Added: 4 years ago
From: sillas09
Views: 391,393
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,003)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • But will it blend?

  • The indian and pakistains is the best for iran. oO

  • Suck USA!

  • 383,000 views thats rare with last 3 numbers 0

  • Lol what the fuck was that guy screaming

  • @z93blitz1 persian.

  • katalavainei kaneis ti leei?

    ;SS

  • subtitles would be good

    

  • Iran USA will take control of your air in 1 day trust me.you guys have heart and a good big army but USA is so powerful that our missiles will kill your radars,capital,headquarters,be­fore you see them.and our army will control the ground in 5 days with hes apache,cobra,thunderbolt wiping out your tanks and apc.

  • @netty4885 Just like good old days in Vietnam?

  • iran is having a progress towards worlwide destruction

  • Greetings from Russia, we support you, friends)))

  • 82 zionist dislikes 

  • USA altering oil not war and some stage involved with war just to get oil but for Iran USA doesn't to get in war because of oil.!!

    USA got Iranian oil already by Arab world why USA attack Iran .??

    Come on stupid iranian wake up.!!

  • @0172shane Iran is one of the few remaining countries in the world that has managed to maintain total sovereign control over its oil resources and exports. What are you talking about?

  • @0172shane BEgo

  • @0172shane That's not the point there are other countries other then just USA >.> plus USA's top supplier of Oil and natural gas is Canada they don't really need the middle east they just want it...

  • The Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) says Iran has managed to upgrade the Russian-made long-range S-200 air defense system into an entirely new apparatus.

    IRGC Air Defense Commander Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili said Iran has introduced such wholesale enhancements into the system that it can be assigned a new name, Fars News Agency reported on Tuesday.

    He said the system has been wholly optimized that its configuration totally differs from what the Russians had designed.

    (presstv.ir)

  • @sillas09 press copy / paste? haven't you learned yet that tv and press are only tools of propaganda?

  • @phorias If you find other sources of information outside of the press, go ahead and post them.

  • To drop a bomb to Iran, I think the USA must fly very high so it won't get hit by this missile

  • @maijib2009 This once can reach up to 40km in altitude. You can take these out by using cruise missiles though, unless they have it covered by SR SAM.

  • thats nice.. but Iran have to be aware that ,the day Israel/US choose to atack Iran nuclear facilities. it will be using med range missiles *BUT* only after thousands of false flying targets. So be carefull to not waste your best missiles in flying toys.that only purpose will be to keep busy/reduce their defense system . that will be Iran mayor problem .their airspace will be tested and overwhelmed with many hundreds false targets so that their real missiles can hit the nuclear facilities.

  • you'd be hoping Iraq was here now to give those pesky Iranians some resistance but thanks to the US it cant...

  • is he saying salami and sausauges are two things that make a sandwich

  • Obviously if you think Americans are racist and you hate it then why don't all of you foreigners stay out of our country and stop livin off our system!

  • @sabotslug94 stop come here? who want to go you america other than mexicans and chinese ppl?

  • @sabotslug94

    shut up you stupid fat potato american pig ignorant child!

    you tell us to stay away from you? we would love it but you keep coming to our countries!

  • When ever I hear someone shout "allahu akbar " to a launched missile, I cant help thinking of terrorism... Don't know why...

  • @B525shot the mass-media manipulated you in thinking terrorists exist. Mass-Media is owned by political parties. Make the simple math

  • @phorias oh please, go on, I love fairy tales :D

  • @B525shot Who are the 2 countries world wide invading other countries/territories and bombing everything that moves, killing even Civilians? Simple: The USA and Israel. Since 1 April 1979(after the Iranian Revolution) Iran didn't invade, nor threatened any other country. I couldn't say the same thing about the USA and Israel. They had and have right now a lot of wars going on. Is this the simple math I was looking for?

  • @phorias sorry but the "iran did not threaten other countries" part is not correct, jolly good sir.

