Added: 3 years ago
From: dinevski3
Views: 2,580
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is why I want Kucinich and Paul for Prez and VP, in no particular order.

  • @Rendereason My friend I agree Kucinich is indeed an honest man however he's 100% for gun control. Check out his policies on guns. He's a gun grabber. I liked him too till I stumbled upon his gun rights record.

  • VERY  GOOD

  • I wouldn't feel physically threatened by a women. And a gay man coming on to a straight man on purpose is harrasment. I have no issue with gays, or anyone else so aslong as they respect my personal space. That doesn't mean trick me into a room and pull some BS. yea punching the man may be taking it too far, but it seemed like RP was sorta joking when he said that. But he had the right to be angry.

  • So because you personally would feel psychically threatened, you should have the right to hit someone? Do you have the same view on foreign policy? If we feel like a country will MAYBE attack in the future, we bomb them? Violence spreads violence. Hate spreads hate. Don't start a vicious cycle that will come back and bite you in the ass. I don't care if he was joking. This sick shit really happens so it's not a laughing matter.

  • Oh shut up. We are tired of race baiters trying to throw dirt on Ron Paul. Get lost.

  • "Order was only returned to L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

    -Ron Paul Political Report

  • Ron Paul is the race baiter. I'm just letting you know that he is. So why would you want me to "shut up" if you are so against race baiting?

  • eat a dick dude.

  • I actually like Ron Paul, but I did think his behaviour in 'Bruno' was totally unacceptable.  He had a right to be angry but not to shout 'queer'. I hope he's not a homophobe because that would be a shame for such an otherwise brilliant guy.

  • Not only that, but he said he should have punched "Bruno" in retrospect.

    As to if he's a homophobe, the man called for gays to be quarantined in early 90's, and said AIDS should be renamed "GRIDS" (Gay Related Immune Deficiency Syndrome.) This is all available in the Ron Paul Political Report.

  • and he was right. Bruno deserved to be punched. I know I would have.

  • Would you have punched a woman for hitting on you as well, or is it just the gays you hate, homophobe?

  • But he wasn't a women. He was a man, who tricked and lured him into a room, took his pants of and tried to stand in front of the door. Thats f'd up.. He had every right to be pissed off.

  • I didn't say it was a women, re-read what I wrote perhaps with eyeglasses? I said "would you have punched a woman?" That means I'm asking you a hypothetical. Get it now?

  • Okay but the point is its irrelavent. No I wouldn't of punched the women. Men don't usually feel threaten by women and men are fair game, gay or straight.. Everyone knows that.

  • Not gay or straight, because a straight guy wouldn't be hitting on you. You would punch a gay guy but not a girl because you're a homophobe.

  • lol. I'm a homophobe because I wouldn't put up with sexual harrassment? Yea you really are twisted. So its Okay for a gay man to sexually harrass straight men but not okay for a man to harrass a women I bet?

  • No, you're a homophobe because you wouldn't harm a girl for sexual harassment but you would hurt a gay man. Why is it so necessary to violate the non-aggression principle here? Do you have no respect for libertarianism? Force can only be used in self-defense. Therefore you must be physically harmed before you can harm another.

    I never said it was okay or anyone to harass anyone. I just don't believe force it needed. I'm a strict libertarian on these issues.

  • @Vote3rdParty sacha baren cohen isnt even gay. That is just the character he played for the movie, and plus you would be mad to if someone wasted your schedule by bringing you to a fake interview, then whippin the dick out in a hotel room. I would have gotten mad too, it has nothing to do with him being gay, its sacha baren cohen wasting a congressman's time and then doing something very rude and uncalled for in the process.

  • @poopdroop69 - Exactly. Paul didn't know that he was an actor and comedian, he though he was a "queer" as Paul said. I never said I would not have been mad. But socking someone? That violates the non-aggression principle! lol...

  • what about the behavior of the jerk who sexually harrassed him. Tricked him and told him he was going for an interview on Austrian Economics. Then starts to take his pants off and stand in front of the door. Sure, using the word queer wasn't the best thing. But the man is human and had every right to be angry.

