@RazorGTM Honestly, im not the best person to give you advice, but i would go with the x4. I have a x4 965 with a gts450 and i maxed out almost every game i played.
a la mierda con las PhysX, la verdad existe una gran diferencia grafica, es bien resaltante, hmmm, me compre una HD6870, joder, huviera ido por una GTX560Ti
Physx IS a superior physics engine- but we simply want to see more. If we FINALLY get this gigantic epic game full of physics based on this engine and it actually runs well. (And the physics play a good role in the game- such as in half life 2?) I'll convert x)
@shivanthing Physx is a stupid engine. Why? It only runs on Nvidia cards. Game devs do not wish to use a physics engine that only a percentage of their customers can use. Havok on the other hand will no doubt be based on OpenCL meaning both Nvidia and AMD cards with unified shader will be able to have the same effects that Physx produces.
On a side note, you are trying to tell me a CPU couldn't calculate physics of that smoke? That is nothing spectacular. The car smoke from Mafia 2 looks better.
I said that little less than a month ago, chill out lol. I've learned a bit more now :3
And when I said physx was "superior" I meant that it seemed more "fluid" in my opinion, havok to me seems a bit podgy at times. But that's just my opinion.
And a even a very powerful cpu wont be able to handle an incredible physics situation with a lot of other things going on around it. But we really havn't seen that yet so, chill out a bit.
How are your sparks so bad ass looking? I have a 560 GTX with the Physx on high and my sparks don't look anything like that. I got the smoke and everything else though.
Good job seeing the difference I don't think I can live without physx :( now I feel like I'm playing on a console with out it. I guess I'll buy a GTX 570 for my rig.
its me or do they look like a child that wants make a picture and do NEED to USE ALL of his colors? i meant.. it looks like they MUST show all the phisX potencial in 1 second that causes a remarkable effects abuse and a subsequent unreality.
@orlandothx it's not you. i have the same impression. hate how bullets turn into long-range wielding guns and such. almost everything with physix involved is overdone.
You show very similar scenes for a good comparison, you're showing more "PhysX ON" than OFF because that is what's more interesting to watch, good choice of music and you got a good computer that handles the game good while recording.
@TraNWhiZ Yes, of course. All vids and screens are stored in "GPU PhysX Games Info" section, PhysX SDK based titles list and news section are updated regularly.
I know my xbox could never handle those smoke effects, but the sparks? im pretty sure it can. I dont like how nvidia buys off everything, true they have great cards, but saying how the GPU brings cloth simulation in Mafia 2.....dude the five year old cmputer in an xbo can do the same -_-
Its not anyones fault, they just need a better reason beside cloth simulation to buy a game, especially if the 4 year old computers in the 360 and PS3 can run the same
Plus when they xbox was made, there was no need for Physx
@JuniorProducer1996 yah 5 years ago, people didn't use physX. however ever since about 06 when the unreal engine 3 partnered with physX physX became extremely popular. now physX is usable on consoles, but it's really limited because the hardware is not compatible with physX. this is why PC gaming is awesome, we can upgrade.
@JuniorProducer1996 I wish you console gamers actually knew what you were talking about. I can buy a graphics and be set for 3-4 years. if you can't afford a couple hundred dollars every 4 years then how are you gaming in the first place.
You dont seem to realize, an 8800GTX is still good enough to run most games, but Nvidia is pushing the new ones
I know you can keep on card for a few years and run most games, im only saying that a new graphics card will cost around 200 dollars, which i have no money for that, i cant even buy the new 360 games for 60
I wish you could not stereotype me with "Console Gamers" just because i cant afford a gaming PC doesnt mean i hate it, i just prefer consoles for games
@dennisgames if the developer uses APEX physx, ATI can run physx. however you have to have a really good CPU. and you can always get a dedicated physx card.
the particles coming off of the weapon effects remind me of Halo 1......which makes me wonder.....if an original xbox could handle like 100 partciles per bullet, why are the particles all animated in Halo 3?!?!?!?!
