Nassim Haramein 12/45

[UseUrDamnHead]

To all posters who seem to think they have PhDs in physics:

Since you're all so great at physics and so dependent on institutionalized research & education, please help me resolve this problem.

Two large structures weighing in at over 150,000 tons of steel and concrete are almost completely pulverized during a 12 - 15 second collapse. My point? No establishment physicists want to touch this because they already understand the implications. We see a similar circumstance here.

[Scisseron]

The camera man NEVER shows the things we all want to see...

[gorddown1111]

holy shit 33 still to go!

[johnjames1971]

it would be helpfull if the camera man would focus on the slide show and not on him?????

[TheBobathon]

@johnjames1971 dude, it's a personality cult, not a science show. Get with the program.

[UseUrDamnHead]

@TheBobathon:

Yeah, this guy's a personality cult, but there's nothing wrong with the current state of society and Hollywood/politics/materialism­. Perhaps it is you who needs to get with the program. Protecting one's ego from the possibility that they don't really understand ANYTHING about reality is a normal reaction to hearing radical theories. Pythagoras as well as Plato had "cults" of followers, yet we still managed to get past that since we still utilize their theories & ideas today.

[airfaith]

this guy reminds me of all those people that basically sit around and find meaning in things that really arnt there, i mean, overlapping a load of pictures which are only shapes to begin with and are all similar size OFCOURSE theyre are going to match lol, its so sad to see that people have missed basic logic in life.

[ludacrisbutler]

i love how all of this is summed up as New Age crap. Fair enough, so let's go ahead and sum up your science as Old Age crap. Fair enough. Where has that gotten us? Continuous feeding of negative energy. When do we move beyond this? The change has to begin within each of us before it can change at all. Uh oh, more New Age crap..

[TheBobathon]

@ludacrisbutler I agree, we don't need judgementalism. But we do need some ability to tell between those who dedicate their lives to investigating the nature of reality, and those who just make things up and use jargon, charisma and PR to convince people that they're something they're not. I'm afraid this guy is the latter. He's a fraud, and he makes a living by manipulating his followers, and that ain't positive energy.

Investigation, evidence, reasoning and discussion at bit [dot] ly/haramein.

[Karma01010]

@TheMikejk.

Another myth.

Please Google; "left brain right brain - a myth"

We can now watch the hemispheres of the brain operating, in real-time, using fMRI scanning. This has shown that all complex behaviours and cognitive functions use multiple brain regions in both hemispheres of the brain, integrating the two. There is a degree of asymmetry for some tasks, but nothing even approaching the simplistic myth of "left/right ways of thinking".

[TheMikejk]

Red herring. It is well established that the hemispheres of the brain have distinct functions, eg left brain logic and right brain imagination. Naturally there is a cross over of functions in order to be fully cognitive. The point is, Nassim uses a deliberate right-brain approach ie imaginative in the style of Einstein. That doesn't mean he's using only his right brain. You're the one with the simplistic view.

[Karma01010]

Nope. Logic and imagination ARE NOT split between left and right hemispheres of the brain. It is a persistent MYTH, usually held by the same idiots who still believe the "we only use 10% of the brain" MYTH.

It has been totally disproven, as I showed, by modern fMRI imaging.

You are decades out of date.

Did you even bother to read any of the evidence obtainable by simply googling for the ACTUAL BRAIN RESEARCH on this subject, as opposed to stupid urban mythology?

[TheMikejk]

I'm not interested in dogma and pedantry. You miss the whole point. I was using a metaphor to describe two distinct ways of thinking and reasoning. You're using dogma to argue against a presentation style.

[Karma01010]

How is this a "metaphor", YOU SAID;

"It is well established that the hemispheres of the brain have distinct functions, eg left brain logic and right brain imagination".

That has been TOTALLY disproven by direct observation of operating, living, thinking brains, using functional MRI scanning and other techniques.

You claimed a physical fact, not a "metaphor". Stop making excuses, your'e just wrong.

