Dude cool Idea! But why dont you make it a 5 minute philosophy and speak in a speed that people can actually understand or lets say i understand every sentence but my brain has no time to let it sink :(
@disasterpiece16 Yes, you are. I don't understand how any of you are missing what he is saying. I first saw this piece in a huge classroom with about 300 other people, during which time everyone kept cracking up and making comments. Just listen.
The ontological argument is actually pretty sound, and unlike the definition of a square which does not say that it is the id quo maius non cogitare potest, and since an existing thing is more than what does not exist, the thing which is higher would be called God, since God by definition is iqm. whereas the definition of a square does not include its existence. But Descartes reasoned that because he could think he existed,he was not thecause of his own existence and someOne greatercreated him.
I wonder what Descartes would think would happen to you if you watched E-news, Toddlers and Tiaras, or some other endeavor that would require no thinking whatsoever?
@THEEVANTHETOON Why, you transcend and become one with the universe as your consciousness acceptance of nothingness balances your ying with the yang of infinity, naturally.
Fuck the start. France has given tons to society. and even just in philosophy in the 21st century we dominated it. Sartre and Camus. fucking dickhead. this guy doesn't know what he's talking about
@rsfanlvl108 ...and starting the Vietnam war for others to clean up, and attacking Prussia for no good reason (and losing -like normal- I might add), and Napoleon's great invention of Totalitarian Dictatorship (who is praised by all you ass holes for some unknown reason), and for not cleaning up your animals' shit, and for ingnoring personal hygene, and for being rude to EVRYONE not from France, and genius war tactics such as the Maginot Line....didn't France lose like fourty-five of fifty wars?
@rsfanlvl108 Hahaha See, historically, France was more-or-less laughed at. Still is. If you look at the true motives behind France "helping" the U.S. in their revolution, you'd find that they had no intention of helping anyone but themselves and wound up looking like idiots, just like whn Napoieon sold the entife western half of America to the U.S., trying to fund a war waged on all of Europe, and lost said war as well. It's worth a laugh. hahahahahaha ...France..... Such a shitty place.
@rsfenlvl108 I've been there and I swear I'll never go back. It stinks, and the people smell just as bad, but they're rude as a human can possibly be on top of that. Like cave-men, but ass holes. hahahaha
Thanks for the behind the scene. It brings out the human in the video.
"I think therefore I am". mmmh, that will be solipcisim. How about "one thinks therefore one is" sounds better. A lot better. Solipciscism is insane. It destroys the possibility of language.
BAWHAHAHAHA just finished my Philosophy 201 class and I found this truely lol hilarious. Kudos! This one clip is enough for me to know i want to subscribe lol
use a better sound recorder and you can speak one sentence at a time at then end edit and merge them all together rather then trying to say whole stuff in one breath !!!!
so much philosophy and such a little brain.... ! huh!
use a better sound recorder and you can speak one sentence at a time at the end edit and merge them all together rather then trying to say whole stuff in one breath !!!!
so much philosophy and such a little brain.... ! huh!
Descartes walks into a bar and has a drink. Once done, the bartender says "Would you like another one?" Descartes says "I think not" then vanishes from existence.
i literally did not sleep....its 5am and im still writing a paper on this philosophy stuff that includes "day-cart", hume, hobbes, and berry o and rouseau :P gah!..thanks for the vid tho..it HELPED A LOT :)
@kermitcintronsucks those are just guidelines. You can call your axes 'kitty' and 'stardust' and draw them as an x and it would still be a cartesian system. All you need is an origin and two points to act as a basis and you can describe the location of every point on the plane.
I really wanted to put this on a powerpoint I did on Descartes. Until I found out it said fuck. In that case, I think I'll put it on there. This is too great.
