@Issa618 boohoo! cry me a river. You see the lightsaber growing on dislike bar? Still i manage to learn a second language. You still struggle with fundamental concepts obvious to a 3rd grader. Way to go idiot!
@linkuei83 What is remarkable about your comments is that you do not tell me why you think I am stupid or what in my video proves me to be stupid. You just leave insulting comments. You have not made any point here at all. Have you made any videos that prove me wrong?
@Issa618 actually what is remarkable is that you can't think straight for 10 seconds. I don't have any of my own videos, because there are plenty on a variety of topics that prove you wrong. The title alone is wrong. Jesus, didn't walk on water, no miracles, not to mention your pathetic description box. "Do you believe all that atheism is". Atheist is a reject of belief. If you can't get this straight, no wonder any further discussion is pointless.
@linkuei83 What I can say in response is that it is you that is wrong on all accounts. I will also add you are a nasty person and no one should want to associate with anything you ascribe to. You are a perfectly ugly version of everything I am opposed to.
@hojoapp Thank you for taking the handful of seconds it took to type your feedback. Oh, the length of the video is one minute and thirty-two seconds. Perhaps you thought it was so bad it seemed like it lasted a minute longer than it did.
"You simply have to explain away too much!" Because when presented with an argument, an atheist usually has to piece his argument so that even a blathering idiot can understand.
@Lightscribe225 The only thing I understand about Atheism, no matter who presents that side of the argument, is that its very foundation is false. Everything else that might be present is going to nonsensical or some type of strange equivocation. Try explaining away every single miracle, including those I've experienced and predicted, and all the words of prophets that came true. I'm waiting...
@Issa618 Sorry I couldn't understand your video all I gathered was how a lot of writings were edited. Basically I'll just say atheism is rejection of a divine being creating us. The basis is "Does it exist? Prove it." And so far the only thing used to prove the existence of god has been circular logic.
@Lightscribe225 Wrong on all accounts. Had you read any copy of the Bible before June 30, 2006 and then read the appropriate section after eleven months had passed you would know I am telling you the truth. They all changed, by God's hand. You chose not to believe me; that is your choice. There are consequences, however.
@Lightscribe225 Apparently, you are unable to comprehend "miracle." There have been many; but since they have not been widely reported I can understand why you resist accepting what I tell you is true. Everyone's copy has changed, repeatedly as I have described, since 1997. Just because God is unknowable and unseeable (as described by Buddha) does not mean you can accurately contradict what I tell you have been his "acts."
@KriegKadaver I can see you just posted a comment and did not watch my video. However, what your comment does reveal is that Atheism is unadulterated foolishness. Nothing more.
@Issa618 Yes I have watched the video, the fact that I didn't comment on the video itself does not imply that I didn't watch it. I asked a question specifically about the description. Obviously you got your head too far up your own ass to give a moderately educated response to any comment at all. Have a bad day sir.
I reject the belief that there is a deity up there or down there or somewhere, because there is no clear, real proof that there is, and when I ask anyone to bring forth said proof, they bring forward none. Only their faith.
And faith is not reality. Faith is not science. Faith is not logic because it doesn't require evidence.
That's awesome for believers... but it's insufficient for me.
Therefore, I reject claims of a deity and I reject the need for a religious dogma.
@Ital21 Reject what you want. I do not see you even attempting to discuss any of the points in this video. It is pointless for me to even address the comments of a close-minded person. I won't even tell you what you should read for the proof you could find because your attitude tells me you won't do that anyway.
@Ital21 If you want to learn more about the reiteration of my "ideas" please go to my blog at neobiblical.blogspot.com. Have a great day living in the world you created for yourself with your personal philosophy.
@Issa618 I don't see where you're planning to go with all your sarcasm, but I don't feel the need to explain myself to you. I commented on something that seemed appropriate for this video. If you dislike what norms I live by, that's your deal, but neither you nor your imaginary friends have any leverage over me to even scratch the surface you're trying to attack.
I have my own sense of self, and you have your own. Same with opinions.
@Issa618 Then add nothing. When you have actual arguments to counter another person's philosophy and ideas, then do so with debate.
Otherwise, stop trying to play the moral upground with videos like this one, which is a bad attempt at sarcasm and contributes nothing to the fight creationists try to bring up against science.
@Ital21 Let me be clear. There is nothing in this video, no any of my other videos, that defend the strict Creationist view. Not at all. I know our Creator exist, has existed and will always exist. Just because YOU think I should be part of the Creationist vs Evolutionist debate does not mean I have to. I am not against science. You are completely missing my point. Who are you to tell me what videos to make? All the statements in this video are on point, you have not countered any of it.
@Issa618 You are correct, and I agree. I didn't seem to understand that such was your stance. I meant no offense.
I DO back up what I said about the video: I don't see a point to counter in this video. In the end, all religion and religious books, artifacts, and paraphernalia are there, made by men, for men, and to be interpretative.
You're right, I was no better than what I claimed you were, but I don't retract my sentences about my rejection to belief. It's my choice to keep them.
@Issa618 Therefore I bid you farewell and I am sorry if I appeared more aggressive than what I intended. I do take part in the creationist vs. "evolutionists" (should be "non-creationists" really) but I can't make you take part.
TBH, I originally thought this video was made as a troll attempt on jesus-freaks, considering the title and all, as I didn't see a clear objective or point being made.
So my mistake on some percentage. No point dragging this further.
@Ital21 Okay. I want to ask you one last question before you go. I noticed you use Albert Einstein as your avatar. Would you agree with me and Al that "God does not play dice...?"
@Issa618 I do not. There is no imaginary entity that plays the table game us humans invented.
IF you are referring to the rhetorical question, then I agree that there is no randomness in the universe, there is a dynamic imbalance. Just like there is no zero degrees Kelvin, only -3° black body radiation.
There is also no evidence of a creator. There are unbalanced encounters of matter and energy that SEEM random, and might be, but they also obey laws.
