baguazhang, funny thing is that the gun control nazis always like to say all european countries have gun control, even though it is completely false. Quick example is that every Swiss adult is required to own a gun, preferably an assault weapon. Yearly, they have to receive training at a firing range.
Right to bare arms: Great, when the weather is warm
Right to arm bears: You would make invincible bears that would be raping our churches and burning our women! They already have bulletproof vests, don't give them guns!
All you guys talking about how we wouldn't last against the military for a revolution. I don't think that our soldiers well atleast most of them anyway would want to harm their own people.
Cole, no one here is saying that we wouldn't last against the military. However, people do say that in debates in general and this is usually a cowardly European mindset. Whether or not we'd survive against the government is irrelevant to the debate. That's what I always tell them.
Obviously few people are going to support civilians owning missiles, and hopefully no one will support them owning nukes, but owning guns is fine and should be a protected right.
Many people say that the constitution guarantees the right to own guns. These are the same people who tend to say the constitution should not be changed. But the constitution does not say "guns," it says "arms." Missiles are arms.
What people refuse to acknowledge is that the right was written when we were using muskets. Basically, gun right lobbyists are manipulating the const. If you want guns, change it to say guns, else let people own missiles and nukes.
I wouldn't disagree much with that. Some might say it's hypocritical to support rewording the constitution to substitute "gun" for "arms" while at the same time defending the constitution, but I look more towards the intention of the founding fathers who simply wanted the citizens to have the means to defend themselves. Guns, including rifles, and armor more or less fit the bill.
Your intentions are honorable, but I see problems with wanting to preserve the const and original intentions.
The perspective of the founding farthers is from 200+ years ago, as such the const is meant to deal with that world; not our world. Thomas Jefferson himself said that the const should be rewritten every 19 yrs.
The const should be made to accommodate our current time, tech, and perspective; throw out what no longer makes sense, keep what does. Jefferson understood this.
really ... SAY there are people asking for thumbs up or there are people stalking profile channels just to say "first", with a handgun you can get rid of em idiots by shooting at your computer screen.
@yakyakyak69 Quite truly it has two parts, That for a militia to be well regulated it must have weapons, there for peoples rights to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not that Militias rights to bear arms shall not be infringed, so that peoples rights shall not be infringed so they may form militias. People have the right to arms for practice, hunting and anything that is lawful including the formation of militias. :P
@celonsus Correct! It was the Militias who protected the States from invasion, Federal usurpation of power and the centralized tyranny of the majority.
The big LIE is the word "regulated".
Statists tell us that means gov't regulation. That is a LIE!
Our founders used the the term "regulated" meaning "disciplined" or "trained". In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that "the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."
notice at the beginning his name is Barney Ballsack
blakerulzz 2 days ago
I support the right to arm bears.
Joyhova 4 days ago
raping ur churches and burning your wemon
a serious problems
dirtycurty121 2 weeks ago
5 people hate guns damn nigers
ThaSouthernBackwoods 2 weeks ago
skitscape
conorfarm3r 3 weeks ago
I want that song!!!
LoewenPforte 3 weeks ago
BABY TESTICLE SEKKIN BULLET!!
blackpeopleyea1 3 weeks ago
church rape is a seirous problem in the united states
MountainJewHD 3 weeks ago
or protection... i mean... if thats just me idk...
neilb96 4 weeks ago
Epic Music XD
LusoryLuna 1 month ago
sounded like some motor head at first
YOMUDAWUZHERE 1 month ago
Lol, theyre on PCP
iceskull333 1 month ago
"that way the deer wont be runnin around with your daughter anymore, filling her head with ridiculous ideas and corrupting her character"
SummernlightningUSA 2 months ago 5
raping your chucrhes burning your women LOL
apllehotsauce 2 months ago 5
8=D----☻
3PICSNOWBOARDING 2 months ago
Dark Humor
flyguy373 2 months ago
invincible bears lmao
D3RANG3Dduelist 2 months ago 5
Do i need to spell it out for you.........
JT1719 2 months ago
well that was disturban mostly because im watch ing my bros baby......
GavinL1234 2 months ago
wow, I mean, that was everything bad about both stances in the subject.
MrChupacabra1995 2 months ago
LMAO
MrChupacabra1995 2 months ago
The Biker had a synthetic baby skull
NoMrFluffy 2 months ago
i support banning guns to encourage creativity in murder
popcornbebop 2 months ago 43
love the ending
themostdemonic 2 months ago
We shouldn't ban guns so that invincible bears won't rape our churches and burn our women. Think about it...
Squiremjr 2 months ago
wait the camera person's name is Brian? Like the one on Mall Bitches?
devlkiller0 2 months ago
Jerrys killed two people now lol
realboarder09 2 months ago
Rapeing ur churches??
fudgeballs87 2 months ago
He said the bullet targets the nearest baby skull. He shoots at the biker and it hits the baby farther away.
TreyAndNateStudios 2 months ago
@TreyAndNateStudios thats the joke
nelsonr12 2 months ago
baguazhang, funny thing is that the gun control nazis always like to say all european countries have gun control, even though it is completely false. Quick example is that every Swiss adult is required to own a gun, preferably an assault weapon. Yearly, they have to receive training at a firing range.
