he was in the right place, a footpath - where all cyclists should be, if you dont have a licence plate, and insurance, you shouldernt be cycleing on the road
the thing is, cyclist are trying to exercise or save money, or even save the plant, while people in cars, are just wasting money and polluting the environment, be proud of them for trying to do something to help your community
@mellowNdark I see cyclists run red lights and stop signs fairly often. I ALSO see drivers speeding, failing to yield to pedestrians, rolling through stop signs, blowing red lights 1-2 seconds after the light changes, etc. The point is, one shouldn't generalize about an entire class of road users just because of what some individual does.
your an ignorant twat. maybe it was a teenaged girl or summin a 12yo kid? maybe he didnt have any lights to ride on the road? he was probs just going to the shop being like 5 mins. who gives a fuck you stupid cunt, if he was on the road in your way fair enough. i could barely see him which means you could barley see him so if he was on the road he could of died
@mellowNdark I dont jump red lights and have NEVER seen another cyclist do so, why would someone endanger themselves like that??. Why am I deluded? because I don't agree with you? Who are you to talk down to anybody? Get a life mate, sounds like you are obsessed with cyclists. How sad.
Having had the pleasure to both drive and ride a bike in the UK I say as a country you should learn about having bikes and cars from Holland. The problem with the UK is that most road are already too narrow for cars themeselves then you add bikers and of course disasters are meant to happen. You need clear biking lanes that cyclists can use without getting in the way of drivers.
@mellowNdark LOL, I hate to break it to you but I pay tax and insurance on my car too... therefore I have just as much right to use the road as you do. Most cyclists ALSO drive cars. Why you assume that they ONLY ride bikes?? Because thats what you happen to see them on at the time? Do you imagine they all LIVE on their bikes as well, I mean, its not like they are riding a house down the road now is it? Wow, you are PAINFULLY dumb and self absorbed.....dont believe your story either Im afraid
@mellowNdark You should look up what a "theory" is, I think you dont know what that word actually means. Cycle lane is for bikes, not cars. Cars are dangerous and bikes are not. Man, why are motorists so damn arrogant and self absorbed??
@mellowNdark You posted at me first, so who is the stalker? Then you projected your sexual fantasies on me. You need help . . . . or remedial schooling.
@mellowNdark If it has nothing to do with the video and only you keep making references to animal sex, does that not suggest that you and you alone are interested in it?
As regards you making a video, might I suggest a male gorilla and yourself. You can watch it back from your local hospital's torn anus department.
@mellowNdark I'd never consider the comment of a moron on Youtube as being a threat. Little turds like you hide behind your keyboards.
Look idiot, The cyclist shouldn't be on the footpath. The uploader amended the detail to indicate that there is no cycle path where the cyclist is.
If you post rubbish on my channel I'll just delete it. I could just leave it because it's a sad indictment of you. More fun to annoy you be removing it though!
Lighten up my man, it was dark and it appeared the footpath was deserted. There's assholes and thick cunts in every group; I just don't think this bicyclist qualified for criticism this time. Take care.
@catbells69 We drive on the left in this country, and i know it's a foot path because i walk down it every other day, and you call me the idiot, LOL....Fuck off you thick cunt.
@ilkorocker cyclists are supposed to ride the same direction as the vehicles. There are good and bad cyclists just like there are good and bad vehicle drivers. You have a bad attitude.
Maybe he was on the footpath because there are so many dickhead motorists on the road? Cant say I blame him, if the footpath is empty and the road is busy with idiots then I opt for the footpath too.
@asturel13 yeah, judge with your own eyes how damn empty most footpaths are at ANY time of day by % of the area utilised per hour, say, then look at roads and the pathetic over-congestion. There's lots of spare capacity on footpaths, let's use it somehow or let's have people walking on them instead of getting fatter in their cars!
@PompeyBike2 You have a short memory, "So according to Chewy's weird little fantasy world - He and Ilko are right and the few facts like the location and the presence of a shared use cycle path are lies and a conspiracy by the cycle community to discredit them! Next he'll claim they were painted after the video? Come on Chewy - just admit that you are wrong " 38 OR 55 ?. YOU ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION.
Now we have now shown that he is unable to tell a layby from a footpath Ilkorocker has realised he was talking rubbish and as a result has applied his own mature and eloquent advice, paraphrased below:
He didn't get his facts right before shooting his big fucking mouth off, and has now now shut the fuck up,"?
Will he now apply the other adage that as a result he (again I paraphrase) "so the driver to my video is in the wrong. If you don't know the highway code you shouldn't be on the road...
@PompeyBike2 LOL, That's good coming form someone who cant tell the difference between a cycle path and a footpath, like ILKO said. it "renders your argument invalid". and nobody gives a shit about your crappy videos,everybody else admitted they were wrong, except YOU, grow up, how old are you ?, 38/55.
Now we know Chewy doesn't lie at all, he is simply mistaken all the time....
The admission I was wrong is below for all to see (except Chewy who apparently can't see it)
Just below tha post where you lied about the WheelyGd video claiming he hadn't seen it!
Then had to admit he was lying (sorry was mistaken) when his suggestion that cyclist had no right to be on a path with a massive great bicycle painted on it!
Thanks once again for making my points for me.... I must concede that I could not have illustrated your evident maturity and the contribution you make to the use of the English Language
@PompeyBike2 Being a senile, compulsive lying, old queer, who cant tell the difference between a cycle path and a footpath, renders your argument invalid.
On the other hand , "Fuck off" is far easier than simply being unable to ask why you think a pavement is a layby I suppose, the challenge is still open, please explain why you can't tell the difference......
@PompeyBike2 If you want to ask chew1047 question, then send it to him, why do you keep posting them on my video?. i don't like your sort, that's why i blocked you, now will you fuck off,
@ilkorocker He cant ask me questions directly because Ive sussed him out and he blocked me, so just block the old queen, and yes he is old, hes just pretending to be 38, hes at least 55.
@PompeyBike2 there you go again, talking about genitalia and maturity, it will be children, playgrounds and homosexuality next, why don't you just fuck off you old puff.
Are you still claiming that YouTube allow you to make a disposable account with false details.
Not at all , cant be done - the Pompeybike2 account doesn't exist ?
A bit like your ridiculous and unfounded claim that I was deleting posts , and that the demonstrated difference between "Comment removed" and "Comment deleted" being total "Bullshit and a conspiracy between myself and Youtube?
Surely no-one can really be that ignorant of the way Youtube works.... or can they?
@PompeyBike2 What have we established so far,- you're a compulsive lying old man who makes false YouTube accounts, lies about his age, with a fixation of, playgrounds, children, immaturity, homosexuality, and you like to stalk people, The big questions now are, how many false YouTube accounts do you have ?, how old are you claiming to be on them ?, and what are you doing with them ?. I like using your why of analysing people, it's amazing what you come with.
So you really think that littering your posts with expressions like "bum chum" (which you now claim is a term of friendly endearment) is mature and adult?
The anger issues is demonstrated by the psychological need of you and your mates to "get to kill things" , again your expression.
If this is your opinion of a normal mature adult then I really fele sorry for you.
@PompeyBike2 Let me remind YOU...... I said " IF " that homophobic then im proud of it, lying as now become second nature to you, Are you still claiming that YouTube allow you to make a disposable account with false details so that you can carry on stalking someone ?.
@chew1047 Lets just imagine your right- call someone a "prick" = you have a fixation with genitalia. use the term "Bum Chum" = you're a homosexual, use capitals letters, = you have anger issues,... Then what does it mean when you keep saying things like- childlike name calling, immature manner, playground flounce, playground posturing, ? This is your way of logical reasoning not mine, so what does this make you ?, Combine this with your compulsive lying and things start to fall into place.
