So what are the conspiracy nuts saying the explosions were? A bomb? What exactly was the purpose of a bomb that blew up 45min before the towers collapsed?
Was 9/11 an inside job? One minute I think it was then I don't. Part of doesn't want to believe that this horrific disaster was caused by the people who "run" this world!
hey guys, i personally feel that 911 was an inside job. I really want to start converting people who are skeptics though. we need to stop this "the truth seekers" vs "911 was real" style scenario. it just divides people.
Both FEMA and NIST have stated in their reports that Building 7's diesel tanks did not play a part in the building's collapse and that they did not explode.
It's two loud bangs. That doesn't mean they were bombs.
There was an explosion in my back yard loud enough I thought the windows were going to blow out. Was it a Bomb? Nope, a squirrel caused a 13,800 service transformer to expplode.
Right, it was just a "coincidence" that two booming explosions that sound just like bombs just happen to coincide with the scores of other accounts of major explosions in the WTC buildings and proceeded by their fellow firefighter telling them to they better get out of there because the building is about to blow up. And how exactly did a squirrel cause a transformer of that size to explode??
First I'm not claiming a squirrel caused these booms.
Second I 've worked around high voltage and I've seen cats, squirrels, rats, and ice covered tree limbs cause transformers to blow by causing a short across the secondary side of the coils. Call your local popwer company and ask them if it's possible and they'll confirm it.
First of all, I don't doubt these occurrences, but the majority of them result in minor explosions or trips resulting in power failure, not a massive combustible force echoing for miles. If a squirrel rummaging around a generator can do this, then whoever built the generator should be shot. And you're telling me two explosions in succession sounding exactly the same are generator explosions? Be honest for once.
I've always been honest(though sometimes mistaken).
I never said anything about generators did I?
I mentioned transformers BIG difference. Utility transformers are filled with oil and connected to extremely high voltages.
I 'm not saying that the bangs were transformers as I said in the purdue comment neither you nor I have any way of knowing what those 2 loud bangs were unless you have some inside information.
We have a pretty damn good idea when you put it all together. Countless eyewitnesses of explosions -- many of which they state specifically demolition-type explosions, physical trademarks of demolitions, physical evidence of destroyed lobbies, sounds which sound exactly like bombs, squibs firing out of the buildings. Put the pieces together. We HAVE the inside information. You don't wanna hear it.
How is that you'll accept as a forgon conclusion that loud bangs are bombs but, won't concede that a 20 ton jet slamming into a building at 400mph wouldn't knock loose sprayed on fire proofing which is essence a mixture of cement and gypsum?
I accept it because it correlates almost perfectly with all sorts of other evidence, including its very sound, eyewitnesses, the physical characteristics of the collapses, the molten steel, etc. The fireproofing being dislodged is pure speculation. The independent studies NIST did on fireproofing dislodgement showed it didn't happen. The architects of the buildings said the buildings could take multiple crashes and survive just fine.
No I would feel safe betting that it was NOT just a coincidence since apparently at least one of the towers had collapsed and there were probably several buildings as well as vehicles burning when you hear the bangs.
That's why 'coincidence' was written in quotation marks denoting sarcasm. If you are going to use your transformer theory, it raises a lot more questions. Why has this theory not been studied? What evidence is there of this? What could've possibly caused a transformer explosion in a sub-basement level? And would it make two roaring booms, one right after the other as heard on this video?
Did you know that there were two con-ed power substations under WTC7 with huge transformers and they were totally destroyed. Once again I'm not claiming anything other than the facts stated above. I'm making no speculations on if there were or weren't explosions in those sub-stations.
But there is nothing in the official story to explain transformer explosions and it defies all kinds of other physical and circumstantial evidence of controlled demolition.
Actually, I did read about the explosion. It was one loud boom and billowing black smoke. But you are trying to cleverly simplify everything into a neat and tidy explanation. "Well, it could've been anything." I might buy that argument if a) there weren't dozens of reports of multiple explosions, b) the lobbies and sub-basements were completely destroyed BEFORE any collapses, c) if eyewitnesses hadn't reported massive explosions BEFORE a plane struck, CONT'D....
and d) if there weren't all the noticeable demolition characteristics. If there were indeed transformer explosions (which would be inexplicable), it should be investigated. Among many other things, they don't investigate a fucking thing. They just get everything the hell out of there ASAP.
"But there is nothing in the official story to explain transformer explosions"
Why would they even attempt to document every single bang or explosion in such a mass disaster? There could conceivably be hundreds of small explosions during the fires from everyday objects.
You're saying you don't believe the ordinary because it doesn't fit to your CD theory, that's just illogical!
