@FightOn2VICTORY I'm a Notre dame fan. Die hard. We have 11 hall of famers. And currently Notre dame is way better than USC. But the other was a dick. Go Notre dame
Shows the school of USC nothing but cheaters. USC had there ass beat that game. They are OVER RATED they got there ass beat last night and tried to do the push push again you fucken cheaters I'm glad Notre Dame beat your asses. Your clock person was trying to cheat too. USC=CHEATERS
you think that the bush push was a bad no call? what about the vince young's knee down no call? what about reggie bush's forward pass no call? we can all bitch all day. get over it!
but ur forgetting one thing. We are beating USC in the rivalry ND has 42 wins USC has 32 and their are 5 ties. So yeah ur wrong. We also have the most bowl wins out of anyone.
Yeah, and you haven't won a bowl game in over a decade and a half. And you haven't had a Heisman winner in, what, 20 years? And you were 3-9 last year. And the year before you only got to a BCS game because you were Notre Dame, not because you were any good.
Well i will agree that it has been a while since we've won a bowl game or had a heisman. But can you answer this question for me? How many bowl games (including National Titles) and heismans do we have in our school? And we went to the BCS game because we were good, what you said makes no logical sense at all.
And how many have you won lately? You want to discuss ancient history, be my guest. But bringing up dusty bowl wins when you finish a season 3-9 and lose to Navy for the first time since the Kennedy Administration just makes you sound like a blathering idiot. And you went to the BCS games because of that stupid rule the BCS has that lets you in, not because you were any good. A good team beats its major rivals, not get humiliated by them. Try actually BEATING USC before claiming to be better.
Doesn't matter how many we have won lately. All time is what matters. Those are the statistics people look at. And yeah we finished 3-9 last year but we were 10-3 the year before, which is why we got the the BSC game. Their is no rule that will "let" us in when we finish the season with only 3 losses. And we have beat USC and are better, check our wins and our losses playing USC, we are beating you by ten games. When USC comes ahead of us in our rivalry, then i will shut up, but that wont happen
The BCS has a rule saying that the Irish are allowed in if they're ranked 8 or better (since you're too scared to join a conference and be forced to play against actual college teams). The pitiful showing you had against LSU (and Ohio State the year before) is proof enough you didn't belong. And even when USC overtakes the Irish, I know you Whinin Irish fans too well. You'll STILL be chanting about the championship you won a century ago, or whatever. Try winning a bowl game this decade.
Yes but do you think its easy to finish in the top 8? And i can admit that LSU and Ohio State are better the Notre Dame because they are. But that still doesnt change the fact that USC got their asses kicked by those two teams. (Or if it wasnt LSU then it was texas but it was still in a bowl game.)And when we do win a bowl game soon I will remember to rub it in on all of you idiotic USC fans, who dont have a past or a present to boast about. At least Notre Dame fans can boast about something.
A 3 point loss in the last few second doesn't count as an ass kicking, unlike that Sugar Bowl you didn't show up for. And it's definitely easier to finish in the top 8 when the media idiots are hyping you every minute. And we're actually tied with you for Heisman winners, dumbfuck. USC has a proud past, and a proud present (being in six straight BCS games with a 5-1 record, along with 3 Heisman winners this decade is pretty impressive). However, you're doing a hell of a job in sounding ignorant.
I wasnt talking about Heisman winners, that shouldnt even count since USC is pathetic enough to pay their players. Im talking about Bowl games and our rivalry standings retard. And what is this proud past that you speak of? And your present isnt exactly swell either. You lost the last few games to teams such as Texas and Ohio State. I dont think that would be 5-1 now would it? Another USC idiot trying to boast about his pathetic team that has to pay players to come with them.
Yeah, 'cause no Domer would do such a thing *cough*Hornung*cough* And when did USC lose to Ohio State? YOU lost to Ohio State in the Fiesta Bowl during Weis's first year.
2002: Win over Iowa
2003: Win over Michigan
2004: Win over Oklahoma
2005: 3 point loss to Texas
2006: Win over Michigan
2007: Win over Illinois
Looks like 5-1 to me. Please learn to do math, or at the very least look this stuff up before sounding like an ignorant fool.
Hm.. seems that you know how to use the internet and that i was wrong. But it still doesnt change the fact that Notre Dame is overall better (according to the statistics of our rivalry) and that USC has to stoop as low as to pay their players to become good.
Yeah, it's all because they pay, that must be it. Has nothing to do with the fact that they got great coaches and recruiters. Leinart, Tatupu, Malaluga, Bush, White, Jarrett, Smith, all those guys got paid, that's why they were good. Has nothing to do with talent. And another reason USC gets good players? The guys get to come to Los Angeles, not some snoresville like Tuscaloosa or South Bend. That sure does sound like logic to me.
But you dont think that for a second that if it were down to getting paid to go to college and get an education vs. not getting paid to go to college that those guys would chose to not get paid? And the only one out of those group of people that you named that are good is probably Lofa Tatupu. Leinart and Bush havent done much of anything in the league. Let alone the rest of those guys.
