Anal se and top and bottom roles are rooted in homophobia and an inferiority complex about heterosexuality. We are taught that sex is through sexual intercourse between a man and a woman, and gay culture followed suit. It is time that homosexuality find its own identity. It's time to stop using the anus as a vagina.
I apologize. I was ignorant of your grandfather's past condition and I'm really, really sorry that my comment happened to tread on that. I've lost three of my grandparents to cancers - I know what it feels like. And calling you an idiot was rude of me, so I'm sorry about that too.
That said, my point still stands. There's pleasure gained through contact with the prostate through a mans rectum. That's human anatomy. Your own personal grudge aside, you can't simply deny that.
Pulling me up on my spelling and calling anal sex 'disgusting' isn't disguising the fact you didn't actually counter anything I said. Also, I consider anal sex to be just as disgusting as the fact a man puts his penis in a woman's vagina - a place that bleeds once a month. Or that a man uses his penis at all, considering he urinates out of the same hole his semen is released.
In other words, I really don't find it that disgusting. If you do, that's your own personal opinion.
Okay, fine. The tail end of the 60's and the beginning of the 70's was indeed a sexual revolution - the first time people could really explore their sexuality. So in a way, you're right. People began acting on their natural sexual attraction more, and men were more open about their same-sex tendencies after being stifled for so many years. This is still related to a lack of information, not just because there was lots of sex though...
I apologize. I should have rechecked my facts before making this post - my school obviously mixed up their statistics. After reading your comment I did some research and found that 75% of people living with aids received this through heterosexual sex, not 95. But, in reply to the rest of your comment: The gay community being considered a high risk group is stigmatizing for the sake of justifying someone's homophobia. Everyone has to worry about STIs, not just gays.
Also, comparing anal sex with bestiality is crude and incredibly offensive.
Anal sex can be done safely and cleanly. It's called preparation, contraceptives and healthy bowls. And how would you know anal sex isn't pleasurable if you haven't done it, as you so clearly insinuated in your ridiculous bestiality comment? If you're going to argue something, at least do it accurately. This is just embarrassing.
You're clearly a complete idiot. First: the prostate is a gland, not an organ, second: do you know how they check for prostate cancer? By sticking a finger up your rectum, because they can feel if it's cancerous or not. The prostate is pressed right up against the rectum - close enough that a doctor can tell if its unhealthy simply by touching. That is basic anatomy, and the fact that you replied with that shows that you're both an idiot and that you didn't do your research.
Um, actually, yes they are. The main form of the spreading of AIDS is heterosexual sex - all over the world. Hetero sex spreads 95 - 99% of all STIs, AIDS included. The reason gays from the 60's, 70's and 80's got AIDS so much was because of a lack of education. The second homosexuality was actually talked about it became much safer and healthier.
If you're going to argue a point, at least research it. You just sound stupid now.
ha this is funny first you dont have the traditional way of doing things (seeing as theres a dick in the way lol) and now that anal sex is starting to get more known and its dangerous effects with it "anal sex doesn't equal homosexuality" so now you dont have anal either? you guys are starting to run out of options. whats left now for you people jerk and head? pathetic fucking sex life guys. sounds to me like a pathetic attempt at squashing a very crushing argument against homesexuality
The act of anal sex even if it is between two heterosexual couples, is still an act of sodomy which is an abomination before the Most High. The Most High clearly did not design the rectum for entry in any way shape or form. The rectum is design to put waste & garbage out from the human body, that's it. Hope you all have some understanding.
@wimscheers I do not think heterosexual couples practice anal sex do so as a rule. Instead it seems that the gay culture, the sex revolves around the anal intercourse with top and bottom divisions, which are nothing more than an equivalent to male and female sexes
"the gay culture, the sex revolves around the anal" Well, I might be talking out of my ass here, but I've heard the figure that only 40 % of gays engage in anal sex. Second, it IS a male erogenous zone. The question becomes, why don’t hetro’s stick more things up there ass? And copying male/female sex? I hope they have more to copy then penetration.
@wimscheers The anus is the erogenous zone, but in the rectum no nerve endings, there is no pleasure nor sense of touch. The pleasure is only produced abroad. The penetration is unnecessary (and dangerous). The anus is not designed for entry, but only as an output..
