Ye Gods - the VISIGOTHS took Rome in 476 AD under Alaric. However, an emperor supposedly remained in control until 480AD. The Huns did not ever get to take Rome, but they came close, but this was when the Visigoths were allies with Rome (very temporary though). This was the end of the WESTERN Roman Empire. Constantinopolis (Constantinople) was the Eastern Roman capital, which did not fall until the end of the Medieval period.
no the huns dindt achieft to take rome the goths sacked rome and take rome and italy but the west roman empire was very weak it was the hole time sacked and taken and it was also weakend by black death that happend the same as by rome
Well, yeah, you're right, but not was taken for too much time, the visigothic army sacked the city for 3 days and leave the city. And they don't sieged the city, there were some slaves that the visigothic king sent to the Senate, that, they killed the guards of the doors and opened them.
@PinoPinoles mate, I think you got it the other way round. Huns were first barbarians to terrorise the city gates but it were the goths who finally sacked and took over Rome.
@Threepwoodsbeard No. The first barbarians that got to Rome (not counting he gauls aprox. 390 b.c.) were the Goths. The huns took Rome under Attila's command, but when he died, they left Rome. That was about 452 A.D.. The ones who finaly took Rome (the city) were the vandals in 476 A.D.. The goths only took Spain, the vandals Italy and north africa (the western empire's part), the franks took the actual territory of France and the saxons took Britannia (Britain).
@Threepwoodsbeard Oh, I forgot something. The goths got to Rome before Attila; in 410 (actually, that's the date when they entered the city, but they started the siege in 408 A.D.).
@Kriziak992 If you look Attila the Hun's biography in wikipedia, you shall find out that he (obviously) was a hun, and that his army actually got to Rome (but only for a short time).
rome was only defeated because of the black death, it weakend their empire so greatly, after msot was dead, the barbarians just took everythink they wished from the romans, stone, gold, silver, money, weapons and armour, everythink.
yes rome was saked manny times yes rome was partial to the signifigant stepping stones to the spread of catholisisim not chrisianity and not only that it was the romans who killed christ so why do u crazzy for the church say its the jews u idiots not to metion roman in roman jesus means josh and christ means masia im ik of ingnoarance his real name is joshou en joeseph
Without Rome Europe would have been ruled by barbarian warlords well past the time of Jesus, Jews would still be enlaved meaning no chrisitan or islam. We all still be worshiping pagans. The Modern world would not exist with Rome. Sure Rome had a bad side but it was because of them the modern world existed. There is a good and bad side to everything
so your basicly saying if god wanted europe to be christian-micah- the barbarians would have stoped him? people who after destroying rome went for eachother? while egypt a nation well united back earlier before rome was pushed aside by water? just cuz there was no rome doesnt mean there would be no christianity and it wouldnt affect islam because that originated in the middle east. also the western empire fell not the east so jews were safe. also the middle ages were babarians in heavy armor
Don't bring God into this thats not a valid arguement. The Roman Empire was instrumental in spreading Christianity across Europe. Before the spread Chrisitianity was under constant threat of being snuffed out and Islam recieved influences from Chrisitianity and Judaism. Its not like one day the Prophet Muhammad decided to found one of the world's largest religions
ok heres a valid arguement micah..the romans didnt spread christianity for the most part of christianity's exsistance under their empire they took christans to rome and killed them only after one emperor became christan did the carnage stop and when they did that rome was losing land, for the most part other people spread christanity all over the world even if rome had never been it would have happened.... oh and for the last part what is budism?
first this reanactment is false the goths were starving and neede food badly so they camped around rome choking the city from suppies the citizens were so hungry and miserable at 1 point they accepted anything to eat the old roman pride was gone and a citizen opened the gates minutes later goths stormed in but to their bad luk foung no food and moved on 3 days later, there was no army defending inside no legions and the only roman army tht tried to help was pushed back to ravenna by goths
one way you could do it is have a unit of archers whitle down 1 unit of foderati infantry to 1 a then make him walk up to the gate or someting like that.
