Poland is right to say Jackson used metaphors but he still failed because Jackson turned a girl's envisioning of heaven into a wannabe WDMC crock of shit. The film dishonors the book by avoiding everything it set out to accomplish; the biggest flaw being that it doesn't even show the challenges the parents faced in the novel. Where is Abigail's contempt for motherhood? That is one of the reasons other than Susie's death why she left her family.
The film claims to be an adaptation of Sebold's novel, but does it really prove it is? No. Look at Grandma Lynn. She is supposed to be holding the family together but instead we have a comedy sequence. That's fucking brilliant, eh? Then we have Ray and Susie/Jack and Abigail just getting together for convenience and Lindsey's struggle to get independence from Susie's death exorcised from the movie. That's why this movie failed. Because Jackson didn't care.
us normal joe public loved this movie sooooo why do all the media critics hate it???they tell us crap movies like transformers..spiderman..indiana jones...avatar are brillant....they want 2 turn cinema into a computer game or fairground ride...soulless cold modern cinema......eye loved this movie and eye liked this fellas review
I agree with EVERY you said. It is unsettling. It's like you are a more articulate version of me. I look forward to hearing what you have to say after you saw it a second time. why was this movie not nominated for Best Picture (among other category nods)?
the movie was great and unsettling. I went in expecting the movie to be bad (because of reviews), but I found it to be very interesting. The story makes you focus on something very unsettling (the rape and murder of Susie Salmon...this is not shown for those who are concerned, but it is implied and left for the interpretation of viewers). The narration and execution of the story is very fluid and deep. Stanley Tucci's performance is also excellent and worth noting.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Correct me if I'm wrong. If you're adapting the film, you wouldn't NEED Stanlet Tucci's character. The film would be about loss. As such, the film should have stayed in that direction as a story. This film was not a powerful piece. It was a film that should have never been adapted. And FILM is a collective medium. That means if you make a film, for who is it for? Answer: THE AUDIENCE. If you find your own story and it caters to only yourself as an artist, it becomes an excercise in masturbation.
You are the first reviewer to actually get this movie. Your review was fantastic. I feel the same way about this film as i'm sure many others do. I have seen this movie twice so far and i think this movie requires more viewings than that. I'm looking foward to seeing it again.
One of the best movies of the season I think. I actually saw the movie at the cinema but them came home and watched it online. The site was movies-playing . c o m. It was a very good quality copy.
The movie was complete and utter shit, other than the graphics and the actor choices. If you have read the book, it was completely different from the movie. So many scenes were cut out, so many key details were just ignored.
Most people were confused when I had talked to them about the movie, as was I once I saw it, even though I had read the book. The plotline was very hard to follow, the first 3/4 of the movie was long and drawn out, and the last 1/4 was rushed.
Comment removed
gamerzndplayerz 1 year ago
Poland is right to say Jackson used metaphors but he still failed because Jackson turned a girl's envisioning of heaven into a wannabe WDMC crock of shit. The film dishonors the book by avoiding everything it set out to accomplish; the biggest flaw being that it doesn't even show the challenges the parents faced in the novel. Where is Abigail's contempt for motherhood? That is one of the reasons other than Susie's death why she left her family.
TheCanadianPrairies 1 year ago
@TheCanadianPrairies
The film claims to be an adaptation of Sebold's novel, but does it really prove it is? No. Look at Grandma Lynn. She is supposed to be holding the family together but instead we have a comedy sequence. That's fucking brilliant, eh? Then we have Ray and Susie/Jack and Abigail just getting together for convenience and Lindsey's struggle to get independence from Susie's death exorcised from the movie. That's why this movie failed. Because Jackson didn't care.
TheCanadianPrairies 1 year ago
@TheCanadianPrairies right. he went ahead and spent 3 years of his life on something he didnt care about. :roll:
ajmrowland 1 year ago
@ajmrowland
Well, it sure didn't show in the movie. It seems those years ended up giving us a dumbed down, watered down version of Sebold's story.
TheCanadianPrairies 1 year ago
this movie had a beautiful message, but it was EXTREMELY BORING, a movie is a movie, and this movie was terrible.. as far as movies go...
thedarkcow64 1 year ago
Dude, U R a penis with ears! This film totally missed the mark and your scarf is gay.
Did you actually look at yourself before you started filming?
beauty8116 1 year ago
i cant wait to buy the blu-ray disc... 5 stars!
