"At the end of the day", "Ummmmm", "Curtail", "Uhhhhhhh, "At the end of the day", complete inability to articularte, "At the end of the day" - common excuses this twat uses to justify voting for evil. Seriously, expand your vocabulary! RON PAUL 2012.
You like Occupy and civil liberties but you excuse "The Obama" for signing the NDAA. You respect liberties so long as they only apply to people with whom you agree. Will you be o.k. when they start marching the Occupiers into indefinate detention facilities? I'd bet you would buy an "Obama" justification of such a violation but scream like hell if it was a Republican initiative. You're either lyin' to me or your lyin' to yourself. Enjoy freedom of speech while still you can. Ron Paul 2012!
@Reido2828 This just goes to show how lame you fanatics are. You guys always dismiss criticism against your messiah from liberals as obama supporters lashing out against him. If you actually paid attention to the consensus who view Seder's vids, then you would know that many of them don't like Obama and would actually like a real progressive in office instead of the pseudo-progressive we have now.
I'm not a fanatic supporter nor am I American. I am simply spreading Paul's message and much of what was said about him in this video is a tad distroted. A lot of Paul's supporters are radical but he has given people a strong message and hope. Many progressives are so unaware of the many problems the country faces. Also, many are unaware of Ron Paul's predictions in the past. he has been dead on with so many issues over the last 15 years, that it boggles the mind
"At the end of the day"... ur a moron and understand nothing RP says and if you say u don't have to defend your vote for obama you arejust plain stupid because Obama did nothing he promised and your voting him to the Office a 2nd Time ?!
I uh think uh that uh we uh should uh. Words are your tools if you want to make money off your thoughts. Can you say 3 sentences without saying uh uh uh uh uh? You fucking clueless idiot.
FDA is good? Aspartam, Fluoride, Mercury, Prozac and GMO food good? Good appetite - LOL. EPA should waste tax payer's sour earnt on Global Warming bs??? Ron Paul won't end the wars but RA would - WTF are you talking about? Get your ass into your car to get an abortion done in a state where it's legal or is this too unconveniant?
@teedonster2 so you want to die and and destroy the world because that is what will happen if ron paul is president he will get rid of the EPA making it so we dont have any healthy foods and the FDA making it so we dont know what meds are compatable or what the side effects of meds are and then he will make you starve to death by going on the gold standered and he will kill your parents by demolishing the entitlement programs
The founding fathers wern't gods, and the Constitution is an imperfect document written at a time when the most cutting edge medical device was the leech.
So if this guy thinks the NDAA stripped his rights, what is he wasting his time asking Sam who he likes in 2012? If these people actually think NDAA has stripped their rights, they sure have rolled over on it. Where are they protesting? filing lawsuits?
Do you really need an EPA that outrageously LIED about 911 dust toxicity? They called it harmless when in actuality it was FULL of mercury and asbestos. They urged New Yorkers to go back to their offices and shops and not to worry. I CANNOT forgive the EPA for this gross breach of their duty. They were formed to PROTECT our health and yet they sent thousands more to a slow sick death in announcing it was safe. People DEPEND upon their expertise. They betrayed a sacred trust.
lol Ron Paul just likes to follow the constitution. These other past presidents has thrown the constitution out the door. That about abortion shouldn't be used as a form of birth control. Women should think before they get a penis in their vagina. Abortion is about killing a life. Furthermore if a men are forced to pay child support. Than they should have the right to stop a women from getting an abortion. Men have babies too. Women should only have abortion if raped or if she could die.
@o0PocoMax0o your an idiot a woman choosing to have an aboriton is her consitutional right and the surpreme court said so and what morons like you dont understand is that ron paul isnt going to make the government smaller he is just going to switch were the government has controll so no more FED but the IRS will be in a womans womb and why dont you be for all males needing to get vacetomys and most woman will die if they cant get a safe legal abortion duh
@kazooga1234 Why am I an idiot? Because some women can't keep their legs closed. Using abortions as birth control. Instead of using contraception? Having tax payers pay for plan parenthood. Money that the United States don't have. Now who is the idiot me, or the women that don't use contraception. Oh if you have it your way. You will have tax payers pay for abortions whether they like it or not. Ron Paul smaller government and less spending.
@o0PocoMax0o you are the idiot because you dont get that woman will DIE IF THEY DONT GET TO HAVE ABORTIONS and you fucking said that woman should be able to get abortions in the case of DEATH but now you are fucking taking that back and i have every right to call you an idiot FOR TRYING TO TAKE AWAY MY CONSTUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A SAFE LEGAL ABORTION and you act as if MALES DONT WANT FEMALES TO HAVE ABORTIONS when its most of the times males making females get abortions and
@kazooga1234 It's ok to debate me. But please don't insult me directly. I'm just debating. My comments are not directed at you personally. It's directed at the few. The words I use were proper. So please refrain from calling names like, " You idiot" and so forth.
@o0PocoMax0o (continue) what you should be fighting for is for ALL MALES TO HAVE TO HAVE VACTOMYS THEN after all they are the ones that PUSH the females to have sex with them AND RON PAUL ISNT FOR SMALLER GOVERNMENT YOU MORON he is just for switching what the government does he wants to make it so government is the same size but instead of having cops like the EPA and FDA he wants IT IN A WOMANS WOMB SO THEY DONT HAVE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A SAFE LEGAL ABORTION
At 4:30 When He says, "He just doesn't like Federal Authority" - He is right! but then the next sentence is, "he just doesn't have a problem with a lot of these things" - That's wrong. Ron Paul doesn't endorse racism. It would be a terrible business practice this day and age. Ron Paul doesn't endorse discrimination, drug use, etc.. Ron Paul is the best choice for President this election.
Never mind that he just signed a statute to have the military nab people with no charge, no warrant, no contact with a lawyer, no contact with family, and send them out of the country for as long as he wants.
Never mind that he's the first president to have two Americans killed by executive order, one of them 16-years-old.
He is literally a murdering dictator, but you just can't seem to internalize such a starkly obvious fact.
@BenjiREC Reducing the debt is not going to help the economy. Read anything by Keynes or Paul Krugman. We need more spending to get the economy going. Lastly, I agree with you on ending the Fed, it's a damn rigged casino. Read Matt Taibii's Griftopia for more on that. And yes, let's end these damn wars (but in Africa? - don't you mean the middle east?)
@BenjiREC Okay, but I don't think those are most important issues facing our country. I guess that's where we disagree. When you say the constitution is important, that would probably mean that you and Paul would oppose the appointment of Rich Cordray on the Consumer Financial Watchdog position because it's "more gov't." We need this position to fight for the people against the financial corporations that hold all the power in Congress. more to come...
Ron Paul understands that the 14th Amendment applies the rights guaranteed within the Constitution to the individuals within the states. He doesn't say that state oppression is OK.
I find it strange that you would vote for Obama even after he's been a huge failure. Personally I can't think of one election promise he has fulfilled. Wars/Spending/Stripping of liberties have all increased drastically under his watch. Where's the "Change?"
Even more odd is your reasoning that you'd vote for him mainly because he supports "a women's right to choose" yet he has stripped all liberties/freedoms from every American (men and women) with the NDAA. Much more concerning in my book
Why is Ron Paul even still running? If Fox, conservative radio hosts, and ~75% of the Republican party aren't behind him he can not possibly win. I like Ron's idea that we should get out of the wars for the sake of our troops and the health of our economy. However, his ideas on basically gutting our federal government, EPA, FDA, letting the states dictate women's reproductive rights and gay rights and totally letting the markets and corporations run wild are simply unacceptable.
The NDAA has stripped all American of their Constitutional Bill of Rights and OBAMA did it. This is treason and tyranny! What good is it that all people are treated equal in a Tyranny? Perhaps people on the left should look up that video of the North Koreans fake crying over their dear leader's death. I bet you those people have equal civil rights...ie. the right to be miserable.
If my state wants to death penalize drug offenders, he'll let them do it. Does that old loon still think he could persuade congress to get on commodity currency ?
@maozebong100 Do you think the people of your state would vote for such a measure? You act as if the "state" will just dictate and decide without putting it to a vote...
@hmfmi - You may live in a progressive state - but keep in mind there are states that elect loons like Brewer, and elect sheriffs like Joe AreAPieHole. There is zero doubt that states rights, when it comes to civil rights would triumph - if you'll recall, we sort of had a civil war over that issue.
@47f0 What do you consider a progressive state? I'm anti big government consolidation of power. The larger the government and broader the scope of power, the more incentive their is for lobbying and corruption. Civil liberties are sacrificed for "the greater good of the nation", it's happening in the EU as we speak and is contrary to a free society.
The civil war was much deeper than you elude to. States rights = slavery is so engrained in peoples minds it's sad, just as sad as slavery.
@BenjiREC The executive branch is operating way out of it's authority too, I'd say even more so.
Congress is the voice of the people, or supposed to be, and therefore should have the most power in my opinion.
The Executive branch is not supposed to have the power to do what we've seen both Bush and Obama get away with...but congress is complacent and handing over their/our powers to the executive branch AND the Federal Reserve.
With the NDAA in effect maybe a President Santorum will deem all abortion doctors, and women who have abortions a threat to national security and arrest them.
@hmfmi "...the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God..." That 's not the christian god, nor is "creator" defined as a being. Now, where do those words appear in the U.S. Constitution? You know, our founding document.
States do not have the right, nor should they, to deny "equal protection of the laws" (Amend. 14).
It's not about federal power, it's about constitutional rights and protections.
@YY4Me133 What is a creator if not some sort of entity? Is an entity not a being? I'm not arguing the case of the existence of God, only that the country was founded with a spiritual belief system allowing us to believe what we want, Atheism etc.. If you remove "the creator" etc.. then you remove the basis for the rights proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence, you know, the founding document which preceded the constitution. Both to restrain govt and maximize freedom.
Constitutional rights and protections are there precisely to curb federal power. Federal power is explicitly outlined in the constitution- the 3 branches. All powers not enumerated are reserved to the respective states or to the people... (Amend. 10).