  • Comment removed

  • @rosederek88 what if i was saudi or british, greek, iranian or even american do u think u could judge me? do U think u have the right to judge anyone but ur self? damn u racist people.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @rayinz101 well first I know your not really american if you where u wouldnt judge us like you do and secondly I want to know what the hell gives you the right too judge other people such as the american people like you do.

  • @rosederek88 haha Dam , should i start listing your impressive record of war crime's?

  • @rosederek88 does it matter?

  • Comment removed

  • @rosederek88 silly and ignorant americans. im amazed and disgust that u people still have not changed.

  • Comment removed

  • @13soldierboy13 Well what has 9/11 to do with this? Terrorism existed long before that you know... And it isn't even 100% certain that terrorists had anything to do with it. So just because bush confirmed that the planes were hijacked by terrorists doesn't mean that the terrorists really did it. You know, presidents use lie. Governments use to lie. So why would someone trust them. Anyways, I don't like or support terrorism but it feels wrong that people think that every arab is a terrorist.

  • @XtremedesyrWoWSC First of all, not every single arab is a terrorist.. Secondly, There are no "Antomic" weapons. And then what makes you think they are motherfuckers? Do not comment unless you really can speak and understand something...

  • Xtreme do you mean anatomic or atomic? Learn to spell.

  • @brettjripply if they gave us all their oil they would be broke.

  • lol, when i saw the picture of the video, i thought he holding that

  • @XtremedesyrWoWSC The only war the Islamic Republic of Iran has ever had was in the 1980's when it was defending itself from Iraq under Saddam Hussein. The PMOI (terrorist group) have been driven out of Iran into Iraq and they recently executed the leader of the only remaining terrorist group Jundullah. Meanwhile, the U.S. leads a NATO crusade against every Muslim country at the first opportunity. The only terrorists are the Western hypocrite and their "terrorist" propaganda.

  • @MyNameIsYourDaddy well if they would just give us all there oil we wouldnt b in this mess

  • Iran has proved that muslim world no more backward .

  • MashAllah

    

  • MashAllah

    

  • its like a big bottle rocket...

  • could have added subs.... lol

  • THATS ALL YOU NUT JOB SAY ALLAHA UBAH,,OR WHAT EVER IT IS ,,AND BY THE WAY BIG DEAL, I CAN NOT WAIT FOR THE DAY WHEN THE WEST SAYS TO THE MIDEAST DRINK YOUR OIL WE DON'T WANT IT NO MORE, THAT WILL BE A GOOD DAY

  • u make million itom bombs, u still cant win over israel.... coz god protects israel... if u dont belive me read quran, torah, bible.... look at 1948 war, when 1 israeli=200 arab.... still israel won without any tank...

  • @pakijew4 1=200 Arabs? distort history much? what is this? this is not Hollywood...

    LOL.

    The Israeli armed forces outnumbered the Arabs. FACT.

  • @5233484 ...in case u cant read, or just belive stories from ur forfathers....... google it and find it urself..... im sure muslims love to lie and deny.....but i can send u link if u like ....

  • @pakijew4  I can site sources... you just blatantly lie.

    The Arabs were outnumbered.. the Israelis were in the hundred thousand +... while the Arab armies were lower than that.

    Israel victimizes itself a LOT! Even if 4 or more countries attacked, most of them except Egypt and Syria sent like 5,000 soldiers. That is nothing in modern warfare.

    Go read some books you idiot.

  • @5233484 ..ha thats how losers talk....u read books.... u attck the next day israel was born.... outnumberd u guys, u still a sleep....any way leave u there

  • @pakijew4 what the fuck? Construct a fucking sentence, will you?

    How is "reading books" looser talk!? You lied, and I caught your bluff. Get over yourself.

  • There is an epic nerd battle going downstairs... 

  • bombs should be illegal in iraq. just saying...

  • if i had 17000 missiles .....i would shoot 17000 salilites

  • one person dies every 3.6 seconds of starvation somewhere in the world

  • ill igot to say is our rokets take us to the moon you guys have a long way to go not even worth my time

  • like if at the end of the video you got a little nervous wondering where those missiles came down

  • There are no terrorists in Iran, what is wrong when you are defending your own land?

