"... and the so called Kutub Minar (Kutub Tower in Delhi), a pillar commemorating that victory and the consequential marriage with the Vaihika (Balkh) princess as testified by the nearby iron pillar inscription..." I got this from Kaaba a Hindu Temple - please specify which account is correct - Rene
In the name of the Holy festival, Indians have burnt most of their history & Old scriptures. That is why they have to look to whatever else has been written about india by Foreigners. So, anybody can claim to have built anything. In the name of Peace for the flag colours they have picked for the 3 religions, now India has to keep mum about all these and prevent the people from trying to create racial riots with "Take-back-what-was-mine" mentality.
U must be a Hindu who knows about your own religion & Historical roots, If you have been to this place, you will know that it was a Hindu Temple Once. The face of the elephant God- Ganesh is on almost all the pillars, has been Chipped Off. Another Ganesh stone carved piece is placed on the ground to be Looked Down upon as you enter this place. The govt actually put metal bars around it now.
Think of Haja Sofia in Turkey & its not difficult to Imagine what was done to this Once Hindu Temple.
dear communal indians youtube is being watched by the whole world kindly do not show your ignorance and illeterate behaviour about medeviel history by uploading useless and irrational comments against medeviel muslim culture which in so many ways have given fame to india in the whole world..rather try to appriciate it..
@tmkh2000 You do realize that basically everything in the Qutb complex is built over the ruins of an earlier Hindu complex which was razed to the ground by the Muslim victors, right? The stones used in the Qutb Minar, and especially in the Quwwat-al Islam mosque are from the earlier Jain and Hindu temples built there. One can be understandably peeved.
* this minaret was built by the gorids ! The Ghurids or Ghorids (Persian: سلسله غوریان; self-designation: Shansabānī) were a medieval Muslim dynasty of Iranian origin that ruled during the 12th and 13th centuries in Khorasan.[1] At its zenith, their empire, that was centered in Ghōr (now a province in Afghanistan), stretched over an area that included the whole of modern Afghanistan, the EASTERN parts of Iran and the northern section of the Indian subcontinent, as far as Delhi.
The twisted history that Qutubuddin Aibak was the author of Qutub minar is just like I was the author of Eiffel Tower :). Look at the Hindu architecture and work out your brains, why would a blood thirsty of Hindus race inculcate Hindu architecture into an "Islamic" monument? He will not. Nor did he. Because Qutubuddin Aibak never built Qutub Minar as the Islamic written fake history about these monuments claim. Its time people knew and believed in the truth than lies.
hindus are very hypocrites.one of hindu zionist histoiran lal was complaining that muslims killed 800 million hindus,and yet they show proudly islamic architechture whether it is taj mahal or qutb minar or red fort and etc.they are only good at speaking better english with thier docile accent and having descendents of kamasutrans
@kandahar0, not really. Hindus are also good at finding out the truth about their own glorious past that was desecrated by invading Islamists. Neither Taj Mahal nor Qutub Minar was ever an Islamic structure. These gullible tales were fabricated by the perverted Shahjahan and his likes. Taj Mahal was Tejo Mahal - a glorious Hindu temple. So was Qutub Minar another Hindu structure.
THAT PEICE OF SHIT (DELHI METRO) IS SIMPLY GARBAGE .... LOL..
FEW DAYS BACK THE DELHI BRIDGE COLLAPSED , AS THE FATBRAIN DELHI PPL HAVE VERY LOW INTELLIGENCE IN THEIR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING, UPARSE IN DELHI KE BHIKARIO KE PAAS PAISA BHI NAHI TO CREATE A STRONG BRIDGE . THAT SHITTY DELHI IS FULL OF BEGGARS AND FATICHARS haha
ALL NORTH INDIAN CITIES DELHI , CHANDIGARH ETC. ARE FLOODED WITH UNCIVILISED & ILLTERATE FATBRAIN APES.
