@Philofor21 loool mate real the old bible u ll understand what ur parents re hiding from u hahahahahahah, u ll understand who re the devil dear heheheheheh, do u ever ask urself why did they change what was in the bible? and why white people dont ve cuture i mean proper culture, and tradition like other race?
ps looncraz, Dummy, Les Paul, a white guy, invented the electric guitar, ok? The only thing you ever invented was a lie! I've seen that so-called list of black inventors, which is totally bogus, except for the part about peanut butter.
@Wanda7771 you must be a twelve yr old.the guitar comes before electricity asswipeniod.start with the banjo and you'll be on the right track.NOT THE ELECTRIC BANJO NETHERLANDERER!!the rehhhhhhguhluh one dumbass.
All this Race and IQ stuff is lies and racist propaganda actual scientists even said that it doesn't matter what race you are!. I know this is true because I am smarter then lots of White people my age, trust me.
humans have always being humans, these monkey skeletons are just that, monkeys. we don't give birth to monkeys or monkeys give birth to humans. no amount of time changes our basic structure. God made us just the way we are.
The first eauropeans were African people who left Africa. The funny thing is the bible speaks of human history. Adam and Eve had twins called cain and abel.One kill the other and was banished out of Africa. That child that was banished out of africa mated with neandrthals, and that is how the other races came to be. Every race originated from the African race. Why is it that every race out of Africa has neanderthat genes? Africa is the original race. That face is pure Afric, but racis wont like
look it is what it is and there is no changing the truth even for those who does not want to face the truth. i am not proud of my white ancestory but unfortunately i have to live that and so do u.
This isn't correct, but it isn't far off. N. Africans during the time were much lighter with smaller noses and those are the ones who migrated into Europe.
They looked more like modern Indians than modern blacks.
Then again, pigment can change pretty quickly, as can soft structures... so this individual could be accurately reconstructed, but it is not representative of the earliest Europeans.
At the very least, the bridge of his/her nose should be higher. But if that's how early Europeans looked, I'm not going to get all butthurt about it. I only hope they're not just being PC.
MOFO'S CAN'T EXCEPT THAT AFRICAN PEOPLE WERE THE FIRST PEOPLE ON EARTH AND THE TRUE BIRTH OF CIVILIZATION. YOU CAN MAKE FUN DOESN'T MATTER FACT'S OR FACT'S. PICKUP A BOOKDO RESERCH THEN YOU CAN FIND THE TRUTH. DON'T DEPEND ON PREJUDICE!!!1
The real problem is that it wasn't the dark-skinned Africans that migrated, it was the lighter skinned ones ( from North Africa ). The pigment in the video is wrong, and the soft-tissue part of the nose is wrong.
That's funny. Dark brown skin and African facial features added to a Caucasian skull. And it is a white man's skull, evidenced by several features, including the squarish eye sockets and triangular nasal openings. No wonder the thing looks like a freak!! I am laughing my white ass off!!
Well, they do say Africa was the cradle of civilization/ humanity. Point is that Caucasians today obviously look different from subcontinental Africans, not to mention other races look different from Africans as well. We should realize that our origins are similar and stop racism.
No the cradle of civilization was Mesopotamia( modern day Iraq). But the origin of humanity was Africa, it's just that civilization didn't arise until much later.
I'd agree with that broadly, but I think that the reconstruction was ideologically inspired. Ideology is within the realm of politics, and in political (and not strictly scientific) terms, Europeans are a distinct etho-cultural group, in their own right, irrespective of close racial ties with Persian and Indians. I think the Semites are not strictly European however.
@Vot63 Well nobody said that Semites were Europeans. Only that they are Caucasians. A European is always a Caucasian but a Caucasian is not always a European. Europeans are only one branch of a much larger family tree. In Europe, we don't feel racial kinship though. Only cultural. My own country considers itself connected to three or four other countries but feels very little kinship with others, simply because only those 3 or 4 countries have similar culture.
@Vot63 Don't forget to add my name next time. You've forgotten to add my name in your replies to me a couple of times. That's pretty much like wanting to talk to a person on the phone but forgetting to dial the number hehe
@Vot63 An example of kinship through culture would be the following: My country is a Western country. So we feel some kinship with ALL western countries. We share some common traits and beliefs. An african-american is western so we will feel some kinship with him despite him being a completely different race. Russians are of the same race as us but we feel VERY little kinship with them. They are much more foreign to us than the very foreign looking African-Americans.
I'm not convinced that there is evidence for the claim that modern San resemble the first Kenyan human skeleton.
You say that the earliest negro skeleton is 9,000 years old. I understand that the human population traveled to and proliferated in Asia, and returned to Europe and Africa in large numbers about 10,000 years ago. I'd say the evidence does indicate that the European and Black races are modern races, so I don't dispute your facts in that area.
@Vot63 Modern races both, the European and Congoid (for lack of a better word; black gets to confusing). But so are the mongoloid race though. None of the races that exists today existed back then. Mankind had an entirely different make-up of races that we know nothing of today. From everything that I've read though, the San is the only people that resembles what we once all used to look like because they look like the humans from the time before mankind left the African continent.
@Vot63 One thing I would like to add though; I don't really prescribe to Europeans being a race. Yes, we belong to a race but we belong to the same race as all other peoples who can trace their origins to the Caucasus, like Arabs, certain Afghan peoples, certain Indian peoples, Persians etc.
No remains found in europe are Caucasian or have (erroneous deceiving) caucasoid phenotypes, none and GRIMALDI MAN (negroid) who is deemed modern anatomically pre dates all other humans in europe, fact there have been a few Caucasian mummies found in china called the Tarmarin mummies which ARE the oldests caucasians (1800bce) Johann F Blumenbach coined the word Caucasian, he claimed after the most beutiful whites, but thats NOT the real reason, the Caucasian Man is not indigenous to NO landmass
@PupuTheClown why is it so surprising that the very first europeans would be darker in skin and with tropical features such as a broad nose and thicker lips? After all, when we first came to europe we were not that long out of africa so we could very possibly still have tropical features.
@mjohanss1975 But here's what cracks me up... do you realise that CAUCASOID phenotypes existed BEFORE the arrival of CAUCASIANS, fact also. Scientist have now deemed ''RACE'' as a social misconstruct, why because they know that anyone with half a brain would realise that there is only 1 race of Man on the planet and he's black, genetic mutations occur in ALL non blacks, fact and technically you CANNOT call non blacks full human, but hybrids
@WesleySniperS1 oh damn...you're one of those people. That was some of the most unscientific hogwash that has ever been uttered. Do you know why people like you go on Youtube and say the things you do? Because there are no censors of any kind here. All morons are welcome to say whatever dumb thing they can think of. You are a sad, pathetic little person. I bet you're the kind of person that didn't even flinch when Kamau Kambon said the things he said.
@mjohanss1975 lol before you start foaming around the mouth.. prove me wrong... you came up with the San people nonsense like thats credible... lol... and it explains the white race's arrival... my friend I could really teach you about how and when you came along... but I know it'll alter your world view forever... yes and what Kamau Kambon said is correct, do you know genocide appears in the bible, guess what... it's your race, go check it out... you ppl are here by default my friend..
@WesleySniperS1 If you want evidence, there is mountains upon mountains of evidence that supports my views. You are the one with a theory that differ from everything that has even been written so the onus is on you to provide evidence. So far you have provided none. If I say that the moon is made of cheese and you disagree is it then on you to provide evidence? No, it would be on me because what I said goes against everything that has even been documented. So prove your "moon-cheese" theory.
@WesleySniperS1 You will have to prove yourself much more intelligent anf far more educated than that fool Kambon if you wish to have any hope of proving anything though. Seeing how you agree with what he had to say, I highly doubt you will be able though. The only one who will follow a fool is an even bigger fool.
@WesleySniperS1 Here is where you theories completely fall apart, however:
1: Cro Magnon man existed long before they entered Europe and met Neanderthal man. Thus, it is impossible for Cro Magnon man to be the offspring of black women and neanderthal men as you claim.
2: The scientific name for neanderthal man is Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis and they were every bit a part of the Homo genus as you or I. Only a member of the Homo genus can have reproductive offspring with another Homo.
@WesleySniperS1 5: You are an African American. As such, almost ALL of your non-european DNA comes from West Africa. You claim Caucasians aren't indigenous to any landmass. Untrue. But your own ancestors are indigenous to West Africa ONLY. There were no Bantu-speaking peoples anywhere south of W Africa but as they exterminated all the indigenous San, they established themselves as indigenous all the way to the Cape. This, also, is an established fact.
@mjohanss1975 WTF... are you on about.. leave black origins to black people... my ancestors were North East African... i'm shemitic by blood.. proven.. who the fcuk is bantu... were they the first africans or was they the first race of blacks you fool... most so called africans... are shemitic...there is only 4 races of africans... its a fact.. Johann Blumenbach coined the 3 races... Africa NEVER had borders until whites came along... blacks not only lived in africa..
@mjohanss1975 blacks were the original ppl's of IRAN, EYGPT,YEMEN, MOROCCO,IRAQ, SAUDI ARABIA, AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN, that was all part of the ethiopian kingdom.. ruled by the king of Axum... the ancient egyptians had colonys in the now so called middle east, which was given that name by a british general.. after the suez was created to seperate the middle east (north east africa) from the african continent.. but whats it the middle of?... lol.. name me 1 landmass where whites are indigenous too
@mjohanss1975 Arabs only arrived in north east africa in the 6th century AD.. (ottoman turk islamic invasion) the Medes (todays iranians) were the first asians to come into north east africa, they are not arabs. Name me the country of indigenous white people, bere in mind though the oldest found remains of a PROVEN caucasian was found in 1800BCE in CHINA.. but only a few bodies
@mjohanss1975 lol gone are the days when newly arrived whites on the planet.. will tell us blacks who were here from the begining and created by NO other race but god alone, you whites love to alter history and come up with mad THEORYS to make you feel like you really belong here on earth lol... like we don't know our own histories.. lol... we know the entire earths history my friend..
