Lol for the whole time I was operating on the basis that the 2 square numbers had to be the same, until I read the question again. Now I feel stupid (still knew it was 25 after like 4 minutes though).
@EPVxRaize Which of those square numbers are the sum of two squares. You can add two square numbers together to equal it. 16 (square of 4) and 9 (square of 3) add up to 25.
Not as bad as the lady who used thought that there were 9 hours and 3 minutes between 7:14am and 5:11 PM. And he's not that bad because the audience got it wrong+AOL. Pretty bad.
To be fair, it can almost get a _tiny_ bit tricky if you're trying to figure it out by doing the numbers in your head to see if any squares add up to one of those larger numbers. But that is why you start off on the easy side. 3+9=12, 3+16=19, 9+16=25... oh crap, you got it with three 1st grade level calculations. Too bad America fails at critical thinking skills.
This is how to work ur way around this question. Squares of 16 = 4, 25 = 5, 36 = 6, 49 = 7
"The question states sum of two smaller square numbers" so for 16, we have 3x3 plus 2x2 = 13. Wrong. For 36, we have 5x5 plus 4x4 = 41. Wrong. For 49, we have 6x6 plus 5x5 = 61. Wrong. For 25, we have 4x4 plus 3x3 = 25. B is ur answer ;)
@DisneyYH "the sum of 2 smaller square numbers": you could try also to take the same square numbers for example 49 = 5x5 + 5x5 (they dont have to be different, only smaller). but well it was really easy if u know what square numbers are :P
The audience is dumb, it's truly simple math. The answer can't be 16, because it is the sum of a pair of different numbers. The only numbers you could use would be 9, 4 or 1. Yes, 2^2 = 4, but then you'd need a different pair in order to complete the question.
@KeroKero204 B: 25 A square number is any number times itself. 1x1 = 1 2x2 = 4 3x3 = 9 4x4 = 16 5x5 = 25 6x6 = 36 7x7 = 49 So now we know that the number doesn't include 5, 6, or 7 which cancels out answers C and D. So let's go lowest to highest. None of the numbers we have below 4 (1, 2, 3) will add up to 16 so cancel out A. Now let's make sure. 9+16=25. Easy way to get that is to add 10 to 16 then -1. So answer is B. Not hard, should be able to figure that one out in 30s, tops
took me like 10 - 15 seconds to figure out the answer.. the audience poll clearly shows the poor state of mathematics education in america.. bloody hell..
Admittedly, I paused the video because I thought he might answer too quickly. I estimate that it took be about 10 seconds to figure this out. The audience poll came up and I was just depressed.
The problem was in the question, it was vaguely written. Combine that with the social pressure of millions of people watching you, and it's easy to see why he missed it. The answer really isn't that hard to come up with. As if the vacuous Viera could have solved it without that answer handed to her. The woman was a host on a fluffy morning TV show that idiots watch, not a mathematician.
@MrMerlin87 NO, not "fair enough." Both the audience and AOL response FAILED miserably. We are a nation of sadly undereducated people. That should be known, at least by a plurality.
OMG not even the majority of the audience could get the right answer? What's wrong with the world, you don't need to be a mathematical genius to know the answers B: 25 (16 + 9), both are square numbers,k which sum to 25.
@rub1k Yes, American-born Asians are suddenly born with advanced Asian minds. They're not smart because of the strict education system in Asia or anything.
Ok so WHERE exactly did 3 squared come from? The "sum" of the 2 SMALLER squared numbers would be 4 (16 squared) + 5 (25 squared), which would = 9... Where the HELL does 3 SQUARED COME FROM IN HERE!!? lol
@CeeWorld69 wtf are you retarded?? two square numbers added together to equal a larger square number. 3 squared + 4 squared = 5 squared. 4 and 5 arent square numbers you retard...
I can actually understand the guy being nervous and not being able to do math in front of people, but the fact that the correct answer was third most chosen makes me feel bad for the audience... because dumb people make me sad.
thats tricky because 4^2 is = to (not less than) one of the other choices, i mean how else can the sum of two undoubtedly positive numbers be less than the one its factors?