@Issa618 My admiration is due to Einstein's mind, not his personal beliefs. I wouldn't follow his personal beliefs nor would I choose them as a way or mold for my life because that is neither practical nor demonstrably efficient for any objective. Now, if you think I am arrogant, well that falls under the category of all derogatory words you called me in previous replies, and I believe we are done with those topics by now, so I'll just retype the fact that your opinion of me does not concern me.
@Issa618 The assertion by Einstein is about randomness vs. determinism. All scientists advocate the view that emergent organisms do so not due to randomness, but due to deterministic qualities of nature.
This is the focus of studies in abiogenesis and also in cosmogeny. The basis is to acknowledge that complex formations follow not randomness or predisposed patterns, but the idea that from chaos can come order.
Does that answer your question more elaborately? I hope it does.
@Ital21 You should accept Einstein as a whole. If you really respected him, you would accept all of what he professed. His use of the term God was not completely metaphorical. However, I am certain if he gave me a chance to show him evidence he would be open to seeing it. Ignoring evidence is not scientific at all.
Why? Because it's your opinion that I should do so?
"If you really respected him, you would accept all of what he professed."
Again, Why? Why do as you say? If Einstein cheated on his wife, should I, out of respect to his ways, cheat on mine? If Einstein renounced his nationality, for whatever reason, should I renounce mine to mimic him?
@Ital21 Now you make me laugh. Atheists pick and chose amongst Einstein's quotes to support their False position. Einstein believed, whether you accept it or not.
@Issa618 All I said is that I live my life not according to Albert Einstein. I don't know what you're understanding from me, but let me say it again: I do not live my life as a parallel image to Albert Einstein's life.
I admire his work on physics. That's it. I don't look like him, I don't talk like him (german), I don't share his nationality(ies), and I don't want to.
The image avatar you see in my channel is just that: an image avatar.
IF you wanna derive conclusions from that, go ahead.
@Issa618 But I do have to question here, should you derive those arguments from 1 image avatar in some individual's channel: aren't you making a pretty darn childish argument with that as your starting point?
You see my channel with 1 particular icon, so therefore I AM that icon? Or I strive to be that icon?
You really can't see how that is infantile?
If I see a christian with an avatar depicting a common drawing of how jesus supposedly look, should I then assume that person IS jesus?
@Ital21 I looked at your avatar and thought you made that choice for a reason. I did not say you looked like him. Your reading and comprehension skills leave a lot to be desired.
@Issa618 The idea is that you're comparing me to your concept of who Einstein was and since I do not live up to what you apparently "think" I should be, look like, do, think, and type, you're basis for arguing that my personal philosophy is flawed and wrong is no better than what you claim I do vs. this videos arguments (or lack thereof), and vs. yourself in general.
You typed:
"You apparently watched this video and did not consider the statements. Clearly, you just don't like my face."
@Ital21 Keep adding as many comments as you like to this video's page. I have much better things to do with my time than respond to a lying and nonsensical troll.
@Issa618 Those two ideas do not naturally or logically follow each other except in light of this video, which I already commented was TO MY OPINION bad BECAUSE it lacked any real concise answer to any of the declarations you type (as if they were statements that came from your nemesis or whatever you believe your philosophical counterpart is), and through this video you just attempt to show mockery and disagreement, but no real counter-arguments about ANYTHING.
@Issa618 This video is bad because of the lack of concise ideas in it. Not because of your face. You implying I judge by other people's face is probably the worst you could have insinuated of me, even worse than the theological remarks (or lack thereof) you typed. Specially since you don't know me at all to be able to say that.
That's all I was doing in my replies to your initial replies: I was expressing my opinion.
We haven't discussed any evidence. You raised a rhetorical question, and I answered intellectually. I tackled the problem with the question (one you did not fully elaborate on, and you should've, as it is a question that demands context be laid beforehand) you asked, and I did it in the context of randomness vs. observed determinism. Are you saying I should bring you evidence deterministic naturalism is true?
@Ital21 I thought you were leaving. Do you ever tell the truth? I have provided evidence in the video and in the others. Watch my sermon videos, more than enough evidence is there. You apparently watched this video and did not consider the statements. Clearly, you just don't like my face.
@Issa618 Oh buddy... really? You really went back to the topic?
You asked me a question and I answered in a much more adjusted context than the one you were intending. You're obviously religious, and it is also obvious you aren't a physics mayor. If you were, you'd understand the context of "God does not play dice".
That was the last topic you wanted to tackle with me. But, since I obviously didn't grant you 100% righteousness for asking me that question, you're now back on the previous topic.
@Issa618 So what's it gonna be, buddy? I already said I was done with this video and it's very blatant lack of new arguments vs. someone making faces in light of them. It's not new, it's not innovative, and it sparks no interest. It has very little views. And that's all just stating facts.
IF you want to go on the topic of science vs. religion, go ahead, but to me it seems that you neither have a firm grasp on theological concepts, nor do you spot the tried-and-tested declarations you make.
@Issa618 Now, you suddenly introduce new notions to the topic YOU YOURSELF asked me. Suddenly it's about "ignoring scientific evidence", or "not living my life like Einstein would want me to in your eyes" or a myriad more, but the question was "Would I agree with you and Al (as if you were best buddies, lol@delusions)".
Don't turn this whole notion introduced BY YOU into a big no-true-Scotsman fallacy on me. You came up with Einstein's quote, you gotta understand it b4 you use it. You don't.
@Issa618 Now if you wanna get out of the notion YOU YOURSELF brought up as a question to me, at least go out with your head facing the right direction. Don't run into intellectual bumps and then blame me for pushing you unto them. Don't act immature and say "Clearly, you just don't like my face." as if your face were the reason you started arguing with me in the 1st place.
I didn't even mention your face, buddy.
FOCUS, please.
And with that, I really think I've reached your mental finale.
I would just say that I have not found physical evidence for divine intervention therefore I have no reason to believe in a god that intervenes in the physical world.
@Nihilist127 Maybe if you read the text in this video and BELIEVED I was telling you the truth there would be evidence you could find at the library. I will not expend any more energy on you until you do.
