@ristuksenvittu ye you fucking retard, because i bet the guy was realy aiming at the dog and thinking "im gona hit that bastard at 200 km/h, fuck my bike and probably kill myself, but it will be worth it!!!"
fucking idiot go dig a hole and hide on hit for the rest of your life and save the rest of the world from being in contact with your stupidity
The dog was dead waaaay before impact. If you use your brain you would've noticed the front rider was inexperienced and didn't maneuver fast enough to get out of the way. The dog already had it's legs up and then the 2nd rider wich was more experienced hit it at about the same speed but was able to maintain his balance.
@Powermover001 If there's a race, there are people supposed to care about the security. So this dog isn't supposed to be here. And why are you pissing me off? Are you a member of that dog's family? Nope I guess, so leave me alone.
@HAUDEGENRUHRPOTT alter guck doch ma richtig hin!!! es ist ein reeh (ich weiß rudolph ist eigentlich ein rentier) guck dir mal den fell an!!! und wer lässt seinen köter den auf einer rennstrecke frei rumlaufen???
@momsbabyboy In Indien sind auch Hunde auf der Strecke oO Die sind auch Heerchenlos. Und in der Ukraine auch...heisst ja nicht das der wem gehören muss....
I dont know whether to like or dislike...sucks for the dog but I feel more for the racers, dumb dogs shouldnt run out in front of vehicles, deer freeze, I swear squirrels and rabbits are suicidal, hope crasher is alright.
40mph 40mph its 40mph crash (the speeds don't double)
like 40mph to the wall
Your thinking seems to be logic for most people but are against phisics law and are not true.. I let You lin to double check in the web because I am 100% sure that I have right. All.
vehicles' speeds become the velocity at which damage is produced"
Google for it, its basic physics.
What will hit someone harder: a train, that is standing still and person running into it at 10km/h, or a train running at 250km/h and a person running into it at 10km/h?
For more detailed explanation, google for "Q: Crashing cars - any difference?" please.
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Total energy for single car. Don't cherry pick, read to the end. Or rethink my sample with train. Approach incoming train running, compared to standing one :) Feel the energy :)
I mean, according to your view angle, bullets won't penetrate you, because you just stand there... You should be moving into them, so they have penetration, and this penetration energy will solely depend upon your speed?
Tell it to minigun, my friend :) I won't approach shooting minigun pointblank if I were you. Only those standing still :)
@lin545 OK so what if I gave you now link from youtube with total explanation and crashtests with view of cars hit wall then face-on show that I am comletly right ...are you send me apology every day for the next year then ??? .... We are talking about two same objects and you talk to me about the bullet and human ...this comperison told me that you don't know what are we talking about
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Go ahead, send it. Im not going to "send you apology every day for the next year", because I never requested such apology from yourself either. If you (and video) are correct and logically proven, I will send you "thank you" as in every normal human conversation.
Im not a prostitute or slave, so, sorry.
"We are talking about two same objects and you talk to me about the bullet and human"
To my knowledge,nature makes no exceptions, be it cars, bullets, or bill gates.
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Hey man, THANKS for the link. That was definately a brain braker for the past 24 hours, but I think I finally understood. The funny moment was that car was damaged MORE by wall, than by equial car itself if you watch closely.
There is energy(E) at moment of crash, E = car mass x speed.
At point of contact, the whole energy is thrown at target.
1) Because stone wall has near ultimate resistance(as its grounded, hard, massive, thick, heavy) - near 100% of own energy is thrown back at car.
2) In case of similar car at similar speed(energy), E1 + E2 = 200%, but this 200% are distributed along two cars. The resistance of car is additionally way less than that of wall, cars mass yields to crash energy(E) giving ammortizing effect. more:
The internal damage to car material is part of energy(E) that was not absorbed by ammortization(car flying back) - because of protective cage - more damage is ammortized back.
Amazing thing. I need your thoughts too.
Things what I want Mythbusters to do now:
1) Do same test, same cars, same speed, but take approaching car have two times the weight (just weight).
2) Crash car into the standing tree.
3) Crash car in wall(backuped by ~50 tons mass) moving at same speed.