    STOP ANOTHER WAR!!!

    The CIA is the mother of terrorism!

    You are looking for Terrorists, u will find them in the US-goverment.

    They killed their own people at 9/11!

    Wars are only forays for the indebted super powers!!!

    SAVE PERSIA FROM THE WOLFS!!!

  • Listen Irani people i dont like the logo of your news channel... it is illuminatti logo.

  • 1:03 WOW

  • Long Live Islamic Republic of IRAN....Love To IRAN Great and Brave Leaders and Brave Nation....With love From Pakistan

  • this thing can drop birds from the sky i mean real bird only LOL

  • poor iran,what a pity

  • we have a nuce, none nucelear warhead that can go to any point in the entire planet in less that 30 minuets. i think if things go from bad to worse we can handle it.

  • people you are so stupid, we do train our soldiers to fight of iraqi soldiers but the problem is that we are fighting terrests that hide in caves that is also mixed with the soldiers in iraq, but we have nucelear and none nuclear missiles that can be launge and get to any point in the u.s. in 30 minutes

  • i´m from Albania, married to a wonderful persian lady, i hate the islamic republic of iran, but don´t underestimate the iranian army, the islamic disiguting republic army is very strong unfortunately

  • @n30r u'll be burned

  • @sodmodwatanabe

    Still you are too dumb to write in english.

    And still those dicks screaming Allahu Akbar are Fucktards

  • ooh shit we need to stop IRAN

  • @n30r get siktir oz bashivi eshaay

  • @sodmodwatanabe

    Whatcha talking about you idiot?

  • @n30r idiot is your dad

  • @sodmodwatanabe

    English. Do you speak it, motherfucker?

  • still... i dont want that thing chasing me hahaa

  • Hey_ÅñY0ne_wäÑÑâ_chat_wIth_mê_­í_feel_sô_løÑÊlý_tØdÀý≡

  • I seen in the description and i quote "The major powers will never manage to prevent Tehran from progressing in all areas of science, society, ecomony or politics." I'm guessing major powers might include America. America doesn't mind if Iran pursues PEACEFUL technology but weapons of mass destruction have no place on Earth and America is trying to eliminate the remaining weapons to prevent catastrophe. But since Iran censors everything no one in Iran will be able to read this post.

  • @holyphantomcow Yeah, well, why don't they start with themselves, instead of bullying Iran which does not even own nor produce such weapons? How about Israel with its 200 nukes and stubborn refusal to disarm or join the NPT? The US government's inaction in those areas is just another proof that its so-called "worries" about Iran's peaceful nuclear program are a pretext to sanction and harass Iran. 

  • @holyphantomcow How come America, the country which constantly invades others, gets to say who can and cant have nukes?

  • Considering the ratio, it's pretty good, of course casualty death is NEVER good. Regardless, your comment is extremely.. how should I put it.. idiotic. You think because the US is still engaged in war that it equates to 'losing' a war? Most of it is political and the rest is logistical side stepping to avoid bad PR.

    Also, call me when you handle the "Zionist Regime", then we can talk.

  • @KommandantKavu So are you trying to say that 10 years of intensive military engagement supported by every US ally, trillions of taxpayer money and thousands of American lives, which has so far not even managed to decisively weaken, let alone defeat a number of rag-tag militias in one of the poorest countries of the world, is some kind of a brilliant achievement, militarily speaking? Do you realize, then, what consequences an aggression against Iran would have for the US?

  • @sillas09

    Yes the consequnces would be a free Iran.

    Most Iranians have no choice who their leaders are.

  • @jabberwolf That's a biased notion, propagated by the western governments and media. Iran is free and democratic, people elect their leaders. Also, the results of the US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan were war and more war, hundreds of thousands of dead civilians, environmental catastrophy due to the use of depleted uranium shells, destruction of the infrastructures, and local governments struggling to maintain their national unity and territorial integrity... not greater freedom.