@Issa618 I can't believe you if you just claim things without evidence. Now I have done research on Jesus, and found that what few documents out side the bible that even mention him don't even reference him as an existing entity just something those Christians worship. Now there is Josephus yet for an orthodox Jew he sure seems willing to call Jesus the messiah. There is a good probability that Josephus' text was altered by a christian later on. See energy was expended. :)
@Issa618 I just dispute the way things are worded. Then again I quite dislike absolutes. For example "there is no supernatural" Everything I've seen has been better explained (and supported by evidence) by the natural. However this gives me no reason to believe that the super natural doesn't exist. The possibility is still there it may be the best explanation for something in the future however I have no reason to believe in it at this time.
@Nihilist127 Obviously you have not considered the statements in my video are true. Perhaps you would like to ignore my 34 other videos. You could also turn a blind eye to my blog (MySpace look for felixducat) where there are over 700 blogs you can NOT read. Also be sure NOT to go to my web site (mentioned on my YT page) Ignorance is bliss, no?
@Issa618 It's foolish to consider any claim without evidence to be true. You don't support your statements with any facts. So why should I consider them to be true?
your video is total fail because you only have text scroll across your screen and say nothing to refute them. and in your description you say atheists have to much to explain, the world over is trying to unlock the mysteries of the universe wile people like you just claim it was all god, science is explaining more and more every day wile that shallow pool of what god says to be true is getting smaller and smaller. also what was that i don't exist nor will i ever exist?
If one accepts Christ (Or whoever, for that matter), their life may change, but not because of an omnipotent presence. It's because of their mindset, and the new community they joined.
Religion is faith. Religion in itself, is good. But the perversion of Religion is what causes exploitation of its followers, and the condemning of others.
Miracles, loosely defined, do exist. Again, not caused by a higher presence.
@Dissruptance We have very different definitions of miracle. A miracle is a "violation" of the laws of physics, gravity, nature, and so on. When the impossible happens. These cannot occur without Divine Intervention.
Perhaps today's message from God is on CNN? There is a video there about a soldier who flat-lined for 15 minutes and then came back with no brain damage. Is is because it was a miracle or do we still not understand medical science nearly as well as we should?
I would like to point out to anyone who watched this video I made, all by myself, starring me, is not about EVOLUTION. It is about succinctly proving God's existence and how ATHEISM cannot be correct. Go ahead and hijack the topic if you want.
so you believe that a magic invisible man,living in the sky,created everything out of nothing,out of materials that did not exist.yeah......that makes total sense.........
OH MY GOD(figure of speech) you are very brainwashed ain't you.you have got to wake up and see the light.because that light is not god.its some moron flashing you in the eyes to blind you.
You think you know everything? Your ignorance is pathetic. The truth will be plain enough to you soon. I am sorry your parents did such an awful job raising you.
insults against my integrity,intelligence and my parents?
well how mature of you.
no human knows everything.i certainly do not.neither do you or anyone else who ever lived.
and if "god" wanted me to believe all he had to do was to give me a sign.because i do not just assume that there is a "god" before i am provided with valid evidence of such.
i should have known better than to argue against narrow minded people.
i am going to block you now,so please do not contact me anymore.
There is nothing more pathetic than someone who refuses to look at the evidence objectively, picks a fight like a spoiled child, then tries to make it look like they are taking the high ground, and covering their ears, eyes, and mouth.
He also think God has to give him a sign. Scriptures have changed all over the world for years now. Had you opened the book, and knew where to look, you would have received the sign years ago.
@Issa618 i would have known what gods word is if he wanted me to(if he exists)
i do not trust in scripture which has passed down trough the corrupt hands of men and have been censored and rewritten numerous times throughout history.
giving the immense capacity of intelligence we humans posses,it would have been a GRAVE insult to a higher being if i where to just blindly accept what other PEOPLE tell me to put my faith in.
@geometrololi Corrupt or not, they have changed the way I said they would. These are works of the Holy Spirit. They cannot be denied. I said so 2,000 years ago and I echo it again these days. You act as if you understand God, which is not entirely possible or you would be God. Again, if hubris were money you would be wealthy.
@geometrololi Im not quite sure your examplifying this "immense capacity of intelligience we humans posess." And it would be also a GRAVE insult to ignore the God breathed bible he puts in front of your face too.
@geometrololi yeah but see the thing here is if God were to give you a sign you would just find every possible way to "explain" it away. In other words you need to believe to see rather than see to believe.
@geometrololi Some are just too arrogant to believe even if its right in front of your face. For example you could see me trying to help you understand God as a sign but you dont you just see it as someone "forcing their belief down your throat" Which isnt really fair of me to say that thats what you think but I believe you do by the way you talk of God and talk to believers of God.
@tricia7771 you claiming that you have proof when they have been disproved time and time again by every single section of science wont cut it.
only actual evidence will convince me.
or if your god where to appear,not beleiving in his exisance would be pointless,it would have been unrefutable.
but your god only seems to have appeared to people so long back that it is impossible to establish whether it happened or not,and seeing all the contradictions,it seems like rather fishy buissnes.
@geometrololi I mean what is a human next to GOD? What is the creaton to the creator? How can you "demand" GOD show himself while denying his existance. Denying in fact your existance. Your reason for being here.
@geometrololi It seems almost really egotistical to me that peiople entertain the idea wqhen they dont believe in him that IF he does indeed exist he would appear to you just to prove his existance
@geometrololi well, see I dont agree with the "scientific way" and I understand what your saying and I guess it makes sense. But you know also..I cant help but thinkj of why on Earth would GOD appear to people that don't believe in him. Whats the point? ....
@tricia7771 Some people have a really bad attitude about God anyway. Honestly, someone told me, in a similar online environment, he would believe what I was telling him if God would "make testicles appear" on his forehead. Is that bizarre, or what? I could have responded in several ways (including several variations on the tea bagger joke) but could best respond to this type of nonsense with "I pray God does make testicles appear..." This man will probably never "get it."
@MatterEngineer I admit I get a strange thrill when I read posts about what people think God should be doing for them. How about figuring out what God wants YOU to do? I hope he pities you for your self-centered-ness. You know, because time IS running out.