WestSkier11 2 months ago
Hey jerry ! From the hunting accident skit hahaha
Fallensky17 2 months ago
EmbraceTheThunder u racist turd
hoodedmexican 2 months ago
EmbraceTheThunder u racist retard
hoodedmexican 2 months ago
I can't believe this show got me to laugh at a baby getting shot.
AustinDoggie 2 months ago
You can rape a church?!?!
TheLaurelbug 3 months ago 2
@TheLaurelbug
If the priests can do it, why can't we?
EmbraceTheThunder 3 months ago
@EmbraceTheThunder
True dat!
TheLaurelbug 3 months ago
barney ballsuck
zion2train 3 months ago
he sais skull weird. skoll
donavon 3 months ago
something tells me that baby had it coming
smoqimi 3 months ago 6
The End
Is an epic
fail.Stupid
hunter!
TH3awesomeVID30 3 months ago
"People don't kill people with giant boulders!" "They will if you take away their assault rifles". Lolol fuckin' epic.
MyNameIsNotBrad 3 months ago 2
Lol!
Avadakedavra989 3 months ago
seriously? can no one spell invincible correctly? the level of stupidity online never ceases to amaze me.
thatwasntfunny1 3 months ago 2
Raping your churches Burning your Women! :D
Raping your women burning your churches. lol
dude101208 3 months ago
Lol i love it when he is explaining the baby skull seeking bullets the host is head down on the desk
luxraylover1234 3 months ago
3 people got shot by baby skull seeking bullets as children
beowulf860 3 months ago
fighting with southern people is like trying to fight with a 5 year old
kankuro876 3 months ago
@kankuro876 wrong.
SkorpianPresents 2 months ago
Raping your churches, burning your women, LOL.
pengy626 3 months ago 5
Woah...um..
PanchoLikesFood 3 months ago
you dont want invinsable bears running around raping your churches burning your women
marshallowns 3 months ago 2
So Brian got promoted from MTV to a political debate show?
felixfreak 3 months ago
raping your churches and burning your women
hollowflame2 3 months ago 127
@hollowflame2 and knocking everything over! :)
EgilFearFactor 2 months ago
@hollowflame2 y r u talking about my Saturday nights
deadpool514 2 months ago
Is that what you want? Invincible bears running around, raping you Churches, burning your women?
no sir, the last thing I would want is for my Church to get raped
litlemidget 3 months ago 4
Right to bear arms: Debatable
Right to bare arms: Great, when the weather is warm
Right to arm bears: You would make invincible bears that would be raping our churches and burning our women! They already have bulletproof vests, don't give them guns!
NoNameHasBeenFound 3 months ago 5
@NoNameHasBeenFound In Soviet Russia is Right to Arm Bears!
SgtAwesome6 3 months ago
@NoNameHasBeenFound right to bear arms : undebatable. period.
Grunt922 3 months ago
All you guys talking about how we wouldn't last against the military for a revolution. I don't think that our soldiers well atleast most of them anyway would want to harm their own people.
coledehmer 3 months ago
@coledehmer
Cole, no one here is saying that we wouldn't last against the military. However, people do say that in debates in general and this is usually a cowardly European mindset. Whether or not we'd survive against the government is irrelevant to the debate. That's what I always tell them.
baguazhang2 3 months ago
Raping your Churches, Burning your Women...
v2quickness 3 months ago
right to bear arms hahahaha
WAYtoomuchbacon 3 months ago
Lmao at the end
SpelignErrir 3 months ago
"Raping our churches, burning our women." xD
GiGaPLExxx128 3 months ago 2
"...right to bare arms."
Such bullshit. This right is not protected anymore.
The government has made it illegal for civilians to purchase and own nuclear missiles. I mean what the hell?
My right to own missiles is protected by the constitution! Why can't the government understand this?
EmbraceTheThunder 3 months ago
@EmbraceTheThunder
Obviously few people are going to support civilians owning missiles, and hopefully no one will support them owning nukes, but owning guns is fine and should be a protected right.
baguazhang2 3 months ago
@baguazhang2
You miss the point.
Many people say that the constitution guarantees the right to own guns. These are the same people who tend to say the constitution should not be changed. But the constitution does not say "guns," it says "arms." Missiles are arms.
What people refuse to acknowledge is that the right was written when we were using muskets. Basically, gun right lobbyists are manipulating the const. If you want guns, change it to say guns, else let people own missiles and nukes.
EmbraceTheThunder 3 months ago
@EmbraceTheThunder
I wouldn't disagree much with that. Some might say it's hypocritical to support rewording the constitution to substitute "gun" for "arms" while at the same time defending the constitution, but I look more towards the intention of the founding fathers who simply wanted the citizens to have the means to defend themselves. Guns, including rifles, and armor more or less fit the bill.
baguazhang2 3 months ago
@baguazhang2
Your intentions are honorable, but I see problems with wanting to preserve the const and original intentions.
The perspective of the founding farthers is from 200+ years ago, as such the const is meant to deal with that world; not our world. Thomas Jefferson himself said that the const should be rewritten every 19 yrs.
