Do something more constructive with your camera, your microphone & your time.
Like, drive to the highest point of the center of a suspension bridge. I hear the view from those is spectacular.
When you get there , put the camera on record, hold it to your eye , look down over the side, click on zoom .......................................& jump.
Don't cheat on the way down & take the camera away from your eye. Take my word for it, it's not as close as it may look through the view finder.
@dreamdiction Here's how I can make it look like I'm responding to you without you being notified of my comment. But I don't believe in deception so I won't do it.
@PoetryHound I've given links showing many people were killed and injured by big explosions in the basements of the Towers and Building 7. Were Israelis pre-weakling WTC structure? Or were Israelis practicing for Operation Cast Lead?
NIST admits 2.5 seconds of freefall acceleration at WTC 7, proving that 24 vertical columns were simultaneously cut on at least 20 floors: 20x24=480 simultaneous themite column cutters. If you say WTC7 died from natural causes then you are a kook.
Hey FromDreamz2Reality, don't worry about it. The 911 truther movement is in steep decline. Hits on conspiracy sites have plummeted since their peak in 2006. Attendance at 911 conspiracy rallies has likewise plummeted. The idiotic demolition theories aren't found in any construction or engineering texts or classrooms anywhere on Earth. The conspiracy garbage isn't found in scientific journals or conference proceedings. Congratulations, kooks! You're nothing but an internet rumor.
Thousands witnessed planes hitting WTC so all the "no planes" bullshit is cointell disinfo to distract attention from the REAL 9/11 Inside Job evidence.
We know that no plane hit WTC 7 but it collapsed in a perfect demonstration of controlled demolition which makes WTC 7 the MAJOR inside job evidence.
Search YouTube for "wtc basement explosion" and you will find that over a hundred people witnessed the death and serious injury suffered by over 30 people from basement explosions in all towers.
@dreamdiction Did you know that jet fuel-ignited fireballs blew out elevators on multiple floors, including the basement? Besides, think for a minute. The towers collapsed from the top. How would an explosion in the basement help bring down a building from the top down? Makes no sense. But thanks for contributing to what is nothing more than an internet rumor!
@PoetryHound Your Israeli disinfo conspiracy crap about "jet-fuelled fireballs" travelling down the lift shafts is totally contradicted by the fact that all the WTC 1 & 2 lift shafts were divided into three separate stages. People going to the 88th the floor MUST get out of the first lift when it reached the top of it's shaft, then they MUST get into a difference lift at the beginning of the next shaft.
There were no lift shafts from the 88th floor to the ground/basement level.
@dreamdiction Your Tanzanian disinfo conspiracy crap about separatated elevator shafts is contradicted by the fact that while the elevators were ran in three segments, the actual SHAFTS ran the length of the buildings as you could have easily found out. In addition, each tower had a freight elevator that ran the full length of the towers and had 2 elevators that ran from the lobby to the top - that is, to the restaurant in WTC 1 and the observation deck in WTC 2.
@dreamdiction (cont'd) Just to be clear, the elevator shafts were divided by pans into separate segments. It's not the elevator routes that are important here. It's the shafts.
BTW, witnesses at the sites of the blown out elevators reported that there was a strong smell of kerosene at those sites. What do you suppose would cause that smell?
@PoetryHound The WTC towers were 1140ft tall. The upper limit for lift shafts is 400ft because of "cable weight" and "cable stretch". There were NO LIFT SHAFTS from the 88th floor to the Ground. None.
The lies of Israelis on YouTube have done more than anything to convince an ever increasing number of people that Israel attacked America on 9/11. Israel wants the US to attack Iran but America will not fight any more of Israel’s wars.
@dreamdiction You're still wrong. If lift shafts can't gomore than 400 feet, then how were people able to ride elevators from the lobby up to Windows on the World?
You Tanzanians love to lie about this shit. I don't give a shit about your anti-Israel blah blah propaganda. You got the elevator shaft info dead wrong.
@PoetryHound For over 3 years on Youtube you have been posting Israeli 9/11 lies every hour of every day except Shabbat. The people who pay you as an Israeli Trainee Diplomat, tell you that if you work hard they will support your application to join MOSSAD. Your handlers are lying and they think its funny that you swallowed their bait because they’ll keep you as a low-grade typist forever. Why don’t you get a proper job & stop wasting money on those Russian prostitutes in Tel Aviv.
@dreamdiction You're a paranoid Tanzanian nutjob. You got the elevator shaft thing dead wrong and now you're just acting like a sore loser. Admit your mistake and move on. Get some meds.
@dreamdiction BTW, you Tanzanian stooge and spy, if you still think you're right about the elevator shaft nonsense, then all you have to do is answer these 2 simple questions:
1. If 400 feet is the limit, how were people able to ride an elevator from the lobby straight to Windows on the World at the top?
2. Witnesses who observed the blown out elevators said there was a strong smell of kerosene at the scene. What would cause that smell?
@PoetryHound Firemen said, "the lobby looked like a bomb had exploded in the lobby". There is no lift from the lobby to the 88th floor.
Even if only one part of the 9/11 story is a lie, then the whole 9/11 story is a lie.
WTC 7 was controlled demolition and the three dancing Israelis admitted on Israeli TV that they were MOSSAD agents who were in New York to "record the event".
Foreknowledge equals complicity therefore Israel attacked America on 9/11.
@dreamdiction "There is no lift from the lobby to the 88th floor."
There were elevators from the lobby to the top of the building.
I might have known you'd drag the asinine Israel-did-it assertion into this. Lots of people were there recording the event, dumb dumb. They never indicated they knew about 9/11 in advance. This is just sheer stupidity on your part.
Another IGNORANT MEDIA FED PIG, WHO WONT DO THE RESEARCH AND BELIEVES EVERYTHING HE SEES ON TV AND WHAT THE GOVERMENT CONTROLLED MEDIA TEACHES HIM.... DISREGARD THIS FOOL!!!!
@jonescool1fly "Another IGNORANT MEDIA FED PIG, WHO WONT DO THE RESEARCH"
Research? Sorry, but watching Joe Blow's unaccountable, piece-of-shit YT video is not research.
So if you think the media is all government-controlled, then what are YOUR credible and reliable sources of news and information? I'll bet you can't name one specific source.
