Look at the arabic worrd Allah clearly visible in cloud formation going across the earth... These are the first pictures from space of earth and God partakes to us a standard miracle..
Along with the adhaan on the moon and the sight of 'an open book' it all points towards God. Even the words were recorded on tape. Look for yourself :
OK, brainiac, I'll try it again, with smaller words.
You said "rocket exhaust clearly visible, but you newer saw it on take off from the "moon" LMAO - same kinda fuel was used"
The only thing that took off from the moon was the LM, which used N2O4 and Aerozine 50.
The F-1 was only used on the first stage. Since we've just seen a stage jettisoned, we have to be viewing from the second or third, which used LOX/LH2. This is not the same fuel that was used by the LM to leave the moon
VACUUM is transparent, therefore will ALL rocket exhaust be visible in vacuum, white, red, yellow, u name it! there's no such thing as invisible exhausts
@xismxist Partially true. However, some fuels burn nearly transparently. Combined with the lack of pressure at altitude and beyond the atmosphere (causing the flame to widen and diffuse visibly) this can create the illusion that the thrust is transparent. After all, burning does not imply incandescence (which would indicate a low-efficency reaction)
@nesokretep I said that the stages of saturn v used different fuels. Stage two and three used another fuel than the first stage, thats what i said... i never said the LM used different fuels for each mission, which is what you try to state. but what to expect... quotemining is ofcourse your last chance, laughable!
@xismxist -- Didn't you read what I wrote? I was just quoting you.
You said (and I quote again):
"rocket exhaust clearly visible, but you newer saw it on take off from the "moon" LMAO - SAME KINDA FUEL was used"
.
You said the LM used the "same kinda fuel" (as in the video you were pointing out)
.
AND AFTER THAT you described the kind of fuel used in the staging video that you are watching, and you specifically stated DIFFERENT fuels than those used in the LM.
@nesokretep No, i never said that "the rocket in the staging video used DIFFERNT fuel from the LM" how many times must i repeat this? you must be a fakking moron
@xismxist -- Excuse me. I should be more careful with my wording.
You DID state that the fuel used in the staging video was the SAME as the LM.
You DID state positively what fuel was used in both stages in the staging video.
And the fuel that was used in the LM was, in fact, DIFFERENT from both fuels that you named.
So I guess instead of being ignorant of the content of your own posts, you are merely ignorant of the fuel used in the LM, even though the info is available from the same source
@xismxist -- And I was merely pointing out the humor of the fact that your contradiction (or the appearance of your ignorance, or what ever you wish to claim as the source for your discrepancy) was in your very next post.
@xismxist -- And no. There is NOWHERE in my post which indicates that I was trying to state that you said the "LM used different fuels for each mission."
My post does not mention anything being different for "each mission."
I merely quote YOU saying one thing in one post and the opposite thing in the very next post.
You are right although it could also have been Apollo6. The camera capsules were used because they were concerned the connector ring might not separate clean which could damage the engines. I beleive one of the four cameras used on the two missions never recovered from the ocean.
Why does this gigantic Saturn V apparently vanish just as this flaming skinless bass-drum-like object is being jetissoned?? And that thing is burning in space where there is no oxygen! Look out below!!
why the f should it skip ahead?? It doesn't look like that at all. Where's the unedited unabridged version of this footage where it doesn't skip ahead then? Conventional wisdom suggests a picture tells a 1000 words and all this picture tells us is "Neil Armstrong never landed on the moon" x 1000.
I don't know, why don't you find it. Conventional wisdom suggests this is from some sort of documentary, and so it probably wouldn't be the entire clip. Another reason why it would skip ahead is because of the length of time between each stage. Oh and another reason, theres likely a different camera for each stage. Think about it further than you have so far.
That's total rubbish. If the video was skipping ahead as you claim then we would notice changes in the altitude in relation to the planet. Why would there be another camera for each stage? So you are saying Neil Armstrong may have actually landed moon? Impossible.
1: The further away from the planet you travel the less change in relative altitude you see due to its size. In order the see a major change in such altitude would mean the rocket would have to travel much faster however at this stage of the launch its engines aren't even in use anymore. As far as the camera goes, I'd imagine you would need a different one considering the last camera would be with the the last stage which would be burning up at that point. Oh and sure why not, Neils the man.