Yeah, because every Notre Dame player has been 100% committed to their education. Don't quit on Leinart yet though, quarterbacks usually take awhile to develop (Eli Manning?). LenDale White had a 1000 yard season, Smith made a bunch of clutch players for a Super Bowl champion, Malaluga isn't even in the league yet, and Bush was on a team decimated with injuries. Jarrett hasn't done much, but then again, neither has Golden Boy Brady Quinn.
Yes Quinn hasnt done much at all in the league, but as you said yourself, it takes a while for a QB to develop. As for Smith he's never been talked about when ive watched football, so he must not be to great.
Actually Bettis isn't in the Hall of Fame yet. He needs to be retired for five years to be eligible. Tuck's a good player, helped shut down the Pats in the Super Bowl, and Montana, well, I don't think he needs an introduction.
My friend died last year from chain letters repost this or she will come and kill you every time u here a ring in your ear she will make your life shorter and shorter repost this to 10 other videos
you can push as long as the player with the ball is not being grappled or tackled. If you watch the video again, you'll see that Ruggie shoves Leinart before he is being tackled.
yaaaa...the clip and logic bind together and collectively say otherwise. Watch again. Leinart was stopped near-cold until bush (benches 335) bashed him with a pretty solid shot in the back.
How do you get a notre dame graduate off your porch? Pay for the pizza. Trojans kill the leprechauns.
Uscrocks2010 3 weeks ago
USC = GREATNESS
packercountry323 2 months ago
@FightOn2VICTORY I'm a Notre dame fan. Die hard. We have 11 hall of famers. And currently Notre dame is way better than USC. But the other was a dick. Go Notre dame
MrFufumasher 5 months ago
Greatest college game my ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fuckin Reggie Bush will burn in hell for being a cheap ass football player and USC will be nuked!
hotbhive 1 year ago
Shows the school of USC nothing but cheaters. USC had there ass beat that game. They are OVER RATED they got there ass beat last night and tried to do the push push again you fucken cheaters I'm glad Notre Dame beat your asses. Your clock person was trying to cheat too. USC=CHEATERS
kylenuzh 1 year ago
Hahaha The Bush Push!!
ArebAlo08 1 year ago
you think that the bush push was a bad no call? what about the vince young's knee down no call? what about reggie bush's forward pass no call? we can all bitch all day. get over it!
1usc2 3 years ago 9
fuck this video
this is billy church
derekjames80 3 years ago
if u look at the play Reggie Bush is tackling Leinhart into the TD. Which is an illegal play. I dont lie both schools but thats the rules
marshallmock 3 years ago
thats a new rule
Jakeh211 3 years ago
Well, we can all agree on one thing:
ND SUCKS!!!
uscbeatnd 3 years ago
but ur forgetting one thing. We are beating USC in the rivalry ND has 42 wins USC has 32 and their are 5 ties. So yeah ur wrong. We also have the most bowl wins out of anyone.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
Yeah, and you haven't won a bowl game in over a decade and a half. And you haven't had a Heisman winner in, what, 20 years? And you were 3-9 last year. And the year before you only got to a BCS game because you were Notre Dame, not because you were any good.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
Well i will agree that it has been a while since we've won a bowl game or had a heisman. But can you answer this question for me? How many bowl games (including National Titles) and heismans do we have in our school? And we went to the BCS game because we were good, what you said makes no logical sense at all.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
And how many have you won lately? You want to discuss ancient history, be my guest. But bringing up dusty bowl wins when you finish a season 3-9 and lose to Navy for the first time since the Kennedy Administration just makes you sound like a blathering idiot. And you went to the BCS games because of that stupid rule the BCS has that lets you in, not because you were any good. A good team beats its major rivals, not get humiliated by them. Try actually BEATING USC before claiming to be better.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
Doesn't matter how many we have won lately. All time is what matters. Those are the statistics people look at. And yeah we finished 3-9 last year but we were 10-3 the year before, which is why we got the the BSC game. Their is no rule that will "let" us in when we finish the season with only 3 losses. And we have beat USC and are better, check our wins and our losses playing USC, we are beating you by ten games. When USC comes ahead of us in our rivalry, then i will shut up, but that wont happen
Zakyr443 3 years ago
The BCS has a rule saying that the Irish are allowed in if they're ranked 8 or better (since you're too scared to join a conference and be forced to play against actual college teams). The pitiful showing you had against LSU (and Ohio State the year before) is proof enough you didn't belong. And even when USC overtakes the Irish, I know you Whinin Irish fans too well. You'll STILL be chanting about the championship you won a century ago, or whatever. Try winning a bowl game this decade.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
Yes but do you think its easy to finish in the top 8? And i can admit that LSU and Ohio State are better the Notre Dame because they are. But that still doesnt change the fact that USC got their asses kicked by those two teams. (Or if it wasnt LSU then it was texas but it was still in a bowl game.)And when we do win a bowl game soon I will remember to rub it in on all of you idiotic USC fans, who dont have a past or a present to boast about. At least Notre Dame fans can boast about something.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
A 3 point loss in the last few second doesn't count as an ass kicking, unlike that Sugar Bowl you didn't show up for. And it's definitely easier to finish in the top 8 when the media idiots are hyping you every minute. And we're actually tied with you for Heisman winners, dumbfuck. USC has a proud past, and a proud present (being in six straight BCS games with a 5-1 record, along with 3 Heisman winners this decade is pretty impressive). However, you're doing a hell of a job in sounding ignorant.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
I wasnt talking about Heisman winners, that shouldnt even count since USC is pathetic enough to pay their players. Im talking about Bowl games and our rivalry standings retard. And what is this proud past that you speak of? And your present isnt exactly swell either. You lost the last few games to teams such as Texas and Ohio State. I dont think that would be 5-1 now would it? Another USC idiot trying to boast about his pathetic team that has to pay players to come with them.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
Yeah, 'cause no Domer would do such a thing *cough*Hornung*cough* And when did USC lose to Ohio State? YOU lost to Ohio State in the Fiesta Bowl during Weis's first year.