@WesleySniperS1 '' lol gone are the days when newly arrived whites on the planet.. will tell us blacks who were here from the begining and created by NO other race but god alone'' So you think white people are aliens?
No such thing as god, and you have to remember that whites are more evolved than blacks ( due to environmental challenges ), have higher brain capabilities ( on average ), and large differences in muscular and even skeletal structure ( Africans are more robust due to their survival advantages in Africa ).
N. Africans are less robust because survival was easier with less natural predators to fend off, those peoples migrated to the rest of the world and evolved. Blacks did not....
@looncraz ''No such thing as god, and you have to remember that whites are more evolved than blacks'' Your entire concept is wrong, to be ''less evolved'' evolution would have to stop, but it doesn't. Also Black people is a much broader term than white people so you simply can not squeeze them into one category.
Evolution is "needs-derived." Blacks have had less need to evolve away from their state for many reasons, namely environment.
Blacks have failed continually to thrive in creating large society as they have had no reason to develop those skills and to favor related genes. Blacks will punch when scared, whites will normally try to evaluate the situation. This is fight/flight response due to evolutionary pressures. Whites had to work together, blacks have more of a pack mentality.
@looncraz You say in your channel that you search for the truth when it sounds a bit like you're trying to create one for yourself, and do not listen even if anyone has a valid argument. First of all ''civilization'' is only below
10 000 years in human evolution (even less in Europe), which is quite a short time in context. That's why it probably hasn't had time to drastically change us. And also there were west African kingdoms by the time the American slave trade started.
Humans evolve rapidly, but grouping has occurred for likely a solid 100,000 years or more, even Neanderthals lived in communities 40ka. Civilization, as we know it, is a product of farming. Nomadic tribes were common before. The harsher the environment, the greater the need for cooperation, and cold is the harshness that requires pre-planning and organization.
Blacks are not any more diverse than whites, the line between them isn't clean anyway... Self-ID'd blacks score lower.
@looncraz ''Blacks are not any more diverse than whites'' If you by black mean dark skinned African they sure as hell are. ''and cold is the harshness that requires pre-planning and organization.'' I don't see why. ''(this is a trait of Nordics, BTW)'' Another unscientific ''fact'' there is no Nordic race.
There is no greater diversity in one group than the other by pure skin color alone. Indeed, where one calls someone white or black is not even universally determined, and there are more mutts than anything.
Cold FORCES people TOGETHER for warmth, shelter, supplies, and defense. In a warm environment the only such motivator is water, but it is a poor comparison.
Nordics are a sub-race of whites, if you want to call them that. The white race is filled with internal divisions...
@looncraz ''There is no greater diversity in one group than the other by pure skin color alone.'' According to the current belief all humans originate from Africa, that's why you can't compare Africans to Europeans. That's why there are Pygmyes averaging at 150cm and Masai at 190cm both in Africa. ''Indeed, where one calls someone white or black is not even universally determined, and there are more mutts than anything.'' And yet you use the term. How do you define it?
You can, certainly, compare Africans to Europeans. I define black as being greater than 2/3ds black african ( tribal African, whatever).
However, most studies use self-reporting. Normally people who are as little as 30% "black" will identify themselves as such in the U.S.. Considering their IQs average 85 in the U.S. shows an IMPROVEMENT by the European gene infusion and culture. Black Africans average IQ is 70 in Africa.
However, genetically, it is Euros vs middle Africans.
@frenchhy Pretty close to it, yes. Factually, provably.
80% of whites have an I.Q. higher than the average black person(85), 20% of black have a higher I.Q. than the white average (100) - in the United States.
The black African I.Q. **AVERAGE** is a VERY low 70 - which should explain why Africa is so messed up...
@looncraz You do realize I.Q. tests weren't made to for other cultures. The questions on the tests come from common things a person should know. How can you tell someone what they should know. Its funny how white people really think they are so smart.
The I.Q. tests in question or international culture-agnostic tests.
Further, considering the black AMERICAN I.Q. is 15% lower than the white AMERICAN I.Q. is damning evidence.
That and the actual CAUSE is known and verified through GENETICS...
You can't fake DNA and physical differences between the "races."
Africans didn't have the same fight for survival as other races and were barely sociable, so I.Q. is expected to be lower. Evolution lifted whites/Asians and skipped blacks.
@looncraz Your joking right, the barbaric Anglo Saxons didn't even know how to write. When they visited Africa and the Middle East they picked up on different literate techniques. So how is it possible that white people, and of all races white people could be smarter.
@sambam2694 Never said whites were the smartest. Jews, technically, are the smartest (oh... wait... they're essentially white in your eyes...).
You are also very much incorrect, most white cultures had some form of written language, however, due to massive cultural diversity and cross-pollination, the languages evolved too rapidly for us to nail down any kind of winner. Besides, human evolution goes back MUCH longer than writing...
Africans had less need to cooperate than whites/Asians/Jews.
@sambam2694 Actually Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQs on average at 110. But they're an ethnic group, not a race. East Asians (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese) have the highest as a "race" at 105. Whites are at 100. Hispanics and Native Americans are in the low-mid 90s. African Americans are at 85. However, 95% of African Americans have white blood--about 25% on average. So if IQ and race are truly linked, this could be a factor why they score higher than black Africans, who average 70.
One need only look at what the respective races have accomplished over the course of history to determine "worthiness."
There are many different versions of I.Q. tests = they do favor socialized people, however even when blacks are raised in a white family as equals they fall behind the curve, there is no denying that!
Blacks have their own strengths, it just happens that grounded logic is not one of them.
@looncraz ..i will tell you this,, Looney tunes..lol..Go build the pyramids and then perhaps we can talk..or even a gas mask, but wait, what about the air condition.. and even more, the elevators..oops!,, cant for get the traffic light and still there's the Almanac,, oh my God! the electric Guitar..'play that funky music white boy'..yeah! lmbo here..Look Donald Duck...The I.Q test isnt based on Race silly..its a conspiracy to keeps blacks illiterate in america. proven after slavery..FACT..shhh.
@looncraz Africans didnt have the same fight for survival? Then please Explain to me why Africans Were immune to european diseases Whereas native-americans and aboriginals were not? also explain to me why the first european explorers to visit africa died in flocks? There were even parts of Africa (the Congo rainforest for example) That were so hostile they were known as the whitemans hell yet africans managed to survive there for thousands of years?
1. Africans had similar survival fights, epidemiologically, this is not to which I speak, I speak of social development as pertinent to evolutionary 'favoritism' resulting in a higher reliance on intellectual reasoning as individuals and as a whole.
2. Recent African emigrants would likely be those with the higher IQs - they were smart enough to leave Africa, after-all. Not to mention high U.S. standards of immigration.
@looncraz Also Explain why Recent African Immigrants (nigerian-americans for example) score higher on IQ test then US born whites?
You are just using pseudo-science to justify you're own racists believes and rather then looking for external/Cultural reasons as to why the IQ test migth be lower for Black americans such as poverty and the fact that most Black-americans living in the inner city grow up in single parent homes and often are not stimulated to learn or get educated.
@sambam2694 IQ test cultural bias was a HUGE 20th century concern, as data consistently showed that blacks routinely scored lower than whites. So by the 1960s, IQ tests were drawn up as culture-free as possible. Google IQ tests for samples. But blacks continue to score lowest even on word-free tests like Raven's Matrices, etc. Even Eskimos score higher IQ than blacks, though their culture is radically non-Western. Blacks officially score lowest on every intelligence test yet administered.
@frenchhy Pretty close to it, yes. Factually, provably.
80% of whites have an I.Q. higher than the average black person(85), 20% of black have a higher I.Q. than the white average (100) - in the United States.
The black African I.Q. **AVERAGE** is a VERY low 70 - which should explain why Africa is so messed up...
And much before. I can not stress the fact enough that you can not speak of black people as a race in the same manner as white people. It would be like calling all people outside of Africa + northern Africa the same race. The genetic variation is much greater there then anywhere else. As i recall hearing, animals that migrate from warm climates to cold don't tend to evolve less muscle mass but instead shorter limbs, and more compact limbs actually = more strength in theory.
Human evolution is marred by our brains. Instead of growing our bodies shorter and stouter (this is a trait of Nordics, BTW), we innovated and kept ourselves warm in other ways (furs). Also, such changes take longer than the time when we survived the extreme cold environments - I'm speaking specifically of harsh winters, close quarters, and the effect on mental development (by genetic alteration).
100kyr between whites/blacks, plus whites have admixtures blacks do not.
@looncraz ''have higher brain capabilities ( on average ), and large differences in muscular and even skeletal structure ( Africans are more robust due to their survival advantages in Africa ).'' Once again, those two terms are incomparable. It's not like all dark skinned Africans live in similar environments anyway (compare Kenya to Kongo.)
@jaskamakkara Stupid YouTube... 4 month old comment...
Different environments, similar survival needs. Until you get into the frigid environments of Europe (Ice Age) when European/white development separated most from the remainder of the world.
Harsh winters require pre-planning and advanced organizational skills. You need to store dry wood, keep food, stores and organize crops, organize tight-nit communities to keep warm, even if you are just living together in caves. Brains.
''N. Africans are less robust because survival was easier with less natural predators to fend off, those peoples migrated to the rest of the world and evolved. Blacks did not....'' Natural selection occurs even if you do not migrate and fending off predators might have required intelligence over brawn, I mean those who tried to wrestle with lions probably didn't get to pass on their genes.
You must consider what was different about the evolution of whites vs blacks. Blacks are 100% in warm environments. Whites are from environments with harsh winters, and environments which were once frozen most of the year.
This FORCED whites to get along with each other in communities, live in close quarters, develop technology, fight "civilly," conserve body energy (less muscle mass), to think before acting, to favor organization skills and to bolster individuality...