And the power to enforce the 14th amend which you cite, falls with congress' not the executive branch.
The age old argument and it seems the anti-federalists concerns were valid. Presidents are becoming monarchs (shrug)
So this moron thinks federal abortion laws are more important than having constitutional rights.
I guess its ok thousands are dieing in wars and are being tortured, and that we have lost are constitutional right to have a trial by jury. Progressive would rather we all lived in slavery than have a woman go to another state to get an abortion.
@Ejwoods08 Tell me what rights do you have when you can be arrested by the military and have no right to a trial? The NDAA takes all rights away if it is ever to be abused the President and military can literally arrest who ever they deem a threat.
The federal govt. isn't being run by the Constitution, rather, it is being run by bankers who have been given the ability to control society and the govt. through the use of "legalized" counterfeit money.
In short, if you support big govt. you are supporting big globalist corporations because that is who is running "our" govt.
End the "fed" reserve and you end big globalist corps running your govt. Vote Ron Paul to end the "fed" reserve, vote Ron Paul to end globalist corp. occupation.
@jeff4justice you do realize that if he doesn't sign it, it goes into law by default? And if he vetoes it, that congress can override his veto? If the worst is bound to happen, he might as well not give congressional republicans an opportunity to cast him as uncooperative and soft on terror.
Since congress has the lowest approval rating and the tea Party and Occupy are pissed at the government now is the time for an alternative party movement.
EPA and FDA when the 2party system puts corporately controlled tools in those agencies.
Your system will not change regardless of who sits in the White House, until you remove the puppeteers that control it. Its not even a government. Theyre simply a buffer between the people & the money - someone for you to blame when things go south.
And youve allowed this puppet govt to take your freedom, based on world security, via fake terrorism. The people with the money know, that gold is not the metal of choice yet, its lead in the shape of ammo. Next up, the Enemy Expatriation Act.
As for Ron Paul I've never really thought of government as the boogey man that people like Ron Paul seem to think of it as.The idea that you will get rid of all regulatory departments, squash Dept of Education, etc seems to me to be going backwards not forward.
@gamesmaster35 Watch Nobel prize winning economist Milton Friedman's series called "Free to Choose" from 1980 here on youtube. It's 10 episodes, each deals with an issue we're facing and discussing today. For the first 30 mins Friedman makes his case through a documentary style film. For the last 30, he discusses/debates with people from both sides of the argument. Skip to the second half if you like... but the conversation they engage in is extremely interesting.
It not just that RP's philosophies would allow states to discriminate against African Americans rather some areas would discriminate against Hispanics, immigrants, Muslims, women, etc..our country would no longer be the "united" States of America rather separate states with separate laws. Laws that allow discrimination that I do not agree with. There would be civil unrest and chaos.
@golden454 That's inaccurate, the constitution would still take precedence... It's the other, more divisive issues that would be up to the states. And by states I mean citizens like you and I, deciding what's best for our state, rather than some special interest group in DC, miles away, telling us what's best for us. Issues like Medicinal marijuana, same sex marriage, abortion, etc... Rest assured, that would be much better than having a bad law govern the whole nation
@BenjiREC Fair enough. I've thrown quite a bit at you. Can I ask you why you are supporting Ron Paul then? I obviously need serious convincing that he's not going to take us to a regressive or reactionary governing position. Can you convince me otherwise? Are you a single-issue voter?
@PompousPreacher So if I could give you examples of Carbon-14 dating being very badly off in dating methods....Would that work for ya? Would you still proclaim it's accuracy?
Still not sure where ya got that the world was created during the bronze age or where ya came up with the 98000 years prior to creation or where ya came up with the creator being a Caucasian male...DNA and the fossil record do not evidence Evolution...They pretty clearly reject it.
Sam looks at what problems exist today and falsely blames them on a free market capitalistic system. His dooms day scenario for deregulating the markets is that if we do, things will get worse, when in reality, the deregulation libertarians advocate only evens the playing field. We don't have a free market right now. We've got corporate control over government influencing legislation that stifles competition in THEIR favor.
That quote wasn't something I made up. I pulled it right from his videos. A free market doesn't benefit the "powerful." His idea of powerful is wealthy. A truly free market without government intervention benefits the innovative and competitive, and ultimately the consumer. Undefeatable monopolies are made only with government intervention, and a monopoly occurring in a free market will inevitably fall to competition.
@chronDiggity I hope you realize that your apologetics betray the contradictions of your economic ideology. The worst parasites that feed at the government trough are NOT welfare queens, the unemployed or the elderly; they are big business and corporations. They are the ones who have lobbied for their monopolies. Your non-interventionist theories make you believe that this behavior will magically stop; it won't. The only way to ensure a truly free market is to abolish the corp as a legal entity.
You think libertarians expect everyone to go back to their corners and play nice once we UNDO all the corruption they've spend BILLIONS on for years and years? Of course not.
That's not the point, however. The straw man argument presented by liberals is that libertarians want to deregulate in a way to FURTHER that level of unfair favoritism for those already at the top.
@gnomechomskylives You're acting much smarter than you actually are; if you think for one second, that big corporations would be better off under a Ron Paul administration, then you're so ignorant that I don't think it's worth wasting my time trying to educate you on our current system of government.
@gnomechomskylives A truly free market is absolutely impossible to attain, corporations or not. The market cannot be free without perfect availability of information, which is impossible to ensure.
@viliphied In order to have a free market, you must first have a sound monetary system. If some people are given the ability to cheat the system by being able to create money from nothing, then the system has been controlled by unelected dictators, not "free markets".
Through the practice of "fractional reserve banking" and removing the gold standard, certain unelected people have gained monetary control of society through fraud.
Simply put, in a free market no one can shit gold bricks.
@viliphied Yet the "free-er" the market, the "free-er" the people and the more opportunity people have. When restrictions, regulations, tariffs, etc.. are implemented, special interests line up to buy influence and lobby government to pass laws that benefit themselves and create obstacles for competitors (Monsanto?). That's what happens when you give government the power to decide and dictate... The free market is the best anti-monopoly system, far from perfect though.
@chronDiggity No, the quote probably wasn't. Your response was that Sam blames the social problems that exist today on free market capitalism, whereas he isn't; he's saying they would be just as/more prevalent in a free market capitalist system.
He's said before that a free market capitalist system doesn't exist, so I have no fucking idea where you are getting this whole "he blames inequality that exists today on free markets" shit from.
First of all, here's the actual quote: "Sam looks at what problems exist today and falsely blames them on a free market capitalistic system."
I don't know why you injected something I never said.
Secondly, there's more than social problems resulting in corporate communism. Here's a blatant one: Health insurance. I mean literally, people are dying and they are making record profits, sending prices artificially up. This isn't the result of free market.
@chronDiggity Okay, I thought you said he was blaming inequality on a free market because I was talking about it before you said that. My mistake, but you were still saying that he blamed problems that exist TODAY on a system which he doesn't even believe exists. That was my point and it went way over your head.
And yeah, I'm not in favour of the US health care system, and I think there are better ways to provide it. e.g. the NHS in Britain.
A centralized system is definitely better than an entire industry build around federal immunity from competition. Look up the McCarran Ferguson of 1945. 60 years of federal immunity from competition has left the insurance companies giant, and without competition, they've been allowed to LITERALLY get together and collectively set pricing. If the free market had not been bastardized by government intervention, health care reform wouldn't even be an issue.
I said health care reform wouldn't be an issue, meaning there would be no reason to reform it. The prices wouldn't be inflated, they'd be competitive.
I'm sure, given the state of our political system, we would still have government insurance for those who absolutely can't afford it and need it but it wouldn't be the kind of burden we see today with medicare and medicaid.
I'm speaking as a realist. We would still have those things because we would still have people who use the government to create such things. They simply wouldn't as big of a burden. Not saying it's my stance, just what I would expect America to look like in this alternate reality.
@tru abortion is in the consitution the surpreme court says so and if you want the proof to that i have it and its not murdering a child not allowing a woman to have an abortion is murdering females as well as whats inside of her because females use coat hangers to have miscairages as well as do crackcocain and other drugs and end up having a crack baby that nobody will adopt but that baby will have to suffer for a day and die anyways so the mother went through that pain for nothing
@someguy6978 abortion isnt murder not when geraiffes eat plants to have a misscairage as well and when a woman gets pills off line or does meth/crackcoacain and other drugs to have a misscairage and then has the baby and its still born or only lives for a fucking day why the hell should a woman have to go through that pain and nobody adopts crack babys and they will be a lot of crack babys if not worse thats why abortion is in the constitution and the FED controls the millitary
@kazooga1234 A matter of opinion then since I believe There's a difference between US and Animals and you apparently don't but "Abortion rights do give extra Privileges to woman which is Unconstitutional as well....A woman can decide whether or not to keep the baby while the man has no say in it yet if the woman decides to keep the baby, the man is bound by law to support the kid....The Federal reserve does not control the military. The Federal reserve is a privately owned bank.
abortions r part of the consitution the sepreme court has said so many times and i can prove that and people r animals stupid to be more exact we are primates and primates are a type of monkey and that also explains why idiots like you dont understand that a fetus that is unwanted is just a parasite i bet you wouldnt be going ya lets make it so every single male has to have a vactomy after all thats not in the consitution why dont you be for that instead of weman killing themselves
@kazooga1234 Disagree entirely since I don't attend the church of Evolution nor do I worship at the altar of Time and if ya look through the comments here, you'll notice someone else was trying to "debate" the subject of evolution as well...So now you support Women retaining the ability to have kids and Men giving up that right?
Really?
What you introduce is blatantly unconstitutional and you appear to be saying..."My rights as a Woman are more important than the rights of men"..I disagree again
@someguy6978 you are saying facts arent true well here is a fact for you wimp(dot)com(slash)niceinfo its called evolution for dummys maybe you will learn something about facts and about how bats are birds you fucking moron that doesnt even understand that a womans right for her to do what she wishes to is in the constitution when i can prove that a million times over thanks to the supreme court and their rulings
@kazooga1234 I'm saying what you claim to be facts can easily be shown to be false....Easily...You're spouting quite a bit of nonsense...Easily disproved nonsense.