1.The Legionnaires of Julius Caesar have been replaced by the Comitatenses(Or however you spell them),they're those guys at the begining who stand against that wave of horsemen
2.The garrison of Rome was so meager and weak,they ran off with the citizens of the city
actually western empire wasnt that weak. what made all these distruction is because it also fight against byzantinean empire in the other side of border that extraordinary weaken its strangth. then numidian and baduin at the africa, goth and franks on the north, huns push their attack from northeast. so is its old civil war ryval byzantinean. but it was still held on its own for another 60 years after the babarian invasion. for my opinion byzantinean play a dirty roll in the fall of roman.
first off in the last 60 years of roman ragime were completely exhausted during the long term civil war with local warlord that were once imperial soldier. and western goth invaded and sacked city rome that also gave a fatal wound to this weaken empire. slave rebel everywhere. and that doesnt count the forgien rebellion and babarian and byzantinean. later central government and rome senate ran off the money to keep professional soldier to protect the city. then that happan.
fuck u blueuser u dont know shyt about the byzantines they were da only 1s that tryed to help rome but they had their own probs in the mid east from the muslyms and shit so shut ur mouth cauz u dont no fuck shit bout nuttin bitch
Obviously you forgot that the Byzantines PAID their enemies just to go away.And they were fighting the Sassanids and Muslims.Plus the two empires never saw eye to eye(Due to land and religion),and not to mention the fact that the Byzantines RECONQUERED Rome during Justinian II reign.
By the way,if you want to be taken seriously in an educated debate.Learn proper grammar.
actually they didnt tear down the walls. Both the romans and goths were really starving so a citizen, probably a slave opened the gates and entered the eternal city but 3 days after they left cause they found no food but 750 years of roman culture were sacked or destroyed.
nah, look at us right now, do we live WORSE than roman at that time? every civilization had its lifespan. when it die you cant do anything. btw roman was destroyed by their own corruption instead defeated by goth.
actually do this divide your army into 2. The cavalry and the infantry. Hide the cavalry until one of his side flanks is exposed. then crush his flank.
@Warlord0567 good archers with very upgraded stat fire arrows and make sure the enemy is moving first u hit them from front when they not ur wasting ammo oh and get a few catipults
yes get ur caflre to get behind them and take out there solders when they trun uese 10 units to athake forword and send 5 units in about 5 mins then send the rest when or if they die and then u sholud win good luck
It was interesting to watch, but this wasn't how it really turned out. The Goths didn't break their way into the city; instead, the gates were thrown open to them from the inside after a lengthy siege that caused starvation.
I destroy all factions with greek cities :p
klo0tc 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey,everone,give you an exciting site --Seekcasual.C .ó.M---
Pls check it out.I think you will like it.
Thank you very much.
ken1989ize 2 months ago
Ye Gods - the VISIGOTHS took Rome in 476 AD under Alaric. However, an emperor supposedly remained in control until 480AD. The Huns did not ever get to take Rome, but they came close, but this was when the Visigoths were allies with Rome (very temporary though). This was the end of the WESTERN Roman Empire. Constantinopolis (Constantinople) was the Eastern Roman capital, which did not fall until the end of the Medieval period.
celticbattleaxe 3 months ago
@sorrypom Yes ,but after that, the Huns returned to Rome and took it, but Attila suddenly died, and they had to retreat.
PinoPinoles 6 months ago
I love how teh infatry actually stomring the walls is hunnic lol
dcsmith5100 1 year ago
How do you get to see the people of the town
maryboatner 1 year ago
@maryboatner yoo go to setlment details and thezn click view batlle map its boring though :p
Crazy0Jay0Dude0 10 months ago
The idiots at WMG strike again. Soon no one will be listening to their artists' music.
zoyclem 1 year ago
Well, actually it was not taken, it was only sacked by the goths, the ones who took it were the huns, isn't it?