You would say it wasnt a consiracy... lol you look like ur a muslim no wonder. Go back to the middle east. America isnt a melting pot for your kind anymore. Also how old where you when 9/11 happend? 10? you dont know you werent there. Educate yourslef before you post stupid videos on youtube, you have NO facts! We are not the ones disrespeceting the victims and their families, you are by posting your ridiculous uneducated video on youtube. Please learn facts before running your mouth dumbass!
What about molten metal found under wtc 1,2 and 7? Did you see a plane actually hitting the pentagon? No? They just released 5 FRAMES!! Why? Did you see the wreckage of the plane at Shanksville? No? It was just a hole in the ground with pieces of metal in it! And to say "Why would they kill 3000 ppl" Well i'll just say ww1- sinking of the lusitania! ww2- pearl harbour! vietnam- gulf of tonkin! Do some research!!! Or go back to sleep your goverment is in control!
Independent Scientists found evidence of a high tech explosive incendiary called nanothermite in the WTC Dust. The Government scientists refused to follow standard protocol and test for the presence of explosives of any kind.
Until the Government performs a real investigation which looks into these things, then the controlled demolition conspiracy theory will never really be "Debunked"...
For a list of people and companies with suspicious connections to nanothermite: watch?v=c3jnFtSElH4
@jazzfan5000, This looks to be a blatant reach for an appeal to authority. Science is not conducted by poll or opinion. The names of these scientists is of no significance whatsoever, just like the name NIST or Popular Mechanics means nothing in light of the scientific method. All that matters is whether a particular theory can be verified by reproducible experiments. Currently the fire-induced collapse theory is not supported by experiment, and the Government still hasn't tested for explosives.
YOU UGLY FUCK! first of allOsama was a former CIA Agent... You jus proved that there was NTSB demolishen bombs planted by american gov themselves! You illeterate, the building went down straight! if a plane hits it...isnt it supposed to collapse on its side? educate yourself, then make these gay videos.
BTW Muslims didnt do this attack, your american government blinded your citizens, Brainwashed you, shredded important data relating to 9/11?
Yeah I know, I'm getting sick of seeing nothing but conspiracy theories on Youtube. Especially those dealing with 9/11. I can't go to any 9/11 related video without it being something with a conspiracy theory bent.
dont listen to the assholes commenting Man, 1500 engineers? and architects. Can you site your sources, and can your sources name names. I can throw out a number right now.
95% of engineers and fire fighting specialists say that this was not a controlled demolition. Is that true? I dunno But Im spewing it out like you assholes.
FromDreamz2Reality - Keep up the good work we need less retards making videos and more people like you making em.
I'm not sure about whether or not the mainstream conspiracy is valid; that there were demolitions and that the government was directly related to the attacks. What's more likely is that either some branch of gov. or black ops, under the guidance of a few powerful globalist, aided the terrorist in the attacks. No logical human can take the official story at face value. Fact.
You have no fucking idea what it means to have respect for victims and their families. You think if a child is killed in a car crash, that the police are just going to go up to the parents and say, "Sorry, your child has died", without ANY fucking explanation?
NO, you tell them the. fucking. truth. That isn't an insult to the ones who died, nor to the families.
So you're an expert on pantomiming controlled demolitions with your hands...wow. How much actual exploration of facts have you done to reach your conclusions? Have you seen WTC building 7 implode?
If you want to listen to some extreme folks claim some crazy shit, go ahead. If you want to be a big boy and partake in the real discussion, then do some serious researching on your own. Until then, you're just joining one side of the fray of ranters and you sound pretty dumb.
@adelsmana actually he has some common sense. Have you ever herd a contolled demo? There are dozens of loud explosions needed to bring even a small building down. Experts in demolition will say the exact same thing as well.
@adelsmana You people are nuts. Alex Jones isn't research. The kid is right conspiracy nuts like you are nuts. Here's something to think about. There's alllll these theories on the planes. Let's say the government really planted demolitions to bring the towers down. If you recall a truckload of explosives by Al Qaeda was detonated in the basement of the towers to try and bring them down: They Failed. IF the government wanted to make this into an inside job
@longhairsRcool PART 3: Hmmm...we could have gone to war without all this excess by JUST planting bombs. Why the elaborate excess; fake airplanes, fake phone calls to family members, missiles?
@adelsmana PART 2: All they would have to do is blow up the towers and say Al Qaeda used explosives again and this time they were successful. Everyone would have believed it to since they tried that in the 90s. If you recall families received phone calls from their families on the plane which I guess were faked by the CIA? Them missels launched into the Pentagon?
You say that the WTC wasn't controlled demolitioned ok what about WTC7?
Eye witnesses contradict the official story for the Pentagon hit.
I believe that this was a inside job but am I calling this a conspiracy...... yes I am
because eye witnesses and evidence contradict the official story so if this was criminal act by the US Government the families of 9/11 deserves justice.
The world trade center fell from the impact points. He is right not typical of a controll demolition. The fact ct's stick with this just shows how foolish they are.
If you find it disrespectful to the families, you should know that many of them have been appealing for a proper investigation for quite some time. Will you show some goddamn respect to THOSE people?? And if the fire was hot enough to melt steal, why is there photo and video of a woman standing, alive, waving from the impact crater of one of the planes? Was that super woman? Or did all of the heat escape into the lower parts of the building? And building 7 was hardly damaged enough to collapse.
@seanotube85 your claim is invalid, first of all Melting did not occur, nor was it needed to cause collapse. In fact the official report does not mention nor does it even make the claim that the steel melted, so that is a straw man argument you're making. What happened was the steel was weakened to the point of structural failure, steel loses 50% of it's strength by 1,100 degrees. And about the people in the windows, obviously the fires were not as intense there. Please do some real research.
@RBAWilcox Then why was there molten steel when the towers collapsed long after the smoke cleared? And put that together with the fact that the woman could stand where the plane had crashed without burning to death from the heat. So would that mean the steel melted AFTER the towers came down somehow? Or was that some other kind of glowing orange liquid? So the fires were not as intense where the planes actually crashed to begin with? That makes no sense. And buildaing 7 reached 1100 degrees?how?
@seanotube85 let me answer your question, first of all Molten steel is never left behind in controlled demolition, and if thermite was used, than the steel would be widely dispersed and would solidify within seconds. And I already stated that obviously the fires were not as intense where the women was standing, how did the steel reach 1,100 degrees, simple, most of the materials in the building were hydrocarbon substances which burn at 1,800 degrees. More than enough to weaken the steel.