[airfaith]

@Karma01010

i like when theres atleast ONE person other than me in threads that can see logic

[UseUrDamnHead]

@Karma01010

This is an ongoing debate within the field of psychology. It is by no means dis-proven, OR proven. Wikipedia seems to be a major source of your information. A good vocabulary and decent writing skills do not make you an expert on multiple subjects.

[Karma01010]

vexman. What testable evidence does he give? His "theories" are vague and nonsensical, his "diagrams" are the same meaningless but very pretty looking shapes beloved of all New Age loonies and crystal energy nutcases, and his math is full of arbitrary assumptions and errors - for example, at one stage he compares a lenght (measured in arbitrary units of centimeters!) to the dimensionless Phi Ratio! A schoolboy level error.

[TheMikejk]

His theoretical approach is essentially "right brain", in that he uses visual images a great deal and puts imaginative cognition on the same level as empiricism. I personally find it rather energising. Perhaps he makes the odd error, but that is not a reason to toss out his entire thesis. Who knows what may come of this?

[UseUrDamnHead]

@Karma01010:

He compares a ratio of two lengths (length to length i.e. cm / cm = no units) to the Phi Ratio. You can apply the Phi Ratio the same way you can apply ANY ratio to anything (including distance) otherwise, it wouldn't be of much use. So far, the only thing with units of cm that he has utilized is Planck's constant. Nothing "arbitrary" about the unit of centimeters in Planck's constant. Sounds like you performed another wiki/google search here.

[UseUrDamnHead]

@Karma01010

It's funny that you actually think that a group of scientists who have made their entire lives into figuring such things out would actually acknowledge a complete outsider. In fact, this is hilarious! Please define the specific points where a "physics undergraduate" could "see straight through this nonsense" yet not understand the fundamental problems with two 100,000+ ton steel buildings near free falling to complete obliteration.

[Karma01010]

Legitimate is not "subjective" or "a matter of opinion".

Why doesn't he submit his "paper" to Nature or some other major physics journal? Because he's bogus. and he knows it.

[vexman7]

@Karma01010 im sure he has but that's another problem so what do they do? ignore it

[vexman7]

@Karma01010 im sure this guy wouldnt have spent 10 years or more of his life in this study to come to the conclusion that he's insane HE GIVES EVIDENCE

[ludacrisbutler]

or how the same object can be in two places at once, and why atoms constantly pop in and out of existence, for starters, I won't be able to consider them legitimate.

[ludacrisbutler]

Legitimate is subjective, based purely on opinion. I find Nassim to be legitimate. You do not. To you, those scientists are legitimate. To me, they have done nothing but come up with more questions without answering any. Until your "legitimate" scientists can give me insight on dark matter and anti matter on a meaningful level (saying something other than it's invisible and we don't know much about it),

[ludacrisbutler]

legitimate scientist? Like one of the scientists he mentioned that were published in peer review journals? Or are they not legitimate either? What is "legitimate"?

[Karma01010]

"Legitimate" is submitting ones supposedly groundbreaking work to a major peer-reviewed physics journal such as Nature, not to some side-show open-to-anyone category at a rented-space computing conference in Belgium.

"Legitimate" is discussing ones ideas with the international physics community, as opposed to "lecturing" and selling expensive DVD sets to a scientifically-naive public.

[UseUrDamnHead]

@Karma01010

No, "legitimate" is when you are considered a "FELLOW" (actual term in academia) AND you submit your work (that you have completed during your PAID tenure at a RECOGNIZED university alongside other FELLOWS) and then your OTHER fellows peer review the work to make sure that they really are unable to complete the work and grab the credit (damn!). Long gone are the days when an "outsider" could be a major influence in academia (such as Einstein was).

[indie3]

They don't like him because he is misleading people, with the aim of making money (15 million to carry on his "research" lol). This stuff only seems important to those who don't already know basic things about physics, fractals and astronomy. He appeals to, and depends upon, peoples ignorance of these topics. Wake up.