I understand that he's wrong, and maybe it was due to being under pressure or what but DON'T justify it. There is no way to do so. There's nothing ambiguous about the question, there is only one answer. the audience got it wrong. Simple.
@ibeatuplittlekids I am, aren't I? However, if the question was about how you spell "you are" abbreviated, I'm afraid you wouldn't get the money that easily. But hey, I don't even live in an anglo-saxonic country, so, what do I know? Right?
tht is the most confusing questions and trust me im not stupid in math its so easy to overthink this...4^2=16 and 2^2=4 and 2^2+2^2=16.......if i got tht fucking question wrong i woulda been furious at those motherfuckers cuz of how they worded it
@WannabeTesla maybe... I think my brain is so fundamentally different from most people after 4 years of engineering college that I couldn't comprehend not knowing math xD
Actually I retract my last comment, I understand the confusion now.
Sorry I questioned your intelligence Americans, it's not the first time I've seen a really stupidly worded or even wrong question on the American WWTBAM.
"Which also happens to be the sum of two smaller square numbers".
4 is smaller, it's a square number. Take two of them, multiply them together and it's 16.
The question is ambiguous and should've considered saying "two different smaller square numbers.".
@FluffyFooFookins The question says the SUM of TWO smaller square numbers. When you MULTIPLY 4 by 4, by definition it is the SUM of 4 + 4 + 4 + 4 which a SUM of FOUR smaller square numbers. When you MULTIPLY, the answer is called the PRODUCT. The question is perfectly ambiguous if you actually know what mathematical terms mean. The guy and the american audience fell into a classic primary school math test trap.
I understand that, I'm just saying I understand how the confusion happened.
The problem with the audience is that they don't get the terminology, not that they can't add up.
Just suggesting a way that it could help.
I came up with my second post after asking someone else and getting a realization from the way their mind was working. They've got multiply on the brain, it's a good trap to be fair as it can play on how the mind works.
@FluffyFooFookins Well, such is the nature of asking people question for money. You want to make it challenging or what is the fun in watching. Still, it's a very basic mistake, and using the "question was not ambiguous enough" statement is just a poor excuse. My point was, it was ambiguous enough, the guy just doesn't know what he needed to know to answer the question. Neither did the audience; that disappoints me more.
LOL Seriously America? Large majority of the Audience thought it was A? Wow that's embarrassing. I'm not understanding how everything thinks it's A. The question says "WHICH IS THE SUM OF TWO SMALLER SQUARE NUMBERS" not "WHICH IS THE SMALLER SQUARE NUMBER" 4x4 = 16 3x3 = 9 16 + 9 = 25 5x5 = 25 This is like what you do in school when you're 10-11 years old.
@FluffyFooFookins it's a pretty easy mistake to make, i had to think about it for a while. it may be that people think that the question means which of the square numbers is created by a smaller sqaure number... as in 2X2=4 and 4X4=16. retarded, sure, but understandable
If you undesrtand sums and squares you don't even to know Pythagoras dammit, they just automatically turn their brains off when math appears, trying to calculate won't cost ya penny.
The studio audience is usually smarter than the AOL audience. The only answers rated higher by the studio were A and B and B had a bigger drop to the AOL audience. Therefore B is the right answer. Or you could just do the math yourself.
Never trust the public on a math question.
spase667 56 minutes ago
I've taken the same math class 3 times..and I still dont know how to do that crap..lol
sstryker93 3 hours ago
1:13 audience fail....
zhbarton 4 hours ago
He doesn't know Pythagoras triangle?? 3²+4²=5²
porcupine0503 6 hours ago
Simple:
a) 4²=16 smaller square numbers would be 3²=9+2²=4 9+4=13 false
b) 5²=25 smaller square numbers would be 4²=16+3²=9 16+9=25 right
You're welcome! I sucked in maths btw xD
gtazogger 7 hours ago
25 always wins
fatkidincoat 8 hours ago
Fucking audience
jamestatm 9 hours ago
Lol for the whole time I was operating on the basis that the 2 square numbers had to be the same, until I read the question again. Now I feel stupid (still knew it was 25 after like 4 minutes though).
jacob3800 11 hours ago
Comment removed
mrmafian 11 hours ago
I got 25, but when I thought about it more, I just got confused. But I would have picked 25.