Oh, forgot to add, the (E1 + E2)=Res1/Res2 thing at crash is dynamic, meaning if one of the objects is:
faster,
harder (sturdier),
heavier,
less ergonomic back(ie truck),
has heavyduty wheels
the energy *should be* be distributed more to a "weaker" target.
Meaning frontal head-on crash of lighter car into much heavier vehicle can become even more damaging than sum of their speeds. Speed turned out to be only a small factor of many.
@lin545 absolutely true. cyclists also pay much more attention to traffic and the street, because they need to. it's usually bad car drivers causing the accidents.
@lin545 IF You make frontal collision by 60 is still 60 .You don't make 60+60=120. its still 60. (Check physics or some forums around web if You don't believe me.)
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Frontal collision with approaching vehicle results in sum of speeds. Thats why example people get penetrated by bullets; or why it is possible to catch a bird flying in same direction.
Current euroncap tests are performed at 64km/h - this would mean either frontal collision with approaching vehicle at 32km/h both, or direct frontal collision with static object at 64km/h.
Means if you and appoaching driver both maintain correct speed (50km/h in city, 70 km/h outside, 120+ on autobahn - in europe) the effective collision speed will be 100, 140 and 240 km/h correspodently.
As with each additional 10km/h the energy behind is doubled, frontal collision at 100km/h in city would mean 64 times greater impact strength than designed by protective cage.
The only hope for driver is collision with obstacle, not approaching vehicle.
Because collisions with pedestrians are tested at 40km/h (and minimal speed in city, in europe, is 50km/h), the only way where this test is valid - is that driver already engaged brakes and deaccelerated to 40km/h.
Side or back collisions are tested at much lower speed - there is way less hope.
The whole ncap tests are unrealistic in 80% of cases and they already (!) are aware about it.
Maybe they will redesign tests soon, I heard minimum 100 km/h was suggested.
@lin545 your facts and theories are so distorted and twisted (e.g. 60km/h, 30km/h...that is some serious bad physics) that it becomes incomprehensible to any logical reasoning. The REAL fact is that you are much much more likely to be SERIOUSLY or FATALLY hurt if you ride a motorcycle in comparison to when you drive a car. To illustrate, my own mother totaled her car (70km/h plus head on collision) 3 times and she got off with no injury whatsoever in all cases.
@gloomysuicidal My facts are direct and correct. Your subjective perception may vary. Speeds do sum up, energy does sum up, Einstein welcomes you.
The real fact, is that I didn't claim riding a bike is less dangerous than riding a bike. On the contrary, you claimed that riding a bike almost certainly will kill you. This is BS. Car and bike are different beasts - in weight/energy, in protection, in acceleration, in manuerability, in perception field, in driving style. contd:..
@lin545 "The real fact, is that I didn't claim riding a bike is less dangerous than riding a bike." ---> "...I didn't claim riding a bike is more secure than driving in a car".
Drivers are different too. Stuff can break. Crap can happen. People always call for security - (almost) perfect security can only happen if everything is discrete, integrated and harmonic. This is wrong world for that kind of fairy tale - I guess because this is path to ultimate dullness and souls need "fresh air". This world is not designed for ultimate security/golden cage of decadency. This why a lot of people start riding a bike instead of cars. contd2..:
@lin545 my cousin an avid motorcycle rider who rides a cbr1000rr almost every other day broke one of his legs, one of his ribs, fractures and suffered moderate concussion when his bike accidentally hit a tiny puddle on a highway and one of his tires lost traction. He has been riding for 20 years so he is very experienced and still he got injured from just a tiny puddle. If you still thinks that riding a motorcycle is not much much much more dangerous than driving a car then that is up to you.
@gloomysuicidal I saw people die in car accidents at 70km/h, I saw cars becoming meat sandwiches at highways, I saw people survive, because they were NOT strapped and have flied out of the frontal window.
But a car driver in a car that passed 5 ncap, --in case of unavoidable crash--, at speeds less than 65 km/h total, in case nothing else sums up, is very likely to outcome alive than --any-- bike. Bikes are like flies,..Given same total amount,do "flies" die more often than more "robust mice"?