i usually enjoy physx (i myself have a hybrid system 5970+GTX480 for physx) but sometimes i hate it when they add to much shit you almost cant see your character because of too much smoke
ati's version of physx is better or worst compared wo nvdia? i used to think nvidia is the way to go, but im realising that its not alays true with nvidia (you get what u pay for sorta thing).. ati is coming up real fast now, cheaper and much better too
that jet pack smoke requires one hell of a physx card, my 9800gt would peg out usage, and using one of my gtx285's would get up to 50% usage, so this game was right, it does need a gtx 260 for high physx, i didnt think any games physx needed that big of a physx card
the little things in game can honestly change everything but really i think it looks better becuz physx is not just the look it stands for actual physx its programmed to work more realistic motions to be more realistic because in real life smoke just doesnt come out in a funny what it goes through air but thats ur opinion and i respect that ^_^ srry bout the whole check ur eyes out thing
the sad thing is that whenever someone hears PhysX all they think about is breaking buildings an shattering windows or cracking walls.. they dont know that PhyX also does other stuff
This game is a underrated epic adventure. why is everyone crying about how theres nothing to do when your done with the game, its bin like that with many games, like the first uncharted, infact there is DLC for this game which is like mercenaries/horde mode for 4$ only
fx physics mean physics rendered only on the gpu and the cpu doesn't know about it. No gameplay or story related physics. We need common standard running on both at and nvidia hardware.
@hassanrazza9 i dont know crap about borderlands, but and honestly... you NEED 1 gb ram for gaming. considering even XP uses 200 or so megs of your ram already, you only have 800 ish to go for gaming. That is almost nothing. If you really want to stay with that rig, go for cod4. you should be able to play it at some settings.
@hassanrazza9 your processor MIGHT be holding you back, and get more ram. 2 gb is the ABSOLUTE minimum if you want to game. if you get 2 - 3 gb of ram in total then you should be fine.
Wonder if having a 9800GT dedicated to physx would be enough paired with my GTX 275 for high physx setting. I got the 9800GT coming so hope it will be enough....
Soon on my channel will be the review of the Dandy, Sega, PleyStayshen 1) 1 February 15 Overview of the program Dendy; Nastalgiya, (and every Monday there will be new reviews) Come and see the room signed)
@bangNL94 PhysX is physics engine, like Havok or ODE. All in-game physics in Dark Void is based on PhysX SDK (on all platforms), but this video is showing difference between enabled and disabled additional GPU accelerated physics effects.
@Dj3dda at really, because the CPu cant do the same job alone...
The physics processing in gpu is much faster than in the cpu. so they add a litle chip in the Nvidia video cards to calculate the physics because if u do it with the processor only, its very slow.
they have physx-similar processing on the consoles u know :P
Nice effects. Very similar to the physx effects in Sacred 2, which is still some of the best physics effects ive seen in an actual game so far (the leaves in the wind etc).
dont know i just fuckin drank milk with bisciuts saw the leave britney alone video and couldnt stop laughing and the thing rushed out from my mouth on to the keyboard and then cpu.
Only since AMD bought them out and injected a huge wad of cash into them.
i wouldnt say they were the performance leader either. Nvidia don't just stop with graphics rendering. Tesla technology is facinating! and AMD/ATI are only just catching up with that. "the future is fusion" as they say.
we'll just see how it goes if they ever release fermi.
ofcourse ATI said no, why would they buy something they can already do? it is more software based than hardware, you can easely ask any new gpu to produce sparcles...
no, at the time they said no because they didn't want to beg nvidia for the tech. they could make it, but it would take a lot of R&D.I have no loyalties, you're sounding like a bit of a fanboy! it takes more then a little GUI to ask a GPU to calculate real time physics processing! this is something nvidia have alot of time and money in. ATI are currently going down that road now with the fusion processor idea.
"you can easely ask any new gpu to produce sparcles..." omg - you n00b.
Luckaly nVidia didn't manage to stop ATI from getting physx as long as you have one nVidia physx dedicated card (which you can get pretty cheap nowadays). I'm using 5870 with 9800GT for physx. Works like a charm if you know how to set it up. :D
He was reffering to ATI cards + nVidia physx dedicated. In that case I don't think latest nVidia display driver will work... I think you have to use old Vista one (don't know exact name)
Didn't test with latest but as far as I know physx driver version has nothing to do with being able or not to make it work on ATI. Display driver is the key afaik. You have to use old Vista display driver I don't know exact version now but if you want I can check.
Just type "Hybrid PhysX" in google, you'll recieve all links, files, working examples, etc. PhysX mod 1.02 is working with 196.21 drivers, I've already saw user reports.
The game is mediocre and definitely not worth physx-wise. Don't think there has been a single game worth of the technology. Not even Batman. Batman AA is incredible, but not because of the "dynamic paper thingy" and breakable bathroom tiles; it's because it's a great game and period. The effects presented so far are nice and everything, but it's pure bollocks on the sense that ATI's can do the same job, but are nerfed software-side. This one won't be seeing my money.