There could NOT be conceivably hundreds of small explosions, especially when (I reiterate) stairwells were leveled, the elevator was blown out like "Bruce Willis out of a Die Hard movie" as one firefighter put it, a 50-hydraulic press was completely destroyed. We can see squibs blasting out 30 floors below the impact zone. Huge pieces of steel beams were ejected hundreds of feet and embedded in neighboring buildings. You don't think that fits the profile of a CD and should be investigated?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If you notice, the guy in the vid said the explosion happened in WTC 7. That had...how many diesel fuel tanks in it? That could have easily been any one of those tanks exploding.
@fafnir242 , a diesel tank blowing inside of a building would not have sounded clear and un-muffled like that. That was loud and concise. If it were deep within the building you would have heard debris blowing everywhere and a very muffled sound.
Either way, do you have any idea how long it takes to rig a complex like the World Trade Center for a controlled demolition? Not the weekend all you truthies are claiming. It would take probably anywhere from four to six months, maybe up to a year (I'm no expert in controlled demolitions) to rig such a complex. We're talking two 110-story towers, plus five other buildings. You don't blow up two 110-story towers in two or three days.
Plus, the collapse of each tower started right at the impact zone. Let me guess. The terrorists just happened to aim their planes right at a batch of bombs in the building to make it look like the plane did the brunt work of the destruction?
So what are the conspiracy nuts saying the explosions were? A bomb? What exactly was the purpose of a bomb that blew up 45min before the towers collapsed?
eli6666666666 3 weeks ago
Was 9/11 an inside job? One minute I think it was then I don't. Part of doesn't want to believe that this horrific disaster was caused by the people who "run" this world!
traceycrosss 1 month ago
Diesel fuel tanks is a worthless talking point brought up years after the fact.
horrorandmetalfan001 5 months ago
diesel fuel needs to be under compression in order to combust yes?
trje246 1 year ago
hey guys, i personally feel that 911 was an inside job. I really want to start converting people who are skeptics though. we need to stop this "the truth seekers" vs "911 was real" style scenario. it just divides people.
FishyMoe 1 year ago
The explosions heard on this widely produced short video is all the evidence that is needed to discredit the lies that we were fed.
ipsofacto297 1 year ago
Both FEMA and NIST have stated in their reports that Building 7's diesel tanks did not play a part in the building's collapse and that they did not explode.
citizenfor911truth 2 years ago 8
Ever seen a 13.8kv breaker explode buddy?
fengineer08 2 years ago
Now watch the video called Precision Demolition and compare how the explosions sound.
DigitalPraise7 3 years ago
This the one you're talking about?
watch?v=RIM1SqPlPhU
fafnir242 3 years ago
Source please. That sounded really really fake. Not claiming that it is, only that it sounded fake, and there is no source for this.
Flyborg 3 years ago
you people are stupid
grzzly015 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 = inside job !
BushLies911 3 years ago
9/11= inside job just look at the evidence!
BushLies911 3 years ago
Does anybody know where I can find this clip in high quality? Is it on any documentaries or anything? Thanks in advance...
ChangeDespair 4 years ago
How do you explain this? Honestly. It's fucking bombs.
passerby23 4 years ago
It's two loud bangs. That doesn't mean they were bombs.
There was an explosion in my back yard loud enough I thought the windows were going to blow out. Was it a Bomb? Nope, a squirrel caused a 13,800 service transformer to expplode.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
Right, it was just a "coincidence" that two booming explosions that sound just like bombs just happen to coincide with the scores of other accounts of major explosions in the WTC buildings and proceeded by their fellow firefighter telling them to they better get out of there because the building is about to blow up. And how exactly did a squirrel cause a transformer of that size to explode??
passerby23 4 years ago
First I'm not claiming a squirrel caused these booms.
Second I 've worked around high voltage and I've seen cats, squirrels, rats, and ice covered tree limbs cause transformers to blow by causing a short across the secondary side of the coils. Call your local popwer company and ask them if it's possible and they'll confirm it.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
First of all, I don't doubt these occurrences, but the majority of them result in minor explosions or trips resulting in power failure, not a massive combustible force echoing for miles. If a squirrel rummaging around a generator can do this, then whoever built the generator should be shot. And you're telling me two explosions in succession sounding exactly the same are generator explosions? Be honest for once.
passerby23 4 years ago
"Be honest for once."
I've always been honest(though sometimes mistaken).
I never said anything about generators did I?
I mentioned transformers BIG difference. Utility transformers are filled with oil and connected to extremely high voltages.
I 'm not saying that the bangs were transformers as I said in the purdue comment neither you nor I have any way of knowing what those 2 loud bangs were unless you have some inside information.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
We have a pretty damn good idea when you put it all together. Countless eyewitnesses of explosions -- many of which they state specifically demolition-type explosions, physical trademarks of demolitions, physical evidence of destroyed lobbies, sounds which sound exactly like bombs, squibs firing out of the buildings. Put the pieces together. We HAVE the inside information. You don't wanna hear it.
passerby23 4 years ago
How is that you'll accept as a forgon conclusion that loud bangs are bombs but, won't concede that a 20 ton jet slamming into a building at 400mph wouldn't knock loose sprayed on fire proofing which is essence a mixture of cement and gypsum?