Yeah, we also have to remember that the time from S-1C cutoff&staging -- S-II interstage ring -- S-II stage ignition is not very long, it happens during a matter of seconds.. You can see the whole sequence in some other videos here on youtube, although its kinda difficult to see the interstage ring tho.
The audio is obviously from Apollo 11, but I think the video is actually from an unmanned Apollo mission, probably Apollo 4. Of course this is just a minor point because Apollo 11 would have looked almost identical.
Sure.........
Alexvideoclip 9 months ago
Look at the arabic worrd Allah clearly visible in cloud formation going across the earth... These are the first pictures from space of earth and God partakes to us a standard miracle..
Along with the adhaan on the moon and the sight of 'an open book' it all points towards God. Even the words were recorded on tape. Look for yourself :
mynameisabu1 1 year ago
rocket exhaust clearly visible, but you newer saw it on take off from the "moon" LMAO - same kinda fuel was used
xismxist 2 years ago
wrong. LH2 and lox on the second and third stages of apollo, nitrogen tetroxide and Aerozine 50 used in the LM.
If you can't get the basic stuff right, why should anyone give any of your "proof" any weight?
almostfm 2 years ago
omg! your fuckface.... second and third stage of "apollo"? saturv v used 2 kinda fuels:
J-2: LOX/LH2
F-1: LOX/RP-1
xismxist 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OK, brainiac, I'll try it again, with smaller words.
You said "rocket exhaust clearly visible, but you newer saw it on take off from the "moon" LMAO - same kinda fuel was used"
The only thing that took off from the moon was the LM, which used N2O4 and Aerozine 50.
The F-1 was only used on the first stage. Since we've just seen a stage jettisoned, we have to be viewing from the second or third, which used LOX/LH2. This is not the same fuel that was used by the LM to leave the moon
almostfm 2 years ago
VACUUM is transparent, therefore will ALL rocket exhaust be visible in vacuum, white, red, yellow, u name it! there's no such thing as invisible exhausts
xismxist 2 years ago
@xismxist Partially true. However, some fuels burn nearly transparently. Combined with the lack of pressure at altitude and beyond the atmosphere (causing the flame to widen and diffuse visibly) this can create the illusion that the thrust is transparent. After all, burning does not imply incandescence (which would indicate a low-efficency reaction)
okankyoto 1 year ago
@xismxist -- OK. So first you say that the LM used the same kind of fuel, and then you say that the LM did not use the same kind of fuel.
I guess your "proof" of a "hoax" is really just a joke.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep What are you talking about your idiot? when and where did i say that? BRING UP OR SHUTUP
xismxist 1 year ago
@xismxist -YOU said: "rocket exhaust clearly visible, but you newer saw it on take off from the "moon" LMAO - SAME KINDA FUEL was used"
And THEN you said: "omg! your fuckface.... second and third stage of "apollo"? saturv v used 2 kinda fuels:
J-2: LOX/LH2
F-1: LOX/RP-1"
(the "take-off from the moon" used Aerozine 50 / nitrogen tetroxide)
So ... either (1) you don't know what you're talking about or else (2) you don't know what you're talking about.
(And you call ME an "idiot"... funny)
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep I said that the stages of saturn v used different fuels. Stage two and three used another fuel than the first stage, thats what i said... i never said the LM used different fuels for each mission, which is what you try to state. but what to expect... quotemining is ofcourse your last chance, laughable!
xismxist 1 year ago
@xismxist -- Didn't you read what I wrote? I was just quoting you.
You said (and I quote again):
"rocket exhaust clearly visible, but you newer saw it on take off from the "moon" LMAO - SAME KINDA FUEL was used"
.
You said the LM used the "same kinda fuel" (as in the video you were pointing out)
.
AND AFTER THAT you described the kind of fuel used in the staging video that you are watching, and you specifically stated DIFFERENT fuels than those used in the LM.
nesokretep 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nesokretep here we go again....
xismxist 1 year ago
@xismxist -- Apparently we don't "go again;"
Because either you don't understand what you yourself said in a previous post, or else you enjoy contradicting yourself.