I was startled after reading Descartes, that he came to some conclusions I also did. The most important of which is: senses are a lie and nothing really exists. But differently than him, I say mathematics cannot exist, for the senses give you a mental image of an imaginary drawn object, which means this is an abstraction of an asbtraction, therefore non-existant. I proposed a few theories on what really "is" and came up with my "Chaosophia". "We think, therefore we are beyond those who are." -Me
Why does it sound like somebody is writing on a whiteboard with a very scratchy pen? Have you any idea how irritating that is? It's almost as annoying as a philosophy undergraduate.
that stuff used to scare me when i was a kid. i realized when i got older that beliefs and memory are marks in the head and since we are functional in the universe that surrounds us, we are not in the position of tampering what is "real". if logic works by relevance (like minesweeper), and we (real people )are affected by other things, everything is realethat may leave a trace. how is a completely different story that goes by logical empiricism
This isn't mind fucking. It's total bullshit. If you actually think about what Descartes actually said, "Cognito ergo sum" it's wrong. "I think, only proves that a thought process exists. if you are in fact not you because you suffer from some severe psychological disorder then there is no way to prove by thought who thinks. thus it only proves that thought exists.
The real proof of existence came from the world greatest philosopher, Popeye The Sailor Man, who is credited for having said "I Yam whatsk I yam, and thatsk alls thatsk I yam." This assumes that you can't know the true nature of what you are but you accept that you are infact whatever that nature is. and therefore because it doesn't challenge anything more than the fact that one exists by declaring one exists it IS the ultimate truth.
@ruperticuscaeser Saying someone or something is thinking is a different case. What Descartes was trying to answer was his existence, not another being's. From what he's saying, we could only be sure of our own existence, not gods'.
@cristien2 it's not a different story ... if you can't validate that much then you have no argument at all. and further more ... I fail to accept that you exist either.
@cristien2 you imply that perhaps there is a need to be logical. perhaps I talk to myself in the shower too. Perhaps I fight with myself and loose. Perhaps I am doing just that right now!
There is no need for logic. it conflicts with my emotions. I want therefore I am illogical. There is a truth.
Descartes is still wrong. None of this has changed that.
@ruperticuscaeser ...but it has changed the need for grammar and spell check apparently. How does one "loose" to one's self? Through a series of regular fisting? Or several sexual encounters? This has opened up a whole new series of questions, given you know how to spell, which you must since you're the genius who can disprove Descartes and all...
I seen his theories on the Story of Science series, his theory on everything being an illusion and that everything being pre determined struck a chord with some, his ultimate belief was that all we know is that 'we think, therefore we are', your thoughts are what creates the reality, take yourself out that box of innate senses and there is no sure way to determine what is true without it.
@COEXISTential I used "I seen" as short for "I have seen".
The past participle of the verb "to see" is seen. This form is used when using the perfect tenses (without going into any great detail we would usually use "seen" when we want to talk about something that we saw in the past without mentioning actually WHEN we saw it.
Quite. 'I have seen' would be shortened to 'I've seen'. The lack of the contracted 'have' removes the time-past element from the sentence making the past participle of 'seen' incorrect. You either need 'have' or its contracted form, without it "seen" should be 'saw'.
seriously, best channel ever. you're my hero, dude. here i was, doin some research on European philosophers, didn't expect to find much interesting, just a lot of dry mindfucking, and yet here you guys are - kickin ass. i'm actually enjoying learning boring shit, because you've made it so interesting. you could actually save the world if they installed THIS type of shit in schools - kids would actually listen, and attend! >:D Hail, the new approach...
could be a great tool if you are trying to teach philosophy at the school... even if all we teach is false LOL. but now i need something so funny and intresting to teach in spanish... any subtitles?
Universal in the sense that its all around us and Infinite in the sense that our limited perception prohibits us from fully comprehending it
That being said our senses are fallible but not inaccurate
They have, after all, evolved to facilitate our limited comprehension
Truth is our own personal view of Reality which differs greatly for each person based on experience, wisdom, intelligence, curiosity, bias and acuity of our five senses
the statement I think therefore I am is a false statement, you are because you are is more accurate, whether you think or not you still are. Fundamentally speaking the Philosophers never take into account simple faith, with out this you can hold no truths, I am still waiting for the evolutionist that can explain where the first atom came from, not what it became where did it come from?