Batman has way more than moving paper and breakable tiles. It had virtual cloth effects fog and steam effects and much more. It's called Immersion. Something fanboi's are to blind to see.
Physx disabled does not look too bad. In my opinion, this is not a quantum leap in realistic graphics. Things like Global Illumination and Ambient Occlusion makes for the real, or at least much more realistic looking graphics. Realistic lighting is the most important issue in CGI.
the same way i dont need dx11 for now... oh wait.. nvidia already gets gddr5/10.1 cards so its just a matter of time till 11... just messing u.. go for hardcore games such fc2/crysis or even batman with physx give it a try and than post back... or perhaps u love cs and really dont care about it rite ? think so
nvidia sponsers the majority of the games. doesn't mean that ATI can't build the tech to go with it! all they have to do is buy it off of them or do the leg work with the R&D.
Opencl physx is supposed to be around the corner anyway. moving it away from the cuda platform.
Wow plenty of Nvidia haters, and knowing how to "game programming (and effects)ROFL" won't get you physx, lol sorry HD 4890 dude no physx for you ( i still keep my HD4870 as back up, great lil card) just not possible with ATI ESPECIALLY since You need the LATEST PHYSX DRIVERS to get full blown physx HAHA! were is you'r patch now?! You'r only hope now is DX11 and i'm not seeing it pumping out physx level effects yet...
fucking features which every fucking 2 years old graficcard can render, nvidia just sells grafic-effects as "physix" and every nv-fanboy loves that shit, I'm glad you can mod it and can use it even with ati-cards...
Hey buddy nice vid
Just one question
I'm getting the GTX 460 with Phenom II x4 965 and 4GB ram
But i can choose between that and a GTX 560 with Phenom X3 and 3GB ram
What should i do?
Thanks man
Merry christmas !
RazorGTM 1 month ago
@RazorGTM Honestly, im not the best person to give you advice, but i would go with the x4. I have a x4 965 with a gts450 and i maxed out almost every game i played.
maikson2 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shit man... I just finished the game... Two things i gotta say:
1_ (SPOILER ALERT) The final is very sad. Ava dies T_T I actually HATE those kind of finals.
2_ The game is too short. 3 episodes including 5 leves in them? It should have been done with at least 5 episodes.
My Ranking: 8
RazorGTM 1 month ago
Shit man... I just finished the game... Two things i gotta say:
1_ | SPOILER ALERT | The final is very sad. Ava dies T_T I actually HATE those kind of finals.
2_ The game is too short. 3 episodes including 5 leves in them? It should have been done with at least 5 episodes.
My Ranking: 8
RazorGTM 1 month ago
a la mierda con las PhysX, la verdad existe una gran diferencia grafica, es bien resaltante, hmmm, me compre una HD6870, joder, huviera ido por una GTX560Ti
NicoGamerRS 1 month ago
Im not fan boy!
gimmed4nger 4 months ago
Physx is the future, AMD RTH!
gimmed4nger 4 months ago
This looks beautiful...
BluelightSpike 5 months ago
Is the game good?
all41ger 5 months ago
@all41ger no the game was terrible and it bombed hard...
LOLMAN22 5 months ago
pratically no difference from gameplay
boymatmat 5 months ago
KEPP DO VIDS :d 
wizardsteffi 5 months ago
makes my 360 looks like shit
RbnKun 5 months ago
funny, infamous2 has the sparkles, did Suckerpunch made a technology that looks like physx or ps3 suport it?
alef321 7 months ago
@alef321 by making the framerate like... 10 fps. shit framerate, dat game.
starfox14now 2 months ago
oh fuck me...I need to save up for a good pc
V3NOMXIII 7 months ago
Physx IS a superior physics engine- but we simply want to see more. If we FINALLY get this gigantic epic game full of physics based on this engine and it actually runs well. (And the physics play a good role in the game- such as in half life 2?) I'll convert x)
shivanthing 8 months ago
@shivanthing Physx is a stupid engine. Why? It only runs on Nvidia cards. Game devs do not wish to use a physics engine that only a percentage of their customers can use. Havok on the other hand will no doubt be based on OpenCL meaning both Nvidia and AMD cards with unified shader will be able to have the same effects that Physx produces.
On a side note, you are trying to tell me a CPU couldn't calculate physics of that smoke? That is nothing spectacular. The car smoke from Mafia 2 looks better.
iJames93i 7 months ago
@iJames93i
I said that little less than a month ago, chill out lol. I've learned a bit more now :3
And when I said physx was "superior" I meant that it seemed more "fluid" in my opinion, havok to me seems a bit podgy at times. But that's just my opinion.