The killing of female babies is mostly an Asian thing due to modern regulations. Historically, the only desire to kill females was to prevent the expense of the wedding in cultures where the bride's family paid for the wedding and also paid dowry. This was overwhelmingly Asian/Indian and African cultures, European culture was less rigid in such cultural norms.
Still, though, that is a symptom of evolution - not a participant thereof...
@mjohanss1975 lol the language you speak and type derives from the original language on earth that we created.. lol.. whites are not in the old testament.... fact but neanderthals are...
@mjohanss1975 Never batted an eyelid... when he said what he said... you are a descendant of a peoples who enslaved my people for well over 400 years, ALL western white countries got rich off the back of my ancestors blood and sweat.. today you are priviledged not because of the merits of your achievements, but only because of the color of your skin.. your race is a foolish people and you'll destroy us and the world if left unchecked.. .. this is why the white world empire will fall very soon.
@WesleySniperS1 As for all your other rants, I won't respond to them at this time. Not only because they didn't contain a shred of evidence but also because you are a person of limited intelligence. So I'm gonna limit myself to one post at the time from now on because that's all I believe you can handle. Especially since you said something about the Old Testament. That was funny hehe
@mjohanss1975 Google white privileged.. learn about yourself.. did you know god told us that he'd put a foolish people, who are not even a people to rule over us... when we fell from world domination... yes.. we did rule the entire earth.. the first 4 world ruler were from CUSH.. pick up a bible
@WesleySniperS1 haha all those messages and all that ranting on not once did you offer even ONE piece of evidence. You offered about as much evidence as a Christians offers when he states that the Bible contains the truth haha....as for enslaving...hmm, you know, not ONE of my ancestors has ever owned a slave. Ever. One of my ancestors, Eryik Skuggja, was however enslaved by black people around 950CE. So in what way do I or my family or my kin own you a god damn thing?
@WesleySniperS1 Your predecessors, the nazi scientists, used pseudo-science to attempt proving that black people were subhumans and the sheeple believed them. Now we got people like you, again using pseudo-science to try to prove that everybody except blacks are subhumans. But you know what? The nazis didn't fool educated people back then. And people like you do not fool educated people now. Educated people know far too much about true scientific findings to ever buy into your pseudo-science.
@WesleySniperS1 Sadly, you are most probably one of those sheeple, part of the uneducated masses who buys into these things. The people that made these theories up fooled you into believing them and you were probably handed a handbook for black nazism that you are now quoting "facts" from. I know that for a fact because with every message you sent, you showed that you have very little knowledge of anything at all. Uneducated people like you will always be easily fooled.
some people want to prove that we all descended from black men...what is the point....the first europeans were white the first African's were black big deal....none of this proves who is the superior race...there is no superior race why does someone always have to try to assert themselves to the top of the races? Nonsense! lets just get on with life on this planet we are all one species...
@alex007919 i know what your saying just cause we all originated from africa dont mean we were all black they fail to realize we were part of one contenant and not the whole land mass had the same climate to assume we were all black...
@alex007919 You have to take it from where this reconstruction took place, Dr.Richard Neave was the creator of this bullshit reconstruction he's a Jew, if this skull was found in Israel it would of had been done with lighter clay. Get it?
@vinegar4yoWound lol then they shud have used white paint on it just to make u feel at ease lmao what wud be the difference then? i dont see any white ppl who look like that...
@smukase btw..do we have any info on that skull, community around, etc? i ask because they found a famous 'archer' remains near Stonehenge (btw, for the guy below asking for 'white' thing before 1800BC..maybe a hint^too..a 'little' before 1800BC, yes too^).. well, that guy apparently came from swiss/germany (granary analysis, etc)..means swiss.germans tribes were in britain then? no..means he travelled a lot already..all that to say; one skeleton doesn't mean a full similar civ around too../
Can someone please show me some evidence of white/caucasian history older than 1800BCE and if there is any, can you please explain why the oldest remains found of a proven caucasian only dates to that time period? Did the remains of older white civalisations get washed away in the great flood or will we find billions of remains of caucasians buried under the polar caps, also why are white people the most genetic recessive of all the other ''Mankind = Kind of Man'' , also where are whites from?
@WesleySniperS1 No remain has ever been found in northern europe that wasn't Caucasian. We have found remains of people going all the way back to stone age and so far, not one single remain has been found that was NOT Caucasian. I have seen the remains of a stone age man with my own eyes that was almost perfectly preserved and I could see for myself that he looked very similar to modern day Europeans. Also, you really should know that the word Caucasian is derived from Caucasus.
@mjohanss1975 Cont: on earth, in fact only BLACK people can be called indigenous to EVERY landmass on the entire planet. Now NEANDERTHALS were originally from Canaan in Nth Africa, but they are NOT from the HOMO GENUS, nor do the pre date the Black Race, Scientist claim 1-4% of ALL non blacks have neanderthal DNA, which makes you hybrid also the interbreeding caused detrimental mutatations (SLC24A5) which scientist now acknowledge caused the arrival on the whiteskin thus race also
@WesleySniperS1 Black people have been proven to not be the original man. Findings by the West African Institute of Archeology in Nigeria proved this as they declared that they had found the oldest negroid skeleton to date. It was at least 9,000 years old and thus older than any found up to that point.
4: Evolution isn't really a theory anymore. There are 3 scientific categories in this realm: Laws, facts and theories. Evolution theory has all but been established as fact now.
@mjohanss1975 it explains why the white race, seems to be fighting against nature (SUN) by suffering numerous life threatning cancers and ailments, the reason for this is because white people lost there FUR, yes white people's hair is 6 ETHER, which is the same as most FUR wearing primates and animals, fact also NO mutation is beneficial, ALL are detrimental, but some scientist like to believe some are NEUTRAL. Now you might believe in the nonsense called ENVIRONMENTAL ADAPTATION (EVOLUTION)
@mjohanss1975 to explain why WHITES are more than 14% genetically recessive to black people or explain the reason for the Caucasian phenotypes, well this is easy to knock on the head as for EVOLUTION to be true, scientist need to find the stage in between QUADRUPEDALISM & BIPEDALISM, they have not and will never, have you never wondered why whites always claimed to be from APES, I could tell you secrets to explain all. Did you know APES are genetically closer to whites than they are to MONKEYS
@mjohanss1975 this is a fact, you may now be feeling upset but all i've told you is true and scientist admit this. The white race is here ONLY by default and came about only when Neanderthals bred with Black Human women, thus creating CRO MAGNON MAN... prove anything i've said is wrong.. plus i'm making a 3d film... that will cause a sensation world wide to explain the truth about neanderthals and where there really from, it will blow your mind.. GOOGLE Them&Us to see what a REAL neanderthal was
also try to check "Strontium isotope evidence of Neanderthal mobility at the site of Lakonis, Greece using laser-ablation PIMMS" (2007), hm, raving Neander greek lovers only, really?... & the many new Neander. teeth discoveries (in south greece -too) - suggesting brand new views too. 'not only in cave' ideas (mobility too); illusion only? please..i don't know if there are really 'Neander. lovers', but i can see apparently 'Neander haters'(!)..too unpleasant new meanings for some old theories?..^
And has anyone bothered to tell you the sample size from which they obtained this 1-4% Neanderthal DNA? How do you know that some people may have more than that? Because they tested a few people they make the grand claim that ALL non Africans have 1-4%. How do you know that some may not have more?
@fungusamogus You can't even spell! nor make a proper sentence or convey a thought in an intellectual manner. Stop insulting the fathers of your species and accept that black Africans were the first modern humans, and as fully modern and intelligent as any one living today.
It's been proven the negritos only arrived 10K yrs ago into south Asia, if anyone would like the article I have it. just give me time to sort through all my saved articles.
That is obviously a mini revolution..against the standard darwinian 'simple' evolution theory wanting that everything came from africa (and directly from chimp initially)..& mixing with Neand., presented as impossible -'another race' dogma..as i see black 'counter racists' were abusing to no end that darwinian theory to explain 'all was from old black mighty civs" (& evil white, euros, arabs, bla stole all from them..& erased traces-!)..i am happy enough with that science new breakthrough.. !
@sunset002007 I was reading an interesting historical observation; the first Europeans who encountered Aborigines thought that they were another species and that it was impossible to mate with them. They were proven wrong with the first attractions. Finally, nothing is linear and darwinism has never been linear, we are constantly evolving and not necesseraly with the same parameters, now the Capitalist Man actually has a great array of selective pressures on him, so the merging is necessary
@makkreol well, u know all those new theories on the NWO 'necessities'...what is 'the merging is necessary' anyway?)..especially if coming from 'darwinians evidences'..i do remember raging darwinists a few decades ago..they were like those people with Aborigines apparently, never admiting different 'neandertalians' could mix..well, as for the Neander. tagged as such, was necessary for the theory: Neand. never were coming FROM africa (as darwinist claim for human mechanical evolution theory..) ..
..Even more interestingly about that new neandertalian DNA thing... EVERYWHERE you have neandertalian DNA traces..whole world. ...the ONLY place you have no neandertalian DNA is in central Africa...so the conclusion is obvious; origin of homo sapiens from africa, but when went out of Africa, overwhelmed neandertalians (much less numerous)..but also somehow merged with (and learnt from) them..to keep DNA fraction. Incidentally, the video title is wrong; first 'europeans' were Neand..long before..
@sunset002007 Well actually it says more on our definition of species than that we mated we are a result of mating with another subspecies. The point is if the offspring were able to have their own offspring then the species is far older and it started prior to the African clade that is our dominant genes. Nobody is black or white , we're all in the Homo Erectus gray area :D
who cares if he is black?? humans migrated out of africa, and some groups didn't keep their pigment when they didn't need it. the first european probably was technically a black man.
Hahaha, could you at least include your sources sir? Please provide details on the origin of the skull before painting it with shit. Were was the skull located? and what time period did it flourish in?