Go to Ron Paul's website and see for yourself what he believes and quite spouting rhetoric you hear from your local msm pundit.
@someguy6978 what i am saying are 100% facts because i can prove them with links and i dont need to see ron pauls lieing page where he puts only what he wants idiots like you to see i have actually read through all of his speeches and i have heard all of his speeches and he has said millions of times demolish all of the FED even when cenk asked if it was just the reserve he said the FED as in all of it so maybe you should listen to him talk more
@kazooga1234 Using examples in a corrupted country is pretty laughable....i can give you a specific example of almost all 10 of the bill of Rights being violated....Even though they are explicitly and specifically stated as residing inside us and are NOT Governable unless we choose to allow them to be...Do you understand the implication of that statement?
The Bill of rights isn't something the Government "lets us do" it's an area where the Government has NO Authority as per the Constitution.
@s america was perfectly fine under bill clinton and we had the FED and he got us out of debt as well as the EPA and FDA and everything under clinton worked perfectly well so the corrupt system isnt because of the stuff we have its because its not being used properly and just because something is broken doesnt mean we cant fix it and demolishing it will only make things worse and i can prove that and i am for everybody having constitutional rights and abortion is in the constitution
@kazooga1234 Please, I beg of you; better to let others think you're a fool and remain silent rather than speak and remove all doubt. Your English grammar, spelling and sentence structure is beyond poor and you're making all of us who are pro-choice look bad through association.
@gnomechomskylives the punctuation takes up spaces thats why i dont use them but i can prove what i am saying so i dont make the people who are for woman to be able to get safe legal abortions look bad i have 100s of links saved in my favs
@kazooga1234 Heh believe me, I know what it's like to run out of space. But that's why you need to edit and revise. Just try to use *some* punctuation and clearer language otherwise people you're arguing against will sound "smarter" by comparison. Sorry to criticize you but it needs to be said.
@gnomechomskylives i never use punctuation in the comment section i only use it in PMs and those ron paul loving morons will never be smarter then me because they cant prove anything they say they just think the lies the believe are real and dont know the facts but i have them all saved
@kazooga1234 The supreme court in the late 1890s said seperate but equal was ok and congress passed laws that said blacks were only 3/5 of a person. None of that made it right. Again Margaret Sanger loving ProgressaCunts like you thinks its trendy to murder yours babies, especially if they are black. So thats your rationale. So I will worry about the financial crisis the NDAA, TSA, and endless wars. ProgressaCunts need to get your priorities straight.
@truthout911 yes and then that got undone and the surpreme court agrees that a black person is a whole person unlike with what ron paul is saying ron paul thinks that a black person is still 3/5 of a person and thats 1 of the main problems with ron paul and with your last thing about NDAA and TSA thats why i am doing a write in vote for alan grayson because he wont kill people like ron paul will there are only a few cercumstances were i wont be voting for grayson for 2012
@kazooga1234 Give me a break with your Alan Grayson. ProgressaCunts like you are so dumb with your koolaid of your fantasy of socialism. First off Grayson voted while he was in congress for every military appropriations bill plus he said we could continue pentagon spending while pandering to idiots like you about socialism. RP is the only one who will repeal the NDAA, the patriot act and bring the troops, and that is based on his record, not HOPE AND CHANGE that Obamaniods promised
@truthout911 alan grayson actually wants to help people he got the FED audited and you have no idea how much he is against NDAA and how much he wanted to have a public option that was just an option and if you didnt want it it wouldnt have been something you paid for and there wasnt going to be a fine and the supreme court does make decisions about the consitution you are just to fucking stupid to actually do research about that and there are only republicunts not progessive ones
@kazooga1234 Alan Grayson was one of the ones R Emanuel blackmailed to take the teeth out of RP original audit Fed bill, plus RP has bill dealing with this issues for some 30 old yrs Greyson is a johnnie come lately. Again Greyson likes to run his mouth and pander to useless ProgressaCunts like you, but when it comes to doing something, he is no action. Oh and public option, he voted for Obamacare. ProgressaCunts love being pandered too.
@kazooga1234 The fucking moron is you, because your last statements make absolutely no sense. My point in using the term ProgressaCunt is to point out the behavior. Truth is their are just as many NeoCunts as well Just like both parties alike who voted for the NDAA, so to act like ProgressaCunts are angels, you are being played for a fool and you will never see the whole picture.
what you are saying isnt true at all you dont understand that the republicunts actually want to take away peoples rights and that bill got passed because of the republicunts and you think that ron paul is any different when he is going to take away womans constitutional rights as well as allow corps to make it so blacks have to enter certain stores some ways and whites another way if they want to you are a fucking moron not me and i can prove what i am saying you cant prove jackshit
@kazooga1234 What rights do the "republicunts" want to take away? Black, white, gay, straight, isn't the issue, it isn't about group rights or collective rights, it's about individual rights. And if you DO want to talk about "group rights" what about Men's rights? Men have no say when it comes to abortion, they have to pay to support a child even if they dont want it, and they cant compel a woman to have it and pay child support for the man to raise the baby... is that just?
@hmfmi try the womans constitutional right to have a safe legal abortion or the right for gays to adopt children those rights and also the right for gays to be married and they also want to make government bigger to make sure that woman arent getting abortions
@kazooga1234 Oh you mean like all of the ProgressaCunts in the congress and Senate who voted for the NDAA along with the Neocunts. Progressives like Carl Levin. Again you drink the koolaid of ProgressaCuntism. Ron Paul has a record of action to run on, all Grayson has to run is his big mouth. Again to Margaret Sanger loving liberals like you and Sam its trendy and hip to kill you baby, especially if its black. But of course you love Obama's Libyan policy so its not a suprise
@kazooga1234 Oh btw lets not forget the ProgressaCunts along with the Neocunts who voted for the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, the FISA Act, ObamaCare. and I could go on. The point is there is no difference between them, but you are too stupid to see that. Thats why Sam likes useful idiots like you to listen to his stupid show,. You just mouth ProgressaCunt talking pts.
@kazooga1234 and my point in bring up those decisions and laws was to say because congress or the supreme court says something, doesnt make it right. Just like Roe v Wade, even the woman whose case it involved has come out and said that it was a bad decision and has regretted was she did, but abortion is not my issue. Again ProgressaCunts need to get their priorities straight. Funny you cared about ending wars when Bush was in. Oh I guess its not their CAUSE CELEB anymore
the progressives didnt vote for the PATRIOT ACT it was actually all of the republicans russ fiengold fillibustered the hell out of it and alan grayson hated it and wasnt in office at the time that was being shoved through when A REPUBLICUNT SIGNED IT INTO EFFECT but your stupid brain doesnt remember any of that so it shows that there are only republicunts and any sellout democrat isnt a progressive you moron beause progressive means change things for the better like grayson wants to
@kazooga1234 Oh yes they did, only one senator didnt, and it enjoyed a good number ProgressaCunt congress votes too. Just like all of the other liberty stealing legislation. ProgressaCunts and Neocunts work together. They pretend to fight but they are on the same team. Only morons like you cant seem to understand that.Grayson talks a good game and thats all he can do. Again actions speak louder than words. Except to Zombie ProgressaCunts like you.
@truthout911 and bernie sanders voted no i dont think he fillibustered the hell out of it and he is a progessive still in congress and it shows that you dont even pay attention to the FACT THAT THE REPUBLICUNT BUSH COULD HAVE VETOED THE BILL BUT WANTED TO PASS IT and you are the moron for thinking that republicans are better then democrats when it was a democrat who fillibustered the hell out of it and alan grayson actually wants to tax the top 1% and balance the budget
@kazooga1234 Sanders voted against the NDAA but he didnt try to fillibuster it, it was Rand Paul who try to, plus introduce an amendment to gut the teeth out of it to arrest citizens.. Plus Obama wanted the right to arrest citizens. A true PROGRESSACUNT. Much like FDR who arrested Japanese. As I said before there is no difference between the two, its you who thinks they are. Both supported it in unison. And Grayson is just running his big mouth and pandering to idiots like you.
@truthout911 we werent talking about the NDAA and there was one thing that bernie sanders did fillibuster and nobody else did and he even went on a hungery strike for it so it shows how stupid you and and obama isnt a progessive you fucking moron he is a republican just like the rest of the republicunts you cant name one progessive thing he has done while he was in office because he was to busy listening to those morons you love so much so you should love obama too you fucking prick
@kazooga1234 Actually Sanders didnt fillibuster NDAA, but that is an ex of ProgressaCunts and Neocunts working together. If you are talking about the Patriot Act same thing. RP did vote against and yes do did Russ Feingold but his fillibuster failed. Plus you cant fillibuster in the House which is where RP is. The moron is a stupid ProgressaCunt like you who believes in the Two Party BS. And history shows the progressive hero FDR signed the exec order to imprison Japanese. cont
@tru you moron you might want to try to read what i said i said he fillibustered the hell out of something i just couldnt remeber what and none of your republicunts fillibustered it either and ron paul wasnt in the fucking congress at the time that the PATRIOT ACT WAS BEING PASSED you moron and as for the surpreme court judges most of the republicans go them to that point brain dead loser and its obama who is also a republicunt you never said one thing obama did that was progressive
@kazooga1234 The fucking moron is you. The Patriot Act passed in Oct of 2001. RP's lastest time in congress has been from 1997 to the present. He was in the congress, doofus and his vote was no. Plus you cant filibuster from the house. Sanders hasnt fillabustered anything . Rand Paul tried introduce an amendment to gut the teeth out of the NDAA. GET YOUR FACTS Straight. Even liberals like Nader and Kucinich agree with RP on core issues. PROGRESSACUNTS LIKE YOU are mindless sheep
@truthout911 you fucking moron no it wasnt it wasnt passed until after the twin towers blew up you dumbass and it was past when bush was incharge and it was in 04 you dont know any facts and ron paul wasnt in office so why dont you get your facts straight
@kazooga1234 The last time I checked a calendar Oct of 2001 comes after 9/11/01. Who is the dumbass NOW. Besides it doesnt change the fact that RP voted no and was in congress at the time. The Patriot act passed in Oct 2001 not in 2004. This fact alone disqualifies anything else you have to say. The typical Sam Seder listener. Koolaid drinkers and childlike Morons. When you join us in the real world maybe you will grow up.
