Added: 2 years ago
From: RussiaToday
Views: 51,845
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (341)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Now this is the weapon i want to own 1 day. Greates assault rifle on the planet by far

  • Only in russia even the news anchors carry Kalashinkovs!

  • If its not Made in Russia, its shit. I wouldnt want a shitty knockoff... Almost impossible to find a Russian made AK in the US... and if you do its gonna cost you.... a lot.

  • @Hatinonthehaters The Saiga's and Vepr's are made in Russia. Although sporterized there are companies that convert them to be 922r compliant with a handfull of american parts. Also Atlantic Arms has some other Russian part kit AK's assembled in the USA made by Red Jacket Arms. Check Atlantic Arms sight. Expect to pay $1000 to $1500.

  • 1 in 6 guns are AK-47s (true fact)

  • Its too bad here in US we can't get a decent AK that doesn't cost a fortune. The US made ones seems shitty. So I'll stick with my AR.

  • @jsrscbr Easy to get Chinese and arabian ones. Most american guns are made kind of shitty (ones by the gov). America has put an end to importing weapons, and once current stocks are sold, you can only buy american made guns.

  • @jsrscbr you don't like ak??

  • @sergeikozin47 I do, but it seems more of a challenge than just buying a new AR. I'm going to look at an arsenal tomorrow.

  • @jsrscbr try to buy a russian ak-74, its worth the price. i try to bury my 74 in sand, mud, and water and its still kickin...

  • i want an actual russian AK but i live in canada so that will never happen.

  • Unsurpassed? Sure.....

    It may be reliable and can take a beating like almost no other weapon, but I wouldn't call the AK-47 family the best in the world. Personally I'd rather have a G3.

  • @mobius1aic is the g3 reliable enough to be abused to the limit where where its rusted and still fire? tell me............... i do not know much about the german hk series. why do youthink they are the best?

  • @cossack9991 To be honest, I don't think a G3 could take the same beating, but the G3 will put more rounds on target with better accuracy with the more powerful 7.62 x 51 mm NATO round. However, the G3 is still from what I know an extremely reliable weapon, and because it is a "battle rifle" being full 7.62 x 51, arguably, it shouldn't be compared.

  • @mobius1aic wait. is the g3 full automatic or semi. i fired an akm before ( bulgarian version). i found it easy enough to control when fired in bursts. it was also easier to fire on semiautomatic.i know that the nato round is much more powerfull than the 7.62 mm but shouldn't that round call for more recoil than the ak?

  • @cossack9991 Full auto G3s are the norm. I'm not familiar with each weapon's recoil characteristics, my gut feeling is that the AK climbs and jumps around more because the G3 is a straighter design that should help transfer recoil energy into the shooters shoulder better. It was this aspect that the standard M14 lacks that made it a terrible weapon to use in full auto when moving. However, like the G3, the M14 is an awesome battle rifle when used as such.

  • @mobius1aic agreed because the ak has a chunk of metal/the bolt that goes back and forward when shot and when it goes back it creates alot of recoil

  • @cossack9991

    i've never fired the AK, but the G3 is very difficult to control on full-auto after the 3rd round. Controlling the trigger isn't that difficult though. Also requires a lot of practise cause it kicks like a mule on single fire.

  • @CJBombaYe buy a russian ak..

  • @sergeikozin47

    g3 is better for sharpshooting and the ak is better for assault

  • @CJBombaYe yes i know, i love the looks of g3. for me its is more powerful ung the m4a1, m15 and ar15 gun, but i still stick to my ak74...

  • G3's more powerful than the AK as well, but the FN-FAL is the most powerful auto-rifle. I think the AK is best in a war situation, because it's tough and doesn't need so much cleaning like a G3.

  • @CJBombaYe oh, is the g3 has a very complicated mechanism??

  • @sergeikozin47

    no at all, if you can strip an AK, the G3 shouldn't be a problem. Once a lorry drove over a G3 laying in the mud and it was bent and useless. On discovery channel I saw an AK take more punishment and it could still fire.