As part of the company responsible for producing this reconstruction, I would like to comment firstly that the skin isn't "too dark" - it's a clay reconstruction so is clay coloured. Secondly, not sure where you got the image from, but it certainly wasn't us - do you have permission to use it?
Btw scruffypair is it you're objective to disprove all any any black achievement and to give the masses the impression that blacks went from mudhuts to slavery and thats all we ever did? Are you jewish btw?
@WesleySniperS1...you are aware that they have found homoerectus in Asia too. We came from homoerectus. We may find homoerectus in Europe also.
There is no proof that the first humans were all from Africa and certainly no proof they were originally black.
IMO, blacks were just last to evolve. That's why they have such uncontrolled emotions and are prone to violence so easily because they are closer to homoerectus.
@WesleySniperS1 no, because we say there are no "races" there is one species and we are all included from the melanin plentiful to the melanin deficient.
When a lot of people think of Neanderthals they think of stupid cavemen. But Neandethals were intellectually and physically supierior than homo sapians. If they did cross breed with homosapians then the hybrids would have they traits of both. Are modern Europeons the decendants of this hybrid?
@king7654321 Yes, however they retain no neanderthal mtDNA , meaning in archaic populations it was the "modern human" female who mated with neanderthal and the offspring raised by her tribe/family. Any neanderthal mother's who mated with modern human males kept her offspring with her tribe/group.
Umm no they weren't. They had smaller EQ, more primitive prefrontal lobe. They were bigger and stronger and native to the continent but Cromagnon man came and wiped them out/out competed them (war, disease, exposure, famine).I severely doubt they were smarter.
@gunninlinguist I just got done watching bbc documentaries on the neanderthal when I wrote that comment. In my opinion, I see it to be correct but I'll need to do further research. Several sources say that most cacausian and asian people have 1-4% neanderthal genes so there may be some inter-species mingling that went on. Here is video for you to watch: watch?v=3LVp4MOh-gc
@king7654321 LIES we were better hunters and had better comunity spirit something that neanderthals didnt have. They wern't stupid but they were not as clever as us. If they were smarter they would have remained and beaten us. They did interbreed yes, but their DNA is only found in very few europeans which would indicate the gene is not very present nor very strong in the current HOMO SAPIENS living in Europe.
@LeonaRulez black LIES too..did u know the mighty Méroé civ (black, southern Egypt, little pyramids..u know it i am sure..black theorists say THEy were the 1st pyramid centers, normal historians say they were late imitations to claim legitimity..so long..)..well..did u know that Méroé first money source was..slavery, provider of black poor guys from the south?..no myth alas, the story of slavery is not what ur dogma wants to tell u, ALAS..insiders traitors, yes, from start..not just 'romans'..((
@king7654321 intellectually superior? ha think not, they in were in Europe for thousands of years and never progressed from stone tools, lived in caves, didn't make any artwork- cave paintings, no noticeable system of trade, and with those muscular arms and all they still used thrusting spears and never developed projectile points, they didn't even master any form of fishing it seems. so where do you get this information about intellectual superiority?
What do black people gain from predating whites in Europe? Why not study real black history in West Africa? Contrary to popular belief West Africa had thriving civilizations contemporary with ancient Greece and China.
we know history dating all the way back to chirst stop trying to fool people anoither lie and you could do the same with taht skull with any colors people idiot
Don't put people down when there are clear examples to dismiss your point of view.
The Neantherthals are alive and well within you.
Delusions of Grandeur. What sense does it make to argue over this anyway. If you find one point of view i can find one that contrast yours. So the argument goes on and on and on. If your a racist pig just say so. Go to the Aryan or Arab sites that hates blacks.
You can join the rest of humanity when your finished being brainwashed.
It amazes me, the number of idiots on this site. Blacks have a low I.Q. Africa is shit. Blacks are slaves. Blah Blah Blah. That's basically what you want to get across to the masses.
Okay I get it we whites are Gods. We have never been enslaved before. Nor did we enslave each other. We've always been literate. We never copied anything from any other race. We just magically woke up one day, and said " I'm going to conquer and educate this world." Yes sir. We are Gods.***
meaning, homo-sapiens could not produce offspring with them.
Actually that POV has been quietly ditched by Svante Paabo, leading geneticist in charge of comparing Neanderthal and Human genomes. He has said they probably did produce offspring
@wetweasel56 if this was true, then how come after milloions of years no one has? Im shure by noe some one would have matted with a monkey, if it was really possible it would have happened already. People have sex with animals even in this day and age so if it was possible there would be half humins half monkeys all over the place.
@wetweasel56 Oh.... How do you know? has there been any documented proof? Or even just a story? I think they should mikes chinmp and human DNA together... you know like how they make clones!
I just think it's the COOLEST! Idea.... Half human, half chimp............................
@wetweasel56 Cool!... but look what scruffypair says, he says: Actually that POV has been quietly ditched by Svante Paabo, leading geneticist in charge of comparing Neanderthal and Human genomes. He has said they probably did produce offspring
@wetweasel56 Ahhh. You don't really understand DNA. Got it. Time to move on. Arguing with an ignoramus takes far, far too much effort, and with little or no chance of penetration. Sufficed to say that you and your sexual partner share DNA commonalities but having a baby together isn't really inbreeding. Or maybe it is....
@MichaelnChristine....all you are doing is writing at length to inject insult toward me and no other explanations. That's a true sign of someone that has failed.
If we share a pattern of DNA sequencing that is similar to a Neanderthal that is not saying we are from them or that we mated with them. We are all human species and we are going to have similar DNA patterns to a point.
But back to the original point. Nothing has proven the first Euros were black. They may have carried a black skull.
@wetweasel56 Oh it's a racial thing....wow you are a pathetic little fool aren't you. Please stop posting on the Internet. Maybe go to your Tea Party meeting, or a prayer group....pathetic.
@Philofor21 loool mate real the old bible u ll understand what ur parents re hiding from u hahahahahahah, u ll understand who re the devil dear heheheheheh, do u ever ask urself why did they change what was in the bible? and why white people dont ve cuture i mean proper culture, and tradition like other race?
Tychaification 2 months ago
Black Power!!!!
snigr 2 months ago
ps looncraz, Dummy, Les Paul, a white guy, invented the electric guitar, ok? The only thing you ever invented was a lie! I've seen that so-called list of black inventors, which is totally bogus, except for the part about peanut butter.
Wanda7771 3 months ago
@Wanda7771 you must be a twelve yr old.the guitar comes before electricity asswipeniod.start with the banjo and you'll be on the right track.NOT THE ELECTRIC BANJO NETHERLANDERER!!the rehhhhhhguhluh one dumbass.
ohmphthschwrhu 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All this Race and IQ stuff is lies and racist propaganda actual scientists even said that it doesn't matter what race you are!. I know this is true because I am smarter then lots of White people my age, trust me.
LOhaha94 4 months ago
Comment removed
LOhaha94 4 months ago
humans have always being humans, these monkey skeletons are just that, monkeys. we don't give birth to monkeys or monkeys give birth to humans. no amount of time changes our basic structure. God made us just the way we are.
cuzcatlan36 5 months ago
The first eauropeans were African people who left Africa. The funny thing is the bible speaks of human history. Adam and Eve had twins called cain and abel.One kill the other and was banished out of Africa. That child that was banished out of africa mated with neandrthals, and that is how the other races came to be. Every race originated from the African race. Why is it that every race out of Africa has neanderthat genes? Africa is the original race. That face is pure Afric, but racis wont like
Zarasha1 6 months ago
@Zarasha1 you dont know your facts thats not true at all.
frenchhy 5 months ago
@vinegar4yoWound
look it is what it is and there is no changing the truth even for those who does not want to face the truth. i am not proud of my white ancestory but unfortunately i have to live that and so do u.
livinglife2thefulle1 6 months ago
This isn't correct, but it isn't far off. N. Africans during the time were much lighter with smaller noses and those are the ones who migrated into Europe.
They looked more like modern Indians than modern blacks.
Then again, pigment can change pretty quickly, as can soft structures... so this individual could be accurately reconstructed, but it is not representative of the earliest Europeans.
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz garbage.
ohmphthschwrhu 2 months ago
@ohmphthschwrhu What, precisely, is garbage?
looncraz 2 months ago
At the very least, the bridge of his/her nose should be higher. But if that's how early Europeans looked, I'm not going to get all butthurt about it. I only hope they're not just being PC.
TheGentlemanGhoul 6 months ago
MOFO'S CAN'T EXCEPT THAT AFRICAN PEOPLE WERE THE FIRST PEOPLE ON EARTH AND THE TRUE BIRTH OF CIVILIZATION. YOU CAN MAKE FUN DOESN'T MATTER FACT'S OR FACT'S. PICKUP A BOOKDO RESERCH THEN YOU CAN FIND THE TRUTH. DON'T DEPEND ON PREJUDICE!!!1
mrkeepit100ify 6 months ago
@mrkeepit100ify
The real problem is that it wasn't the dark-skinned Africans that migrated, it was the lighter skinned ones ( from North Africa ). The pigment in the video is wrong, and the soft-tissue part of the nose is wrong.
looncraz 6 months ago
That's funny. Dark brown skin and African facial features added to a Caucasian skull. And it is a white man's skull, evidenced by several features, including the squarish eye sockets and triangular nasal openings. No wonder the thing looks like a freak!! I am laughing my white ass off!!
gvman3670 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gvman3670 Dis is realism u foolz! even maself asa (Wog) agrees ive done ma reserch eruos derive off africans exsept it ... n i love it ;p
magicthunder666 6 months ago
Dis is realism u foolz! even maself asa (Wog) agrees ive done ma reserch eruos derive off africans exsept it ... n i love it ;p
YaBudala 8 months ago
xD HAHAHAHHAHA!!!!