"but in the rectum no nerve endings, there is no pleasure nor sense of touch."
Although I lack personal experience in this area, I know some gay sources who beg to differ. And some medical ones at that too. But I have a feeling we’re just arguing next to each other, the main question being; Do you mind people sticking stuff up there ass? Or is it just a personal standpoint?
@wimscheers I think gays are strongly determined to have anal sex because this is what is expected of them, because he identifies homosexuality with anal sex because their partners are the demand and so forth. Anal sex should be optional rather than feel like a duty. And, of course, be informed that he has more drawbacks than advantages. and that other forms of sex more pleasurable.
"this is what is expected of them" "Anal sex should be optional rather than feel like a duty." Well, I know a few gay guys, and to be frank, they don't seem to see it as a duty. Then again, why would a fringe group in society, shunned and labeled by many, suddenly give a crap about expectations? If they think they should take it up the butt, fine. If they like it, more power to them. If they don’t, grow a pair and tell your partner where to stick it.
If the rectum has 'no pleasure nor sense of touch', then what is the prostate? The prostate in a man's rectum is a source of pleasure when touched, like that of the clitoris. If gay guys didn't get pleasure from anal sex (not just giving it, but also taking it) they simply wouldn't do it. Anal sex, when performed safely and cleanly, does give physical pleasure to both participants. And this isn't even touching on the issue that making love is about the emotional, not the physical.
@Klasado If being anally penetrated was so pleasant, there would be top and bottom roles, and all men, regardless of their sexual orientation or anything else, would find it so.
There are heterosexual couples that engage in anal sex, and I don't just mean the man giving it to the woman. Obviously there would be people who simply don't enjoy such an act, just like there is for any matter of sexual act - e.g. some women don't like oral - it's just a matter of preference. The reason more men don't try anal is because 1) there is a stigma to anal sex, and 2) vaginal penetration doesn't have this stigma, and a hetero couple would actually have this option.
I would like to expand on the points I made before. 1) The Stigma. This is something you are advocating right now in our discussion; this is a fear of the different. If anal sex is performed safely - as all forms of sex should be, for the sake of STIs and unplanned pregnancies - it really isn't that terrifying. A man pees out of his penis. A woman bleeds from her vagina every month. This is expelling waste from the body. Having your usual hetero sex isn't that different from anal.
2) If you have a form of sex that has never been looked down on, doesn't always require preparation (like anal does) and is actually possible with your partner, obviously you're going to go with that option. Also - there are men in straight couples that prefer their female counterparts having control over the situation. This is more or less what the 'top' and 'bottom' roles are - who is leading and who is following, like in a dance. Not every straight man is the 'top' in a couple.
You, just like a magician, attempt to divert the minds of ignorant men from obvious truths self evident (all anal sex is wicked = a sin) into a controversy, so that all truth is buried and your personal glory is magnified in other mends minds which gives satisfaction to the depths of your depraved soul.
"You, just like a magician, attempt to divert the minds of ignorant men from obvious truths self evident" Oh please religious folk, give me more irony.
Romans 1.21 For when they had come to know God, they did not give Him glory as God nor render Him thanks, but they became absorbed in useless discussions, and their senseless minds were darkened.
22 While boasting of their wisdom they became utter fools,
23 and, instead of worshipping the imperishable God, they worshipped images resembling perishable man or resembling birds or beasts or reptiles.
24 For this reason, in accordance with their own depraved cravings, God gave them up to uncleanness, allowing them to dishonour their bodies among themselves with impurity.
25 For they had bartered the reality of God for what is unreal, and had offered divine honours and religious service to created things, rather than to the Creator--He who is for ever blessed. Amen.
26 This then is the reason why God gave them up to vile passions.
27 in just the same way--neglecting that for which nature intends women--burned with passion towards one another, men practising shameful vice with men, and receiving in their own selves the reward which necessarily followed their misconduct.
28 And just as they had refused to continue to have a full knowledge of God, so it was to utterly worthless minds that God gave them up, for them to do things which should not be done.