@Issa618 One of the main contributing factors of a well-going relationship is communication. If I and God were lovers, for a wild instance, and he wished for me to do something for him. Would it not make the relationship more fluid if he simply told me what he would like me to do, rather than expect that I know-- isn't that in itself indeed quite selfish on his behalf?
@MatterEngineer No, He gave us rules to follow. It is our duty as believers to pass those along and teach "from generation to generation" about the things He told us about; what we are to do and not do. His rules are timeless and perfect. They do not need updating. All YOU have to do is pick a book and read.
@MatterEngineer That is a very good question. There are so many variations on the Bible. I have a translation, a three volume set copyright 1978, that has the best translation of the Five books of Moses, the Prophets, and the Writings. I do not have it near me now so I cannot tell you the publisher. I will add that later. New Testament versions vary widely. I recommend reading several of them to really comprehend them.
@tricia7771 wait a second....isn't that what you people claim?that god created everything out of nothing,just 'POOF'ed everything in to existence?and who or what so ever then was responsible for the creation of your god?who 'POOF'ed him in to existence?its called an infinite regress,it does not work.consider your arguments before you talk.
the theory of evolution is the theory which has more evidence than any other theory in history supporting it.there is less evidence for gravity.GRAVITY.
@geometrololi hm. so you insult our belief but yet you just admitted that your belief is practically the same thing. We believe in an always existant creator that we dont know where he/she comes from thats the whole point of IAM and is and always will be... where you believe in nothing that creates everything? Which is more pathetic? You insult our belief when technically speacking, really yours is no different.
@tricia7771 evolution does not in any way prove how the universe came by happening,neither is it meant for that purpose,thats the big bang theory.its not meant to explain the orgins of life either,evolution is just designed to explain the evolution of all the different species of animals AFTER life was established on earth.
and we arent even a 100% sure,but we openly admit it.
you claim to have the anwer,thats not the scientific way,one has to have actual evidence to support ones claims.
@geometrololi Do you know that the density of space is so finely tuned that were it off by 1 part in hundred million billion billion billion billion billion(thats a 10 followed by 53 zeros!) life could not exist. Creation freak accident? I dont think sooo! So believe what you want. It just shows you to be a fool.
@geometrololi Evolution is a theory. Gravity is a law. More proof of gravity. I believe "panspermia" describes life as it is best. Laws, like gravity, are predictive. Evolution is not. That is why it is still just a theory.
@Issa618 yes it is a law of nature,because WE defined it as one,its still a theory,but the thing is,all knowledge is incomplete,we cant with a 100% certianty say that its correct,but we are sure to a high degree.of the two theorys:evolution and gravity,evolution has more evidence and support than gravity by far,and gravity is a very sure thing.1050000 papers have been released on the subject of evolution,each and every one of those are in support of it.
intelligent, ain't one of your strong suits, is it.
linkuei83 6 days ago
@linkuei83 Grammar and punctuation is not one of yours.
Issa618 5 days ago
@Issa618 boohoo! cry me a river. You see the lightsaber growing on dislike bar? Still i manage to learn a second language. You still struggle with fundamental concepts obvious to a 3rd grader. Way to go idiot!
linkuei83 4 days ago
@linkuei83 What is remarkable about your comments is that you do not tell me why you think I am stupid or what in my video proves me to be stupid. You just leave insulting comments. You have not made any point here at all. Have you made any videos that prove me wrong?
Issa618 4 days ago
@Issa618 actually what is remarkable is that you can't think straight for 10 seconds. I don't have any of my own videos, because there are plenty on a variety of topics that prove you wrong. The title alone is wrong. Jesus, didn't walk on water, no miracles, not to mention your pathetic description box. "Do you believe all that atheism is". Atheist is a reject of belief. If you can't get this straight, no wonder any further discussion is pointless.
linkuei83 4 days ago
@linkuei83 What I can say in response is that it is you that is wrong on all accounts. I will also add you are a nasty person and no one should want to associate with anything you ascribe to. You are a perfectly ugly version of everything I am opposed to.
Issa618 4 days ago
Well that was a waste of 2 minute 32 seconds...
hojoapp 6 months ago
@hojoapp Thank you for taking the handful of seconds it took to type your feedback. Oh, the length of the video is one minute and thirty-two seconds. Perhaps you thought it was so bad it seemed like it lasted a minute longer than it did.
Issa618 6 months ago
"You simply have to explain away too much!" Because when presented with an argument, an atheist usually has to piece his argument so that even a blathering idiot can understand.
Lightscribe225 6 months ago
@Lightscribe225 The only thing I understand about Atheism, no matter who presents that side of the argument, is that its very foundation is false. Everything else that might be present is going to nonsensical or some type of strange equivocation. Try explaining away every single miracle, including those I've experienced and predicted, and all the words of prophets that came true. I'm waiting...
Issa618 6 months ago
@Issa618 Please tell me which miracles you are talking about. As a buddhist, my knowledge of it is limited.
Lightscribe225 6 months ago
@Lightscribe225 The "Short Sermon" video I made address that very subject. I'm sorry YouTube does not let me paste a link to my own videos here.
Issa618 6 months ago
@Issa618 Sorry I couldn't understand your video all I gathered was how a lot of writings were edited. Basically I'll just say atheism is rejection of a divine being creating us. The basis is "Does it exist? Prove it." And so far the only thing used to prove the existence of god has been circular logic.
Lightscribe225 6 months ago
@Lightscribe225 Wrong on all accounts. Had you read any copy of the Bible before June 30, 2006 and then read the appropriate section after eleven months had passed you would know I am telling you the truth. They all changed, by God's hand. You chose not to believe me; that is your choice. There are consequences, however.
Issa618 6 months ago
@Issa618 No that was the publisher who changed it. I wouldn't know as I said, I am not a christian.
Lightscribe225 6 months ago
@Lightscribe225 Apparently, you are unable to comprehend "miracle." There have been many; but since they have not been widely reported I can understand why you resist accepting what I tell you is true. Everyone's copy has changed, repeatedly as I have described, since 1997. Just because God is unknowable and unseeable (as described by Buddha) does not mean you can accurately contradict what I tell you have been his "acts."