@RBAWilcox They actually did find steel dust widely dispersed around the towers. And military grade Thermate (not your run of the mill thermite) actually would result in the pools of molten steel that WERE found under the collapsed towers. So that lady standing up there, where temperatures should be at their peak shows the molten steel happened AFTER the collapse. And building 7 was NOT hit by a plane full of jet fuel, so once again, how did it reach 1100 degrees and collapse?
@seanotube85 For the the last time......the fire DID NOT MELT THE STEEL, it weakened it. A fire of around 2000 degree's is hot enough to make steel lose 50% of it's strength......50%. Add 30 stories on top of where
900,000 lbs. of plane sliced through and see how long it takes before the top collapses. Building 7 was hardly damaged? Seriously, you believe that? It was more damaged than you think. Do some research, not just watch "Loose Change" and call that fact.
I agree that some things on Youtube about 9/11 being a conspiracy are insanley stupid.
But, there are videos like 9/11 In Plane Sight, and Zeitgheist that are very well put together, and have respectable people talking about why 9/11 was an inside job.
Please, if you can, watch one of those. I would prefer you watch In Plane Sight, as the other shows some things you might not want to see.
Anyhow, I hope you do watch at least one of them, take care man.
@JonT2384 Sure, Zeitgeist is well put together and so is the latest version of Loose Change (American Coup). Most of the referencing for these movies are from other conspiracy websites and are not based in fact or evidence. They just assume and believe. Some of it is just pure stupidity!
@jazzfan5000 I'm not sure where you got that from, because usually in the Zeitgeist, when they say something like, there were bombs planted in the buildings. It shows footage from everyone at the time, saying how they heard explosions, bang, bang, bang, bang, it was like a bomb went off, when we got to this floor a bomb went off, and so on.
Almost nowhere in the movie do they just say something without something to back it up. And 9/11 In Plane Sight goes even further.
@JonT2384 Yes, do you see what you said there --- "it was LIKE a bomb went off"... most witnesses said they heard explosions. If you were standing below a high rise structure and all of a sudden a jet slams into it, what do you think you would hear?
@jazzfan5000 I have to ask, have you yet to watched the Zeitgeist or 9/11 In Plane Sight?
They both show even NY Firemen agreeing on how it was like a detination, like they were planned to take down a building.
It also shows several people mentioning explosions after the planes hit. How they got to the lobby and an explosion went off, and news reporters saying they thought bombs were planted in the buildings, and so on.
They both reveal a very good amount of information on the subject.
@JonT2384 "They both show even NY Firemen agreeing on how it was like a detination, like they were planned to take down a building."
They said LIKE a controlled demolition, plus if you look at his hands, they were describing a progressive collapse. If I said I was so hungry I can eat a horse, would you lock up your horses? Learn to not take metaphors and similes literally, it just makes you look paranoid, juvenile, and foolish.
@theBartone9119 What you said is a metaphor, what he said is a simile. If you're going to talk trash, learn how to do it right.
But whatever, did you just look up that clip, or have you watched the whole movie? Even if he meant it as a simile, there's plenty of other firefighters that feel the same way. And the movie reveals much more information then I'd care to get into with you.
And if watch the movie, then you'll see they don't just talking about hearing secondary explosions.
@JonT2384 Explosions being heard during building fires is common, nobody never heard explosIVES (big difference). Examples of building fires with explosions heard:
Explosions as Firefighters Tackle Fire at Falmouth Docks:
"Jamie Clark, who was staying about 60m (200ft) from the scene of the fire, said he was woken up by explosions."
Firefighters battle three-alarm fire involving explosions
"As more firefighters responded to the fire, more callers reported hearing explosions"
Ok, jazzfan500, I am 58. I will debate you ANY DAY day on 911. This 'Kid' is obviously ignorant (that just means he does not know the facts)! NO, the 'planes' were NOT holograms, but the videos were NOT real! This is provable from the OFFICIAL videos! 100's of other facts prove 911 was and inside job! Have YOU really looked into it? I think not! IF you want to debate me, I will give you my #.
I actually can be civil, and will LISTEN to what YOU tell me! I suspect you will not! Good day!
3 years after 9/11, 40% of Americans either believed 9/11 was an inside job, or the government had knowledge of the up coming attacks. 10 years after 9/11, roughly 5% of Americans believe this. Bravo to the people who realized their theory wasn't worth the shit in a cow field. For the other 5%.....Move out of moms basement, get a job, and get a fucking life!
@FromDreamz2Reality Im not a 9/11 truther. I was making a statement about how the truth movement has died since it's peak 3 years after the events. It was nothing toward you at all, toward 9/11 Truthtards.
@Ryan198416 Over 1500 engineers and architects stated that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. It was an inside job, and the people deserve to know the truth!
@LaughsWontHurt Wrong, 1500 engineers and architects want a new investigation. Building 7 was severly damaged by the collapse of the north tower and hours before the building fell, the area was evacuated for fear it would fall. It's really not worth explaining things to you people. You want answers, you are given answers, and you chose not to believe the answers.....so continue to live in your paranoid world while the rest of us move on.
@Ryan198416 Building 7 was not severely damaged by the collapse of the north tower. The only damage building 7 sustained was some office fires and broken windows. That is not severe damage. And that is not how a building collapses when 1 pillar fails.
You were 5 when it happened, so you have lived in a 911 world pretty much your entire life. I'd like to know - when did become aware of 911, and then when did you become aware that there were people who don't believe the official story? When you first heard that, where you angry and offended? Does it shake you to your core that some people don't believe the official story? (I'm one of the people who doesn't believe the OCT, tho not hologram planes) -- Just interested.
@7Hook I first came aware of 9/11 when I was around idk 9 or 10. When the 5th year of the anniversary took place.. I remember I was with my grandma when they said "The fifth anniversary of 9/11" I turned to my grandpa and said "Grandma was 9/11 when our troops went to more ?" She then told me what 9/11 was and what happened on that day. I later became fascinated with what happened. So in the coming years I learned more and more what I happened on that day. A few years back (continued).....
@FromDreamz2Reality I actually considered it to be a conspiracy. But then recently I did enough research and common sense to determine it wasn't a conspiracy. I really think people are just paranoid when it comes to it being a conspiracy and just aren't satisfied with the actual story, so they take these wacky conspiracy theories and try to rationalize them. It's a great thrill, to think our own government did 9/11, but people need to come back to reality and face the fact bad people exist.