SaraCHAX 8 months ago 4
Well, they do say Africa was the cradle of civilization/ humanity. Point is that Caucasians today obviously look different from subcontinental Africans, not to mention other races look different from Africans as well. We should realize that our origins are similar and stop racism.
MagicalWheelies 9 months ago
@MagicalWheelies
No the cradle of civilization was Mesopotamia( modern day Iraq). But the origin of humanity was Africa, it's just that civilization didn't arise until much later.
NorthCitySider 9 months ago
@NorthCitySider I'll buy that.
MagicalWheelies 9 months ago
The nose is not correct!
ludikriticar 9 months ago
@ludikriticar Yes it is correct, your head is not correct.
MrSivram28 9 months ago
I'd agree with that broadly, but I think that the reconstruction was ideologically inspired. Ideology is within the realm of politics, and in political (and not strictly scientific) terms, Europeans are a distinct etho-cultural group, in their own right, irrespective of close racial ties with Persian and Indians. I think the Semites are not strictly European however.
Vot63 9 months ago
@Vot63 Well nobody said that Semites were Europeans. Only that they are Caucasians. A European is always a Caucasian but a Caucasian is not always a European. Europeans are only one branch of a much larger family tree. In Europe, we don't feel racial kinship though. Only cultural. My own country considers itself connected to three or four other countries but feels very little kinship with others, simply because only those 3 or 4 countries have similar culture.
mjohanss1975 9 months ago
@Vot63 Don't forget to add my name next time. You've forgotten to add my name in your replies to me a couple of times. That's pretty much like wanting to talk to a person on the phone but forgetting to dial the number hehe
mjohanss1975 9 months ago
@Vot63 An example of kinship through culture would be the following: My country is a Western country. So we feel some kinship with ALL western countries. We share some common traits and beliefs. An african-american is western so we will feel some kinship with him despite him being a completely different race. Russians are of the same race as us but we feel VERY little kinship with them. They are much more foreign to us than the very foreign looking African-Americans.
mjohanss1975 9 months ago
I'm not convinced that there is evidence for the claim that modern San resemble the first Kenyan human skeleton.
You say that the earliest negro skeleton is 9,000 years old. I understand that the human population traveled to and proliferated in Asia, and returned to Europe and Africa in large numbers about 10,000 years ago. I'd say the evidence does indicate that the European and Black races are modern races, so I don't dispute your facts in that area.
Vot63 10 months ago
@Vot63 Modern races both, the European and Congoid (for lack of a better word; black gets to confusing). But so are the mongoloid race though. None of the races that exists today existed back then. Mankind had an entirely different make-up of races that we know nothing of today. From everything that I've read though, the San is the only people that resembles what we once all used to look like because they look like the humans from the time before mankind left the African continent.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@Vot63 One thing I would like to add though; I don't really prescribe to Europeans being a race. Yes, we belong to a race but we belong to the same race as all other peoples who can trace their origins to the Caucasus, like Arabs, certain Afghan peoples, certain Indian peoples, Persians etc.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
No remains found in europe are Caucasian or have (erroneous deceiving) caucasoid phenotypes, none and GRIMALDI MAN (negroid) who is deemed modern anatomically pre dates all other humans in europe, fact there have been a few Caucasian mummies found in china called the Tarmarin mummies which ARE the oldests caucasians (1800bce) Johann F Blumenbach coined the word Caucasian, he claimed after the most beutiful whites, but thats NOT the real reason, the Caucasian Man is not indigenous to NO landmass
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
There is a slit in the nose cavity thats synonymous with Caucasians and blacks don't have it so this whole video is bogus.
PupuTheClown 10 months ago
@PupuTheClown why is it so surprising that the very first europeans would be darker in skin and with tropical features such as a broad nose and thicker lips? After all, when we first came to europe we were not that long out of africa so we could very possibly still have tropical features.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 But here's what cracks me up... do you realise that CAUCASOID phenotypes existed BEFORE the arrival of CAUCASIANS, fact also. Scientist have now deemed ''RACE'' as a social misconstruct, why because they know that anyone with half a brain would realise that there is only 1 race of Man on the planet and he's black, genetic mutations occur in ALL non blacks, fact and technically you CANNOT call non blacks full human, but hybrids
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 oh damn...you're one of those people. That was some of the most unscientific hogwash that has ever been uttered. Do you know why people like you go on Youtube and say the things you do? Because there are no censors of any kind here. All morons are welcome to say whatever dumb thing they can think of. You are a sad, pathetic little person. I bet you're the kind of person that didn't even flinch when Kamau Kambon said the things he said.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 lol before you start foaming around the mouth.. prove me wrong... you came up with the San people nonsense like thats credible... lol... and it explains the white race's arrival... my friend I could really teach you about how and when you came along... but I know it'll alter your world view forever... yes and what Kamau Kambon said is correct, do you know genocide appears in the bible, guess what... it's your race, go check it out... you ppl are here by default my friend..
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 If you want evidence, there is mountains upon mountains of evidence that supports my views. You are the one with a theory that differ from everything that has even been written so the onus is on you to provide evidence. So far you have provided none. If I say that the moon is made of cheese and you disagree is it then on you to provide evidence? No, it would be on me because what I said goes against everything that has even been documented. So prove your "moon-cheese" theory.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 You will have to prove yourself much more intelligent anf far more educated than that fool Kambon if you wish to have any hope of proving anything though. Seeing how you agree with what he had to say, I highly doubt you will be able though. The only one who will follow a fool is an even bigger fool.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 Here is where you theories completely fall apart, however:
1: Cro Magnon man existed long before they entered Europe and met Neanderthal man. Thus, it is impossible for Cro Magnon man to be the offspring of black women and neanderthal men as you claim.
2: The scientific name for neanderthal man is Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis and they were every bit a part of the Homo genus as you or I. Only a member of the Homo genus can have reproductive offspring with another Homo.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 5: You are an African American. As such, almost ALL of your non-european DNA comes from West Africa. You claim Caucasians aren't indigenous to any landmass. Untrue. But your own ancestors are indigenous to West Africa ONLY. There were no Bantu-speaking peoples anywhere south of W Africa but as they exterminated all the indigenous San, they established themselves as indigenous all the way to the Cape. This, also, is an established fact.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 WTF... are you on about.. leave black origins to black people... my ancestors were North East African... i'm shemitic by blood.. proven.. who the fcuk is bantu... were they the first africans or was they the first race of blacks you fool... most so called africans... are shemitic...there is only 4 races of africans... its a fact.. Johann Blumenbach coined the 3 races... Africa NEVER had borders until whites came along... blacks not only lived in africa..
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 blacks were the original ppl's of IRAN, EYGPT,YEMEN, MOROCCO,IRAQ, SAUDI ARABIA, AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN, that was all part of the ethiopian kingdom.. ruled by the king of Axum... the ancient egyptians had colonys in the now so called middle east, which was given that name by a british general.. after the suez was created to seperate the middle east (north east africa) from the african continent.. but whats it the middle of?... lol.. name me 1 landmass where whites are indigenous too
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 Arabs only arrived in north east africa in the 6th century AD.. (ottoman turk islamic invasion) the Medes (todays iranians) were the first asians to come into north east africa, they are not arabs. Name me the country of indigenous white people, bere in mind though the oldest found remains of a PROVEN caucasian was found in 1800BCE in CHINA.. but only a few bodies
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 lol gone are the days when newly arrived whites on the planet.. will tell us blacks who were here from the begining and created by NO other race but god alone, you whites love to alter history and come up with mad THEORYS to make you feel like you really belong here on earth lol... like we don't know our own histories.. lol... we know the entire earths history my friend..
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 '' lol gone are the days when newly arrived whites on the planet.. will tell us blacks who were here from the begining and created by NO other race but god alone'' So you think white people are aliens?
jaskamakkara 7 months ago
@jaskamakkara
No such thing as god, and you have to remember that whites are more evolved than blacks ( due to environmental challenges ), have higher brain capabilities ( on average ), and large differences in muscular and even skeletal structure ( Africans are more robust due to their survival advantages in Africa ).
N. Africans are less robust because survival was easier with less natural predators to fend off, those peoples migrated to the rest of the world and evolved. Blacks did not....
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz ''No such thing as god, and you have to remember that whites are more evolved than blacks'' Your entire concept is wrong, to be ''less evolved'' evolution would have to stop, but it doesn't. Also Black people is a much broader term than white people so you simply can not squeeze them into one category.
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara
Evolution is "needs-derived." Blacks have had less need to evolve away from their state for many reasons, namely environment.
Blacks have failed continually to thrive in creating large society as they have had no reason to develop those skills and to favor related genes. Blacks will punch when scared, whites will normally try to evaluate the situation. This is fight/flight response due to evolutionary pressures. Whites had to work together, blacks have more of a pack mentality.
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz You say in your channel that you search for the truth when it sounds a bit like you're trying to create one for yourself, and do not listen even if anyone has a valid argument. First of all ''civilization'' is only below
10 000 years in human evolution (even less in Europe), which is quite a short time in context. That's why it probably hasn't had time to drastically change us. And also there were west African kingdoms by the time the American slave trade started.
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara
Humans evolve rapidly, but grouping has occurred for likely a solid 100,000 years or more, even Neanderthals lived in communities 40ka. Civilization, as we know it, is a product of farming. Nomadic tribes were common before. The harsher the environment, the greater the need for cooperation, and cold is the harshness that requires pre-planning and organization.
Blacks are not any more diverse than whites, the line between them isn't clean anyway... Self-ID'd blacks score lower.
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz ''Blacks are not any more diverse than whites'' If you by black mean dark skinned African they sure as hell are. ''and cold is the harshness that requires pre-planning and organization.'' I don't see why. ''(this is a trait of Nordics, BTW)'' Another unscientific ''fact'' there is no Nordic race.
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara
There is no greater diversity in one group than the other by pure skin color alone. Indeed, where one calls someone white or black is not even universally determined, and there are more mutts than anything.