@truthout the twin towers didnt blow up until 04 and the PATRIOT ACT wasnt passed until after then and ron paul wasnt in congress at the time meaning that what he says doesnt matter and alan grayson says the samething ron paul does about the PATRIOT ACT and you completely disregaurd it so i should also disregaurd ron pauls and it happened in 04 not 01 and you are a moron for thinking that it happened in 01 because the twin towers blew up when bush was in office hence the PATRIOT ACT
@kazooga1234 We just had the 10th anniversary of 9/11 this past September. That puts at 2001, not 2004. Are you on crack, I guess so because even the most braindead moron knows that. Oops I guess you dont. Even if it was 2004, RP was in congress then as well. Twins towers blew up 9/11/01. and Bush was in office in 01. Tell us something How much crack do you do?
@tru either way bush was president and i did mess up i read something else but it doesnt mean that a republicunt wasnt president who passed the PATRIOT ACT and ron paul wasnt in congress at the time that it got passed i am bad at dates only i still think its 2011 so for me thats my weakness i am like john green who writes friday as every day of the week but it doesnt stop a republicunt from passing the PATRIOT ACT and you act as if the republicans are so fucking great and they arent
@kazooga1234 Patriot Act couldnt have been signed by Bush without the help of ProgressaCunts and NeoCunts alike.. You can go to Project Vote Smart dot org and look up RP vote for which he was in congress. But then a stupid ProgressaCunt like you doesnt even know what year 9/11 happened in, so why should anyone listen to you.
NO IT COULDNT HAVE BEEN YOU FUCKING MORON THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED VETO thats why obama gets blamed for everything passed now eventhough its the republicunts that want all that shit passed not the real progessives like grayson and grayson will be back in office you are just so fucking retarded you dont even know the laws and i get dates confussed its my only weakness and i said i messed up unlike you beause you are so retarded you dont admit to facts and i can prove that as well
@kazoogaCUNT There is something also called a NO vote which is something anyone of your ProgressaCunts in the House or Senate could have used and they didnt. Keep dreaming about Grayson, oh wait are you ProgressaCunts still waiting to draft Al Gore. LOLOL You are a joke.
@truthout911 YOU FUCKING MORON NOTHING CAN JUST BE PASSED WITHOUT THE PRESIDENT SIGNING OFF ON IT and alan grayson wanted to have a public option a real public option that would have just been an option for the states and people who wanted it and if you didnt want it you wouldnt have paid into it and it would have helped millions and it was bush who pushed the PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING MORON bush didnt veto it or anything proving you wrong
@kazooga1234 Note a stupid ProgressaCunt, take a civics lesson. A president cant sign off on legislation until it is passed in the House and the Senate. Legislation begins in the House. That is basic civics 101. Or to a Progresscunt like you who is so dumb, go and watch the old School House Rock cartoons, That appeals to someone with your mindset.
@truthout911 THATS NOT TRUE AT ALL HE COULD HAVE VETOED IT every president can veto stuff and i can prove that he wanted it passed i dare you to send me a link proving that bush didnt want the PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING MORON
@kazooga1234 Yes he can only veto legislation after its passed. basic civics 101, Bush passed the Patriot Act just like Obama passed NDAA with help from both sides and those are the facts, Sorry your ProgressaCunt bubble got busted. You cant veto legislation that has not passed the House and Senate. Boy old Sam has gone down hill from the AA days, which isnt saying much. From a marginal syndicated radio show to broadcasting from his basement with morons like you for listeners
@truthout911 here is where you are wrong and stupid After Congress passes a bill, it doesn't become law without the president's signature, and if he vetoes it, it may not be enacted at all (although Congress has the option of overriding the veto). Thus, the president is an immensely powerful presence throughout the legislative process despite his small constitutional role.
and alan grayson fillibustered and he was never in the senate explain that
@kazooga1234 Here is where you are wrong The House first passes a bill then the Senate passes a similar bill, then it goes for reconciliation and then a final bill is passed to the President desk for a signature. Remember the health care bill. Again take civics and lay off the crack.
@truthout911 the president still needs to veto or sign before anything else can happen and BUSH FUCKING SIGNED THE PATRIOT ACT YOU MORON and you said congressmen cant fillibuster I PROVED YOU WRONG WITH THAT BECAUSE ALAN GRAYSON HAS FILLIBUSTERED THINGS and hes not in the senate he is just in congress and you were acting like BUSH DIDNT SIGN THE BILL WHEN HE FUCKING DID YOU PRICK
@kazooga1234 I never Bush didnt sign the Patriot Act you CRACKHEAD what I said was he couldnt have signed it unless the House and Senate Passed it with the Help of Both ProgressaCunts and Neocuts alike. Just like Obama with NDAA, is that clear enough for you. Probably not.
@truthout911 BUSH DID SIGN THE PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING MORON AND I CAN PROVE THAT IN A PM IF YOU WANT ME TO he had to because nobody gave a shit to push it through and BUSH WANTED IT YOU FUCKING MORON for you to say that i want proof on it then give me the link that says bush never signed it because everything i found says BUSH SIGNED THE PATRIOT ACT he never vetoed it
@kazooga1234 Admit the truth there is no shame in being retarded or brain damaged. What happened did your mommy have you vaccinated as a baby? This explains your ignorance and incoherent sentences. Its too bad you chose to be a ProgressaCunt and drink the koolaid, but being brain damaged, I know you cant help it.
@kazooga1234 I see from your profile and your video you produced that you are really retarded and you age is really a handicap for you so I will forgive your ignorance and stupidity because you just cant help yourself. Just make sure your Mommy comes to clean you up and wipe the droll off your chin. LOLOLOLOL
@truthout911 thats not my video thats a P4A as in project for awesome a video to stop world suck and yes its a cause i enjoy but its only added to my favs you moron not one i uploaded myself and you did say that bush didnt pass the PATRIOT ACT in this comment when you called me kazoogacunt you shouldnt have made it so ovious that you were such a moron
*articulate
candyrosepetals 3 days ago
"At the end of the day", "Ummmmm", "Curtail", "Uhhhhhhh, "At the end of the day", complete inability to articularte, "At the end of the day" - common excuses this twat uses to justify voting for evil. Seriously, expand your vocabulary! RON PAUL 2012.
candyrosepetals 3 days ago
Who is this loser?
candyrosepetals 3 days ago
this guy needs a new brain.
phxarcher87 1 week ago
You like Occupy and civil liberties but you excuse "The Obama" for signing the NDAA. You respect liberties so long as they only apply to people with whom you agree. Will you be o.k. when they start marching the Occupiers into indefinate detention facilities? I'd bet you would buy an "Obama" justification of such a violation but scream like hell if it was a Republican initiative. You're either lyin' to me or your lyin' to yourself. Enjoy freedom of speech while still you can. Ron Paul 2012!
kilgoretroutcanada 1 week ago
Go Ron Paul. Go Merica!
RandyBo6 1 week ago
A vote for Obama is a vote wasted and this commentary on him was based on ignorance.
Reido2828 3 weeks ago
Looks like Paultards have taken over the comment section of this vid. Why, oh why am I not surprised...
InvisibleDiary 4 weeks ago
@InvisibleDiary
And looks like the Obamabot schmucks are still making excuses for Obama's incompetence.
Reido2828 3 weeks ago
@Reido2828 This just goes to show how lame you fanatics are. You guys always dismiss criticism against your messiah from liberals as obama supporters lashing out against him. If you actually paid attention to the consensus who view Seder's vids, then you would know that many of them don't like Obama and would actually like a real progressive in office instead of the pseudo-progressive we have now.
InvisibleDiary 3 weeks ago
@InvisibleDiary
I'm not a fanatic supporter nor am I American. I am simply spreading Paul's message and much of what was said about him in this video is a tad distroted. A lot of Paul's supporters are radical but he has given people a strong message and hope. Many progressives are so unaware of the many problems the country faces. Also, many are unaware of Ron Paul's predictions in the past. he has been dead on with so many issues over the last 15 years, that it boggles the mind
Reido2828 3 weeks ago
Ummm huh well unmm uhhh uhhh ummm uhhhh
Beantownpierce34 4 weeks ago 2
"At the end of the day"... ur a moron and understand nothing RP says and if you say u don't have to defend your vote for obama you arejust plain stupid because Obama did nothing he promised and your voting him to the Office a 2nd Time ?!
Snick14 1 month ago
uhhhh uhhhh uhhhhhh uhhhh uhhhh uhhhhhhh uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
hmt741 1 month ago
Who gave this clown a microphone?
thisismyusernamemr 1 month ago
ron paul 2012. he will save you. hes your new jesus
teedonster2 1 month ago
this guys an idiot
hmt741 1 month ago
@hmt741 you`re the idiot. Cant stand criticism? Bad man said somthing bad about the great R.P., he`s an idiot.Fucking kindergarten level.
filozovs 1 month ago
I uh think uh that uh we uh should uh. Words are your tools if you want to make money off your thoughts. Can you say 3 sentences without saying uh uh uh uh uh? You fucking clueless idiot.
howiwatchvideos 1 month ago
Of course he can end the wars, he would be the Commander-In-Chief.
alanlafranchi 1 month ago
FDA is good? Aspartam, Fluoride, Mercury, Prozac and GMO food good? Good appetite - LOL. EPA should waste tax payer's sour earnt on Global Warming bs??? Ron Paul won't end the wars but RA would - WTF are you talking about? Get your ass into your car to get an abortion done in a state where it's legal or is this too unconveniant?