Can you explain to me why anyone should accept that 9/11 evidence was disposed of & we were presented with computer simulations instead of scientific analysis? Can you explain why anyone should accept the fact that the gov. & its agencies lied to the 9/11 Commission & the commissioners chose not to use the power of subpoena & pursue the liars? Let's see if you've got the minerals to face the world around you.
The missing "R" is all that's ever going to be wrong with that statement. I'm done here. I've posted my question & neither you or the kid has been able to respond to it. You're wasting your time.
No. Application of the SCIENTIFIC METHOD is the only thing applicable in an investigation. This means physical testing. If you expect people to come around to your way of thinking then you need to be able to explain why they should accept the gov. officers & experts deviation from standard investigative procedure. You need to be able to explain why they should accept that the Commission was lied to.
You, son, are ABSOLUTELY BIZARRE and VERY Annoying! I will not call you stupid, just VERY Ignorant! How much research have you done! You say we should be 'locked up' for THINKING stuff !!! You sir, are SICK and what's WRONG with America (The land that I love). Ok , NOW I have watched your whole video, and ok, NOW, I say you ARE stupid! You are STILL 5 years old! SHOVE you!! Get a life you stupid JERK!
@ratoig Are you just mad because someone that was only 5 at the time this happened, has more common sense than you do. From the post you left it sounds like you are the kid here. Shove you? calling him a stupid jerk? sounds like my 9 yr old nephew....
Why were there live hijacking simutlations being ran at the same time? Why were the fighters from NATO in northern canada and alaska at the same time? Why did Bush just sit in that school reading to children when the first plane struck? What person in there right mind would just sit there? Even with it just being a terrible accident at the time the president can't just sit there.
Dude some theorys are crazy I know like no one died but don't just watch these youtube videos check the facts flight 93 is still being used 9 of the terrorists are still alive or were after 9/11 not even half of the people in nyc believe it was a terrorist attack. Dissention is the greatest act of a patriot don't think wanting answers is disrespectful think of it as a way to honor the lives lost.
@jdgir218 Where do you get these bullshit "facts" show me where flight 93 is being flown? Prove to me the hijackers are alive. Dont just tell me.....PROVE IT, show me proof?
Do something more constructive with your camera, your microphone & your time.
Like, drive to the highest point of the center of a suspension bridge. I hear the view from those is spectacular.
When you get there , put the camera on record, hold it to your eye , look down over the side, click on zoom .......................................& jump.
Don't cheat on the way down & take the camera away from your eye. Take my word for it, it's not as close as it may look through the view finder.
MUMS007 1 day ago
bin laden job or inside job, either way it's a conspiracy and you're a fuckwit
CharlieVeitch911LIAR 1 week ago
@dreamdiction Here's how I can make it look like I'm responding to you without you being notified of my comment. But I don't believe in deception so I won't do it.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
9/11 Absolute Evidence Of Massive Explosions in Basement of WTC Long Before Collapse.
/watch?v=UhGcBxONSvc
dreamdiction 1 week ago
@dreamdiction You're forgetting to answer some questions. Here are two more.
3. How does an explosion in the basement bring down a building from the top down? That makes no sense.
4. Why would someone set off detonation charges well before collapse?
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@PoetryHound I've given links showing many people were killed and injured by big explosions in the basements of the Towers and Building 7. Were Israelis pre-weakling WTC structure? Or were Israelis practicing for Operation Cast Lead?
NIST admits 2.5 seconds of freefall acceleration at WTC 7, proving that 24 vertical columns were simultaneously cut on at least 20 floors: 20x24=480 simultaneous themite column cutters. If you say WTC7 died from natural causes then you are a kook.
dreamdiction 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dreamdiction
1. If 400 feet is the limit as you claim, how were people able to ride an elevator from the lobby straight to Windows on the World at the top?
2. Witnesses who observed the blown out elevators said there was a strong smell of kerosene at the scene. What would cause that smell?
3. How does an explosion in the basement bring down a building from the top down?
4. Why would someone set off detonation charges well before collapse?
PoetryHound 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dreamdiction Here are my questions to you.
1. If 400 feet is the limit for elecators, how were people able to ride an elevator from the lobby straight to Windows on the World at the top?
2. Witnesses who observed the blown out elevators said there was a strong smell of kerosene at the scene. What would cause that smell?
3. How does an explosion in the basement bring down a building from the top down?
4. Why would someone set off detonation charges well before collapse?
bagintree 1 week ago
BUILDING SEVEN
XsamwiseX45 1 week ago
Hey FromDreamz2Reality, don't worry about it. The 911 truther movement is in steep decline. Hits on conspiracy sites have plummeted since their peak in 2006. Attendance at 911 conspiracy rallies has likewise plummeted. The idiotic demolition theories aren't found in any construction or engineering texts or classrooms anywhere on Earth. The conspiracy garbage isn't found in scientific journals or conference proceedings. Congratulations, kooks! You're nothing but an internet rumor.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
Thousands witnessed planes hitting WTC so all the "no planes" bullshit is cointell disinfo to distract attention from the REAL 9/11 Inside Job evidence.
We know that no plane hit WTC 7 but it collapsed in a perfect demonstration of controlled demolition which makes WTC 7 the MAJOR inside job evidence.
Search YouTube for "wtc basement explosion" and you will find that over a hundred people witnessed the death and serious injury suffered by over 30 people from basement explosions in all towers.
dreamdiction 1 week ago
@dreamdiction Did you know that jet fuel-ignited fireballs blew out elevators on multiple floors, including the basement? Besides, think for a minute. The towers collapsed from the top. How would an explosion in the basement help bring down a building from the top down? Makes no sense. But thanks for contributing to what is nothing more than an internet rumor!
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@PoetryHound Your Israeli disinfo conspiracy crap about "jet-fuelled fireballs" travelling down the lift shafts is totally contradicted by the fact that all the WTC 1 & 2 lift shafts were divided into three separate stages. People going to the 88th the floor MUST get out of the first lift when it reached the top of it's shaft, then they MUST get into a difference lift at the beginning of the next shaft.
There were no lift shafts from the 88th floor to the ground/basement level.
dreamdiction 1 week ago
@dreamdiction Your Tanzanian disinfo conspiracy crap about separatated elevator shafts is contradicted by the fact that while the elevators were ran in three segments, the actual SHAFTS ran the length of the buildings as you could have easily found out. In addition, each tower had a freight elevator that ran the full length of the towers and had 2 elevators that ran from the lobby to the top - that is, to the restaurant in WTC 1 and the observation deck in WTC 2.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@dreamdiction (cont'd) Just to be clear, the elevator shafts were divided by pans into separate segments. It's not the elevator routes that are important here. It's the shafts.