[UseUrDamnHead]

@indie3

Does YOUR "basic" information include an education outside of Wiki and Google searches? Gee, I had to take several physics classes in college, yet up to video 12, I haven't had a problem with any of his theorizing. I know several dozen students at a reputable university that took a basic astronomy class and have no clue about astronomy. I again refer to the failure of academia in challenging the idea of several Newtonian laws being broken in the official story of 9/11. Who's reputable?

[Fliping187]

I don't know why so many people don't like this guy. This is important stuff. Wake Up, people.

[zybyl]

Can you imagine any legitimate scientist going on about CROP CIRCLES? Get a tinfoil hat or get real.

[ureallidiots]

Even though some of NH´s statements are simply logical, it take a great mind to put the pieces together with such finesse.

As regarding to crop circles, not even John Lundberg, Circle Maker (hoaxer), belive people to be the originators of ALL circles! When closely examined I find that there are even visual tell tale signs in most hoax circles. Btw simply stating that secrecy is part of the game (or art) is merly a tric to stay mystic, like some David Copperfield of crop-fields. pun intended

[saltycreefer]

Wait til we find out what our bodies are actually capable of doing...

[BlandyDoes]

Holy hell... I mean I understand how much we don't know or are not told or taught in "their" education system, but to think that most of our science is a load of crap as well, I mean that is just lazy! lol or they do know all of this but to keep it under wraps they had to invent the "public knowledge" to keep people from asking too many questions.

[UseUrDamnHead]

@BlandyDoes

"They" most definitely know all of this and much more. It is likely that most "UFO" sightings are test flights of our own military's many technologies that we don't know about. The Nazis were testing anti-gravity UFO-shaped craft in the 30's and 40's and the US just happened to confiscate Nazi scientists and create NASA with them. Werner von Braun is one example of the Nazi - NASA scientist crossover. Gravity manipulation is just one thing that this science makes possible.

[BlandyDoes]

Reminds me of Contact (movie)... with the schematics to build a stargate. Perhaps what the ancients are trying to tell us is that the stargate lays within us if we only knew how to turn it on!

[yozzaful]

awesome and compelling stuff. thanks for posting these . really enjoying them.

[maydaymosley]

I think this guy is going to be the catalyst for a new era

[keytoothed]

I couldn't believe the rabid attacks, all the venom and vitriol against this guy's theories by the guys running Wikipedia. I mean, Nassim Haramein literally has them foaming at the mouth so bad, they voted basically to permanently get rid of him for all intents and purposes. Why is this? Because they can't stand that a guy who never went to Harvard could so creatively turn their theories on their heads. They can't stand a non-mechanistic, non-Newtonian model! It gives them seizures.

[dumbnetworks]

its all about logic and thinking, this guy mix up a buch of very well known stuff, to get something he wants from it, thats all he does. nothing new here

[XxDregonxX]

He's doing more than you are. All you're doing is complaining.

[dumbnetworks]

do not attack me, I'm doing fine thanks, what I try to say is that, he has some interesting stuff about vacuum and black holes, and he combines it with very questionable stuff like crop circles?... and he is ignorant sometimes like "the 2X jupiter sized comet" look for NEAT comet for more.

[comeonewtf]

@dumbnetworks yeah but no one seems to listen, that's why it's good to have him and others who are willing to say it.

[STARDORKS]

he speaks the truth

[SlimD11]

The ancients knew the answer and now we find ourselves asking the same question again and again.

[RobertaPeck]

Nissan's brilliant Unified Field Theory is being clouded by the fact that the awsome art of the Circlemakers(see Circle Makers)who consider mystery as part of their art , have captured Nissan's pure questing immagination, making his brilliant Unified Theory seems unworthy of even interest by mainstream physicists- because of too many ad homin assumptions.

[jcoverload]

K wait a minute....is he trying to make me believe in aliens & or other dimensional beings? Also, I get the whole, "we need to wake up from la la land" thing. Problem is...as long as we have MEN, and lord knows I love em, but they've been heavily brainwashed by tv, so how are we suppose to rip those suckers away from their sports? Trust me, I've tried...lol We all know the stronghold the tv has on our species. If aliens were here and they wanted us to evolve, they'd turn off our power. no?

