USCongress, nobody likes a person who analyzes youtube comments. save that shit for class. trust me no one gives a fuck how educated u are or what points u have to make, stop being a fag. MARIJUANA is fucking amazing and its sad that u support a government that has its head so far up its own ass, the country is now backwards. fuck you and fuck the real U.S. congress !
USCongress, why are you so against the possibility of helping someone's life? Sure, it may not be a 'cure', but if using Cannabis helps anyone with cancer in ANY possible way then it should be researched further. I agree that it may not be a 100% cure, but it has shown numerous times that increases a patients quality of life far more than chemo or any other man made drug.
there is very intriguing news that thc directly kills cancer cells..u can find these claims from many many doctors, scientists, people, patients, ect..i'm suspecting that it does a lot more than just aid a sick persons quality of life.
The proposition that Cannabis can cure breast cancer is absolutely ludicrous and to anyone that has even a remote understanding of biomedical science, it is pure comedy. Sorry guys, but Cannabis is absolutely not a cure for cancer and it never will be.
Oh BURN!!! You just got shot down, even before you posted. Check out the results in this video. Yes, those who have FAR MORE than a remote understanding of biomedical science have confirmed it.
Well with pot-smoking dumbasses like you, there is no point in arguing cold, hard scientific fact because it is obviously beyond the understanding of your feeble, uneducated minds. Quote one scientific publication in a peer-reviewed journal with an IF>15 supporting your claim and you may have something to argue with. Anyone can make a dumb video. Grow up you stupid fuck and get an education. Idiot.
Every time you post you lend yourself less credit. Contact the scientists at California Pacific Medical Center. Dr. Sean McAllister would be someone to talk to, he is featured in this video.
Also check sethgroup. org
When you make very un-scientific statements such as "Cannabis is absolutely not a cure for cancer and it never will be."
Tells me that Dr. Sean McAllister may ask if you wish to be sterilized so that you can't produce offspring. Let's hope your reply is "yes".
The definition of a "cure for cancer" is defined as something that is effective at eliminating 100% of the cancer cell population in 100% of the patients tested 100% of the time with a 0% chance of recurrence/remission. I checked all 11 (which by the way is a very weak record for a PhD) peer-reviewed publications which were all in journals with IF<15 (which is not particularly significant) and none provided evidence to prove my preceding statement.
USCongress: "The definition of a "cure for cancer" is defined as something that is effective at eliminating 100% of the cancer cell population in 100% of the patients tested 100% of the time with a 0% chance of remission."
xcannabiscom: Then by YOUR definition there will likely never be a cure for cancer. Because 100% of the time in each scenario list is not practical for any "cure" for anything.
Regardless how YOU define "cure". The fact is, that cannabis effectively fights cancer!
Furthermore, in none of the 11 papers McAllister has produce has he used actual cancer patients. Most of his studies are in human cancer cell lines and the closest he comes to is a mouse model. To put this into perspective for someone who clearly doesn't have a science or medical background such as you, 1/10000 molecular leads that are successful in pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo testing FAIL in Phase I clinical trials.
We all know you were the guy not invited to any party as a kid, you were the one getting his ass kicked everyday.You don't know what your talking about before my brother in law died at your Mayo Clinic of Cancer the Doctors encouraged him to smoke Marijuana so I don't believe you actually work there I was there until he died go fuck yourself
To shut down uneducated fools such as you even more, both this video and all of McAllister's papers deal with cannabidiol and cannabinoid receptors, the former of which is an organic derivative of Cannibis and the latter is present in the organism. In other words, I once again repeat my initial statement that "Cannabis is absolutely not a cure for cancer and it never will be" because McAllister is talking about the cannabidiol molecule NOT Cannibis itself.
Sorry to disappoint the desperate drug addicts like you who are looking for anything and everything to support your degenerate lifestyles but you have to look somewhere else. Also, the "California Pacific Medical Center" produces work that is laughable at best when it compares with work being done in REAL cancer research institutions (Sloan-Kettering, Dana-Farber, Sidney-Kimmel, M.D. Anderson (which is where I'm currently doing my post-doc at), Mayo Clinic, Ivy League institutions etc.).
USCongress says:""California Pacific Medical Center" produces work that is laughable at best when it compares with work being done in REAL cancer research institutions"
Once again you prove yourself ignorant. I've made other videos on the same topic. You would be well informed to know that Anju Preet, PhD, a Harvard University researcher in Boston who tested the chemical also agrees with this assessment that cannabinoids (i.e. cannabis) fights lung cancer tumors effectively.