Issa618 6 months ago
@Issa618 go ahead its your vid is it not?
matrixlone 7 months ago
"Do you believe all that Atheism is?" what is this? Atheism is THE LACK of belief.
KriegKadaver 7 months ago
@KriegKadaver I can see you just posted a comment and did not watch my video. However, what your comment does reveal is that Atheism is unadulterated foolishness. Nothing more.
Issa618 7 months ago
@Issa618 Yes I have watched the video, the fact that I didn't comment on the video itself does not imply that I didn't watch it. I asked a question specifically about the description. Obviously you got your head too far up your own ass to give a moderately educated response to any comment at all. Have a bad day sir.
KriegKadaver 7 months ago
@KriegKadaver but atheism sucks.
matrixlone 7 months ago
@matrixlone so does your mom.
KriegKadaver 7 months ago
@KriegKadaver Nah you must be talkin about atheism it sucks BAD just chek my playlist CAUSE DAAMN!!!
matrixlone 7 months ago
@KriegKadaver Not the type of response I would expect from a moderately educated person...
Issa618 7 months ago
@Issa618 yea baby jesus wins!!!!!!!!!
matrixlone 7 months ago
Posting 1 video on youtube neither proves nor disproves anything at all. Not christianity and not those who don't believe.
It's just a dude nodding and making faces. That's not even logic, it's just a showcase of sentences from 1 perspective.
Hardly arguments.
Ital21 1 year ago
I reject the belief that there is a deity up there or down there or somewhere, because there is no clear, real proof that there is, and when I ask anyone to bring forth said proof, they bring forward none. Only their faith.
And faith is not reality. Faith is not science. Faith is not logic because it doesn't require evidence.
That's awesome for believers... but it's insufficient for me.
Therefore, I reject claims of a deity and I reject the need for a religious dogma.
Simple.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 Reject what you want. I do not see you even attempting to discuss any of the points in this video. It is pointless for me to even address the comments of a close-minded person. I won't even tell you what you should read for the proof you could find because your attitude tells me you won't do that anyway.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I was speaking on personal philosophy.
And if you think it is pointless to address my comments, then why address me at all??
Where do you even propose this reiteration of ideas goes from here?
I spoke on what I see and discern from logic. Nothing more.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 If you want to learn more about the reiteration of my "ideas" please go to my blog at neobiblical.blogspot.com. Have a great day living in the world you created for yourself with your personal philosophy.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I don't see where you're planning to go with all your sarcasm, but I don't feel the need to explain myself to you. I commented on something that seemed appropriate for this video. If you dislike what norms I live by, that's your deal, but neither you nor your imaginary friends have any leverage over me to even scratch the surface you're trying to attack.
I have my own sense of self, and you have your own. Same with opinions.
This is free speech, buddy. Deal with it.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 I honestly don't. You've welcomed me with attempts at hurtful exchanges of ideas and with a closed mind.
I don't even think your video sparks true interest if you follow it from start to end, allowing continuity on it's statements.
You're just advocating a very rehearsed, old, and uninnovative perspective. I don't see why I should go to your blog and see more of that.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 I have nothing to add except that I have read what you typed.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 Then add nothing. When you have actual arguments to counter another person's philosophy and ideas, then do so with debate.
Otherwise, stop trying to play the moral upground with videos like this one, which is a bad attempt at sarcasm and contributes nothing to the fight creationists try to bring up against science.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 Let me be clear. There is nothing in this video, no any of my other videos, that defend the strict Creationist view. Not at all. I know our Creator exist, has existed and will always exist. Just because YOU think I should be part of the Creationist vs Evolutionist debate does not mean I have to. I am not against science. You are completely missing my point. Who are you to tell me what videos to make? All the statements in this video are on point, you have not countered any of it.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 You are correct, and I agree. I didn't seem to understand that such was your stance. I meant no offense.
I DO back up what I said about the video: I don't see a point to counter in this video. In the end, all religion and religious books, artifacts, and paraphernalia are there, made by men, for men, and to be interpretative.
You're right, I was no better than what I claimed you were, but I don't retract my sentences about my rejection to belief. It's my choice to keep them.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 Therefore I bid you farewell and I am sorry if I appeared more aggressive than what I intended. I do take part in the creationist vs. "evolutionists" (should be "non-creationists" really) but I can't make you take part.
TBH, I originally thought this video was made as a troll attempt on jesus-freaks, considering the title and all, as I didn't see a clear objective or point being made.
So my mistake on some percentage. No point dragging this further.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 Okay. I want to ask you one last question before you go. I noticed you use Albert Einstein as your avatar. Would you agree with me and Al that "God does not play dice...?"
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I do not. There is no imaginary entity that plays the table game us humans invented.
IF you are referring to the rhetorical question, then I agree that there is no randomness in the universe, there is a dynamic imbalance. Just like there is no zero degrees Kelvin, only -3° black body radiation.
There is also no evidence of a creator. There are unbalanced encounters of matter and energy that SEEM random, and might be, but they also obey laws.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, u see.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 I am sure Einstein would be very impressed the way you dissect him as if you knew what he meant better than he did. Such arrogance.
Issa618 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 My admiration is due to Einstein's mind, not his personal beliefs. I wouldn't follow his personal beliefs nor would I choose them as a way or mold for my life because that is neither practical nor demonstrably efficient for any objective. Now, if you think I am arrogant, well that falls under the category of all derogatory words you called me in previous replies, and I believe we are done with those topics by now, so I'll just retype the fact that your opinion of me does not concern me.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 The assertion by Einstein is about randomness vs. determinism. All scientists advocate the view that emergent organisms do so not due to randomness, but due to deterministic qualities of nature.
This is the focus of studies in abiogenesis and also in cosmogeny. The basis is to acknowledge that complex formations follow not randomness or predisposed patterns, but the idea that from chaos can come order.
Does that answer your question more elaborately? I hope it does.
Peace.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 You should accept Einstein as a whole. If you really respected him, you would accept all of what he professed. His use of the term God was not completely metaphorical. However, I am certain if he gave me a chance to show him evidence he would be open to seeing it. Ignoring evidence is not scientific at all.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 "You should accept Einstein as a whole."