  • @CJBombaYe its because of its simplicity...

  • @CJBombaYe G3's are an inbetween rifle meaning also for longer distant shooting. So hence the need for a 30% more powerful bullet. G3's have longer barrels and are bulky. The AK is close skirmish gun. Less recoil,light and more agile. The C series Cetme is fairly light though. Different guns for different needs. I understand that platoons in east bloc countries would remedy the problem of distance shooting with issuing at least one or two marksmans a dragunov or variant like the PSL.

  • @cossack9991

    AK has cheaper and easier to find ammunition, it's more reliable, and certainly easier to be taught how to use, strip and clean.

    The G3 is much harder hitting, much more accurate, and longer ranged. I wouldn't be worried about reliability at all, as I hear the G3 is well beyond other weapons in this regard. Ammunition would be my main concern, though it wouldn't be hard to find it the US, but it is heavier and more expensive.

  • @cossack9991 At close range the usefulness of the G3 diminishes more than the AK's since it would be harder to control on automatic. But in the right hands, they are still completely useful close in, though a general submachinegun would still be better.

  • oh yeah sure "ak are rightly sold in the united states"

    bullshit, other countries sell them fairly aswell as illegaly.

  • Lol the woman is so nervous around that firearm. Guy should have informed her: it's an inanimate object. If you have no reason to fear the man holding it, then you have no reason to fear the object.

  • Most of the time I watch videos about the weapons in different parts of the world. I dont know why the human is so silly and fool. he is making weapons just for himself, to kill his own human beings. look at this example, how many klashinkovs are there in the world, and thats why thousands of innocent people have been killed due to this weapon so for, and how many will be killed more, we dont know. very sad.

  • @BROskavichSKI

    No one needs to talk in your Yankee Redneck Langudge

    shut your trap !

  • Why do they keep bragging about how easy it is to use? Pretty much every rifle I have is easy to use, You load the mag and place inside, put the lever back then you aim and fire at the enemy, simple. All these people just parrot the same info over and over again. The best parts about the AK47 is it is tough and doesn't jam, you don't have to take it apart ever so why people go on and on about taking it apart, no need to, just add some grease and go kill people. Other rifles are so simple also

  • Why can't this bitch speak english? She can't say PATENT or DISASSEMBLE right. Fucking retard.

  • @stuntmanmike37 My guess it's a disease called non American. At the moment, it's incurable, you ass fuck.

  • @CaptSanderson Yeah, well hopefully American colonization should have it eradicated by the end of the decade. As for the bitch, she sounds fucking American to me. Maybe she could learn how to anunciate better by sucking my cock. What do you think of that captain?

  • looks like 5 noobs like M-16

  • @spowperu Do you know how many men lost their lives being shot with a 5.56mm bullet coming from an M16 type rifle since the early 60's? Why don't we ask them what they think.

  • @semiautoriflelover you can all claim body counts from the AR/AK, but the fact of the matter is until 1992 and the mass sale of AKs after the fall of the wall, the FN FAO held the cassualty crown world wide! It saw far more action in every corner of the world then M16/AR lovers could ever dream.. they dont called it the "right hand of the free world" for nothing.. It wasnt until the massive soviet stockpiles of AKs were liquidated to 3rd world conflict zones that the AK came truely into its own.

  • @Heineken57sauce Thats not true, the AK has been used in more conflicts and has been used to kill more people than anything else,

  • @theunsuspecting yes "now" it holds the title of course, but like i already said prior to the 90's most Aks were in the hands of government troops/ or in soviet stockpiles... Once the wall came down and they flooded the black market world wide, the low cost, simplicity, reliability, and full auto 7.62X39 killing power reigned supreme... until then 3rd world conflict was mainly communists with AKs vrs capitalists with FNs "the capitalist governments usually having better trained armies...

  • fackin asssshole!!! don,t take wapon  if you do.nt know what to do with IT!!!!!! RUSSIAN AK _47! ---bEst

  • ROFLMAO! She looks so scared like she's ready to pee in her panties.