NICE RURAL SPEED TRACK, FAST AND CURVY... IT WASN'T A DOG THO, IT WAS A BABY DEER THE FRONT RIDER HIT, FREEZE FRAME IT.
OUT OF ALL THE DOGS I'VE EVER SEEN, I'VE NEVER SEEN ONE WITH HOOVES!
BESIDES, WHAT DOG ROAMS FREE ON A BIKER TRACK, I SEE DEER ALL THE TIME AT THE MEADOWS SPEED RUN TRACK, THEY JUMP THE FENCE GIRDERS AND GET HIT LIKE THIS OFTEN, DEER ON TRACKS IS A REAL PROBLEM ON RURAL TRACKS.
If your learning how to drive a racemotor with professionals they learn you to NEVER swerve for an obsticle including a dog, they learn you to drive over a autoband at 60 km/h, its really hard but still you have to be able to do it.
I say poor dog before poor human. Just because humans in general are the most selfish and asshole animals on the face of the earth. Dogs on the other hand show more love than any other creature I've seen yet. You don't see a husband kissing her wife like crazy every time she walks in from work or whatever. Its just more sad to me. BUT as humans its important to take care of our species before others but dogs are just so loving... You understand if you have a dog. :(
Its not a dog. Its a small deer.
podervenezolano 2 hours ago
the dog was trying to slow them ..
varun12885833 12 hours ago
Stupid dog,now have Ferbony lost!!!
ManuuTorres 1 day ago
Press 6 :((((
xyperox 2 days ago
Fuck the dog , is a race track not a fucking pet shop, fucking retard
MrTURBOR1 1 week ago 2
More like Rip the guy! He fell off from that 200km/h crash. Plus it was the dog's fault for walking out like that! Where the hell is the owner?
XOSiren18XO 1 week ago
IF I WERE THE DRIVER, I WOULD KICK THE DOGS HEAD OFF !!!!
THE POOR BIKE :'(
GhostriderV8x 1 week ago
@GhostriderV8x you are an damn idiot .... we should kick you the head of you son of a bitch !
Malarunners6 1 week ago
@GhostriderV8x yea fuck you to cunt ill kick your head off
Jaydogdrummerboy256 1 week ago
no crash very good driver ;)
DarksFoxy 1 week ago
Respect for the good reaction (9 outta 10 would crash on the grass, that includes me I think)...
Thrux900Gazette 1 week ago
frick you guys.......... dogs are endangered species........ animals are more important getting hurt
will88chang 1 week ago
incredible, i can´t believe it, what a crash
RAFF72GI 1 week ago
how the get this dog on the reace track????Fucking animals I hope theat the rider is ok!!!!!!!
019Srb 2 weeks ago
fuckin sweet jesus...was the rider ok?
gaztrevs 2 weeks ago
wtf is that dog doing on the track ?!
sandokan204 2 weeks ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
這個救護車也來太快了吧!!! 7秒耶!!
有天眼通嗎!
還是其實是搭觔斗雲來的XD
Lucascoud 2 weeks ago
people on you tube why dont u have the balls to say that shit in public rip the dog fucking serious ? that guy is probably dead
MrSpartan92 2 weeks ago 2
It's a track not a public road.
fahadaziz1980 2 weeks ago
i really hope the dog survived, fuck the driver, hes just a bastard trying to kill that poor dog.
ristuksenvittu 3 weeks ago
@ristuksenvittu ye you fucking retard, because i bet the guy was realy aiming at the dog and thinking "im gona hit that bastard at 200 km/h, fuck my bike and probably kill myself, but it will be worth it!!!"
fucking idiot go dig a hole and hide on hit for the rest of your life and save the rest of the world from being in contact with your stupidity
nightsrc 1 day ago
the dog survived.
VertikOkz 3 weeks ago
who let the dogs out?
fricike 3 weeks ago 3
brutal, hope the riders ok
cjyu2 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
0:13 100 times repeated :D
MrBobagaga 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrBobagaga 3 weeks ago
the dog named- Dissolvy :D
MrBobagaga 3 weeks ago
Now they got two dogs xD
asatrv 3 weeks ago 2
think that it was a giraff :)
bmw97charlie 3 weeks ago
poor dog
excess4all 3 weeks ago
shit...