I cant remember saying i had a fixation with genitalia......PRICK.
I think that illustrates that point quite nicely, don't you
You also need to also look at the previous posts, I haven't used homophobic or homosexual as an insult at all, simply asked why you felt that "bum chum" should be used as an insult... can you reply
None of these are insults, just valid descriptions of what you have posted here... you could of course answer why you feel to act in such an immature manner?
@PompeyBike2 Quote,""You have stated that you are a homophobe with pathological tendencies and a fixation with genitalia"I cant remember stating that, LYING again, i suppose i shouldn't expect any better from a 38 year old compulsive liar, Are you still claiming that YouTube allow you to make a disposable account with false details so that you can carry on stalking someone ?.
@PompeyBike2 Quote 2,"By the way your homoerotic fixation with "Bum Chum" - something you want to tell us?" It was you that linked it with homosexuality not me, "Bum Chum" also means good friends,.. So lets see what we have now, I call you a prick and you think i have a fixation with genitalia, I use the term "Bum Chum" and you think im homosexual, I use capitals to illustrate what a LIER you are and you think i have anger issues, and god only knows why you think I'm homophobic ?. YOU NEED HELP
There is a difference - whereas you don't understand the highway code, as the path was dark and not visible,I checked the reference given on Google, and when Ilkorocker failed to deny this accepted this and further checked with NCC - read what was written.
So on this evidence I was wrong and stated so.
You were wrong in daylight - Despite the big bicycle on the path you couldn't tell that this sign meant cyclepath and questioned whether cyclists should be on it??
I simply asked if you understand Youtube yet, or why you feel the use of "bum chum" is mature?
Why should that be a problem, you can answer why can't you.. or is it time for another tantrum?
You have stated that you are a homophobe with pathological tendencies and a fixation with genitalia- add that to your claim that Youtube is collaborating to falsify posts you don't like, and I think it illustrates my points nicely
@PompeyBike2 LOL, I cant remember saying i had a fixation with genitalia, i think you are LYING again, Now are you going to make your mind up, am i homosexual or homophobic ?. you've tried both insults and they are not working so what next ?. let me remind you of some of other insults you have tried that haven't worked, pathological tendencies, playground flounce, immaturity, homoerotic fixation, delusional, immature playground posturing, unintelligible gibbering, ext ext, Keep it simple, PRICK.
@PompeyBike2 Ill tell you what i do know about YouTube, they allow you to block annoying little tossers like you, but i cant find anything about disposable accounts ?, Now why would YouTube allow you to make a disposable account so you can carry on annoying someone ?. are you saying this is YouTube's standard practice ?. if so, whats the point in blocking someone in the first place ?, + you don't have to put how old you are so why did you choose lie and say you're 38 ?.
@PompeyBike2 Now lets see, posting 3 videos just because you where wrong about the cycle path, sending me 100's of pointless comments, going through all my videos and comments, bringing up a comment i made to someone 5-6 months ago, making a second account because Ilko blocked you, just so you can send me more of your pointless comments, if this isn't stalking i don't know what is,
Oh dear, mentioning insecurities and then illustrating perfectly Ascione's linking between abuse and insecurity,, boredom and a need to control wether they are unable to do so in their normal lives
As to joining you, no thanks - I have shown why you find it so exciting and fail to share your psychological needs, especially with something as inadequate as a .22 or similar, just doesn't float my boat!
2. We are off in a spin - incoherent drivel, is this what they mean by incoherent rage?
3. Did you mean LIAR, or is LIER a new insult
All I did was ask why you found a fascination with homosexual epiphets as insults - I presume they were meant to offend, which means that you have a problem as you are either hompohobic, or trying to prove that you are, which is common in cases of denial.
@PompeyBike2 Did you mean epiphets or epithets ?, Did you mean hompohobic or homophobic ?, Did you mean wether or whether ?, Did you mean beyween or between ?. Whats is all this incoherent drivel ?, LOL, and you call me childish & immature, and as for "homosexual" i hate to disappoint you but im happily married with 3 great kids, typical foreign holiday once a year, half decent job, ext ext, If that makes me hompohobic, sorry i mean homophobic, then i must be, and proud of it.
@PompeyBike2" A second account with the same details, so when blocked, a disposable account can be created, but needs altered details" HA HA HA HA, What the fuck is this shit, LYING again,
What he fuck is this shit... it is your ignorance of the way Youtube works.
Why can't I create an identity called Chew 1047 with your details, it is because it is unique and cannot be reproduced. Therefore you alter the details (did you notice the 2 as in Pompeybike2) and alter the date of birth - this allows you to create an account that can be used for a specific account that you have been blocked and then disposed of .
@PompeyBike2 You must learn to live with your insecurities, you cant keep on lying to people, try being nice, try to find something other than YouTube, try trainspotting instead of stalking people, i like to go hunting (or abusing small animals if you prefer) it gets me out of the house and me and my mates get to kill things, it helps with my anger issues, you can come with us if you like. That would be fun don't you think ?.
When you stated that my reply explaining the way that Youtube worked was"lying bullshit", you imply that Youtube must have collaborated with me in order for the annotations to be there.
Either that or your accusation that it lying bullshit is (ironically) in fact just that.....with such a poor level of understanding there is no point answering further until you clarify which one, as if I was lying then so was YouTube, or neither of us where
@PompeyBike2 Yes i think you and YouTube collaborated with each other and come up with all the bull shit, OK, Now what ?. what the fuck you going to do now. If that's what you want to think its ok by me, Now answer this, do think answering a question is gloating ?. are you 38 or 55 ?. wheres that apology you claim to have made ?.
@ilkorocker No, i know ill never know if he's telling the truth or not, but it is amusing watching him try to twist and turn his why out of the hole he's dug himself, its better than watching coronation street anyway, LOL.
Excellent - that is truly delusional especially the anger issues -"What the fuck are you going to do now?" is a good example
The apology has been addressed previously IRTDGTMPA...
As to age - do you know so little o the way Youtube works?
A second account with the same details, so when blocked, a disposable account can be created, but needs altered details .... simple for those with the most basic knowledge
Gloating? people can read for themselves and make up their own minds
@PompeyBike2 Fucking hell, that's amazing, LOL, you're good ill give you that, i suppose it;s years of bullshitting that get you this good, but bullshitting wont get you out of this one, you're just making yourself look a proper twat. keep it up, most entertaining.
Its all there on this video and your channel.... Except the ones you removed of course, and the anger issues and maturity self evident
Shame Ilkorocker can't or won't justify his claim that pavements are laybys though.
Whereas I inquired from Nottingham City Council as to whether this was a cyclepath, I doubt he will do the same, and write to Portsmouth City Council state that he is wrong when the evidence comes forward.
@PompeyBike2 Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar . What a fucking LYING little wanker you are. I've just had a look on your channel and its evident that this all you do, try to upset people, well its going to work with me, I've proven that your a LYING pathetic excuse of a man so don't bother replying because you wont get one back, now get on your push bike and fuck off, PRICK.
@PompeyBike2 If you read it properly i was answering a question, now you have twisted it again, someone asked do they all twitch like that ?, and i answered them, hows that gloating ?. but if you want to think i have anger issues then feel free to do so, i don't care what you think, Now what about that apology on the cycle path and a footpath thing you got round your bollocks, i still cant find it ?, and the embarrassing claim of being 38 ?. you seem to keep forgetting them.
"I deleted my reply because your getting boring, I've proven you're a LIAR, not much more i can do"
So it was such definitive proof that you were afraid to leave it up for scrutiny?