  • That "model" looked quite real to me =P

  • It's simply the eastern bloc's AR. Comprimises accuracy for sheer stopping power and durability. I'll take an AK47 over an AK74 any day. I wish i had an original soviet AK from 1948 and some drum magazines. It'd be the shit.

  • Though we've come quite a ways from Kalashnikov's era, when the 'assault rifle' was almost completely nonexistant (Outside of germany anyway). There's certainly better. Nothing will ever be quite as simple or as durable, but there's certainly more powerful, ranged and accurate rifles out there.

    I mean, An F2000 is pretty awesome, more accurate and debatable in power compared to an AK74, but unlike an AK74 if you drop it it may break into a million pieces lol.

  • @peepeevagi Actually I wouldn't say the F2000 is more, "powerful" (by powerful, I'm assuming you are meaning more damage that can be inflicted to a person). The 5.45x39 bullet can actually inflict more damage inside a persons body cavity because of the way it's designed. The bullet is your typical full metal jacket (a lead core surrounded by a copper jacket) but a small piece of the lead inner core in the tip of the bullet is removed This makes the bullet Keyhole in targets, spinning inside them

  • @peepeevagi While the .223 round is a smaller bullet that does the same effect, but the larger bullet can inflict more damage because, well, it's a bigger piece of metal going through your body and it tends to spin more than the .223 would. As far as accuracy is concerned, the AK-74 is indeed very accurate (a common misconception that it isn't) And for range, most modern warfare is held within about a 300 meter range thus Kalashnikov designed his weapon to be highly effective in this range.

  • @peepeevagi dont know what your talking about the ak74 is just as accurate as the m16, the 5.45x39 does more damage to a humen body than a 5.56 NATO bullet and the ak74 will shoot any time and everywhere. the russian 5.45 bullet is simply better than a 5.56 NATO bullet for causing damage to humen body.

  • 5.45 may be better, but versus other 'small caliber' assault rifles the difference is almost negligible. 5.56 carries more force to the target than 5.45 (1700 joules to the 5.45's 1300), and it's accurate at much longer ranges with less drop over distance than 5.45. But they're both about equal as far as real usage goes, both perform well in combat.

    I dont know, i still prefer my cetme in .308 to any 'lighter' weapon xD

  • As far as the actual guns themselves go, the AK-74 IS NOT as accurate as the M16. It comes close though (Again, negligible difference). It has variants that surpass the M16 in accuracy though, including that one model with the two shot burst that basically puts two rounds in the exact same spot as if they were one bullet lol.

    On paper, the M16 is better. But as far as actually fighting using them, they perform similar enough to be called the same. Only the AK-74 has a tumbling bullet :P

  • @peepeevagi LOL thats the an94. quite a gun and kalashnikov did not made that one. and seriously ak74 is just as accurate as the m16. but this is my opinion maybe you had some other experience with the ak74 and m16.

  • @peepeevagi That is total bullshit, I've fired every AK47 type made and none were more accurate as any AR15 with a heavy match grade barrel that is free floated. You don't see anyone ever going against M16s/AR15s in service rifle matches. The 7.62x39 round is not as accurate as the .223/5.56, that is a huge limiting factor, the fact you can freefloat the barrel on an AR15 is a HUGE factor, heavy free floated match barrels and match ammo.

  • @peepeevagi The new 77gr match round used now in Afgan does tumble when it hits and it has an open tip, very accurate round getting long range kills.

  • It's still not .223 accurate. It's close though. It's an assault rifle round, .223 is a regular small rifle round. Different purposes, one's just outright more accurate than the other by design.

  • @peepeevagi The 77gr round is a .223 5.56 round, they are using that in the M4s and special purpose long range M16s using scopes, they can get kills out to 700 meters. That round is 1"groups in my friends gun, Black hills makes the ammo.

  • @jijdom Bullshit, You can add a match grade heavy barrel to an AR15 and free float it, AK74 is not as accurate, if you think so buy one then we can have a shooting match. There is no (zero) videos with them going head to head with AK74 more accurate.