29 Their hearts overflowed with all sorts of dishonesty, mischief, greed, malice. They were full of envy and murder, and were quarrelsome, crafty, and spiteful.
30 They were secret backbiters, open slanderers; hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful; inventors of new forms of sin, disobedient to parents, destitute of common sense,
31 faithless to their promises, without natural affection, without human pity.
32 In short, though knowing full well the sentence which God pronounces against actions such as theirs, as things which deserve death, they not only practise them, but even encourage and applaud others who do them.
Thankyou for this, I'm sick of trying to explain that being a homosexual man doesn't mean you automatically engage in anal sex. Common sense is that you accept that homosexuality is a fact of life even though you might not understand it.
This Video makes so much sense. Thank you for posting!
Hypocrites who condemn homosexuals do actually have analsex themselfs as it is more common amongst heterosexuals. Oh, and I have never heard of anyone cathing AIDS, Syphilis and other STD's from FROT. Not even with some degree of promiscuoty on.
And by the way, Homosexual people has more posibilities to get Aids than straight people, I know that there's no safe sex, but comparing "straight sex" with "gay sex", gay go worst.
The biggest spread of AIDS in these modern times is heterosexual sex. Heterosex makes 95 - 99% of all STIs spread, AIDS included.
It's not a matter of hetero or gay, it's a matter of vaginal or anal - heterosexual couples do anal sex as well. And with vaginal or anal sex, it's not a matter of what you're doing - it's a matter of how safe you are. Anyone can catch AIDS. That's why contraceptives exist.
News Flash: NOT ALL HOMOSEXUAL MEN HAVE AIDS FROM ANAL SEX! YOU CAN'T JUST GET IT FROM OUT OF NOWHERE AND THEN SPREAD IT! Its just like asking a person for a million dollars, if they don't have it then neither will YOU! :-) But always remember, any sex, gay, lez, or hetero, always always ALWAYS do it safe.
Ok, when I argue against homosexuality and anal sex I'm also arguing against heterosexual people who perform this. After all for gay people or straight people the damage is the same. So I think there's no problem to argue against the anal sex performed in homosexual acts.
Please don't be a liar. If you have an idea of what anal sex really do to the body you won't be use that phrase of yours "it can be beneficial to both individuals". And it is also dangerous to the person who penetrates, specially if no condom is used and even if a condom is used the person who is penetrated also gets damage. And if I really have not a reason to watch this video surely I wouldn't making any comments. I would not waste my time
Sounds like you need to do a little research on what you preach. A simple google search on "How to Have Anal Sex" will vacate your reservations/disdain.
I have more than a simple "google" research on what anal sex is. And if you are reffering to the secure anal sex using condoms, let me tell, you're wrong. It protecs the one who penetrates, but the person being penetred is taking a lot of damage to the body. So allow me to say again, you're the one that doesn't know nothing about the matter.
Didn't I told you already that it seems you don't know nothing about the matter?. You're the one who needs to do a research on what anal sex is. So stop bothering.
I hold a minor in Physical Anatomy with a concentration on human sexuality. I've written three papers on Anal sexuality and perused hundreds of articles. While anal fissures and ruptures are POSSIBLE, their likelyhoods are near minimal (around 1%) when a) performed correctly (lubrication, condom placement, clitoral (penile) stimulation, etc...) and b) mutual involvement. Beating a dead horse with your myopic, politically motivated ideals only reveals you for the snub-nosed fool that you are.
I would be pleased for you to send me at least one of the things you have written. And nevertheless you use a condom and lubrication the person who is penetrated has more than 1 percent to be affected. Again I don't believe you. And Is not just the complications in the rectus and anus, it is the consequence on the whole body. By the way I work for myself, I don't have political ideals motivated by anyone, not as the "political" gay activist have, and It's not necessary to call me fool. Respect.
anal sex easily leads to the tearing of the memebrane in the rectum, leading to bacteria getting into broken blood vessels, and if that person is bi and then has that std and has sex with a straight woman, then that straight woman has sex with a straight guy thats where it starts. Thats whats wrong with it. Its not your buisiness anymore, then its everyones. I'm celibite.
i was a skeptic on whether this video was good or not, clearly it is, nothing biggoted, I praise your effort here. (at least just this video).