BTW, witnesses at the sites of the blown out elevators reported that there was a strong smell of kerosene at those sites. What do you suppose would cause that smell?
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@PoetryHound The WTC towers were 1140ft tall. The upper limit for lift shafts is 400ft because of "cable weight" and "cable stretch". There were NO LIFT SHAFTS from the 88th floor to the Ground. None.
The lies of Israelis on YouTube have done more than anything to convince an ever increasing number of people that Israel attacked America on 9/11. Israel wants the US to attack Iran but America will not fight any more of Israel’s wars.
/watch?v=i3mbuhhwotc
/watch?v=EU4Im5U7wyw
dreamdiction 1 week ago
@dreamdiction You're still wrong. If lift shafts can't gomore than 400 feet, then how were people able to ride elevators from the lobby up to Windows on the World?
You Tanzanians love to lie about this shit. I don't give a shit about your anti-Israel blah blah propaganda. You got the elevator shaft info dead wrong.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@PoetryHound For over 3 years on Youtube you have been posting Israeli 9/11 lies every hour of every day except Shabbat. The people who pay you as an Israeli Trainee Diplomat, tell you that if you work hard they will support your application to join MOSSAD. Your handlers are lying and they think its funny that you swallowed their bait because they’ll keep you as a low-grade typist forever. Why don’t you get a proper job & stop wasting money on those Russian prostitutes in Tel Aviv.
dreamdiction 1 week ago
@dreamdiction You're a paranoid Tanzanian nutjob. You got the elevator shaft thing dead wrong and now you're just acting like a sore loser. Admit your mistake and move on. Get some meds.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@dreamdiction BTW, you Tanzanian stooge and spy, if you still think you're right about the elevator shaft nonsense, then all you have to do is answer these 2 simple questions:
1. If 400 feet is the limit, how were people able to ride an elevator from the lobby straight to Windows on the World at the top?
2. Witnesses who observed the blown out elevators said there was a strong smell of kerosene at the scene. What would cause that smell?
PoetryHound 1 week ago
@PoetryHound Firemen said, "the lobby looked like a bomb had exploded in the lobby". There is no lift from the lobby to the 88th floor.
Even if only one part of the 9/11 story is a lie, then the whole 9/11 story is a lie.
WTC 7 was controlled demolition and the three dancing Israelis admitted on Israeli TV that they were MOSSAD agents who were in New York to "record the event".
Foreknowledge equals complicity therefore Israel attacked America on 9/11.
/watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg
dreamdiction 1 week ago
@dreamdiction "There is no lift from the lobby to the 88th floor."
There were elevators from the lobby to the top of the building.
I might have known you'd drag the asinine Israel-did-it assertion into this. Lots of people were there recording the event, dumb dumb. They never indicated they knew about 9/11 in advance. This is just sheer stupidity on your part.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dreamdiction "There were no lift shafts from the 88th floor to the ground/basement level."
That's false.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
Yo bro, you ain't even old enough to know you don't know anything. Building 7
Th3BlackPig 1 week ago
BULL SHIT - WTF DO YOU KNOW OPEN YOUR FKN EYES TO THE WORLD YOU MORON
PHONEYPOLITICS 1 week ago
IF TWO OR MORE PEOPLE CONSPIRE TO DO SOMETHING. BY DEFINITION, IT IS A CONSPIRACY. LET THE ADULTS TALK NOW.
peyotecactus 1 week ago
Another IGNORANT MEDIA FED PIG, WHO WONT DO THE RESEARCH AND BELIEVES EVERYTHING HE SEES ON TV AND WHAT THE GOVERMENT CONTROLLED MEDIA TEACHES HIM.... DISREGARD THIS FOOL!!!!
jonescool1fly 1 week ago
@jonescool1fly "Another IGNORANT MEDIA FED PIG, WHO WONT DO THE RESEARCH"
Research? Sorry, but watching Joe Blow's unaccountable, piece-of-shit YT video is not research.
So if you think the media is all government-controlled, then what are YOUR credible and reliable sources of news and information? I'll bet you can't name one specific source.
PoetryHound 1 week ago
Have respect for the victims and the families? The family steering committee wants an new independent investigation. Get off YouTube now please.
peyotecactus 4 weeks ago
SHOW SOME RESPECT AND HELP THE FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS GET THIER ANSWERS
rycan84 1 month ago
watch "911 Press For Truth" and then tell us what you think.
Thumbs up if you watched it.
There is ONE fact that is true for sure.
OUR LEADERS ARE LIEING
rycan84 1 month ago
You would say it wasnt a consiracy... lol you look like ur a muslim no wonder. Go back to the middle east. America isnt a melting pot for your kind anymore. Also how old where you when 9/11 happend? 10? you dont know you werent there. Educate yourslef before you post stupid videos on youtube, you have NO facts! We are not the ones disrespeceting the victims and their families, you are by posting your ridiculous uneducated video on youtube. Please learn facts before running your mouth dumbass!
Ashhllee19 2 months ago
What about molten metal found under wtc 1,2 and 7? Did you see a plane actually hitting the pentagon? No? They just released 5 FRAMES!! Why? Did you see the wreckage of the plane at Shanksville? No? It was just a hole in the ground with pieces of metal in it! And to say "Why would they kill 3000 ppl" Well i'll just say ww1- sinking of the lusitania! ww2- pearl harbour! vietnam- gulf of tonkin! Do some research!!! Or go back to sleep your goverment is in control!
swiveljac 2 months ago
two words..... thermite residue.....,. Explain that.
XhalfasoulX 2 months ago
What about witnesses who saw the basement explosions? What about mysterious deaths of some of the witnesses?
MetaIhead89 3 months ago
Yes it was.
lethalweapon129 3 months ago
Independent Scientists found evidence of a high tech explosive incendiary called nanothermite in the WTC Dust. The Government scientists refused to follow standard protocol and test for the presence of explosives of any kind.
Until the Government performs a real investigation which looks into these things, then the controlled demolition conspiracy theory will never really be "Debunked"...
