Building Collapse in Center of Rio De Janeiro

[wla7777]

are buildings insured? - yes - here is an answer why..

[TheMrAlexrj]

haarp

[yourtreat2]

It's just God's little way of saying he out there and that he really gives a shit about you morons that believe in supernatural explanations of the world.

He's saying: "Have a nice day.".

[Danandrea737]

First the noise... now building collapsing... than what? :S Maybe HAARP is REALLY the answer...

[PatrickAParish]

"reports of explosions and the smell of natural gas", "it's a commercial building". I'm suspecting that a good look through the financials might tell an interesting tale for this story.... or not. Who knows?

[marcelcarroll]

I see a big deal is being made of the collapse of these buildings. After all, this is newsworthy stuff. Makes me wonder, though, why at least as much attention was not paid back in 2001 to the collapse on 9/11 of the third building, known as WTC7. It was 47 stories tall, steel framed, was not hit be any airplane, was on the same block in NYC as the Twin Towers, and fell into its footprint nice and neatly in under 10 seconds. Why? Just Google WTC7.

[SharkDude1]

@marcelcarroll Get a Life already..shezzz You crazy 911 conspiracy nutjobs just won't go away.

[marcelcarroll]

@SharkDude1 I'm certainly not a conspiracy theorist. Far from it. I just don't understand why WTC7 collapsed. Makes no sense.  There has been no reasonable explanation provided. More than anything, though, I don't understand why the collapse was not covered by the press. If a 47 story steel building collapsed in my home town, it would be a very big deal. Instead of accusing me of being a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not (I have no theory!), just explain what happened.

[TheFlyposter]

@marcelcarroll

Specifically what in the NIST report on the collapse of building 7 that took years to complete do you disagree with?

[marcelcarroll]

@TheFlyposter NIST barely mentions Building 7. They certainly do not establish a firm conclusion. It is the absence of press reporting, explanations by NIST or anyone else, as well as the unbelievable nature of the incident as anything other than controlled demolition that I seek explanations about. If you ever view the building's collapse (YouTube) you will understand.  Buildings don't just collapse. Steel building frames also don't burn down or vibrate down.

[TheFlyposter]

@marcelcarroll Wrong and wrong, there have been many steel framed buildings that have collapsed due to fire, and NIST have released a report of there investigation into building 7. Read that and tell me what you disagree with.

Check your inbox for info about the report.

[TheFlyposter]

@TheFlyposter ok, can't message you, your channel is unavailable. Google NIST report.

[marcelcarroll]

@SharkDude1 Dude, I have no theory. The government apparently has a conspiracy theory about WTC7, but won't tell anyone what it is. They have their conspiracy theory about the Twin Towers, which I have little interest in, but Building 7 is a real mystery. The absence by the media of any coverage from 9/12 until today is the biggest mystery.

[chernobylFarms]

Rio, isn't that like Tel Aviv or like Columbia, Maryland, "new" cities quickly plotted and planted in the wilderness?

[allexcosta]

@chernobylFarms: No, it's not. That's a fairly old neighborhood. Maintenance is not great, though.