THESE MUTHERFUCKER DELHI CHIMPANZEES DANCE IN MARRIAGE CEREMONIES & ON ROADS AS IF SUM1 SHOVED CACTUS UP IN THEIR ASS . HAHAHAHA OR AS IF THEIR RANDI MOMS GAVE BIRTH TO A 100TH CHILD. HAHAHAHAHA
THEY ARE SO HILARIOUS AND ABNORMAL ...
COZ DECENT CIVILISED PPL DONT DANCE ON ROADS OR PUBLIC PLACES .DELHI WALO KI MAA RANDIYAN HOTI HAI . TAJMAHAL QUTUBMINAR
India does not hate muslims! India is complete only with all the people in it! I'm not a Christian, neither a Muslim, nor a Hindu.. I'm just an Indian!
@rengaraj0tube Hindu ... actually means hindu....i mean.. the name hindu came to those people who lived around sindhu (indus)....ie present day India and pakistan.... we made it as religion........ in india.. we always have been practising diff religion... we have been secular from the historic times. our religion has never teached us to hate other religion. ... Proud to be Indian... and want to be a gud Human
@gauravzerogravity, why don't you demolish the taj mahal, you silly hindu statue worshiping bastard, indias revenue comes from muslim architecture you ungrateful bastard. You just keep worshiping statues you silly low caste indian fucker, hinduism is full of shit, caste system, hindus are the most racists on earth, you don't like dark skin, you call them low caste you racist fuckers
After big research(GHURI) was afghan from(ghurian)soor tribe. and delhi sultanat was afghan based system, but had 2 turkik dynesties too, while 3 others were afghans,
27 previous Hindu and Jain temples were destroyed and their materials reused to construct this Qutub Minar (John Keay's "History of India," ) Muslims should be punished for this evil deed. Who gave them the right to break Hindu temples?
This the architectire of Khurasan - today called Afghanistan-Iran. The Ghurid Tajik amirs built such minars all over their relm. This particular splendid minar was built by the slave general of called Qutbuddin - whom was the favourite slave of Muhamad Ghuri, whom was a Tajik (Persian). Qutbuddin was of Turkish descent - as were most slaves in Khurasan - but he was not a Turk in the modern sense - he was Persian in speech and culture.
TURKS were always slaves. It is only since Ataturk that they revised their history in Asia. Tajik is the Chino-Turkic word for Persian. So Tajik and Persian are the same thing. The Azeri-Shiasm rule in Persia took hold after the period of Ghorids. Safawids were the main proponents of that. The Pashtuns were not muslim at the time of the Ghorids. They were still Hindu like their Rajput cousins.
firs u r wrong tajiks are descendies of bactria like pashtuns were persians are from persia(near persian gulf) and no persians had only 2 empires and both were before islam for limited times. and rest of that u hve been ruled by turks as well as tajik-o-pashtuns.khwarisem seljuks,safavid,afsharids were all turks got it and no pashtuns were muslim since arab invasions read more and no one is gonna buy iranian history.
Hundreds of Buddhist statues, stupas and viharas have been destroyed in India between 830 and 966 AD in the name of Hindu revivalism. Both literary and archaeological sources within and outside India speak volumes about the havoc done to Buddhism by Hindu fanatics. Spiritual leaders like Sankaracharya and many Hindu kings and rulers took pride in demolishing Buddhist images aiming at the total eradication of Buddhist culture.
Which is more likely? The Minaret of Jam was built by a Tajik or an Afghan? Who cares, central asia is the most intriguing part of the world. You just don't get that vastness anywhere else.
qutub architecture does not look islamic, but rather Indian or specifically Hindu. No where in the Islamic world there is any architecture that looks like this.
yeah this was liberal vission of Afghan Salateen, includin Fareedudidn shershah. they did not interfered local culture but later Mughuls inforced their language and culture
You don't know what Hindu looks like you videshi, wtf are you talking about. This is Indian Islamic structure, it differs from Persian or Arabic Islamic construction. Pathans (Afghan) were extremely tolerant and well respected rulers in India that never tried to subjugate the people and their culture wasn't much different from the rest of Hindustans. Mughals who were Persianized introduced Persian architecture.