Why? Because it's your opinion that I should do so?
"If you really respected him, you would accept all of what he professed."
Again, Why? Why do as you say? If Einstein cheated on his wife, should I, out of respect to his ways, cheat on mine? If Einstein renounced his nationality, for whatever reason, should I renounce mine to mimic him?
I think you fell into a logical fallacy there.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 Now you make me laugh. Atheists pick and chose amongst Einstein's quotes to support their False position. Einstein believed, whether you accept it or not.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I have not quoted Einstein at all in my replies. Which is the premise of this particular reply from you.
I don't know what you're reading, or mis-reading, but it's not what I type.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 Here you remind me of what Al said about "violent opposition from mediocre minds."
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 All I said is that I live my life not according to Albert Einstein. I don't know what you're understanding from me, but let me say it again: I do not live my life as a parallel image to Albert Einstein's life.
I admire his work on physics. That's it. I don't look like him, I don't talk like him (german), I don't share his nationality(ies), and I don't want to.
The image avatar you see in my channel is just that: an image avatar.
IF you wanna derive conclusions from that, go ahead.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 But I do have to question here, should you derive those arguments from 1 image avatar in some individual's channel: aren't you making a pretty darn childish argument with that as your starting point?
You see my channel with 1 particular icon, so therefore I AM that icon? Or I strive to be that icon?
You really can't see how that is infantile?
If I see a christian with an avatar depicting a common drawing of how jesus supposedly look, should I then assume that person IS jesus?
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 And where do you get off telling others that "THEY SHOULD" look like the avatar they chose for their channel?
How is that in any way mature? Or even slightly intelligible?
Can you not see the huge loophole you've created around your own argument?
Aren't you tired of not getting anywhere in both your video and your replies?
Don't you want to be arguably correct even once?
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 I looked at your avatar and thought you made that choice for a reason. I did not say you looked like him. Your reading and comprehension skills leave a lot to be desired.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I never said that you said I looked like him.
I said you said I should live my life like him just because I chose that avata.
You're clearly the one lacking in reading comprehension.
OR
You try to change facts to suit your mood and arguments.
Either way, it's shameful for an individual to act in such manner.
I imagine you'll find new, innovative ways of pinning this reply I typed, but in a negative manner, towards me or atheists or both.
Do you even read what I type?
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 I copied and pasted this from one of your above comments.
"And where do you get off telling others that "THEY SHOULD" look like the avatar they chose for their channel?"
You are not just ridiculous. You are a liar.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 The idea is that you're comparing me to your concept of who Einstein was and since I do not live up to what you apparently "think" I should be, look like, do, think, and type, you're basis for arguing that my personal philosophy is flawed and wrong is no better than what you claim I do vs. this videos arguments (or lack thereof), and vs. yourself in general.
You typed:
"You apparently watched this video and did not consider the statements. Clearly, you just don't like my face."
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 Keep adding as many comments as you like to this video's page. I have much better things to do with my time than respond to a lying and nonsensical troll.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 they why do you keep typing replies?
You asked me a question. I answered.
Why'd you ask if it you probably weren't going to like the answer to begin with?
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 Those two ideas do not naturally or logically follow each other except in light of this video, which I already commented was TO MY OPINION bad BECAUSE it lacked any real concise answer to any of the declarations you type (as if they were statements that came from your nemesis or whatever you believe your philosophical counterpart is), and through this video you just attempt to show mockery and disagreement, but no real counter-arguments about ANYTHING.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 This video is bad because of the lack of concise ideas in it. Not because of your face. You implying I judge by other people's face is probably the worst you could have insinuated of me, even worse than the theological remarks (or lack thereof) you typed. Specially since you don't know me at all to be able to say that.
That's all I was doing in my replies to your initial replies: I was expressing my opinion.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618
"Ignoring evidence is not scientific at all."
We haven't discussed any evidence. You raised a rhetorical question, and I answered intellectually. I tackled the problem with the question (one you did not fully elaborate on, and you should've, as it is a question that demands context be laid beforehand) you asked, and I did it in the context of randomness vs. observed determinism. Are you saying I should bring you evidence deterministic naturalism is true?
Ital21 1 year ago
@Ital21 I thought you were leaving. Do you ever tell the truth? I have provided evidence in the video and in the others. Watch my sermon videos, more than enough evidence is there. You apparently watched this video and did not consider the statements. Clearly, you just don't like my face.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 Oh buddy... really? You really went back to the topic?
You asked me a question and I answered in a much more adjusted context than the one you were intending. You're obviously religious, and it is also obvious you aren't a physics mayor. If you were, you'd understand the context of "God does not play dice".
That was the last topic you wanted to tackle with me. But, since I obviously didn't grant you 100% righteousness for asking me that question, you're now back on the previous topic.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 So what's it gonna be, buddy? I already said I was done with this video and it's very blatant lack of new arguments vs. someone making faces in light of them. It's not new, it's not innovative, and it sparks no interest. It has very little views. And that's all just stating facts.
IF you want to go on the topic of science vs. religion, go ahead, but to me it seems that you neither have a firm grasp on theological concepts, nor do you spot the tried-and-tested declarations you make.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 Now, you suddenly introduce new notions to the topic YOU YOURSELF asked me. Suddenly it's about "ignoring scientific evidence", or "not living my life like Einstein would want me to in your eyes" or a myriad more, but the question was "Would I agree with you and Al (as if you were best buddies, lol@delusions)".
Don't turn this whole notion introduced BY YOU into a big no-true-Scotsman fallacy on me. You came up with Einstein's quote, you gotta understand it b4 you use it. You don't.
Ital21 1 year ago
@Issa618 Now if you wanna get out of the notion YOU YOURSELF brought up as a question to me, at least go out with your head facing the right direction. Don't run into intellectual bumps and then blame me for pushing you unto them. Don't act immature and say "Clearly, you just don't like my face." as if your face were the reason you started arguing with me in the 1st place.
I didn't even mention your face, buddy.
FOCUS, please.
And with that, I really think I've reached your mental finale.
Bye.