MusicMel97 17 hours ago
wow he, the audience, and the viewers are all retarded.
jrich3126 17 hours ago
Ya I didn't even understand that question too..
HammerdinPally 18 hours ago
i didnt even understand the question
EPVxRaize 20 hours ago
@EPVxRaize Which of those square numbers are the sum of two squares. You can add two square numbers together to equal it. 16 (square of 4) and 9 (square of 3) add up to 25.
Crispy27 16 hours ago
Not as bad as the lady who used thought that there were 9 hours and 3 minutes between 7:14am and 5:11 PM. And he's not that bad because the audience got it wrong+AOL. Pretty bad.
jakolu 20 hours ago
very silly!
TheProfsb 1 day ago
oh. iback myself up by saying im a 13 year old that didnt learn that yet.
jzburda 1 day ago
D. 49
jzburda 1 day ago
To be fair, it can almost get a _tiny_ bit tricky if you're trying to figure it out by doing the numbers in your head to see if any squares add up to one of those larger numbers. But that is why you start off on the easy side. 3+9=12, 3+16=19, 9+16=25... oh crap, you got it with three 1st grade level calculations. Too bad America fails at critical thinking skills.
Tomtomchacha 1 day ago 2
@Tomtomchacha Not everyone in America fails at critical thinking. o.O
IndieRPGAdventure 22 hours ago
@Tomtomchacha They don't even try to teach this "critical thinking" you speak of in school!
CrimsonMystery 17 hours ago
Audience be trollin!
PokemonRulez2468 1 day ago
Lol, so 45% of all Americans that use AOL believe 16 was the answer!? LMAO!!!
Shino4Life 1 day ago
that is just sad
hahaha186 1 day ago
who forgot to turn the volume !!
MrGetmilk 1 day ago
This is how to work ur way around this question. Squares of 16 = 4, 25 = 5, 36 = 6, 49 = 7
"The question states sum of two smaller square numbers" so for 16, we have 3x3 plus 2x2 = 13. Wrong. For 36, we have 5x5 plus 4x4 = 41. Wrong. For 49, we have 6x6 plus 5x5 = 61. Wrong. For 25, we have 4x4 plus 3x3 = 25. B is ur answer ;)
DisneyYH 1 day ago
@DisneyYH "the sum of 2 smaller square numbers": you could try also to take the same square numbers for example 49 = 5x5 + 5x5 (they dont have to be different, only smaller). but well it was really easy if u know what square numbers are :P
dbgfeller 1 day ago
The audience is dumb, it's truly simple math. The answer can't be 16, because it is the sum of a pair of different numbers. The only numbers you could use would be 9, 4 or 1. Yes, 2^2 = 4, but then you'd need a different pair in order to complete the question.
Silly Internet People, go back to school.
punkducky69 1 day ago
@punkducky69 Your'e proving that u r intelligent???
wahiditsme 1 day ago
@wahiditsme You're* you* are* and please, don't use 3 question marks. Only one.
PokemonRulez2468 1 day ago
I guess the question refers to natural numbers considering that, for instance: 2*sqrt(2)+2*sqrt(2)=16.
ImminentAndrea 1 day ago
@ImminentAndrea Now that's another man that knows math. You guys that say 25+9 = 34 better ask this guy because he obviously knows math !
krityx 1 day ago
To all the people who think that 32 is another answer, since when is 32 a square number??
gofish8195 1 day ago
wtf, like who would seriously even know the answer to that.
KeroKero204 1 day ago
@KeroKero204
Its a simple question man .. :') Basic stuff a child of 7 knows
Michielos23 1 day ago
FraggingBard 1 day ago
took me like 10 - 15 seconds to figure out the answer.. the audience poll clearly shows the poor state of mathematics education in america.. bloody hell..
potterbond007 1 day ago 2
Admittedly, I paused the video because I thought he might answer too quickly. I estimate that it took be about 10 seconds to figure this out. The audience poll came up and I was just depressed.