@Ghaffar1947 R u joking ?? "Afghans" and "tolerance" ?!?!? where in the world were you when the afghans were breaking the world's largest BUDDHAS at BAMIYAN ??? Tolerance....my foot. there are no joint ventures between the oppressors and the oppressed. old structures were broken to make way for the new. and all those who gave high ratings to this guy are stupid idiots.
"... and the so called Kutub Minar (Kutub Tower in Delhi), a pillar commemorating that victory and the consequential marriage with the Vaihika (Balkh) princess as testified by the nearby iron pillar inscription..." I got this from Kaaba a Hindu Temple - please specify which account is correct - Rene
mammyoriordan 1 month ago
In the name of the Holy festival, Indians have burnt most of their history & Old scriptures. That is why they have to look to whatever else has been written about india by Foreigners. So, anybody can claim to have built anything. In the name of Peace for the flag colours they have picked for the 3 religions, now India has to keep mum about all these and prevent the people from trying to create racial riots with "Take-back-what-was-mine" mentality.
Like they did in Ayodhya. I'll leave it to God.
BettyBSimpson 3 months ago
U must be a Hindu who knows about your own religion & Historical roots, If you have been to this place, you will know that it was a Hindu Temple Once. The face of the elephant God- Ganesh is on almost all the pillars, has been Chipped Off. Another Ganesh stone carved piece is placed on the ground to be Looked Down upon as you enter this place. The govt actually put metal bars around it now.
Think of Haja Sofia in Turkey & its not difficult to Imagine what was done to this Once Hindu Temple.
BettyBSimpson 3 months ago
wow India!
adelle0001 3 months ago
dear communal indians youtube is being watched by the whole world kindly do not show your ignorance and illeterate behaviour about medeviel history by uploading useless and irrational comments against medeviel muslim culture which in so many ways have given fame to india in the whole world..rather try to appriciate it..
tmkh2000 5 months ago
@tmkh2000 You do realize that basically everything in the Qutb complex is built over the ruins of an earlier Hindu complex which was razed to the ground by the Muslim victors, right? The stones used in the Qutb Minar, and especially in the Quwwat-al Islam mosque are from the earlier Jain and Hindu temples built there. One can be understandably peeved.
Dzongka 3 days ago
* this minaret was built by the gorids ! The Ghurids or Ghorids (Persian: سلسله غوریان; self-designation: Shansabānī) were a medieval Muslim dynasty of Iranian origin that ruled during the 12th and 13th centuries in Khorasan.[1] At its zenith, their empire, that was centered in Ghōr (now a province in Afghanistan), stretched over an area that included the whole of modern Afghanistan, the EASTERN parts of Iran and the northern section of the Indian subcontinent, as far as Delhi.
TheAFGpersiangirlAFG 7 months ago
i love india, its so ancient wow
TheAFGpersiangirlAFG 7 months ago
Magnificent Muslim Architecture!
GudMuzlim786 8 months ago
ITNA LAMBA ITNA CHOUDA YE HAI DHARTI KA LOUDA
anshu5256 1 year ago
The twisted history that Qutubuddin Aibak was the author of Qutub minar is just like I was the author of Eiffel Tower :). Look at the Hindu architecture and work out your brains, why would a blood thirsty of Hindus race inculcate Hindu architecture into an "Islamic" monument? He will not. Nor did he. Because Qutubuddin Aibak never built Qutub Minar as the Islamic written fake history about these monuments claim. Its time people knew and believed in the truth than lies.
Chhenu 1 year ago 2
hindus are very hypocrites.one of hindu zionist histoiran lal was complaining that muslims killed 800 million hindus,and yet they show proudly islamic architechture whether it is taj mahal or qutb minar or red fort and etc.they are only good at speaking better english with thier docile accent and having descendents of kamasutrans
kandahar0 1 year ago
@kandahar0
LOL
SirianKings 1 year ago
@kandahar0, not really. Hindus are also good at finding out the truth about their own glorious past that was desecrated by invading Islamists. Neither Taj Mahal nor Qutub Minar was ever an Islamic structure. These gullible tales were fabricated by the perverted Shahjahan and his likes. Taj Mahal was Tejo Mahal - a glorious Hindu temple. So was Qutub Minar another Hindu structure.