Ital21 1 year ago
I would just say that I have not found physical evidence for divine intervention therefore I have no reason to believe in a god that intervenes in the physical world.
Nihilist127 1 year ago
@Nihilist127 Maybe if you read the text in this video and BELIEVED I was telling you the truth there would be evidence you could find at the library. I will not expend any more energy on you until you do.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I can't believe you if you just claim things without evidence. Now I have done research on Jesus, and found that what few documents out side the bible that even mention him don't even reference him as an existing entity just something those Christians worship. Now there is Josephus yet for an orthodox Jew he sure seems willing to call Jesus the messiah. There is a good probability that Josephus' text was altered by a christian later on. See energy was expended. :)
Nihilist127 1 year ago
@Nihilist127 Well done. What part of MY video do you dispute?
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I just dispute the way things are worded. Then again I quite dislike absolutes. For example "there is no supernatural" Everything I've seen has been better explained (and supported by evidence) by the natural. However this gives me no reason to believe that the super natural doesn't exist. The possibility is still there it may be the best explanation for something in the future however I have no reason to believe in it at this time.
Nihilist127 1 year ago
@Nihilist127 I am the Messiah. Absolutely. Whether you like it or not.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I don't suppose you could prove this?
Nihilist127 1 year ago
@Nihilist127 Obviously you have not considered the statements in my video are true. Perhaps you would like to ignore my 34 other videos. You could also turn a blind eye to my blog (MySpace look for felixducat) where there are over 700 blogs you can NOT read. Also be sure NOT to go to my web site (mentioned on my YT page) Ignorance is bliss, no?
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 It's foolish to consider any claim without evidence to be true. You don't support your statements with any facts. So why should I consider them to be true?
Nihilist127 1 year ago
jesus destroys.. DESTROYS DESTROYYYYYYYSSS JESUS WILL COME IN UR SLEEP AND DESTROY UNBELIEVERS FROM WITHIN!!!
love jesus
Samura1gamer 1 year ago
your video is total fail because you only have text scroll across your screen and say nothing to refute them. and in your description you say atheists have to much to explain, the world over is trying to unlock the mysteries of the universe wile people like you just claim it was all god, science is explaining more and more every day wile that shallow pool of what god says to be true is getting smaller and smaller. also what was that i don't exist nor will i ever exist?
fail fail fail fail fail
thew00lybully 1 year ago
@thew00lybully Actually YOU only saw what you want in my video and do not address any of the points I make. I give you only ONE fail.
Issa618 1 year ago
If one accepts Christ (Or whoever, for that matter), their life may change, but not because of an omnipotent presence. It's because of their mindset, and the new community they joined.
Religion is faith. Religion in itself, is good. But the perversion of Religion is what causes exploitation of its followers, and the condemning of others.
Miracles, loosely defined, do exist. Again, not caused by a higher presence.
Not sure if my thoughts are "Athiesm" or not.
Dissruptance 1 year ago
@Dissruptance We have very different definitions of miracle. A miracle is a "violation" of the laws of physics, gravity, nature, and so on. When the impossible happens. These cannot occur without Divine Intervention.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618
Alright, well then those miracles do not happen.
Dissruptance 1 year ago
Perhaps today's message from God is on CNN? There is a video there about a soldier who flat-lined for 15 minutes and then came back with no brain damage. Is is because it was a miracle or do we still not understand medical science nearly as well as we should?
Issa618 1 year ago
I would like to point out to anyone who watched this video I made, all by myself, starring me, is not about EVOLUTION. It is about succinctly proving God's existence and how ATHEISM cannot be correct. Go ahead and hijack the topic if you want.
Issa618 1 year ago
funny side note:
isn't it written in the bible NOT to mix fabric?i could have sworn that shit was in there.
you don't seem to care.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi oh funny. You read and believe in the bible when it applies to YOU. Arrogance.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@geometrololi Perhaps because you refer to what is written in the Bible as "shit."
Issa618 1 year ago
so you believe that a magic invisible man,living in the sky,created everything out of nothing,out of materials that did not exist.yeah......that makes total sense.........
geometrololi 2 years ago
God knows it when you talk trash about him like that.
Issa618 2 years ago
OH MY GOD(figure of speech) you are very brainwashed ain't you.you have got to wake up and see the light.because that light is not god.its some moron flashing you in the eyes to blind you.
geometrololi 2 years ago
You think you know everything? Your ignorance is pathetic. The truth will be plain enough to you soon. I am sorry your parents did such an awful job raising you.
Issa618 2 years ago
insults against my integrity,intelligence and my parents?
well how mature of you.
no human knows everything.i certainly do not.neither do you or anyone else who ever lived.
and if "god" wanted me to believe all he had to do was to give me a sign.because i do not just assume that there is a "god" before i am provided with valid evidence of such.
i should have known better than to argue against narrow minded people.
i am going to block you now,so please do not contact me anymore.
geometrololi 2 years ago
There is nothing more pathetic than someone who refuses to look at the evidence objectively, picks a fight like a spoiled child, then tries to make it look like they are taking the high ground, and covering their ears, eyes, and mouth.
He also think God has to give him a sign. Scriptures have changed all over the world for years now. Had you opened the book, and knew where to look, you would have received the sign years ago.
Issa618 2 years ago
@Issa618 i would have known what gods word is if he wanted me to(if he exists)
i do not trust in scripture which has passed down trough the corrupt hands of men and have been censored and rewritten numerous times throughout history.
giving the immense capacity of intelligence we humans posses,it would have been a GRAVE insult to a higher being if i where to just blindly accept what other PEOPLE tell me to put my faith in.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi Corrupt or not, they have changed the way I said they would. These are works of the Holy Spirit. They cannot be denied. I said so 2,000 years ago and I echo it again these days. You act as if you understand God, which is not entirely possible or you would be God. Again, if hubris were money you would be wealthy.