Do Soren Kierkegaard!!!
TheXXmiseXX 1 day ago
Do Adam Smith.
KevMacca94 2 days ago
Please make more of these!! (Can you do Sartre? =) )
beats299 3 days ago
It took this stupid clown half his life just to figure out he existed?LMFAO!
ramatirthadasa 5 days ago
had to watch this $hit for phl class,almost smacked by prof. for screening this!
ramatirthadasa 5 days ago
I like the recurring grotesque face that represents empiricism
benehan 5 days ago
axiom, you mean the space cruise from Wall-E?
AlphahawkA25 5 days ago
Dude cool Idea! But why dont you make it a 5 minute philosophy and speak in a speed that people can actually understand or lets say i understand every sentence but my brain has no time to let it sink :(
Omniane 6 days ago
Invest in a microphone invented after 1985. Thank you. Try a fucking headset, or maybe some tin cans.
Jagabot 1 week ago
Fuck, am I the only one who can't understand a fucking word this smug little bastard is saying?
disasterpiece16 1 week ago
@disasterpiece16 Yes, you are. I don't understand how any of you are missing what he is saying. I first saw this piece in a huge classroom with about 300 other people, during which time everyone kept cracking up and making comments. Just listen.
molineauxful 3 days ago
The ontological argument is actually pretty sound, and unlike the definition of a square which does not say that it is the id quo maius non cogitare potest, and since an existing thing is more than what does not exist, the thing which is higher would be called God, since God by definition is iqm. whereas the definition of a square does not include its existence. But Descartes reasoned that because he could think he existed,he was not thecause of his own existence and someOne greatercreated him.
Rekenbij 2 weeks ago
methodological skepticism is pretty damn obvious.
trumpetplayer444 2 weeks ago
I don't even do philosophy, but this rocks
TheWorldofMax 2 weeks ago
I know a harsh entity exists, beyond a doubt. It probably thinks we're not truly suffering
PowerfulNiggaman 2 weeks ago
I wonder what Descartes would think would happen to you if you watched E-news, Toddlers and Tiaras, or some other endeavor that would require no thinking whatsoever?
THEEVANTHETOON 2 weeks ago
@THEEVANTHETOON Why, you transcend and become one with the universe as your consciousness acceptance of nothingness balances your ying with the yang of infinity, naturally.
Foxstab 2 weeks ago
I mean Isac Newton it's the iPod spell check
AARVIDEOS1234 2 weeks ago
0:44 he didnt discover that USAF Newton did
AARVIDEOS1234 2 weeks ago
english is not my native language, so, y u speak fucking fast???
missrudyfirdaus 2 weeks ago
by the way have fun trying to sleep to night lol
thisisacunt 3 weeks ago
watching this instead of writing my philosophy essay...
titrupal 3 weeks ago 2
You my man, are going to get me through my philosophy exam
witwanggibon 3 weeks ago 16
@witwanggibon the best way to pretend to your parents that you REALLY ARE WORKING!
williamroberthall 3 weeks ago
Fuck the start. France has given tons to society. and even just in philosophy in the 21st century we dominated it. Sartre and Camus. fucking dickhead. this guy doesn't know what he's talking about
rsfanlvl108 3 weeks ago
@rsfanlvl108 ...and starting the Vietnam war for others to clean up, and attacking Prussia for no good reason (and losing -like normal- I might add), and Napoleon's great invention of Totalitarian Dictatorship (who is praised by all you ass holes for some unknown reason), and for not cleaning up your animals' shit, and for ingnoring personal hygene, and for being rude to EVRYONE not from France, and genius war tactics such as the Maginot Line....didn't France lose like fourty-five of fifty wars?