More likely you realised that your claims were becoming more outlandish and wanted them removed because you now find them embarassing (a wise decision on your part)
By the way do you mean:
"This may help you"
or
"This may be of help to you"
Your statement "This may help to you" doesn't make sense
So, so sad.... I will simplify it even further for you....there are two alternatives
1.I was lying about Nottingham Cyclists post in which case Youtube is also lying by falsifying the "Comment removed"
2. The "Comment removed" on Nottingham cyclists post means I am telling the truth and you are posting rubbish
Which one?
What is really interesting is that you removed the posts below - I assume you realise just how stupid and infantile they were - please enlighten us as to why
You have failed to answer if Youtube is lying.... I have explained twice how Youtube works and the difference between "Comment deleted" and "Comment removed"
Despite the irrefutable evidence displayed by the annotation sysstem that the poster removed this (Nottingham Cyclist) you now claim that Youtube 's stated annotation system is "Bullshit" and that this is a lie.
Please explain why you are claiming that Youtube is lying to you... or do you really not understand how the annotation works?
@PompeyBike Now then lets see what you say Ive said now,1.YouTube 's stated annotation system is "Bullshit". ?, No i never said that, LYING again, 2. you are claiming that YouTube is lying to you, No, didn't say that one either, LYING yet again, What i have said is- you are a LYING little shit, trying to twist my words again, its going to work, and you have blocked me more than once, LIAR.... interesting
@PompeyBike2 Compulsive lying is a common disorder often caused by low self-esteem and a need for attention. Often, the liar does not realize how often he is lying because it becomes second nature or habit.Compulsive lying alienates friends and loved ones and often brings about the opposite of what the liar wants: instead of getting the attention they often crave, they end up pushing people away. With therapy, many people can overcome their compulsion to lie, This may help to you Pompey.
Given your predilection for abusing small animals and posting the videos
David Milne Psychiatric News May 3, 2002
Volume 37 Number 9 Page 5
In his experience animal abusers come in three broad categories.
“First are people who are mentally ill, second are those who have serious anger-control issues, and third are those who are either not socialized or believe that animal cruelty is an accepted byproduct of some shady business practice”
@PompeyBike2 Back to that old chestnut, we're struggling now aren't we, LOL, I think when you say "abusing small animals" you mean killing rats, there's a big difference, Abusing small animals covers large variety of things, but i suppose it sound better to someone like you to twist it and put it that way, or you can't tell difference. who knows ?, who cares ?. and i find nothing embarrassing about speaking the truth, LYING about your age is embarrassing, saying your 38 when it should be 55,
Either wll do as the meaning is evident.. this is called a "typo" and is ssimply a keyboaardd sslip, as opposed to poor literacy and not understanding entire words such as "you're" instead of your.
Your repeated statement "You're video" which means "you are a video" is gibberish and has a completely different meaning of "your video" which I assumed you meant.
@PompeyBike2 So are you now saying everybody that's posted videos of pest control on YouTube are not socialized or believe that animal cruelty is accepted or suffer from anger-control issues ?.what a strange person you are, all this because you cant tell the difference between a cycle path and a footpath, how sad are you, I've had a look and i cant find that apology anywhere ?, oh yes i forgot that you are a LYING little shit.
Would that be the answer I gave explaining how Youtube works and that "Comment removed" means that it was removed means that it was removed by the poster whereas if I had removed it the report would read "Comment deleted"
I did not remove the comment and the evidence shows that this is the case. I can appreciate it is not the answer you want, but are you now saying that Youtube also lying as well?
Please tell me if I can make this simpler for you.
@PompeyBike LOL, OK, Its obvious the truth is to beyond you, that's why you keep trying to twist what i say, but its not working, i know that you are a LYING little shit and you do. that's good enough for me, saying thing like- im denying things Ive never said, saying you have apologised and you haven't, saying you haven't blocked me and you have, the list is getting bigger all the time, not looking good is it Billy LIAR.
Now then lets see what you say Ive said now,1.YouTube 's stated annotation system is "Bullshit". ?, No i never said that, LYING again, 2. you are claiming that YouTube is lying to you, No, didn't say that one either, LYING yet again, What i have said is- you are a LYING little shit, trying to twist my words again,
His statements are below... unless he continues to delete his entries
@PompeyBike2 Are you some sort of fucking stalker, you sad fuck, you really need a new hobby, stalking is illegal,-I deleted my reply because your getting boring, I've proven you're a LIAR, not much more i can do, but thanks for re posting it for me because i stand by what i say, yet you still continue LYING, How old are you ?, is it 55 or 38 ? you cant help it can ya, LYING again, Now what about, "I apologised" did you for get about that one.
@PompeyBike Yes, I've asked you that same question twice ?. im not denying it and i never have, LYING again... you just cant help it can you,"why have you removed comments from one of you're sad videos which was from one of you're fellow bum chum cyclist"---"why did you remove you're fellow cyclists comment from you're video"--same question you thick twat, and then gave me one of you're LYING bullshit answers. Now what about, "I apologised" &," i haven't blocked you", try LYING out of that.
@PompeyBike I think its you getting confused, read it again you thick twat, its reads 5 days ago, page 4 of this video, how did i change it from one to the other when its all in one sentence, LYING yet again, and as for,"connection failure and duplicate post removed", LOL, LYING again, page 4. of this video 6 days ago, i quote "I apologised" LYING again,... same page, i quote," i haven't blocked you",LYING again, you're nothing but a LYING low life.
.. and still the immature playground posturing. Your knowledge of Youtube appears to be about the same as your knowledge of the Highway code!
The one from "Nottingham cyclist" was removed by himself - that is what the annotation means.
Introduced by YouTube in June 2009 the change means that the annotation is "Comment deleted" if deleted by the "owner" of the video and "Comment removed" if taken down by the person who posted.
@PompeyBike Comment removed, PompeyBike AKA Billy no mates or should that be Billy LIAR, 5 days ago, page 4 of this video. you're just a born LIAR, Am i still blocked by you or are you still LYING about that as well ?,
Excellent - the predicted unintelligible gibbering.
1. You haven't been blocked "again"
2. Try 5 days ago - "I am awaiting a reply from the Engineering Department in Nottingham, which hasn't arrived, however if DF2's reply is correct then I will admit to being wrong"
3. I haven't
4. ... Seems your numeracy is on a par with your English as you counted 1,2,3,5!
5. Given your observation skills there would be no point in any subtle hints like the rain?
@PompeyBike I've just tried commenting on one of you're sad videos and surprise surprise, I'm still blocked, you fucking LYING little shit, how can anyone believe a word you say.....LIAR.
@PompeyBike No, I'm explaining fuck all to a little wanker like you, but lets see if you have the bollocks to explain some things to me. 1. why have you blocked me again, 2. you said that you had apologised for you're fuck up on ilok's video, when was that then ?. 3. why have you removed some of you're comments from ilko's video ?. why have you removed comments from one of you're sad videos which was from one of you're fellow bum chum cyclist ? 5. did you get wet filming you're last video LOL.
"No, I'm explaining fuck all to a little wanker like you"
That really translates as I can't so will avoid the issue with a few obscenities rather than explain why you cannot tell a footpath from a layby. You can't justify your claims and pathetically hide away behind insults instead
I don't really expect anything more from you, but it does prove my point about your claims.
@PompeyBike A sad little prick and a LIAR, well done, you know and i know you blocked me. and like i said, I'm not explaining fuck all to a little LYING wanker like you, especially one that cant tell a footpath from a cycle lane. 5 days ago you removed one of you're rantings, it's there for all to see (comment removed) LIAR. and the one you have nicely avoided, why did you remove you're fellow cyclists comment from you're video ?. could you answer the question without LYING this time.
@PompeyBike Chew1047 is right, you are making yourself look a twat, keep it up, and yes i would condemn a car parked on a pavement, but i don't see what that's got to do with my video of a cyclist RIDING on the pavement ?. next question,
How do you think the car got there - teleportation?