Zeldagigafan90210 1 month ago
Anal se and top and bottom roles are rooted in homophobia and an inferiority complex about heterosexuality. We are taught that sex is through sexual intercourse between a man and a woman, and gay culture followed suit. It is time that homosexuality find its own identity. It's time to stop using the anus as a vagina.
forsputnick 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
I apologize. I was ignorant of your grandfather's past condition and I'm really, really sorry that my comment happened to tread on that. I've lost three of my grandparents to cancers - I know what it feels like. And calling you an idiot was rude of me, so I'm sorry about that too.
That said, my point still stands. There's pleasure gained through contact with the prostate through a mans rectum. That's human anatomy. Your own personal grudge aside, you can't simply deny that.
Klasado 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
Pulling me up on my spelling and calling anal sex 'disgusting' isn't disguising the fact you didn't actually counter anything I said. Also, I consider anal sex to be just as disgusting as the fact a man puts his penis in a woman's vagina - a place that bleeds once a month. Or that a man uses his penis at all, considering he urinates out of the same hole his semen is released.
In other words, I really don't find it that disgusting. If you do, that's your own personal opinion.
Klasado 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
"No it was because of rampant anal sex. Period."
Okay, fine. The tail end of the 60's and the beginning of the 70's was indeed a sexual revolution - the first time people could really explore their sexuality. So in a way, you're right. People began acting on their natural sexual attraction more, and men were more open about their same-sex tendencies after being stifled for so many years. This is still related to a lack of information, not just because there was lots of sex though...
Klasado 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
I apologize. I should have rechecked my facts before making this post - my school obviously mixed up their statistics. After reading your comment I did some research and found that 75% of people living with aids received this through heterosexual sex, not 95. But, in reply to the rest of your comment: The gay community being considered a high risk group is stigmatizing for the sake of justifying someone's homophobia. Everyone has to worry about STIs, not just gays.
Klasado 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
Also, comparing anal sex with bestiality is crude and incredibly offensive.
Anal sex can be done safely and cleanly. It's called preparation, contraceptives and healthy bowls. And how would you know anal sex isn't pleasurable if you haven't done it, as you so clearly insinuated in your ridiculous bestiality comment? If you're going to argue something, at least do it accurately. This is just embarrassing.
Klasado 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
You're clearly a complete idiot. First: the prostate is a gland, not an organ, second: do you know how they check for prostate cancer? By sticking a finger up your rectum, because they can feel if it's cancerous or not. The prostate is pressed right up against the rectum - close enough that a doctor can tell if its unhealthy simply by touching. That is basic anatomy, and the fact that you replied with that shows that you're both an idiot and that you didn't do your research.
Klasado 3 months ago
@Zer0cropped
Um, actually, yes they are. The main form of the spreading of AIDS is heterosexual sex - all over the world. Hetero sex spreads 95 - 99% of all STIs, AIDS included. The reason gays from the 60's, 70's and 80's got AIDS so much was because of a lack of education. The second homosexuality was actually talked about it became much safer and healthier.
If you're going to argue a point, at least research it. You just sound stupid now.
Klasado 3 months ago
ha this is funny first you dont have the traditional way of doing things (seeing as theres a dick in the way lol) and now that anal sex is starting to get more known and its dangerous effects with it "anal sex doesn't equal homosexuality" so now you dont have anal either? you guys are starting to run out of options. whats left now for you people jerk and head? pathetic fucking sex life guys. sounds to me like a pathetic attempt at squashing a very crushing argument against homesexuality
Kazo1911 10 months ago
I stopped watching after :05 and realized there is no argument here.
jshjamaarify 1 year ago
Good song! ^_^ *Nods head with the beat.*
Kevstar19 1 year ago
The act of anal sex even if it is between two heterosexual couples, is still an act of sodomy which is an abomination before the Most High. The Most High clearly did not design the rectum for entry in any way shape or form. The rectum is design to put waste & garbage out from the human body, that's it. Hope you all have some understanding.