Chhenu 1 year ago
This is the only Shiva Linga in India and the British stole it and gave Qutub Minar the name to create problems between Hindus and jains.
badaustad 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THAT PEICE OF SHIT (DELHI METRO) IS SIMPLY GARBAGE .... LOL..
FEW DAYS BACK THE DELHI BRIDGE COLLAPSED , AS THE FATBRAIN DELHI PPL HAVE VERY LOW INTELLIGENCE IN THEIR CONSTRUCTION PLANNING, UPARSE IN DELHI KE BHIKARIO KE PAAS PAISA BHI NAHI TO CREATE A STRONG BRIDGE . THAT SHITTY DELHI IS FULL OF BEGGARS AND FATICHARS haha
KerelasBlackSweeper 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL NORTH INDIAN CITIES DELHI , CHANDIGARH ETC. ARE FLOODED WITH UNCIVILISED & ILLTERATE FATBRAIN APES.
THESE MUTHERFUCKER DELHI CHIMPANZEES DANCE IN MARRIAGE CEREMONIES & ON ROADS AS IF SUM1 SHOVED CACTUS UP IN THEIR ASS . HAHAHAHA OR AS IF THEIR RANDI MOMS GAVE BIRTH TO A 100TH CHILD. HAHAHAHAHA
THEY ARE SO HILARIOUS AND ABNORMAL ...
COZ DECENT CIVILISED PPL DONT DANCE ON ROADS OR PUBLIC PLACES .DELHI WALO KI MAA RANDIYAN HOTI HAI . TAJMAHAL QUTUBMINAR
ME 5PAISE ME CHUDWATI HAI haha
KerelasBlackSweeper 1 year ago
India does not hate muslims! India is complete only with all the people in it! I'm not a Christian, neither a Muslim, nor a Hindu.. I'm just an Indian!
rengaraj0tube 1 year ago 5
@rengaraj0tube Hindu ... actually means hindu....i mean.. the name hindu came to those people who lived around sindhu (indus)....ie present day India and pakistan.... we made it as religion........ in india.. we always have been practising diff religion... we have been secular from the historic times. our religion has never teached us to hate other religion. ... Proud to be Indian... and want to be a gud Human
sbajaythakur 9 months ago 2
we should demolish all these fucking towers they abused our religion now its our time to do something
gauravzerogravity 2 years ago
@gauravzerogravity, why don't you demolish the taj mahal, you silly hindu statue worshiping bastard, indias revenue comes from muslim architecture you ungrateful bastard. You just keep worshiping statues you silly low caste indian fucker, hinduism is full of shit, caste system, hindus are the most racists on earth, you don't like dark skin, you call them low caste you racist fuckers
conservative75 2 years ago
Hey read up on the crusades, it will make you feel like a complete idiot.
ktspaz 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing - I have added this to our playlist 'Things to do in Delhi' :-)
MahindraHomestays 3 years ago
Yes, I must visit that petrol station next trip to Delhi!
kneejerker 3 years ago
After big research(GHURI) was afghan from(ghurian)soor tribe. and delhi sultanat was afghan based system, but had 2 turkik dynesties too, while 3 others were afghans,
AFGHAN POWERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
infiltratorr 3 years ago
27 previous Hindu and Jain temples were destroyed and their materials reused to construct this Qutub Minar (John Keay's "History of India," ) Muslims should be punished for this evil deed. Who gave them the right to break Hindu temples?
skrooyoohoo 3 years ago
@skrooyoohoo well said dude.
atheistindian 1 year ago
This the architectire of Khurasan - today called Afghanistan-Iran. The Ghurid Tajik amirs built such minars all over their relm. This particular splendid minar was built by the slave general of called Qutbuddin - whom was the favourite slave of Muhamad Ghuri, whom was a Tajik (Persian). Qutbuddin was of Turkish descent - as were most slaves in Khurasan - but he was not a Turk in the modern sense - he was Persian in speech and culture.