81lemme81 1 week ago
@rsfanlvl108 Hahaha See, historically, France was more-or-less laughed at. Still is. If you look at the true motives behind France "helping" the U.S. in their revolution, you'd find that they had no intention of helping anyone but themselves and wound up looking like idiots, just like whn Napoieon sold the entife western half of America to the U.S., trying to fund a war waged on all of Europe, and lost said war as well. It's worth a laugh. hahahahahaha ...France..... Such a shitty place.
81lemme81 1 week ago
@rsfenlvl108 I've been there and I swear I'll never go back. It stinks, and the people smell just as bad, but they're rude as a human can possibly be on top of that. Like cave-men, but ass holes. hahahaha
81lemme81 1 week ago
@81lemme81 so just like the US tries to help all the poor countries by invading them right? Out of sheer selflessness!
Omniane 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@81lemme81 so just like the US tries to help all the poor countries by invading them right? Out of sheer selflessness!
Omniane 6 days ago
you should make a vid about Sigmund Freud! I like your videos!
ojpfiechter 4 weeks ago
newton came up with the prism of light....
MuzeMelpomene 1 month ago
Thanks for the behind the scene. It brings out the human in the video.
"I think therefore I am". mmmh, that will be solipcisim. How about "one thinks therefore one is" sounds better. A lot better. Solipciscism is insane. It destroys the possibility of language.
Israe5l 1 month ago
This is honestly one of the most awesome videos i've ever seen
Nicklower 1 month ago
awesomee 2morrow i have my final
iDaisyLYRICS 1 month ago
Please do Freud :)
ZRwXProductions 1 month ago
What about Russel?
zairekrieger 1 month ago
I love you so much, and want to have your babies.
atypi 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
Dude, the French contributed a lot after Descartes. I know that and I'm not even French.
jjhjjff 1 month ago
i like this video :)
DescartesPhilosophy 1 month ago
you gotta do one on spinoza man!
StackinnBuddah 1 month ago
how did you fuck up the cartesian plane lmfao
okgo43 1 month ago
This video is the reason I'm doing a paper on him.
iLOVEpicklesBRO28 1 month ago
BAWHAHAHAHA just finished my Philosophy 201 class and I found this truely lol hilarious. Kudos! This one clip is enough for me to know i want to subscribe lol
DerekBCD 1 month ago
Wouldn't be able to write Phil. Lit. essays without these little pieces of gold!
TheDiamondSeagull 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
search my ebook its free
go to amazon and search impossible is nothing philosophy
its 10 pages it will amaze you
TheGaragesale101 1 month ago
Your voice... Just bothers the ever living crap out of me...
Camacho4454 1 month ago
brilliant just one thing, it's the red pill not the blue pill :P
TeteateteMN 1 month ago
HE LOOKS SO MUCH LIKE JACK BLACK AT THE END. NO ONE ELSE SEE THAT?
NeonCode88 1 month ago
Rene Descartes was a drunken fart. I drink therfore, I am.
callan1991 1 month ago
You should do one on John Stuart Mill
benwindu 2 months ago 23
COGITO ERGO SUM!
timitermita 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
use a better sound recorder and you can speak one sentence at a time at then end edit and merge them all together rather then trying to say whole stuff in one breath !!!!
so much philosophy and such a little brain.... ! huh!
imranbug81 2 months ago
use a better sound recorder and you can speak one sentence at a time at the end edit and merge them all together rather then trying to say whole stuff in one breath !!!!
so much philosophy and such a little brain.... ! huh!
imranbug81 2 months ago
Comment removed
DanieltheError 1 month ago
"btwhave fun trying to sleep tonight" lol
CORNP00 2 months ago 3
@psvg1990 you're a *genius
UnitedYellowEmirates 2 months ago
my professor showed us this in class, hella funny
IWhoCreate 2 months ago
I love your drawing of god
NickyChick28 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
descartes was a genious.
pvsg1990 2 months ago
who am i
mlmfilms 2 months ago
do marx
crazymembranes 2 months ago
Come hang dood...