My apologies, the link wouldappear to be obvious, but seems to be beyond you. I had assumed that you would have realised that the car must have driven along the pavement to get to this position. Or are you going to claim teleportation, or magic?
Driving on the pavement and cycling on the pavement are both wrong, yet you seem to "Hate" cyclists for this, but don't seem to have a problem with motorists - why?
Please see the preivous answer, but then again you have shown you don't understand pavements and cycle paths in the Pavement Driver video, why are you so afraid of explaining your comments?
You have been asked to explain a ludicrous suggestion on the Pavement Driver video and seem to be reluctant to do so - why?
... and you are not blocked from that video - please explain yourself (if you can)
he was in the right place, a footpath - where all cyclists should be, if you dont have a licence plate, and insurance, you shouldernt be cycleing on the road
paganizondaR73MBZZZ 3 weeks ago
If this is the only thing thats bothering you in your life
Get a life you sanctimonious prick
Fucking dick head
Theknotman1964 1 month ago
the thing is, cyclist are trying to exercise or save money, or even save the plant, while people in cars, are just wasting money and polluting the environment, be proud of them for trying to do something to help your community
reiny6474 2 months ago
FUCK THE IDIOT THAT MADE THIS VIDEO.
jrod8496 2 months ago
I'm a gay cyclist and I want to have steamy man-sex with you big boy! ♥
jerrygreg2 2 months ago
If that incites hatred, I'd hate to see what gets you "buggered".
pacemasterpro 3 months ago
oh ya that was a great reason
CrankbrosLewis 3 months ago
Waaah.
LonLofgren 3 months ago
And that's why I hate most motorists. Not paying attention and making a big deal over nothing. Fucking prick.
iloveprauns 3 months ago 4
@mellowNdark I see cyclists run red lights and stop signs fairly often. I ALSO see drivers speeding, failing to yield to pedestrians, rolling through stop signs, blowing red lights 1-2 seconds after the light changes, etc. The point is, one shouldn't generalize about an entire class of road users just because of what some individual does.
degnaw 3 months ago 3
I ride down that road most days on my way to work. On a motorbike.
I definitely wouldn't ride down there on my pushbike.
I go a different way cos of all the dickheads who drive down there.
I've been cut up, spat on and I see people driving down there EVERY SINGLE DAY on their phones, playing with sat navs etc, etc....
owdrider 3 months ago 2
What's wrong with the footpath anyway? Better to be on a high speed road at night?
jonivaio 4 months ago
As much as i hate cyclists whats the problem? really if the prick is off the road its a win win situation.
squiddy102 4 months ago
you are a prick he is on the sidewalk so he does not have to deal with pricks like you
freakychurchhill 4 months ago
Cyclists should ride with traffic you moron..... Shut the fuck up and get your shit straight
DestroyTheseWalls 4 months ago
It is legal for bicyclist to ride on the sidwalk .Just pay attention to your own driveing like your supposed to.
bangarpacket 4 months ago
@bangarpacket no it isn't legal, this is in the UK, and we call it a 'pavement.'
TVismyopiate 2 months ago
your an ignorant twat. maybe it was a teenaged girl or summin a 12yo kid? maybe he didnt have any lights to ride on the road? he was probs just going to the shop being like 5 mins. who gives a fuck you stupid cunt, if he was on the road in your way fair enough. i could barely see him which means you could barley see him so if he was on the road he could of died
timsurftim 5 months ago
FUCK YOU
SuperUqon 5 months ago
@mellowNdark I dont jump red lights and have NEVER seen another cyclist do so, why would someone endanger themselves like that??. Why am I deluded? because I don't agree with you? Who are you to talk down to anybody? Get a life mate, sounds like you are obsessed with cyclists. How sad.
asturel13 5 months ago
Having had the pleasure to both drive and ride a bike in the UK I say as a country you should learn about having bikes and cars from Holland. The problem with the UK is that most road are already too narrow for cars themeselves then you add bikers and of course disasters are meant to happen. You need clear biking lanes that cyclists can use without getting in the way of drivers.
250GTLUSSO 5 months ago
@mellowNdark LOL, I hate to break it to you but I pay tax and insurance on my car too... therefore I have just as much right to use the road as you do. Most cyclists ALSO drive cars. Why you assume that they ONLY ride bikes?? Because thats what you happen to see them on at the time? Do you imagine they all LIVE on their bikes as well, I mean, its not like they are riding a house down the road now is it? Wow, you are PAINFULLY dumb and self absorbed.....dont believe your story either Im afraid
asturel13 5 months ago
@mellowNdark You should look up what a "theory" is, I think you dont know what that word actually means. Cycle lane is for bikes, not cars. Cars are dangerous and bikes are not. Man, why are motorists so damn arrogant and self absorbed??
asturel13 5 months ago
You sir have problems
DieHard130 5 months ago
at least he was on the pavment so twats like u dont run them over
yellobelly420 5 months ago
BECAUSE YOURE A FUCKIN FAGGOT WHO HAS NO LIFE!!!
MultiNathan66 5 months ago
@mellowNdark Again, projection of your own perversions onto others.
catbells69 6 months ago
Probably a shared-use path, the majority of which allow cycling in both directions. Nothing to see here, just another dickhead motorist.
smith34n 6 months ago
@mellowNdark I've reversed nothing. You're the one who brings up sexual fantasies then projects them onto others.
There are no paedophila videos on Youtube. You must be confusing Youtube with the websites you must frequent.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark You posted at me first, so who is the stalker? Then you projected your sexual fantasies on me. You need help . . . . or remedial schooling.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark Nothing. As we've established, you're the zoophiliac!
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark If it has nothing to do with the video and only you keep making references to animal sex, does that not suggest that you and you alone are interested in it?
As regards you making a video, might I suggest a male gorilla and yourself. You can watch it back from your local hospital's torn anus department.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark What have animals to do with this video?
Keep your fantasies to yourself, weirdo.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark I'd never consider the comment of a moron on Youtube as being a threat. Little turds like you hide behind your keyboards.
Look idiot, The cyclist shouldn't be on the footpath. The uploader amended the detail to indicate that there is no cycle path where the cyclist is.
If you post rubbish on my channel I'll just delete it. I could just leave it because it's a sad indictment of you. More fun to annoy you be removing it though!
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark "Where's the threat???"
Here it is - "Looking forward to 'meeting' you!"
What theory would that be? The mellowNdark "Dumb ass " theory?
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark So, you often drive on footpaths? Is there a wrong side anyway?
You'd never see me on a footpath so your childish threat would never come to fruition.
With your attitude you don't belong on the road.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark Now you're saying that knowing which side of the road to drive on is embarrassing?
As has been pointed out already, the cyclist isn't on the road.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark I see from your channel viewers that they too consider you a "Dumb ass". It must be true.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark How do you know? What is your evidence.
You've already admitted that you're a dumb ass - "Glad we agree!" You agreed it.
You should follow the argument more carefully otherwise you'll always look like a dumb ass.
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark Good, we agree that you should have typed, "I am a Dumbass", in your post.
So, how long have you been a dumb ass?
catbells69 6 months ago
@mellowNdark You forgot the following preceeding words - " I am a"
catbells69 6 months ago
He was on the pavement, so what?
jmeove 6 months ago
The nerve of that guy...
