Wow, I've got news for you... If the US didn't waste so much money with shitty programs, they could produce more AICBM's than Russia could produce decoys! Seriously, look at the economic difference. The US is a powerhouse. Not to mention Russia's faltering birthrate. The US isn't worried about Russia anymore.
@RUSCrane Your truly deranged/bias in your perception of the world. It makes you look like an ass. If you compare the US's debt to the GDP per capita to that of Russia you will see what I'm talking about.
US: $46,442 (2009) ($14.266 trillion total)
Russia: $9,100 (2009) ($1.229 trillion total)
So, we adjust the debts linearly to compensate for Russia's lessor economy:
US: $13,762,644,191,570
Russia: $11,768,017,736,608
Yes, the US is still a heavy spender, but it's certainly not dying...
@RUSCrane - Debt works a bit different here. If people were to pay back all their debt, then the whole country would be broke. Why ? Because without debt, there's no money. It's perpetual. All money is maid from loans from the Federal Reserve and without it, there would be no money accumulated. US is not close to dieing. The value of the dollar may go up and down as time goes and that's the only thing people worry about. Learn something my friend. Debt isn't really a problem.
I would like to have a missle defense shield rather then nothing. The missle defense is more against defending against rogue nations that might fire a missle at us one day than the entire russian inventory.
@U3X6785 oww... and MKV was terminated by Obama at 04.2009, dont fuck my brain anymore, schoolboy. USA dont have missle defence and dont will in near future. Period.
@bodyguardik I beg to differ....We have had the patriot system for some time. What makes you think we wouldn't have a shieldof some type? Why don't you look up H.A.AR.P and then try to tell me that we don't have some type of shield.
@U3X6785 "patriot"? what shit, wich cant intercept even old as my mother-in-law iraq Scud missles?? Wtf you talking about, schoolboy? And how ionospheric research project can hit Sacred Putin's Arrows? Go back in school, learn physics.
@U3X6785 i will repeat that slowly. "patriot" - shitty AA system. NOT anti-missle. H.A.A.R.P. - where is the point? Lets talk about russian T-90, Su-27? Wtf is what HAARP ionospheric research project in a discussion about nonexistent USA anti-missle defence? supa-dupa secret technology? I repeating - learn physics.
@bodyguardik Well patriot has used schrapnels to hurt mainly planes, It has been useless against Scuds in Iraq (unless you believe G.W.B). Claims warry, but it's likely that patriot had intercepted less than half of scuds and destroyed in flight only quarter of them.
Please, somebody, write about missle defence of USA. Is it really exist? I know only about 1 really existing and working missle defence system - around Moscow in Russia.
@coldbedsheets LOLOLOL? :) This shitty thing still even not on duty, and how can it destroy even old soviet nukes with multiple false targets, flying on cosmic speed? :-D
Moscow missle defence have NUKE WARHEADS, radars of early detecting and close targeting, and different types of missles for different targets and ganges. Nothing can penetrate that, and it works for 40 years already. "Advanced" american loosers, you still dont have anti missle defence, even in 21 century :-P
you moron the mkv will have 50-100 individual machines that will go after all warheads whether their real or not. Can you tell me a russian nuke that has more than 100 warheads on it?
lol how can you even compare u.s. military technology to russian technology???? Everyone around the world knows that russians are only good for making CHEAP and reliable weapons, NOT high tech weapons.
The u.s. has a military budget 11x higher than russias, and we have technichians from ALL OVER THE WORLD
@coldbedsheets Loool gogo yankee!! $100 for a toilet paper - thats your military budget, looser ;) And russian put in their missles not only 10 warheads, wich can _maneuver_, but _dozens_ of false targets :-P "how can you even compare u.s. military technology to russian technology" - oww sorry boy, lets live in real world, not in COD games :-D Russian weapon not only cheap and reliable, but still thery advanced, thats why you fear it so much ;)
i already told you that the mkv will have 50-100 INDIVIDUAL flying machines that will target ALL warheads from ANY missile even if they are false targets. CAN YOU READ?