PinoPinoles 2 years ago 5
no the huns dindt achieft to take rome the goths sacked rome and take rome and italy but the west roman empire was very weak it was the hole time sacked and taken and it was also weakend by black death that happend the same as by rome
phoenixking321 2 years ago
Well, yeah, you're right, but not was taken for too much time, the visigothic army sacked the city for 3 days and leave the city. And they don't sieged the city, there were some slaves that the visigothic king sent to the Senate, that, they killed the guards of the doors and opened them.
PinoPinoles 2 years ago
@PinoPinoles mate, I think you got it the other way round. Huns were first barbarians to terrorise the city gates but it were the goths who finally sacked and took over Rome.
Threepwoodsbeard 1 year ago
@Threepwoodsbeard No. The first barbarians that got to Rome (not counting he gauls aprox. 390 b.c.) were the Goths. The huns took Rome under Attila's command, but when he died, they left Rome. That was about 452 A.D.. The ones who finaly took Rome (the city) were the vandals in 476 A.D.. The goths only took Spain, the vandals Italy and north africa (the western empire's part), the franks took the actual territory of France and the saxons took Britannia (Britain).
PinoPinoles 1 year ago
@Threepwoodsbeard Oh, I forgot something. The goths got to Rome before Attila; in 410 (actually, that's the date when they entered the city, but they started the siege in 408 A.D.).
PinoPinoles 1 year ago
@PinoPinoles Oh yaeh! sorry mate, I just mixed the goths for vandals. thanks for the correction. back to the history books for me :)
Threepwoodsbeard 1 year ago
@Threepwoodsbeard No problem :D
PinoPinoles 1 year ago
@PinoPinoles Lol no.. Huns never made it into Italy soil.....
Kriziak992 6 months ago
@Kriziak992 If you look Attila the Hun's biography in wikipedia, you shall find out that he (obviously) was a hun, and that his army actually got to Rome (but only for a short time).
PinoPinoles 6 months ago
@Kriziak992 Well, perhaps they didn't took Rome, but they did actually set foot in Italian soil...
PinoPinoles 6 months ago
@PinoPinoles The Huns never got into Rome.
ajbenius 4 months ago
@ajbenius Of course they did, but they left almost immediatly.
PinoPinoles 4 months ago
@PinoPinoles They got to the wall, but then the pope negotiated with them and they left.
ajbenius 4 months ago
rome was only defeated because of the black death, it weakend their empire so greatly, after msot was dead, the barbarians just took everythink they wished from the romans, stone, gold, silver, money, weapons and armour, everythink.
darnocslew 2 years ago
yes rome was saked manny times yes rome was partial to the signifigant stepping stones to the spread of catholisisim not chrisianity and not only that it was the romans who killed christ so why do u crazzy for the church say its the jews u idiots not to metion roman in roman jesus means josh and christ means masia im ik of ingnoarance his real name is joshou en joeseph
StickIncorperated 2 years ago
no go and fuck off to mecca u worthless piece of shit,suck myy hairy sweaty nutsack
PrinceOfMalta1 2 years ago
didnt rome surrender the city and aldrec just sack it with little resistance? idk for sure jw
HADESRULE44 2 years ago
ya.... i think so.... Rome got sacked more then once
Rob7194 2 years ago
Probably ....
Easydollars 3 years ago
Whats a Barbarian. I think the world we live in Today is Barbaric. ????????
Easydollars 3 years ago 2
so true
sketchturner88 3 years ago
It's easy to say that while enjoying a peace barbarians never had.
seba4 3 years ago
F--K rome and its Empire. 1000s of years of
Taxing people to death, corruption, stealing,
etc etc. Just like today! Hey, its still Rome!