MrSieish 2 months ago
I still put descartes before the whores
Jaedeemusic 2 months ago
Rene is a girl's name.
DrDribs 2 months ago
y u saying fuck all the time..it doenst sounds good with your annoying voice.
Pepotas125 2 months ago
Do HEGEL
Thesocraticbreed 2 months ago
Just one thing:
'Cogito ergo sum' (because it is Latin) is pronounced 'co-gee-toh air-go soom'.
And if you're British, your mantra is 'Bibo ergo sum'. (I drink, therefore, I am).
KleioHistory 2 months ago
0:44 pink floyd invented it !
felipeco20 2 months ago
I am actually watching this BECAUSE I can't sleep. This video provided me with more reason to say, "Fuck school."
RaneInfernum 2 months ago
awesome video
TheTrevo410 2 months ago
okay, this was so fucking funny, I love British sarcastic drawl
WTFskillsproductions 2 months ago
these videos saved my life.
soicouldmessageyou 2 months ago
Descartes walks into a bar and has a drink. Once done, the bartender says "Would you like another one?" Descartes says "I think not" then vanishes from existence.
dennisdamenace3500 3 months ago 127
@dennisdamenace3500 A implies B does not imply that not A implies not B
gorgolyt 1 month ago
LOLL this is hilarious
rccx 3 months ago
its "I think thus I exist." big difference
jewbar2point0 3 months ago
Dude Ur fuckin mental and funny.nice one
Myrusfusion 3 months ago
awesome
vytko1618 3 months ago
*pasteur*
ApertureMiku 3 months ago
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR NOT SAYING NEE CHEE (Nietzsche) you know your shit, sir
Samaflame 3 months ago
I'm in love with whomever made this video. Descartes was making me hate everything and this has made me feel happier. I love you. Thank you.
SeriouslyFurious 3 months ago 4
From a square to God. That's a hell of a leap of logical proofs.
MyBadGamertag 3 months ago
ouch mind blown up
n00b1356 3 months ago
NIETZSCHE! PLEASE!
PraiseTheMetal591 3 months ago in playlist Three Minute Philosophy
This is like the zero punctuation of philosophy!
It's quick, it's entertaining and somehow enligthening, yet very subjective and you often do not agree entirely - but you still love it. ^_^
PaxPirate 3 months ago 19
This has been flagged as spam show
@PaxPirate Nobody says that Asia needs more diversity
Nobody says that Africa needs more diversity
Asia and Africa are already 100% diverse!
Anti-racists only tell white children in white countries that they need more diversity
Canada…America….Britain….Swede n…Latvia will only be 100% diverse
When there are NO WHITE CHILDREN LEFT!
Diversity is a code-word for genocide!
Anti-racism is a code-word for anti-white!
WhiteHussar83 3 months ago
do Bakunin
elo333333333 3 months ago
Nice work!! =D
72307230 3 months ago
Don't pay attention to my prev comment since he didn't even said that in the vid :S
72307230 3 months ago
It wasn't Descartes but Newton that discovered that the white light is all lights combined..
72307230 3 months ago
44 Mimes saw this video.
Deckkeetz2 3 months ago
very good
TheMisterG25 3 months ago
i love rené descartes, and i love france!