  • @sillas09 we have no reason to attack iran. just saying. we might have a great military, BUT we are not compared to guerrila fighters. we are compared with other militarys that are assembled. like germany and china. we are not compared to the taliban. and we DID destroy saudaams army and military. we succeeded in that. wich i appluad, he killed hundreds of thousands of kurds. but its time to get out of iraq. and leanr new tactics.

  • @sillas09 We got Osama Bin Laden whether you choose to believe it or not is not the issue. Our goal was not to conquer the countries we invaded. Our goal is much harder to achieve than a military victory over a country. Our goal is to help provide a war torn country with a firm footing for the future. For everything we destroy we rebuild and try to make things better. Whether or not that country wishes to better itself is not our concern. We can't help those that will not help themselves

  • @holyphantomcow those countries were far better off before US invasion and thats a fact no evidence you can provide will change that or convince anybody thats educated otherwise. (ps iraq was invaded because of fabricated WMD evidence, not for humanitarian reasons)

  • @toplicajakovljevic If you call marshal law and killing civilians that simply stated there opinions better then i guess they were. Do you recall what happened to Saddam Hussein after being given a trial? He was brought into the streets and hung for crimes against humanity. The USA isn't perfect and NO ONE IS! At least we are trying rebuild and make it a better place even though we ourselves are in financial trouble. We have worked hard to rebuild what we destroyed but it takes time to do so.

  • @holyphantomcow its people like you that will eventually allow the government to screw us over just like they do indiscriminantly abroad

  • @holyphantomcow oh and by the way, hitler was elected in a fully democratic society. DEMOCRACY hoorah kill the n*ggers and jews and allah akbars cuz thats what we do in this here usa.

  • Respond to this video...  iran deosnt have a dictator either

  • @toplicajakovljevic Lastly we could have pulled out once we eradicated evil leaders but we haven't because we don't just blow a countries military up, topple a government, remove organisations that seek to harm innocents then run back home and say JOB WELL DONE! No that's not what we do. We stay make sure they can defend themselves while providing financial support. Furthermore we didn't just go over there and say your part of the USA now. We are giving them a CHOICE for their FUTURE!

  • @holyphantomcow dont say we unless your a government employee! everything in your reply is false. there are so many instinces where the us GOVERNMENT installed dictators or sold weapons illegally and even helped create the the taliban in the 80's. your too much of a patriot to have a real voice. i wouldnt believe a word out of your mouth even if some of that crap about the GOVERNMENT being benevolent is true. where was the us army in darfur or rwanda? (p.s. you provided not one shred of evidence

  • @toplicajakovljevic Ok I won't say we my bad. I guess i thought since the USA listens to it's people I WAS PART OF THE GOVERNMENT. I'm a citizen and vote for the people I want in power in the USA and vocally voice my opinion to them and they listen but they are the decision makers I am an influence in that decision. anyway you implied we invade countries to much now your saying we haven't done enough MAKE UP YOUR MIND PLEASE. Evidence is hard to post on here when LINKS ARE DISABLED!

  • @holyphantomcow iran deosnt have a dictator either. and as for your WMD argument the US government already lied about that shit in iraq, they'll do it to iran if need be

  • @holyphantomcow i sincerely hope your opinions help you sleep at night but i find it hard to be a US citizen without feeling guilty. and yeah oppression is better than starvation

  • @toplicajakovljevic Thanks for the concern about my sleep and obviously not one moment goes by I don't think about the lives America has changed forever. What was an Oppressive leader doing to help starvation? Excuse me for saying but a lot of people in this world need help we have and are still trying to help everyone in need. Proof of which is the financial state we are in now. Who are you to preach about this unless you are a volunteer helping to provide them with food. I send my donations!

  • @holyphantomcow your an idiot friend. your words are uneducated. i dont care if you donate a dollar a month so some iraqi kid has enough energy to tug one out (preferably on your argument). the real terrorists are in washington doing illegal things both here and abroad and nobody can stop them. thats scarier than any missile DEFENSE system on the planet. also dictators arent that bad, maybe they dont help starvation but they dont cause it either though you probably wont believe that.

