Added: 2 years ago
From: parnama
Views: 17,900
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • sigma 55-200?

  • Thanks brother!  are you on facebook?

  • Thanks brother!

  • can you tell me how to use the continuous speed the manual is confusing

  • @iChristian91206

    in witch mode do you mean ?

    if you think the manual is confusing try use Program mode and just change the on the camera so it take full 6,3 fps and not 1 pic att the time

  • @iChristian91206 So I just turn the mode dial to "P" and it will automatically start it? Sorry I sound retarded I am new to the 50D.

  • @iChristian91206

    no it wont automatically start it you have to sett it on , read the users manuall =)

    its kind of hard to explain , im from swe so my english is kind of bad :P

  • @parnama The user manual is very confusing lol. I put the camera on "p" then what do I do next? Can you post a vid on how to set up the burst on your 50D? :)

  • @iChristian91206

    i fixed a vid on how to fix you problem =) check it out on my channel

  • lol agreed. I started with a Tamron 28-80 3.5-5.6/70-300

    now i have a 15mmFisheye, 16-35 Canon, 24-70 Canon and a 70-200 Canon all 2.8

  • @deleon88 shit, i fucking envy you d be over the moon with the 24-70

  • @WorkTightProductions It just takes time! Just save here and there and you'll be able to pull it off.

  • what lens is that?

  • I think it's the Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6 DG Macro lens...

    Very bad image quality

  • lol...seriously?..how come the quality is bad?

  • It's one of the cheapest 70-300 mm lens, I've sold the lens because there's so much chromatic abberation noticeable between 150 and 300 mm. Also the focus is very slow and makes a terrible noise. It's the worst lens I've ever had.

    2 months ago I've bought a Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L USM, I love this lens!

  • i have the tamron 75-300 f/4-5.6.... it is pretty bad. with bad chromatic abberation throughout the entire zoom range.. id love a tamron or canon 70-200 f/2.8 (or in my budget the canon f/4). But its still a lot

  • your face is bad quality

  • whats so funny ? thare are allot of lenses that are more expensive then the most expensive camera bodys. ex an 1D MarkIII Costs like 38 tousen and i can name over 10 L series lenses that costs more then 38 tousen. iam not an pro photografer, im a chef. i like the 50D beacuse i can afford it and i compensate it whit Sharp lenses of the highest quality. sorry for bad english !

  • I think its funny the Body costs less then the lenses you buy for it ;)

  • agree. i got som other lenses like. 24-70mm2.8L 50mm1.4. and 70-200mm 2.8 IS L =) its not an chep hobby :P

  • its a crapy lens from sigma 70-300mm F/4.0-5.6 .

  • I agree. It ain't that good. But you can tell from the pricetag. It's around $140 in Sweden. You can't really count on gettin' anything good from that ammount. It's not like the Canon EF 50mm f1.8/f1.4 wich is in the $1000-class.

  • What lens is on the camera ?

    Thanks

  • if you can wait for the 60D will be released this fall... with HD video =)

  • its a realy good camera. 16 RAW Pics in a burst.

  • Thanks for the upload. I have an EOS 450D XSi and sometimes get frustrated with the 3.5fps 6 RAW image bursts. This will definitely be my next camera. If I'm not mistaken, it can shoot about 12-16 RAW bursts?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more