Packgammon 1 month ago
He's the Commander in Chief! He says what the military does. He has that power.
evilbert81 1 month ago
China will take care of us. Or vote for Ron Paul.
elanmorales1 1 month ago
"at the end of the day"
dbzfanatic02 1 month ago
I prefer Gary Johnson also.
Hes a saner more libertarian and up front Ron Paul.
I hope he sticks around even after the election.
waltermh111 1 month ago
Sam Seder if you vote for Obama you may as well call yourself a fucking traitor to the United States for siding with the NDAA
noyouaintgettingit 1 month ago
Sam Seder must loves seeing dead and handicapped US soldiers.
CRAPCANNONS 1 month ago
ron paul 2012. fuck all those who waste their votes on anyone else
teedonster2 1 month ago
@teedonster2 so you want to die and and destroy the world because that is what will happen if ron paul is president he will get rid of the EPA making it so we dont have any healthy foods and the FDA making it so we dont know what meds are compatable or what the side effects of meds are and then he will make you starve to death by going on the gold standered and he will kill your parents by demolishing the entitlement programs
kazooga1234 1 month ago 3
Obama is as bad as the GOP candidates. Gary Johnson in 2012.
jbevan70 1 month ago
Dear Paulites:
The founding fathers wern't gods, and the Constitution is an imperfect document written at a time when the most cutting edge medical device was the leech.
Get some damn perspective.
sakar181 1 month ago in playlist More videos from SamSeder
So if this guy thinks the NDAA stripped his rights, what is he wasting his time asking Sam who he likes in 2012? If these people actually think NDAA has stripped their rights, they sure have rolled over on it. Where are they protesting? filing lawsuits?
stephenrblv 1 month ago
Do you really need an EPA that outrageously LIED about 911 dust toxicity? They called it harmless when in actuality it was FULL of mercury and asbestos. They urged New Yorkers to go back to their offices and shops and not to worry. I CANNOT forgive the EPA for this gross breach of their duty. They were formed to PROTECT our health and yet they sent thousands more to a slow sick death in announcing it was safe. People DEPEND upon their expertise. They betrayed a sacred trust.
glowzone 1 month ago
@glowzone Leave local environmental concerns to the States and the courts.
glowzone 1 month ago
lol Ron Paul just likes to follow the constitution. These other past presidents has thrown the constitution out the door. That about abortion shouldn't be used as a form of birth control. Women should think before they get a penis in their vagina. Abortion is about killing a life. Furthermore if a men are forced to pay child support. Than they should have the right to stop a women from getting an abortion. Men have babies too. Women should only have abortion if raped or if she could die.
o0PocoMax0o 1 month ago
@o0PocoMax0o your an idiot a woman choosing to have an aboriton is her consitutional right and the surpreme court said so and what morons like you dont understand is that ron paul isnt going to make the government smaller he is just going to switch were the government has controll so no more FED but the IRS will be in a womans womb and why dont you be for all males needing to get vacetomys and most woman will die if they cant get a safe legal abortion duh
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Why am I an idiot? Because some women can't keep their legs closed. Using abortions as birth control. Instead of using contraception? Having tax payers pay for plan parenthood. Money that the United States don't have. Now who is the idiot me, or the women that don't use contraception. Oh if you have it your way. You will have tax payers pay for abortions whether they like it or not. Ron Paul smaller government and less spending.
o0PocoMax0o 1 month ago
@o0PocoMax0o you are the idiot because you dont get that woman will DIE IF THEY DONT GET TO HAVE ABORTIONS and you fucking said that woman should be able to get abortions in the case of DEATH but now you are fucking taking that back and i have every right to call you an idiot FOR TRYING TO TAKE AWAY MY CONSTUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A SAFE LEGAL ABORTION and you act as if MALES DONT WANT FEMALES TO HAVE ABORTIONS when its most of the times males making females get abortions and
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@o0PocoMax0o "Because some women can't keep their legs closed."
Right on.
kevinwaynesongs 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 It's ok to debate me. But please don't insult me directly. I'm just debating. My comments are not directed at you personally. It's directed at the few. The words I use were proper. So please refrain from calling names like, " You idiot" and so forth.
o0PocoMax0o 1 month ago
@o0PocoMax0o (continue) what you should be fighting for is for ALL MALES TO HAVE TO HAVE VACTOMYS THEN after all they are the ones that PUSH the females to have sex with them AND RON PAUL ISNT FOR SMALLER GOVERNMENT YOU MORON he is just for switching what the government does he wants to make it so government is the same size but instead of having cops like the EPA and FDA he wants IT IN A WOMANS WOMB SO THEY DONT HAVE THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A SAFE LEGAL ABORTION
kazooga1234 1 month ago
Comment removed
HybridD91 1 month ago in playlist More videos from SamSeder
At 4:30 When He says, "He just doesn't like Federal Authority" - He is right! but then the next sentence is, "he just doesn't have a problem with a lot of these things" - That's wrong. Ron Paul doesn't endorse racism. It would be a terrible business practice this day and age. Ron Paul doesn't endorse discrimination, drug use, etc.. Ron Paul is the best choice for President this election.
vabado4u 1 month ago
Yeah, vote for Obama.
Never mind that he just signed a statute to have the military nab people with no charge, no warrant, no contact with a lawyer, no contact with family, and send them out of the country for as long as he wants.
Never mind that he's the first president to have two Americans killed by executive order, one of them 16-years-old.
He is literally a murdering dictator, but you just can't seem to internalize such a starkly obvious fact.
Fuck you Seder.
JesusDillinger 1 month ago
Holy crap, this guy has no understanding of Ron Paul or the Federal Government. What an idiot.
ryratt 1 month ago
@BenjiREC Reducing the debt is not going to help the economy. Read anything by Keynes or Paul Krugman. We need more spending to get the economy going. Lastly, I agree with you on ending the Fed, it's a damn rigged casino. Read Matt Taibii's Griftopia for more on that. And yes, let's end these damn wars (but in Africa? - don't you mean the middle east?)
Umberto2 1 month ago
@BenjiREC Okay, but I don't think those are most important issues facing our country. I guess that's where we disagree. When you say the constitution is important, that would probably mean that you and Paul would oppose the appointment of Rich Cordray on the Consumer Financial Watchdog position because it's "more gov't." We need this position to fight for the people against the financial corporations that hold all the power in Congress. more to come...
Umberto2 1 month ago
Ron Paul understands that the 14th Amendment applies the rights guaranteed within the Constitution to the individuals within the states. He doesn't say that state oppression is OK.
brryman 1 month ago
im convinced that he's for Ron Paul. at a kid
TheLoswheat 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I find it strange that you would vote for Obama even after he's been a huge failure. Personally I can't think of one election promise he has fulfilled. Wars/Spending/Stripping of liberties have all increased drastically under his watch. Where's the "Change?"
Even more odd is your reasoning that you'd vote for him mainly because he supports "a women's right to choose" yet he has stripped all liberties/freedoms from every American (men and women) with the NDAA. Much more concerning in my book
OneMoreOpinion1 1 month ago 3
Comment removed
OneMoreOpinion1 1 month ago
Why is Ron Paul even still running? If Fox, conservative radio hosts, and ~75% of the Republican party aren't behind him he can not possibly win. I like Ron's idea that we should get out of the wars for the sake of our troops and the health of our economy. However, his ideas on basically gutting our federal government, EPA, FDA, letting the states dictate women's reproductive rights and gay rights and totally letting the markets and corporations run wild are simply unacceptable.
swilkins1984 1 month ago
"uhhh... Ummmm, uhhhh... ummmm.." plz stop making videos sam. You embarass yourself.
tristynleos 1 month ago
The NDAA has stripped all American of their Constitutional Bill of Rights and OBAMA did it. This is treason and tyranny! What good is it that all people are treated equal in a Tyranny? Perhaps people on the left should look up that video of the North Koreans fake crying over their dear leader's death. I bet you those people have equal civil rights...ie. the right to be miserable.
OmarThePug 1 month ago
If my state wants to death penalize drug offenders, he'll let them do it. Does that old loon still think he could persuade congress to get on commodity currency ?
maozebong100 1 month ago 2
@maozebong100 Do you think the people of your state would vote for such a measure? You act as if the "state" will just dictate and decide without putting it to a vote...
hmfmi 1 month ago
@hmfmi State can decide if they need to vote on it or not. Lmao.
maozebong100 1 month ago
@hmfmi - You may live in a progressive state - but keep in mind there are states that elect loons like Brewer, and elect sheriffs like Joe AreAPieHole. There is zero doubt that states rights, when it comes to civil rights would triumph - if you'll recall, we sort of had a civil war over that issue.
47f0 1 month ago
@47f0 What do you consider a progressive state? I'm anti big government consolidation of power. The larger the government and broader the scope of power, the more incentive their is for lobbying and corruption. Civil liberties are sacrificed for "the greater good of the nation", it's happening in the EU as we speak and is contrary to a free society.
The civil war was much deeper than you elude to. States rights = slavery is so engrained in peoples minds it's sad, just as sad as slavery.
hmfmi 1 month ago
@BenjiREC The executive branch is operating way out of it's authority too, I'd say even more so.
Congress is the voice of the people, or supposed to be, and therefore should have the most power in my opinion.
The Executive branch is not supposed to have the power to do what we've seen both Bush and Obama get away with...but congress is complacent and handing over their/our powers to the executive branch AND the Federal Reserve.
hmfmi 1 month ago
With the NDAA in effect maybe a President Santorum will deem all abortion doctors, and women who have abortions a threat to national security and arrest them.
willyswear 1 month ago
@hmfmi "...the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God..." That 's not the christian god, nor is "creator" defined as a being. Now, where do those words appear in the U.S. Constitution? You know, our founding document.
States do not have the right, nor should they, to deny "equal protection of the laws" (Amend. 14).
It's not about federal power, it's about constitutional rights and protections.