"Sorry to disappoint the desperate drug addicts like you who are looking for anything and everything to support your degenerate lifestyles but you have to look somewhere else."
I don't have cancer. This research doesn't specifically benefit me.
I have lost several to cancer already, and my father has been diagnosed with Glioblastoma.
The research found at SethGroup. org shows that cannabis is effective of killing cancerous brain cells.
"Sorry to disappoint the desperate drug addicts like you who are looking for anything and everything to support your degenerate lifestyles but you have to look somewhere else"
desperate drug addicts with degenerate lifestyles?
I smoke marijuana every day, and I am one of the top lawyers in the great state of new york, and I am only 24 years old...doesn't sound to desperate or degenerate to me. besides what do you do for a living? work at the local wal-mart down in some redneck town?
and plus, if there was nothing good about pot, then why would researchers even bother testing anything to do with pot? because they see hope in some of its compounds, and if you were dying of cancer or your child had cancer, i'm willing to bet every cent that i earn this year from my investments that if they said smoking marijuana would make cancer disappear, you would try it or give it to your child...then i'd like to see you call your child a drug addict or a degenerate, you ignorant prick.
Again, more ranting from the blind, foolish, and uneducated. This time we have a very bad liar as well.
"I smoke marijuana every day, and I am one of the top lawyers in the great state of new york, and I am only 24 years old...doesn't sound to desperate or degenerate to me." < Pure comedy. It would be a miracle if someone as remarkably dumb as you would even GET IN to University
you're a complete utter jackass..do u know that?..lets say u are right, and THC doesn't cure cancer..lets say it doesn't do anything for cancer at all. what does that have to do with anything if people personally experience a physical and mental state of well being for a wide range of ailments?..i know what cannabis can do for several ailments just within my daily life. do u think i'd find it relevanet if a team of scientists said it doesn't help, if i KNEW it did thru personal experience?
"I smoke marijuana every day, and I am one of the top lawyers in the great state of new york, and I am only 24 years old...doesn't sound to desperate or degenerate to me." < With a user name like "jesusboner", a highly unprofessional manner of articulating weak excuses for "points", an immature user page with your stated occupation as "drug dealer" and name as "I HATE RIGHT WING REDNECKS" you are trying to convince me that you are "one of the top lawyers". You are not only dumb, but retarded.
its a youtube page, i do not care what the name is nor do i care to put my life story on my youtube page, fact of the matter is, i am a lawyer, i smoke pot, and i am fighting to legalize it
and that's what u lack..EXPERIENCE..i'm assuming u do not use cannabis..so, you'd never know what it can do for certain ailments..u rely on scientists to tell u if it works or doesn't work..but hey, who can blame u if u don't use the plant?..they are your source for information..but, not mine. when i get a stomach ache, and smoke a bowl, and my stomach ache drastically subsides, i don't need a scientist telling me if it does or doesn't help stomach aches..it's the same for cancer.
"1/10000 molecular leads that are successful in pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo testing FAIL" < my mistake. I meant 9999/10000 molecular leads fail (1/10000 are successful).
Pharmaceutical companies are spending 10's of millions on this research right now. Marijuana will finally get the respect and research that it has deserved for so long.
This won't mean legalization immediately but it will pave the way for rescheduling marijuana as a Schedule 2 or possibly something else. But it certainly can't remain a schedule 1 drug much longer.
I've got a petition at xcannabis. com for rescheduling cannabis. Please sign it!
See my profile for the link and search for the product C O G N I C O R E.
willer009 1 year ago
no could be about it ...face it ..its one of many cures!!..The government can cure the world...that will never happen, so lets do it our selves
Dragonstud 2 years ago
USCongress, nobody likes a person who analyzes youtube comments. save that shit for class. trust me no one gives a fuck how educated u are or what points u have to make, stop being a fag. MARIJUANA is fucking amazing and its sad that u support a government that has its head so far up its own ass, the country is now backwards. fuck you and fuck the real U.S. congress !
justBAKED42O 2 years ago
Cure for cancer=70 trace minerals
Mexicanblood493 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I know a man how died of cancer rapidly and smoked marijuana everyday..the good stuff too apparently, NE NSW Aust.
itsgone2 2 years ago
USCongress, why are you so against the possibility of helping someone's life? Sure, it may not be a 'cure', but if using Cannabis helps anyone with cancer in ANY possible way then it should be researched further. I agree that it may not be a 100% cure, but it has shown numerous times that increases a patients quality of life far more than chemo or any other man made drug.