DarkRage9891 3 weeks ago
it looks like a deer to me
orionsyndrome 3 weeks ago
yes people, the dog was unharmed... i promise O_O
LarsAKApotet 4 weeks ago 2
Good job for the second rider. Good handle on a sportbike on mud.
existenz55 4 weeks ago
Dog on street? This is not on public road...
existenz55 4 weeks ago
The dog was dead waaaay before impact. If you use your brain you would've noticed the front rider was inexperienced and didn't maneuver fast enough to get out of the way. The dog already had it's legs up and then the 2nd rider wich was more experienced hit it at about the same speed but was able to maintain his balance.
iTheGeek 1 month ago
That was a deer.
QuanticChaos1000 1 month ago 2
keep pressing 5 hahahahahahahaha
looneyirish007 1 month ago
@looneyirish007 LOL :D
starguard 3 weeks ago
how is it possible to have a dog on the race track :s
Zedorek 1 month ago
stupid animal!
Danje1 1 month ago
I am a doggie
ConorF946 1 month ago
R.I.P Nate Dogg lol
FreestyleluiGi92 1 month ago
silly dog, roads are for people :)
HUGOVANTA 1 month ago 2
Looks more like a deer.
junker87g 1 month ago
A cat wont cross a street or a track even if you are racing. But why did a dog cross the street or track even if you are racing?
noobinsnipe 1 month ago
onc ei hit a god on motorbike - actually it was flying away of me after hit. It was uneasy to hold bike on road - but it was ok.
gluhov 1 month ago
camera man ramped over the dog
AdamNeisler 1 month ago
@AdamNeisler Yeah.but he didnt fall.thats skill man !!!!!
kusalwij 1 month ago
lucky you maaannnn pffffewfffff q: S
spotajap 1 month ago
dog meat
LOPEZdJUNGLIST 1 month ago
Woofy!!! Nooooooooooo!!!
MynameisElliott 1 month ago
Miley cyrus brought me here
piddledude 1 month ago
and they say that the dogs are our friends.....yesterday i just hit one with my car....cost me 150$ to repair the car....
mihaicomiati 1 month ago 2
a hope the dog died !! ffs
hellomotofive5 1 month ago
the dog died :(
kanekul 1 month ago 6
@kanekul no shit sherlock
TheBennyynneB 1 month ago
road kill
lllHanzolll 1 month ago
Fucken dog! Why there was a fringing dog there?! It's a track, holy shit! Not a zoo! xD
TheWakan100 1 month ago
@TheWakan100 You think dogs give a fuck about your track? Go close the circuit to your track if its a track.
Powermover001 1 month ago
@Powermover001 If there's a race, there are people supposed to care about the security. So this dog isn't supposed to be here. And why are you pissing me off? Are you a member of that dog's family? Nope I guess, so leave me alone.
TheWakan100 1 month ago
"i hope the dog was ok" are you fucking kidding me?
RomanianUser 2 months ago 95
good job keeping up the bike on the grass!
BlackBearX3 2 months ago 6
more like rip dog
EanKutzi 2 months ago 25
Wicked save on the camera bikes part, hope everyone was okay.
TKO52286 2 months ago 3
I hope the biker was okay :(
JJamiah 2 months ago
is tha dig okay ?
juba776 2 months ago
@juba776 yah i heard they superglued all 270 pieces of it back together and sent it on its way
McGillicutty88 2 months ago
Also, very knoble sliddin skills, good tuck and roll haha
stewiewantsbrianshog 2 months ago
Pretty sure that was a fawn(deer) idk though. I bet the gieco squirrels are somehow connected to this.
stewiewantsbrianshog 2 months ago
You or whoever the byker was could really hold it on the grass. It's almost impossible to do that, even more so to break.
cipmars 2 months ago
looked like a deer too me !!
177jnewton 2 months ago
Pooooor dooooooog! :'[
Paco090810 2 months ago 2
why was their a dog on the race track
ohioacademycreeks 2 months ago
Dude i think he ripped the dogs leg off!
