole word God should be thrown out, I think there is just feeling and consciousness. Lynne is trying to define that. Science has made the world easier to live in. it just needs to continuously redefine itself and not settle on what it thinks it knows. People need to do the same. So think for yourself.
newrealities 3 years ago 10
Too me its so simple they used the wrong path and obviously went about it the very (long) way.you as a person know how to eat ,you know how to speak you know exactly whats in your wardrobe and it didnt take you a life time to figure it out.why are scientist still searching! how come we are consciousness but still looking for that which we cant find? The answer is simple WE ARE NOT IN CONTROLE OF EVERYTHING.Thats the truth for we cant be GODS and play tricks on ourselfs now can we?
cryonyits07done 3 years ago
The subconcious under the direction of God unknowingly leads you in the direction he has planned for you. That is if you give your life to God.
Yeshua Jesus Said:
IF YOU LOOSE YOURSELF FOR MY MYSAKE, YOU WILL BE FREE AND YOUR LIFE WILL FOUND.
IF YOU FOUND YOUR LIFE, YOU WILL LOOSE IT.
Which direction will you go?
With your life or the One God has planned for you?
FATGIRLSRHOT 3 years ago
We can't find it because it's inside of us. Not "out there".
JanieA100 2 years ago
Can you live in your home and not know whats inside because its inside and not outside? That makes no sense.
cryonyits07done 2 years ago
Sure you can if you're blind or deaf to what's going on inside your home. Our minds are possessed by our thoughts and our egos and it's only when we calm the mind through meditation and living in the present moment that we can really feel who we truely are.
JanieA100 2 years ago
@newrealities
excellent words from you with your comment
great to read
thanks!
all for one and one for all
peaceandparty 1 year ago
@newrealities
You say--- "Science has made the world easier to live in."
You, yes you, are buying into a conditioned mythology. So think for yourself.
The Same problems of ((WAR, GREED, WEALTH GAP, WASTEFUL DESTRUCTION OF NATURE)) are growing larger in magnitude as Scientists take the same "all knowing" approach that religious powers abused long ago.
ythb123 1 year ago
Yep, but we are all brothers and sisters. And Everything is integrated. All things that are alive are inter connected, and there is no seperation. God is still God. Adam and Eve before the fall is my intent on what I'm getting at and Jesus is our way through to the Kingdom connection of energies. All is One under the One that is the Son. God is still God.
FATGIRLSRHOT 3 years ago
@cryonyits07done
gODD doesnt need screaming down here on earth!
though i tend to believe GOD is on earth too!
among us!
we must respect eachother unconditionally when we all have the same attitude,well!we will see then!
different lifestyles...same attitude...love thy neighbour
peaceandparty 1 year ago
@cryonyits07done God is everything, all things. All reality was created from the very being of god. So in this respect, we are all god.
Jammsbro1 1 year ago
@Jammsbro1 We have the spirit of God within us yes,but we are not Gods,we are his children just as you have your father`s genes, although you are one in a sense you are not him for you both have different finger prints.You have some of him yes but you are not him.We are God`s children we are not God in every respect.
cryonyits07done 1 year ago
These kind of intention experiments are nothing new.Dean Radin is a pioneer in the field and has already achieved significant positive results.These experiments are ongoing :"The global conciousness experiment" for example.
Nevertheless i think its great that you are pushing this topic as it is more important for us than many people are willing to accept or believe.:-)
soulmate702000 3 years ago
interesting stuff. we would be interested to hear what you think of our own brand of intention experiments. one way or another all our clips are such experiments.
UrbanHunters 3 years ago
Alan,
I have evidence that you're an OTO Mason.
Can you confirm this?
truthsleuth2 3 years ago
Silence eh, Alan?
truthsleuth2 3 years ago
Not only will not confirm my findings that you're an OTO Mason, but you had Paula Gloria erase my similar question at her YTube channel.
truthsleuth2 3 years ago
at 2:28 the video skipped for me. i think i got the alternate ending. it had a better outcome.
observationmode 3 years ago
God is the observer of everything therefore everything DOES exist.
dimphil 3 years ago 2
i dont buy it, this "secret" b.s.
danimation777 3 years ago
because you are woefully contemporary and subscribe to it a name that has been used for what 5 years? do some research instead instead embarassing yourself.
SFwizardoakland 3 years ago
o.k. im secretly willing and visualizing your woefully asinine gullible ass throwing your money away on some charlatan guru. is it working? is it working? as for the name what do you mean? my youtube name? who gives a shit its a youtube name. ive got better outlets for my creativity than my youtube name. you no doubt visualize yourself as an un-contemporary man of the future, superior to me and most people. what does it feel like to condescend "in the now".
danimation777 3 years ago
you cant judge what you cant see
jea740 3 years ago
I never spent money on the book moron. read my post. I described it as woefully contemporary. What IT DESCRIBES though, albiet in a confused and oversimplified manner, did work to answer your question you snarky little ignorant yes man.
SFwizardoakland 3 years ago
can't tell you what you aren't open to hear.
markisses4u 3 years ago
im much more open than you think. ive been reading about this stuff for a very long time but as yet remain unconvinced. its just wishful thinking to me. id like it to be true. you can intend all you want to but i think your environment and phsiology play a much more significant role.
danimation777 3 years ago
"but as yet remain unconvinced" implies that you were unconvinced while trying to learn it, which means you had already made up your mind without even giving it a fair trial, which means you got the results you expected.
mermadeinheaven 3 years ago
tell it to him mermaid....
SFwizardoakland 3 years ago
simply not true. saying i remain unconviced means i wasn't to begin with and still am not it dosent' mean i intended the whole time to be unconvinced why would i bother paying any attention at all if i was not interested in other possible points of view. as for "yes man" what/who am i the yes man for. i get it. everyone who doesn't live in a land of make-believe like SFwizonmyface is a yes man
danimation777 3 years ago
intention is lyk 100% will noting can stop you but what see means is that tinks cheage when your in the right mod so whats your probleem meaby see is right
jea740 3 years ago
shes discribeing what people have known for a very long time have any of you ever seen the secret ? what thats what that is and the way u intend it to youself is very much the same
andypmz07 3 years ago
wow! thats a great Idea to concentrate the Intention of many people to single things like a Laser! =)
niewiedermehr 3 years ago
Brilliant! I sent it to my 10,000+ contacts - Wan
yogameditation 3 years ago 6
#46 - Top Favorites (Today) - Nonprofits & Activism
paulagloria 3 years ago
Wow. I needed to hear the part about the Solar Effect on Intention. Thanks!
SolarMagick 3 years ago
modern science is observing & explaining what mystics have known since ancient times...will we be the civilization that fully comprehends this condition of existence & accepts the responsibility for our intentions & actions, applying our energy with reverence?...
1nessism 3 years ago
great interview alan, my favorite so far.
i liked, no loved how you questioned, analyzed and presented what she was theorizing... profound, sharp, fluid. "Let's ask the future!"
markisses4u 3 years ago
Lynn talks about retroactively affecting people in a grocery store to walk more often in a certain direction. I find the most fun situation to do these kinds of experiments is on a dance floor, preferably one filled with people who dance as a means of self expression, such as at a 'rave'. Everyone there is already moving in response to their subconscious so it's much easier to influence people's motions and the results can be much more amusing than a simple change in walking direction. Try it!:)
AndrewLife 3 years ago