And there is no way ANY warhead can turn as fast as the mkv. It is physically impossible.
Lol whoever said i fear russian technology? Remember, we beat you in the cold war so you are our bitch now. The u.s. has ALWAYS been ahead of russia technologically, economically etc
I won't respond to anymore of your ridiculous nonsense.
@coldbedsheets you can say "mkv will have 5000000-1000000000 INDIVIDUAL flying machines that will target ALL warheads from ANY missile even if they are false targets", but still it will be the same bullshit as 50-100 and will target same amount of russian warheads - ZERO.
At 1:53; You wouldn't drop that many warheads on one target. One is enough. You won't yield 100 megatons by detonating five 20 megaton warheads. One will likely go off before the others and vaporize or permanently disable the remaining four which would be a total waste.
This video is a fucking joke. you want to compare missile defense from russia to the u.s.? LOL the u.s. spends 11x more on its military than russia does. Nearly 75% of russia's military equipment is out of date or broken. Your commander in chief said it himself.
The u.s. has ALWAYS been miles ahead of russia in terms of military technology. Thats why we're the biggest military exporters in the world.
Oh, and go check out our MKV-L which hovers in space and kills any missile.
@coldbedsheets Nice joke, gonzo. You yanks are 30 years behind Russia in rocket technology, deal with the facts. Watch the video again to get a clue. You can spend 100x times, you still can't intercept enough incoming warheads.
Check out Russian "Igla" hypersonic vehicle, it existed years before your MKV-L.
Newest Russian warheads are already pretty much flying in the atmosphere layer. Good luck "killing" them!
@coldbedsheets "lololol"? Usa cant even fly to space station w/o russian rockets, my little friend. "WHO LANDED ON THE MOON????" - soviet lunohods did, usa astronauts did it only in hollywood films.
@coldbedsheets lol. Live in your fantasy world more, my friend. But still, you cant fly EVEN TO WORLD STATION by yourself, wtf you bla bla about moon?
@coldbedsheets "the u.s. spends 11x more on its military than russia does" - okoz they are, i see the bills - $100 for toilet paper. All your millitary budget is a one, big machine for spending citizens taxes.
If they kinda make the us defence missle do the granade thing but with a bunch of balls added to the initial explocion it will have a chance of hitting the russian nuke thing if it hits the balls first.......................stonger armor to the rusian nuke could make it heavi tho.......this was my idea......
if they kinda make the us defence missle do the granade thing but with a bunch of balls added to the initial explocion it will have a chance of hitting the russian nuke thing if it hits the balls first.......................stonger armor to the rusian nuke could make it heavi tho.......this was my idea......
When it comes to missiles Russia is the best. U.S.A. are so scared to death that the only think they can do is to sanction them and cry in U.N. that they can die of them. Yeah just 2 missiles and good bye America.
wouldn't it be easier, and less expensive to just shake hands rather than try to blow each other up? I mean jeez, the Cold War is over and our leaders are looking towards pace. Why don't you do the same?
@TheEgoFanBoy. Ya the cold war is over and america is saying to everyone that there the most powerfull military, even more powerfull than russia.which is not true so russia is basiclly preparing just incase america thinks they can do something to russia.RUSSIA WILL DESTROY AMERICA
Don't be fooled the defence system is not intended to stop Russian missiles, they are to numerous to stop anyway. I think new missiles is waste of Russian taxpayers money (well or money get from selling natural resources). Don't you see that new missile (Bulava) failed over Norway. For Russia it is waste of money, when you try to counter such systems anyway. So it will be more reasonable to spend some money. Inside problems are really left somwhere. Journalist In Russia escalating only outside..
Можно было и Сатану добавить, страха нагнать. Но все это пустое - стареет наш ракетно-космический щит. А значит пока Тополя-М как колбасу делать не будем, нас боятся перестанут, ну разве только американские не повзрослевшие дети (James60657 :).
You don't know how effect the decoys will be. Radars, advanced algorithms, and sensors "might" differentiate between the real warheads and decoys. With a system in place all you need to do is to updated the targeting algorithms.
