Nano technology is a racket.The history of nano technology proves the interface-formula that enables nano technology wasn't known until 2005.They stole it and tried to Strawman it by crediting Erick Drexler as "The Father of Nanotechnology" Then began researching the formula and discovering new nano scale facts that were all patented since 1999.Erick Drexler only had a Strawman no formula. Nanotechnology is UFT is it not?If Einstein couldn't solve his own UFT then who did?They never told anyone
(Read second) The molecular sorter here is a single step in which the molecule either binds to the receptor or it doesn't and it is one step in of a much longer multi step process. Look up "Nanofactory Movie" to see the full process. For more technical details read the book Nanosystems by Drexler who designed this structure and is an authority on the subject.
The rectangle is only a representation of how the wrong molecule would not be able to fit in the shape carriage for a different molecule. If you notice, the spheres are actually going inside of a reverse sphere shape, and the rectangles are too big to go in them. There for they pop out. The rectangles and sphere's would not really be in the system, they are just simple examples. Molecules would be even more complex which would make it actually even more impossible for them to fit.
I hope so. I am left with the question. What happens if a nano-selector gets jammed. Obviously under some conditions this could spell disaster. Maybe the nano selector can be designed in such a way that when it know it is jammed (no rotation possible) it will rotate the other way, and then back again.
Think of it this way, you can not fit a square peg into a round hole. If the positive shape does not match the negative shape, it will not go in, thus will not jam. If you want more details on this design, check out the book Nanosystems by Drexler.
ummm, you may not *perfectly* fit a square peg into a round hole, but you can certainly fit something that will jam the nano-selector. Example, you can certainly feed a fat enough needle into a lock and jam it.
(Read first) If a molecule doesn't fit into a binding site it binds very poorly and comes off right away, (remember that there is not just a shape interaction here, but a chemical interaction as well). There are cases in biology with protein enzymes, in which a molecule will bind tightly to a site and poison the enzyme from working further - these involve multi step reactions in which the poison fits the first step but not the second step.
The turning of the nano-selector may be faster than the time it take the non-fitting molecule to be rejected. Thus I still hold that the nano selector as depicted in the video is prone to jamming unless additional measures are taken.
Part 1: This is an animation that I made in real time so it is functioning in a real time that you are able to view. Atomic scale is different than ours (not real time), and the representations in this nanoscale scale model reside in that atomic scale time. This is a simulation I made with a computer program, not a physical design with an AFM (a physical design is not here yet) - although you can take a look at nature for references.
Part2: The time and mathematical calculations will be factored into the real design. If you are making the point based on this simulation you are not looking at atomic scale time, nor are you looking at the chemical binding interactions, nor are you looking at the entire nanoassembler design. Again, if you want more technical details you can find them in the designers book, Nanosystems by K. Eric Drexler.
This has been flagged as spam show
Nano technology is a racket.The history of nano technology proves the interface-formula that enables nano technology wasn't known until 2005.They stole it and tried to Strawman it by crediting Erick Drexler as "The Father of Nanotechnology" Then began researching the formula and discovering new nano scale facts that were all patented since 1999.Erick Drexler only had a Strawman no formula. Nanotechnology is UFT is it not?If Einstein couldn't solve his own UFT then who did?They never told anyone
princeadeshoga 9 months ago
Feed a fat enough needle into a lock and jam it! XD
Chiiiiiiiiiiiii!
HighestRank 3 years ago
(Read second) The molecular sorter here is a single step in which the molecule either binds to the receptor or it doesn't and it is one step in of a much longer multi step process. Look up "Nanofactory Movie" to see the full process. For more technical details read the book Nanosystems by Drexler who designed this structure and is an authority on the subject.
nanogirl 4 years ago
Looks like this nano-selector could have been easily jammed by one of those rectangular particles. Not a good design, if I may add.
terrafirmaterrafirma 4 years ago
The rectangle is only a representation of how the wrong molecule would not be able to fit in the shape carriage for a different molecule. If you notice, the spheres are actually going inside of a reverse sphere shape, and the rectangles are too big to go in them. There for they pop out. The rectangles and sphere's would not really be in the system, they are just simple examples. Molecules would be even more complex which would make it actually even more impossible for them to fit.
nanogirl 4 years ago
I hope so. I am left with the question. What happens if a nano-selector gets jammed. Obviously under some conditions this could spell disaster. Maybe the nano selector can be designed in such a way that when it know it is jammed (no rotation possible) it will rotate the other way, and then back again.
terrafirmaterrafirma 4 years ago
Think of it this way, you can not fit a square peg into a round hole. If the positive shape does not match the negative shape, it will not go in, thus will not jam. If you want more details on this design, check out the book Nanosystems by Drexler.
nanogirl 4 years ago
ummm, you may not *perfectly* fit a square peg into a round hole, but you can certainly fit something that will jam the nano-selector. Example, you can certainly feed a fat enough needle into a lock and jam it.
terrafirmaterrafirma 4 years ago
(Read first) If a molecule doesn't fit into a binding site it binds very poorly and comes off right away, (remember that there is not just a shape interaction here, but a chemical interaction as well). There are cases in biology with protein enzymes, in which a molecule will bind tightly to a site and poison the enzyme from working further - these involve multi step reactions in which the poison fits the first step but not the second step.
nanogirl 4 years ago
The turning of the nano-selector may be faster than the time it take the non-fitting molecule to be rejected. Thus I still hold that the nano selector as depicted in the video is prone to jamming unless additional measures are taken.
terrafirmaterrafirma 4 years ago
Part 1: This is an animation that I made in real time so it is functioning in a real time that you are able to view. Atomic scale is different than ours (not real time), and the representations in this nanoscale scale model reside in that atomic scale time. This is a simulation I made with a computer program, not a physical design with an AFM (a physical design is not here yet) - although you can take a look at nature for references.
nanogirl 4 years ago
Part2: The time and mathematical calculations will be factored into the real design. If you are making the point based on this simulation you are not looking at atomic scale time, nor are you looking at the chemical binding interactions, nor are you looking at the entire nanoassembler design. Again, if you want more technical details you can find them in the designers book, Nanosystems by K. Eric Drexler.
nanogirl 4 years ago
looks like a "nano selector" or "nano selective gate"
trailkeeper 4 years ago
nice,now what about the english?
blazerblast 4 years ago
Magnificent. :-)
tranquilatus 4 years ago
Thank you so much dabiribd!
nanogirl 4 years ago
Cool
dabiribd 4 years ago