Again:
You said the rocket in the staging video used the "same kind of fuel" (as the LM)
And then you said the rocket in the staging video used DIFFERNT fuel from the LM.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep No, i never said that "the rocket in the staging video used DIFFERNT fuel from the LM" how many times must i repeat this? you must be a fakking moron
xismxist 1 year ago
@xismxist -- Excuse me. I should be more careful with my wording.
You DID state that the fuel used in the staging video was the SAME as the LM.
You DID state positively what fuel was used in both stages in the staging video.
And the fuel that was used in the LM was, in fact, DIFFERENT from both fuels that you named.
So I guess instead of being ignorant of the content of your own posts, you are merely ignorant of the fuel used in the LM, even though the info is available from the same source
nesokretep 1 year ago
@xismxist -- And I was merely pointing out the humor of the fact that your contradiction (or the appearance of your ignorance, or what ever you wish to claim as the source for your discrepancy) was in your very next post.
I just thought it was funny is all ...
No big deal.
nesokretep 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ain'ts thy bitches hadded thyse trailers hitches, we hadded try ain'ts why
SeeProfileForDetails 11 months ago
@xismxist -- And no. There is NOWHERE in my post which indicates that I was trying to state that you said the "LM used different fuels for each mission."
My post does not mention anything being different for "each mission."
I merely quote YOU saying one thing in one post and the opposite thing in the very next post.
nesokretep 1 year ago
this video is from apollo 4 not apollo 11.
I'm pretty sure they only found the camera equipment from the staging from apollo 4
sja11 2 years ago
@sja11
You are right although it could also have been Apollo6. The camera capsules were used because they were concerned the connector ring might not separate clean which could damage the engines. I beleive one of the four cameras used on the two missions never recovered from the ocean.
tpsossff 1 year ago
Why does this gigantic Saturn V apparently vanish just as this flaming skinless bass-drum-like object is being jetissoned?? And that thing is burning in space where there is no oxygen! Look out below!!
tanriovert 3 years ago
The video skips ahead to the next stage so it looks like it disappears, its burning momentarily due to remaining fuel inside it probably.
europeantheater 3 years ago
why the f should it skip ahead?? It doesn't look like that at all. Where's the unedited unabridged version of this footage where it doesn't skip ahead then? Conventional wisdom suggests a picture tells a 1000 words and all this picture tells us is "Neil Armstrong never landed on the moon" x 1000.
tanriovert 3 years ago
I don't know, why don't you find it. Conventional wisdom suggests this is from some sort of documentary, and so it probably wouldn't be the entire clip. Another reason why it would skip ahead is because of the length of time between each stage. Oh and another reason, theres likely a different camera for each stage. Think about it further than you have so far.
europeantheater 3 years ago
That's total rubbish. If the video was skipping ahead as you claim then we would notice changes in the altitude in relation to the planet. Why would there be another camera for each stage? So you are saying Neil Armstrong may have actually landed moon? Impossible.
tanriovert 3 years ago
1: The further away from the planet you travel the less change in relative altitude you see due to its size. In order the see a major change in such altitude would mean the rocket would have to travel much faster however at this stage of the launch its engines aren't even in use anymore. As far as the camera goes, I'd imagine you would need a different one considering the last camera would be with the the last stage which would be burning up at that point. Oh and sure why not, Neils the man.
europeantheater 3 years ago
To simplify what I mean about the change in altitude, it's called the Theory of Relativity.
europeantheater 3 years ago
Yeah, we also have to remember that the time from S-1C cutoff&staging -- S-II interstage ring -- S-II stage ignition is not very long, it happens during a matter of seconds.. You can see the whole sequence in some other videos here on youtube, although its kinda difficult to see the interstage ring tho.
RickyboyH 2 years ago
The audio is obviously from Apollo 11, but I think the video is actually from an unmanned Apollo mission, probably Apollo 4. Of course this is just a minor point because Apollo 11 would have looked almost identical.
jamesbooty 3 years ago