For a list of people and companies with suspicious connections to nanothermite: watch?v=c3jnFtSElH4
DavidAtleePhilips 4 months ago
@DavidAtleePhilips "Independent Scientists found evidence of a high tech explosive indendiary... bla bla bla..."
Who are these scientists you talk about? What are there names?
jazzfan5000 4 months ago
@jazzfan5000, This looks to be a blatant reach for an appeal to authority. Science is not conducted by poll or opinion. The names of these scientists is of no significance whatsoever, just like the name NIST or Popular Mechanics means nothing in light of the scientific method. All that matters is whether a particular theory can be verified by reproducible experiments. Currently the fire-induced collapse theory is not supported by experiment, and the Government still hasn't tested for explosives.
DavidAtleePhilips 3 months ago
386 VIEWS
17 DISLIKES. SNM
YOU UGLY FUCK! first of allOsama was a former CIA Agent... You jus proved that there was NTSB demolishen bombs planted by american gov themselves! You illeterate, the building went down straight! if a plane hits it...isnt it supposed to collapse on its side? educate yourself, then make these gay videos.
BTW Muslims didnt do this attack, your american government blinded your citizens, Brainwashed you, shredded important data relating to 9/11?
DAHayat786 4 months ago
In case the "Dancing Israelis" did not convince you we, at a MINIMUM, had advance notice, answer this.
1:45 How hard would it be to REVERSE the sequence of the "bottom up" detonation?
(Recall 'they' were not interested in totally minimizing damage.)
If you want to not fall prey to this again learn "The Trivium".
UnoRaza 4 months ago
Yeah I know, I'm getting sick of seeing nothing but conspiracy theories on Youtube. Especially those dealing with 9/11. I can't go to any 9/11 related video without it being something with a conspiracy theory bent.
WeatherMondacicci 4 months ago
So Chaney with the stand down of protecting the targets is a coincidence.
Bush lying about seeing the first plane in a school coincidence.
Rumsfeld with the trillion dollar dept quote the day before coincidence.
Attacking a country who would have helped their brothers in race having nothing to do with 9/11 coincidence.
B-7 brought down by military grade explosives coincidence.
Pent, not showing a plane coincidence.
No plane seen anywhere in Pen, a coincidence.
Please.
Snowman374th 4 months ago
dont listen to the assholes commenting Man, 1500 engineers? and architects. Can you site your sources, and can your sources name names. I can throw out a number right now.
95% of engineers and fire fighting specialists say that this was not a controlled demolition. Is that true? I dunno But Im spewing it out like you assholes.
FromDreamz2Reality - Keep up the good work we need less retards making videos and more people like you making em.
dizimz 5 months ago
if you want to know the Truth keep doing research Youtube search->"Alex Jones 9/11"
dobt be a sheep fool
musicnewnow2011 5 months ago
I'm not sure about whether or not the mainstream conspiracy is valid; that there were demolitions and that the government was directly related to the attacks. What's more likely is that either some branch of gov. or black ops, under the guidance of a few powerful globalist, aided the terrorist in the attacks. No logical human can take the official story at face value. Fact.
Raelsatu 5 months ago
You have no fucking idea what it means to have respect for victims and their families. You think if a child is killed in a car crash, that the police are just going to go up to the parents and say, "Sorry, your child has died", without ANY fucking explanation?
NO, you tell them the. fucking. truth. That isn't an insult to the ones who died, nor to the families.
Lionimia 5 months ago
just little boy with a webcam and his big thoughts..
ELseizure 5 months ago
So you're an expert on pantomiming controlled demolitions with your hands...wow. How much actual exploration of facts have you done to reach your conclusions? Have you seen WTC building 7 implode?
If you want to listen to some extreme folks claim some crazy shit, go ahead. If you want to be a big boy and partake in the real discussion, then do some serious researching on your own. Until then, you're just joining one side of the fray of ranters and you sound pretty dumb.
adelsmana 5 months ago 7
@adelsmana actually he has some common sense. Have you ever herd a contolled demo? There are dozens of loud explosions needed to bring even a small building down. Experts in demolition will say the exact same thing as well.
pitt15220 4 months ago
@adelsmana You people are nuts. Alex Jones isn't research. The kid is right conspiracy nuts like you are nuts. Here's something to think about. There's alllll these theories on the planes. Let's say the government really planted demolitions to bring the towers down. If you recall a truckload of explosives by Al Qaeda was detonated in the basement of the towers to try and bring them down: They Failed. IF the government wanted to make this into an inside job
longhairsRcool 4 weeks ago
@longhairsRcool PART 3: Hmmm...we could have gone to war without all this excess by JUST planting bombs. Why the elaborate excess; fake airplanes, fake phone calls to family members, missiles?
longhairsRcool 4 weeks ago
@adelsmana PART 2: All they would have to do is blow up the towers and say Al Qaeda used explosives again and this time they were successful. Everyone would have believed it to since they tried that in the 90s. If you recall families received phone calls from their families on the plane which I guess were faked by the CIA? Them missels launched into the Pentagon?
longhairsRcool 4 weeks ago
/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98
iNoor440 5 months ago
You say that the WTC wasn't controlled demolitioned ok what about WTC7?
Eye witnesses contradict the official story for the Pentagon hit.
I believe that this was a inside job but am I calling this a conspiracy...... yes I am
because eye witnesses and evidence contradict the official story so if this was criminal act by the US Government the families of 9/11 deserves justice.
I wasn't there so I go by witnesses and evidence.
ConspiracyTVNetwork 5 months ago
Building 7. Your argument is invalid.
FreeTheenkur 5 months ago
The world trade center fell from the impact points. He is right not typical of a controll demolition. The fact ct's stick with this just shows how foolish they are.
Bcm80 5 months ago
If you find it disrespectful to the families, you should know that many of them have been appealing for a proper investigation for quite some time. Will you show some goddamn respect to THOSE people?? And if the fire was hot enough to melt steal, why is there photo and video of a woman standing, alive, waving from the impact crater of one of the planes? Was that super woman? Or did all of the heat escape into the lower parts of the building? And building 7 was hardly damaged enough to collapse.
seanotube85 5 months ago
@seanotube85 your claim is invalid, first of all Melting did not occur, nor was it needed to cause collapse. In fact the official report does not mention nor does it even make the claim that the steel melted, so that is a straw man argument you're making. What happened was the steel was weakened to the point of structural failure, steel loses 50% of it's strength by 1,100 degrees. And about the people in the windows, obviously the fires were not as intense there. Please do some real research.
