Added: 5 years ago
From: mdonaldson
Views: 18,529
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How do you get a notre dame graduate off your porch? Pay for the pizza. Trojans kill the leprechauns.

  • USC = GREATNESS

  • @FightOn2VICTORY I'm a Notre dame fan. Die hard. We have 11 hall of famers. And currently Notre dame is way better than USC. But the other was a dick. Go Notre dame

  • Greatest college game my ass!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fuckin Reggie Bush will burn in hell for being a cheap ass football player and USC will be nuked!

  • Shows the school of USC nothing but cheaters. USC had there ass beat that game. They are OVER RATED they got there ass beat last night and tried to do the push push again you fucken cheaters I'm glad Notre Dame beat your asses. Your clock person was trying to cheat too. USC=CHEATERS

  • Hahaha The Bush Push!!

  • you think that the bush push was a bad no call? what about the vince young's knee down no call? what about reggie bush's forward pass no call? we can all bitch all day. get over it!

  • fuck this video

    this is billy church

  • if u look at the play Reggie Bush is tackling Leinhart into the TD. Which is an illegal play. I dont lie both schools but thats the rules

  • thats a new rule

  • Well, we can all agree on one thing:

    ND SUCKS!!!

  • but ur forgetting one thing. We are beating USC in the rivalry ND has 42 wins USC has 32 and their are 5 ties. So yeah ur wrong. We also have the most bowl wins out of anyone.

  • Yeah, and you haven't won a bowl game in over a decade and a half. And you haven't had a Heisman winner in, what, 20 years? And you were 3-9 last year. And the year before you only got to a BCS game because you were Notre Dame, not because you were any good.

  • Well i will agree that it has been a while since we've won a bowl game or had a heisman. But can you answer this question for me? How many bowl games (including National Titles) and heismans do we have in our school? And we went to the BCS game because we were good, what you said makes no logical sense at all.

  • And how many have you won lately? You want to discuss ancient history, be my guest. But bringing up dusty bowl wins when you finish a season 3-9 and lose to Navy for the first time since the Kennedy Administration just makes you sound like a blathering idiot. And you went to the BCS games because of that stupid rule the BCS has that lets you in, not because you were any good. A good team beats its major rivals, not get humiliated by them. Try actually BEATING USC before claiming to be better.

  • Doesn't matter how many we have won lately. All time is what matters. Those are the statistics people look at. And yeah we finished 3-9 last year but we were 10-3 the year before, which is why we got the the BSC game. Their is no rule that will "let" us in when we finish the season with only 3 losses. And we have beat USC and are better, check our wins and our losses playing USC, we are beating you by ten games. When USC comes ahead of us in our rivalry, then i will shut up, but that wont happen

  • The BCS has a rule saying that the Irish are allowed in if they're ranked 8 or better (since you're too scared to join a conference and be forced to play against actual college teams). The pitiful showing you had against LSU (and Ohio State the year before) is proof enough you didn't belong. And even when USC overtakes the Irish, I know you Whinin Irish fans too well. You'll STILL be chanting about the championship you won a century ago, or whatever. Try winning a bowl game this decade.

  • Yes but do you think its easy to finish in the top 8? And i can admit that LSU and Ohio State are better the Notre Dame because they are. But that still doesnt change the fact that USC got their asses kicked by those two teams. (Or if it wasnt LSU then it was texas but it was still in a bowl game.)And when we do win a bowl game soon I will remember to rub it in on all of you idiotic USC fans, who dont have a past or a present to boast about. At least Notre Dame fans can boast about something.

  • A 3 point loss in the last few second doesn't count as an ass kicking, unlike that Sugar Bowl you didn't show up for. And it's definitely easier to finish in the top 8 when the media idiots are hyping you every minute. And we're actually tied with you for Heisman winners, dumbfuck. USC has a proud past, and a proud present (being in six straight BCS games with a 5-1 record, along with 3 Heisman winners this decade is pretty impressive). However, you're doing a hell of a job in sounding ignorant.