  • She is trying to set him up. It started when she said, " is anything ehh.. done to control the manufacture of this weapon?" What she actually meant: Why isn"t this gun controlled, I am outraged that this gun isn't strictly controlled. She is also afraid of guns and even said herself she doesn't know much about guns and weapons in general. She is mortified that she is even in the same room as an AK.

  • haha title says 74 not 47

  • @DaRuzz because it AK 74 not 47 ahahahaha

  • @yurtaevi bla bla I skipped the most of the video...

  • i wonder what kalash will come up with next already an awesome weapon perhaps he should come up with an even better verstion that matches or even better beats the U.S standard rifles after all we can buy tech from the U.S now

  • I love my Bulgarian AK-74. It IS my favorite rifle. 5.45mm is cheap and a blast to shoot.

  • So the Chinese AK is an illegal copy of the russian AK huh ?

    Other than the fact that the Soviets gave China the technical data in order to build the Ak, I guess he's right.

    Sorta like the time when my brother stole my car after i gave him my car keys and $20 for gas.

  • Also the AK-47 is a 99% copy of the German Stg44

  • @Dogmeat1950

    "AK-47 is a 99% copy" are you kidding me?Did you ever know AK-47 and Sturmgewehr 44 construction?This assault rifles are only looking similar.And few set of hardware(which used in both rifles) was known before stg44 and kalashnikov.You do not know what you are writed...

  • Interesting little segment... Could you imagine one of the women on the "Today Show" sitting down to watch someone dissemble and M-16, and tell them what a neat gun they thought it was?

  • glad to be half russian

  • that woman cannot pronounce words... 2:50 she miss pronounces "disassemble", and 1:31 she miss pronounces "patent"

  • He must take out the magazine first

  • America events an lot of weapons but Russian makes them better.

  • @theabomation What are you smoking, dumbass? Russia doesnt buy anything from the US, nor use any US orginated weaponry..... They make their own..

  • Forgot to remove the bolt from the bolt carrier.

  • this guy should go back and use a pussie Famas. (hes frence..)

  • Recently an older Jewish man had nothing but generalizations to say such as atheists are stupid and praise Jesus. I won't repeat his name but I know it was fake as he claims to have no money and seemed to turn the conversation we had into begging. Someone explain to me the necessity to beg in a mall wearing a full suit and having a full cover story including their fake US name written on plank? He also said he smoked crack and asked if I was on any drugs before he followed me to MacDonald's.

  • pay tent?

  • @6U4RD1AN -- OH FFS .. The US, GB and Israel are the world's biggest arms & weapons sellers. You koolaid-swilling braindead sheep-following naive rightwing dolt. Read a book once in awhile to challenge your delusional worldview. Many of the most oppressive governments, from Africa to Asia to South America, are US-installed and supplied with US weapons.

  • NOPE, your asumptions about me are wrong, just take a look at the wars all over the world in the past 20 years or so, not only Afganistan and Irak, and you will see what are the procedence of the weapons. USA is very bad, but the weapons it solds are big contracts of defense to goverments not black market sales.

  • Also the most opresive goverments are not USA backed nowadays, are comunist and islamic, though Saudi Arabia is both islamic and US backed.

    War is a dirty business...

  • @6U4RD1AN

    US is doing that even to this day on a larger scale, fucking hypocrite. You're just brainwashed to react when someone else does it other than the glorious American empire.

  • russian terror

  • russian terror

    fuck russia

    any terrorists in thr world use russian equipment

    russian are terrorsts supporter

  • @eee545 i always wonder how retard one can get.

    did you find weapons of mass destruction in iraq? what are you doing in afganistan?

    i hope one beautiful morning north korea and venesuella will send you a couple dozen of humanitarian hydrogen missiles, to clear brains.

  • @eee545 is a fucking jew, look at his profile!

  • @DmitryDaren

    what is the problem ?