Cold FORCES people TOGETHER for warmth, shelter, supplies, and defense. In a warm environment the only such motivator is water, but it is a poor comparison.
Nordics are a sub-race of whites, if you want to call them that. The white race is filled with internal divisions...
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz ''There is no greater diversity in one group than the other by pure skin color alone.'' According to the current belief all humans originate from Africa, that's why you can't compare Africans to Europeans. That's why there are Pygmyes averaging at 150cm and Masai at 190cm both in Africa. ''Indeed, where one calls someone white or black is not even universally determined, and there are more mutts than anything.'' And yet you use the term. How do you define it?
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara
You can, certainly, compare Africans to Europeans. I define black as being greater than 2/3ds black african ( tribal African, whatever).
However, most studies use self-reporting. Normally people who are as little as 30% "black" will identify themselves as such in the U.S.. Considering their IQs average 85 in the U.S. shows an IMPROVEMENT by the European gene infusion and culture. Black Africans average IQ is 70 in Africa.
However, genetically, it is Euros vs middle Africans.
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz You choose convenience over knowledge, suit yourself.
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara I'd wager my knowledge dwarfs yours on most any topic.
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz so most blacks actually are retards??
frenchhy 5 months ago
@frenchhy Pretty close to it, yes. Factually, provably.
80% of whites have an I.Q. higher than the average black person(85), 20% of black have a higher I.Q. than the white average (100) - in the United States.
The black African I.Q. **AVERAGE** is a VERY low 70 - which should explain why Africa is so messed up...
looncraz 5 months ago
@looncraz You do realize I.Q. tests weren't made to for other cultures. The questions on the tests come from common things a person should know. How can you tell someone what they should know. Its funny how white people really think they are so smart.
sambam2694 5 months ago
@sambam2694
The I.Q. tests in question or international culture-agnostic tests.
Further, considering the black AMERICAN I.Q. is 15% lower than the white AMERICAN I.Q. is damning evidence.
That and the actual CAUSE is known and verified through GENETICS...
You can't fake DNA and physical differences between the "races."
Africans didn't have the same fight for survival as other races and were barely sociable, so I.Q. is expected to be lower. Evolution lifted whites/Asians and skipped blacks.
looncraz 5 months ago 3
@looncraz Your joking right, the barbaric Anglo Saxons didn't even know how to write. When they visited Africa and the Middle East they picked up on different literate techniques. So how is it possible that white people, and of all races white people could be smarter.
sambam2694 5 months ago
@sambam2694 Never said whites were the smartest. Jews, technically, are the smartest (oh... wait... they're essentially white in your eyes...).
You are also very much incorrect, most white cultures had some form of written language, however, due to massive cultural diversity and cross-pollination, the languages evolved too rapidly for us to nail down any kind of winner. Besides, human evolution goes back MUCH longer than writing...
Africans had less need to cooperate than whites/Asians/Jews.
looncraz 5 months ago
@sambam2694 Actually Ashkenazi Jews have the highest IQs on average at 110. But they're an ethnic group, not a race. East Asians (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese) have the highest as a "race" at 105. Whites are at 100. Hispanics and Native Americans are in the low-mid 90s. African Americans are at 85. However, 95% of African Americans have white blood--about 25% on average. So if IQ and race are truly linked, this could be a factor why they score higher than black Africans, who average 70.
takfam07 5 months ago
@looncraz Hey son. Do you know that Timbuktu(On Black Africa) had more books than all
libraries on Europe TOGETHER? The AFRICAN Iron Age came first than European?
The Nok Civilisation(NIGERIA) was made when germans were tribes yet ?
Just study son ... I.Q. Test was commissioned by zionist jews. That's why they are on the top of "hierarchy" .
joahxxx 4 months ago
@joahxxx This good old tripe again...
One need only look at what the respective races have accomplished over the course of history to determine "worthiness."
There are many different versions of I.Q. tests = they do favor socialized people, however even when blacks are raised in a white family as equals they fall behind the curve, there is no denying that!
Blacks have their own strengths, it just happens that grounded logic is not one of them.
looncraz 4 months ago
@looncraz ..i will tell you this,, Looney tunes..lol..Go build the pyramids and then perhaps we can talk..or even a gas mask, but wait, what about the air condition.. and even more, the elevators..oops!,, cant for get the traffic light and still there's the Almanac,, oh my God! the electric Guitar..'play that funky music white boy'..yeah! lmbo here..Look Donald Duck...The I.Q test isnt based on Race silly..its a conspiracy to keeps blacks illiterate in america. proven after slavery..FACT..shhh.
meshakaa 4 months ago
@meshakaa
Just because some popular/creative inventions were made by blacks proves nothing...
Show me the black-run country that does well on the world stage...
There is NO conspiracy, blacks have problems in EVERY country they are in - ESPECIALLY in the ones in which they are the dominate race!
looncraz 4 months ago
@looncraz Africans didnt have the same fight for survival? Then please Explain to me why Africans Were immune to european diseases Whereas native-americans and aboriginals were not? also explain to me why the first european explorers to visit africa died in flocks? There were even parts of Africa (the Congo rainforest for example) That were so hostile they were known as the whitemans hell yet africans managed to survive there for thousands of years?
312CLIQ 2 months ago
@312CLIQ Where to begin...
1. Africans had similar survival fights, epidemiologically, this is not to which I speak, I speak of social development as pertinent to evolutionary 'favoritism' resulting in a higher reliance on intellectual reasoning as individuals and as a whole.
2. Recent African emigrants would likely be those with the higher IQs - they were smart enough to leave Africa, after-all. Not to mention high U.S. standards of immigration.
3. Blacks are sub-par every-where...
looncraz 2 months ago
@looncraz Also Explain why Recent African Immigrants (nigerian-americans for example) score higher on IQ test then US born whites?
You are just using pseudo-science to justify you're own racists believes and rather then looking for external/Cultural reasons as to why the IQ test migth be lower for Black americans such as poverty and the fact that most Black-americans living in the inner city grow up in single parent homes and often are not stimulated to learn or get educated.
312CLIQ 2 months ago
@sambam2694 IQ test cultural bias was a HUGE 20th century concern, as data consistently showed that blacks routinely scored lower than whites. So by the 1960s, IQ tests were drawn up as culture-free as possible. Google IQ tests for samples. But blacks continue to score lowest even on word-free tests like Raven's Matrices, etc. Even Eskimos score higher IQ than blacks, though their culture is radically non-Western. Blacks officially score lowest on every intelligence test yet administered.
takfam07 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@frenchhy Pretty close to it, yes. Factually, provably.
80% of whites have an I.Q. higher than the average black person(85), 20% of black have a higher I.Q. than the white average (100) - in the United States.
The black African I.Q. **AVERAGE** is a VERY low 70 - which should explain why Africa is so messed up...
looncraz 5 months ago
@jaskamakkara yes there is. so your telling me a Norwegian is the same as a German?? just look at the facial structure alone.
frenchhy 5 months ago
@frenchhy That's a horrible example.
jaskamakkara 5 months ago
@looncraz part 2
And much before. I can not stress the fact enough that you can not speak of black people as a race in the same manner as white people. It would be like calling all people outside of Africa + northern Africa the same race. The genetic variation is much greater there then anywhere else. As i recall hearing, animals that migrate from warm climates to cold don't tend to evolve less muscle mass but instead shorter limbs, and more compact limbs actually = more strength in theory.
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara (part 2)
Human evolution is marred by our brains. Instead of growing our bodies shorter and stouter (this is a trait of Nordics, BTW), we innovated and kept ourselves warm in other ways (furs). Also, such changes take longer than the time when we survived the extreme cold environments - I'm speaking specifically of harsh winters, close quarters, and the effect on mental development (by genetic alteration).
100kyr between whites/blacks, plus whites have admixtures blacks do not.
looncraz 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@looncraz ''have higher brain capabilities ( on average ), and large differences in muscular and even skeletal structure ( Africans are more robust due to their survival advantages in Africa ).'' Once again, those two terms are incomparable. It's not like all dark skinned Africans live in similar environments anyway (compare Kenya to Kongo.)
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara Stupid YouTube... 4 month old comment...
Different environments, similar survival needs. Until you get into the frigid environments of Europe (Ice Age) when European/white development separated most from the remainder of the world.
Harsh winters require pre-planning and advanced organizational skills. You need to store dry wood, keep food, stores and organize crops, organize tight-nit communities to keep warm, even if you are just living together in caves. Brains.
looncraz 2 months ago
''N. Africans are less robust because survival was easier with less natural predators to fend off, those peoples migrated to the rest of the world and evolved. Blacks did not....'' Natural selection occurs even if you do not migrate and fending off predators might have required intelligence over brawn, I mean those who tried to wrestle with lions probably didn't get to pass on their genes.
jaskamakkara 6 months ago
@jaskamakkara (part 2)
You must consider what was different about the evolution of whites vs blacks. Blacks are 100% in warm environments. Whites are from environments with harsh winters, and environments which were once frozen most of the year.
This FORCED whites to get along with each other in communities, live in close quarters, develop technology, fight "civilly," conserve body energy (less muscle mass), to think before acting, to favor organization skills and to bolster individuality...
looncraz 6 months ago
@looncraz and kill female babies to survive,huh.patrick
ohmphthschwrhu 2 months ago
@ohmphthschwrhu WTF you talking about??
The killing of female babies is mostly an Asian thing due to modern regulations. Historically, the only desire to kill females was to prevent the expense of the wedding in cultures where the bride's family paid for the wedding and also paid dowry. This was overwhelmingly Asian/Indian and African cultures, European culture was less rigid in such cultural norms.
Still, though, that is a symptom of evolution - not a participant thereof...
looncraz 2 months ago
@mjohanss1975 lol the language you speak and type derives from the original language on earth that we created.. lol.. whites are not in the old testament.... fact but neanderthals are...
