Good way to keep the real problem for later. The New Deal had a lot of law to keep the bankster from destroying the economy. Almost all of these law have been abolished and we all know where it led us.
It's a sad day when even the British, the very people who invented Robin Hood, don't even remember the story of Robin Hood.
To those who don't remember (and it seems to be everybody) Robin Hood stole tax collections from the corupt government and returned it to the people who were paying taxes.
The equivelent would be for the government to actually cut taxes or do away with them altogether, not increase them.
DA BASTERD TAKE OUR TAX AND KEEP IN THERE OWN POCKET SPECKING (HYPOTECTICALLY) IT'S TIME WE THEY STARED DA RESSANTION IT TIME DA FUKING HELP POWER OV DA PEPOLE WE ARE DA PEPOLE IT TIME WE TAKE A STANd
"Europes President, Herman Van Rompuy wants common economic governance. Some Commissioners are fantasising about an EU income tax. Even the more moderate ones want some form of direct Brussels revenue, either in the form of EU eco-taxes or of a levy on banks. To them, the Greek crisis is a Heaven-sent opportunity."
Statism - bigger government, less liberty and democracy. Robin Hood tax? more like Sheriff of Nottingham tax.
"Van Rompuy is calling to scrap national identity in favor of a European identity and wants to institute Euro involvement in local town halls, schools, sports and green taxes on all 27 member nations."
"The EU President (Van Rompuy) is arguing for a European version of the Tobin-Tax, which is a tax on financial transactions. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called for this tax over the summer"
Ever larger undemocratic superstate presided over by the corrupt.
Incoming monies of all receipts each year are sent to syndicated media, deans & editors. States send in CFAR reports - June. So the system busies itself in payoffs to institutes in return for a disinformed public. Payoffs are costly in itself in that a raping of public funds occurs. Instead of paying into the infrastructure, skimming occurs in the payoff process. That banks refer to working class as the poor is for the failing to discern a voice, time & value of the thought thinking mindseye!
No Robin Hood stole from the rich and redistributed said money down to the poor (and remember Robin Hood is a myth). Please bear in mind that this is a tax and not a method of clawing back loans to be repaid; that debt must be honored as well. All said great idea bring it on.
@behemoth36100 If we are talking about the Robin Hood of British myth, then here's the basics:
RH stole money from the Sheriff and tax collectors of John of England, who was ruling in King Richard's absence. John raised taxes, claiming it was for the Crusades, but it went to his own pockets.
RH stole from a corupt government to return money to the poor.
The money in the banks over the country belongs to you the public TAX payer "yes" so you put your money in banks and you get TAX by the bank and they trade this money on the STOCK MARKET (your money) and the profits pay's BANKERS and the SHAREHOLDERS and if there is anything left over we get back as little interest which as you know is low at the moment so this TAX ON BANKS is coming out of your pocket TAX payers because it's your MONEY good A
This is a brilliant idea and I'm not a socialist, but a true Conservative. A transaction tax works because banks will still trade just as much when there is profit in it for themselves or their client. The tax is at such a low threshold that any profits on the transaction will vastly outweigh the transaction charge. Also, it doesn't matter if banks pass on the charge to their client, the money that has been invested will still make huge profits as long as it is a good investment.
Robin Hood who I'm a fan of, stole from the rich TAX COLLECTORS to give to the poor. He wasn't a tax collector. This idea is just a big political tax (theft) funding other organizations you would not donate to.
I think your looking for Jesse James a bank robber not Robin Hood. Banks should pay back the money given to them with 30% interest since they had bad credit when the received it. Drink Tea_ throw the politicians in the Harbor
This video is foolish------ Didn't Robin Hood take from the rich TAX COLLECTORS to give to the poor? Aren't you becoming the tax collector. You just want to force fund organizations that people don't want to donate to. The entire problem is caused by Politicians... Drink Tea_throw the politicians in the Harbor. HOPE I haven't offended you :)
Tax is generally needed to keep various services going, which by extension help the community as a whole.
If the people receiving the 'tax' are charities then its fairly safe to say the money is going to be well spent. ( better than ending up being a percentage of profit on a tiny minority at any rate)
Yes the problem is caused by Politicians who in turn are working for the sake/finance of big corporations, so whats your answer to that problem? Throwing them in Harbour is a drop in the ocean.
Sadly, that is likely to be the end result. Like when cell phone number portability was voted in. What's that cost - $1 month, even though I do not use it? I would much rather see significant banking reform. An end to overly leveraged CDSs, for instance, would be much more useful. Meaningful risk assessment on securities (CDOs). Then we would not have to bail the greedy little piggies in the first place. In other words, make them earn money, not print it.
This is not really a revenue making scheme. The point of such a tax is to create a more stable ecomony.The tax would be such a small amount on transactions that it would only affect a financial instituion if it regularly engages in short term, high risk speculation. Long term investment would be taxed at such a low real amount that it would hardly be noticed.