geezgsr 2 years ago 2
there is very intriguing news that thc directly kills cancer cells..u can find these claims from many many doctors, scientists, people, patients, ect..i'm suspecting that it does a lot more than just aid a sick persons quality of life.
itzahazylife 2 years ago 3
CANCER CURE = HEMP OIL
EssiacHempLaetrile 2 years ago 4
The proposition that Cannabis can cure breast cancer is absolutely ludicrous and to anyone that has even a remote understanding of biomedical science, it is pure comedy. Sorry guys, but Cannabis is absolutely not a cure for cancer and it never will be.
USCongress 3 years ago
Oh BURN!!! You just got shot down, even before you posted. Check out the results in this video. Yes, those who have FAR MORE than a remote understanding of biomedical science have confirmed it.
You're an idiot UScongress..
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
Well with pot-smoking dumbasses like you, there is no point in arguing cold, hard scientific fact because it is obviously beyond the understanding of your feeble, uneducated minds. Quote one scientific publication in a peer-reviewed journal with an IF>15 supporting your claim and you may have something to argue with. Anyone can make a dumb video. Grow up you stupid fuck and get an education. Idiot.
USCongress 3 years ago
Every time you post you lend yourself less credit. Contact the scientists at California Pacific Medical Center. Dr. Sean McAllister would be someone to talk to, he is featured in this video.
Also check sethgroup. org
When you make very un-scientific statements such as "Cannabis is absolutely not a cure for cancer and it never will be."
Tells me that Dr. Sean McAllister may ask if you wish to be sterilized so that you can't produce offspring. Let's hope your reply is "yes".
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
The definition of a "cure for cancer" is defined as something that is effective at eliminating 100% of the cancer cell population in 100% of the patients tested 100% of the time with a 0% chance of recurrence/remission. I checked all 11 (which by the way is a very weak record for a PhD) peer-reviewed publications which were all in journals with IF<15 (which is not particularly significant) and none provided evidence to prove my preceding statement.
USCongress 3 years ago
USCongress: "The definition of a "cure for cancer" is defined as something that is effective at eliminating 100% of the cancer cell population in 100% of the patients tested 100% of the time with a 0% chance of remission."
xcannabiscom: Then by YOUR definition there will likely never be a cure for cancer. Because 100% of the time in each scenario list is not practical for any "cure" for anything.
Regardless how YOU define "cure". The fact is, that cannabis effectively fights cancer!
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
Furthermore, in none of the 11 papers McAllister has produce has he used actual cancer patients. Most of his studies are in human cancer cell lines and the closest he comes to is a mouse model. To put this into perspective for someone who clearly doesn't have a science or medical background such as you, 1/10000 molecular leads that are successful in pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo testing FAIL in Phase I clinical trials.
USCongress 3 years ago
USCongress: "Furthermore, in none of the 11 papers McAllister has produce has he used actual cancer patients"
xcannabiscom: And did you follow up with the research from SethGroup. org?
Or did you study any research done by Anju Preet, PhD, a Harvard University researcher?
Or how about the dozens of other doctors and researchers involved in this research?
Do you have such a disdain for cannabis that you can't see how beneficial it is? Or are you just not doing enough research?
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
@USCongress
We all know you were the guy not invited to any party as a kid, you were the one getting his ass kicked everyday.You don't know what your talking about before my brother in law died at your Mayo Clinic of Cancer the Doctors encouraged him to smoke Marijuana so I don't believe you actually work there I was there until he died go fuck yourself
walgreensucks1 1 year ago
To shut down uneducated fools such as you even more, both this video and all of McAllister's papers deal with cannabidiol and cannabinoid receptors, the former of which is an organic derivative of Cannibis and the latter is present in the organism. In other words, I once again repeat my initial statement that "Cannabis is absolutely not a cure for cancer and it never will be" because McAllister is talking about the cannabidiol molecule NOT Cannibis itself.
USCongress 3 years ago
Sorry to disappoint the desperate drug addicts like you who are looking for anything and everything to support your degenerate lifestyles but you have to look somewhere else. Also, the "California Pacific Medical Center" produces work that is laughable at best when it compares with work being done in REAL cancer research institutions (Sloan-Kettering, Dana-Farber, Sidney-Kimmel, M.D. Anderson (which is where I'm currently doing my post-doc at), Mayo Clinic, Ivy League institutions etc.).
