Added: 4 years ago
From: triggerfifty
Views: 192,387
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (194)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Filmed with a toaster...

  • Why don't you pan in on the target when he is shooting? Or like phatclimber27 said film down your spotting scope. While he may have made a very impressive shot, none of us will never know.

  • didnt see a damn thing since this was obviously filmed on an i-potato. . .like to see the person that can judge 3" @ 2,400 yards. . .what a fuckin joke.

  • @7x57mmMauser its called a high powered spotting scope... js. not saying i necessarily believe the shot was as far as they say it was, but it is entirely possible.

  • which one Monocular you have used

  • 2241 yards? Between 900 and 1000.

  • no shit or can you record with a toaster?

  • dang you can actually hear an echo?!¡!

  • Send it. haha

    

  • i can do that with a red rider bb gun

  • @xxfakiexx1 yeah rite, I'd like to see that. the slightest breeze would destroy yer accuracy for anything past 50-100 yards.

  • to answer iamdum's question.

    these rifles are not designed for sport shooters they are designed for snipers to be used in remote environments where your favorite choice of ammunition may not always be available. also varying mission requirements may require you to use a larger caliber weapon such as a .50 . this used to mean two rifles and twice the amount of time to train on those weapons and build your data sheets. next gen interdiction rifles will be capable of swap outs like the rem msr

  • @Scorpac 2241 yards = 2049 meters. I assume you meant to say 2240 yards = 2240 yards and not 2400 like the title says.

  • try to no scope.

  • @xUKWTAKUNx CoD fag

  • @Djentard no? just saying it would be cool to no scope hit it.

  • @xUKWTAKUNx That is a waste of ammo and dumb.

  • 2241 yards = 2241 meters and not 2400

  • good shoot tex.

  • which one range finder you are using in this video to determine the 2400 yard range

  • What a lie... It took around 4 seconds for the repeat of the impact to reach the shooter.. Given the bullets traveling idk..2700fps-3100fps I'd say it was somewhere around a 800 to maybe a 1000yrd shot at the max!!.

  • @Hammett43 haha i was thinking the same thing!

  • Thats a little over a mile,

    Man that guys a good shot.

    Windage is pretty high though, you guys have any trouble compensating on that?

    How long did it take you two for the calculations?

  • That's 2,240 yards, not 2,400 yards. Can someone at least listen to these things before putting a headline on them?

  • I heard the barrel of this system can be swapped out for the 338. Lapua, and possibly a 50 cal. Is this true? But, why would you want to do either?

  • @IamDuhmb I like your username, it reflects some of what you comment.

    No jk im not trying to be mean.

    Yes Its completley true, a 338. and 50 cal can be applied.

    they would be used for thicker targets like light armored vehicles, or maybe in an urban environment for cement penetration.

    Still, accuracy beats power, and I would want a small accurate caliber opposed to a bulky explosive one.

  • @Serouisly But there's alot of difference between the .338 Lapua and the .50 BMG.

  • @SpecJack15 Yeah there is. .338 is regarded by snipers as the world's most accurate centerfire rifle round, and the .50 bmg is pretty standard issued in heavy mounted machine guns and M107s. I would prefer the .338 over power. Even the .308 WinMag sometimes...

  • @IamDuhmb you cant do barrel swaps on the m200

  • the world record is 2430 metres when a sniper killed a theurgist

  • Aaaaaay! Fonzerelli

  • just a thought---what if someone was camping over there!! LOL!!

  • nice shot

  • absolutely beautiful piece of precision engineering the cheytac system and the .408 cartridge is!!!

  • Try filming down the spotting monocular, it often works surprisingly well.

  • I bet he got a hitmarker.

  • @ClanMGM fuck you call of duty gaylord, eat shit

  • @Shiftyyxx wow, over-react much? calm down, and remove the sausage from your ass that's leaving you in such a pissed off mood

  • sounds like obama lol!

  • remington target tactical

  • If you actually hit one, it's nothing but luck.

  • worst video ever

  • The cheytac is not the best snipers rifle ever! It's too heavy to be fired offhand, it has too much recoil to be fired all day long. For it to be the best snipers rifle it would need to be useable in combat and it's not. The M40A5 is prob the best snipers rifle ever. It's light enough to be carried all day long and can hit combat targets out to 1200 meters.