And a even a very powerful cpu wont be able to handle an incredible physics situation with a lot of other things going on around it. But we really havn't seen that yet so, chill out a bit.
shivanthing 7 months ago
Comment removed
shivanthing 8 months ago
I wish this game was good.
fabioproductions 9 months ago
How are your sparks so bad ass looking? I have a 560 GTX with the Physx on high and my sparks don't look anything like that. I got the smoke and everything else though.
NiteX2 10 months ago
Which song is this from Ex Machina in the second half of the video? You just wrote OST. =/
Grayfox354 10 months ago
@Sonicspeeders no such card, lol.
airgilbert 10 months ago
good job with the video man. and thanks for putting this up.
ABL36 11 months ago
How can you guys manage to play Dark Void without nauseated
I almost vomit and fall on the table when flying in the air
n00bz4i 1 year ago
Good job seeing the difference I don't think I can live without physx :( now I feel like I'm playing on a console with out it. I guess I'll buy a GTX 570 for my rig.
Daxter609 1 year ago
what is your pc specifications
pls tell
izhan22 1 year ago
PhysX rules
JPMIIIIIIIII 1 year ago
physx and cuda are THE reason why I just ain't going for AMD radeon graphics =)
igouroum 1 year ago 4
Nice Video. It is good for comparing Physx on and off. Nice Quality, Nice Job.
tuhinbhatt1 1 year ago
This is a very good overall video. Nice Quality, It is for comparing Physx on and off.
NiceJob.
tuhinbhatt1 1 year ago
Physx is smoke effects and electric explosions?
przn4lif3 1 year ago
The first part was so damn epic. I feel like rushing back home and playing my Dark Void game. How did you do that part ?
sanjeevx007JamesBond 1 year ago
its me or do they look like a child that wants make a picture and do NEED to USE ALL of his colors? i meant.. it looks like they MUST show all the phisX potencial in 1 second that causes a remarkable effects abuse and a subsequent unreality.
orlandothx 1 year ago
@orlandothx it's not you. i have the same impression. hate how bullets turn into long-range wielding guns and such. almost everything with physix involved is overdone.
GraveUypo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
worst game ever...
lassehall 1 year ago
Your videos are pure quality.
You show very similar scenes for a good comparison, you're showing more "PhysX ON" than OFF because that is what's more interesting to watch, good choice of music and you got a good computer that handles the game good while recording.
The overall video is just planned very well IMO.
TraNWhiZ 1 year ago 27
@TraNWhiZ Thanks :)
Zogrim 1 year ago 2
@Zogrim You're welcome, about PhysXInfo, I wanted to ask you if you still update the site much like before? with vids and everything?
TraNWhiZ 1 year ago
@TraNWhiZ Yes, of course. All vids and screens are stored in "GPU PhysX Games Info" section, PhysX SDK based titles list and news section are updated regularly.
Zogrim 1 year ago
I know my xbox could never handle those smoke effects, but the sparks? im pretty sure it can. I dont like how nvidia buys off everything, true they have great cards, but saying how the GPU brings cloth simulation in Mafia 2.....dude the five year old cmputer in an xbo can do the same -_-
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
@JuniorProducer1996 yeah completely right
simonmitchellbird 1 year ago
@JuniorProducer1996 it's not nvidias fault. it's the xbox's fault. xbox wasn't made to be compatible with physx.
TrendKillStudios 1 year ago
@TrendKillStudios
Its not anyones fault, they just need a better reason beside cloth simulation to buy a game, especially if the 4 year old computers in the 360 and PS3 can run the same
Plus when they xbox was made, there was no need for Physx
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
@JuniorProducer1996 yah 5 years ago, people didn't use physX. however ever since about 06 when the unreal engine 3 partnered with physX physX became extremely popular. now physX is usable on consoles, but it's really limited because the hardware is not compatible with physX. this is why PC gaming is awesome, we can upgrade.
TrendKillStudios 1 year ago
@TrendKillStudios
Yes but if you go out and buy a 260GTX it will be obsolete before you get to the car
I like consoles, basically just because of the games, and i dont have to worry about upgrading for like eight years
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
@JuniorProducer1996 I wish you console gamers actually knew what you were talking about. I can buy a graphics and be set for 3-4 years. if you can't afford a couple hundred dollars every 4 years then how are you gaming in the first place.