VegardMinde 6 months ago
Lighten up my man, it was dark and it appeared the footpath was deserted. There's assholes and thick cunts in every group; I just don't think this bicyclist qualified for criticism this time. Take care.
policechaser 6 months ago
Was he on the road or the footpath? Or is he some strange quantum cyclist who can be in both places at the same time?
ginganz13 6 months ago
pendejo de mierda no tiene nada q ber eso
bike2458 6 months ago
The cycllist wasn't on the "wrong side of the road" and how do you kow that is a cycle path? Idiot!
catbells69 6 months ago 10
@catbells69 We drive on the left in this country, and i know it's a foot path because i walk down it every other day, and you call me the idiot, LOL....Fuck off you thick cunt.
ilkorocker 6 months ago
@ilkorocker Super. However, he still wasn't on the road.
Only a thick cunt would use lower case for I. Lol. Thick cunt.
catbells69 6 months ago
@ilkorocker Bigs thumbs down to your ignorant little video. HURRAH!
catbells69 6 months ago
@ilkorocker
Why I hate you...
you are a prick.
GREALDO21 5 months ago
@ilkorocker cyclists are supposed to ride the same direction as the vehicles. There are good and bad cyclists just like there are good and bad vehicle drivers. You have a bad attitude.
SuperOlds88 4 months ago 5
@ilkorocker wow not at all aggressive and very civilized. go you
koko56 3 months ago
@ilkorocker ahaha i agree with you.
How would you know it was a cylcle lane, erm because i live there, i filmed it and im not a thik shit of a human being.
aidan21 3 months ago
Maybe he was on the footpath because there are so many dickhead motorists on the road? Cant say I blame him, if the footpath is empty and the road is busy with idiots then I opt for the footpath too.
asturel13 9 months ago 40
@asturel13 yeah, judge with your own eyes how damn empty most footpaths are at ANY time of day by % of the area utilised per hour, say, then look at roads and the pathetic over-congestion. There's lots of spare capacity on footpaths, let's use it somehow or let's have people walking on them instead of getting fatter in their cars!
TVismyopiate 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is that further avoidance:
Why are you lying (are "mistaken") about the admission that I was wrong?
Why did you lie (were "mistaken") about not seeing WheelyGd's channel
Why did you not understand that the big white bicycle on the video denoted a cycle facility - do you not understand the highway code?
Does your demonstrated inability to see that this was a cycle path invalidate your responses?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
Chewy seems unable or unwilling to explain?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 It looks like my work is done. Thanks for the update Ilko, ha ha ha.
chew1047 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chew1047
Why are you lying (are "mistaken") about the admission that I was wrong?
Why did you lie (were "mistaken") about not seeing WheelyGd's channel
Why did you not understand that the big white bicycle on the video denoted a cycle facility - do you not understand the highway code?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
what a bunch of cunts you lot are.
LondonCitygent 1 year ago
Why are you lying (are "mistaken") about the admission that I was wrong?
Why did you lie (were "mistaken") about not seeing WheelyGd's channel
Why did you not understand that the big white bicycle on the video denoted a cycle facility - do you not understand the highway code?
Does your demonstrated inability to see that this was a cycle path invalidate your responses?
You did of course apply the Hubbard principle, and avoid these points, but answers please?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
Answer the questions
Why are you lying (are "mistaken") about the admission that I was wrong?
Why did you lie (were "mistaken") about not seeing WheelyGd's channel
Why did you not understand that the big white bicycle on the video denoted a cycle facility - do you not understand the highway code?
Does your demonstrated inability to see that this was a cycle path invalidate your responses?
You will of course apply the Hubbard principle, and avoid these points, but again that is expected
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 You have a short memory, "So according to Chewy's weird little fantasy world - He and Ilko are right and the few facts like the location and the presence of a shared use cycle path are lies and a conspiracy by the cycle community to discredit them! Next he'll claim they were painted after the video? Come on Chewy - just admit that you are wrong " 38 OR 55 ?. YOU ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION.
chew1047 1 year ago
Now we have now shown that he is unable to tell a layby from a footpath Ilkorocker has realised he was talking rubbish and as a result has applied his own mature and eloquent advice, paraphrased below:
He didn't get his facts right before shooting his big fucking mouth off, and has now now shut the fuck up,"?
Will he now apply the other adage that as a result he (again I paraphrase) "so the driver to my video is in the wrong. If you don't know the highway code you shouldn't be on the road...
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 LOL, That's good coming form someone who cant tell the difference between a cycle path and a footpath, like ILKO said. it "renders your argument invalid". and nobody gives a shit about your crappy videos,everybody else admitted they were wrong, except YOU, grow up, how old are you ?, 38/55.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
Now we know Chewy doesn't lie at all, he is simply mistaken all the time....
The admission I was wrong is below for all to see (except Chewy who apparently can't see it)
Just below tha post where you lied about the WheelyGd video claiming he hadn't seen it!
Then had to admit he was lying (sorry was mistaken) when his suggestion that cyclist had no right to be on a path with a massive great bicycle painted on it!
Does that renders your arguments invalid?
Ilko is simply avoiding
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Whos this "WE" you keep referring to ?. is it 38 year old pompeybike2 and 55 year old pompeybike ?.
chew1047 1 year ago
Well the next instructional video is up for you - you can answer or shall I transfer your answers from here?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
Thanks once again for making my points for me.... I must concede that I could not have illustrated your evident maturity and the contribution you make to the use of the English Language
Well done!
PompeyBike2 1 year ago 2
@PompeyBike2 Who are you talking to now ?, An old queer with senile dementia, if you was a dog they would put you down.
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@ilkorocker
Is that you explanation of why you though a pavement was a layby............Elbert Hubbard rules!
PompeyBike2 1 year ago 3
@PompeyBike2 Being a senile, compulsive lying, old queer, who cant tell the difference between a cycle path and a footpath, renders your argument invalid.
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@ilkorocker
So you can't justify your bizarre claim .... didn't think you could.
About par for the course.
PompeyBike2 1 year ago 3
@PompeyBike2 LOL, What ever, almost as bizarre as you claiming that you;re 38.
ilkorocker 1 year ago
On the other hand , "Fuck off" is far easier than simply being unable to ask why you think a pavement is a layby I suppose, the challenge is still open, please explain why you can't tell the difference......
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
Are you Chewy then?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 If you want to ask chew1047 question, then send it to him, why do you keep posting them on my video?. i don't like your sort, that's why i blocked you, now will you fuck off,
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@ilkorocker He cant ask me questions directly because Ive sussed him out and he blocked me, so just block the old queen, and yes he is old, hes just pretending to be 38, hes at least 55.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
You really like genitalia don't you, now we know you claim you haven't, but your postings really are not backing this up - are they?
I think you have answered my one about maturity, howzabout answering the one about your ignorance?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 there you go again, talking about genitalia and maturity, it will be children, playgrounds and homosexuality next, why don't you just fuck off you old puff.
chew1047 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chew1047
Very much an illustration of Elbert Hubbard's work!
Are you still claiming that your posts are mature and adult?
Are you still claiming that you can't have a second account?
Are you still claiming that the difference between "Comment removed" and "Comment deleted? is as you maturely expressed t "total bullshit and a lie?
Try answering either one?
.. or will you simply further illustrate Hubbard's theory?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@ilkorocker
When you explain why you can't tell the difference between a layby and a pavement?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
What that avoiding the question?
ARe you still claiming that your posts are mature and adult?
Are you still claiming that you can't have a second acount?
Are you still claiming that the difference between "Comment removed" and "Comment deleted? is as you maturely expressed t "total bullshit and a lie?
Try answering any one?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Are you talking to me?. Ive already blocked you once, now will you fuck off,
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@ilkorocker I think you're right Ilko, i should block the dirty bastard, and if he makes another false account, report the filthy cunt.
chew1047 1 year ago
Are you still claiming that YouTube allow you to make a disposable account with false details.
Not at all , cant be done - the Pompeybike2 account doesn't exist ?