You has a degree? No! Well then don't speak (не пизди)! The Shell bait and warheads, are executed from one and same material... the account physicist! ...The Leading algorithms, sensors...the typical thinking for Americans - we Americans the most clever, beside us all leading, but the whole rest world shitty..
I don't understand some of what you said but settle down. I think your hatred of America, and its people, affects your judgement. I am talking about simple science and software systems. If you can't make an intelligent rebuttal than don't waist my time. Just because the decoys have the same external materials doesn't mean the will have the same structure and physics even in zero gravity. There are some tricks you can use to identify the internal payload. Once identified do a simply upgrade.
Plus, one way to mitigate the risk of decoys is to shot them all using THAAD, space interceptors, PAC-3, and SM-3. The Army, Navy, and Marine Corps will be shooting at them. Remember the system is comprised of multiple military assets networked together. Don't think it will just missile on missile. It will be a many-to-many relationship with the purpose of shooting as many as possible. It is not invisible but it greatly reduces the threat. I rather have ballistic missile defense than not have it
@RUSCrane First of all learn to write. Secondly watch watch?v=UDgIBES9U9M. It's a short video about dealing with countermeasures. And finally go outside and give a bit of your time to homeless kids of your perfect russia watch?v=o_hlZ_qljG0
@RUSCrane Actually no, there isn't. And it is strange to see, that someone thinks its a natural thing. In my home country there are homes for children without parents (sorry, don't know how its in english). As for my comment yes i guess thats a fail :D , but i hadn't enough time so i rushed it. Its your antiamerican attitude that made me comment. Anyway its only a waste of time, trying to say that both of these countries are equally evil and the only good country in the world is lithuania (joke)
Excelent video! hahaha , the americans feel so pissed off when they see this video is just awesome. it touches their hearts to know that they are just a bunch of egodelic bastards and they are going to get what they deserve , hurray!. actually if russia do this is because somebody in america is a traitor , because we have more weapons that people know , and we have a plasma shield that can handle this and more, but is classified it will be used later by the NWO they will use top secret tech
Haha! Plasma shield..Do you know to what consequences can result inclusion of this shield? It can cause destructive natural cataclysms which can easily erase all from the American continent
And not only from it, and can to erase all world also. As the nature will solve:)
I dunno why they bother with decoys like it makes a difference. Modern X-band radars can tell the differeance between the RV and penetration aids. There is a shortage of interceptors anyway.
Nuclear weapons are idiotic. If they would be used, we wouldnt be here anymore. No leader in the world is so stupid to use them. Or? >
10/04/2009 13:09 MOSCOW, April 10 (RIA Novosti) - Russia successfully test launched on Friday a Topol intercontinental ballistic missile to assess the possibility of extending its service life up to 22 years, a spokesman for the Strategic Missile Forces (SMF) said.
open eyes. in russian tv poland is part of antyrussian usa conspiracy, they want attack poland and arealy did launched propaganda in massmedia, thats why they compare shield to they icbm, and thats why they protest so much agains shield. they want rebuild coldwar soviet/russian empire
um... so? USA can add some addiotional lazers to the MDS (Missle Defence System). and those short range Russias missles can go to hell ;] well kind of ;]]]
Lasers are bullshit. It's so expensive and uneffective against Russian warheads(important note - our warheads are laser protected). Laser in ABM is commercial fake for naive American taxpayers.
"short range Russias missles"
Short range? What is means this bullshit? It's ICBMs, intercontinental missiles.
@don4of4 -- USA birth rate is skyrocketing , HOW many CHIDREN white Americans make maybe like Russians if not less. Dumbass.
aviomaster 10 months ago
fuck usa
den19902 10 months ago
I think I saw this one in porky pig and daffy duck conquering a planet with nukes... i think there was nothing to share in the end.