Shalom
humblegoldvybez 1 year ago
@humblegoldvybez Hahaha Can't tell either way, so I'll just call Poe's Law on you.
wimscheers 1 year ago
not all gays have anal sex. i have a gay friend who's actualy disgusted by the idea of anal sex.
aglewi41 2 years ago
Your friend is a G0y like me. The g0ys (spelled with a zero) reject anal sex.
forsputnick 1 year ago
@forsputnick As a pitcher or a reciever?
wimscheers 1 year ago
@wimscheers The g0ys practice frot sex and frottage. We reject anal sex and top / bottom roles. It is a crude copy of the heterosexual couple.
forsputnick 1 year ago
@forsputnick
"It is a crude copy of the heterosexual couple." And what about couples who engage in anal sex?
wimscheers 1 year ago
@wimscheers I do not think heterosexual couples practice anal sex do so as a rule. Instead it seems that the gay culture, the sex revolves around the anal intercourse with top and bottom divisions, which are nothing more than an equivalent to male and female sexes
forsputnick 1 year ago
@forsputnick
"the gay culture, the sex revolves around the anal" Well, I might be talking out of my ass here, but I've heard the figure that only 40 % of gays engage in anal sex. Second, it IS a male erogenous zone. The question becomes, why don’t hetro’s stick more things up there ass? And copying male/female sex? I hope they have more to copy then penetration.
wimscheers 1 year ago
@wimscheers The anus is the erogenous zone, but in the rectum no nerve endings, there is no pleasure nor sense of touch. The pleasure is only produced abroad. The penetration is unnecessary (and dangerous). The anus is not designed for entry, but only as an output..
forsputnick 1 year ago
@forsputnick
"but in the rectum no nerve endings, there is no pleasure nor sense of touch."
Although I lack personal experience in this area, I know some gay sources who beg to differ. And some medical ones at that too. But I have a feeling we’re just arguing next to each other, the main question being; Do you mind people sticking stuff up there ass? Or is it just a personal standpoint?
wimscheers 1 year ago
@wimscheers I think gays are strongly determined to have anal sex because this is what is expected of them, because he identifies homosexuality with anal sex because their partners are the demand and so forth. Anal sex should be optional rather than feel like a duty. And, of course, be informed that he has more drawbacks than advantages. and that other forms of sex more pleasurable.
forsputnick 1 year ago
@forsputnick
"this is what is expected of them" "Anal sex should be optional rather than feel like a duty." Well, I know a few gay guys, and to be frank, they don't seem to see it as a duty. Then again, why would a fringe group in society, shunned and labeled by many, suddenly give a crap about expectations? If they think they should take it up the butt, fine. If they like it, more power to them. If they don’t, grow a pair and tell your partner where to stick it.
wimscheers 1 year ago
@forsputnick
If the rectum has 'no pleasure nor sense of touch', then what is the prostate? The prostate in a man's rectum is a source of pleasure when touched, like that of the clitoris. If gay guys didn't get pleasure from anal sex (not just giving it, but also taking it) they simply wouldn't do it. Anal sex, when performed safely and cleanly, does give physical pleasure to both participants. And this isn't even touching on the issue that making love is about the emotional, not the physical.
Klasado 3 months ago
@Klasado If being anally penetrated was so pleasant, there would be top and bottom roles, and all men, regardless of their sexual orientation or anything else, would find it so.
forsputnick 3 months ago
@forsputnick
There are heterosexual couples that engage in anal sex, and I don't just mean the man giving it to the woman. Obviously there would be people who simply don't enjoy such an act, just like there is for any matter of sexual act - e.g. some women don't like oral - it's just a matter of preference. The reason more men don't try anal is because 1) there is a stigma to anal sex, and 2) vaginal penetration doesn't have this stigma, and a hetero couple would actually have this option.
321Anonymoose 3 months ago
@forsputnick
I would like to expand on the points I made before. 1) The Stigma. This is something you are advocating right now in our discussion; this is a fear of the different. If anal sex is performed safely - as all forms of sex should be, for the sake of STIs and unplanned pregnancies - it really isn't that terrifying. A man pees out of his penis. A woman bleeds from her vagina every month. This is expelling waste from the body. Having your usual hetero sex isn't that different from anal.