A bit like your ridiculous and unfounded claim that I was deleting posts , and that the demonstrated difference between "Comment removed" and "Comment deleted" being total "Bullshit and a conspiracy between myself and Youtube?
Surely no-one can really be that ignorant of the way Youtube works.... or can they?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 What have we established so far,- you're a compulsive lying old man who makes false YouTube accounts, lies about his age, with a fixation of, playgrounds, children, immaturity, homosexuality, and you like to stalk people, The big questions now are, how many false YouTube accounts do you have ?, how old are you claiming to be on them ?, and what are you doing with them ?. I like using your why of analysing people, it's amazing what you come with.
chew1047 1 year ago
So you really think that littering your posts with expressions like "bum chum" (which you now claim is a term of friendly endearment) is mature and adult?
The anger issues is demonstrated by the psychological need of you and your mates to "get to kill things" , again your expression.
If this is your opinion of a normal mature adult then I really fele sorry for you.
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
and god only knows why you think I'm homophobic ?
Let me remind you......
Oh yes.... you stated that you were homophobic and "proud of it"
a small clue there?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Let me remind YOU...... I said " IF " that homophobic then im proud of it, lying as now become second nature to you, Are you still claiming that YouTube allow you to make a disposable account with false details so that you can carry on stalking someone ?.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047 Lets just imagine your right- call someone a "prick" = you have a fixation with genitalia. use the term "Bum Chum" = you're a homosexual, use capitals letters, = you have anger issues,... Then what does it mean when you keep saying things like- childlike name calling, immature manner, playground flounce, playground posturing, ? This is your way of logical reasoning not mine, so what does this make you ?, Combine this with your compulsive lying and things start to fall into place.
chew1047 1 year ago
I cant remember saying i had a fixation with genitalia......PRICK.
I think that illustrates that point quite nicely, don't you
You also need to also look at the previous posts, I haven't used homophobic or homosexual as an insult at all, simply asked why you felt that "bum chum" should be used as an insult... can you reply
None of these are insults, just valid descriptions of what you have posted here... you could of course answer why you feel to act in such an immature manner?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Quote,""You have stated that you are a homophobe with pathological tendencies and a fixation with genitalia"I cant remember stating that, LYING again, i suppose i shouldn't expect any better from a 38 year old compulsive liar, Are you still claiming that YouTube allow you to make a disposable account with false details so that you can carry on stalking someone ?.
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Quote 2,"By the way your homoerotic fixation with "Bum Chum" - something you want to tell us?" It was you that linked it with homosexuality not me, "Bum Chum" also means good friends,.. So lets see what we have now, I call you a prick and you think i have a fixation with genitalia, I use the term "Bum Chum" and you think im homosexual, I use capitals to illustrate what a LIER you are and you think i have anger issues, and god only knows why you think I'm homophobic ?. YOU NEED HELP
chew1047 1 year ago
There is a difference - whereas you don't understand the highway code, as the path was dark and not visible,I checked the reference given on Google, and when Ilkorocker failed to deny this accepted this and further checked with NCC - read what was written.
So on this evidence I was wrong and stated so.
You were wrong in daylight - Despite the big bicycle on the path you couldn't tell that this sign meant cyclepath and questioned whether cyclists should be on it??
Care to explain this?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
You have missed the point entirely
But never mind, I fully accept the statement the=at you are homophobic and proud of it.
Exactly what was expected from someone who uses "bum chum" - in the hoes that people will be offended.
By the way, if you check, you will find that epiphet and epithet are interchangeable in use.
Do you understand how Youtube works yet?
chew1047 1 year ago
You have misssed the point entyrely
But never mind, I fuly accept the statement the=at you are homopohobic and proud of it.
Exactly what was expected from someone who uses "bum chum" - in the hoes that peolple will be offended.
By the way, if you chek, you will find that epiphet and epithet are interchangeable in use.
Do you understand how Youtube workz yet?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Nice, you're getting worse,
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Starting to get to you now, LOL
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
I simply asked if you understand Youtube yet, or why you feel the use of "bum chum" is mature?
Why should that be a problem, you can answer why can't you.. or is it time for another tantrum?
You have stated that you are a homophobe with pathological tendencies and a fixation with genitalia- add that to your claim that Youtube is collaborating to falsify posts you don't like, and I think it illustrates my points nicely
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 LOL, I cant remember saying i had a fixation with genitalia, i think you are LYING again, Now are you going to make your mind up, am i homosexual or homophobic ?. you've tried both insults and they are not working so what next ?. let me remind you of some of other insults you have tried that haven't worked, pathological tendencies, playground flounce, immaturity, homoerotic fixation, delusional, immature playground posturing, unintelligible gibbering, ext ext, Keep it simple, PRICK.
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Ill tell you what i do know about YouTube, they allow you to block annoying little tossers like you, but i cant find anything about disposable accounts ?, Now why would YouTube allow you to make a disposable account so you can carry on annoying someone ?. are you saying this is YouTube's standard practice ?. if so, whats the point in blocking someone in the first place ?, + you don't have to put how old you are so why did you choose lie and say you're 38 ?.
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Now lets see, posting 3 videos just because you where wrong about the cycle path, sending me 100's of pointless comments, going through all my videos and comments, bringing up a comment i made to someone 5-6 months ago, making a second account because Ilko blocked you, just so you can send me more of your pointless comments, if this isn't stalking i don't know what is,
chew1047 1 year ago
Oh dear, mentioning insecurities and then illustrating perfectly Ascione's linking between abuse and insecurity,, boredom and a need to control wether they are unable to do so in their normal lives
As to joining you, no thanks - I have shown why you find it so exciting and fail to share your psychological needs, especially with something as inadequate as a .22 or similar, just doesn't float my boat!
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
Oh dear, those anger issues are really becoming a problem for you aren't they....
I suppose another playground flounce was to be expected, much easier than answering the actual questions?
You have "proved" nothing apart from my point about the connection beyween inadequacy, animal abuse, immaturity and anger issues
Couldn't have done better if I had tried!
By the way your homoerotic fixation with "Prick" and "Bum Chum" - something you want to tell us?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar,-- anger issues,--Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar,-- animal abuse, --Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar,--immaturity,--Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar,-- homoerotic fixation,--Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar,-- delusional,-- Is this the best you've got ?. ITS GETTING BORING. Go away LIER.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
1. Thought you weren't answering?
2. We are off in a spin - incoherent drivel, is this what they mean by incoherent rage?
3. Did you mean LIAR, or is LIER a new insult
All I did was ask why you found a fascination with homosexual epiphets as insults - I presume they were meant to offend, which means that you have a problem as you are either hompohobic, or trying to prove that you are, which is common in cases of denial.
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Did you mean epiphets or epithets ?, Did you mean hompohobic or homophobic ?, Did you mean wether or whether ?, Did you mean beyween or between ?. Whats is all this incoherent drivel ?, LOL, and you call me childish & immature, and as for "homosexual" i hate to disappoint you but im happily married with 3 great kids, typical foreign holiday once a year, half decent job, ext ext, If that makes me hompohobic, sorry i mean homophobic, then i must be, and proud of it.
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2" A second account with the same details, so when blocked, a disposable account can be created, but needs altered details" HA HA HA HA, What the fuck is this shit, LYING again,
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
What he fuck is this shit... it is your ignorance of the way Youtube works.
Why can't I create an identity called Chew 1047 with your details, it is because it is unique and cannot be reproduced. Therefore you alter the details (did you notice the 2 as in Pompeybike2) and alter the date of birth - this allows you to create an account that can be used for a specific account that you have been blocked and then disposed of .