Issa618 1 year ago
@geometrololi Im not quite sure your examplifying this "immense capacity of intelligience we humans posess." And it would be also a GRAVE insult to ignore the God breathed bible he puts in front of your face too.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@Issa618 i realize that i was unreasonable at one point in my response,in that i blocked you so fast.*unblock*
i stand by my other points though.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi yeah but see the thing here is if God were to give you a sign you would just find every possible way to "explain" it away. In other words you need to believe to see rather than see to believe.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@geometrololi Some are just too arrogant to believe even if its right in front of your face. For example you could see me trying to help you understand God as a sign but you dont you just see it as someone "forcing their belief down your throat" Which isnt really fair of me to say that thats what you think but I believe you do by the way you talk of God and talk to believers of God.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@tricia7771 you claiming that you have proof when they have been disproved time and time again by every single section of science wont cut it.
only actual evidence will convince me.
or if your god where to appear,not beleiving in his exisance would be pointless,it would have been unrefutable.
but your god only seems to have appeared to people so long back that it is impossible to establish whether it happened or not,and seeing all the contradictions,it seems like rather fishy buissnes.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi I mean what is a human next to GOD? What is the creaton to the creator? How can you "demand" GOD show himself while denying his existance. Denying in fact your existance. Your reason for being here.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@geometrololi It seems almost really egotistical to me that peiople entertain the idea wqhen they dont believe in him that IF he does indeed exist he would appear to you just to prove his existance
tricia7771 1 year ago
@geometrololi well, see I dont agree with the "scientific way" and I understand what your saying and I guess it makes sense. But you know also..I cant help but thinkj of why on Earth would GOD appear to people that don't believe in him. Whats the point? ....
tricia7771 1 year ago
@tricia7771 Some people have a really bad attitude about God anyway. Honestly, someone told me, in a similar online environment, he would believe what I was telling him if God would "make testicles appear" on his forehead. Is that bizarre, or what? I could have responded in several ways (including several variations on the tea bagger joke) but could best respond to this type of nonsense with "I pray God does make testicles appear..." This man will probably never "get it."
Issa618 1 year ago
@geometrololi btw Im sorry I had to break up my answer to you like that lol couldnt fit it all in one.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@Issa618 Why should God care?
MatterEngineer 1 year ago
@MatterEngineer That is a very good question that only God can answer.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 Well it is rather a pity he cannot put me at-ease and simply tell me why he should give a fart toward the plights of us mortal men. :-(
MatterEngineer 1 year ago
@MatterEngineer I admit I get a strange thrill when I read posts about what people think God should be doing for them. How about figuring out what God wants YOU to do? I hope he pities you for your self-centered-ness. You know, because time IS running out.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 One of the main contributing factors of a well-going relationship is communication. If I and God were lovers, for a wild instance, and he wished for me to do something for him. Would it not make the relationship more fluid if he simply told me what he would like me to do, rather than expect that I know-- isn't that in itself indeed quite selfish on his behalf?
MatterEngineer 1 year ago
@MatterEngineer No, He gave us rules to follow. It is our duty as believers to pass those along and teach "from generation to generation" about the things He told us about; what we are to do and not do. His rules are timeless and perfect. They do not need updating. All YOU have to do is pick a book and read.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 I need only read a book in-order to be enlightened by God's timeless and perfect rules (that evidently require no up-dating)?
Which book, if you assume all books convey the "good" word of the lord, would you have me read? (Please let it be the Bible)
MatterEngineer 1 year ago
@MatterEngineer That is a very good question. There are so many variations on the Bible. I have a translation, a three volume set copyright 1978, that has the best translation of the Five books of Moses, the Prophets, and the Writings. I do not have it near me now so I cannot tell you the publisher. I will add that later. New Testament versions vary widely. I recommend reading several of them to really comprehend them.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 Thanks. I look forward to it.
MatterEngineer 1 year ago
@MatterEngineer Jewish Publication Society copyright 1962 and printed in 1978. It also follows the "formatting" that the Hebrew does in the scrolls.
Issa618 1 year ago
@geometrololi yeah and it makes sense that absolutely nothing created everything. yeah......thgat makes total sense......
tricia7771 1 year ago
@tricia7771 Thank you.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 your welcome. lol =)
tricia7771 1 year ago
@tricia7771 wait a second....isn't that what you people claim?that god created everything out of nothing,just 'POOF'ed everything in to existence?and who or what so ever then was responsible for the creation of your god?who 'POOF'ed him in to existence?its called an infinite regress,it does not work.consider your arguments before you talk.
the theory of evolution is the theory which has more evidence than any other theory in history supporting it.there is less evidence for gravity.GRAVITY.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi hm. so you insult our belief but yet you just admitted that your belief is practically the same thing. We believe in an always existant creator that we dont know where he/she comes from thats the whole point of IAM and is and always will be... where you believe in nothing that creates everything? Which is more pathetic? You insult our belief when technically speacking, really yours is no different.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@tricia7771 evolution does not in any way prove how the universe came by happening,neither is it meant for that purpose,thats the big bang theory.its not meant to explain the orgins of life either,evolution is just designed to explain the evolution of all the different species of animals AFTER life was established on earth.
and we arent even a 100% sure,but we openly admit it.
you claim to have the anwer,thats not the scientific way,one has to have actual evidence to support ones claims.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi Do you know that the density of space is so finely tuned that were it off by 1 part in hundred million billion billion billion billion billion(thats a 10 followed by 53 zeros!) life could not exist. Creation freak accident? I dont think sooo! So believe what you want. It just shows you to be a fool.
tricia7771 1 year ago
@geometrololi Evolution is a theory. Gravity is a law. More proof of gravity. I believe "panspermia" describes life as it is best. Laws, like gravity, are predictive. Evolution is not. That is why it is still just a theory.
Issa618 1 year ago
@Issa618 yes it is a law of nature,because WE defined it as one,its still a theory,but the thing is,all knowledge is incomplete,we cant with a 100% certianty say that its correct,but we are sure to a high degree.of the two theorys:evolution and gravity,evolution has more evidence and support than gravity by far,and gravity is a very sure thing.1050000 papers have been released on the subject of evolution,each and every one of those are in support of it.
geometrololi 1 year ago
@geometrololi You are wrong. No amount of persuasion can turn you to the right side. The wicked will act wickedly and not understand.
Issa618 1 year ago