Easydollars 3 years ago 2
true
noobish1234 3 years ago
Without Rome Europe would have been ruled by barbarian warlords well past the time of Jesus, Jews would still be enlaved meaning no chrisitan or islam. We all still be worshiping pagans. The Modern world would not exist with Rome. Sure Rome had a bad side but it was because of them the modern world existed. There is a good and bad side to everything
micah9639 3 years ago
so your basicly saying if god wanted europe to be christian-micah- the barbarians would have stoped him? people who after destroying rome went for eachother? while egypt a nation well united back earlier before rome was pushed aside by water? just cuz there was no rome doesnt mean there would be no christianity and it wouldnt affect islam because that originated in the middle east. also the western empire fell not the east so jews were safe. also the middle ages were babarians in heavy armor
HADESRULE44 2 years ago
Don't bring God into this thats not a valid arguement. The Roman Empire was instrumental in spreading Christianity across Europe. Before the spread Chrisitianity was under constant threat of being snuffed out and Islam recieved influences from Chrisitianity and Judaism. Its not like one day the Prophet Muhammad decided to found one of the world's largest religions
micah9639 2 years ago
ok heres a valid arguement micah..the romans didnt spread christianity for the most part of christianity's exsistance under their empire they took christans to rome and killed them only after one emperor became christan did the carnage stop and when they did that rome was losing land, for the most part other people spread christanity all over the world even if rome had never been it would have happened.... oh and for the last part what is budism?
HADESRULE44 2 years ago
That was there even before Rome was a empire or a republic.
Ricky156 3 years ago
It's not just Rome, any organized group of people then and now are just the same. Human nature.
kaptenlemper 2 years ago
no rome kept them as slaves after a revolt to control jerusalem if not slaves then they were ruled harshly in short
HADESRULE44 2 years ago
look at the upgrades XD
lennydale92 3 years ago
Only peace that Romans knew were PAX ROMANA.
Centuries of wars, power struggle and very vad emperors who didn´t care of the state matters and liked only to party brought Rome down.
Example. If some barbarian tribe invaded Roman territory, no1 avenged Rome because there was no great military leader like Julius Caesar.
Maverick110290 3 years ago 6
i dont understand how the wall broke
punkzorr 3 years ago
They dug a tunnel until they reached the wall's foundations.
seba4 3 years ago
WEll made my friend love the video 5/5
emerelia2008 3 years ago
first this reanactment is false the goths were starving and neede food badly so they camped around rome choking the city from suppies the citizens were so hungry and miserable at 1 point they accepted anything to eat the old roman pride was gone and a citizen opened the gates minutes later goths stormed in but to their bad luk foung no food and moved on 3 days later, there was no army defending inside no legions and the only roman army tht tried to help was pushed back to ravenna by goths
Justinian43 3 years ago
Yes..... why many cities fall, either rebels or enemy factions cut off their food supply
emerelia2008 3 years ago
my point proven thank you mate
Justinian43 3 years ago
one way you could do it is have a unit of archers whitle down 1 unit of foderati infantry to 1 a then make him walk up to the gate or someting like that.
g0ndorian 3 years ago
dude what happend to the leigonaries there is no rome without leigonaries
Artherus1 3 years ago
1.The Legionnaires of Julius Caesar have been replaced by the Comitatenses(Or however you spell them),they're those guys at the begining who stand against that wave of horsemen
2.The garrison of Rome was so meager and weak,they ran off with the citizens of the city
AquaPhoenix2006 3 years ago
actually western empire wasnt that weak. what made all these distruction is because it also fight against byzantinean empire in the other side of border that extraordinary weaken its strangth. then numidian and baduin at the africa, goth and franks on the north, huns push their attack from northeast. so is its old civil war ryval byzantinean. but it was still held on its own for another 60 years after the babarian invasion. for my opinion byzantinean play a dirty roll in the fall of roman.
blueuser4000 3 years ago
Yeah,but in terms of withstanding a siege and sack of a city,anything less than enough soldiers to withstand it is "weak" in my book.