Is this really too complicated
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 You must learn to live with your insecurities, you cant keep on lying to people, try being nice, try to find something other than YouTube, try trainspotting instead of stalking people, i like to go hunting (or abusing small animals if you prefer) it gets me out of the house and me and my mates get to kill things, it helps with my anger issues, you can come with us if you like. That would be fun don't you think ?.
chew1047 1 year ago
When you stated that my reply explaining the way that Youtube worked was"lying bullshit", you imply that Youtube must have collaborated with me in order for the annotations to be there.
Either that or your accusation that it lying bullshit is (ironically) in fact just that.....with such a poor level of understanding there is no point answering further until you clarify which one, as if I was lying then so was YouTube, or neither of us where
When you have clarified, I will answer.
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Yes i think you and YouTube collaborated with each other and come up with all the bull shit, OK, Now what ?. what the fuck you going to do now. If that's what you want to think its ok by me, Now answer this, do think answering a question is gloating ?. are you 38 or 55 ?. wheres that apology you claim to have made ?.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047 I think he's 65 with a mental age of 12, lol. just ignore the sad git, you will never get the truth out of a natural born liar.
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@ilkorocker No, i know ill never know if he's telling the truth or not, but it is amusing watching him try to twist and turn his why out of the hole he's dug himself, its better than watching coronation street anyway, LOL.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047 Anythings better than watching coronation street :), I'll have a look in my email inbox to see if i can find the comments he removed.
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@chew1047
Excellent - that is truly delusional especially the anger issues -"What the fuck are you going to do now?" is a good example
The apology has been addressed previously IRTDGTMPA...
As to age - do you know so little o the way Youtube works?
A second account with the same details, so when blocked, a disposable account can be created, but needs altered details .... simple for those with the most basic knowledge
Gloating? people can read for themselves and make up their own minds
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Fucking hell, that's amazing, LOL, you're good ill give you that, i suppose it;s years of bullshitting that get you this good, but bullshitting wont get you out of this one, you're just making yourself look a proper twat. keep it up, most entertaining.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
Its all there on this video and your channel.... Except the ones you removed of course, and the anger issues and maturity self evident
Shame Ilkorocker can't or won't justify his claim that pavements are laybys though.
Whereas I inquired from Nottingham City Council as to whether this was a cyclepath, I doubt he will do the same, and write to Portsmouth City Council state that he is wrong when the evidence comes forward.
There is the difference - I was wiling to do that
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar blar . What a fucking LYING little wanker you are. I've just had a look on your channel and its evident that this all you do, try to upset people, well its going to work with me, I've proven that your a LYING pathetic excuse of a man so don't bother replying because you wont get one back, now get on your push bike and fuck off, PRICK.
chew1047 1 year ago
I think that the constant use of obscenities, personal insults, immaturityand CAPITALS as validates the anger issues, don't you?
Making excuses such as "pest control" also fits into category 3 very nicely as well.
The gloating such as:
"Out of all the rats that I've shot i cant remember not seeing one twitch, but some do twitch more than others."
This certainly sounds as if you are getting off on the suffering..
Its all there to see - sounds as if you are in denial of your problem?
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 If you read it properly i was answering a question, now you have twisted it again, someone asked do they all twitch like that ?, and i answered them, hows that gloating ?. but if you want to think i have anger issues then feel free to do so, i don't care what you think, Now what about that apology on the cycle path and a footpath thing you got round your bollocks, i still cant find it ?, and the embarrassing claim of being 38 ?. you seem to keep forgetting them.
chew1047 1 year ago
"I deleted my reply because your getting boring, I've proven you're a LIAR, not much more i can do"
So it was such definitive proof that you were afraid to leave it up for scrutiny?
More likely you realised that your claims were becoming more outlandish and wanted them removed because you now find them embarassing (a wise decision on your part)
By the way do you mean:
"This may help you"
or
"This may be of help to you"
Your statement "This may help to you" doesn't make sense
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Well which is it 38 or 55 ?,By the way do you mean-embarrassing or embarassing,
chew1047 1 year ago
So, so sad.... I will simplify it even further for you....there are two alternatives
1.I was lying about Nottingham Cyclists post in which case Youtube is also lying by falsifying the "Comment removed"
2. The "Comment removed" on Nottingham cyclists post means I am telling the truth and you are posting rubbish
Which one?
What is really interesting is that you removed the posts below - I assume you realise just how stupid and infantile they were - please enlighten us as to why
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
You have failed to answer if Youtube is lying.... I have explained twice how Youtube works and the difference between "Comment deleted" and "Comment removed"
Despite the irrefutable evidence displayed by the annotation sysstem that the poster removed this (Nottingham Cyclist) you now claim that Youtube 's stated annotation system is "Bullshit" and that this is a lie.
Please explain why you are claiming that Youtube is lying to you... or do you really not understand how the annotation works?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
Comment removed
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
Why delete:
chew1047
Reply to your comment on: Why i hate cyclists.
@PompeyBike Now then lets see what you say Ive said now,1.YouTube 's stated annotation system is "Bullshit". ?, No i never said that, LYING again, 2. you are claiming that YouTube is lying to you, No, didn't say that one either, LYING yet again, What i have said is- you are a LYING little shit, trying to twist my words again, its going to work, and you have blocked me more than once, LIAR.... interesting
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Compulsive lying is a common disorder often caused by low self-esteem and a need for attention. Often, the liar does not realize how often he is lying because it becomes second nature or habit.Compulsive lying alienates friends and loved ones and often brings about the opposite of what the liar wants: instead of getting the attention they often crave, they end up pushing people away. With therapy, many people can overcome their compulsion to lie, This may help to you Pompey.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
You want to psychoanalyse?
Given your predilection for abusing small animals and posting the videos
David Milne Psychiatric News May 3, 2002
Volume 37 Number 9 Page 5
In his experience animal abusers come in three broad categories.
“First are people who are mentally ill, second are those who have serious anger-control issues, and third are those who are either not socialized or believe that animal cruelty is an accepted byproduct of some shady business practice”
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Back to that old chestnut, we're struggling now aren't we, LOL, I think when you say "abusing small animals" you mean killing rats, there's a big difference, Abusing small animals covers large variety of things, but i suppose it sound better to someone like you to twist it and put it that way, or you can't tell difference. who knows ?, who cares ?. and i find nothing embarrassing about speaking the truth, LYING about your age is embarrassing, saying your 38 when it should be 55,
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 38 or 55 ?, Which will he go for,
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
Again your ignorance of Youtube is showing.
Either wll do as the meaning is evident.. this is called a "typo" and is ssimply a keyboaardd sslip, as opposed to poor literacy and not understanding entire words such as "you're" instead of your.
Your repeated statement "You're video" which means "you are a video" is gibberish and has a completely different meaning of "your video" which I assumed you meant.
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 So are you now saying everybody that's posted videos of pest control on YouTube are not socialized or believe that animal cruelty is accepted or suffer from anger-control issues ?.what a strange person you are, all this because you cant tell the difference between a cycle path and a footpath, how sad are you, I've had a look and i cant find that apology anywhere ?, oh yes i forgot that you are a LYING little shit.
chew1047 1 year ago
Comment removed
chew1047 1 year ago
You asked the questions- I answered your questions, yet now you are throwing a little tantrum because the answer don't suit you!
The question you asked about blocking was:
Why have you blocked me AGAIN
I haven't blocked you AGAIN...
You were only blocked the once.... you didn't ask that
An absolutely truthful answer to your badly worded question!
If you posed more intelligibly as opposed to the playground posturing you would do better.
Am I supposed to be annoyed or upset by the names?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
Would that be the answer I gave explaining how Youtube works and that "Comment removed" means that it was removed means that it was removed by the poster whereas if I had removed it the report would read "Comment deleted"
I did not remove the comment and the evidence shows that this is the case. I can appreciate it is not the answer you want, but are you now saying that Youtube also lying as well?
