Liked and saved. My own experiments have indicated the possibility of using odds and evens as a control device for manipulaing torque, speed, direction, and power, and loadf management
I had a crazy idea, in terms of what Steven Mark mentioned once. Counter rotating fields. What would happen if one disk had a coil more and the other a coil less than magnets available?
@rensseak Very good thinking! You would get one going CW and the other going CCW but these are not rotating magnetic fields, it is just the mid-point of the coil/rotor magnet interaction.
I will try the double off-set idea one day Ren and let you know how it goes.
but there are rising another question if it would be better that the rotor has then an uneven nummber of magnets. I did as you showed with 9 magnets as rotor and stator one site 8 coils other site 10 coils.
I think I see why romero has the events happening counter to the rotor travel. as I watched your video it occurred to me that in the first example, it looked like the events were driving the rotation, where in the 2nd example it would appear the pulses were "pushing" the events.
perhaps that is part of the efficiency, the pulses rotation add to the rotor rotation
not sure if that is significant or not, but just what I saw when i watched it
very simple and nice presentation. Though i'm not sure it makes a difference to the output, it might make influence the coil/magnet interaction of the next event
Didn't the muller type have 2 rings of magnets and coils ? then the 'Event' can travel both directions in one step so creating vortex like interactions just like in the John Searl rollers.
Liked and saved. My own experiments have indicated the possibility of using odds and evens as a control device for manipulaing torque, speed, direction, and power, and loadf management
radiowwww 1 month ago
I had a crazy idea, in terms of what Steven Mark mentioned once. Counter rotating fields. What would happen if one disk had a coil more and the other a coil less than magnets available?
rensseak 9 months ago
@rensseak Very good thinking! You would get one going CW and the other going CCW but these are not rotating magnetic fields, it is just the mid-point of the coil/rotor magnet interaction.
I will try the double off-set idea one day Ren and let you know how it goes.
WaxingRadiance 9 months ago
@WaxingRadiance
but there are rising another question if it would be better that the rotor has then an uneven nummber of magnets. I did as you showed with 9 magnets as rotor and stator one site 8 coils other site 10 coils.
watch?v=tSUBlYL_5p8
rensseak 9 months ago
I think I see why romero has the events happening counter to the rotor travel. as I watched your video it occurred to me that in the first example, it looked like the events were driving the rotation, where in the 2nd example it would appear the pulses were "pushing" the events.
perhaps that is part of the efficiency, the pulses rotation add to the rotor rotation
not sure if that is significant or not, but just what I saw when i watched it
very clever idea!! thanks for posting
picturen8 9 months ago
very simple and nice presentation. Though i'm not sure it makes a difference to the output, it might make influence the coil/magnet interaction of the next event
jozsab1 9 months ago
Brilliant for sure. Great observation.
plengo 9 months ago
Brilliant !!! You are a genius sir!!!
2TEKTRON2 9 months ago
Thanks for sharing this, this is an awesome view of what's happening, makes my mind travel.
min2oly 9 months ago
Didn't the muller type have 2 rings of magnets and coils ? then the 'Event' can travel both directions in one step so creating vortex like interactions just like in the John Searl rollers.
txqNL 9 months ago