  • I lol everytime I hear people yelling "Allah Akbar" in the background... Now I'm thinking "IT'S A TRAP!"

    Also, insert random anti-America or US thing to get a bunch of thumbs up despite being explicitly misinformed. -- Does anyone know how you general measure firepower and effectiveness?

    4,438 US Coalition Casualities

    18,832 Iraqi Insurgent Casualities

    Excluding:

    119,752 Detained

    Finally:

    109,423 Civilians (Killed by Suicide Bombers, Coalition and Extra Judicial Executions)

  • @KommandantKavu In WW2, Germany also had a huge advantage over the USSR in terms of "kill ratio", but I am sure you know which side was victorious in that war. Same with Vietnam. If you really believe the "kill ratio" is what detemines the strategic outcome of a war, then you are quite delusional.

  • I love how everyone argues about how more bad ass every other countries military is opposed to another ones.....bottom line why the fuck does it matter they all kill people and make the world a shit hole.

  • @69oo69 There's one major difference though: Iran's armed forces are tasked with protecting their people against any invaders, not with invading or colonizing other nations. The US government, however, is threatening to use its military to invade Iran (although it has never dared), like it illegally invaded dozens of countries in the past sixty years.

  • @sillas09 I will respectfully agree that yes the american government has a very agressive aspect about their military operations, but the fact is war is just harsh, univiting, and outright miserable for each and every country involved its sad to say that war is a nessity for survival in todays world but that still does not excuse the fact that war takes the lives of innocents and people who beleive they're fighting for the right reasons. I beleive in the people not the government of any nation.

  • lol. We have just destroyed 100+ of those in Libya last week.

  • without german rocket development there would be no rockets

  • @blaugot Actualy the ancient chinese and indians were already using rockets, of course those are now called fireworks, but the idea was there. The germans did start the whole "lets make a rocket, put explosives on it, and send it hundreds of miles away at hundreds of miles per hour thing" pretty awesome....

  • none wins if theres a nuclear war thats all I want to say

  • Comment removed

  • Dear santa....

  • congrats brothers...........

  • They look like Germany in ww2 trying to launch a V2. Lets shoot a few off and see if we hit something other than ourselves.

  • @WDACZAR Nah, you got that wrong, it's the US forces that look like amateurs unable to defeat a barefoot militia in Afghanistan after 10 years! Lol.

  • @sillas09 Who said any thing about Afghanistan or there barefoot militia?

  • @sillas09 The odds are stacked against us man, theyre too powerful for the US in ways OTHER than technology, remember how farmers took down the worlds greatest army during the revolutionary war? same thing, just were the brits and the taliban are us...

  • @sillas09 LOL, you got that wrong

    We arent able to fire on sight, unless they have weapons and are seemingly hostile. They arent a "Barefoot militia" they're the Al-Qaeda.. Its like NATO against the Al-Qaeda. which is everyone else.Ok, thats exaggerated there is some neutrals, but the Al-Qaeda has, just SO many people, the ratios are like, 1:14 and the UK dropped out. Unless im thinking about Iraq, but thats over.

    we cant "defeat" them, because even if they're ALL dead, we gotta finda' Ho.

  • @gamin4lif3 All I am saying is that if the US is having major trouble (to say the least) in its 10-year long odyssey trying to defeat the Taliban, it will be mission impossible against a country like Iran, which is much more formidable an adversary than the Taliban.

  • @sillas09

    I fuckin' love you.

  • @sillas09 That may be true, but our Airforce will beat the fuck out of any other country!

  • @sillas09 why are you so mean to america? 

  • @MrThesuperman360 Look how mean some Americans, specially the US government, are to Iran, and generally to all developing nations. If you could take care of the Washington warmongers for us, we wouldn't need to defend ourselves against their aggressions. I am actually optimistic that American people will eventually wake up to reality, to how the US regime is exploiting them like the oppressed nations. I guess we'll see some major social/political upheavals in the US over the next 15-20 years.