  • @PineTree94 remington .700

  • @PineTree94 Actually, there are more accurate rifles firing the same round than the M40, granted it is a nice rifle, but kick doesn't matter when you have to manipulate a bolt anyway. Also most are equipped with bipods or are rested on something when firing. If you like light weight bolt action try the DTSRS or RMSR.

  • @PineTree94 It has the same caliber as rifle tho.

  • @PineTree94 sniper and spotter , sniper 1 shot 1 kill with accuracy at long rang best gun for that is the intervention , the spotter carries m4a1 in the marines and pretty soon the acr will replace that no a universal long range rifle yeah theres better but for the concept of long range shooting real shooting real killing the intervention take gold

  • @PineTree94, matters what mission you're on. M200 CheyTac is probably the best assassin rifle, but sniper support, and reconnaissance it sucks.

    M40A5 is able to kill insurgents at 1400 meters, but wind and bullet drop slight becomes a problem over 1000 meters. And it's decent for reconnaissance. If I was a sniper and had a choice of what weapon to use on duty I would choose the M40A5 on sniper support and patrolling, M110 SASS for reconnaissance, and the Barrett M107 for anti-material.

  • @TheFalconryFan

    Sounds like a lot of Call of Duty bullshit to me.

    If you can explain why the CheyTac would suck for sniping and recon, be my guest, I'm willing to be you won't be able to put together a coherent argument.

    The M40A5's is quite accurate to ~800m, ~1000m under ideal conditions with excellent dope. And that's the EXTREME limit of 7.62x51mm. Nowhere near 1400m. You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

  • @10mmTroy, you probably getting your facts from Wikipedia. First off the M40A5 can kill insurgents at 1400, will it do it? Matters what optics it has on it, in the Marine Corps they issue scopes which are effective to 800 meters. At 1400 meters the 7.62x51mm can kill a man. In Ramadi Iraq a US Army Sniper killed a insurgent at 1300 yards with a M24 SWS chamber in 7.62x51mm only using a scope effective at 800 meters, but yet the bullet went threw the insurgent chest and out killing him.

  • @10mmTroy, PART TWO FROM MY COMMENT: Now, you're probably going to respond saying "OH THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 1300 YARD AND 1400 METERS", but during the insurgent kill the US Army Sniper didn't have that much problems with wind direction and bullet drop, the bullet went threw the insurgent chest and out, considering the M40A5 as a more heavier and accurate barrel it could make a killing shot out to 1400, it might not be that accurate at that distance but it can kill at it.

  • @TheFalconryFan

    All full power rifle rounds are potentially lethal for miles, their accurate range however is a small fraction of this. >One< recorded incident of a 1250m kill only proves that lucky things can and do happen.

    Also, range is determined by optics?

    LOLZ

    <6 inch groups are possible for skilled users at 500m... with iron sights.

    You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

  • @10mmTroy, I'm saying it's possible, not saying it's very accurate and powerful at that distance. I never said range is determined by optics, some optics help you at longer distances which it in this case helps better spotting your target, I highly doubt that you can make a good shot or even spot your target good with a scope which is effective at 800 meters where your target is at 1400 meters. But having a great effective scope plus figuring how good the bullet will traval you can hit it.

  • @TheFalconryFan

    The scope isn't what's effective at 800 meters, its the round dumbass.

  • @10mmTroy where i live about 10 years ago a kid was found dead on the side of the road randomly and when they did the otopsy they found a .22 lr bullet in the top of his head and they estimated from the angle of impact that it came from about 1.5 miles away

  • @deadtofall666

    Yeah, it does happen. Nobody's disputing bullets are deadly for miles when fired in a fashion similar to artillery. However, as I said, they're only accurate for a fraction of that distance.

    For example, .22LR is only accurate <200m. You've inadvertently demonstrated my point quite well.

  • @10mmTroy i was supporting what u said down there to try and prove that noob wrong about his scope there

  • @deadtofall666 "They estimated from the angle of impact"

    Who they hell are they? Magicians? This real world isn't like CSI, people cant just plug in some random kids head wound to a computer and find out that he was shot from a mile and a half away. What you said was so improbable and retarded it's amazing. In other words its a giant crock of bullshit seeing as you cant even spell autopsy.