SuperRoseland 3 months ago
Please do one on Emerson i gotta write a research paper on him lol
IWhoCreate 3 months ago
I dream therefore I'm not
MrJamesdevereblest 3 months ago
i literally did not sleep....its 5am and im still writing a paper on this philosophy stuff that includes "day-cart", hume, hobbes, and berry o and rouseau :P gah!..thanks for the vid tho..it HELPED A LOT :)
hockygoalie3031 3 months ago
Yay for behind the scenes :D
GypsyPoetMusician 3 months ago
you sound like the guy from How To Speak Geek
AlphahawkA25 3 months ago
Watched this in Philosophy today, along with another one, but they actually made my day :P hehe
CrazyDancinChick09 3 months ago
You're like...the Yahtzee of philosophy. This is awesome.
laughingwolf330 3 months ago
"He didn't even live long enough to get his mind fucked by Nietzsche."
That slayed me.
TenTonHorse 3 months ago
Please make more videos! This is awesome.
Jurijgud 3 months ago
Comment removed
AlbertaSun 3 months ago
Haha 2:00 "I know Kung-Fu"
Chuck reference!
TheStanishStudios 3 months ago
i don't think that a square was a good example of an axiom when topology is kept in mind.
allabastormaroe 3 months ago
I had a good laugh at this... high five !! :D
TheChryslers 3 months ago
Sartre.
ILiveForScience 4 months ago
you got the cartesian plane wrong. The vertical axis is the Y axis and the horizontal axis is the x axis.
kermitcintronsucks 4 months ago 70
@kermitcintronsucks those are just guidelines. You can call your axes 'kitty' and 'stardust' and draw them as an x and it would still be a cartesian system. All you need is an origin and two points to act as a basis and you can describe the location of every point on the plane.
thepandaatemyface 3 months ago
@kermitcintronsucks actually it doesn't matter even the slightest. x = y^2+2 is equally valid to y = x^2+2
habitats 2 months ago
@kermitcintronsucks oh he's Australian! Everything is upside down there.
PurpleHandcuff 2 months ago
@kermitcintronsucks
wtf?!?! was this the difficult question that rose from this video?!?!
yashil17 2 months ago
@kermitcintronsucks it's a joke
DanieltheError 1 month ago
@kermitcintronsucks I guess that's how the Cartesian coordinate system works in Australia.
RyWagner2 1 month ago
these are great. my attention is about 4 minutes.
kermitcintronsucks 4 months ago
aya.shii.org/2011/09/17/european-philosophers-become-magical-anime-girls/
EVERYVERSER 4 months ago
I really wanted to put this on a powerpoint I did on Descartes. Until I found out it said fuck. In that case, I think I'll put it on there. This is too great.
tbragg15 4 months ago
Your axes are the wrong way around. Just sayin.
justin74923 4 months ago
@justin74923 Ha! Excellent!
SeaPip 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Rene Descartes walk into a bar, the bartender asks him "Would you like a drink?" Rene Descartes says "I don't think so," and vanishes.
ZacharyHere 4 months ago
you got x and y the wrong way round
LyricalLies14 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why must the french be so fucking confusing!?
AssualtgruppeVeir 4 months ago in playlist Philosophers - Rene Descartes 1596 - 1650
why must the french be so fucking confusing!?
AssualtgruppeVeir 4 months ago in playlist Philosophers - Rene Descartes 1596 - 1650
I was startled after reading Descartes, that he came to some conclusions I also did. The most important of which is: senses are a lie and nothing really exists. But differently than him, I say mathematics cannot exist, for the senses give you a mental image of an imaginary drawn object, which means this is an abstraction of an asbtraction, therefore non-existant. I proposed a few theories on what really "is" and came up with my "Chaosophia". "We think, therefore we are beyond those who are." -Me
ganondorf59 4 months ago
this was more useful than my university class. lmao. thanks
donshery 4 months ago
i feel stupid but what piece do you use for the opening sequence?
dragon5521 4 months ago
LMAO i fucking love you!
k0tz45 4 months ago
Do Wittgenstein!!!
soterios11 4 months ago
Dude, I totally think I love you. Seriously. Thanks for the great work.
friend2kitties 4 months ago
Why does it sound like somebody is writing on a whiteboard with a very scratchy pen? Have you any idea how irritating that is? It's almost as annoying as a philosophy undergraduate.