VVUULDTUURRM 1 year ago
the us of a is a complete disgrace, to be honest id rather be french
NromulousZ 1 year ago
Wow, I've got news for you... If the US didn't waste so much money with shitty programs, they could produce more AICBM's than Russia could produce decoys! Seriously, look at the economic difference. The US is a powerhouse. Not to mention Russia's faltering birthrate. The US isn't worried about Russia anymore.
don4of4 1 year ago
@don4of4 «..look at the economic difference.» Ok!
Accumulated Debt Russia = $ 840,572,695,472/ Unemployed = 1,708,265
Accumulated Debt US = $ 13,762,644,191,570/ Unemployed = 14,623,782
We do not need you to fight, you have not! Your country as a terminally ill man writhing in convulsions. I am very sorry for you.
RUSCrane 1 year ago
@RUSCrane Your truly deranged/bias in your perception of the world. It makes you look like an ass. If you compare the US's debt to the GDP per capita to that of Russia you will see what I'm talking about.
US: $46,442 (2009) ($14.266 trillion total)
Russia: $9,100 (2009) ($1.229 trillion total)
So, we adjust the debts linearly to compensate for Russia's lessor economy:
US: $13,762,644,191,570
Russia: $11,768,017,736,608
Yes, the US is still a heavy spender, but it's certainly not dying...
don4of4 1 year ago
@don4of4
To no longer be a fool, look at the film «IOUSA» director Patrick Kreadon. IOUSA can be found here - watch? v = ScBUhL7Zb0g & feature = related
RUSCrane 1 year ago
@don4of4 * IOUSA can be found here - watch?v=ScBUhL7Zb0g&feature=related
RUSCrane 1 year ago
@RUSCrane - Debt works a bit different here. If people were to pay back all their debt, then the whole country would be broke. Why ? Because without debt, there's no money. It's perpetual. All money is maid from loans from the Federal Reserve and without it, there would be no money accumulated. US is not close to dieing. The value of the dollar may go up and down as time goes and that's the only thing people worry about. Learn something my friend. Debt isn't really a problem.
AnotherYankee 1 year ago
@don4of4
I would like to see this rocket fly by your house 5am at the morning in a sunny day and you saying ''The US isn't worried about Russia anymore''.
zKRevolt 1 year ago
can usa stop 50 nukes heading to the usa?
mfirebird3000 1 year ago
@mfirebird3000 Nope
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@mfirebird3000 no point, it will end in Mutually Assured Destruction for both countries.... Possibly the whole world.
weipeiwu2000 1 year ago
I would like to have a missle defense shield rather then nothing. The missle defense is more against defending against rogue nations that might fire a missle at us one day than the entire russian inventory.
U3X6785 1 year ago
@U3X6785 oww... and MKV was terminated by Obama at 04.2009, dont fuck my brain anymore, schoolboy. USA dont have missle defence and dont will in near future. Period.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@bodyguardik sorry man, that comment was for @coldbedsheets
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@bodyguardik I beg to differ....We have had the patriot system for some time. What makes you think we wouldn't have a shieldof some type? Why don't you look up H.A.AR.P and then try to tell me that we don't have some type of shield.
U3X6785 1 year ago
@U3X6785 "patriot"? what shit, wich cant intercept even old as my mother-in-law iraq Scud missles?? Wtf you talking about, schoolboy? And how ionospheric research project can hit Sacred Putin's Arrows? Go back in school, learn physics.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@U3X6785 i will repeat that slowly. "patriot" - shitty AA system. NOT anti-missle. H.A.A.R.P. - where is the point? Lets talk about russian T-90, Su-27? Wtf is what HAARP ionospheric research project in a discussion about nonexistent USA anti-missle defence? supa-dupa secret technology? I repeating - learn physics.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@bodyguardik Well patriot has used schrapnels to hurt mainly planes, It has been useless against Scuds in Iraq (unless you believe G.W.B). Claims warry, but it's likely that patriot had intercepted less than half of scuds and destroyed in flight only quarter of them.
thomaspruzina 1 year ago
@manowartrexspacefan and is it means, what you want to be fucked in your ass? it is so canadian...