  • I wasnt talking about Heisman winners, that shouldnt even count since USC is pathetic enough to pay their players. Im talking about Bowl games and our rivalry standings retard. And what is this proud past that you speak of? And your present isnt exactly swell either. You lost the last few games to teams such as Texas and Ohio State. I dont think that would be 5-1 now would it? Another USC idiot trying to boast about his pathetic team that has to pay players to come with them.

  • Yeah, 'cause no Domer would do such a thing *cough*Hornung*cough* And when did USC lose to Ohio State? YOU lost to Ohio State in the Fiesta Bowl during Weis's first year.

    2002: Win over Iowa

    2003: Win over Michigan

    2004: Win over Oklahoma

    2005: 3 point loss to Texas

    2006: Win over Michigan

    2007: Win over Illinois

    Looks like 5-1 to me. Please learn to do math, or at the very least look this stuff up before sounding like an ignorant fool.

  • Hm.. seems that you know how to use the internet and that i was wrong. But it still doesnt change the fact that Notre Dame is overall better (according to the statistics of our rivalry) and that USC has to stoop as low as to pay their players to become good.

  • Yeah, it's all because they pay, that must be it. Has nothing to do with the fact that they got great coaches and recruiters. Leinart, Tatupu, Malaluga, Bush, White, Jarrett, Smith, all those guys got paid, that's why they were good. Has nothing to do with talent. And another reason USC gets good players? The guys get to come to Los Angeles, not some snoresville like Tuscaloosa or South Bend. That sure does sound like logic to me.

  • But you dont think that for a second that if it were down to getting paid to go to college and get an education vs. not getting paid to go to college that those guys would chose to not get paid? And the only one out of those group of people that you named that are good is probably Lofa Tatupu. Leinart and Bush havent done much of anything in the league. Let alone the rest of those guys.

  • Yeah, because every Notre Dame player has been 100% committed to their education. Don't quit on Leinart yet though, quarterbacks usually take awhile to develop (Eli Manning?). LenDale White had a 1000 yard season, Smith made a bunch of clutch players for a Super Bowl champion, Malaluga isn't even in the league yet, and Bush was on a team decimated with injuries. Jarrett hasn't done much, but then again, neither has Golden Boy Brady Quinn.

  • Yes Quinn hasnt done much at all in the league, but as you said yourself, it takes a while for a QB to develop. As for Smith he's never been talked about when ive watched football, so he must not be to great.

  • how bout jason tuck, maybe hall of famer jerome bettis or joe montana?

  • Actually Bettis isn't in the Hall of Fame yet. He needs to be retired for five years to be eligible. Tuck's a good player, helped shut down the Pats in the Super Bowl, and Montana, well, I don't think he needs an introduction.

  • How about Anthony Munoz, Bruce Mathews, Marcus Allen, "The Juice", Ronnie Lott, or any of USC's 12 NFL Hall of Famers. (That leads all schools)

  • joe montana> usc

  • USC>NOTRE DAME

  • @FightOn2VICTORY USC fans like it in the butt

  • @hotbhive That's cute. How long did it take you to come up with that?

  • @lancerbryan haha... agreed.

  • We can also all agree that Notre Dame is better then USC, just check the statistics.

  • you can push as long as the player with the ball is not being grappled or tackled. If you watch the video again, you'll see that Ruggie shoves Leinart before he is being tackled.

  • Yep

  • im so sad no bush push

  • any one that plays football knows refs never call that "push"a penalty its a dumb rule thats not even inforced

  • college football's greatest rivalry? one of the best, not THE best

  • I second this comment.

  • yea, it still didnt matter.

  • yaaaa...the clip and logic bind together and collectively say otherwise. Watch again. Leinart was stopped near-cold until bush (benches 335) bashed him with a pretty solid shot in the back.

  • no bush push this year

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more