AquaPhoenix2006 3 years ago
first off in the last 60 years of roman ragime were completely exhausted during the long term civil war with local warlord that were once imperial soldier. and western goth invaded and sacked city rome that also gave a fatal wound to this weaken empire. slave rebel everywhere. and that doesnt count the forgien rebellion and babarian and byzantinean. later central government and rome senate ran off the money to keep professional soldier to protect the city. then that happan.
blueuser4000 3 years ago
fuck u blueuser u dont know shyt about the byzantines they were da only 1s that tryed to help rome but they had their own probs in the mid east from the muslyms and shit so shut ur mouth cauz u dont no fuck shit bout nuttin bitch
wtfguru 3 years ago
Obviously you forgot that the Byzantines PAID their enemies just to go away.And they were fighting the Sassanids and Muslims.Plus the two empires never saw eye to eye(Due to land and religion),and not to mention the fact that the Byzantines RECONQUERED Rome during Justinian II reign.
By the way,if you want to be taken seriously in an educated debate.Learn proper grammar.
AquaPhoenix2006 3 years ago
actually they didnt tear down the walls. Both the romans and goths were really starving so a citizen, probably a slave opened the gates and entered the eternal city but 3 days after they left cause they found no food but 750 years of roman culture were sacked or destroyed.
Justinian43 3 years ago
nah, look at us right now, do we live WORSE than roman at that time? every civilization had its lifespan. when it die you cant do anything. btw roman was destroyed by their own corruption instead defeated by goth.
blueuser4000 3 years ago
ur exactly rite rome wasnt built in a day or fell in a day it took two centuries of unrest inside and outside of it to bring it down
Justinian43 3 years ago
actually do this divide your army into 2. The cavalry and the infantry. Hide the cavalry until one of his side flanks is exposed. then crush his flank.
Justinian43 3 years ago
can u help me?
My cousin uses 20 units of spartans
I cant defeat them
Is there a way???
swdanhvu 4 years ago
hit them from the back, hard, very hard probly with huge elephants, and lots of them.
Warlord0567 4 years ago
@Warlord0567 like u sed elephants u should also use horses from the back of the elephants to back up the elephants
armymankiller228 1 year ago
@Warlord0567 good archers with very upgraded stat fire arrows and make sure the enemy is moving first u hit them from front when they not ur wasting ammo oh and get a few catipults
bieberboyify 4 months ago
@Warlord0567 Or pour missiles onto them from the flanks or rear
BARGI911 1 week ago
if he uses 20 units of spartans hes a cheater and does not play RTW properly if he plays with 20 units of spartans.
if he dosent do it use horse archers or carthages sacred band (u might beat them if ur lucky)and use slingers
shootie894 4 years ago
yes get ur caflre to get behind them and take out there solders when they trun uese 10 units to athake forword and send 5 units in about 5 mins then send the rest when or if they die and then u sholud win good luck
rathmulin 3 years ago
It's not cheating moron, it's stupidity. Just outflank them, get some elephants/ongagers.
lunthegun 3 years ago
@swdanhvu also can use archers
TheRomanRuler 1 year ago
@swdanhvu outflank them. Orbetter yet, set the money battle to low so he can not field 20 units of spartans
SlyDessertFox 7 months ago
@swdanhvu go behind them with war elephants...then charge the war elephants right into them...the spartans will die...90% sure Lol
mcbmc1 7 months ago
@swdanhvu throw stones at them ^_^
ChaosShadoWolfe 7 months ago
It was interesting to watch, but this wasn't how it really turned out. The Goths didn't break their way into the city; instead, the gates were thrown open to them from the inside after a lengthy siege that caused starvation.
TWKang 4 years ago
yes you are right there, thats what happened in history, but this was a multyplayer battle, and had no other way of getting into the city
Warlord0567 4 years ago