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@manowartrexspacefan oww you mean it is right in your canadian spot that you use to think :)
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@manowartrexspacefan wow, my hot canadian friend, do you know where Russia is on world map? :-D
bodyguardik 1 year ago
Please, somebody, write about missle defence of USA. Is it really exist? I know only about 1 really existing and working missle defence system - around Moscow in Russia.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@bodyguardik
Name you one American missile defense? LOLOLOL how about the MKV which is by far more advanced than anything russia has to offer.
Check it out here-watch?v=KBMU6l6GsdM
coldbedsheets 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets LOLOLOL? :) This shitty thing still even not on duty, and how can it destroy even old soviet nukes with multiple false targets, flying on cosmic speed? :-D
Moscow missle defence have NUKE WARHEADS, radars of early detecting and close targeting, and different types of missles for different targets and ganges. Nothing can penetrate that, and it works for 40 years already. "Advanced" american loosers, you still dont have anti missle defence, even in 21 century :-P
bodyguardik 1 year ago
you moron the mkv will have 50-100 individual machines that will go after all warheads whether their real or not. Can you tell me a russian nuke that has more than 100 warheads on it?
lol how can you even compare u.s. military technology to russian technology???? Everyone around the world knows that russians are only good for making CHEAP and reliable weapons, NOT high tech weapons.
The u.s. has a military budget 11x higher than russias, and we have technichians from ALL OVER THE WORLD
coldbedsheets 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets Loool gogo yankee!! $100 for a toilet paper - thats your military budget, looser ;) And russian put in their missles not only 10 warheads, wich can _maneuver_, but _dozens_ of false targets :-P "how can you even compare u.s. military technology to russian technology" - oww sorry boy, lets live in real world, not in COD games :-D Russian weapon not only cheap and reliable, but still thery advanced, thats why you fear it so much ;)
bodyguardik 1 year ago
i already told you that the mkv will have 50-100 INDIVIDUAL flying machines that will target ALL warheads from ANY missile even if they are false targets. CAN YOU READ?
And there is no way ANY warhead can turn as fast as the mkv. It is physically impossible.
Lol whoever said i fear russian technology? Remember, we beat you in the cold war so you are our bitch now. The u.s. has ALWAYS been ahead of russia technologically, economically etc
I won't respond to anymore of your ridiculous nonsense.
coldbedsheets 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets you can say "mkv will have 5000000-1000000000 INDIVIDUAL flying machines that will target ALL warheads from ANY missile even if they are false targets", but still it will be the same bullshit as 50-100 and will target same amount of russian warheads - ZERO.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets and MKV is still not on duty. You should prepare Pampers, in cause of drunk ruskie sit on Red Button :-D
bodyguardik 1 year ago
At 1:53; You wouldn't drop that many warheads on one target. One is enough. You won't yield 100 megatons by detonating five 20 megaton warheads. One will likely go off before the others and vaporize or permanently disable the remaining four which would be a total waste.
pmgodfrey 1 year ago
Imagine being behind missile lunch which will , One missile kills millions ...
Missiles carries 20 warheads , 9 or 10 are real.... This give them good chance of survival.
aviomaster 1 year ago
HAARP can stop any incoming missile
skydreamerXIII 1 year ago
This video is a fucking joke. you want to compare missile defense from russia to the u.s.? LOL the u.s. spends 11x more on its military than russia does. Nearly 75% of russia's military equipment is out of date or broken. Your commander in chief said it himself.
The u.s. has ALWAYS been miles ahead of russia in terms of military technology. Thats why we're the biggest military exporters in the world.
Oh, and go check out our MKV-L which hovers in space and kills any missile.
coldbedsheets 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets Nice joke, gonzo. You yanks are 30 years behind Russia in rocket technology, deal with the facts. Watch the video again to get a clue. You can spend 100x times, you still can't intercept enough incoming warheads.
Check out Russian "Igla" hypersonic vehicle, it existed years before your MKV-L.
Newest Russian warheads are already pretty much flying in the atmosphere layer. Good luck "killing" them!