  • @enterthafatass its pretty easy bro the bullet landed on top of his head and had barely enough jam to make it through his skull you got any other ideas?, there were other pple around and noone heard any shooting, AND u probably had to google how to spell autopsy

  • @deadtofall666 No actually I didn't. Once again your logic is faulty. If I hadn't known you'd spelled it wrong then how did I know how to correctly spell it? How old are you? 13?

  • @enterthafatass I never claimed to be a walking dictionary unlike u i guess, I dont spell autopsy everyday and i nore do i really give a fuck about a spelling error on youtube.

  • @enterthafatass actually, yes, based on bullet wounds they can indeed formulate the bullet's trajectory, and from that, roughly, the shooters position. In a case like this, it would be a matter of finding the angle the bullet entered the skull and the force it entered the skull, and the force of the most common load of that round, and you could very easily (if you're a mathematics major that is) figure it out

  • @TheFalconryFan ok first off reconaisance doesnt usually even require bullets. and assassin rifle?plz.. its a anti-personel weapon used for all anti personel purposes. you cant just say sniper support. sniper support could involve the m107 taking out a vehicle or somethin. But the Cheytac m200 is gonna be best for taking out personel. its better at that than the m40, because it has recorded hits of over 2000 meters, and is much more accurate.

  • @jcskate555, reconnaissance does require bullets if you get caught if you're in a Scout Sniper team. But you have to move fast in reconnaissance missions which you require a weapon which is light and able to carry a lot of bullets and be semi-automatic is get caught. CheyTac M200 weighs double more, it's bullets cost over $7 a piece while 7.62x51mm commonly little less then $1. At 300 meters it's very hard for the enemy to spot a train sniper.

  • @TheFalconryFan What does price factor into it? The military is gonna buy bullets, no matter how much they cost, lol. The CheyTac is a far more ideal weapon for instances in which you need to make a shot at an insanely large distance from a well establishes position. The m40 is better for shots under 800 yards where you may need to move quickly. And neither of those rifles are semi-automatic, so idk why you talked about that

  • @daBlade80 Cheytac is a company, are you talking about the .408 round they make or what

  • @mlacey56 no, I'm talking about the weapon system they make, the m-200 and it's ballistic computer, which is what you were talking about when I replied to you. Man, I hate when people can't use their brains, I even said in my post "The CheyTac is a far more ideal weapon." Wow. And, you still haven't said anything about how you think the m40 is semi-auto, lol

  • @daBlade80 I never said the M-40 was semi auto. You must be talking about someone else. BTW cheytac weopon could consist of anything from their firearms, to their ammo, and comp systems. Don't get smart asshole.

  • @mlacey56 it could, but please try to use your brain at least a little, we were discussing the m-200, and this is a video about the m-200, so geez, let me think for a minute, der der der. And yeah, that was that Falconry guy that thought it was semi-auto, so nm about that

  • @daBlade80 LOL.

  • Comment removed

  • The gun weighs 33lbs. Isn't that insane.

  • @8887588 Weight > Accuracy saying a system id heavy isn't an arguement for a precision rifle.

  • get a better camera.

  • 2240 yards not 2400

  • 2400 yards = 24 football fields?

  • attach a camera to the lens of the spotter and you can film some amazing videos. there are some purpose built units for this as those used in digiscoping.

  • chey tac m200 intervention best sniper rifle ever

  • @joeylastra30 why doesnt our army use it then?

  • @greatestsongsofLIFE why? seriously

    what do you think is the best

  • @joeylastra30 .22CB NAA mini revolver is the BEST sniper system

  • expensive..

  • it's not standard issue ,they cost more, they are harder to produce, if you miss the first, the second is hard to get before your spotted.

    the list goes on.

  • you can get spotted with ANY sniper rifle but since this is longer range than the M40A1 theres less of a chance. And the army can afford ANYTHING since our government (the federal reserve) prints money out of thin air without anything to back it up so cost is not an issue

  • one of  the best snipers indeed

    and the best extreme range sniper systems ever

  • @joeylastra30 no shit

  • @joeylastra30 The rifle is only as good a the sniper.

  • @joeylastra30

    I like the Lobaev better honestly.

  • .408, best round EVER made.

  • @Oxstayne????

    they all have their purposes

    i think you will have some recoil if you put that in an automatic lol

  • cough cough* 2241 yards my friend, 2241

    haha nah but that was pro dude

  • Are you saying he didn't hit it at that range? Because this rifle is rated to do much more than that.