0:13
ilovemodz360 2 months ago
It's been confirmed. The dog lived, the biker died.
Fail: biker
Win: dog
HayabusaXGHOSTX 3 months ago
WTF happend to that DOG? D:
jollez0r 3 months ago
that ain't no street, that's a race track
ttvdesign 3 months ago
euuugh bet he was cleaning up his bike, shredded the dog!
oj07731 3 months ago
rip rudolph I guess this it for this years christmas :(
momsbabyboy 3 months ago
@momsbabyboy it was a dog oO
HAUDEGENRUHRPOTT 3 months ago
@HAUDEGENRUHRPOTT alter guck doch ma richtig hin!!! es ist ein reeh (ich weiß rudolph ist eigentlich ein rentier) guck dir mal den fell an!!! und wer lässt seinen köter den auf einer rennstrecke frei rumlaufen???
momsbabyboy 3 months ago
@momsbabyboy In Indien sind auch Hunde auf der Strecke oO Die sind auch Heerchenlos. Und in der Ukraine auch...heisst ja nicht das der wem gehören muss....
HAUDEGENRUHRPOTT 3 months ago
I dont know whether to like or dislike...sucks for the dog but I feel more for the racers, dumb dogs shouldnt run out in front of vehicles, deer freeze, I swear squirrels and rabbits are suicidal, hope crasher is alright.
startthefire6 3 months ago
Dude thats a deer not a dog, pause it at the crash
mortimash 3 months ago
@mortimash Your right !
ian8354 3 months ago
nobody pushed him to race.
GadgetVision 3 months ago
retarded dog
logicCplusplus 3 months ago
That guy who died is a asshole for hitting the dog.
wolf44442 3 months ago
@wolf44442 hey dumbass, u thinks it easy to slam on the brakes or avoid a dog goins close to 100mph? cause its not, theres nothing he could do
ACDCROCKS9601 3 months ago
Im going to go out on a limb and say the dog didn't make it.
nibbler125 3 months ago
Two same objects hits frontal
40mph 40mph its 40mph crash (the speeds don't double)
like 40mph to the wall
Your thinking seems to be logic for most people but are against phisics law and are not true.. I let You lin to double check in the web because I am 100% sure that I have right. All.
ADULTFLASHGAMES 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES "In frontal collisions, the sum of both
vehicles' speeds become the velocity at which damage is produced"
Google for it, its basic physics.
What will hit someone harder: a train, that is standing still and person running into it at 10km/h, or a train running at 250km/h and a person running into it at 10km/h?
For more detailed explanation, google for "Q: Crashing cars - any difference?" please.
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545
Here you get from the link You gave me
Q: Crashing cars - any difference?
Answer(1 google link):
"So yes, the total energy of hitting a wall head on is exactly the
total energy of hitting a oncoming car traveling at the same speed."
It look like you want so much to have right that your parception changes the meaning of the words you read in your mind.. so its bigger problem ..
I can't explain it more ...
ADULTFLASHGAMES 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Total energy for single car. Don't cherry pick, read to the end. Or rethink my sample with train. Approach incoming train running, compared to standing one :) Feel the energy :)
lin545 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES
I mean, according to your view angle, bullets won't penetrate you, because you just stand there... You should be moving into them, so they have penetration, and this penetration energy will solely depend upon your speed?
Tell it to minigun, my friend :) I won't approach shooting minigun pointblank if I were you. Only those standing still :)
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545 OK so what if I gave you now link from youtube with total explanation and crashtests with view of cars hit wall then face-on show that I am comletly right ...are you send me apology every day for the next year then ??? .... We are talking about two same objects and you talk to me about the bullet and human ...this comperison told me that you don't know what are we talking about
ADULTFLASHGAMES 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Go ahead, send it. Im not going to "send you apology every day for the next year", because I never requested such apology from yourself either. If you (and video) are correct and logically proven, I will send you "thank you" as in every normal human conversation.
Im not a prostitute or slave, so, sorry.
"We are talking about two same objects and you talk to me about the bullet and human"
To my knowledge,nature makes no exceptions, be it cars, bullets, or bill gates.