TrendKillStudios 1 year ago
@TrendKillStudios
You dont seem to realize, an 8800GTX is still good enough to run most games, but Nvidia is pushing the new ones
I know you can keep on card for a few years and run most games, im only saying that a new graphics card will cost around 200 dollars, which i have no money for that, i cant even buy the new 360 games for 60
I wish you could not stereotype me with "Console Gamers" just because i cant afford a gaming PC doesnt mean i hate it, i just prefer consoles for games
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
what screen recorder do you use?
kwebber1234 1 year ago
@kwebber1234 FRAPS
Zogrim 1 year ago
Nvidia is being a bitch not letting ATI cards running them properly with intention
dennisgames 1 year ago
@dennisgames if the developer uses APEX physx, ATI can run physx. however you have to have a really good CPU. and you can always get a dedicated physx card.
TrendKillStudios 1 year ago
the particles coming off of the weapon effects remind me of Halo 1......which makes me wonder.....if an original xbox could handle like 100 partciles per bullet, why are the particles all animated in Halo 3?!?!?!?!
whatever
JuniorProducer1996 1 year ago
Comment removed
lordfire1994 1 year ago
are they in xbox ?
133aaron 1 year ago
Dude,while you play you won't stay to look like...OMG,my jet pack does not have smoke omg omg....
vladut15bis 1 year ago
why waste money on some Particle Effect o-o...that you will eventually not even notice....
stickmanpivot 1 year ago
i usually enjoy physx (i myself have a hybrid system 5970+GTX480 for physx) but sometimes i hate it when they add to much shit you almost cant see your character because of too much smoke
Cabal4ever 1 year ago
ati's version of physx is better or worst compared wo nvdia? i used to think nvidia is the way to go, but im realising that its not alays true with nvidia (you get what u pay for sorta thing).. ati is coming up real fast now, cheaper and much better too
spongeprince123 1 year ago
the electric weapon Sold it For ME
ylimani 1 year ago
This is just marketing, it would be also possible with a ATI GPU without PhysX if the game would support them?
HIG5HUniversum 1 year ago
that jet pack smoke requires one hell of a physx card, my 9800gt would peg out usage, and using one of my gtx285's would get up to 50% usage, so this game was right, it does need a gtx 260 for high physx, i didnt think any games physx needed that big of a physx card
SrtRacerBoy 1 year ago
Now Ati 58xx Series suport all PhysX...
drakullas 1 year ago
@drakullas 5800 series can not use PhysX, it's owned my Nvidia.
FedoraFTW 1 year ago
nice vid men my congrulations!!! :D !!! and sub me!!!
sun670 1 year ago
What's your Physx GPU?
I set Physx to High but i don't see jetpack turbulence...
robertorlw 1 year ago
nice vid men!!!! :D
sun670 1 year ago
how can i enable physx on a game____
enter6Lok 1 year ago
1:08
smoke loves you very much.
ImTheWackhead 1 year ago
which cards have this ati or nvidia?
emkplayboy6 1 year ago
NVidia (GeForce 8 Series & UP)
mokiesptc 1 year ago
i finished this game using two 5850, but crossfire dont work on this game, yup! there a difference but not to much,
kipdokken 1 year ago
there like no fucking deference!!
PAC1977IRISH 1 year ago
@PAC1977IRISH Are you sure there's no diffrent?
take a look on particle effect that was definitely diffrent point between them.
FragileBitch 1 year ago 7
Comment removed
PAC1977IRISH 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FragileBitch theres like hardly any difference
PAC1977IRISH 1 year ago
@PAC1977IRISH true that was right. hardly to saw difference
FragileBitch 1 year ago
then check ur eyes cuz theres a big difference ^_^
tommyboyfierce 1 year ago
Comment removed
PAC1977IRISH 1 year ago
@tommyboyfierce read what i wrote...theres hardly any difference...so how can i be impressed?!?
PAC1977IRISH 1 year ago
the little things in game can honestly change everything but really i think it looks better becuz physx is not just the look it stands for actual physx its programmed to work more realistic motions to be more realistic because in real life smoke just doesnt come out in a funny what it goes through air but thats ur opinion and i respect that ^_^ srry bout the whole check ur eyes out thing
tommyboyfierce 1 year ago
@tommyboyfierce no problem....have a great Easter!
PAC1977IRISH 1 year ago
@PAC1977IRISH thnx u too i hope u did lolz its past easter ^_^
tommyboyfierce 1 year ago
do you need to download PhysX? i'm thinking about buying the game and it looks cool
runnybabbit12 1 year ago
the sad thing is that whenever someone hears PhysX all they think about is breaking buildings an shattering windows or cracking walls.. they dont know that PhyX also does other stuff
sabertoothray 1 year ago
guys you can't be serious !!