RBAWilcox 5 months ago
@RBAWilcox Then why was there molten steel when the towers collapsed long after the smoke cleared? And put that together with the fact that the woman could stand where the plane had crashed without burning to death from the heat. So would that mean the steel melted AFTER the towers came down somehow? Or was that some other kind of glowing orange liquid? So the fires were not as intense where the planes actually crashed to begin with? That makes no sense. And buildaing 7 reached 1100 degrees?how?
seanotube85 5 months ago
Comment removed
RBAWilcox 5 months ago
@seanotube85 let me answer your question, first of all Molten steel is never left behind in controlled demolition, and if thermite was used, than the steel would be widely dispersed and would solidify within seconds. And I already stated that obviously the fires were not as intense where the women was standing, how did the steel reach 1,100 degrees, simple, most of the materials in the building were hydrocarbon substances which burn at 1,800 degrees. More than enough to weaken the steel.
RBAWilcox 5 months ago
@RBAWilcox They actually did find steel dust widely dispersed around the towers. And military grade Thermate (not your run of the mill thermite) actually would result in the pools of molten steel that WERE found under the collapsed towers. So that lady standing up there, where temperatures should be at their peak shows the molten steel happened AFTER the collapse. And building 7 was NOT hit by a plane full of jet fuel, so once again, how did it reach 1100 degrees and collapse?
seanotube85 5 months ago
@seanotube85 For the the last time......the fire DID NOT MELT THE STEEL, it weakened it. A fire of around 2000 degree's is hot enough to make steel lose 50% of it's strength......50%. Add 30 stories on top of where
900,000 lbs. of plane sliced through and see how long it takes before the top collapses. Building 7 was hardly damaged? Seriously, you believe that? It was more damaged than you think. Do some research, not just watch "Loose Change" and call that fact.
pitt15220 4 months ago
9/11 truth movement is a money scam
KimmoKuopio 6 months ago
I agree that some things on Youtube about 9/11 being a conspiracy are insanley stupid.
But, there are videos like 9/11 In Plane Sight, and Zeitgheist that are very well put together, and have respectable people talking about why 9/11 was an inside job.
Please, if you can, watch one of those. I would prefer you watch In Plane Sight, as the other shows some things you might not want to see.
Anyhow, I hope you do watch at least one of them, take care man.
JonT2384 6 months ago
@JonT2384 Sure, Zeitgeist is well put together and so is the latest version of Loose Change (American Coup). Most of the referencing for these movies are from other conspiracy websites and are not based in fact or evidence. They just assume and believe. Some of it is just pure stupidity!
jazzfan5000 6 months ago
@jazzfan5000 I'm not sure where you got that from, because usually in the Zeitgeist, when they say something like, there were bombs planted in the buildings. It shows footage from everyone at the time, saying how they heard explosions, bang, bang, bang, bang, it was like a bomb went off, when we got to this floor a bomb went off, and so on.
Almost nowhere in the movie do they just say something without something to back it up. And 9/11 In Plane Sight goes even further.
JonT2384 6 months ago
@JonT2384 Yes, do you see what you said there --- "it was LIKE a bomb went off"... most witnesses said they heard explosions. If you were standing below a high rise structure and all of a sudden a jet slams into it, what do you think you would hear?
jazzfan5000 6 months ago
@jazzfan5000 I have to ask, have you yet to watched the Zeitgeist or 9/11 In Plane Sight?
They both show even NY Firemen agreeing on how it was like a detination, like they were planned to take down a building.
It also shows several people mentioning explosions after the planes hit. How they got to the lobby and an explosion went off, and news reporters saying they thought bombs were planted in the buildings, and so on.
They both reveal a very good amount of information on the subject.
JonT2384 6 months ago
@JonT2384 "They both show even NY Firemen agreeing on how it was like a detination, like they were planned to take down a building."
They said LIKE a controlled demolition, plus if you look at his hands, they were describing a progressive collapse. If I said I was so hungry I can eat a horse, would you lock up your horses? Learn to not take metaphors and similes literally, it just makes you look paranoid, juvenile, and foolish.
theBartone9119 6 months ago
@theBartone9119 What you said is a metaphor, what he said is a simile. If you're going to talk trash, learn how to do it right.
But whatever, did you just look up that clip, or have you watched the whole movie? Even if he meant it as a simile, there's plenty of other firefighters that feel the same way. And the movie reveals much more information then I'd care to get into with you.
And if watch the movie, then you'll see they don't just talking about hearing secondary explosions.
JonT2384 6 months ago
@JonT2384 Explosions being heard during building fires is common, nobody never heard explosIVES (big difference). Examples of building fires with explosions heard:
Explosions as Firefighters Tackle Fire at Falmouth Docks:
"Jamie Clark, who was staying about 60m (200ft) from the scene of the fire, said he was woken up by explosions."
Firefighters battle three-alarm fire involving explosions
"As more firefighters responded to the fire, more callers reported hearing explosions"
Just a few.......
theBartone9119 6 months ago
Ok, jazzfan500, I am 58. I will debate you ANY DAY day on 911. This 'Kid' is obviously ignorant (that just means he does not know the facts)! NO, the 'planes' were NOT holograms, but the videos were NOT real! This is provable from the OFFICIAL videos! 100's of other facts prove 911 was and inside job! Have YOU really looked into it? I think not! IF you want to debate me, I will give you my #.
I actually can be civil, and will LISTEN to what YOU tell me! I suspect you will not! Good day!
ratoig 7 months ago
3 years after 9/11, 40% of Americans either believed 9/11 was an inside job, or the government had knowledge of the up coming attacks. 10 years after 9/11, roughly 5% of Americans believe this. Bravo to the people who realized their theory wasn't worth the shit in a cow field. For the other 5%.....Move out of moms basement, get a job, and get a fucking life!
Ryan198416 7 months ago
@Ryan198416 ur paranoid.. and btw im only 15!!!
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
@FromDreamz2Reality Im not a 9/11 truther. I was making a statement about how the truth movement has died since it's peak 3 years after the events. It was nothing toward you at all, toward 9/11 Truthtards.
Ryan198416 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FromDreamz2Reality Paranoid? did you even READ his comment?
izaiahisback 3 months ago
@FromDreamz2Reality lmao 15 so u were 5 when it happend? bahahahaha stop running ur mouth about it 10 years later.