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 Never batted an eyelid... when he said what he said... you are a descendant of a peoples who enslaved my people for well over 400 years, ALL western white countries got rich off the back of my ancestors blood and sweat.. today you are priviledged not because of the merits of your achievements, but only because of the color of your skin.. your race is a foolish people and you'll destroy us and the world if left unchecked.. .. this is why the white world empire will fall very soon.
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 As for all your other rants, I won't respond to them at this time. Not only because they didn't contain a shred of evidence but also because you are a person of limited intelligence. So I'm gonna limit myself to one post at the time from now on because that's all I believe you can handle. Especially since you said something about the Old Testament. That was funny hehe
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1
Whites BOUGHT slaves from Africa... mostly from Africans.
We have the records that prove it! They were either slaves of the tribes, prisoners of war, or were simply prisoners...
looncraz 6 months ago
@mjohanss1975 Google white privileged.. learn about yourself.. did you know god told us that he'd put a foolish people, who are not even a people to rule over us... when we fell from world domination... yes.. we did rule the entire earth.. the first 4 world ruler were from CUSH.. pick up a bible
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 haha all those messages and all that ranting on not once did you offer even ONE piece of evidence. You offered about as much evidence as a Christians offers when he states that the Bible contains the truth haha....as for enslaving...hmm, you know, not ONE of my ancestors has ever owned a slave. Ever. One of my ancestors, Eryik Skuggja, was however enslaved by black people around 950CE. So in what way do I or my family or my kin own you a god damn thing?
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 Your predecessors, the nazi scientists, used pseudo-science to attempt proving that black people were subhumans and the sheeple believed them. Now we got people like you, again using pseudo-science to try to prove that everybody except blacks are subhumans. But you know what? The nazis didn't fool educated people back then. And people like you do not fool educated people now. Educated people know far too much about true scientific findings to ever buy into your pseudo-science.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 Sadly, you are most probably one of those sheeple, part of the uneducated masses who buys into these things. The people that made these theories up fooled you into believing them and you were probably handed a handbook for black nazism that you are now quoting "facts" from. I know that for a fact because with every message you sent, you showed that you have very little knowledge of anything at all. Uneducated people like you will always be easily fooled.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
some people want to prove that we all descended from black men...what is the point....the first europeans were white the first African's were black big deal....none of this proves who is the superior race...there is no superior race why does someone always have to try to assert themselves to the top of the races? Nonsense! lets just get on with life on this planet we are all one species...
lucy9359 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
just monkeys, not humans
cuzcatlan36 11 months ago
how do you know his colour was black just by his skull?(just curiosity and plz dont start telling that i am racist or anything like that)
alex007919 11 months ago
@alex007919 i know what your saying just cause we all originated from africa dont mean we were all black they fail to realize we were part of one contenant and not the whole land mass had the same climate to assume we were all black...
Cuauhtli47 10 months ago
@alex007919 You have to take it from where this reconstruction took place, Dr.Richard Neave was the creator of this bullshit reconstruction he's a Jew, if this skull was found in Israel it would of had been done with lighter clay. Get it?
GundisalusMenendiz 10 months ago
@vinegar4yoWound lol then they shud have used white paint on it just to make u feel at ease lmao what wud be the difference then? i dont see any white ppl who look like that...
smukase 11 months ago
@smukase btw..do we have any info on that skull, community around, etc? i ask because they found a famous 'archer' remains near Stonehenge (btw, for the guy below asking for 'white' thing before 1800BC..maybe a hint^too..a 'little' before 1800BC, yes too^).. well, that guy apparently came from swiss/germany (granary analysis, etc)..means swiss.germans tribes were in britain then? no..means he travelled a lot already..all that to say; one skeleton doesn't mean a full similar civ around too../
sunset002007 10 months ago
@sunset002007 lol here we go again...
smukase 10 months ago
Can someone please show me some evidence of white/caucasian history older than 1800BCE and if there is any, can you please explain why the oldest remains found of a proven caucasian only dates to that time period? Did the remains of older white civalisations get washed away in the great flood or will we find billions of remains of caucasians buried under the polar caps, also why are white people the most genetic recessive of all the other ''Mankind = Kind of Man'' , also where are whites from?
WesleySniperS1 1 year ago
@WesleySniperS1 No remain has ever been found in northern europe that wasn't Caucasian. We have found remains of people going all the way back to stone age and so far, not one single remain has been found that was NOT Caucasian. I have seen the remains of a stone age man with my own eyes that was almost perfectly preserved and I could see for myself that he looked very similar to modern day Europeans. Also, you really should know that the word Caucasian is derived from Caucasus.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 Cont: on earth, in fact only BLACK people can be called indigenous to EVERY landmass on the entire planet. Now NEANDERTHALS were originally from Canaan in Nth Africa, but they are NOT from the HOMO GENUS, nor do the pre date the Black Race, Scientist claim 1-4% of ALL non blacks have neanderthal DNA, which makes you hybrid also the interbreeding caused detrimental mutatations (SLC24A5) which scientist now acknowledge caused the arrival on the whiteskin thus race also
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@WesleySniperS1 Black people have been proven to not be the original man. Findings by the West African Institute of Archeology in Nigeria proved this as they declared that they had found the oldest negroid skeleton to date. It was at least 9,000 years old and thus older than any found up to that point.
4: Evolution isn't really a theory anymore. There are 3 scientific categories in this realm: Laws, facts and theories. Evolution theory has all but been established as fact now.
mjohanss1975 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 it explains why the white race, seems to be fighting against nature (SUN) by suffering numerous life threatning cancers and ailments, the reason for this is because white people lost there FUR, yes white people's hair is 6 ETHER, which is the same as most FUR wearing primates and animals, fact also NO mutation is beneficial, ALL are detrimental, but some scientist like to believe some are NEUTRAL. Now you might believe in the nonsense called ENVIRONMENTAL ADAPTATION (EVOLUTION)
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 to explain why WHITES are more than 14% genetically recessive to black people or explain the reason for the Caucasian phenotypes, well this is easy to knock on the head as for EVOLUTION to be true, scientist need to find the stage in between QUADRUPEDALISM & BIPEDALISM, they have not and will never, have you never wondered why whites always claimed to be from APES, I could tell you secrets to explain all. Did you know APES are genetically closer to whites than they are to MONKEYS
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
@mjohanss1975 this is a fact, you may now be feeling upset but all i've told you is true and scientist admit this. The white race is here ONLY by default and came about only when Neanderthals bred with Black Human women, thus creating CRO MAGNON MAN... prove anything i've said is wrong.. plus i'm making a 3d film... that will cause a sensation world wide to explain the truth about neanderthals and where there really from, it will blow your mind.. GOOGLE Them&Us to see what a REAL neanderthal was
WesleySniperS1 10 months ago
wrong the neanderthal gene only exsist in non african races so sorry ,european(hunter gatherer)funny part here
solomontosalassie 1 year ago
also try to check "Strontium isotope evidence of Neanderthal mobility at the site of Lakonis, Greece using laser-ablation PIMMS" (2007), hm, raving Neander greek lovers only, really?... & the many new Neander. teeth discoveries (in south greece -too) - suggesting brand new views too. 'not only in cave' ideas (mobility too); illusion only? please..i don't know if there are really 'Neander. lovers', but i can see apparently 'Neander haters'(!)..too unpleasant new meanings for some old theories?..^
sunset002007 1 year ago
And has anyone bothered to tell you the sample size from which they obtained this 1-4% Neanderthal DNA? How do you know that some people may have more than that? Because they tested a few people they make the grand claim that ALL non Africans have 1-4%. How do you know that some may not have more?
c1zx 1 year ago
@fungusamogus You can't even spell! nor make a proper sentence or convey a thought in an intellectual manner. Stop insulting the fathers of your species and accept that black Africans were the first modern humans, and as fully modern and intelligent as any one living today.
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
This is fucking disgusting. An ugly nigger.
MiracleKD18 1 year ago
It's been proven the negritos only arrived 10K yrs ago into south Asia, if anyone would like the article I have it. just give me time to sort through all my saved articles.
GundisalusMenendiz 1 year ago
That is obviously a mini revolution..against the standard darwinian 'simple' evolution theory wanting that everything came from africa (and directly from chimp initially)..& mixing with Neand., presented as impossible -'another race' dogma..as i see black 'counter racists' were abusing to no end that darwinian theory to explain 'all was from old black mighty civs" (& evil white, euros, arabs, bla stole all from them..& erased traces-!)..i am happy enough with that science new breakthrough.. !
sunset002007 1 year ago
@sunset002007 I was reading an interesting historical observation; the first Europeans who encountered Aborigines thought that they were another species and that it was impossible to mate with them. They were proven wrong with the first attractions. Finally, nothing is linear and darwinism has never been linear, we are constantly evolving and not necesseraly with the same parameters, now the Capitalist Man actually has a great array of selective pressures on him, so the merging is necessary
makkreol 1 year ago
@makkreol well, u know all those new theories on the NWO 'necessities'...what is 'the merging is necessary' anyway?)..especially if coming from 'darwinians evidences'..i do remember raging darwinists a few decades ago..they were like those people with Aborigines apparently, never admiting different 'neandertalians' could mix..well, as for the Neander. tagged as such, was necessary for the theory: Neand. never were coming FROM africa (as darwinist claim for human mechanical evolution theory..) ..
sunset002007 1 year ago
..Even more interestingly about that new neandertalian DNA thing... EVERYWHERE you have neandertalian DNA traces..whole world. ...the ONLY place you have no neandertalian DNA is in central Africa...so the conclusion is obvious; origin of homo sapiens from africa, but when went out of Africa, overwhelmed neandertalians (much less numerous)..but also somehow merged with (and learnt from) them..to keep DNA fraction. Incidentally, the video title is wrong; first 'europeans' were Neand..long before..
sunset002007 1 year ago
@sunset002007 Well actually it says more on our definition of species than that we mated we are a result of mating with another subspecies. The point is if the offspring were able to have their own offspring then the species is far older and it started prior to the African clade that is our dominant genes. Nobody is black or white , we're all in the Homo Erectus gray area :D
makkreol 1 year ago
who cares if he is black?? humans migrated out of africa, and some groups didn't keep their pigment when they didn't need it. the first european probably was technically a black man.