Please tell me if I can make this simpler for you.
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike LOL, OK, Its obvious the truth is to beyond you, that's why you keep trying to twist what i say, but its not working, i know that you are a LYING little shit and you do. that's good enough for me, saying thing like- im denying things Ive never said, saying you have apologised and you haven't, saying you haven't blocked me and you have, the list is getting bigger all the time, not looking good is it Billy LIAR.
chew1047 1 year ago
@PompeyBike Chewy has deleted his reply to this:
chew1047
Reply to your comment on: Why i hate cyclists.
Now then lets see what you say Ive said now,1.YouTube 's stated annotation system is "Bullshit". ?, No i never said that, LYING again, 2. you are claiming that YouTube is lying to you, No, didn't say that one either, LYING yet again, What i have said is- you are a LYING little shit, trying to twist my words again,
His statements are below... unless he continues to delete his entries
PompeyBike2 1 year ago
@PompeyBike2 Are you some sort of fucking stalker, you sad fuck, you really need a new hobby, stalking is illegal,-I deleted my reply because your getting boring, I've proven you're a LIAR, not much more i can do, but thanks for re posting it for me because i stand by what i say, yet you still continue LYING, How old are you ?, is it 55 or 38 ? you cant help it can ya, LYING again, Now what about, "I apologised" did you for get about that one.
chew1047 1 year ago
So who wrote the two posts I quoted?
The name alongside them is yours, the content I quoted is your standard, yet you now deny writing it?
You really should read what you are putting on the site....
Please confirm that at no point did you write:
"why have you removed comments from one of you're sad videos which was from one of you're fellow bum chum cyclist"
"why did you remove you're fellow cyclists comment from you're video"
I would change your password if I were you!
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike Yes, I've asked you that same question twice ?. im not denying it and i never have, LYING again... you just cant help it can you,"why have you removed comments from one of you're sad videos which was from one of you're fellow bum chum cyclist"---"why did you remove you're fellow cyclists comment from you're video"--same question you thick twat, and then gave me one of you're LYING bullshit answers. Now what about, "I apologised" &," i haven't blocked you", try LYING out of that.
chew1047 1 year ago
Oh dear, oh dear poor little Chewy is getting confused ...
Your question was:
"why have you removed comments from one of you're sad videos which was from one of you're fellow bum chum cyclist"
. and repeated it :
"why did you remove you're fellow cyclists comment from you're video "
You then identified 5 days ago
I answered that - you have now changed the question to a comment on page 4 of this video!
Even simpler, connection failure and duplicate post removed
Going to change again?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike I think its you getting confused, read it again you thick twat, its reads 5 days ago, page 4 of this video, how did i change it from one to the other when its all in one sentence, LYING yet again, and as for,"connection failure and duplicate post removed", LOL, LYING again, page 4. of this video 6 days ago, i quote "I apologised" LYING again,... same page, i quote," i haven't blocked you",LYING again, you're nothing but a LYING low life.
chew1047 1 year ago
.. and still the immature playground posturing. Your knowledge of Youtube appears to be about the same as your knowledge of the Highway code!
The one from "Nottingham cyclist" was removed by himself - that is what the annotation means.
Introduced by YouTube in June 2009 the change means that the annotation is "Comment deleted" if deleted by the "owner" of the video and "Comment removed" if taken down by the person who posted.
Such ignorance.
PS - Its YOUR video not you're video!
Next?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike Comment removed, PompeyBike AKA Billy no mates or should that be Billy LIAR, 5 days ago, page 4 of this video. you're just a born LIAR, Am i still blocked by you or are you still LYING about that as well ?,
chew1047 1 year ago
Excellent - the predicted unintelligible gibbering.
1. You haven't been blocked "again"
2. Try 5 days ago - "I am awaiting a reply from the Engineering Department in Nottingham, which hasn't arrived, however if DF2's reply is correct then I will admit to being wrong"
3. I haven't
4. ... Seems your numeracy is on a par with your English as you counted 1,2,3,5!
5. Given your observation skills there would be no point in any subtle hints like the rain?
We await your next rant..... avoiding laybys
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike I've just tried commenting on one of you're sad videos and surprise surprise, I'm still blocked, you fucking LYING little shit, how can anyone believe a word you say.....LIAR.
chew1047 1 year ago
Excellent - the immature avoidance tactic (again), why not try answering the points raised?
Would either you or Ilko care to explain why you are still claiming the pavement in the video is a layby?
Explain which features inth evideo have led you to this decision (if you can)
Of course more of your trademark unintelligible gibbering is a more likely reply?
.. and you were doing so well and had even managed a couple of posts without obsenities as well!
Answer the question!
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike No, I'm explaining fuck all to a little wanker like you, but lets see if you have the bollocks to explain some things to me. 1. why have you blocked me again, 2. you said that you had apologised for you're fuck up on ilok's video, when was that then ?. 3. why have you removed some of you're comments from ilko's video ?. why have you removed comments from one of you're sad videos which was from one of you're fellow bum chum cyclist ? 5. did you get wet filming you're last video LOL.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
"No, I'm explaining fuck all to a little wanker like you"
That really translates as I can't so will avoid the issue with a few obscenities rather than explain why you cannot tell a footpath from a layby. You can't justify your claims and pathetically hide away behind insults instead
I don't really expect anything more from you, but it does prove my point about your claims.
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike A sad little prick and a LIAR, well done, you know and i know you blocked me. and like i said, I'm not explaining fuck all to a little LYING wanker like you, especially one that cant tell a footpath from a cycle lane. 5 days ago you removed one of you're rantings, it's there for all to see (comment removed) LIAR. and the one you have nicely avoided, why did you remove you're fellow cyclists comment from you're video ?. could you answer the question without LYING this time.
chew1047 1 year ago
The third of four videos is now up - showing clearly that Ilkorocker's claims about laybys are absolutely mistaken and absurd!
WE now have Google and a video proving him wrong, now do all his and Chewy's delightful comments are somewhat ironic..
Most ironic is Ilkorockers:
You should get your facts right before you shoot your big fucking mouth off, now shut the fuck up,
Shame he doesn't apply his own foul mouthed ranting?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
Comment removed
mko549 1 year ago
Next step Ilkorocker reply 2 - will he condemn car on pavements, or is it only just cyclists?
Bet we can guess the answer?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike Chew1047 is right, you are making yourself look a twat, keep it up, and yes i would condemn a car parked on a pavement, but i don't see what that's got to do with my video of a cyclist RIDING on the pavement ?. next question,
ilkorocker 1 year ago
@ilkorocker
How do you think the car got there - teleportation?
My apologies, the link wouldappear to be obvious, but seems to be beyond you. I had assumed that you would have realised that the car must have driven along the pavement to get to this position. Or are you going to claim teleportation, or magic?
Driving on the pavement and cycling on the pavement are both wrong, yet you seem to "Hate" cyclists for this, but don't seem to have a problem with motorists - why?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
Please see the preivous answer, but then again you have shown you don't understand pavements and cycle paths in the Pavement Driver video, why are you so afraid of explaining your comments?
You have been asked to explain a ludicrous suggestion on the Pavement Driver video and seem to be reluctant to do so - why?
... and you are not blocked from that video - please explain yourself (if you can)
PompeyBike 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PompeyBike You sad old loser.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047
Does that translate as I am not going to explain my comments on the Pavement Driver Video ?
PompeyBike 1 year ago
@PompeyBike LOOOOOOSER.
chew1047 1 year ago
@chew1047 To right,Pompeywanker is a sad little prick, i think i might block him and remove all his comments.
ilkorocker 1 year ago