  • Kucinich and Paul are the

    Adams and Jefferson of our day!

  • These were the the two I was rooting for in The Primaries.

  • It is morally wrong to claim you are for Free Speech and then ban people on Dennis Kucinich's website. It is un-patriotic but they do it! Democratic Underground does the same.

    And Liberals claim to be tolerant and in search of the truth? HA! Dream on America!

  • I disagree with Dennis Kucinich on many things but at least he understands free market economics.

    Baldwin08(dot)com or ConstitutionParty(dot)com

  • Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are two of the few in congress that actually seem to care about this country. Most of the rest are crooks and should all be sent home.

  • @Zeldovich Hell yes.

  • Holly cow, a Democrat talking free market. Ah Dennis, you are the best among them. As well as the Good Doctor, as always impecable judgement. Good job the both of them. They need to come together and run independent.

  • WOW! I sure wish that I had bought a house that i couldn't afford! Then all i would have had to have done was not pay my bills and cry and say that my neighbors should pay my bills! My neighbors hard earned money could pay my mortgage via their tax dollars! Corruption, socialism...disgusting, America is coming to its ruin at the hands of Washington policticains

  • I hear you man. Alot of my relatives are apart of this whole morgage crisis, I have no sympathy for them. People need to learn the lesson of not living outside their means the hard way. The two party system, an uneducated American public, and corporatisim, are going to crash this country. Thats what you get when you have a bunch of lawyers running a country.

  • A very telling set of interviews indeed. Well done!

  • It's not morally wrong to save jobs and peoples life savings..No wonder these two clowns did so poorly in their White House bids

  • Taking risk out of the market, and choosing who gets corporate welfare and who doesn't, is so morally wrong I'd laugh if it wasn't so sad. I suggest you get your head on straight.

  • Nice talking point, but corporations are made up of People

  • That's such a cop out. People are little toys to exploits the high ups in the coorporations. Looks at it now all the high ups with millions while the people, shareholders and employess, are broke and flat on their asses.

  • not a cop out,,it's these peoples jobs and future,,You can't piss on them just to spite someone else

  • ...and your point is?

    (apart from stating the obvious)

  • My point is whatever it is you throw around as a name it all comes right back to people...Rich and poor, whites and minorities..Nothing exists in a vacuum..You can't just attach a label to everything

  • You talk alot, but state nothing of value.

    The fact is it is immoral to force taxpayers , most of which find it hard to make ends meet and who acted responsibly, to give handouts to corporate owners and employees who we're irresponsible - granted the Government and the Fed are the root cause of all this malinvestment.

    Corporations arent inherently evil, Ive never said that, but whichever way you cut it this is fundamentally wrong -both in moral terms and in actually dealing with the problem

  • Its "In God we Trust", not in "Economic Bozo's we trust".

    The problem with "paper" money is that is fails EVERYTIME, there's no free lunch. With gold and silver currency was in place, this bull crap would have never happened. Ever heard of hyper-inflation, your about to get a painful lesson.

  • I don't trust god because I don't believe in any God..There is nothing in the economy that could seriously hurt me, in fact what your fear mongering with would help me financially

  • So how about you pay off my mortgage? I was responsible and didn't live beyond my means, but I get no help. Being responsible sucks. And besides, it is not governments place to interfere in contracts. Just proping up debt with more debt.

  • pay off your own mortgage like I did for my 5 homes..Actually, I don't know what it would have cost, but paying off everyone's mortgage was something that intrigued me...banks get a shit load of instant liquidity and people get a shiload more to spend each month..Sounds like a win win, if fiscally possible

  • No, it will just create more moral hazard.

  • To me when I say "In God We Trust", means I endeavor to live my life in a honest way. To me paper money is a promise to pay, not that it might pay.

    Gold, silver you might try to "counterfeit" coins, but pretty hard to fake gold. Paper, its open to corruption and that's why it fails every single time.

    Bank of God = Gold and Silver

    Bank of Satan = Federal Reserve

    Founding fathers ran into this problem, they fixed it. Our present money system will fail, because paper fails everytime.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more