DementisXYZ 1 day ago
89 people don't know math....
jahart111 1 day ago 2
Took me like 10 seconds to get 25 currently at 1:24 through ftw
Lakitu13372 1 day ago
America is going to crap...
yellowhammer07 1 day ago
@yellowhammer07 You didn't know the answer either you fool.
luckyyouwtflol 1 day ago
after seeing the poll results i really wish i had AOL
PewPewPewDead 1 day ago
2:17 for his face <3
xMacieX 1 day ago
Comment removed
xMacieX 1 day ago
The thing is.....loads of audience members got it wrong too.,,,,including people on the web, with a calculator tool just sitting on their desktop...
grunnyyk2 1 day ago
it was obvious to pick 25 pythagoras theorem :P 3(squared) + 4(squared) = 5(squared) easiest example 9+16=25
2112kon 1 day ago
@2112kon Got nothing to do with pythagoras' theorem but there we go....
gofish8195 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The problem was in the question, it was vaguely written. Combine that with the social pressure of millions of people watching you, and it's easy to see why he missed it. The answer really isn't that hard to come up with. As if the vacuous Viera could have solved it without that answer handed to her. The woman was a host on a fluffy morning TV show that idiots watch, not a mathematician.
AlexanderRozhenko 2 days ago
Comment removed
AlexanderRozhenko 2 days ago
36= 25+9 also .... idiots.
krityx 2 days ago
@krityx ... 25+9=34... not 36, idiot.
konanthedog 2 days ago
@konanthedog you obviously don't know your math. 25+9=34 lol.
krityx 2 days ago
@krityx thats what he said..?
razorTin 1 day ago
@krityx I'm sorry, would you like a calculator?
atkinsonn45 2 days ago
@krityx hahaha i love when someone fails so horrifically. thank you made my day
DfromtheSCC 1 day ago
@krityx hahahah u f*** retard xD
reaktionskanone 1 day ago
@krityx what a retard you are
gofish8195 1 day ago
Only 30% of Americans have been to high school
Tewari25 2 days ago
i knew it too
thegamerfrominside 2 days ago
Comment removed
pm2595 2 days ago
hes so dull caus hes not lernt math in china!
easteree 2 days ago
Comment removed
pm2595 2 days ago
@pedropapt haha, bad math on a bad math video. 16000 - 15000 = $1000, which he won.
danielmccarrick 2 days ago
@andiroo you wouldnt count "0" as a number in a math question like this.
danielmccarrick 2 days ago
Comment removed
andiroo 2 days ago
@andiroo By george you're right!
vampiresvengance 2 days ago
It's 16,000 dolars not 15,000
Pedropapt 2 days ago
Both the audience and AOL (heh) failed to understand, on average by large margins, that
5^2 = 25 = 16 + 9 = 4^2 + 3^2.
It's straightforward, you just select each of he choices and run through all combinations.
Yes, America, we are a nation of undereducated people.
epsdelta 2 days ago
It's a trap
LSDrumline08 2 days ago
Fail audience again
WingedSoulies 2 days ago
Did anyone else want to snap their keyboard in half watching this?!
:I
Hytegia 2 days ago
if you know the definition of a square number then getting it wrong is retarded : /
if you dont know then fair enough
MrMerlin87 2 days ago
@MrMerlin87 NO, not "fair enough." Both the audience and AOL response FAILED miserably. We are a nation of sadly undereducated people. That should be known, at least by a plurality.
epsdelta 2 days ago
I wonder if they would have let him use scratch paper.
InfiniteUniverse88 2 days ago
i bet the person who picked d was just trolling him
XBALLERX007 2 days ago
OMG not even the majority of the audience could get the right answer? What's wrong with the world, you don't need to be a mathematical genius to know the answers B: 25 (16 + 9), both are square numbers,k which sum to 25.
Chaos3131 3 days ago
audience: trollface.jpg
ramasart10 3 days ago
@ramasart10 more like americans.jpg
rub1k 3 days ago
@rub1k
Average IQ of America - 98
Average IQ of Portugal - 95
NutritiouslyHigh 2 days ago 2
@NutritiouslyHigh Imagine if there were no Asians in US...
rub1k 2 days ago
@rub1k Yes, American-born Asians are suddenly born with advanced Asian minds. They're not smart because of the strict education system in Asia or anything.