    Anti-Semitism or more russian terror against us !

    no Russian no terror

    no weapons seller to the terrorists

    no AK47 no RPG`s with terrorists in the world

    world without Russia a world of peace

    the curse upon Russia and you

    moron

  • @eee545

    what is my proplem? your nation has written into bible the instruction how to eslave the world by debt. Rotshild family implemented this scheme. FED prints empty money and makes all the world use it. All govts are corrupted exept now Venesuela and north korea. The bankers-jews made WW1 WW2, all middle east slaughter for their profits. You FED caused the economic crysis and FEd is owned be Jews. A. Jackson and JFK tried to stop you and you killed them. Dont play you know all that.

  • @DmitryDaren do you use drug or some thing ? bullshit hhhhhhhhhhhhh kahhhh jews better pepole on earth your bible just lie and bullshit stupid Russian terrorist Russian stop selling weapons to the terrorists stop killing others stop terror support long live USA fuck Russia country of terror
  • @eee545 What exactly is bullshit of what I have said? Who killed Andrew Jackson and JF Kennedey and for what? Who owns the Federal Reserve, which is not federal and has no reserve? How does FED produce dollars-d. was backed by gold before 1931 now its just a debt. Jews cause debt to all world.

    My bible? Your fucking bible!- it was written by the f*ing jews.

    Read books for a start- Confessions of an Economic Hitman by John Perkins. Or watch Money as Debt or Zeitgeist Addendum if you cant read.

  • @DmitryDaren hey you shut up asshole stop spamming on this vid and write your bullshit in other place Liar liar liar you are just fucking terrorist like most Russians terror lie spam envy USA gratest strongest richest country on earth Russia ! large country of terror exporter
  • @eee545

    You did not respond to a single question, you brainwashed moron.

    Nobody from common people wants to attack your country, and normal americans are not brainwashed like you. I have American friends- they are socialists, they would kill this government if they could.

    You are one judoine piece of shame for america.

    Your nation enslaved america and caused the economic crisis of 30s and now.

    Jews caused all major wars.

    But Now with the internet, its not long time that world will know.

  • @eee545 Answer to a single question, ill try to put it in kindergarden language, for your small brain:

    The banks own everything as you know, because every single dollar issued as a loan and must be paid back to the bank. Not only the principal amount but also the interest, so BANKS OWN ALL PLUS A LITTLE MORE. AND WHO OWNS THE BANKS? WHO DEVISED THIS FUCKING SCHEME? the fucking jews!

  • @eee545 Now without using any drug, just the rubber gloves to protect me against this shit, Im opening this shit called old testament, and read:

    Deuteronomy 4.1 in short: "behold, Israel, i shall give you the instructions how to conquer the earth... 23.19- though shalst not lend with interest to your brother neither silver nor bread nothing that can be lend with interest, but do lend to a foreigner, so that god shall bless thee to come and take the land... 28.12. And though shall reign many...

  • @eee545 (continued)... and though shall reign many nations, and they shallst not reingn though...

    Isaias, 60.10 And sons of foreigners shall built your walls, and foreign kings shall serve thee... 60.12. and the peoples and kingdoms that dont serve thee shall be destroyed ...

    So you made US the tool of world enslavement. and FED its primary ammunition.

    Tell me now, you werent aware of all this judoine shit! The Jew that does not know his own shit!

  • @eee545 Look at the Jew!

    In Russia they shout "Fuck America"

    In America they shout "Fuck Russia"

    ?

    ..... profit!

    The world must put them in a cage and make do the normal jobs, not only banking- what they like most.

  • @DmitryDaren AGREED FAKE JEWS WILL BETRAY YOU LIKE THAT GUY WHO BETRAYED JESUS AFTER LAST SUPPER.

  • @dooooooer Ha. You don't even know which "guy" you're talking about

  • @DmitryDaren You're silly. That's cause jews in Russia are Russians (who have good reason to hate America) while jews in America are Americans (who are brainwashed to hate Russia). It happens for all races. Guess what: Koreans in North Korea say fuck South Korea, while Koreans in South Korea say fuck North Korea. That doesn't make them evil or whatever.

