One of the foundations of the massacre myth is based on the book which is called "What War Means", edited by Harold Timperley. But he was an advisor to the Chinese Nationalist government’s Ministry of Information. The section was propaganda section which was established by KMT (Kuomintang, Chiang Kai-shek) in China during the War. Timperley was paid by the propaganda section for writing the book.
The Nanking Massacre must have been fake history from the perspective of the city population, the number of corpse, a fact of Timperley who was paid by the Ministry of Information for editing a propaganda book which is written Japanese atrocity. Moreover, about 35 foreign journalists and diplomats attended the press conferences which were held 300 times between Dec 1, 1937 and Oct 24, 1938. However, Chinese didnt explain so-called the Nanking Massacre facts even once.
From 4:36, Chief Prosecutor Joseph Keenan claims that the government in Beijing was the only government recognized by the international community and was headed by Zhang Zuolin. But I believe that the head of that government at the time of the incident was Chiang Kai-shek. Anybody knows the right answer?
This has been flagged as spam show
One of the foundations of the massacre myth is based on the book which is called "What War Means", edited by Harold Timperley. But he was an advisor to the Chinese Nationalist government’s Ministry of Information. The section was propaganda section which was established by KMT (Kuomintang, Chiang Kai-shek) in China during the War. Timperley was paid by the propaganda section for writing the book.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
Why is that every japanese dialogues are said by chinese???
and why chinese actors act japanese?
kissbutterkiss 1 year ago
@kissbutterkiss The japanese dialogues were spoken in Japanese, but subtitled in chinese
imaginator 1 year ago
quality sucks to the core......
fateofsky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Nanking Massacre must have been fake history from the perspective of the city population, the number of corpse, a fact of Timperley who was paid by the Ministry of Information for editing a propaganda book which is written Japanese atrocity. Moreover, about 35 foreign journalists and diplomats attended the press conferences which were held 300 times between Dec 1, 1937 and Oct 24, 1938. However, Chinese didnt explain so-called the Nanking Massacre facts even once.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
There is but the recording is shit
darthgrahf 2 years ago
AAAAAAAHhhhhhhhhhhhh it 's not english nooooooooooooooooo
dannycreighton 3 years ago
zhang zuolin death was the incident in machuria during 1928...chiang kai shek only came to power for republic of china in 1925 after sun yat sen died
ccp2009 3 years ago
From 4:36, Chief Prosecutor Joseph Keenan claims that the government in Beijing was the only government recognized by the international community and was headed by Zhang Zuolin. But I believe that the head of that government at the time of the incident was Chiang Kai-shek. Anybody knows the right answer?
InglewoodGridah 3 years ago
In fact
In that time period,Chinese central goverment was under the control of Beiyang Warloads,Zhang was the most famous one of them.
Zhang have once been on the cover of TIMES,
the other two chinese leader once be on Times before 1945 were Chiang and Duan Qi-rui(also an Warlord).
zola1231 3 years ago
What are they saying? I cant understeand please translate.
theboliviantrooper 3 years ago
南京事件を正当化させるためか。 そもそも、東京裁判における南京事件は偽証証言による立証ではないか。 証拠が全くない。 全て偽証証言によるものだ。 蒋介石の督戦隊が撤兵を許さず、逃走兵を殺害。 敗残兵が難民区で行った暴虐を日本軍のせいにするな! 卑怯者ども!
bobhope346 4 years ago
LOL and Hiroshima never happened either.
Evilbible 3 years ago
Are you a syphilis patient ? You had better check your brain.
bobhope346 3 years ago
Did you fail english class? oh well, ignorance is bliss. It must be a wonderful world you live in without sarcasm. You VERY smart man
Evilbible 3 years ago
When the word is out it belong to another. You Chinese shold not say about Hiroshima.
bobhope346 3 years ago
中華人民共和国が何故、東京裁判の映画をつくるのだ? 国が成立する前のことだろう。何がいいたいのだ。
bobhope346 4 years ago