Just say for a moment that you are right and human induced Climate Change isn't happening. What is the real harm if we go ahead and invest in renewable energies anyway and it turns out we didn't need to? Who's going to die? Surely this is better than doing nothing and facing the consequences if you are wrong. So my question is this - Putting all the emotion and anger aside, what is the harm in playing it safe rather than sorry? What is wrong with being vigilant just in case?
@mikeyoneill81 Answer: If australia uses taxation to force polluting industry away, they will go to china and be given free reign to pollute as much as they want without control. Cost is australian jobs, and higher cost of living. We pay more for electricity. The benefit? We get to pay these new chinese steel mills to produce materials to make our new wind turbines, causing severe pollution anyway.
Look for the science, not the propaganda saying the earth is dying.
These guys are nothing but neo-Marxists. Their cognitive process is that of prior eugenicist's that have tried in the past to cull the unfit and profane public. I say, if they are concerned with too many people they jump first!
@rainwilds There is nothing in this clip to support your claim that Steffen or any other prominent advocate of mitigation is a Marxist or a eugenicist or that they wish to "cull" anyone. If you object to mitigation of CO2 & other GHG emissions, outline why, using sound evidence and modelling. For those interested in evidence-based responses in YouTube format, google the series "climate crock of the week" which debunks the most common RW cultist talking points. Follow me on Twitter @fran_b__
@franb2222 Fran, plainly you're the one that should be doing the 'googling' try: "The 96-to-present smear of skeptic scientists - Climategate Country Club" for starters.
@franb2222 Why mitigate a life giving gas? Face it; this story about "run-away" global warming has been dead for a while now. It has been proven to be a fraud with scientist colluding with each other for grants, big banks funding campaigns, and big oil on-board. Just look at how many scientist don't believe the scam for a second. Google 'global warming petition project' and 'the green agenda' for the hard truth. You won't get it from mainstream media.
Bollocks
OtagoMark 6 months ago
Just say for a moment that you are right and human induced Climate Change isn't happening. What is the real harm if we go ahead and invest in renewable energies anyway and it turns out we didn't need to? Who's going to die? Surely this is better than doing nothing and facing the consequences if you are wrong. So my question is this - Putting all the emotion and anger aside, what is the harm in playing it safe rather than sorry? What is wrong with being vigilant just in case?
mikeyoneill81 9 months ago
@mikeyoneill81 Answer: If australia uses taxation to force polluting industry away, they will go to china and be given free reign to pollute as much as they want without control. Cost is australian jobs, and higher cost of living. We pay more for electricity. The benefit? We get to pay these new chinese steel mills to produce materials to make our new wind turbines, causing severe pollution anyway.
Look for the science, not the propaganda saying the earth is dying.
LordFabs 9 months ago
These guys are nothing but neo-Marxists. Their cognitive process is that of prior eugenicist's that have tried in the past to cull the unfit and profane public. I say, if they are concerned with too many people they jump first!
rainwilds 9 months ago
@rainwilds There is nothing in this clip to support your claim that Steffen or any other prominent advocate of mitigation is a Marxist or a eugenicist or that they wish to "cull" anyone. If you object to mitigation of CO2 & other GHG emissions, outline why, using sound evidence and modelling. For those interested in evidence-based responses in YouTube format, google the series "climate crock of the week" which debunks the most common RW cultist talking points. Follow me on Twitter @fran_b__
franb2222 9 months ago
@franb2222 Fran, plainly you're the one that should be doing the 'googling' try: "The 96-to-present smear of skeptic scientists - Climategate Country Club" for starters.
Srekwah 9 months ago
@franb2222 Why mitigate a life giving gas? Face it; this story about "run-away" global warming has been dead for a while now. It has been proven to be a fraud with scientist colluding with each other for grants, big banks funding campaigns, and big oil on-board. Just look at how many scientist don't believe the scam for a second. Google 'global warming petition project' and 'the green agenda' for the hard truth. You won't get it from mainstream media.
rainwilds 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@franb2222 " If you object to mitigation of CO2 & other GHG emissions, outline why"
Humans inhale O2 and exhale CO2. Trees absorb C02 and release O2 - See how nicely it works!
Forests and plant life growth has increased by approx 40% over the last 50 years, thanks to CO2.
m1kereport 9 months ago
@rainwilds Bravo, I couldn’t have put it better. Jump you Marxist bastards; I’ll be happy to give you a push. Sick bastards
toranacar 9 months ago