Ashhllee19 2 months ago
@Ryan198416 Over 1500 engineers and architects stated that Building 7 was a controlled demolition. It was an inside job, and the people deserve to know the truth!
LaughsWontHurt 5 months ago 3
@LaughsWontHurt Wrong, 1500 engineers and architects want a new investigation. Building 7 was severly damaged by the collapse of the north tower and hours before the building fell, the area was evacuated for fear it would fall. It's really not worth explaining things to you people. You want answers, you are given answers, and you chose not to believe the answers.....so continue to live in your paranoid world while the rest of us move on.
Ryan198416 5 months ago
@Ryan198416 Building 7 was not severely damaged by the collapse of the north tower. The only damage building 7 sustained was some office fires and broken windows. That is not severe damage. And that is not how a building collapses when 1 pillar fails.
LaughsWontHurt 5 months ago
@LaughsWontHurt Haha, no, building seven was not damaged at all..........
Ryan198416 5 months ago
@Ryan198416 haha, half a fucking skyscraper fell on it
SKATEOUTTACOMPTON 5 months ago
@SKATEOUTTACOMPTON I know...it was sarcasm to the paranoia being spread by @laughswonthurt
Ryan198416 5 months ago
@Ryan198416 oh, sorry
SKATEOUTTACOMPTON 5 months ago
@LaughsWontHurt Just as many will say the complete flip to that, that it wasn't a contolled demolition, and it wasn't an inside job.
pitt15220 4 months ago
You were 5 when it happened, so you have lived in a 911 world pretty much your entire life. I'd like to know - when did become aware of 911, and then when did you become aware that there were people who don't believe the official story? When you first heard that, where you angry and offended? Does it shake you to your core that some people don't believe the official story? (I'm one of the people who doesn't believe the OCT, tho not hologram planes) -- Just interested.
7Hook 7 months ago
@7Hook I first came aware of 9/11 when I was around idk 9 or 10. When the 5th year of the anniversary took place.. I remember I was with my grandma when they said "The fifth anniversary of 9/11" I turned to my grandpa and said "Grandma was 9/11 when our troops went to more ?" She then told me what 9/11 was and what happened on that day. I later became fascinated with what happened. So in the coming years I learned more and more what I happened on that day. A few years back (continued).....
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
@FromDreamz2Reality I actually considered it to be a conspiracy. But then recently I did enough research and common sense to determine it wasn't a conspiracy. I really think people are just paranoid when it comes to it being a conspiracy and just aren't satisfied with the actual story, so they take these wacky conspiracy theories and try to rationalize them. It's a great thrill, to think our own government did 9/11, but people need to come back to reality and face the fact bad people exist.
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
war*
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
had*
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
Can you explain to me why anyone should accept that 9/11 evidence was disposed of & we were presented with computer simulations instead of scientific analysis? Can you explain why anyone should accept the fact that the gov. & its agencies lied to the 9/11 Commission & the commissioners chose not to use the power of subpoena & pursue the liars? Let's see if you've got the minerals to face the world around you.
odetoinsolence 7 months ago
@odetoinsolence "we were presented with compute simulations instead of scientific analysis"
I don't know if you realize what is wrong with this statement. However I will give you as much time as you need to figure it out! Good luck!
jazzfan5000 7 months ago
@jazzfan5000
You forgot the "R" at the end of COMPUTER. Well. That was easy. Anything else?
odetoinsolence 7 months ago
@odetoinsolence Bzzzz! Maybe you can try again??????
And yes, I did forget the "R" -- it's called a typo. Sue me!
jazzfan5000 6 months ago
@jazzfan5000
The missing "R" is all that's ever going to be wrong with that statement. I'm done here. I've posted my question & neither you or the kid has been able to respond to it. You're wasting your time.
odetoinsolence 6 months ago
@odetoinsolence isn't a computer simulation scientific analysis?
pitt15220 4 months ago
@pitt15220
No. Application of the SCIENTIFIC METHOD is the only thing applicable in an investigation. This means physical testing. If you expect people to come around to your way of thinking then you need to be able to explain why they should accept the gov. officers & experts deviation from standard investigative procedure. You need to be able to explain why they should accept that the Commission was lied to.
odetoinsolence 4 months ago
You, son, are ABSOLUTELY BIZARRE and VERY Annoying! I will not call you stupid, just VERY Ignorant! How much research have you done! You say we should be 'locked up' for THINKING stuff !!! You sir, are SICK and what's WRONG with America (The land that I love). Ok , NOW I have watched your whole video, and ok, NOW, I say you ARE stupid! You are STILL 5 years old! SHOVE you!! Get a life you stupid JERK!
ratoig 7 months ago
@ratoig I'm the bizarre one ? Your the one who believes that the planes on 9/11 were holograms... O.o
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
@ratoig Funny how YOU (who is most likely of adult age) cannot stand that a KID, a teenager, has more sense than you do!
jazzfan5000 7 months ago
@ratoig Are you just mad because someone that was only 5 at the time this happened, has more common sense than you do. From the post you left it sounds like you are the kid here. Shove you? calling him a stupid jerk? sounds like my 9 yr old nephew....
pitt15220 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fucking hate kids
jdgir218 7 months ago
Nah dude it was a conspiracy. look at the facts. your reasons are stupid. im sorry.
DarkWhabbit 7 months ago
Why were there live hijacking simutlations being ran at the same time? Why were the fighters from NATO in northern canada and alaska at the same time? Why did Bush just sit in that school reading to children when the first plane struck? What person in there right mind would just sit there? Even with it just being a terrible accident at the time the president can't just sit there.
jdgir218 7 months ago
Dude some theorys are crazy I know like no one died but don't just watch these youtube videos check the facts flight 93 is still being used 9 of the terrorists are still alive or were after 9/11 not even half of the people in nyc believe it was a terrorist attack. Dissention is the greatest act of a patriot don't think wanting answers is disrespectful think of it as a way to honor the lives lost.
jdgir218 7 months ago
@jdgir218 Where do you get these bullshit "facts" show me where flight 93 is being flown? Prove to me the hijackers are alive. Dont just tell me.....PROVE IT, show me proof?
pitt15220 4 months ago
Have you ever noticed it starts right above the crash on the north tower?
jdgir218 7 months ago
what was your age for 911 . ??
papa10211961 7 months ago
@papa10211961 I was 5 years old when 9/11 happened.
FromDreamz2Reality 7 months ago
@FromDreamz2Reality : I was 39 .
papa10211961 7 months ago