SovietWarrior 1 year ago
@SovietWarrior
30 years behind russia in rocket technololgy? LOLOLOL WHAT A FUCKING JOKE.
Thats why you russians move here to get better education you clown. The u.s. OWNS russia in space discoveries. So HOW can you say WE'RE behind?
LOL you're talking about the igla? LOLOL
the u.s. has had hypersonic scramjets for DECADES(like the x-30 that goes mach 30, and the x-43).
The mk-v is not even in the same category of a missile you moron.
WHO LANDED ON THE MOON????
coldbedsheets 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets "lololol"? Usa cant even fly to space station w/o russian rockets, my little friend. "WHO LANDED ON THE MOON????" - soviet lunohods did, usa astronauts did it only in hollywood films.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@bodyguardik
lol you have stooped to a new low now that you imply that the lunar landings were faked in hollywood. Wow. what a joke.
The Saturn V, which carried the astronauts to the moon was developed by Douglas, Boeing, and North American. All of which are AMERICAN companies.
Get the fuck out of here with your ridiculous conspiracy theories.
How about you check out this video-
watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg
It debunks every ridiculous theory there is on us faking the moon landing.
OWNED.
coldbedsheets 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets lol. Live in your fantasy world more, my friend. But still, you cant fly EVEN TO WORLD STATION by yourself, wtf you bla bla about moon?
Owned in fat american ass.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
@coldbedsheets "the u.s. spends 11x more on its military than russia does" - okoz they are, i see the bills - $100 for toilet paper. All your millitary budget is a one, big machine for spending citizens taxes.
bodyguardik 1 year ago
What sort of warheads is the bus releasing? Exploding salt shakers?
geonerd 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If they kinda make the us defence missle do the granade thing but with a bunch of balls added to the initial explocion it will have a chance of hitting the russian nuke thing if it hits the balls first.......................stonger armor to the rusian nuke could make it heavi tho.......this was my idea......
legoJmaster 1 year ago
if they kinda make the us defence missle do the granade thing but with a bunch of balls added to the initial explocion it will have a chance of hitting the russian nuke thing if it hits the balls first.......................stonger armor to the rusian nuke could make it heavi tho.......this was my idea......
legoJmaster 1 year ago
death to united terrorist state
shamiking1 1 year ago
@shamiking1 yeah, death to evil american terrorist leaders
bodyguardik 1 year ago
When it comes to missiles Russia is the best. U.S.A. are so scared to death that the only think they can do is to sanction them and cry in U.N. that they can die of them. Yeah just 2 missiles and good bye America.
vendetta007mike 1 year ago
AAAAnnd the result is 2 countries that look like wastelands after both launch!
Taimak77 1 year ago 2
Are you sure that "stilettoes" still exist? I knew they have been dismantled according to SALT/START threaties
anisocoro 1 year ago
wouldn't it be easier, and less expensive to just shake hands rather than try to blow each other up? I mean jeez, the Cold War is over and our leaders are looking towards pace. Why don't you do the same?
TheEgoFanBoy 1 year ago
@TheEgoFanBoy
No one's looking for peace and you are a fool if you think otherwise
TheBlindPowerslave 1 year ago
@TheEgoFanBoy. Ya the cold war is over and america is saying to everyone that there the most powerfull military, even more powerfull than russia.which is not true so russia is basiclly preparing just incase america thinks they can do something to russia.RUSSIA WILL DESTROY AMERICA
LeAfAkAtSuKi 1 year ago
@LeAfAkAtSuKi Russia and the USA are both ensuring MAD mutual assured destruction, no matter what though in a conventional war USA has the edge.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
forc defense ok welcome my manuscript cantic
raimundlen 1 year ago
And Yes I read in Russian.
chronius9 1 year ago
Don't be fooled the defence system is not intended to stop Russian missiles, they are to numerous to stop anyway. I think new missiles is waste of Russian taxpayers money (well or money get from selling natural resources). Don't you see that new missile (Bulava) failed over Norway. For Russia it is waste of money, when you try to counter such systems anyway. So it will be more reasonable to spend some money. Inside problems are really left somwhere. Journalist In Russia escalating only outside..