321Anonymoose 3 months ago
@forsputnick
2) If you have a form of sex that has never been looked down on, doesn't always require preparation (like anal does) and is actually possible with your partner, obviously you're going to go with that option. Also - there are men in straight couples that prefer their female counterparts having control over the situation. This is more or less what the 'top' and 'bottom' roles are - who is leading and who is following, like in a dance. Not every straight man is the 'top' in a couple.
321Anonymoose 3 months ago
fuck you WMG
DarkTrunksGeorgeSim 2 years ago
You, just like a magician, attempt to divert the minds of ignorant men from obvious truths self evident (all anal sex is wicked = a sin) into a controversy, so that all truth is buried and your personal glory is magnified in other mends minds which gives satisfaction to the depths of your depraved soul.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Cabanas751Dunhill
"You, just like a magician, attempt to divert the minds of ignorant men from obvious truths self evident" Oh please religious folk, give me more irony.
wimscheers 1 year ago
Romans 1.21 For when they had come to know God, they did not give Him glory as God nor render Him thanks, but they became absorbed in useless discussions, and their senseless minds were darkened.
22 While boasting of their wisdom they became utter fools,
23 and, instead of worshipping the imperishable God, they worshipped images resembling perishable man or resembling birds or beasts or reptiles.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
24 For this reason, in accordance with their own depraved cravings, God gave them up to uncleanness, allowing them to dishonour their bodies among themselves with impurity.
25 For they had bartered the reality of God for what is unreal, and had offered divine honours and religious service to created things, rather than to the Creator--He who is for ever blessed. Amen.
26 This then is the reason why God gave them up to vile passions.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
For not only did the women among them exchange the natural use of their bodies for one which is contrary to nature, but the men also,
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
Romans
1
27 in just the same way--neglecting that for which nature intends women--burned with passion towards one another, men practising shameful vice with men, and receiving in their own selves the reward which necessarily followed their misconduct.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
28 And just as they had refused to continue to have a full knowledge of God, so it was to utterly worthless minds that God gave them up, for them to do things which should not be done.
29 Their hearts overflowed with all sorts of dishonesty, mischief, greed, malice. They were full of envy and murder, and were quarrelsome, crafty, and spiteful.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
30 They were secret backbiters, open slanderers; hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful; inventors of new forms of sin, disobedient to parents, destitute of common sense,
31 faithless to their promises, without natural affection, without human pity.
32 In short, though knowing full well the sentence which God pronounces against actions such as theirs, as things which deserve death, they not only practise them, but even encourage and applaud others who do them.
Cabanas751Dunhill 3 years ago
@Cabanas751Dunhill
Romans 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
BiJaneWhite 1 year ago
@BiJaneWhite And LOVE will reject the fags and tell them so
Cabanas751Dunhill 1 year ago
@Cabanas751Dunhill
therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.
You might want to focus on this bit, and maybe read the Bible in context, maybe enough to see its lack of condemnation for homosexuality.
BiJaneWhite 1 year ago
bravo...very well done...thank you for posting this.
rifleguy73 3 years ago
curios bunch those queers packing each others fudge and whatnot.
archeeizm 3 years ago
if anal sex is wrong so is oral, and not all gay men have anal sex
gaylordbazza 3 years ago
I think your sarcasm detector is in need of repair.
urbium 3 years ago
Completely agree
iame02 3 years ago
They are both abominations, and also masturbation, and fornication...
a gay always fornicates
Metania01 3 years ago
Thankyou for this, I'm sick of trying to explain that being a homosexual man doesn't mean you automatically engage in anal sex. Common sense is that you accept that homosexuality is a fact of life even though you might not understand it.
Siddeney 3 years ago 2
Common sense people men should be with women.
xxmonickkkkaxx 3 years ago
You, on the other hand, are a dumbass.
urbium 3 years ago
This Video makes so much sense. Thank you for posting!
Hypocrites who condemn homosexuals do actually have analsex themselfs as it is more common amongst heterosexuals. Oh, and I have never heard of anyone cathing AIDS, Syphilis and other STD's from FROT. Not even with some degree of promiscuoty on.