  • You're supposed to be focusing on the target not on shooter's ass :)

    We can't see a thing.

  • @Hesam0000 You'd need a good fucking camera to zoom in two kilometers.

  • @Isosyth He's using a cellphone camera :)

  • Faster yes. More accurate? NO. 408 holds a record as the most accurate rifle in the world for putting 3 rounds in a torso size target at 2300 meters.

  • is that so

  • Well im an avid 1000 yard shooter and i pay very close attention to anything about long range shooting. I watched an episode of Ultimate Weapons on sniper rifles and the .408 was numero uno ahead of the..... you guessed it the .416 Barrett. But they mentioned the record on that episode. Main reasons for being above the Barrett were accuracy and rate of fire. Barrett is a single shot while the CheyTac is a repeater. Dont get me wrong both are fucking awesome rounds i have nothing against the .416

  • Found some more info on the record. It's 16 & 5/8" at 2321 yards for three shots. Not sure what the 416 is capable of but i would really like to see them chamber the M95 in it. Five shots sure would be nice instead of one.

  • Amen to walking out my front door and firing off a few rounds out of my "assault rifle" as CA calls it... God Bless Kansas..

  • "im recording this for the camera"

    he suddenly shifts position to make himself look better... lol

  • CA sucks nuts

  • I agree.

    I moved back to AZ after moving to N. CA.

    Bunch of mentally confused hippies and yuppies hiding in their little colonies, buried under tons of laws paying ridiculously high prices. All lands are fenced, you're not allowed to park by the road and enjoy the view, you can't target-practice unless you drive 120 miles away because there are homes everywhere, fenced homes!

    Back in Arizona I see antelopes by the road, quails in front yard and rabbits in backyard.

  • You wanna see wildlife and enjoy freedom? Give Alaska a try. Just stay away from Anchorage cause this is (sadly) where all the CA retards came to and stayed when they invaded this place in the late 80's. The ones with sense didn't stay in Anchorage.

  • Yes, my dream hunting trip would be in Alaska and british columbia.

    And my ultimate hunt's game, the bighorn sheep.

    My father hunted bighorn in Iran's mountains. I havea picture with 1.

  • Western Alaska for moose and the sheep hunting up here, well Im not sure. Great caribou hunting if you can get into the west central part of the state. How did you manage to get a hunting trip in Iran??? I thought they shot Americans on sight in that part of the world (sadly cause most of the Americans they encounter are wearing some sort of uniform).

  • They lie on the news about Iran.

    Lots of Americans travel to Iran for skiing and mountain climbing. I'm from Iran, all foreigners but those with tanks :) are welcome in Iran. For hunting you'd need to find an Iranian hunter friend or when you get there find a "Margaan" or hunting guide. The mountains are high and all are snowy during fall/winter.

  • Our news media lie?!?! Say it isnt so!!! Well that figures, news media over here is the ministry of propaganda for the global elite. I just looked up Iran hunting online and the eastern and northern mountains look GORGEOUS! Couldnt find any prices though...

  • Yo, Jimmy,

    Tha's cuz the Iranian government as constituted in late 2009 does not govern by the will of their people, and because they want to create the last days for their 12th Imam, the mahdi, so called. Remember: they love death the way conservative Republicans love life.

  • Most governments dont govern by conscience or good will toward the people. Government by its very nature seems to attract the most venal and vile members of society, regardless of the tract of dirt they're governing. Don't know about all that 12th Imam stuff, I just wanna hunt some Ibex.

  • But there would be nothing left to eat?

  • ninja,

    Sorry, not sure which comment you're refering to.

  • IS THAT CHEYTAK M400 OR M200?

  • nxt time put the cam behind the spotting scope ...thats waht i do ...but your not me ...so just saying

  • an awesome gun to shoot

  • Could you have zoom in greatly and then after the shot zoom out

  • does anyone know where i can buy an m200??

  • Kysnek Weapons

  • the m200 is basically an edm arms windrunner chambered in .408 chey tac. just go to their website and look it up.