    Note that I in no way approve of the fascist state of Israel. I just don't think you should hate jews just because of what Israel does.

  • @carvakommie Hehehehe fuck u jew :D FUCK U AMERICA AND ISRAEL :D

  • @carvakommie South Koreans don't say fuck North Korea. There are many South Koreans with family members who were forced to stay in North Korea. Every year, month, or day, I'm not sure which one it is, but there is a group of South Koreans who let ballons with notes, and money to fly off to North Korea, telling them that they are not forgotten. Exactly how are we Americans brainwashed to hate Russia? And why does Russia have a reason to hate us?

  • There really is no point in trying to improve the ak-47, it is fine the way it is.

  • "watch this guys and i'll show you how a real infantry weapon works."

  • Wow she combined a russian accent with a southern drawl.

  • She looks scared of the gun. xD

  • S U P E R K L A C H N I K O V ! C O O L !

  • really bad editing, get rid of the sound from the background film clips.

  • @kurbanica It have to expire by now for sure.

  • Comment removed

  • LOL Bulgarian AKs better than Russian ones!!! I had a bad day but this really fixed it for me. Thanks for a laugh.

  • thouse are the facts, like it or not, even M. Kalashinikov admits that, so laugh all you want, it is free :D but don't tell any one about what you think, because they wont laugh with you! :D:D:D

  • Hhahaha Kalashnikov admits that Bulgarians make a better Kalashnikov!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is a first. Grow up kid.

  • I sugest that you read a book or two on the matter, and try to be moere informed ot tings you koment. If you go in a ex Warsaupakt country and say that the Russian AK is better they will laugh at you! GROW up youself!!!

  • I am from Eastern Europe myself. I am of military heritage, meaning a family members of mine has faught in both World Wars, and some were later deployed to Middle East and elsewhere as officers of the Yugoslavian army. I have never heard any of them speak of Bulgarian AK the way you say. When i mentioned what you just said to one of them, he just looked at me trying to figure out if i was serious or joking. This is a career soldier here, a highly ranked officer, so no GROW UP.

  • Well it fagures form your point of vew, Tge Yugoslavian army never used Bulgarian AK's! But since you are from a milatery herutage, you may try to make an expwriment, take a buglagrian and a russian one, test them and than answer me back. OK?

  • @kurbanica

    You're delusional. Bulgarian AK's, especially ones by Arsenal are HORRIBLE. The best way to know is to ask someone who fired one.

    I fired one. The heat on the front grip wasn't vented properly. It MELTED IN MY HANDS after two magazines. That's faulty manufacturing right there. You won't get skips in quality like that from Izhmash.

  • @SiroDra If you have fired an Arsenal SLR , I agree with you. That is because it is a sports rifle, witch is ment to be fired in semiauto only, but there are same vesions whith a fullauto capability and the suck, I was talking about the milatery ones, not thouse for civilian use.

  • @eee545 hi cock sucker

  • @LuciDoFer

    stupid moron

    fuck U

  • whould you suck me for blow ?

  • Changing the country's name from Soviet Union to Russia doesn't give you the exclusive right to correct the mistakes that you've have made during the Soviet times. The licensing was distributed during the Soviet times, what's lost is lost the deal was already made.

  • I agree. They gave loads of countries the machining and tooling to make them during the cold war. Expecting a patent for a 60 year old rifle is unrealistic.

  • russian are terrorists supporter

    selling Weapons to terrorists to kill Children and womens

  • fucking idiot, if there's a demand there is a supply. its a free market

  • Americans on the other hand, are peacelovers, and help peopole everywhere, by triingout how men, wemen and children react to bulets and stabing!

  • looool

  • thats apretty damn good looking model....

  • Yea that's really a great rifle. Im 15 and I can dissasemble AK 74 for 8-10 seconds. Our trainer that the best result he saw is 3 or 4 secs.