Wesleyfromindy2 1 year ago
Hahaha, could you at least include your sources sir? Please provide details on the origin of the skull before painting it with shit. Were was the skull located? and what time period did it flourish in?
SagginWillies 1 year ago
oh he's black interesting
808758 1 year ago
All u race debaters are lost and a waste to the Human species.
osiruskat 1 year ago 8
As part of the company responsible for producing this reconstruction, I would like to comment firstly that the skin isn't "too dark" - it's a clay reconstruction so is clay coloured. Secondly, not sure where you got the image from, but it certainly wasn't us - do you have permission to use it?
gazbos 1 year ago
Btw scruffypair is it you're objective to disprove all any any black achievement and to give the masses the impression that blacks went from mudhuts to slavery and thats all we ever did? Are you jewish btw?
WesleySniperS1 1 year ago
Questions:
Did caucasoid features exist before or after the arrival of caucasians?
What is the oldest remains found of a caucasian person, not a caucasoid but caucasian?
Where are caucasians indigenous too?
Were the ancient egyptians hybrid humans (neandertal) if not what were they?
Have all white people ever born been part neandertal?
Why would the first europeans be non black, what would they have been?
Is it not true to say that there is only 1 true race on earth, black people?
WesleySniperS1 1 year ago 2
@WesleySniperS1...you are aware that they have found homoerectus in Asia too. We came from homoerectus. We may find homoerectus in Europe also.
There is no proof that the first humans were all from Africa and certainly no proof they were originally black.
IMO, blacks were just last to evolve. That's why they have such uncontrolled emotions and are prone to violence so easily because they are closer to homoerectus.
wetweasel56 1 year ago
@WesleySniperS1 no, because we say there are no "races" there is one species and we are all included from the melanin plentiful to the melanin deficient.
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
When a lot of people think of Neanderthals they think of stupid cavemen. But Neandethals were intellectually and physically supierior than homo sapians. If they did cross breed with homosapians then the hybrids would have they traits of both. Are modern Europeons the decendants of this hybrid?
king7654321 1 year ago 2
@king7654321 Yes, however they retain no neanderthal mtDNA , meaning in archaic populations it was the "modern human" female who mated with neanderthal and the offspring raised by her tribe/family. Any neanderthal mother's who mated with modern human males kept her offspring with her tribe/group.
2degucitas 1 year ago
@king7654321
Umm no they weren't. They had smaller EQ, more primitive prefrontal lobe. They were bigger and stronger and native to the continent but Cromagnon man came and wiped them out/out competed them (war, disease, exposure, famine).I severely doubt they were smarter.
gunninlinguist 1 year ago
@gunninlinguist I just got done watching bbc documentaries on the neanderthal when I wrote that comment. In my opinion, I see it to be correct but I'll need to do further research. Several sources say that most cacausian and asian people have 1-4% neanderthal genes so there may be some inter-species mingling that went on. Here is video for you to watch: watch?v=3LVp4MOh-gc
king7654321 1 year ago
@king7654321 LIES we were better hunters and had better comunity spirit something that neanderthals didnt have. They wern't stupid but they were not as clever as us. If they were smarter they would have remained and beaten us. They did interbreed yes, but their DNA is only found in very few europeans which would indicate the gene is not very present nor very strong in the current HOMO SAPIENS living in Europe.
LeonaRulez 1 year ago
@LeonaRulez black LIES too..did u know the mighty Méroé civ (black, southern Egypt, little pyramids..u know it i am sure..black theorists say THEy were the 1st pyramid centers, normal historians say they were late imitations to claim legitimity..so long..)..well..did u know that Méroé first money source was..slavery, provider of black poor guys from the south?..no myth alas, the story of slavery is not what ur dogma wants to tell u, ALAS..insiders traitors, yes, from start..not just 'romans'..((
sunset002007 1 year ago
@king7654321 intellectually superior? ha think not, they in were in Europe for thousands of years and never progressed from stone tools, lived in caves, didn't make any artwork- cave paintings, no noticeable system of trade, and with those muscular arms and all they still used thrusting spears and never developed projectile points, they didn't even master any form of fishing it seems. so where do you get this information about intellectual superiority?
Lily2U1515 1 year ago
whites are descendants of masai of east africa.
ebeledi 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@fungusamogus "black are from monkeys, and we are from black,
so WHITE ARE THE MORE EVOLUTED SPECIE. "
You have mistaken genetic recessiveness, with evolution.
NSLBC 1 year ago
What do black people gain from predating whites in Europe? Why not study real black history in West Africa? Contrary to popular belief West Africa had thriving civilizations contemporary with ancient Greece and China.
iamthebest91 1 year ago
we know history dating all the way back to chirst stop trying to fool people anoither lie and you could do the same with taht skull with any colors people idiot
CrazyFavVideos 1 year ago
@KarelYalek
Don't put people down when there are clear examples to dismiss your point of view.
The Neantherthals are alive and well within you.
Delusions of Grandeur. What sense does it make to argue over this anyway. If you find one point of view i can find one that contrast yours. So the argument goes on and on and on. If your a racist pig just say so. Go to the Aryan or Arab sites that hates blacks.
You can join the rest of humanity when your finished being brainwashed.
chullyhead 2 years ago
It amazes me, the number of idiots on this site. Blacks have a low I.Q. Africa is shit. Blacks are slaves. Blah Blah Blah. That's basically what you want to get across to the masses.
Okay I get it we whites are Gods. We have never been enslaved before. Nor did we enslave each other. We've always been literate. We never copied anything from any other race. We just magically woke up one day, and said " I'm going to conquer and educate this world." Yes sir. We are Gods.***
SARCASM***
chullyhead 2 years ago 4
@chullyhead ,you dick.
daehoidareht 1 year ago
@chullyhead we have been enslaved, the Romans enslaved us.
LeonaRulez 1 year ago
The first Europeans where the Neanderthal and then came the Cro Magnon man.
Neanderthal have already been proven by DNA to be a different species, meaning, homo-sapiens could not produce offspring with them.
wetweasel56 2 years ago
meaning, homo-sapiens could not produce offspring with them.
Actually that POV has been quietly ditched by Svante Paabo, leading geneticist in charge of comparing Neanderthal and Human genomes. He has said they probably did produce offspring
scruffypair 2 years ago
Just as we could mate with Chimps who are 98% related to us genetically?
wetweasel56 2 years ago
Just as we could mate with Chimps who are 98% related to us genetically?
Actually the general belief is that we could, but it wouldn't be fertile due to chromosomal incomatability, like a mule.
Neanderthals were A LOT more similar, "within the range of normal human variation" was the quote, if I remember right.
scruffypair 2 years ago
@scruffypair
they've tried to do this many times throughout recent history, but its never worked
gerblewienercat 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 if this was true, then how come after milloions of years no one has? Im shure by noe some one would have matted with a monkey, if it was really possible it would have happened already. People have sex with animals even in this day and age so if it was possible there would be half humins half monkeys all over the place.
mystic81006 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 Really?!?! You think we could mate with chimps?!!!!! AWSOME!!!!! That would be... Awesome... JUST! AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lol! though... I wander who would try it? LOL!!!!!!
mcfrandy 1 year ago
@mcfrandy....I'm sure someone mated with chimps at least once in history but we cannot produce offspring with them.
wetweasel56 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 Oh.... How do you know? has there been any documented proof? Or even just a story? I think they should mikes chinmp and human DNA together... you know like how they make clones!
I just think it's the COOLEST! Idea.... Half human, half chimp............................
mcfrandy 1 year ago
@mcfrandy.... what do you mean? We have them already. Their called Negro's. LOL!
wetweasel56 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 Uuum... I don't think thats very funny... :+(
mcfrandy 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 THAT CHIMP WOULD KILL YOU.WHAT FOOL WOULD EXPOSE HIS JUNK TO A CHIMP TO BE RIPPED OFF.
ohmphthschwrhu 2 months ago
@scruffypair You are right! We have no Neanderthal mtDNA on our side, but 1-4% other dna from interbreeding. Non modern africans retain the dna.
2degucitas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wetweasel56 Cool!... but look what scruffypair says, he says: Actually that POV has been quietly ditched by Svante Paabo, leading geneticist in charge of comparing Neanderthal and Human genomes. He has said they probably did produce offspring
mcfrandy 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 Explain why they've discovered Neanderthal DNA in modern humans? Read a book before you lecture.
MichaelnChristine 1 year ago
@MichaelnChristine....we share 98% of our DNA with Chimps too. So your point?
wetweasel56 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 Ahhh. You don't really understand DNA. Got it. Time to move on. Arguing with an ignoramus takes far, far too much effort, and with little or no chance of penetration. Sufficed to say that you and your sexual partner share DNA commonalities but having a baby together isn't really inbreeding. Or maybe it is....
MichaelnChristine 1 year ago
@MichaelnChristine....all you are doing is writing at length to inject insult toward me and no other explanations. That's a true sign of someone that has failed.
If we share a pattern of DNA sequencing that is similar to a Neanderthal that is not saying we are from them or that we mated with them. We are all human species and we are going to have similar DNA patterns to a point.
But back to the original point. Nothing has proven the first Euros were black. They may have carried a black skull.
wetweasel56 1 year ago
@wetweasel56 Oh it's a racial thing....wow you are a pathetic little fool aren't you. Please stop posting on the Internet. Maybe go to your Tea Party meeting, or a prayer group....pathetic.
MichaelnChristine 1 year ago