  • @sillas09 Wrong. They keep coming & we keep slaughtering. We'll be there for 100 yrs. Killing & Killing & Killing. The kill ratio has to be well over 100:1.

  • @spfi38 100 years? In 100 years the US will probably not exist anymore as we know it, probably split into different entities like the former Soviet Union.

  • @sillas09 i hate that comment, but its true. we teain our troops to fight organized military, not rebel fighters.

  • @singsam271 Iran will greet any invader with a huge rebel fighting force trained and specialized in asymmetric war, only better equipped, motivated and organized than the average guerilla.

  • @sillas09 ya. the U.S. would be well set. we all have a gun. and we love our country.but i live in the northwest, where everyone is a sissy liberal -_- its really sad.

  • @sillas09 also, im not saying we are better than iran. just letting you know. im not comparing the two

  • @sillas09, they don't even want to, that's the biggest joke.

    The Taliban and al-Qaeda are good in the 80's...okay in the 90's....evil from '01-'10....now we help the al-Qaeda elements in Libya!

    It's one huge joke that cost peoples' lives.

  • @RebelGuy95 that's right some poeple has thearst for blood, money and power.

    i just ask my self, if being so stupid, would it be less painfull, when we pay the price?!

  • @docandy1000 I don't know.

    But all of this corruption and globalist bullshit, namely in the US, is setting the stage for nationalist leader to take charge.

    Sadly, most nationalist leaders are beholden to their own dark fantasies....Hitler, Napoleon, etc.

  • @RebelGuy95 Taliban didnt excist in the 80's, and they where far worse in the 90's, 01-10 and 1994 - 1996 is prob their best period...

  • @GrimmjowProduction Yeah it got its beginning in the 80's as the "Mujahideen" with the help of good 'ol boys like Charle Wilson and the CIA.

  • @RebelGuy95 No, it didn't excist back then, dont make me send a message to you filled with links about Taliban and their beginning.

  • @GrimmjowProduction, yes, it did, asshate. Send me files?...okay, Alex Jones.

    It was called the Mujahideen and it was funded by the CIA, which got the funding from Congress, obviously, almost solely due to the work of Wilson.

    Post-Russian - Afghan hostilities, Osama and all of those weapons worked closely with the Taliban government that we helped to install and formed al-Qaeda.

  • @GrimmjowProduction, shut the fuck up, it's been all over the news with respect to the possibility that Obama would arm the Libyan "Rebels."

    The Congress did the same thing in secret in the 80's with the Mujahideen and the end was result was a Taliban government in Afghanistan.

    Osama and al-Qaeda were in Afghanistan but the Taliban government wouldn't turn him over, so the US invaded. Those weapons and all of that support bit us in our arse.

  • @RebelGuy95 I sent you a message, there was loads of facts, even a document from an American embassy in Pakistan. Taliban didn't excist in the 80es, I dont care the other things you say, Im stating the truth here, THEY DIDNT EXCIST IN THE 80es... thats the point im trying to bring across, and they infact did offer to turn him over in change for proofs that it was him that perpetrated 9/11 you fucking spazz.

  • @GrimmjowProduction yes, the taliban existed, they took over afghanistan after the russians left. They refused to work with the US, or so it is claimed, 10 years later post-911

  • @RebelGuy95 I gave you sources they didn't excist, you fail to show me ur sources, to by the defintion of winning an arguement, I won due to lack of proof from ur side, u wouldn't hold a sec in a fucking courtroom if this shit was a trial.

    they took over 4-5 years after the Russians left...

  • @GrimmjowProduction, yeah, they took over in the 90s, and they harbored the men that the CIA empowered, like Osama, and consequently his al-Qaeda forces.

    I don't need to provide a source for common knowledge, and because this very shit has been all over the news since March, what's more.

  • @RebelGuy95 They never took over all of Afghanistan. And they took the capital in 1996. They didn't excist before 1994.

    And if you look at the fact, CIA only empowered the Afghans, not the Arabs such as Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, because they where financially supported by big arab bussiness men, such as Osama himself coming from a Rich saudi family.