chronius9 1 year ago
еще бы кто обьяснил бы, что в ролике изображено и как это работает против ПРО ?
goodspeedy666 1 year ago
usa thunder
fugitive011 2 years ago
гудбай америка rip world
pavel280488AA 2 years ago
Можно было и Сатану добавить, страха нагнать. Но все это пустое - стареет наш ракетно-космический щит. А значит пока Тополя-М как колбасу делать не будем, нас боятся перестанут, ну разве только американские не повзрослевшие дети (James60657 :).
TyphoonUSSR 2 years ago
You don't know how effect the decoys will be. Radars, advanced algorithms, and sensors "might" differentiate between the real warheads and decoys. With a system in place all you need to do is to updated the targeting algorithms.
James60657 2 years ago
You has a degree? No! Well then don't speak (не пизди)! The Shell bait and warheads, are executed from one and same material... the account physicist! ...The Leading algorithms, sensors...the typical thinking for Americans - we Americans the most clever, beside us all leading, but the whole rest world shitty..
RUSCrane 2 years ago 10
I don't understand some of what you said but settle down. I think your hatred of America, and its people, affects your judgement. I am talking about simple science and software systems. If you can't make an intelligent rebuttal than don't waist my time. Just because the decoys have the same external materials doesn't mean the will have the same structure and physics even in zero gravity. There are some tricks you can use to identify the internal payload. Once identified do a simply upgrade.
James60657 2 years ago
Russia is behind in the game of cat-and-mouse. The only way to offset the US advantage is by creating a Russian ballistic missile shield as well.
James60657 2 years ago
Plus, one way to mitigate the risk of decoys is to shot them all using THAAD, space interceptors, PAC-3, and SM-3. The Army, Navy, and Marine Corps will be shooting at them. Remember the system is comprised of multiple military assets networked together. Don't think it will just missile on missile. It will be a many-to-many relationship with the purpose of shooting as many as possible. It is not invisible but it greatly reduces the threat. I rather have ballistic missile defense than not have it
James60657 2 years ago
I forgot to mention lasers too.
James60657 2 years ago
@RUSCrane is america able to shoot down Topol M or Bulava or Satan misailles?
MrMicoSrb 1 year ago
@MrMicoSrb
american anti-missle defence can shoot down maximum 2% of launched missles, how reporting the command of russian space forces
Scoutrussp7 1 year ago
@RUSCrane First of all learn to write. Secondly watch watch?v=UDgIBES9U9M. It's a short video about dealing with countermeasures. And finally go outside and give a bit of your time to homeless kids of your perfect russia watch?v=o_hlZ_qljG0
mrseipsaus 1 year ago
@mrseipsaus I say to you via a translator! You have the same mind is not enough to write in Russian :-))).
In my clip before the missile RS-18 1975!
And you shows me countermeasures on it in 2015, ha ha ha ha ha ha!
What in your home country no homeless children? Or, you either roll into the snout to poke?
RUSCrane 1 year ago
@RUSCrane Actually no, there isn't. And it is strange to see, that someone thinks its a natural thing. In my home country there are homes for children without parents (sorry, don't know how its in english). As for my comment yes i guess thats a fail :D , but i hadn't enough time so i rushed it. Its your antiamerican attitude that made me comment. Anyway its only a waste of time, trying to say that both of these countries are equally evil and the only good country in the world is lithuania (joke)
mrseipsaus 11 months ago
relax--you dont have good enough antimissile systems-\ur systems were designed 23 yrs after Ussr did\-
etc--otherwise usa would attack Rf long ago as they usually do-
nrouslan 2 years ago
RIP USA
Foo7864 2 years ago 4
Excelent video! hahaha , the americans feel so pissed off when they see this video is just awesome. it touches their hearts to know that they are just a bunch of egodelic bastards and they are going to get what they deserve , hurray!. actually if russia do this is because somebody in america is a traitor , because we have more weapons that people know , and we have a plasma shield that can handle this and more, but is classified it will be used later by the NWO they will use top secret tech
facejointdotcom 2 years ago
Haha! Plasma shield..Do you know to what consequences can result inclusion of this shield? It can cause destructive natural cataclysms which can easily erase all from the American continent
And not only from it, and can to erase all world also. As the nature will solve:)
Vladimir190284 2 years ago
Comment removed
Nike42rus 2 years ago
Comment removed
Nike42rus 2 years ago
Whats the name of that music?