ATI is cheaper and lot much better.
NVIDIA having physX because they did an own physX but it is the processor's job !
And 3D vision ... Who gives a SHIT ?! O.o
it is REALY BULLSHIT ! -.-" !
im not Crying 'cus i have a good ATI and lot much better than your Fermi bullshit -.-"
and cheaper!
MoochingHUN1993 1 year ago
This game is a underrated epic adventure. why is everyone crying about how theres nothing to do when your done with the game, its bin like that with many games, like the first uncharted, infact there is DLC for this game which is like mercenaries/horde mode for 4$ only
legorocks3 1 year ago
uoh my gard
jackmanlol 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i have 8800 GT and with pihsX it laggs and sucks ... so thank you NVIDIA the realy nothing ...
MoochingHUN1993 1 year ago
get a real card and stop crying
shaolin95 1 year ago
hahh ... its funny 'cus i bought an ATI 5970 and it is better than any NVIDIA cards ... -.-"
NVIDIA sucks :S
MoochingHUN1993 1 year ago
hahah Fermi is going to rape it so start crying...plus your shitty card cannot do physx, cuda nor 3d vision so yeah is a lot better LOL
shaolin95 1 year ago
Nvidia doesnt suck u just dont like them
sabertoothray 1 year ago
are u kidding me? the 8800 series were the first GPUs with PhyX of course it wont do it well dude u need a better one or ur CPU an ram lack power
sabertoothray 1 year ago
Effect physics only i see *sigh*
fx physics mean physics rendered only on the gpu and the cpu doesn't know about it. No gameplay or story related physics. We need common standard running on both at and nvidia hardware.
darkultra 1 year ago
anyway i can get that on the 360 version
voodoofriends 1 year ago
there would be a little lag...enough to make it not playable
Shiken001 1 year ago
no problem, congrats on the upgrade, happy gaming.
rayright15 1 year ago
@hassanrazza9 i dont know crap about borderlands, but and honestly... you NEED 1 gb ram for gaming. considering even XP uses 200 or so megs of your ram already, you only have 800 ish to go for gaming. That is almost nothing. If you really want to stay with that rig, go for cod4. you should be able to play it at some settings.
rayright15 2 years ago
@hassanrazza9 your processor MIGHT be holding you back, and get more ram. 2 gb is the ABSOLUTE minimum if you want to game. if you get 2 - 3 gb of ram in total then you should be fine.
rayright15 2 years ago
@hassanrazza9 yes. and well too. as long as you dont have such a high resolution
rayright15 2 years ago
Wonder if having a 9800GT dedicated to physx would be enough paired with my GTX 275 for high physx setting. I got the 9800GT coming so hope it will be enough....
maz12004 2 years ago
everything but the jetpack looks better without physx, in my opinion
bobbywabbythe2nd 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Soon on my channel will be the review of the Dandy, Sega, PleyStayshen 1) 1 February 15 Overview of the program Dendy; Nastalgiya, (and every Monday there will be new reviews) Come and see the room signed)
ozon671games 2 years ago
So... is PhysX like a game engine, like the CryEngine or the UnrealEngine? Or is it a gpu enhancement?
bangNL94 2 years ago
@bangNL94 PhysX is physics engine, like Havok or ODE. All in-game physics in Dark Void is based on PhysX SDK (on all platforms), but this video is showing difference between enabled and disabled additional GPU accelerated physics effects.
Zogrim 2 years ago
@Zogrim ehh if iam correct nvidia cards have physx right? if so then can you tell me how can i turn my PhysX on? or is it automatically turned on?
parzit888 1 year ago
@Zogrim nvm i already checked my nvidia control panel and it was on.. sorry for double comments. nice video btw :D
parzit888 1 year ago
Why does the PC need physx to do those effects?
Dj3dda 2 years ago
It doesnt really, they could program this into the game without the need for PhysX, its just a money making scam as usual
KDCW3534A 2 years ago
@Dj3dda at really, because the CPu cant do the same job alone...
The physics processing in gpu is much faster than in the cpu. so they add a litle chip in the Nvidia video cards to calculate the physics because if u do it with the processor only, its very slow.
Ricardois9800 2 years ago
You dont need to install physx on a console (xbox 360..ETC..) because you cant! LOL,,,so,,,you can´t see those effects on consoles HAHA
vermillionh 2 years ago
@vermillionh Actually, you can if you work hard enough.