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545 haha OK
watch?v=r8E5dUnLmh4 nice watching ^^
ADULTFLASHGAMES 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Hey man, THANKS for the link. That was definately a brain braker for the past 24 hours, but I think I finally understood. The funny moment was that car was damaged MORE by wall, than by equial car itself if you watch closely.
There is energy(E) at moment of crash, E = car mass x speed.
This energy * material density = resistance.
now, mechanics :)
lin545 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES mech-s:
At point of contact, the whole energy is thrown at target.
1) Because stone wall has near ultimate resistance(as its grounded, hard, massive, thick, heavy) - near 100% of own energy is thrown back at car.
2) In case of similar car at similar speed(energy), E1 + E2 = 200%, but this 200% are distributed along two cars. The resistance of car is additionally way less than that of wall, cars mass yields to crash energy(E) giving ammortizing effect. more:
lin545 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES
The internal damage to car material is part of energy(E) that was not absorbed by ammortization(car flying back) - because of protective cage - more damage is ammortized back.
Amazing thing. I need your thoughts too.
Things what I want Mythbusters to do now:
1) Do same test, same cars, same speed, but take approaching car have two times the weight (just weight).
2) Crash car into the standing tree.
3) Crash car in wall(backuped by ~50 tons mass) moving at same speed.
FUN.
lin545 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES
Oh, forgot to add, the (E1 + E2)=Res1/Res2 thing at crash is dynamic, meaning if one of the objects is:
faster,
harder (sturdier),
heavier,
less ergonomic back(ie truck),
has heavyduty wheels
the energy *should be* be distributed more to a "weaker" target.
Meaning frontal head-on crash of lighter car into much heavier vehicle can become even more damaging than sum of their speeds. Speed turned out to be only a small factor of many.
lin545 3 months ago
nice braking!
r3kin 3 months ago
@Looorney I'm sure that whatever is left of the dog is very NOT okay.
TranceFur 3 months ago
Is the dog ok?
Looorney 3 months ago
it was a deer not dog
markj15062 3 months ago
oh shit! what happened to the rider??
kornkluivert 3 months ago
Sell it to some Chinese fellow. XD
ClubCrew 3 months ago
thumbs up if you tilt your head when he turns
danniedundas 3 months ago 53
poor dog
baloiicebox 3 months ago
0:12 thats not dog, thats a bitch
MrBarto96 3 months ago
if you ride a motorbike prepare to die or be a quadriplegic...simple, we all know the risk.
gloomysuicidal 3 months ago 2
@gloomysuicidal has nothing to do with bikes.
1/6 of all crashes had bikes involved, yes, yet: in 8/10 of those cases the car driver was responsible.
Also, all car protections are designed for 60 km/h, which means frontal collision of two vehicles going >30 km/h max <.
At 80kmh frontal collision means 160kmh - big meat/metal sandwitch.
Bike protection is designed for ~40km/h max.
If you drive, prepare for death or incident due to bad fortune, ignorants or egoists. Thats reality.
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545 absolutely true. cyclists also pay much more attention to traffic and the street, because they need to. it's usually bad car drivers causing the accidents.
ez45 3 months ago
@lin545 IF You make frontal collision by 60 is still 60 .You don't make 60+60=120. its still 60. (Check physics or some forums around web if You don't believe me.)
ADULTFLASHGAMES 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES Frontal collision with approaching vehicle results in sum of speeds. Thats why example people get penetrated by bullets; or why it is possible to catch a bird flying in same direction.
Current euroncap tests are performed at 64km/h - this would mean either frontal collision with approaching vehicle at 32km/h both, or direct frontal collision with static object at 64km/h.
lin545 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES cont.
Means if you and appoaching driver both maintain correct speed (50km/h in city, 70 km/h outside, 120+ on autobahn - in europe) the effective collision speed will be 100, 140 and 240 km/h correspodently.
As with each additional 10km/h the energy behind is doubled, frontal collision at 100km/h in city would mean 64 times greater impact strength than designed by protective cage.
The only hope for driver is collision with obstacle, not approaching vehicle.
lin545 3 months ago
@ADULTFLASHGAMES cont 2.