  • theres at least 2 things ill always respect the Russians for; they beat the Germans in WW2...and the AK series of assault rifles

  • Comment removed

  • ya go back and read about the Battle of Moscow, the Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk, all RUSSIAN victories.....it was the Russians who beat the Germans you ignorant child

  • @aSuperbadassninja lol you brainwashed dumbass the only reason the commie scum won any battles is because of the massive amount of men thrown at the German Wehrmacht and Waffen SS. the German soldiers had far superior training, equipment, weapons and technology then the commie swine

  • @UFCMania98 yes im aware of the German superiority, however the Russians still deserve respect for their accomplishments...you say the ONLY reason the Germans were defeated was because of the amount of men they threw into battle, which is a huge slight to every Russian who participated...and as far as material is concerned, what about the T-34, or the KV-1, the Katyusha rocket launcher? the PPSH-41? The Germans greatest superiority was their general staff which was severly hampered by Hitler

  • @aSuperbadassninja dude russian soldiers suck. they died at a rate of like 1 to 10 in favor of the germans. They were system rats. Every man is expandable. Russians are like fucking rats that just keep on coming and eventually win cause of their numbers. Germans and AMericans/Brits were far better soldiers. Heck even the japanese.

  • @FcK2420 thats why you dont fuck with russians period.

  • @FcK2420

    Learn some history bud, in WW2 the US used the same tactics as the Russians, just on a smaller scale. We relied on force of numbers to achieve a tactical advantage.

  • @Goodspittin America using the same tactics as russia are you kiddding me??? You had an airforce!! russia didnt!!! eastern front was mostly urban warfare and western fought in forests and small villages???? Battle of the bulge and seige of leningrad fought with same tactics. why dont you learn some history lol.

  • @FcK2420 Russia had no AF??? Soviet Union had the largest Air Force that ever existed. And the Soviets pushed the Germans from Moscow to Berlin, that's more than just cites, that's a LOT of ground (mountains, forest, and plains) Also, the Soviet Union was the first country to use paratroopers, they pioneered the concept, the US thought the idea was ridiculous in the '30s.

  • @Goodspittin Western allies bombed Berlin not the soviets. Cos their airforce got destroyed by the germans. Germany was the first country to use paratroopers in the Invasion of Crete. Your right on the US's thought of it tho. I wish i could give you links, many german vets compared the eastern front to the western front. All said the eastern was more like a constant bloodbath with close quarters combat, and the western more like "real" war.

  • You are right. Germany was the first to use paratroopers in combat, but not the first nation to have paratroopers their first airborne unit was established 9 April 1940. The Soviets had paratroopers as early as 1936 but never deployed their airborne in great number for a number of reasons,.

    And I'll stand by what I said. The Russians had a MASSIVE air force, I never said it was effective, but they still had an AF throughout the war.

  • @Goodspittin doesnt change the fact that the theaters were fought on diffrent terms and diffrent strategies.

  • @FcK2420

    The 1 to 10 ratio is bullshit. You made that up. It wasn`t even 1 to 2

    Anyway russian soldiers did not have as much time at disposal to train as their german/american/japanese counterparts

  • @FcK2420 actually they died a whole lot less than you said AND where given the worst conditions you could imagine but still fucked up the enemy pretty well. They didn't feed the Russians and didn't supply them with necessary materials. And don't you ever refer to any human's life as a rat. If you where in their position you'd do the same- There it was like that- go fight or weather you're sick or hungry or be shot by your own officer.

  • @UFCMania98 and what about the Russian tenacity to hold on and fight no matter what? according to you it was ONLY a matter of manpower, which is completely wrong

  • @aSuperbadassninja hahaha. no, my friend. it's called commie scum propaganda. read a book called "the new kgb" and you will see that stalin ordered the nkvd to go behind enemy lines dressed as German soldiers and comitting atrocities in their names. also, if you want true Russian tenacity, look at the Russian Liberation Army. they truly fought for Russia, the commie scum red army fought for the evils of communism

  • @aSuperbadassninja and about the t-34, there were many instances where Tiger and Panther tanks took t-34's from ranges of over a kilometer. the only advantage the t-34 had was once again its ability to be produced in massive numbers. but to say the t-34 was better than the Tiger, King Tiger, Panther or even Elefant tanks is total bullshit

  • @UFCMania98 i didnt say the T-34 was better BUT the Germans MADE THE PANTHER AND TIGERS BECAUSE OF THE T-34...the T-34 came first....the Germans had to upgrade their tanks because it its superiority....and yes the Panther was the best tank of the war...The advantages of the T-34 were its sloping armor and wide treads...