auto9898 2 years ago
I dunno why they bother with decoys like it makes a difference. Modern X-band radars can tell the differeance between the RV and penetration aids. There is a shortage of interceptors anyway.
auto9898 2 years ago
/watch?v=ImZgovtUDDc
maxispeed0 2 years ago
great video!
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago
....
antarel 2 years ago
it is cool !!!
RomaPerm 2 years ago
Stillet--missile designed in 1967--landbased --was modernised 2 times--its a one of the most reliable missiles of R/---
there is no shield vs zat today--
nrouslan 2 years ago
Nuclear weapons are idiotic. If they would be used, we wouldnt be here anymore. No leader in the world is so stupid to use them. Or? >
10/04/2009 13:09 MOSCOW, April 10 (RIA Novosti) - Russia successfully test launched on Friday a Topol intercontinental ballistic missile to assess the possibility of extending its service life up to 22 years, a spokesman for the Strategic Missile Forces (SMF) said.
draadstaal33 2 years ago
read the drop shoot plan. and say who stupid.....
papilen 2 years ago
USA have a new technologi for the missiles, so they dont fly into these "balls"...
but IF the missiles was like that, why would USA build the defense?????
ostdrengen 2 years ago
Read more book and do not wake to assign the foolish questions .
RUSCrane 2 years ago 3
I do.
USA have a new missil technologi... It wont fly in these "balls"
ostdrengen 2 years ago
is america really that stupid, to make their missiles fly into this round "ball"?
ostdrengen 2 years ago
My friend! ))) On radar a rocket and ball look identically!
RUSCrane 2 years ago
guys lets think of peace in this world,because if u make a war no one win,JUSTA MAKE PEACE NOT WAR<3<3<3
kikbaia 3 years ago 13
@kikbaia WAAAAR ! Dead peoples,KILL !!!!
MattafixTm 1 year ago
@kikbaia war is necessary war brings peace.
fallout401 1 year ago
@kikbaia Tell that to Allah
NothingAtAllXD 1 year ago
HAVE U EVER HEARD OF Aegis U WILL
Conservativepacheat 3 years ago
lul, aegis is a shit system.
bonkbonk12 2 years ago
Boy this crap just keeps going and going. Its like the war was over 20 years ago but people don't realize it.
They always have to be "better".
dregothic 3 years ago
I thought Russia was our Friend.. some friends. I think it is a 70 year inferior complex.
businessguys 3 years ago
open eyes. in russian tv poland is part of antyrussian usa conspiracy, they want attack poland and arealy did launched propaganda in massmedia, thats why they compare shield to they icbm, and thats why they protest so much agains shield. they want rebuild coldwar soviet/russian empire
infobreaker 2 years ago
It is a delirium! Are you ready to lick the back to America?
RUSCrane 2 years ago
@ForcedEurope: träum weiter !
schönes video
voevoda43 3 years ago
um... so? USA can add some addiotional lazers to the MDS (Missle Defence System). and those short range Russias missles can go to hell ;] well kind of ;]]]
ForcedEurope 3 years ago
Lasers are bullshit. It's so expensive and uneffective against Russian warheads(important note - our warheads are laser protected). Laser in ABM is commercial fake for naive American taxpayers.
"short range Russias missles"
Short range? What is means this bullshit? It's ICBMs, intercontinental missiles.
Primorsky 3 years ago 2
well russians say that their short range crap is impossible to hit and is verry affective
ForcedEurope 3 years ago
lmao nice dream^^
kikbaia 3 years ago