    What you are stating, that Taliban excisted before 94, is not common knowledge, its retarded and false.

  • @GrimmjowProduction the Taliban existed in 1991 in Afghanistan, dolt.

    Why do you insist upon responding with inane nonsense - saying that the Taliban didn't exist prior to '94?

  • @RebelGuy95 Cuz thats the truth, show me ur sources that they existed in 1991, I brought you fucking reports and documents from US ambassy in Afghanistan, fuck that shit ur saying or the news is saying.

  • @sillas09 ummm id say you are wrong =] why would we want to defeat an enemy that we created..? We create the enemy so that we can invade w/e country we fill like....the "ENEMY" is small, stays hidden, and will never be defeated...egyptian news said recently osama died in 2002 of kidney failure...we are there cuz we want to be no doubt about that

  • @sillas09 You cant defeat people who are religous because they never stop fighting and they will sacrifice there own kids They will fight until everyone of them are dead. they think they are fighting for god. Honestly the only way to beat someone like that is exterminate them. Which america would NEVER even think of doing. The american just want to disable them so they cannot attack america again. We know we can never eliminate a religious militia.

  • @meronmotors Iran never attacked the US nor anyone else.

  • Comment removed

  • @sillas09

    its hard when they use human shield or hide like mouses

  • @sillas09 It's not just defeating a barefoot militia, it's an insurgent war. That means they have to distinguish between civilians and insurgents, and once a target is in sight, either eyesight or spotted on drones or satellites, it's up to the time sensitive targeting team to make sure that the civilian damage is appropriate to the target, whether it's worth it. By the time a strike is authorized, the target has often slipped away. Read the book "Running the war in iraq" by Jim Molan.

  • @funnyasbrother Whatever it is, they just cannot be beat, simple as that. The U.S has the advantage in firepower,aircraft and armor, the insurgents have the edge on guerrilla warfare plain and simple. What else is there to argue?

  • @enchilada01 Agreed, as long as they decide to resist the US, which it seems they'll never stop doing, the US can never defeat them entirely.

  • @funnyasbrother It does not matter what armament a country has. If another has determination to resist, they will find ways to do it, unless they get wiped out by nukes but that is very unlikely to happen

  • @sillas09 Ive been saying that for years, americans think they are so bad ass but will NEVER test a 1:1 battle

    against a country with any real ballz, like... north korea... thats one they wont win.

  • @samljer aare you fucking me north korea couldn't even get a nuke to work right all they can do is just make a cover up story and the war in korea wasnt one on one when we were so close to victory China stepped in and drove us back to where the wat had began and if you look at the comparison of back then and now the maps are very much the same most countries can't even fight one on one no matter how sophisticated their technology is

  • @sillas09 that's because the barefoot militia is made up of a bunch of cowards who never stand and fight and hide behind women and children. america could kill them all, but millions of civilians would die with them.

  • @WDACZAR  Don't know where you get that. They're pretty advanced and potent force in the region, soon with nuke capabilities and subs, and amazing anti-aircraft guns.

  • @WDACZAR United States has the most powerful military and the latest technology including missile defence systems, stealth fiter jets, submarines, unmanned drones etc AND YOU STILL GET YOUR ASS HANDED TO YOU by men in pygamas and ak47's. Imagine what damage a country with an actual military can do to you.

  • Hit an AWACS with that thing and the whole U.S. air power in the area is scattered and lost.

  • @lemob182 The Americans will send Electronic Warfare Planes first.They detect and shut down all radars in the area (by overflowing the system with fake signals) so the SAM cant target anything. Then they send the AWACS with Air Superiority Jet Fighters and Ground Attack Planes to take care of the SAM sites.

  • @7Niwde7 iran know that! dont tryi

  • hehe boom

  • @sillas09 "oil doesn't run out, its not water" than what did u mean by this? surely you're referring to fossil fuels

  • @KEBAB905 I did not write that, you have been confusing me with someone else.

  • This rocket is not ecological approved!!! :-)))