Tributes2Point1 1 year ago
i like how my ati card can now do this ^_^ its awsome
awsometurkey 2 years ago
LOL...lame
36dot7 2 years ago
really NOT impressive at all.
hardwaremister101 2 years ago
not 2 bad of a game ~ since it's the only rocket pack game out ~ physx is a plus w/ support 4 fermi ~ I've read ~
TJae1 2 years ago
PhysX is just another reason PC gaming trumps the weak-ass consoles! Long live PC gaming!
MuzixMon2 2 years ago
they have physx-similar processing on the consoles u know :P
Nice effects. Very similar to the physx effects in Sacred 2, which is still some of the best physics effects ive seen in an actual game so far (the leaves in the wind etc).
Baleur 2 years ago
@MuzixMon2 Take a look at Uncharted, God of War 3 & Gears of War & then tell people your stupid ass opinion.
Tributes2Point1 1 year ago
MY GPU IS FUCKED UP ! i spilt milk on it
beatyouful 2 years ago
how on earth did you spill milk on it?
SOF006 2 years ago
dont know i just fuckin drank milk with bisciuts saw the leave britney alone video and couldnt stop laughing and the thing rushed out from my mouth on to the keyboard and then cpu.
FUCKS SAKE ! DICKHEAD ! chris cracker
beatyouful 2 years ago
haha, well thats what you get for laughing at someone, Karma ;)
SOF006 2 years ago
nVidia 4 LIFE!
ATI SUCK!
I have nVidia GeForce GTX260! I'm damn happy.
Xjaje 2 years ago
gt 100 ~ can't wait ~ physx rulz ~
TJae1 2 years ago
fermi should be deeeecent.
LordNeb 2 years ago
nvidia is all about marketing, the real performance leader is ATI
hoylguy11 2 years ago
@hoylguy11
agrees
AlienMagi 2 years ago
Only since AMD bought them out and injected a huge wad of cash into them.
i wouldnt say they were the performance leader either. Nvidia don't just stop with graphics rendering. Tesla technology is facinating! and AMD/ATI are only just catching up with that. "the future is fusion" as they say.
we'll just see how it goes if they ever release fermi.
:)
LordNeb 2 years ago
unrealistic sparkles and slowly falling stones.and almost no basic smoke just because they implemented physX smoke.
that is the improvement? sorry, i'm not buying extra GTX260 or more expensive anything because of that. Already finished it without PhysX.
635574 2 years ago
Comment removed
kahlandcs 2 years ago
they have offered it to ATI on numerous occasions! ATI have said no!
doesnt matter anyway ATI will get it through opencl.
LordNeb 2 years ago
ofcourse ATI said no, why would they buy something they can already do? it is more software based than hardware, you can easely ask any new gpu to produce sparcles...
Shas221 2 years ago
no, at the time they said no because they didn't want to beg nvidia for the tech. they could make it, but it would take a lot of R&D.I have no loyalties, you're sounding like a bit of a fanboy! it takes more then a little GUI to ask a GPU to calculate real time physics processing! this is something nvidia have alot of time and money in. ATI are currently going down that road now with the fusion processor idea.
"you can easely ask any new gpu to produce sparcles..." omg - you n00b.
LordNeb 2 years ago
game full shit
TeMhbIu 2 years ago
lol ShitX, that's all i can say about these "advanced" (LOL) effects :D
sanyigz 2 years ago
I think the effects are rather nice myself.
thuggles42 2 years ago
Luckaly nVidia didn't manage to stop ATI from getting physx as long as you have one nVidia physx dedicated card (which you can get pretty cheap nowadays). I'm using 5870 with 9800GT for physx. Works like a charm if you know how to set it up. :D
syso01 2 years ago
So the patch works for the NEW physx drivers needed for this game and Batman? if so then go forth ATI owners and snatch up those 9600gt's lol
BendApparatus 2 years ago
@BendApparatus Yes, it works with latest 9.09.1112 PhysX drivers and latest 196.21 GeForce GPU drivers
Zogrim 2 years ago
He was reffering to ATI cards + nVidia physx dedicated. In that case I don't think latest nVidia display driver will work... I think you have to use old Vista one (don't know exact name)
syso01 2 years ago
Didn't test with latest but as far as I know physx driver version has nothing to do with being able or not to make it work on ATI. Display driver is the key afaik. You have to use old Vista display driver I don't know exact version now but if you want I can check.
syso01 2 years ago
Just type "Hybrid PhysX" in google, you'll recieve all links, files, working examples, etc. PhysX mod 1.02 is working with 196.21 drivers, I've already saw user reports.
