IBM Measures The Force Required To Move Atoms

[axel714]

why IBM claims they got pictures of atoms?

and others build  a Large Hadron Collider to analyze it because is a fact that is impossible to see a atom

[CarCriticAssessor]

CONSIDER TOO: Nice marquee light of reality: LOL is right--nano-assembly inroads have been many, as well as the little perceived as correlative eg, J. Snider's 3-D {many Microsoft patents; super insightful in his own right}, and eg, light paths aka shadow informative dot | particle | energy account(s) & manipulation--for all manner of, ultimately, reality control, so to speak...protrusions & extrusions...& super fast...than the "speeds of light", re-emergence: horizons or already?

[Neutrinoghost]

And the amount of force is?

[TDudePro]

@Neutrinoghost it depends on the atom some are more massive than others

[Todd4921]

20 minutes later:

Hey guys you know if we got a bunch of these and put them together it would make a totally sweet bomb.

[tyebillion]

Yeah, but how long will it take to move billions of these to make a CPU?

[EdouardDubois]

@tyebillion

In order to make it sufficiently mass-producible you would need to use this technology to make nano-scale robots, or at least nano-scale manipulators. These would become the working force that construct nano-machines and nano-electronics in sufficient numbers for the whole thing to be economically viable.

[groundzerobuild]

MUSLIMS SCIENTIST HAVE ALREADY FOUND THE WAY TO MANIPULATE THE ATOM LONG BEFORE THE INFIDELS.THIS SHOWS ISLAM IS A WAY LIFE!ISLAM RULE THE WORLD

[Ishnuvalok]

@groundzerobuild Muslim Scientist. There's an oxymoron.

[TheThumper49]

@groundzerobuild  The only thing Islam rules the world in is head chopping and hissy fits.

[muzammilali007]

@groundzerobuild everything is in the quran,The Big Bang,The Big Crunch(even though it's not gonna happen since the discovery of Dark Energy), String Theory, The Membrane Theory, Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity and every discovery there ever will be. They just happen to tell you only after you discover it not before. ignorant morons

[swaize]

@muzammilali007 it doesn't though does it? I would be impressed if it said something like: "the nucleus of an atom consists of protons and neutrons, which in turn consist of sub atomic particles" but in fact it says "… Not even the weight of the smallest thing eludes your Lord, either on earth or in heaven. Nor is there anything smaller than that, or larger, which is not in a Clear Book. (Qur'an, 10:61)" Strong evidence!!!!

[skydome29]

@groundzerobuild I figured they'd be the first to splice the atom.

[coldarc]

science love to chop up reality in smaller and smaller pieces. the problem is when they try to cut an atom in half. reality begin to screw with the observer.

[skydome29]

@coldarc It's because with present measurement tools, when used to observe electrons, the photons interefere with the action of the electron; it's more an annoying fact than anything.

[aei05h1]

Replace the oscillating tip with an electro-magnetic beam + quantum computing + massive amounts of bandwidth to transfer a massive amount of data instantly + a fusion energy based powersource...............and you get a teleporter. :-O

I'm gonna go make one in the shed now!!!

I may die :(

[rfsent5]

lol, "the ipods", the most worthless of everything he mentioned. As if a music player is only an ipod. Yet the only thing that most people can relate to.

[AntonioDR88]

sum1 is gonna create lil robots that get into pls heads and kill from the inside YEAH !!!

[CamiloSanchez1979]

thanks IBM..do whatever it takes as long as we have easier and more advanced ways to access online porn..

[DrCowenstein]

@CamiloSanchez1979 screw porn, you can create an atomic reply of the actress with nanobots!

[SlyNine]

20 years ago they did have Cell phones and laptops...

[worseto]

so does this mean IBM will be able to improve my microwave meal.

[GanEdenAustralia]

IBM supported the Nazis

[WolYou]

Ford also supported the Nazis.

[RondoRaven]

Am I the only one that doesn't like the idea of nano-stuff? we have enough trouble with natural microscopic enemies

[b0utch]

@RondoRaven well that might be the best way to fight those microscopic ennemies :P the terminator of the nano tech you know ..... as long as they dont try to exterminate us :P

[RondoRaven]

at least the natural sort are autonomous! but I hate to be the alarmist so I digress

[koma312187]

For arguments sake, how do you expect to combat these microscopic enemies without nano-technology?

[RondoRaven]

I think everybody washes their hands at least every once in a while

[koma312187]

Washing your hands involves utilizing detergents which act upon bacteria on a molecular level which reaffirms my point.

[RondoRaven]

not really. washing of hands does not necessitate detergent simply running water over them removes much. in any case, detergent does not require advanced nanotachnology

[BountyHunter500]

1:04-1:20 brünooooo xD same voice loool

[Icarusdecending82]

Awesome! Im so proud of these guys! Im glad im only 27 and will be able to see this stuff in action when im 50.

[razor71927]

Unless something happens to you?

[Icarusdecending82]

@razor71927 The odds are I will live to be at least 78. My grandfather lived to be 84 and he was a chronic smoker since he was 13...im not really worried.

[razor71927]

Then if you are not "worried" as you say, you will be missing out on all the things you would want to see.

Sounds like you ARE really worried!

[Icarusdecending82]

@razor71927 Im confused...what am I supposed to be worried about?

[razor71927]

About your Mortality!

[Icarusdecending82]

@razor71927 maybe sometimes I am.