Dabhach1 4 months ago
WHY DID I WATCH THIS AT NIGHT-TIME??? Oh well, I quite enjoyed learning my A levels are pointless :)
vilxan 4 months ago
Cogito ergo sum is Latin, the g's are always hard. Not "cojito". I'm not a troll, i'm a classicist.
ChristeaufDeYoung 4 months ago
do one on marx!
cbooth2008 4 months ago
Excellent but please don't talk into the mic, talk to the side, so we don't hear the harsh breath thingies, thanks.
ThorGoLucky 4 months ago
that stuff used to scare me when i was a kid. i realized when i got older that beliefs and memory are marks in the head and since we are functional in the universe that surrounds us, we are not in the position of tampering what is "real". if logic works by relevance (like minesweeper), and we (real people )are affected by other things, everything is realethat may leave a trace. how is a completely different story that goes by logical empiricism
allabastormaroe 4 months ago
Comment removed
allabastormaroe 4 months ago
Comment removed
allabastormaroe 4 months ago
Comment removed
allabastormaroe 4 months ago
This isn't mind fucking. It's total bullshit. If you actually think about what Descartes actually said, "Cognito ergo sum" it's wrong. "I think, only proves that a thought process exists. if you are in fact not you because you suffer from some severe psychological disorder then there is no way to prove by thought who thinks. thus it only proves that thought exists.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser
The real proof of existence came from the world greatest philosopher, Popeye The Sailor Man, who is credited for having said "I Yam whatsk I yam, and thatsk alls thatsk I yam." This assumes that you can't know the true nature of what you are but you accept that you are infact whatever that nature is. and therefore because it doesn't challenge anything more than the fact that one exists by declaring one exists it IS the ultimate truth.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser but to think...means you as a being MUST exist to be thinking the thought. How can something nonexistent ..think?
cristien2 4 months ago
@cristien2 ask any christian. apparently God has a lot of thoughts.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser Saying someone or something is thinking is a different case. What Descartes was trying to answer was his existence, not another being's. From what he's saying, we could only be sure of our own existence, not gods'.
cristien2 4 months ago
@cristien2 and yet you can't prove that, cause by the same limitations, you can't prove Descartes existed, let alone said anything at all.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser that's a different story...that's a case with accuracy of recorded events and people..or history.
cristien2 4 months ago
@cristien2 it's not a different story ... if you can't validate that much then you have no argument at all. and further more ... I fail to accept that you exist either.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser Right. of course i don't and of course you're just conversing with a non-existent being over the internet. Logical.
cristien2 4 months ago
@cristien2 you imply that perhaps there is a need to be logical. perhaps I talk to myself in the shower too. Perhaps I fight with myself and loose. Perhaps I am doing just that right now!
There is no need for logic. it conflicts with my emotions. I want therefore I am illogical. There is a truth.
Descartes is still wrong. None of this has changed that.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser you my friend are a moron
thekieferfunky 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thekieferfunky and you are not my friend, however, you're a douche.
ruperticuscaeser 4 months ago
@ruperticuscaeser ...but it has changed the need for grammar and spell check apparently. How does one "loose" to one's self? Through a series of regular fisting? Or several sexual encounters? This has opened up a whole new series of questions, given you know how to spell, which you must since you're the genius who can disprove Descartes and all...
81lemme81 1 week ago
@81lemme81 I didn't disprove him ... Popeye did.
ruperticuscaeser 1 week ago
Rene Descartes walks into a bar; He says Ouch!, because it was a steel bar.
John27346 4 months ago
My table is empty....
I don't even know If I have a table...