YY4Me133 1 month ago
@YY4Me133 What is a creator if not some sort of entity? Is an entity not a being? I'm not arguing the case of the existence of God, only that the country was founded with a spiritual belief system allowing us to believe what we want, Atheism etc.. If you remove "the creator" etc.. then you remove the basis for the rights proclaimed by the Declaration of Independence, you know, the founding document which preceded the constitution. Both to restrain govt and maximize freedom.
hmfmi 1 month ago
@YY4Me133
Constitutional rights and protections are there precisely to curb federal power. Federal power is explicitly outlined in the constitution- the 3 branches. All powers not enumerated are reserved to the respective states or to the people... (Amend. 10).
And the power to enforce the 14th amend which you cite, falls with congress' not the executive branch.
The age old argument and it seems the anti-federalists concerns were valid. Presidents are becoming monarchs (shrug)
hmfmi 1 month ago
So this moron thinks federal abortion laws are more important than having constitutional rights.
I guess its ok thousands are dieing in wars and are being tortured, and that we have lost are constitutional right to have a trial by jury. Progressive would rather we all lived in slavery than have a woman go to another state to get an abortion.
Progressive=Retard
willyswear 1 month ago
Does the NDAA revoke all your rights..? Or does it revoke your 4th and 5th amendment rights in limited circumstances..? Oh... okay.
Ejwoods08 1 month ago
@Ejwoods08 Tell me what rights do you have when you can be arrested by the military and have no right to a trial? The NDAA takes all rights away if it is ever to be abused the President and military can literally arrest who ever they deem a threat.
willyswear 1 month ago
Notice how Ron Paul fans get personally offended when you criticise the guy?
jessemaurais 1 month ago 3
He's a con man, folks!
flinkinyc 1 month ago
The federal govt. isn't being run by the Constitution, rather, it is being run by bankers who have been given the ability to control society and the govt. through the use of "legalized" counterfeit money.
In short, if you support big govt. you are supporting big globalist corporations because that is who is running "our" govt.
End the "fed" reserve and you end big globalist corps running your govt. Vote Ron Paul to end the "fed" reserve, vote Ron Paul to end globalist corp. occupation.
dlucas90 1 month ago
It's not veto-proof. Obama doe snot have to sign it.
jeff4justice 1 month ago
@jeff4justice you do realize that if he doesn't sign it, it goes into law by default? And if he vetoes it, that congress can override his veto? If the worst is bound to happen, he might as well not give congressional republicans an opportunity to cast him as uncooperative and soft on terror.
Ejwoods08 1 month ago
@Ejwoods08 Yes I realize those things.
All the more reason why people should stop voting for the 2party system.
jeff4justice 1 month ago
Since congress has the lowest approval rating and the tea Party and Occupy are pissed at the government now is the time for an alternative party movement.
EPA and FDA when the 2party system puts corporately controlled tools in those agencies.
jeff4justice 1 month ago
Your system will not change regardless of who sits in the White House, until you remove the puppeteers that control it. Its not even a government. Theyre simply a buffer between the people & the money - someone for you to blame when things go south.
And youve allowed this puppet govt to take your freedom, based on world security, via fake terrorism. The people with the money know, that gold is not the metal of choice yet, its lead in the shape of ammo. Next up, the Enemy Expatriation Act.
Snarkathon 1 month ago
As for Ron Paul I've never really thought of government as the boogey man that people like Ron Paul seem to think of it as.The idea that you will get rid of all regulatory departments, squash Dept of Education, etc seems to me to be going backwards not forward.
gamesmaster35 1 month ago 3
@gamesmaster35 Watch Nobel prize winning economist Milton Friedman's series called "Free to Choose" from 1980 here on youtube. It's 10 episodes, each deals with an issue we're facing and discussing today. For the first 30 mins Friedman makes his case through a documentary style film. For the last 30, he discusses/debates with people from both sides of the argument. Skip to the second half if you like... but the conversation they engage in is extremely interesting.
hmfmi 1 month ago
It not just that RP's philosophies would allow states to discriminate against African Americans rather some areas would discriminate against Hispanics, immigrants, Muslims, women, etc..our country would no longer be the "united" States of America rather separate states with separate laws. Laws that allow discrimination that I do not agree with. There would be civil unrest and chaos.
golden454 1 month ago 4
@golden454 That's inaccurate, the constitution would still take precedence... It's the other, more divisive issues that would be up to the states. And by states I mean citizens like you and I, deciding what's best for our state, rather than some special interest group in DC, miles away, telling us what's best for us. Issues like Medicinal marijuana, same sex marriage, abortion, etc... Rest assured, that would be much better than having a bad law govern the whole nation
hmfmi 1 month ago
Well said, the fact that Obama is wrong doesn't mean Ron Paul is right.
BottleConcreteBlond 1 month ago 3
@BenjiREC Fair enough. I've thrown quite a bit at you. Can I ask you why you are supporting Ron Paul then? I obviously need serious convincing that he's not going to take us to a regressive or reactionary governing position. Can you convince me otherwise? Are you a single-issue voter?
Umberto2 1 month ago
@codemeth Same here.
InvisibleDiary 1 month ago
@PompousPreacher So if I could give you examples of Carbon-14 dating being very badly off in dating methods....Would that work for ya? Would you still proclaim it's accuracy?
Still not sure where ya got that the world was created during the bronze age or where ya came up with the 98000 years prior to creation or where ya came up with the creator being a Caucasian male...DNA and the fossil record do not evidence Evolution...They pretty clearly reject it.
someguy6978 1 month ago
Lord, why do all these radio hosts have to be so damn worthless.
Amiduffer 1 month ago
@chronDiggity >Addressing someone's idea by injecting straw man arguments and false dooms day scenarios is not actually addressing them.
He has never done that, and I defy you to point to an example where he has.
GiantSandles 1 month ago
@GiantSandles
"A free market inevitably benefits the powerful"
Sam looks at what problems exist today and falsely blames them on a free market capitalistic system. His dooms day scenario for deregulating the markets is that if we do, things will get worse, when in reality, the deregulation libertarians advocate only evens the playing field. We don't have a free market right now. We've got corporate control over government influencing legislation that stifles competition in THEIR favor.
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@chronDiggity He doesn't blame the inequality that exists today on a free market, that in itself is a strawman.
GiantSandles 1 month ago
@GiantSandles
THAT'S YOUR RESPONSE?
That quote wasn't something I made up. I pulled it right from his videos. A free market doesn't benefit the "powerful." His idea of powerful is wealthy. A truly free market without government intervention benefits the innovative and competitive, and ultimately the consumer. Undefeatable monopolies are made only with government intervention, and a monopoly occurring in a free market will inevitably fall to competition.
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@chronDiggity I hope you realize that your apologetics betray the contradictions of your economic ideology. The worst parasites that feed at the government trough are NOT welfare queens, the unemployed or the elderly; they are big business and corporations. They are the ones who have lobbied for their monopolies. Your non-interventionist theories make you believe that this behavior will magically stop; it won't. The only way to ensure a truly free market is to abolish the corp as a legal entity.
gnomechomskylives 1 month ago 10
@gnomechomskylives
You couldn't be further from the truth.
You think libertarians expect everyone to go back to their corners and play nice once we UNDO all the corruption they've spend BILLIONS on for years and years? Of course not.
That's not the point, however. The straw man argument presented by liberals is that libertarians want to deregulate in a way to FURTHER that level of unfair favoritism for those already at the top.
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@gnomechomskylives You're acting much smarter than you actually are; if you think for one second, that big corporations would be better off under a Ron Paul administration, then you're so ignorant that I don't think it's worth wasting my time trying to educate you on our current system of government.
NikoVlogsGud 1 month ago
@gnomechomskylives A truly free market is absolutely impossible to attain, corporations or not. The market cannot be free without perfect availability of information, which is impossible to ensure.
viliphied 1 month ago
@viliphied In order to have a free market, you must first have a sound monetary system. If some people are given the ability to cheat the system by being able to create money from nothing, then the system has been controlled by unelected dictators, not "free markets".
Through the practice of "fractional reserve banking" and removing the gold standard, certain unelected people have gained monetary control of society through fraud.
Simply put, in a free market no one can shit gold bricks.
dlucas90 1 month ago
@dlucas90 Have you watched Milton Friedman's series from 1980, "Free to Choose"?
hmfmi 1 month ago
@hmfmi No I haven't. Is it good?
dlucas90 1 month ago
@viliphied Yet the "free-er" the market, the "free-er" the people and the more opportunity people have. When restrictions, regulations, tariffs, etc.. are implemented, special interests line up to buy influence and lobby government to pass laws that benefit themselves and create obstacles for competitors (Monsanto?). That's what happens when you give government the power to decide and dictate... The free market is the best anti-monopoly system, far from perfect though.
hmfmi 1 month ago
@chronDiggity No, the quote probably wasn't. Your response was that Sam blames the social problems that exist today on free market capitalism, whereas he isn't; he's saying they would be just as/more prevalent in a free market capitalist system.
He's said before that a free market capitalist system doesn't exist, so I have no fucking idea where you are getting this whole "he blames inequality that exists today on free markets" shit from.
GiantSandles 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GiantSandles
First of all, here's the actual quote: "Sam looks at what problems exist today and falsely blames them on a free market capitalistic system."
I don't know why you injected something I never said.
Secondly, there's more than social problems resulting in corporate communism. Here's a blatant one: Health insurance. I mean literally, people are dying and they are making record profits, sending prices artificially up. This isn't the result of free market.
Should I even continue?
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@chronDiggity Okay, I thought you said he was blaming inequality on a free market because I was talking about it before you said that. My mistake, but you were still saying that he blamed problems that exist TODAY on a system which he doesn't even believe exists. That was my point and it went way over your head.
And yeah, I'm not in favour of the US health care system, and I think there are better ways to provide it. e.g. the NHS in Britain.
GiantSandles 1 month ago
@GiantSandles
A centralized system is definitely better than an entire industry build around federal immunity from competition. Look up the McCarran Ferguson of 1945. 60 years of federal immunity from competition has left the insurance companies giant, and without competition, they've been allowed to LITERALLY get together and collectively set pricing. If the free market had not been bastardized by government intervention, health care reform wouldn't even be an issue.