[SouthCentralTee]

useful.. ;)

[1888junkteam]

excellent work!

[squadleaderAlfa]

and upload it on you iphones batteryplug

or on you blood or on your tonenail

even on the nail of your future

[squadleaderAlfa]

your calibration instruments have been manipulated to protect the technology,

ill give them to you cause trying to crack them will cause timereflux, conditional realityparsing, retrievalinhibition and extractionpprotocols forever changing the metafysical position of mater and consequentially its relations in open and closed systems.

ps. i can put a zillion gig on a CD-ROM

[zwazii]

mind = blown

[ExNihiloJimmy]

fuck yea

[nanogirl]

Wonderful work!

[Colombian459]

That's amazing.

[crzyJen71]

you think i dont know somtime in the future they'll invent somthing that like telekeneses

power or somthing if they can do that obviously they might invent somthing like that

[xgotarox]

...they can't "invent" telekinesis.. it's an imaginary force. do you think someone invented gravity? electricity? magnetism?

[letmeinnowdamit]

does wiki also help you to spell the word knowledge?

[basschic40]

aha good one

[iggy4323]

Hahahahah

[twistedhairball]

Wiki is the sum of all human knoledge.

[WOMP2007]

bare this in mind, science fiction that isn't stupid is usually the base for the future, check out Ghost in the Shell Stand Alone Complex and the movies, re watch Blade Runner. The premises come before the reality, always.

[earthaltar]

You should also mention Gene Roddenberry. By the way the original title of the book from which Blade Runner was taken is called "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep". The same author of "A Scanner Darkly". I believe his last name was Dick. A paranoid schizo who commited suicide. Intelligence can drive some people mad.

[WOMP2007]

i don't know what caused what exactly, but watch the new blade runner doc dangerous days, its 3.5 hours long, there are also lots pf pkd interviews

[amadeusk331]

The internet WAS military...The goverment originally developed it to allow communications between military installations that possessed nuclear weapons...The whole paranoid mindset that the Cold War disputes started. I guess something good came out of it; if it wasn't for a paranoid government, there would be no internet. Either that, or someone else would have invented it.

[devonrose742]

IBM is always a step ahead of all the other companies (dell, HP, apple, gateway etc..)

I can't wait to see how IBM will revolutionize technology 20 years from now.

[adorianvlad]

Yes, laptops, I-pods etc but many authors have

speculated in the past that, by now, we would have individual mini-helicopters and other such things. Only a few percent of the

technological ideas will eventually become reality in the near future. The rest of them are just science fiction...

[maxx666mayhem]

Wow!

[techdawg667]

now we have to wait about ten years for the technology to show up in the consumer market...

[2007ASpaceOdyssey]

but about 10 minuets until its integrated for military use

[techdawg667]

still it takes like years. the military is experimenting with laser weapons now (it'll be hilarious if it was inspired by Star Wars!) and Popular Science mag says it won't come out till 2010 or later. even the intenet took 2 years to be public...and it wasn't military.

[Prz3mK0]

Did you just say that the Internet wasn't military and that it evolved into today's Web in 2 years? Man, this is dangerous. Some people could die from excessive laughter, and some from a nervous breakdown.

[techdawg667]

It wasn't TOTALLY miltary. They had little involvment though. It was originally a system set up by a unviersity that I forgot so they can share information with other universities quickly. They found it so useful they made it public. The masses were slow to adapt, when real changes started in the mid 1990s. Then the "Information Boom" began, and later the ".com Boom" and later inevidably the ".com Crash"

[Prz3mK0]

Yeah, involvement so little that even today's routing protocols can compensate for nuclear strikes on network nodes. Army boys split from arpanet after "just" ten years since its launch, and that was in 1983. Check the wikipedia at least, pls.

[thomasstunts]

Recently, my World Lit professor told us how the internet was originally designed by scientists to transport vast amounts of info to each other that was absurd to transport otherwise. I do not know if that was any military relation. Also, in terms of academie, please refrain from using Wikipedia. Anybody can get on there and edit whatever they want, as it's not peer reviewed and thus, not accurate or credible. However, it's not bad to check out the sources listed.

[Prz3mK0]

So how about the Internet Society's site? Check their 'Brief history of the Internet' and highlight all the instances of 'DARPA'. It will shine like a X-mas tree. And yes, everyone can write whatever he wants in the Wikipedia. However there is verification system in place, and Wikipedia's quality rivals that of Encyclopedia Britannica.

[thomasstunts]

I will check out that website.

I disagree with you about the quality of Wikipedia rivaling that of Encyclopedia Britannica, as Wikipedia is seriously frowned upon by university standards, and there must be a good reason for that. I am obviously ignorant to your level of education, but it has been in my experience that even the mere mention of Wikipedia in the academic field is laughable. Actually, it is recommended to avoid most of the internet for info, unless using registered journals.

[Prz3mK0]

I seriously doubt your statement about education levels (;. As far as academics foes - where I live it can be so conservative community. They don't like any challenges to their authority, even from their own field. They fight with their 'competitors' (other scientists, whole universities...) and their 'offspring' (students, grads, friends - you name it). I'm afraid it can be universal. Citing Wikipedia in a science paper surely is a sub-standard practise. Using it for research - surely not.

[B4TT3RY]

Star Trek did it first.

[techdawg667]

no, Simpsons did it!!!

[bavb]

love it!