[STARDORKS]

watching sports on tv is the most pathetic thing ever

[strictsum]

I am new to this "new" mindset. You know rethinking everything you've been taught. Well I started rethinking this also. What if this is just part of the plan. Have everyone rethinking their religion and start thinking everyone is really worshiping the sun god but through different text such as the bible and islam and every other religion. Seems they all go back to sun worship. This could be part of the plan. Just in it's infant stages.

[orendo]

Haramein is not even a pseudo-scientist. His entire "work" is based on his intuition and dabbing with the occult. Someone basing his theories on such "empirical evidence" as crop circles (most of which have been shown to be hoaxes) doesn't deserve any recognition. On his website (containing numerous spelling mistakes) he asks for donations using PayPal. How pathetic! I suggest him to go back to being a ski instructor; at least he'll make an honest living that way.

[heyim89yearsold]

He's not basing his work on these crop circles. He's using this along with many others ideas as examples validating even further that this tetrohedron design is mysteriously accurate in its implications on universal physics

[colectivoafromedusa]

you are a short-minded cretin.

better go watch some fox news

[EnochEridani]

Orendo - do a little research yourself before posting a crappy statement like that. Are you religious btw?

[orendo]

Au contraire, I'm actually an atheist. And I believe it's exactly the same mindset that religious people have that make other people believe in the things Haramein is saying. I did enough research about Haramein to support my claims (including finding out why his entry was removed from Wikipeda; the editors showed how he uses under-graduate formulas out of context&how he mixes up basic terms). If you have credible scientific online sources w/ regards to Haramein, I'll be happy to check them out.

[EnochEridani]

There are certain people within the 'establishment' who would rather Nassim keep quiet. There is a lot of 'funding' money tied into science and research so a new comer like Nassim poses a threat to many within the 'regular' science community who's lively hoods depend on their current research. Some of these people have academic links to Wikipedia which incidentally has a good deal of real crap on it.

[wannabeastarrover]

finally another fellow whos awake and sees truth

also nassim rocks

[EnochEridani]

David Icke - for example - is still on Wikipedia. Do you seriously think that they believe he is a more credible source of information than someone like Nassim? You really haven't done ANY research whatsoever. Open at least ONE of your eyes Orendo.

[wannabeastarrover]

maramien is scientiffic and logical religion lacks reason and logic , just cos hes got a closer answer too all the miss interpetation of ancient knowledge and bases it on logcial findings does not mean hes a religious nut.

bible is an ancient knowledge put into text, and miss interpeted twisted and alltered through out the ages . religion is a mental illness nassim is far far from ill hes very lucid and smart

[wannabeastarrover]

also im atheist in the sense that i dont belive in any one so called god, you dont have to be religious to understand nassim

[UseUrDamnHead]

@orendo:

You forget that all scientific theory(emphasis here) requires the same mindset that religious people have. Also, let's not forget how vilified most of history's groundbreaking scientists were. It isn't just a church thing. The church was Europe's head of science during the middle ages and everyone thought that THEIR theories & evidence were fully supportable. They had to threaten excommunication to maintain their stranglehold on science. It seems similar methods are used today.

[EnochEridani]

I had two british doctors of physics corroborate enough of Nassims work for me [and them] to be confident enough of it stacks up. Be suspicious of organizations like Wiki. We still live in a competitive society where over emphasis is made on money, power and 'looking good.

[EnochEridani]

This is as rife within the science community as it is anywhere else. There's an old saying in England that goes; 'Share not your wisdom with swines'. Reason? Well look at your reaction to Nassim. What would you be saying hundreds of years ago when suddenly you heard someone say the world wasn't flat but round?

[CrabHunter]

Not sure if I agree with all of his points yet (long elaborate comment would need to be posted), but what he says at 4:10 about current cosmology, is really good and true. Also, check out videos about "Plasma Cosmology" and "Cosmological Quest 2".