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@chronDiggity 1) Again, I don't even advocate how the US has handled the issue.
2) Really? Everyone who needed it would be able to get health care if it were left to the free market?
GiantSandles 1 month ago
@GiantSandles
I said health care reform wouldn't be an issue, meaning there would be no reason to reform it. The prices wouldn't be inflated, they'd be competitive.
I'm sure, given the state of our political system, we would still have government insurance for those who absolutely can't afford it and need it but it wouldn't be the kind of burden we see today with medicare and medicaid.
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@chronDiggity "we would still have government insurance for those who absolutely can't afford it and need it"
That I could agree with, but it's not the stance of most of the libertarians I've spoken to.
GiantSandles 1 month ago
@GiantSandles
I'm speaking as a realist. We would still have those things because we would still have people who use the government to create such things. They simply wouldn't as big of a burden. Not saying it's my stance, just what I would expect America to look like in this alternate reality.
chronDiggity 1 month ago
@tru abortion is in the consitution the surpreme court says so and if you want the proof to that i have it and its not murdering a child not allowing a woman to have an abortion is murdering females as well as whats inside of her because females use coat hangers to have miscairages as well as do crackcocain and other drugs and end up having a crack baby that nobody will adopt but that baby will have to suffer for a day and die anyways so the mother went through that pain for nothing
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@someguy6978 abortion isnt murder not when geraiffes eat plants to have a misscairage as well and when a woman gets pills off line or does meth/crackcoacain and other drugs to have a misscairage and then has the baby and its still born or only lives for a fucking day why the hell should a woman have to go through that pain and nobody adopts crack babys and they will be a lot of crack babys if not worse thats why abortion is in the constitution and the FED controls the millitary
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 A matter of opinion then since I believe There's a difference between US and Animals and you apparently don't but "Abortion rights do give extra Privileges to woman which is Unconstitutional as well....A woman can decide whether or not to keep the baby while the man has no say in it yet if the woman decides to keep the baby, the man is bound by law to support the kid....The Federal reserve does not control the military. The Federal reserve is a privately owned bank.
someguy6978 1 month ago
abortions r part of the consitution the sepreme court has said so many times and i can prove that and people r animals stupid to be more exact we are primates and primates are a type of monkey and that also explains why idiots like you dont understand that a fetus that is unwanted is just a parasite i bet you wouldnt be going ya lets make it so every single male has to have a vactomy after all thats not in the consitution why dont you be for that instead of weman killing themselves
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Disagree entirely since I don't attend the church of Evolution nor do I worship at the altar of Time and if ya look through the comments here, you'll notice someone else was trying to "debate" the subject of evolution as well...So now you support Women retaining the ability to have kids and Men giving up that right?
Really?
What you introduce is blatantly unconstitutional and you appear to be saying..."My rights as a Woman are more important than the rights of men"..I disagree again
someguy6978 1 month ago
@someguy6978 you are saying facts arent true well here is a fact for you wimp(dot)com(slash)niceinfo its called evolution for dummys maybe you will learn something about facts and about how bats are birds you fucking moron that doesnt even understand that a womans right for her to do what she wishes to is in the constitution when i can prove that a million times over thanks to the supreme court and their rulings
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 I'm saying what you claim to be facts can easily be shown to be false....Easily...You're spouting quite a bit of nonsense...Easily disproved nonsense.
Go to Ron Paul's website and see for yourself what he believes and quite spouting rhetoric you hear from your local msm pundit.
someguy6978 1 month ago
@someguy6978 what i am saying are 100% facts because i can prove them with links and i dont need to see ron pauls lieing page where he puts only what he wants idiots like you to see i have actually read through all of his speeches and i have heard all of his speeches and he has said millions of times demolish all of the FED even when cenk asked if it was just the reserve he said the FED as in all of it so maybe you should listen to him talk more
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Using examples in a corrupted country is pretty laughable....i can give you a specific example of almost all 10 of the bill of Rights being violated....Even though they are explicitly and specifically stated as residing inside us and are NOT Governable unless we choose to allow them to be...Do you understand the implication of that statement?
The Bill of rights isn't something the Government "lets us do" it's an area where the Government has NO Authority as per the Constitution.
someguy6978 1 month ago
@s america was perfectly fine under bill clinton and we had the FED and he got us out of debt as well as the EPA and FDA and everything under clinton worked perfectly well so the corrupt system isnt because of the stuff we have its because its not being used properly and just because something is broken doesnt mean we cant fix it and demolishing it will only make things worse and i can prove that and i am for everybody having constitutional rights and abortion is in the constitution
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Please, I beg of you; better to let others think you're a fool and remain silent rather than speak and remove all doubt. Your English grammar, spelling and sentence structure is beyond poor and you're making all of us who are pro-choice look bad through association.
gnomechomskylives 1 month ago
@gnomechomskylives the punctuation takes up spaces thats why i dont use them but i can prove what i am saying so i dont make the people who are for woman to be able to get safe legal abortions look bad i have 100s of links saved in my favs
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Heh believe me, I know what it's like to run out of space. But that's why you need to edit and revise. Just try to use *some* punctuation and clearer language otherwise people you're arguing against will sound "smarter" by comparison. Sorry to criticize you but it needs to be said.
gnomechomskylives 1 month ago
@gnomechomskylives i never use punctuation in the comment section i only use it in PMs and those ron paul loving morons will never be smarter then me because they cant prove anything they say they just think the lies the believe are real and dont know the facts but i have them all saved
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 The supreme court in the late 1890s said seperate but equal was ok and congress passed laws that said blacks were only 3/5 of a person. None of that made it right. Again Margaret Sanger loving ProgressaCunts like you thinks its trendy to murder yours babies, especially if they are black. So thats your rationale. So I will worry about the financial crisis the NDAA, TSA, and endless wars. ProgressaCunts need to get your priorities straight.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 yes and then that got undone and the surpreme court agrees that a black person is a whole person unlike with what ron paul is saying ron paul thinks that a black person is still 3/5 of a person and thats 1 of the main problems with ron paul and with your last thing about NDAA and TSA thats why i am doing a write in vote for alan grayson because he wont kill people like ron paul will there are only a few cercumstances were i wont be voting for grayson for 2012
kazooga1234 1 month ago 2
@kazooga1234 Give me a break with your Alan Grayson. ProgressaCunts like you are so dumb with your koolaid of your fantasy of socialism. First off Grayson voted while he was in congress for every military appropriations bill plus he said we could continue pentagon spending while pandering to idiots like you about socialism. RP is the only one who will repeal the NDAA, the patriot act and bring the troops, and that is based on his record, not HOPE AND CHANGE that Obamaniods promised
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 alan grayson actually wants to help people he got the FED audited and you have no idea how much he is against NDAA and how much he wanted to have a public option that was just an option and if you didnt want it it wouldnt have been something you paid for and there wasnt going to be a fine and the supreme court does make decisions about the consitution you are just to fucking stupid to actually do research about that and there are only republicunts not progessive ones
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Alan Grayson was one of the ones R Emanuel blackmailed to take the teeth out of RP original audit Fed bill, plus RP has bill dealing with this issues for some 30 old yrs Greyson is a johnnie come lately. Again Greyson likes to run his mouth and pander to useless ProgressaCunts like you, but when it comes to doing something, he is no action. Oh and public option, he voted for Obamacare. ProgressaCunts love being pandered too.
truthout911 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 The fucking moron is you, because your last statements make absolutely no sense. My point in using the term ProgressaCunt is to point out the behavior. Truth is their are just as many NeoCunts as well Just like both parties alike who voted for the NDAA, so to act like ProgressaCunts are angels, you are being played for a fool and you will never see the whole picture.
truthout911 1 month ago
what you are saying isnt true at all you dont understand that the republicunts actually want to take away peoples rights and that bill got passed because of the republicunts and you think that ron paul is any different when he is going to take away womans constitutional rights as well as allow corps to make it so blacks have to enter certain stores some ways and whites another way if they want to you are a fucking moron not me and i can prove what i am saying you cant prove jackshit
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 What rights do the "republicunts" want to take away? Black, white, gay, straight, isn't the issue, it isn't about group rights or collective rights, it's about individual rights. And if you DO want to talk about "group rights" what about Men's rights? Men have no say when it comes to abortion, they have to pay to support a child even if they dont want it, and they cant compel a woman to have it and pay child support for the man to raise the baby... is that just?
hmfmi 1 month ago
@hmfmi try the womans constitutional right to have a safe legal abortion or the right for gays to adopt children those rights and also the right for gays to be married and they also want to make government bigger to make sure that woman arent getting abortions
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Oh you mean like all of the ProgressaCunts in the congress and Senate who voted for the NDAA along with the Neocunts. Progressives like Carl Levin. Again you drink the koolaid of ProgressaCuntism. Ron Paul has a record of action to run on, all Grayson has to run is his big mouth. Again to Margaret Sanger loving liberals like you and Sam its trendy and hip to kill you baby, especially if its black. But of course you love Obama's Libyan policy so its not a suprise
truthout911 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Oh btw lets not forget the ProgressaCunts along with the Neocunts who voted for the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, the FISA Act, ObamaCare. and I could go on. The point is there is no difference between them, but you are too stupid to see that. Thats why Sam likes useful idiots like you to listen to his stupid show,. You just mouth ProgressaCunt talking pts.
truthout911 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 You're arguing from a perspective of what you'd like to be true and not what is actually true.
Wish you could see that.
Cya
someguy6978 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 So, if the supreme court overturned their previous ruling on Pro choice....You'd accept it as "Constitutional" than right?