NutritiouslyHigh 2 days ago
32 could be the answer it didnt state the 2 smaller squared numbers cant be the same so four squared + 4 squared (16+16) = 32
memattmayor 3 days ago
@memattmayor 32 isnt a square number...
gofish8195 1 day ago
answer is all...
mengguful 3 days ago
Wow.. That actually took me way to long. I felt stupid when I got it.
Groopzy 3 days ago
they had to specify that the numbers belong to natural (N) set of numer: for ex. 49= (5^2)+(4,8989....^2).
eugenioLU91 3 days ago
to be honest that question may be misunderstood at first. just need to give it some thought
xxahmadkaddouxx 3 days ago
Ok so WHERE exactly did 3 squared come from? The "sum" of the 2 SMALLER squared numbers would be 4 (16 squared) + 5 (25 squared), which would = 9... Where the HELL does 3 SQUARED COME FROM IN HERE!!? lol
CeeWorld69 3 days ago 2
@CeeWorld69 Look up the Pythagorean theorem.
GamerGod9590 3 days ago
@CeeWorld69 the question is asking for ANY two squared numbers and only 25 works with squared which is 9 and 4 squared which is 16. 16+9=25
xxahmadkaddouxx 3 days ago
@CeeWorld69 wtf are you retarded?? two square numbers added together to equal a larger square number. 3 squared + 4 squared = 5 squared. 4 and 5 arent square numbers you retard...
gofish8195 1 day ago
AOL?what it means?is anyone know?
INFORMUNIVERSEGIC 3 days ago
Wow.
I can actually understand the guy being nervous and not being able to do math in front of people, but the fact that the correct answer was third most chosen makes me feel bad for the audience... because dumb people make me sad.
FuckItSnoopy 3 days ago
Why would you ask a studio audience a math question that deals with something beyond addition and/or subtraction?
Magzillas 3 days ago
Wake Forest University and you couldn't do that simple math problem? What a shame. That is one of the most prestigious schools in NC.
salcal522 3 days ago
LOL he's so pissed
Laidx 3 days ago
Lol I'm good at math, but not reading, because I missed the "Sum" part so I was thinking it was 2x2=4 which you take the four and go 4x4=16
crazyaces222 3 days ago
thats tricky because 4^2 is = to (not less than) one of the other choices, i mean how else can the sum of two undoubtedly positive numbers be less than the one its factors?
MrPentatonicScale 3 days ago
what a fucking dumb question, made no sense.
jaz983 4 days ago
@jaz983
Of course it made sense, you dumbfuck..
Zwodo 3 days ago
@Zwodo LMFAO. Yeah, so agreed.
danielvutran 1 day ago
@jaz983 what a mong you are
gofish8195 1 day ago
(3,4,5) is actually a very famous Pythagorean triple. The answer is 25, I cannot believe more percent of the audience voted for 16.
SuperStudying 4 days ago 2
trolled by the audience
BlackOfTheNight 4 days ago
I understand that he's wrong, and maybe it was due to being under pressure or what but DON'T justify it. There is no way to do so. There's nothing ambiguous about the question, there is only one answer. the audience got it wrong. Simple.
Yetaxa 4 days ago
You'd just turn round an be like "YOU ALL SUCK DICK!"
MBTV23 4 days ago
I just did 4 x 4 plus 3 x 3 and it got 25 :D
BennyJayRuss 4 days ago
@BennyJayRuss (4x4)+(4x4) = 32 so that is also an answer
memattmayor 3 days ago
@memattmayor Dumbass, it says the sum of TWO smaller square numbers, you have used FOUR square numbers.
Chaos3131 3 days ago
@Chaos3131 4 isnt a square number you retard, hes saying 4 squared is the number, but its wrong anyway
gofish8195 1 day ago
@gofish8195 4 isn't a square number? What do you suppose 2x2 is then? Call me a retard... Fuck You!