Zogrim 2 years ago
Thank you! I used a bit different method of fooling NV Control Panel. Anyways, thanks!
syso01 2 years ago
They could code it all to work off your CPU and not need the GPU for physx. The problem with that is nobody likes playing with 1-12fps...
archolon 2 years ago
10 fps,for those little fancy effects.
wildwolves8 2 years ago
sparks :(((
tcvjetk4 2 years ago
shit game fuck you
PLkurwa 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The game is mediocre and definitely not worth physx-wise. Don't think there has been a single game worth of the technology. Not even Batman. Batman AA is incredible, but not because of the "dynamic paper thingy" and breakable bathroom tiles; it's because it's a great game and period. The effects presented so far are nice and everything, but it's pure bollocks on the sense that ATI's can do the same job, but are nerfed software-side. This one won't be seeing my money.
henriquecsouza 2 years ago
you gotta be fuckin blind
DanielAvelan 2 years ago
Likewise, my rude little friend... likewise.
henriquecsouza 2 years ago
likewise my ass
DanielAvelan 2 years ago
Batman has way more than moving paper and breakable tiles. It had virtual cloth effects fog and steam effects and much more. It's called Immersion. Something fanboi's are to blind to see.
archolon 2 years ago
god so lame i can't use physx :(
Wesujin 2 years ago 2
Physx disabled does not look too bad. In my opinion, this is not a quantum leap in realistic graphics. Things like Global Illumination and Ambient Occlusion makes for the real, or at least much more realistic looking graphics. Realistic lighting is the most important issue in CGI.
listenwhatisayoh 2 years ago 2
only smoke .... i dont need this
Tehranor 2 years ago 2
man,physix off sucks
DanielAvelan 2 years ago
who the fuck needs that crap??
odis1232 2 years ago
the same way i dont need dx11 for now... oh wait.. nvidia already gets gddr5/10.1 cards so its just a matter of time till 11... just messing u.. go for hardcore games such fc2/crysis or even batman with physx give it a try and than post back... or perhaps u love cs and really dont care about it rite ? think so
blaze909 2 years ago
physx wins. flawless victory. sorry dx11/ati.
blaze909 2 years ago
ati is totally able to run that, nvidia just sponsored this game so :)
Shas221 2 years ago
how did u get this conclusion
blaze909 2 years ago
every card is capable of displaying a 100 extra particles when asked to... nothing special about physX just could marketing :)
Shas221 2 years ago
good...
Shas221 2 years ago
what ? where did u hear this ? and where is the source ? damn google
blaze909 2 years ago
Physx is a great idea if used correctly. Mirrors edge was a good example of that. more to the point, batman was a joy to play with it enabled.
just think about what sort of number crunching goes into real time physics?
LordNeb 2 years ago
nvidia sponsers the majority of the games. doesn't mean that ATI can't build the tech to go with it! all they have to do is buy it off of them or do the leg work with the R&D.
Opencl physx is supposed to be around the corner anyway. moving it away from the cuda platform.
Do your research and stop being an ATI fanboy.
LordNeb 2 years ago
@LordNeb ~ GF series ~ Eeee.T.A ~ super chipset ~ only 512 processors ~ what gives
TJae1 2 years ago
Ok sorry, it's PC version only, IMHO when people feels ok with console, it will be the same with PC
andreebdg 2 years ago 2
pocha qui bala
omaldoso1 2 years ago
good
220sanji 2 years ago
good video
yudmiy2 2 years ago 4
Wow plenty of Nvidia haters, and knowing how to "game programming (and effects)ROFL" won't get you physx, lol sorry HD 4890 dude no physx for you ( i still keep my HD4870 as back up, great lil card) just not possible with ATI ESPECIALLY since You need the LATEST PHYSX DRIVERS to get full blown physx HAHA! were is you'r patch now?! You'r only hope now is DX11 and i'm not seeing it pumping out physx level effects yet...
BendApparatus 2 years ago
Great video editing.
Einhanderkiller 2 years ago
Is it PC version or console? Are such effect comes to console too ? How...
andreebdg 2 years ago
@andreebdg PC. Console versions are equal to "PhysX Off" settings
Zogrim 2 years ago
LOOK AT THE DESCRIPTION
GPU accelerated physics effects in Dark Void for PC!!
Xbox or PS3 have no PhysX its for NVidia graphiccards up to GeForce 8xxx
Aliver87 2 years ago
fucking features which every fucking 2 years old graficcard can render, nvidia just sells grafic-effects as "physix" and every nv-fanboy loves that shit, I'm glad you can mod it and can use it even with ati-cards...
ShouTakumi 2 years ago
You can? Please tell me how, because I can activate the effect butï