If the Supreme court said "OK, we we're wrong and Abortion isn't lawful as per the Constitution" you'd accept that?
someguy6978 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 and my point in bring up those decisions and laws was to say because congress or the supreme court says something, doesnt make it right. Just like Roe v Wade, even the woman whose case it involved has come out and said that it was a bad decision and has regretted was she did, but abortion is not my issue. Again ProgressaCunts need to get their priorities straight. Funny you cared about ending wars when Bush was in. Oh I guess its not their CAUSE CELEB anymore
truthout911 1 month ago
the progressives didnt vote for the PATRIOT ACT it was actually all of the republicans russ fiengold fillibustered the hell out of it and alan grayson hated it and wasnt in office at the time that was being shoved through when A REPUBLICUNT SIGNED IT INTO EFFECT but your stupid brain doesnt remember any of that so it shows that there are only republicunts and any sellout democrat isnt a progressive you moron beause progressive means change things for the better like grayson wants to
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Oh yes they did, only one senator didnt, and it enjoyed a good number ProgressaCunt congress votes too. Just like all of the other liberty stealing legislation. ProgressaCunts and Neocunts work together. They pretend to fight but they are on the same team. Only morons like you cant seem to understand that.Grayson talks a good game and thats all he can do. Again actions speak louder than words. Except to Zombie ProgressaCunts like you.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 and bernie sanders voted no i dont think he fillibustered the hell out of it and he is a progessive still in congress and it shows that you dont even pay attention to the FACT THAT THE REPUBLICUNT BUSH COULD HAVE VETOED THE BILL BUT WANTED TO PASS IT and you are the moron for thinking that republicans are better then democrats when it was a democrat who fillibustered the hell out of it and alan grayson actually wants to tax the top 1% and balance the budget
kazooga1234 1 month ago 3
@kazooga1234 Sanders voted against the NDAA but he didnt try to fillibuster it, it was Rand Paul who try to, plus introduce an amendment to gut the teeth out of it to arrest citizens.. Plus Obama wanted the right to arrest citizens. A true PROGRESSACUNT. Much like FDR who arrested Japanese. As I said before there is no difference between the two, its you who thinks they are. Both supported it in unison. And Grayson is just running his big mouth and pandering to idiots like you.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 we werent talking about the NDAA and there was one thing that bernie sanders did fillibuster and nobody else did and he even went on a hungery strike for it so it shows how stupid you and and obama isnt a progessive you fucking moron he is a republican just like the rest of the republicunts you cant name one progessive thing he has done while he was in office because he was to busy listening to those morons you love so much so you should love obama too you fucking prick
kazooga1234 1 month ago 2
@kazooga1234 Actually Sanders didnt fillibuster NDAA, but that is an ex of ProgressaCunts and Neocunts working together. If you are talking about the Patriot Act same thing. RP did vote against and yes do did Russ Feingold but his fillibuster failed. Plus you cant fillibuster in the House which is where RP is. The moron is a stupid ProgressaCunt like you who believes in the Two Party BS. And history shows the progressive hero FDR signed the exec order to imprison Japanese. cont
truthout911 1 month ago
@tru you moron you might want to try to read what i said i said he fillibustered the hell out of something i just couldnt remeber what and none of your republicunts fillibustered it either and ron paul wasnt in the fucking congress at the time that the PATRIOT ACT WAS BEING PASSED you moron and as for the surpreme court judges most of the republicans go them to that point brain dead loser and its obama who is also a republicunt you never said one thing obama did that was progressive
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 The fucking moron is you. The Patriot Act passed in Oct of 2001. RP's lastest time in congress has been from 1997 to the present. He was in the congress, doofus and his vote was no. Plus you cant filibuster from the house. Sanders hasnt fillabustered anything . Rand Paul tried introduce an amendment to gut the teeth out of the NDAA. GET YOUR FACTS Straight. Even liberals like Nader and Kucinich agree with RP on core issues. PROGRESSACUNTS LIKE YOU are mindless sheep
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 you fucking moron no it wasnt it wasnt passed until after the twin towers blew up you dumbass and it was past when bush was incharge and it was in 04 you dont know any facts and ron paul wasnt in office so why dont you get your facts straight
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 The last time I checked a calendar Oct of 2001 comes after 9/11/01. Who is the dumbass NOW. Besides it doesnt change the fact that RP voted no and was in congress at the time. The Patriot act passed in Oct 2001 not in 2004. This fact alone disqualifies anything else you have to say. The typical Sam Seder listener. Koolaid drinkers and childlike Morons. When you join us in the real world maybe you will grow up.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout the twin towers didnt blow up until 04 and the PATRIOT ACT wasnt passed until after then and ron paul wasnt in congress at the time meaning that what he says doesnt matter and alan grayson says the samething ron paul does about the PATRIOT ACT and you completely disregaurd it so i should also disregaurd ron pauls and it happened in 04 not 01 and you are a moron for thinking that it happened in 01 because the twin towers blew up when bush was in office hence the PATRIOT ACT
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 We just had the 10th anniversary of 9/11 this past September. That puts at 2001, not 2004. Are you on crack, I guess so because even the most braindead moron knows that. Oops I guess you dont. Even if it was 2004, RP was in congress then as well. Twins towers blew up 9/11/01. and Bush was in office in 01. Tell us something How much crack do you do?
truthout911 1 month ago
@tru either way bush was president and i did mess up i read something else but it doesnt mean that a republicunt wasnt president who passed the PATRIOT ACT and ron paul wasnt in congress at the time that it got passed i am bad at dates only i still think its 2011 so for me thats my weakness i am like john green who writes friday as every day of the week but it doesnt stop a republicunt from passing the PATRIOT ACT and you act as if the republicans are so fucking great and they arent
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Patriot Act couldnt have been signed by Bush without the help of ProgressaCunts and NeoCunts alike.. You can go to Project Vote Smart dot org and look up RP vote for which he was in congress. But then a stupid ProgressaCunt like you doesnt even know what year 9/11 happened in, so why should anyone listen to you.
truthout911 1 month ago
NO IT COULDNT HAVE BEEN YOU FUCKING MORON THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED VETO thats why obama gets blamed for everything passed now eventhough its the republicunts that want all that shit passed not the real progessives like grayson and grayson will be back in office you are just so fucking retarded you dont even know the laws and i get dates confussed its my only weakness and i said i messed up unlike you beause you are so retarded you dont admit to facts and i can prove that as well
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazoogaCUNT There is something also called a NO vote which is something anyone of your ProgressaCunts in the House or Senate could have used and they didnt. Keep dreaming about Grayson, oh wait are you ProgressaCunts still waiting to draft Al Gore. LOLOL You are a joke.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 YOU FUCKING MORON NOTHING CAN JUST BE PASSED WITHOUT THE PRESIDENT SIGNING OFF ON IT and alan grayson wanted to have a public option a real public option that would have just been an option for the states and people who wanted it and if you didnt want it you wouldnt have paid into it and it would have helped millions and it was bush who pushed the PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING MORON bush didnt veto it or anything proving you wrong
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Note a stupid ProgressaCunt, take a civics lesson. A president cant sign off on legislation until it is passed in the House and the Senate. Legislation begins in the House. That is basic civics 101. Or to a Progresscunt like you who is so dumb, go and watch the old School House Rock cartoons, That appeals to someone with your mindset.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 THATS NOT TRUE AT ALL HE COULD HAVE VETOED IT every president can veto stuff and i can prove that he wanted it passed i dare you to send me a link proving that bush didnt want the PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING MORON
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Yes he can only veto legislation after its passed. basic civics 101, Bush passed the Patriot Act just like Obama passed NDAA with help from both sides and those are the facts, Sorry your ProgressaCunt bubble got busted. You cant veto legislation that has not passed the House and Senate. Boy old Sam has gone down hill from the AA days, which isnt saying much. From a marginal syndicated radio show to broadcasting from his basement with morons like you for listeners
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 here is where you are wrong and stupid After Congress passes a bill, it doesn't become law without the president's signature, and if he vetoes it, it may not be enacted at all (although Congress has the option of overriding the veto). Thus, the president is an immensely powerful presence throughout the legislative process despite his small constitutional role.
and alan grayson fillibustered and he was never in the senate explain that
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 Here is where you are wrong The House first passes a bill then the Senate passes a similar bill, then it goes for reconciliation and then a final bill is passed to the President desk for a signature. Remember the health care bill. Again take civics and lay off the crack.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 the president still needs to veto or sign before anything else can happen and BUSH FUCKING SIGNED THE PATRIOT ACT YOU MORON and you said congressmen cant fillibuster I PROVED YOU WRONG WITH THAT BECAUSE ALAN GRAYSON HAS FILLIBUSTERED THINGS and hes not in the senate he is just in congress and you were acting like BUSH DIDNT SIGN THE BILL WHEN HE FUCKING DID YOU PRICK
kazooga1234 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 I never Bush didnt sign the Patriot Act you CRACKHEAD what I said was he couldnt have signed it unless the House and Senate Passed it with the Help of Both ProgressaCunts and Neocuts alike. Just like Obama with NDAA, is that clear enough for you. Probably not.
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 BUSH DID SIGN THE PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING MORON AND I CAN PROVE THAT IN A PM IF YOU WANT ME TO he had to because nobody gave a shit to push it through and BUSH WANTED IT YOU FUCKING MORON for you to say that i want proof on it then give me the link that says bush never signed it because everything i found says BUSH SIGNED THE PATRIOT ACT he never vetoed it
kazooga1234 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kazooga1234 Admit the truth there is no shame in being retarded or brain damaged. What happened did your mommy have you vaccinated as a baby? This explains your ignorance and incoherent sentences. Its too bad you chose to be a ProgressaCunt and drink the koolaid, but being brain damaged, I know you cant help it.
truthout911 1 month ago
@kazooga1234 I see from your profile and your video you produced that you are really retarded and you age is really a handicap for you so I will forgive your ignorance and stupidity because you just cant help yourself. Just make sure your Mommy comes to clean you up and wipe the droll off your chin. LOLOLOLOL
truthout911 1 month ago
@truthout911 thats not my video thats a P4A as in project for awesome a video to stop world suck and yes its a cause i enjoy but its only added to my favs you moron not one i uploaded myself and you did say that bush didnt pass the PATRIOT ACT in this comment when you called me kazoogacunt you shouldnt have made it so ovious that you were such a moron
kazooga1234 1 month ago
Comment removed
truthout911 1 month ago