Chaos3131 1 day ago
@Chaos3131 omg, yes 4 is a square number but not THE square number he was on about you retard
gofish8195 1 day ago
@gofish8195 you just made me lol.
rcui2u3 1 day ago
@rcui2u3 i make me lol
gofish8195 1 day ago
@memattmayor no, 32 isnt a square number
gofish8195 1 day ago
how the hell did i get here from Im juggernaut bitch!
kisaza334 4 days ago
this is easy
zhangman92792 4 days ago
Comment removed
WannabeTesla 4 days ago
This isn't poorly worded as long as you know what a square number is.
grichl88 4 days ago
poorly worded=/ i thought choice A or choice D=/
xixsilerxix 4 days ago
@xixsilerxix Why is it poorly worded?
TheDrunkenmeerkat 4 days ago
I dont even know what the sum is. Doesshe mean Sum of all fears the movie? Cause that was a movie . . . not a number
azfryguy 5 days ago
3²+4²=5² Pythagoräisches Zahlentrippel, dummes Publikum
TheTorrap 5 days ago
'When not knowing Math can cost you $15,000'. I'm pretty sure he was playing for 16,000. Maybe he cant do maths but you can't hear!
BoxedUpBeats 5 days ago
@BoxedUpBeats no he is right, because he gets 1.000
OniLink24 5 days ago
@BoxedUpBeats Right, he was playing for a potential $16,000 but came away with $1000. So his answer cost him $15,000. Come on bro
madhjsp 5 days ago
@BoxedUpBeats retard
patrickphor 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BoxedUpBeats he dropped down to 1000 after getting it wrong. 16000 to 1000 cost him 15000
TaaastyBurger 1 day ago
@ibeatuplittlekids I am, aren't I? However, if the question was about how you spell "you are" abbreviated, I'm afraid you wouldn't get the money that easily. But hey, I don't even live in an anglo-saxonic country, so, what do I know? Right?
xarepe1 5 days ago
Retarded question.
Voidkvlt 5 days ago
@Voidkvlt What is retarded about it?
TheDrunkenmeerkat 4 days ago
wow
19navyseal91 5 days ago
SOB I just made the same mistake 70% of people just made
TheSmittel 5 days ago
wow.. Do people just crack under pressure or is that just a convenient excuse. 30% of audience said B. So 30% think 5 is a square number. lol
TheSmittel 5 days ago
2x2 2x2 = 4x4 4x4
ChingXyooj 5 days ago
holy shit that misread that one XD
troyhoward15 5 days ago
Comment removed
orobxx 5 days ago
"I'm going to go with the audience and say A" I got shocked.
MrKingsSmart 5 days ago
Oh wow.
JonnLennz 5 days ago
Answer is 25 (9 + 16), both square numbers.
lookaguru 5 days ago 10
@lookaguru so why isnt the answer 32 when 16 and 16 are both square numbers?
memattmayor 3 days ago
@memattmayor 32 is not one of the options. 32 is not even a square number!
lookaguru 3 days ago
@MusicalAndTall I LOVE YOUR COMMENT AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHASLKDJFKASDNFKJASNDFKBJEASWLFS
DwightkSchrute101 5 days ago
@DwightkSchrute101 Haha nice name bro. Dwight ftw
MusicalAndTall 5 days ago
@MusicalAndTall I LOVE YOU
DwightkSchrute101 5 days ago
tht is the most confusing questions and trust me im not stupid in math its so easy to overthink this...4^2=16 and 2^2=4 and 2^2+2^2=16.......if i got tht fucking question wrong i woulda been furious at those motherfuckers cuz of how they worded it
yz85mp 5 days ago
@yz85mp 2^2+2^2 isnt 16, its 8...
R0botP1rate 5 days ago
@yz85mp "not stupid in math" then "2^2+2^2=16" literally in the same sentence... wow.
nessdude14 2 days ago
@yz85mp '2^2+2^2=16' LOL
gofish8195 1 day ago
why did so many people think it was 16? what square numbers where they thinking of?? ... do they just not know what square numbers are ? >.<
Ash243x 5 days ago
@Ash243x I'm betting a lot of people miscalculated 4^2=8 to get 8+8=16.