The const should be made to accommodate our current time, tech, and perspective; throw out what no longer makes sense, keep what does. Jefferson understood this.
EmbraceTheThunder 3 months ago
@EmbraceTheThunder ........who owns missles and nukes besides the government O.o
ChaosSpage 3 months ago
@ChaosSpage
It's hyperbole, man.
EmbraceTheThunder 3 months ago
Rapin your churches, burnin your women
CrazyItalian7469 3 months ago
HEY NEXT COMMENTER
YOU GONNA GET A BEATDOWN
Mynameisnotooo 3 months ago
Yeah I couldnt agree more! Down at the tralier the park they just took away all of my puppy bombs. They were hell of fun on Halloween.
elvenmage271 3 months ago
Wow, no gun control rants/debates? This gets a thumbs up.
lot24 4 months ago 104
@lot24 why should we debate, the video proofed that guns are needed
F3LDK0CH 1 month ago
thats fucked up
mrp1kles 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bears; raping your churches, burning your women
NicholasX9 4 months ago
Comment removed
NicholasX9 4 months ago 2
I love how he was about to beat him up in public with witnesses everywhere.
wwwTheHardDriverscom 4 months ago
3:16 loosens tie
3:26 it's tightened
cuz that's what i do before i get the shit beaten outta me.
mAdmAn948 4 months ago
Tell me why, exactly, a hunter might need a NAAAAAAAAIIIIIL GUUUUUUUUUN?
monkeyonfire0 4 months ago
my gun control is using two hands.
gravehalo 4 months ago 2
Rapin your churches and burnin your women!!
krackerhoofd 4 months ago
"People don't kill people with giant boulders"
I do....am I not a person? O.e
MrGonzales0303 4 months ago
barney ballsack lol
JustinSTUPIDITY 4 months ago
raping your churches! burnin your children! lol
lolzbolz4 4 months ago
people who are against the second amendment are people who don't know why they even made it an amendment.
its there so if the government stops giving the people their rights we have the power for another revolution.
ppp9922 4 months ago
i hate it when people rape my churches
TheGreatHeroKing 4 months ago
lol this is supposed to be funny but some of the things they say r true
USMCB4MF 4 months ago
Man will kill man no matter what!!!
sparuto117 4 months ago
invincible
Trouter92 4 months ago
rapeing your curches burnin ur women
theuntamedenchalada 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Soviet Russia, warehouse abondan u
MrWitey 7 months ago
really ... SAY there are people asking for thumbs up or there are people stalking profile channels just to say "first", with a handgun you can get rid of em idiots by shooting at your computer screen.
RasenShuriken003 7 months ago
@RasenShuriken003 i love your comment
metalrocks19737 6 months ago
Host: "People don't kill people with giant boulders!"
Hunter: "They will if you take away their assasult rifle."
The hunter... has an EXCELLENT point, they probably would.
GreenWulf17 8 months ago
And America Is Safe
jdsacdc 8 months ago
I support the 2nd amendment. guns are here, to protect us from government tyrrany, not hunting.
polske322 1 year ago
You can only find invinsable bears in Canada.
Schylige 1 year ago 70
@Schylige invincible.
love2punk 4 months ago
@Schylige its invincible not invisible. invincible means you cant die. invisible means you can't see what is invisible
pookies21 4 months ago
@Schylige *Invincible
Severepwner 3 months ago
@Schylige eh
MrMasta23 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Soviet Russia, church rape you! (and in every catholic church, too)
hiruma0101 1 year ago 46
@hiruma0101 were in america
japimportssuck 8 months ago
@hiruma0101 im catholic and thats offensive. just kidding. teehee!
xsbsp 5 months ago
@hiruma0101 Its funny because russia dosent and the catholic church does!
davidhatethegraek 4 months ago
@hiruma0101 you mean
In mother Russia(soviet Russia w/e) YOU rape church
shermonruler 4 months ago
@hiruma0101 Soviet Russia jokes are fucking retarded now.
commenter12100 4 months ago
Have fun defending yourself from an AC130 with your pump-action, bro.
rac000n 1 year ago 4
The 2nd Amendment was about the people's natural right to defend themselves FROM gov't. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with hunting.
Hello... "necessary for a FREE State..." Free from federal tyranny.
Stop confusing the subject! Google "2a for for the USA" and learn something.
yakyakyak69 1 year ago
@yakyakyak69 Quite truly it has two parts, That for a militia to be well regulated it must have weapons, there for peoples rights to bear arms shall not be infringed. Not that Militias rights to bear arms shall not be infringed, so that peoples rights shall not be infringed so they may form militias. People have the right to arms for practice, hunting and anything that is lawful including the formation of militias. :P
celonsus 8 months ago
@celonsus Correct! It was the Militias who protected the States from invasion, Federal usurpation of power and the centralized tyranny of the majority.
The big LIE is the word "regulated".
Statists tell us that means gov't regulation. That is a LIE!
Our founders used the the term "regulated" meaning "disciplined" or "trained". In Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that "the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training."
yakyakyak69 8 months ago