USCongress 3 years ago
USCongress says:""California Pacific Medical Center" produces work that is laughable at best when it compares with work being done in REAL cancer research institutions"
Once again you prove yourself ignorant. I've made other videos on the same topic. You would be well informed to know that Anju Preet, PhD, a Harvard University researcher in Boston who tested the chemical also agrees with this assessment that cannabinoids (i.e. cannabis) fights lung cancer tumors effectively.
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
"Sorry to disappoint the desperate drug addicts like you who are looking for anything and everything to support your degenerate lifestyles but you have to look somewhere else."
I don't have cancer. This research doesn't specifically benefit me.
I have lost several to cancer already, and my father has been diagnosed with Glioblastoma.
The research found at SethGroup. org shows that cannabis is effective of killing cancerous brain cells.
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
"Sorry to disappoint the desperate drug addicts like you who are looking for anything and everything to support your degenerate lifestyles but you have to look somewhere else"
desperate drug addicts with degenerate lifestyles?
I smoke marijuana every day, and I am one of the top lawyers in the great state of new york, and I am only 24 years old...doesn't sound to desperate or degenerate to me. besides what do you do for a living? work at the local wal-mart down in some redneck town?
jesusboner 3 years ago 7
and plus, if there was nothing good about pot, then why would researchers even bother testing anything to do with pot? because they see hope in some of its compounds, and if you were dying of cancer or your child had cancer, i'm willing to bet every cent that i earn this year from my investments that if they said smoking marijuana would make cancer disappear, you would try it or give it to your child...then i'd like to see you call your child a drug addict or a degenerate, you ignorant prick.
jesusboner 3 years ago
Again, more ranting from the blind, foolish, and uneducated. This time we have a very bad liar as well.
"I smoke marijuana every day, and I am one of the top lawyers in the great state of new york, and I am only 24 years old...doesn't sound to desperate or degenerate to me." < Pure comedy. It would be a miracle if someone as remarkably dumb as you would even GET IN to University
USCongress 3 years ago
you're a complete utter jackass..do u know that?..lets say u are right, and THC doesn't cure cancer..lets say it doesn't do anything for cancer at all. what does that have to do with anything if people personally experience a physical and mental state of well being for a wide range of ailments?..i know what cannabis can do for several ailments just within my daily life. do u think i'd find it relevanet if a team of scientists said it doesn't help, if i KNEW it did thru personal experience?
itzahazylife 2 years ago
"I smoke marijuana every day, and I am one of the top lawyers in the great state of new york, and I am only 24 years old...doesn't sound to desperate or degenerate to me." < With a user name like "jesusboner", a highly unprofessional manner of articulating weak excuses for "points", an immature user page with your stated occupation as "drug dealer" and name as "I HATE RIGHT WING REDNECKS" you are trying to convince me that you are "one of the top lawyers". You are not only dumb, but retarded.
USCongress 3 years ago
its a youtube page, i do not care what the name is nor do i care to put my life story on my youtube page, fact of the matter is, i am a lawyer, i smoke pot, and i am fighting to legalize it
jesusboner 3 years ago
and that's what u lack..EXPERIENCE..i'm assuming u do not use cannabis..so, you'd never know what it can do for certain ailments..u rely on scientists to tell u if it works or doesn't work..but hey, who can blame u if u don't use the plant?..they are your source for information..but, not mine. when i get a stomach ache, and smoke a bowl, and my stomach ache drastically subsides, i don't need a scientist telling me if it does or doesn't help stomach aches..it's the same for cancer.
itzahazylife 2 years ago 2
@USCongress
EAT A DICK!
MoneyMaker051 1 year ago
"1/10000 molecular leads that are successful in pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo testing FAIL" < my mistake. I meant 9999/10000 molecular leads fail (1/10000 are successful).
USCongress 3 years ago
Pharmaceutical companies are spending 10's of millions on this research right now. Marijuana will finally get the respect and research that it has deserved for so long.
This won't mean legalization immediately but it will pave the way for rescheduling marijuana as a Schedule 2 or possibly something else. But it certainly can't remain a schedule 1 drug much longer.
I've got a petition at xcannabis. com for rescheduling cannabis. Please sign it!
xcannabiscom 3 years ago
doubt it
SeanTyasOwns 3 years ago
Don't doubt it. You should watch "Run From The Cure" for more on this subject.
lafratta99 3 years ago