Rossco9992 4 months ago
i would be alot happier at the end of these videos if the church hadn't taken over all of everything back then :/
666SPEED44DEMON666 4 months ago in playlist three minutes philosophy
Months in Philosophy class... learned hardly shit. Three minutes on whim i understand. THANKS
Thehappygoluckytime 5 months ago
I seen his theories on the Story of Science series, his theory on everything being an illusion and that everything being pre determined struck a chord with some, his ultimate belief was that all we know is that 'we think, therefore we are', your thoughts are what creates the reality, take yourself out that box of innate senses and there is no sure way to determine what is true without it.
segano1 5 months ago
@segano1 "I seen"? Seriously?
COEXISTential 5 months ago
@COEXISTential I used "I seen" as short for "I have seen".
The past participle of the verb "to see" is seen. This form is used when using the perfect tenses (without going into any great detail we would usually use "seen" when we want to talk about something that we saw in the past without mentioning actually WHEN we saw it.
segano1 5 months ago
@segano1
Quite. 'I have seen' would be shortened to 'I've seen'. The lack of the contracted 'have' removes the time-past element from the sentence making the past participle of 'seen' incorrect. You either need 'have' or its contracted form, without it "seen" should be 'saw'.
COEXISTential 5 months ago
seriously, best channel ever. you're my hero, dude. here i was, doin some research on European philosophers, didn't expect to find much interesting, just a lot of dry mindfucking, and yet here you guys are - kickin ass. i'm actually enjoying learning boring shit, because you've made it so interesting. you could actually save the world if they installed THIS type of shit in schools - kids would actually listen, and attend! >:D Hail, the new approach...
dawndeschain999 5 months ago
Conclusion of my paper:
"Overall, it is necessary to realize that according to Descartes, none of this may be true to begin with."
cupcakelove007 5 months ago
genius use of youtube!
naughtyboymessiah 5 months ago
God is verb.
debtbully3 5 months ago
1. x-axis and y-axis are switched
2. i wouldn't say that descartes came up with "pretty much all of science"!!!!! :S
3. your pronunciation of latin is hilarious
anyway, great videos ;)
uchihaavengerful 5 months ago
The French invented the compactor garbage truck in 1933.
filthracer 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I took a nap after watching this LOL
entei41308 5 months ago
Comment removed
entei41308 5 months ago
could be a great tool if you are trying to teach philosophy at the school... even if all we teach is false LOL. but now i need something so funny and intresting to teach in spanish... any subtitles?
ecosdevocesausentes 5 months ago
"Everything you know is wrong. Or is it?! You don't know!
BTW Have fun trying to sleep tonight "
GFroilan 5 months ago
Reality is Universal and Infinite
Universal in the sense that its all around us and Infinite in the sense that our limited perception prohibits us from fully comprehending it
That being said our senses are fallible but not inaccurate
They have, after all, evolved to facilitate our limited comprehension
Truth is our own personal view of Reality which differs greatly for each person based on experience, wisdom, intelligence, curiosity, bias and acuity of our five senses
There is no Universal truth
neferiusnexus 5 months ago
I'm just going to say that i am imagining everything that is and ever was.
unscenegamers 5 months ago
@unscenegamers
I think, therefore I am?
WRONG!
I Exist, therefore I Am.
neferiusnexus 5 months ago
hahahahah good luck trying to sleep tonight :D
Emanuel5920 5 months ago
@Emanuel5920 I haven't slept in over 16 hours (-__-)'
neferiusnexus 5 months ago
the statement I think therefore I am is a false statement, you are because you are is more accurate, whether you think or not you still are. Fundamentally speaking the Philosophers never take into account simple faith, with out this you can hold no truths, I am still waiting for the evolutionist that can explain where the first atom came from, not what it became where did it come from?
dannylee54 5 months ago
the statement I think therefore I am is a false statement, you are because you are is more accurate, whether you think or not you still are.
dannylee54 5 months ago
Love the plugs about the French :P
TheDanielWooi 5 months ago
thumbs up if you really wanted to give descartes a high five :D
ersieesmoerio 5 months ago 78
This has been flagged as spam show