  • @UFCMania98 the Elefant was a total waste of production

  • @aSuperbadassninja I have to correct myself, the Tigers and Panthers did and could take out t-34's from ranges over TWO kilometers. not only that, but they lit them up like a roman candle

  • @aSuperbadassninja I agree, Russia did more damage to Germany then the US and others. The US only fought Germany in like, 2 battles..... Russia caused Hitler to commit suicide :3

  • @hellcatdave1 ok germany's death was 60% russia and 40% western allies. Ever heard of the Pacific theater?

  • Comment removed

  • @aSuperbadassninja Russians couldn't do jack shit without Americans supplies. keep that in mind.

    and the  Western Allies did round the clock bombing on Germany. O ya and Russia only fought on one side of the world during the war the USA was Every where

  • @Dogmeat1950

    Read some history.

    Firstly-lend lease was ineffective support for USSR(only 4-5% of soviet industry)

    Secondly-eastern front was the longest in Second World War(thousands kilometers of war and destruction,you should look at the maps of WWII),this is means that USSR forces was every too.Most of Wehrmacht armies fighted with Russia.

  • @MultiVerWolf The most important support provided by the lend lease program was non-AFV vehicle, in the region of 300,000 trucks, jeeps and weapon carriers were supplied over a 4 year period. But also account for 16% tank and 12% of self-propelled gun production - So about 1 in 8 fighting vehicles were of foreign origin, including at least 1 guards corp of Emmchas (sherman).

    The original BTR (46 I think) is a copy of the American half track series using a 6x4 wheel drive in lieu of the track

  • @steeldog6

    I can afree with something,BUT:

    1)During WWII USSR used more than 58000 tanks.16 percen tanks?USA sended to USSR only about 4000...And also was another allyes,which are used lend lease program,so America could not gave to the Soviet Union too many heavy units...

    2)But there are many jeeps,trucks(as you already wrote)were used in WWII

    3)Now about BTR.If you mean Studebaker US6,I think you right,because it was much better than Russian trucks...

  • @MultiVerWolf - BTR 140 actually my error of remembering ;) 4x6 APC based on a GAZ truck copied from the US 6x6 and 4X6 trucks

    US Lend lease figures are in the region of just over 6000 tanks of all types received (being not lost at sea) and UK (incl Canadian production) in the region of 3500 tanks of all type. To this are further 1100 other armored vehicles (including half-tracks, the SU57 and M4 based GMC tank destroyers) from the US and some 2300 universal carriers from the British Empire.

  • @steeldog6

    much better than Russian tanks of 1941-1950 of course.

  • @aSuperbadassninja The Russians took all the Allied victories East of Berlin, this is true, but did nothing to the West, unsurprisingly.

  • @aSuperbadassninja for the mother land !!!

  • nice idiot

  • ak was based of the mp-44 german design

  • @romulux7

    No Internally they're completly different, only the concept of a select-fire, automatic rifle, firing an intermediate catridge was copied from the Germans.

  • Only the philosophy not the design.

  • She acted like it was going to explode in her face after he took it apart.

  • True, M-16 and AK-47 cannot be properly compared. Most important to note is that the AK-47 is a machine gun then rifle, while the M-16 is a rifle. What is the difference? IT has to do with the action of firing from open and closed bolt, which also decides the rifle's accuracy. M-16 is more accurate, but the AK-47 is reliable. AK has a better round while the M-16... can ... yeah.

    (This is coming from an American btw) Either way, once I can, I want both guns! Yay for Kalashnikov!!

  • well the round of the ak-47 has mor s