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
I accept it because it correlates almost perfectly with all sorts of other evidence, including its very sound, eyewitnesses, the physical characteristics of the collapses, the molten steel, etc. The fireproofing being dislodged is pure speculation. The independent studies NIST did on fireproofing dislodgement showed it didn't happen. The architects of the buildings said the buildings could take multiple crashes and survive just fine.
passerby23 4 years ago
"it was just a "coincidence" that two booming"
No I would feel safe betting that it was NOT just a coincidence since apparently at least one of the towers had collapsed and there were probably several buildings as well as vehicles burning when you hear the bangs.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
That's why 'coincidence' was written in quotation marks denoting sarcasm. If you are going to use your transformer theory, it raises a lot more questions. Why has this theory not been studied? What evidence is there of this? What could've possibly caused a transformer explosion in a sub-basement level? And would it make two roaring booms, one right after the other as heard on this video?
passerby23 4 years ago
Did you know that there were two con-ed power substations under WTC7 with huge transformers and they were totally destroyed. Once again I'm not claiming anything other than the facts stated above. I'm making no speculations on if there were or weren't explosions in those sub-stations.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
But there is nothing in the official story to explain transformer explosions and it defies all kinds of other physical and circumstantial evidence of controlled demolition.
passerby23 4 years ago
passerby23, are you watching the news today?
Did you see the transformer explosion and fire in Jacksonville FL?
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
Actually, I did read about the explosion. It was one loud boom and billowing black smoke. But you are trying to cleverly simplify everything into a neat and tidy explanation. "Well, it could've been anything." I might buy that argument if a) there weren't dozens of reports of multiple explosions, b) the lobbies and sub-basements were completely destroyed BEFORE any collapses, c) if eyewitnesses hadn't reported massive explosions BEFORE a plane struck, CONT'D....
passerby23 4 years ago
"c) if eyewitnesses hadn't reported massive explosions BEFORE a plane struck,"
Whoa backup. Got a video or transcript of these witnesses?
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
"c) if eyewitnesses hadn't reported massive explosions BEFORE a plane struck"
Still waiting on corroboration.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
and d) if there weren't all the noticeable demolition characteristics. If there were indeed transformer explosions (which would be inexplicable), it should be investigated. Among many other things, they don't investigate a fucking thing. They just get everything the hell out of there ASAP.
passerby23 4 years ago
"But there is nothing in the official story to explain transformer explosions"
Why would they even attempt to document every single bang or explosion in such a mass disaster? There could conceivably be hundreds of small explosions during the fires from everyday objects.
You're saying you don't believe the ordinary because it doesn't fit to your CD theory, that's just illogical!
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
There could NOT be conceivably hundreds of small explosions, especially when (I reiterate) stairwells were leveled, the elevator was blown out like "Bruce Willis out of a Die Hard movie" as one firefighter put it, a 50-hydraulic press was completely destroyed. We can see squibs blasting out 30 floors below the impact zone. Huge pieces of steel beams were ejected hundreds of feet and embedded in neighboring buildings. You don't think that fits the profile of a CD and should be investigated?
passerby23 4 years ago
"There could NOT be conceivably hundreds of small explosions"
I was speaking of while the fires were burning. You know the ones in WTC1,2 & 3
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
And 3? Since when do you hear hundreds of explosions in a fire?
passerby23 4 years ago
When there's a large fire(s) with lots of things that can explode.
arkgunslinger 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If you notice, the guy in the vid said the explosion happened in WTC 7. That had...how many diesel fuel tanks in it? That could have easily been any one of those tanks exploding.
fafnir242 3 years ago
@fafnir242 , a diesel tank blowing inside of a building would not have sounded clear and un-muffled like that. That was loud and concise. If it were deep within the building you would have heard debris blowing everywhere and a very muffled sound.
marcpinke 2 years ago 4
Either way, do you have any idea how long it takes to rig a complex like the World Trade Center for a controlled demolition? Not the weekend all you truthies are claiming. It would take probably anywhere from four to six months, maybe up to a year (I'm no expert in controlled demolitions) to rig such a complex. We're talking two 110-story towers, plus five other buildings. You don't blow up two 110-story towers in two or three days.
fafnir242 2 years ago
Plus, the collapse of each tower started right at the impact zone. Let me guess. The terrorists just happened to aim their planes right at a batch of bombs in the building to make it look like the plane did the brunt work of the destruction?
fafnir242 2 years ago
boOm
vsv23te 4 years ago
that was like 10 minuts after the building falls.
NOT THE PLANE.
vitto 4 years ago