  • your's for only $12000

  • i thought weopons like these were restricted to the military only

  • nah...sniper rifles are technically legal in all states..i think the .50 is illegal in calif though

  • wow i didnt know that. thanks

  • a sniper rifle is generally a rifle with a bunch of additives like scopes and bipods and is thus not illegal. One the other hand, I believe the .50BMG cartridge is illegal.

  • AKA a sniper system.

    if you have some extreme sniper weapon such as a cheytec your not going to hit shit if your useing inadiquit optics.

  • Some people can make shots at 1200-1500+ yards with aperature sights.Telesopic sights just make it much more accurate and easier to acuire targets at that distance..

  • Only in CA so far.

  • only in CA

  • no they're not, you can buy them. You can buy a .50 barrett too.

  • illegal in CA

  • yeah, well, everything is illegal in CA.

  • can't argue with that

  • honestly i think a barret is a waste of money bullets are very expensive for that

  • ammo is cheap, life is expensive

  • ? .50 cal ammo isnt :D

  • actually its cheaper to shoot 50bmg than the 408

  • never said .408 was cheaper

  • @808scrapa thats one of the reasons why i woud take mcmillan tac50 :)

  • lol. a barret? too bad they dont make a .408.

  • what? i dont get it

  • Barret does not make a rifle in .408 Cheytac. The make rifles in .50 BMG, .416 Barret, .338 Lapua Magnum, 6.8 spc, and 5.56 NATO. Your Info is incorrect. The Cheytac M-200 weapons system costs a total of 40k. That comes with the rifle, the optics, and a very very special ballistics calculator. Besides, next time you run across a hunting rifle that can shoot 2500 yards with less than 1 MOA accuracy, let me know.

  • you can buy just the m200 for $11,000 and i still have no clue where you came from with this

  • they make a .416 tho ... still pretty good....

  • @gearsofmuffin this bullets are more expensive

    and if its a waste of money,why soldiers all over the world find it such a good weapon?

    make no sence

  • your a tool im saying why would a CIVILLIAN want to buy a .50 cal, its so much money and bullets are expensive

  • @gearsofmuffin you have a point but over all you can get ammo cheap I have seen it under $2 a round and nothing is more fun than shooting at over a mile I must say.

  • i wouldnt know but it sounds like it would be, i would love to try that some day

  • @gearsofmuffin maybe because the idea of having a thing like that sounds cool:)

  • Because the CheyTac .408 is the most accurate round to date.

  • i was talking that having a barrett m107 woud be cool

    semi auto gun

    (rather the short barrel version then the long barrel version already on sale on impactguns:))

    cheytacm200?

    i woud rather take the mcmillan tac50

    standard less expensive bullets and even lighter but stil the same range

  • Actually, the .375 CheyTac edges out the .408.

  • @XC2long4u

    try .338 lapua magnum

  • i am looking for longest shot records and the farthis i found was 2630 yard shot set by rob furlong.

  • I believe that was 2430 meters in Afghanistan.

    It took two shots to make the kill.

  • 2 shots for the kill but there we actually 3 shots shot in total 1 a complete miss 2nd hit his backpack 3rd into his torso that made the kill

  • Good, Achbarf knew it was coming then.

  • I believe the shot you are referring too, made by the Canadian, was taken with a McMillan Tac50

  • Could be.

    He missed the first shot too.

  • indeed

  • @simcity2098 no its 2400 and somewhat more not so much:)

  • that is unbelievable.

  • 2241 yards is damn AWESOME, well done man GREAT SHOT! u Got some serious stuff there the Cheytac 408 & those scopes:)

  • Even if you where using a USOPTICS MDMOA reticle, im sure you would never call a 3" correction at that distance, seems very casual correction, more like a comment for the camera than a real correction. 3" would be a 1/8MOA correction!! looks like a Swaro spotter although it could well be a KOWA.

  • well he his a doctor. I wouldn't doubt it is he had a $3000 spotting scope.

  • I have heard rumor that nightforce makes an 8X32X56 that has 1/8 MOA correction capability, but for the life of me I cant seem to find that scope anywhere on line. Was someone blowin smoke up my ass?

  • what does the MOA look like at that range?

  • I wanna know the spotting scope that can resolve 3" at 2400 yards.

  • vote mcain that nigger is taking our guns

    please out of consideration paste on other vids if you are passionate about ur firearms

  • dude! teach me!

  • hey im interested what tpye of rifle is it? what bullets u use for this give me simple details as I wou