ShahMashya 3 years ago
And by the way, Homosexual people has more posibilities to get Aids than straight people, I know that there's no safe sex, but comparing "straight sex" with "gay sex", gay go worst.
miglix22 3 years ago
Oh sweet lord, I hope you never have kids.
urbium 3 years ago
@miglix22
bitch what
The biggest spread of AIDS in these modern times is heterosexual sex. Heterosex makes 95 - 99% of all STIs spread, AIDS included.
It's not a matter of hetero or gay, it's a matter of vaginal or anal - heterosexual couples do anal sex as well. And with vaginal or anal sex, it's not a matter of what you're doing - it's a matter of how safe you are. Anyone can catch AIDS. That's why contraceptives exist.
Klasado 3 months ago
News Flash: NOT ALL HOMOSEXUAL MEN HAVE AIDS FROM ANAL SEX! YOU CAN'T JUST GET IT FROM OUT OF NOWHERE AND THEN SPREAD IT! Its just like asking a person for a million dollars, if they don't have it then neither will YOU! :-) But always remember, any sex, gay, lez, or hetero, always always ALWAYS do it safe.
jacko39 3 years ago
Ok, when I argue against homosexuality and anal sex I'm also arguing against heterosexual people who perform this. After all for gay people or straight people the damage is the same. So I think there's no problem to argue against the anal sex performed in homosexual acts.
miglix22 3 years ago
very well said.
jacko39 3 years ago
Why is anal sex so bad? If handled propery and done with care, it can be beneficial to both individuals. Why be bothered by other people's buisness?
urbium 3 years ago
Please don't be a liar. If you have an idea of what anal sex really do to the body you won't be use that phrase of yours "it can be beneficial to both individuals". And it is also dangerous to the person who penetrates, specially if no condom is used and even if a condom is used the person who is penetrated also gets damage. And if I really have not a reason to watch this video surely I wouldn't making any comments. I would not waste my time
watching a video I don't care of. So....
miglix22 3 years ago
Sounds like you need to do a little research on what you preach. A simple google search on "How to Have Anal Sex" will vacate your reservations/disdain.
urbium 3 years ago
I have more than a simple "google" research on what anal sex is. And if you are reffering to the secure anal sex using condoms, let me tell, you're wrong. It protecs the one who penetrates, but the person being penetred is taking a lot of damage to the body. So allow me to say again, you're the one that doesn't know nothing about the matter.
miglix22 3 years ago
And if you know a little bit of anatomy you should what rectum and anus was made for. So again. So proof I'm wrong.
miglix22 3 years ago
Didn't I told you already that it seems you don't know nothing about the matter?. You're the one who needs to do a research on what anal sex is. So stop bothering.
miglix22 3 years ago
I hold a minor in Physical Anatomy with a concentration on human sexuality. I've written three papers on Anal sexuality and perused hundreds of articles. While anal fissures and ruptures are POSSIBLE, their likelyhoods are near minimal (around 1%) when a) performed correctly (lubrication, condom placement, clitoral (penile) stimulation, etc...) and b) mutual involvement. Beating a dead horse with your myopic, politically motivated ideals only reveals you for the snub-nosed fool that you are.
urbium 3 years ago
I would be pleased for you to send me at least one of the things you have written. And nevertheless you use a condom and lubrication the person who is penetrated has more than 1 percent to be affected. Again I don't believe you. And Is not just the complications in the rectus and anus, it is the consequence on the whole body. By the way I work for myself, I don't have political ideals motivated by anyone, not as the "political" gay activist have, and It's not necessary to call me fool. Respect.
miglix22 3 years ago
I'm still waiting at least one of the papers you have on Anal sexuality.
miglix22 3 years ago
smoking kills more than sex, lots talk about banning all smoking, speeding kills lets bann all cars trucks vans and so on
gaylordbazza 3 years ago
well said
gaylordbazza 3 years ago
anal sex easily leads to the tearing of the memebrane in the rectum, leading to bacteria getting into broken blood vessels, and if that person is bi and then has that std and has sex with a straight woman, then that straight woman has sex with a straight guy thats where it starts. Thats whats wrong with it. Its not your buisiness anymore, then its everyones. I'm celibite.
tohidefromourways 2 years ago
this is very important, yes
YumYumsPk 3 years ago