WannabeTesla 4 days ago
@WannabeTesla maybe... I think my brain is so fundamentally different from most people after 4 years of engineering college that I couldn't comprehend not knowing math xD
Ash243x 4 days ago
stupid americans... cant even do this simple math, but launch a satelite to saturn... how is this possible...???
kdsmacks 5 days ago
@kdsmacks by throwing LOTS of money at the problem.
Ash243x 5 days ago
16+9=25
MrTab001 6 days ago
@MrTab001 4² + 3² = 5²
mirabilis 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How the fuck can you fail to this... -,-
Even a god damn 6 years old could answer that -,-
TheUnPlayable 6 days ago
Comment removed
TheUnPlayable 6 days ago
even i know the answer and i had problems to understand the sentence at the beginning i am 15 and english is not my primary language
Gangster5759 6 days ago
@Gangster5759 same here^^ i had to think about it like 2minutes but then i got it and i also had problems with the sentence^^
ChamboDubstep 5 days ago
even i knew that yet i never took no damn algebra 25
ninendowii2000 6 days ago
Oh dear god.
kawnstar 6 days ago
70% of people are n00bs
spyridon77 6 days ago 28
@spyridon77 i guess u meant canndy-assed-faggots right?
SlightlyAdvanced 6 days ago
@spyridon77 You don't need this clip to make a statement like that hahahaha!
RmonSP 5 days ago
Actually I retract my last comment, I understand the confusion now.
Sorry I questioned your intelligence Americans, it's not the first time I've seen a really stupidly worded or even wrong question on the American WWTBAM.
"Which also happens to be the sum of two smaller square numbers".
4 is smaller, it's a square number. Take two of them, multiply them together and it's 16.
The question is ambiguous and should've considered saying "two different smaller square numbers.".
FluffyFooFookins 6 days ago
@FluffyFooFookins The question says the SUM of TWO smaller square numbers. When you MULTIPLY 4 by 4, by definition it is the SUM of 4 + 4 + 4 + 4 which a SUM of FOUR smaller square numbers. When you MULTIPLY, the answer is called the PRODUCT. The question is perfectly ambiguous if you actually know what mathematical terms mean. The guy and the american audience fell into a classic primary school math test trap.
Spagettanator 6 days ago
@Spagettanator
I understand that, I'm just saying I understand how the confusion happened.
The problem with the audience is that they don't get the terminology, not that they can't add up.
Just suggesting a way that it could help.
I came up with my second post after asking someone else and getting a realization from the way their mind was working. They've got multiply on the brain, it's a good trap to be fair as it can play on how the mind works.
FluffyFooFookins 6 days ago
@FluffyFooFookins Well, such is the nature of asking people question for money. You want to make it challenging or what is the fun in watching. Still, it's a very basic mistake, and using the "question was not ambiguous enough" statement is just a poor excuse. My point was, it was ambiguous enough, the guy just doesn't know what he needed to know to answer the question. Neither did the audience; that disappoints me more.
Spagettanator 6 days ago
FluffyFooFookins 6 days ago
@FluffyFooFookins it's a pretty easy mistake to make, i had to think about it for a while. it may be that people think that the question means which of the square numbers is created by a smaller sqaure number... as in 2X2=4 and 4X4=16. retarded, sure, but understandable
paulz710 6 days ago
If you undesrtand sums and squares you don't even to know Pythagoras dammit, they just automatically turn their brains off when math appears, trying to calculate won't cost ya penny.
FreeeeS 6 days ago
It's AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Baeal 6 days ago
They should only use sports questions. Those are the ones I can not answer.
pcuimac 6 days ago
The studio audience is usually smarter than the AOL audience. The only answers rated higher by the studio were A and B and B had a bigger drop to the AOL audience. Therefore B is the right answer. Or you could just do the math yourself.
Duke1839 6 days ago
I thought it was 16 too.
BoxxyFan 6 days ago
16
torres1850 6 days ago
WOW, surprised the audience didn't have a clue either.
nathan4444444444 6 days ago
Horribly worded problem. I go to MIT and it took me 10 seconds.
TheManInTheShower 6 days ago
its sad this is college weak he is pathetic. im in 11th grade already taking pre-calc and this was easier than watching tv
AbdullahBklyn 6 days ago
this is why Canadians laugh at you fucking stupid americans!