Ghurshah 3 years ago
not perian but TAJIK . they are different when takij-o-pashtuns were ruling india persians them selvs were slaves to turks and azeris:)
infiltratorr 3 years ago
TURKS were always slaves. It is only since Ataturk that they revised their history in Asia. Tajik is the Chino-Turkic word for Persian. So Tajik and Persian are the same thing. The Azeri-Shiasm rule in Persia took hold after the period of Ghorids. Safawids were the main proponents of that. The Pashtuns were not muslim at the time of the Ghorids. They were still Hindu like their Rajput cousins.
Ghurshah 3 years ago
firs u r wrong tajiks are descendies of bactria like pashtuns were persians are from persia(near persian gulf) and no persians had only 2 empires and both were before islam for limited times. and rest of that u hve been ruled by turks as well as tajik-o-pashtuns.khwarisem seljuks,safavid,afsharids were all turks got it and no pashtuns were muslim since arab invasions read more and no one is gonna buy iranian history.
infiltratorr 3 years ago
Hundreds of Buddhist statues, stupas and viharas have been destroyed in India between 830 and 966 AD in the name of Hindu revivalism. Both literary and archaeological sources within and outside India speak volumes about the havoc done to Buddhism by Hindu fanatics. Spiritual leaders like Sankaracharya and many Hindu kings and rulers took pride in demolishing Buddhist images aiming at the total eradication of Buddhist culture.
ummah19 3 years ago
Muslims should be punished for this evil deed. Who gave them the right to break Hindu temples?
skrooyoohoo 3 years ago
I agree, we gave them a good lesson on bawari.
deepakjindal070 2 years ago 4
@skrooyoohoo, you should demolish the taj mahal, made by a muslim mughal, your tourism relies on it, you silly cunt
conservative75 2 years ago
Please be careful!This masterpiece is not arabic, tajic, indian or further! İt is turkish! Yes you can ve sure,absolutely Turkish like Taj Mahal.
drbilen 3 years ago
beautiful
fraskarika 4 years ago
how to play this video
sgttilak 4 years ago
Which is more likely? The Minaret of Jam was built by a Tajik or an Afghan? Who cares, central asia is the most intriguing part of the world. You just don't get that vastness anywhere else.
brazendisplays 4 years ago
u r right! tajik and pashtun are from one race and hve always been togheter, like ghorid empire was tajik but many pashtons in it and so on.
infiltratorr 3 years ago
Buen video,
Good Video.
Tkanks.
jclezama 4 years ago
anyway all islamic monuments were buld by GREAT MOGHULS who came from steppes of mongolia and kazakhstan. They were GREAT TURKIC KHANS
talker1975 4 years ago
except for the central masjid dome and pylar structure in the last 10 seconds I would agree.
abdusammie 4 years ago
agreeing with nopember & commening on Smodass .. daaaa!
njguynorth80 5 years ago
qutub architecture does not look islamic, but rather Indian or specifically Hindu. No where in the Islamic world there is any architecture that looks like this.
smodass 5 years ago
yeah this was liberal vission of Afghan Salateen, includin Fareedudidn shershah. they did not interfered local culture but later Mughuls inforced their language and culture
sherafgan 5 years ago
U can see arabic writings in this whole clip (if u know arabic) so this is wrong that that this architecture does not loke like islamic architecture
mstariq 4 years ago
You don't know what Hindu looks like you videshi, wtf are you talking about. This is Indian Islamic structure, it differs from Persian or Arabic Islamic construction. Pathans (Afghan) were extremely tolerant and well respected rulers in India that never tried to subjugate the people and their culture wasn't much different from the rest of Hindustans. Mughals who were Persianized introduced Persian architecture.
Ghaffar1947 4 years ago
@Ghaffar1947 R u joking ?? "Afghans" and "tolerance" ?!?!? where in the world were you when the afghans were breaking the world's largest BUDDHAS at BAMIYAN ??? Tolerance....my foot. there are no joint ventures between the oppressors and the oppressed. old structures were broken to make way for the new. and all those who gave high ratings to this guy are stupid idiots.
atheistindian 1 year ago