Absolutely gripping. Imagine you hadn't read the info; to whom would you ascribe this work?Obviously Skriabin has the major influence, but is it possible Pasternak had already heard Berg's op.1?(in b-minor!). If not,then it's a prime example of expressionist Zeitgeist! And what a fine impassioned interpretation: a Poetess/Author/Composer/Pianist plays work by a Poet/Author/Composer/Philosopher. An unusual occurence and one i've much enjoyed. Thank you.
So someone with no knowledge of theory, form, phrase structure, harmonic function, modulation, and writing for the piano "could replicate this piece and no one would know the difference"?
@eldonstrombert That's just ignorant. I suppose I know what you mean, but that is not at all what you're saying. You should think about the difference in talking about your own feelings towards something and explaining them ad rem and what you're actually talking about. Your statement explains your personal opinion about the music but has nothing to do with reality.
Very impressive.. this could be passed off as a lost work of scriabin! I love the theme.
hoek2000 1 year ago
love it.
mikejr41387 2 years ago
Absolutely gripping. Imagine you hadn't read the info; to whom would you ascribe this work?Obviously Skriabin has the major influence, but is it possible Pasternak had already heard Berg's op.1?(in b-minor!). If not,then it's a prime example of expressionist Zeitgeist! And what a fine impassioned interpretation: a Poetess/Author/Composer/Pianist plays work by a Poet/Author/Composer/Philosopher. An unusual occurence and one i've much enjoyed. Thank you.
NOSEhow2LIV 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Suppose there is a listener outthere somewhere, with no musical training, who could replicate this piece and no one would know the difference
eldonstrombert 2 years ago
So someone with no knowledge of theory, form, phrase structure, harmonic function, modulation, and writing for the piano "could replicate this piece and no one would know the difference"?
Please tell me that's not what you're implying.
Hexameron 2 years ago
@Hexameron Maybe not what he is implying, but I surely believe is possible for 'a natural'
ReturnOfTheStienway 1 year ago
@eldonstrombert That's just ignorant. I suppose I know what you mean, but that is not at all what you're saying. You should think about the difference in talking about your own feelings towards something and explaining them ad rem and what you're actually talking about. Your statement explains your personal opinion about the music but has nothing to do with reality.
Excuse my english.
TheophilusAmadeus 6 months ago
@TheophilusAmadeus This comment made me lols. Ty
ChrisWatch 4 days ago
This is VERY interesting! Thanks!
evolsieilrak 3 years ago 3