Because collisions with pedestrians are tested at 40km/h (and minimal speed in city, in europe, is 50km/h), the only way where this test is valid - is that driver already engaged brakes and deaccelerated to 40km/h.
Side or back collisions are tested at much lower speed - there is way less hope.
The whole ncap tests are unrealistic in 80% of cases and they already (!) are aware about it.
Maybe they will redesign tests soon, I heard minimum 100 km/h was suggested.
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545 your facts and theories are so distorted and twisted (e.g. 60km/h, 30km/h...that is some serious bad physics) that it becomes incomprehensible to any logical reasoning. The REAL fact is that you are much much more likely to be SERIOUSLY or FATALLY hurt if you ride a motorcycle in comparison to when you drive a car. To illustrate, my own mother totaled her car (70km/h plus head on collision) 3 times and she got off with no injury whatsoever in all cases.
gloomysuicidal 3 months ago
@gloomysuicidal My facts are direct and correct. Your subjective perception may vary. Speeds do sum up, energy does sum up, Einstein welcomes you.
The real fact, is that I didn't claim riding a bike is less dangerous than riding a bike. On the contrary, you claimed that riding a bike almost certainly will kill you. This is BS. Car and bike are different beasts - in weight/energy, in protection, in acceleration, in manuerability, in perception field, in driving style. contd:..
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545 "The real fact, is that I didn't claim riding a bike is less dangerous than riding a bike." ---> "...I didn't claim riding a bike is more secure than driving in a car".
lin545 3 months ago
@gloomysuicidal cont.
Drivers are different too. Stuff can break. Crap can happen. People always call for security - (almost) perfect security can only happen if everything is discrete, integrated and harmonic. This is wrong world for that kind of fairy tale - I guess because this is path to ultimate dullness and souls need "fresh air". This world is not designed for ultimate security/golden cage of decadency. This why a lot of people start riding a bike instead of cars. contd2..:
lin545 3 months ago
@gloomysuicidal cont 2.
A car driver is more likely to get into accident at 70km/h than biker(due to manuerability).
A biker is much more likely to get injured.
A biker is more often confronted with chances for accidents due to more cars on road.
You cannot drive car same as you ride bike - car drivers often do not expect bikers appearing out of nowhere.
Biker has near zero chance to survive frontal head-on coll., they often die due to cars from opposite row trying to outstrip and jump out sdnly
lin545 3 months ago
@lin545 my cousin an avid motorcycle rider who rides a cbr1000rr almost every other day broke one of his legs, one of his ribs, fractures and suffered moderate concussion when his bike accidentally hit a tiny puddle on a highway and one of his tires lost traction. He has been riding for 20 years so he is very experienced and still he got injured from just a tiny puddle. If you still thinks that riding a motorcycle is not much much much more dangerous than driving a car then that is up to you.
gloomysuicidal 3 months ago
@gloomysuicidal I saw people die in car accidents at 70km/h, I saw cars becoming meat sandwiches at highways, I saw people survive, because they were NOT strapped and have flied out of the frontal window.
But a car driver in a car that passed 5 ncap, --in case of unavoidable crash--, at speeds less than 65 km/h total, in case nothing else sums up, is very likely to outcome alive than --any-- bike. Bikes are like flies,..Given same total amount,do "flies" die more often than more "robust mice"?
lin545 3 months ago
RIP headphone users
uscgswimmer1 3 months ago 43
@uscgswimmer1 im still alive
hopefullyApro 3 months ago
hmm guess the dog is cut in half now...
Karthalas3th 3 months ago
Was there something in the road?
trpaetkau77 4 months ago
@trpaetkau77 doesn't the title give it away or do you need another clue?
well since im so nice ill help you out......try reading the description?
have you got it yet.......im running out of clues?.........erm......
why not try the top comment..............co'mon now this is your last chance to win the speedboat
mozer30 4 months ago
era un venado!me costo congelarlo,pero esta en alguna parte del 0:13
mrmarclaro 4 months ago
WTF!!