2002: Win over Iowa
2003: Win over Michigan
2004: Win over Oklahoma
2005: 3 point loss to Texas
2006: Win over Michigan
2007: Win over Illinois
Looks like 5-1 to me. Please learn to do math, or at the very least look this stuff up before sounding like an ignorant fool.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
Hm.. seems that you know how to use the internet and that i was wrong. But it still doesnt change the fact that Notre Dame is overall better (according to the statistics of our rivalry) and that USC has to stoop as low as to pay their players to become good.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
Yeah, it's all because they pay, that must be it. Has nothing to do with the fact that they got great coaches and recruiters. Leinart, Tatupu, Malaluga, Bush, White, Jarrett, Smith, all those guys got paid, that's why they were good. Has nothing to do with talent. And another reason USC gets good players? The guys get to come to Los Angeles, not some snoresville like Tuscaloosa or South Bend. That sure does sound like logic to me.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
But you dont think that for a second that if it were down to getting paid to go to college and get an education vs. not getting paid to go to college that those guys would chose to not get paid? And the only one out of those group of people that you named that are good is probably Lofa Tatupu. Leinart and Bush havent done much of anything in the league. Let alone the rest of those guys.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
Yeah, because every Notre Dame player has been 100% committed to their education. Don't quit on Leinart yet though, quarterbacks usually take awhile to develop (Eli Manning?). LenDale White had a 1000 yard season, Smith made a bunch of clutch players for a Super Bowl champion, Malaluga isn't even in the league yet, and Bush was on a team decimated with injuries. Jarrett hasn't done much, but then again, neither has Golden Boy Brady Quinn.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
Yes Quinn hasnt done much at all in the league, but as you said yourself, it takes a while for a QB to develop. As for Smith he's never been talked about when ive watched football, so he must not be to great.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
how bout jason tuck, maybe hall of famer jerome bettis or joe montana?
lancerbryan 3 years ago
Actually Bettis isn't in the Hall of Fame yet. He needs to be retired for five years to be eligible. Tuck's a good player, helped shut down the Pats in the Super Bowl, and Montana, well, I don't think he needs an introduction.
R8erNation636 3 years ago
How about Anthony Munoz, Bruce Mathews, Marcus Allen, "The Juice", Ronnie Lott, or any of USC's 12 NFL Hall of Famers. (That leads all schools)
FightOn2VICTORY 3 years ago
joe montana> usc
lancerbryan 3 years ago
USC>NOTRE DAME
FightOn2VICTORY 3 years ago
@FightOn2VICTORY USC fans like it in the butt
hotbhive 1 year ago
@hotbhive That's cute. How long did it take you to come up with that?
FightOn2VICTORY 1 year ago
@lancerbryan haha... agreed.
somedudewithvideos 1 year ago
We can also all agree that Notre Dame is better then USC, just check the statistics.
Zakyr443 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My friend died last year from chain letters repost this or she will come and kill you every time u here a ring in your ear she will make your life shorter and shorter repost this to 10 other videos
danitink1 4 years ago
you can push as long as the player with the ball is not being grappled or tackled. If you watch the video again, you'll see that Ruggie shoves Leinart before he is being tackled.
Redallstar1 4 years ago
Yep
kobraf150 3 years ago
im so sad no bush push
uscfanalec 4 years ago
any one that plays football knows refs never call that "push"a penalty its a dumb rule thats not even inforced
RGUTIERREZ54 4 years ago
college football's greatest rivalry? one of the best, not THE best
kmir224 4 years ago
I second this comment.
AftermathSpectre 4 years ago
yea, it still didnt matter.
Randomnoobi 5 years ago
yaaaa...the clip and logic bind together and collectively say otherwise. Watch again. Leinart was stopped near-cold until bush (benches 335) bashed him with a pretty solid shot in the back.
Viwithingor84 4 years ago
no bush push this year
Tolan04 5 years ago