Great video, thanks CATO! Don Devine describes the trouble in defining conservative foreign policy. It should begin with defining conservatism: fiscally and constitutionally limited government; then applying that definition to foreign policy, addressing only real threats to our security interests with military force after the people, through their congress, have voted to do so. For more ongoing discussion on this theory, check out my wordpress blog: littlebrothergov
It's unrealistic to think that whatever happens in Afghanistan isn't directly affected by Pakistan in the same way that Iran pulls strings in Iraq. We could "train" the Afghan army for the next 100 years and it will be irrelevent without a STRONG and COMPETENT central government in Kabul coupled with enough pressure on Pakistan to stop supporting the Taliban.
31:11 Eaglen talks about World War II, but neglects the causal relationship between the Versailles Treaty and Hitler coming to power in the first place. Also, why do hawkish think tanks always go back to World War II when arguing about intervention?
@MooseOfReason Because it's not controversial and we won that one. It's the same reason the doves don't make movies about the Korean War, rarely the Vietnam War and they squash any talk about the Iran Contra.
Great video, thanks CATO! Don Devine describes the trouble in defining conservative foreign policy. It should begin with defining conservatism: fiscally and constitutionally limited government; then applying that definition to foreign policy, addressing only real threats to our security interests with military force after the people, through their congress, have voted to do so. For more ongoing discussion on this theory, check out my wordpress blog: littlebrothergov
bullsteve89 2 weeks ago
Cant we please everybody?
How about combining both ideas?
Escalate the withdrawal!
XCritonX 1 month ago
It's unrealistic to think that whatever happens in Afghanistan isn't directly affected by Pakistan in the same way that Iran pulls strings in Iraq. We could "train" the Afghan army for the next 100 years and it will be irrelevent without a STRONG and COMPETENT central government in Kabul coupled with enough pressure on Pakistan to stop supporting the Taliban.
John4566442 1 month ago
FK THOUGHT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT SEX.
TheAntiPC 1 month ago
Withdraw, yesterday.
gsuitter 1 month ago
I like Tony Blankley, so I shall like this upload.
necrom666 1 month ago
Jeez. How was Malou NOT a panelist?? She is the most informed.
stevemcgee99 1 month ago 2
these panelist are pathetic and not informed.
inayet 1 month ago
31:11 Eaglen talks about World War II, but neglects the causal relationship between the Versailles Treaty and Hitler coming to power in the first place. Also, why do hawkish think tanks always go back to World War II when arguing about intervention?
MooseOfReason 1 month ago 3
@MooseOfReason Because it's not controversial and we won that one. It's the same reason the doves don't make movies about the Korean War, rarely the Vietnam War and they squash any talk about the Iran Contra.
CaptainLazerus 1 month ago
@MooseOfReason was that a rhetorical question ?
LeGioNoFZioN 1 month ago
@LeGioNoFZioN Somewhat.
MooseOfReason 1 month ago
@MooseOfReason ok, I would have answered if you were looking to discuss but I wasn't sure. Cheers !
LeGioNoFZioN 1 month ago