MaxCheatersMember 4 months ago
I would fall down too
theblaad 4 months ago
hold space for slo mo
MrJefsey 4 months ago
Push 6
iColoriZze 4 months ago
its ok guys the dog survived.. im just joking haha its dead...
VIRALinflux 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that looks like a deer
B0N0FAN 4 months ago
that looks like a dear
B0N0FAN 4 months ago
lol puppies are evil
Gre3nPp0w3r 4 months ago
A white-tailed deer can jump obstructions (fences) over 12 feet high.
True story.
Jafromobile 4 months ago
if this was in korea they would be rushing over a-SAP, just for the fresh meat
19may0001 4 months ago 2
@19may0001 Don't you mean Alabama?
Jafromobile 4 months ago
@Jafromobile dogs are eating there too?
19may0001 4 months ago
@19may0001 It was a deer. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Jafromobile 4 months ago
A 0:13 double tapp.
Dannydanthepizzaman 4 months ago
NICE RURAL SPEED TRACK, FAST AND CURVY... IT WASN'T A DOG THO, IT WAS A BABY DEER THE FRONT RIDER HIT, FREEZE FRAME IT.
OUT OF ALL THE DOGS I'VE EVER SEEN, I'VE NEVER SEEN ONE WITH HOOVES!
BESIDES, WHAT DOG ROAMS FREE ON A BIKER TRACK, I SEE DEER ALL THE TIME AT THE MEADOWS SPEED RUN TRACK, THEY JUMP THE FENCE GIRDERS AND GET HIT LIKE THIS OFTEN, DEER ON TRACKS IS A REAL PROBLEM ON RURAL TRACKS.
oops, caps lock was on, my bad..
junkification 4 months ago
Comment removed
junkification 4 months ago
Even on the track you take the chance of hitting an animal. A deer will mess you up.
Shep6531 4 months ago
stupid bitch
juice0935 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah, well, do anybody realize that if they both had rode on the CORRECT side of the road, this video wouldnt even be here?
Serckep 4 months ago
@Serckep it´s a race track
sum41billytalent 4 months ago 15
@Serckep wtf? its a race track and thats the picked line of attack
dc110574 4 months ago
@Serckep my god its an ACTUAL race track...cant u tell just by looking at the sides of the track?? idiot
diresolo 4 months ago
That was a deer..
DatWunKrazieAzn 4 months ago
@DatWunKrazieAzn Yes it was. And yes it was a circuit. Horrific crash, good he got away with it.
Sandberg1972 4 months ago
How did a Deer turn into a DOG? That was a DEER that ran in front of the rider at Summit Point Main last year.
Jaymz996 4 months ago
Dog Circuit!!
hibabalula 4 months ago
RIP dog....
Adasi 4 months ago
If your learning how to drive a racemotor with professionals they learn you to NEVER swerve for an obsticle including a dog, they learn you to drive over a autoband at 60 km/h, its really hard but still you have to be able to do it.
bernardbulte 4 months ago
Looks like the guy in front should be fine, good save by the guy in back....fucking pooches O.o
MrSlowestD16 4 months ago
Nice reaction motocykle 2
DarksFoxy 4 months ago
dam things the size of a horse
a92123 4 months ago
I say poor dog before poor human. Just because humans in general are the most selfish and asshole animals on the face of the earth. Dogs on the other hand show more love than any other creature I've seen yet. You don't see a husband kissing her wife like crazy every time she walks in from work or whatever. Its just more sad to me. BUT as humans its important to take care of our species before others but dogs are just so loving... You understand if you have a dog. :(
iH8MomJokes 4 months ago
@iH8MomJokes Hippy
BrayDaze 4 months ago
@iH8MomJokes poor dogs bite children in the face if they have a chance..
bernardbulte 4 months ago
@iH8MomJokes hmm..cry me a river..its the law of life..the strong survive..the weak DIE :D
acidroshan1 4 months ago
yo that dog got it!!1
lenford10 4 months ago
Poor dog or deer.. Hope the rider ok
bearnkucing 4 months ago
Poor Dog Poor Bike :'(
era2817 5 months ago 2
Deer!!!
jeepcj7dude 5 months ago
damn...... :( i hope the bike is ok
nayrsacul 5 months ago