Do you think banks wont replenish this money leak from their customers? And what would this money go for? Fighting global warming, spending bilions $ for reducing CO2 for ab. 0,00001%? Or maybe helping 3rd world countries? - imo when you only pomp huge amount of money it usually lead to wars etc... It takes time and many committed people for changes which actually can make life in the 3d world better.
Banks received multibillion support from the taxpayers so now they should give it back what they have received.
The free market is a myth - People like Sarkozy, Obama, Merkel and Brown are closer to the Communists than to the liberal terms of books for the naive.
If the moneys are being used to not go into the pocket of the IMF, and these other banks that will be the "shareholders" and "representatives" of CLIMATE Change, and instead goes into the charities and organizations which feed and house people properly, and see that there is clean water available, and that pollution free industry is promoted, and self-sufficiency remains as the goal, I would certainly vote "yes". The problem is banks funding the actions of other banks, just wouldn't be a help.
Good way to keep the real problem for later. The New Deal had a lot of law to keep the bankster from destroying the economy. Almost all of these law have been abolished and we all know where it led us.
Aanthaf 1 month ago
publicity seeker!!!!!!!!!!!!
VanRomPuyArse 4 months ago
you are a good actor but this has NOTHING to do with you , stick to acting, we dont need any more taxes !!!!!!!
VanRomPuyArse 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's a sad day when even the British, the very people who invented Robin Hood, don't even remember the story of Robin Hood.
To those who don't remember (and it seems to be everybody) Robin Hood stole tax collections from the corupt government and returned it to the people who were paying taxes.
The equivelent would be for the government to actually cut taxes or do away with them altogether, not increase them.
bsabruzzo 1 year ago
DA BASTERD TAKE OUR TAX AND KEEP IN THERE OWN POCKET SPECKING (HYPOTECTICALLY) IT'S TIME WE THEY STARED DA RESSANTION IT TIME DA FUKING HELP POWER OV DA PEPOLE WE ARE DA PEPOLE IT TIME WE TAKE A STANd
MrAloo14 1 year ago
@MrAloo14 I hope your not on benefits and saying this?
TheonlyZouga 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrAloo14 1 year ago
This was good but somebody slowed it down, took 30 minutes to upload!!! The rich people are so sly!
bscottfree 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The EU wants pan-European taxation"
"Europes President, Herman Van Rompuy wants common economic governance. Some Commissioners are fantasising about an EU income tax. Even the more moderate ones want some form of direct Brussels revenue, either in the form of EU eco-taxes or of a levy on banks. To them, the Greek crisis is a Heaven-sent opportunity."
Statism - bigger government, less liberty and democracy. Robin Hood tax? more like Sheriff of Nottingham tax.
WinstonSmith46 2 years ago
I love when he says "a hundred billion pounds" and Bill Nighy blinks on every syllable.
bones22j 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Van Rompuy is calling to scrap national identity in favor of a European identity and wants to institute Euro involvement in local town halls, schools, sports and green taxes on all 27 member nations."
"The EU President (Van Rompuy) is arguing for a European version of the Tobin-Tax, which is a tax on financial transactions. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called for this tax over the summer"
Ever larger undemocratic superstate presided over by the corrupt.
WinstonSmith46 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Taxation has gone too far already.
WinstonSmith46 2 years ago
Incoming monies of all receipts each year are sent to syndicated media, deans & editors. States send in CFAR reports - June. So the system busies itself in payoffs to institutes in return for a disinformed public. Payoffs are costly in itself in that a raping of public funds occurs. Instead of paying into the infrastructure, skimming occurs in the payoff process. That banks refer to working class as the poor is for the failing to discern a voice, time & value of the thought thinking mindseye!
intrascoobz 2 years ago
No Robin Hood stole from the rich and redistributed said money down to the poor (and remember Robin Hood is a myth). Please bear in mind that this is a tax and not a method of clawing back loans to be repaid; that debt must be honored as well. All said great idea bring it on.
behemoth36100 2 years ago 4
Very well said!
Mehbz 2 years ago
@behemoth36100 If we are talking about the Robin Hood of British myth, then here's the basics:
RH stole money from the Sheriff and tax collectors of John of England, who was ruling in King Richard's absence. John raised taxes, claiming it was for the Crusades, but it went to his own pockets.
RH stole from a corupt government to return money to the poor.
bsabruzzo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As my mother used to say, there should be a special place in hell for bankers and insurance men.
The tax is a fine idea, though I suspect they would just raise fees and find NEW ways of screwing their customers.
Personally, I think it's time to oil and sharpen the old guillotines
billmatteson 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think this is a dad thing!
I'll explain
The money in the banks over the country belongs to you the public TAX payer "yes" so you put your money in banks and you get TAX by the bank and they trade this money on the STOCK MARKET (your money) and the profits pay's BANKERS and the SHAREHOLDERS and if there is anything left over we get back as little interest which as you know is low at the moment so this TAX ON BANKS is coming out of your pocket TAX payers because it's your MONEY good A
peace
beaverbox 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is a brilliant idea and I'm not a socialist, but a true Conservative. A transaction tax works because banks will still trade just as much when there is profit in it for themselves or their client. The tax is at such a low threshold that any profits on the transaction will vastly outweigh the transaction charge. Also, it doesn't matter if banks pass on the charge to their client, the money that has been invested will still make huge profits as long as it is a good investment.
jbarks10 2 years ago
Robin Hood who I'm a fan of, stole from the rich TAX COLLECTORS to give to the poor. He wasn't a tax collector. This idea is just a big political tax (theft) funding other organizations you would not donate to.