GeorgeV6v24 1 year ago
yo a fucking moron... this film is the worst film ever made. Seriously, no joke
ixf05u 1 year ago
us normal joe public loved this movie sooooo why do all the media critics hate it???they tell us crap movies like transformers..spiderman..indiana jones...avatar are brillant....they want 2 turn cinema into a computer game or fairground ride...soulless cold modern cinema......eye loved this movie and eye liked this fellas review
eyewoodsay 1 year ago
I agree with EVERY you said. It is unsettling. It's like you are a more articulate version of me. I look forward to hearing what you have to say after you saw it a second time. why was this movie not nominated for Best Picture (among other category nods)?
scricketball 1 year ago
pfftt...i downloaded it at MOVIEPRINCESS [ DOTT ] COM
rogalaayannaya 2 years ago
the movie was great and unsettling. I went in expecting the movie to be bad (because of reviews), but I found it to be very interesting. The story makes you focus on something very unsettling (the rape and murder of Susie Salmon...this is not shown for those who are concerned, but it is implied and left for the interpretation of viewers). The narration and execution of the story is very fluid and deep. Stanley Tucci's performance is also excellent and worth noting.
Rhapthorne3 2 years ago 13
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Correct me if I'm wrong. If you're adapting the film, you wouldn't NEED Stanlet Tucci's character. The film would be about loss. As such, the film should have stayed in that direction as a story. This film was not a powerful piece. It was a film that should have never been adapted. And FILM is a collective medium. That means if you make a film, for who is it for? Answer: THE AUDIENCE. If you find your own story and it caters to only yourself as an artist, it becomes an excercise in masturbation.
pickerman123 2 years ago
I saw this movie 3 times each time I would get something new...I get it...I loved it and thought it was perfect and was the cast.
cocoavibes 2 years ago 31
You are the first reviewer to actually get this movie. Your review was fantastic. I feel the same way about this film as i'm sure many others do. I have seen this movie twice so far and i think this movie requires more viewings than that. I'm looking foward to seeing it again.
csnell14 2 years ago 30
I didnt really understand wat he said..but Im gonna watch it :)
leogeckos 2 years ago 10
im so glad that you're so unbiased.
casiesilverman 2 years ago 11
nice vid upload.
crochetstar12 2 years ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
Sweet... Streamed this in fullscreen at => A Plus Movies . com
Joanaxxe 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice! Just saw this in high quality at =>
Your Movie HQ . com
Janellagob 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cool... Saw movie in high quality at --> Big Movie Share . com
ronaldGolab563 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One of the best movies of the season I think. I actually saw the movie at the cinema but them came home and watched it online. The site was movies-playing . c o m. It was a very good quality copy.
marianwhales 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The movie was complete and utter shit, other than the graphics and the actor choices. If you have read the book, it was completely different from the movie. So many scenes were cut out, so many key details were just ignored.
Most people were confused when I had talked to them about the movie, as was I once I saw it, even though I had read the book. The plotline was very hard to follow, the first 3/4 of the movie was long and drawn out, and the last 1/4 was rushed.
kawasakigod424 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U're a joke and no better than those wanna be critics around the web... Like this guy said, Movie is a Movie and book is a book.
This movie was just amazing. I totally and absolutely love it.
xBaRLoGx 2 years ago 10
Comment removed
LJeston 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Looked *everywhere* for this but only found one site that had a good version. it's The Movie Dir . com
Edwinauppj 2 years ago
Wow! I'll never forget this movie.
tubetrekker30 2 years ago 18
you give a very good take on movies. I think i am going to ahead and see it
TheBSxperience 2 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
omg they didnt include sooo much that was in the book..i was upsett
BackToGoAgain 2 years ago
I figured that Jackson used metaphors in the movie to convey Susie's need to move on.
TheCanadianPrairies 2 years ago 5
This movie wasn't was I expected at ALL. That's a good thing though. I thought is was great.
andrewchard 2 years ago 16
This movie is unique and one of the better films to be made by Jackson. Great review David. You give a very unbiased opinion.
real1acer 2 years ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
i like ur preppy sweater
brandonpringle16 2 years ago
Very Good Review
brendansmith1252 2 years ago 35
Ryan gossling can't hold a candle to Mark Whalberg, but a fair review,
It is nice to see a review from an other angle
marazification 2 years ago 17
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, at least there's ONE positive review for this film... Unfortunately, it seems like most reviewers thinks it sucks. :(
Markunator 2 years ago
ive seen the trailer and it seems really good! im going to watch it the day it comes out in my country, hopefully <3
=)
EllieUnderworld 2 years ago 30
ive seen it the movie is great( it pays to work at the theatre
ezkeyboardkid58 2 years ago 64
great review that makes me excited for the movie :)
ooooneeee 2 years ago 37