I think your looking for Jesse James a bank robber not Robin Hood. Banks should pay back the money given to them with 30% interest since they had bad credit when the received it. Drink Tea_ throw the politicians in the Harbor
PilotOlms 2 years ago
A reminder to all the cretins that are spamming this video with their idiotic or needlessly negative knee jerk reactions:
This idea was instigated by a large collection of charities, so the money is or at least would be aimed at helping charities to carry out their work.
To bemoan and nitpick this idea is to damn charity of any kind or form and for that a pity and despise you for it.
ENGLISHBL0KE 2 years ago
This video is foolish------ Didn't Robin Hood take from the rich TAX COLLECTORS to give to the poor? Aren't you becoming the tax collector. You just want to force fund organizations that people don't want to donate to. The entire problem is caused by Politicians... Drink Tea_throw the politicians in the Harbor. HOPE I haven't offended you :)
PilotOlms 2 years ago
Tax is generally needed to keep various services going, which by extension help the community as a whole.
If the people receiving the 'tax' are charities then its fairly safe to say the money is going to be well spent. ( better than ending up being a percentage of profit on a tiny minority at any rate)
Yes the problem is caused by Politicians who in turn are working for the sake/finance of big corporations, so whats your answer to that problem? Throwing them in Harbour is a drop in the ocean.
ENGLISHBL0KE 2 years ago
They are just going to raise our frees to pay for this tax too.
Stop stealing from everyone!
peace
llandshark 2 years ago
Sadly, that is likely to be the end result. Like when cell phone number portability was voted in. What's that cost - $1 month, even though I do not use it? I would much rather see significant banking reform. An end to overly leveraged CDSs, for instance, would be much more useful. Meaningful risk assessment on securities (CDOs). Then we would not have to bail the greedy little piggies in the first place. In other words, make them earn money, not print it.
mikeporterinmd 2 years ago
This is not really a revenue making scheme. The point of such a tax is to create a more stable ecomony.The tax would be such a small amount on transactions that it would only affect a financial instituion if it regularly engages in short term, high risk speculation. Long term investment would be taxed at such a low real amount that it would hardly be noticed.
MrWilliam365 2 years ago
This is BS, slapping on a plaster for an dismembered leg. The recession is not going to go away folks - this is simply to calm the masses.
When a monetary system is based on debt, what do you expect?
So where does the tax go? To the government? What so they can pay off the national debt? LOL so it goes back to the banks ;)
wideshutuk 2 years ago
Do you think banks wont replenish this money leak from their customers? And what would this money go for? Fighting global warming, spending bilions $ for reducing CO2 for ab. 0,00001%? Or maybe helping 3rd world countries? - imo when you only pomp huge amount of money it usually lead to wars etc... It takes time and many committed people for changes which actually can make life in the 3d world better.
tt214570 2 years ago
Banks received multibillion support from the taxpayers so now they should give it back what they have received.
The free market is a myth - People like Sarkozy, Obama, Merkel and Brown are closer to the Communists than to the liberal terms of books for the naive.
febus1 2 years ago
You would have to be mentally retarded or a soulless **** to think this is anything other than a superb idea.
ENGLISHBL0KE 2 years ago
This is not robin hood idea,this is communism.
vadyxxx 2 years ago
Spread the word. get people involved in the voting yes for this tax.
Check out the Facebook Group
h t t p : / / w w w . f a c e b o o k . c o m / g r o u p . p h p ? g i d= 3 0 0 8 6 0 3 7 6 0 6 6
let's make it happen !!
richard1973 2 years ago
This is a fantastic idea. everybody needs to get behind this.
richard1973 2 years ago
If the moneys are being used to not go into the pocket of the IMF, and these other banks that will be the "shareholders" and "representatives" of CLIMATE Change, and instead goes into the charities and organizations which feed and house people properly, and see that there is clean water available, and that pollution free industry is promoted, and self-sufficiency remains as the goal, I would certainly vote "yes". The problem is banks funding the actions of other banks, just wouldn't be a help.
AlterEgoTrip 2 years ago
Wondeful video, great actor and highlights the ridiculousness of it all just perfectly, I hope it's seen by the whole world
crystal934onvox 2 years ago
Makes you wonder just how much money is swimming around out there far out of reach of 99% of the rest of us !
mo1912 2 years ago
we should all surport this great idea....
danemsteve 2 years ago
Finally someone is making sense.
behemoth36100 2 years ago
This is the future
sahmsahm 2 years ago
That was also said about communism, look how that turned out.
WinstonSmith46 2 years ago