Without a fully legislated community supported 100% Congressional Amnesty to protect any of the guilty from ignorant prosecution after they try to tell the truth nothing good &\or true will happen & everything bad Alex Jones rants on about is certain.
Some people in the system tried hard to screw the 911 black-op from the inside yet America remains like a blind deluded wounded giant stumbling around while looking for someone to butt-fcuk in vengeance because they went to sleep since the 60's.
These traitors are busted. I'll bet they never thought the people would keep this alive for 10 years. And the bastards are still tryin to cover it up. Did you see that surprise move about 6 months ago by the Pentagon, they bought up all 10,000 1st run copies of Lt. Col. Schaffer's book and burned them to keep people from knowing about info that was kept out of the 9,11 report? What's it going to take for the people to say enough is a enough? And 9,11 is tiny compared to some of their other shit.
Hard proof this is not. No attempt is made to examine the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction. What we do know is that all the elements necessary for this to happen were a part of the towers construction, and in very large quantities. We also know that much of construction material was quite literally turned to dust (despite the fancy name that's all nano-particles are). So common, Occam's Razor people.
@Idiotsmakemesad@Idiotsmakemesad You say, "No attempt is made to examine the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction."...
That's like a homicide investigator saying, "let's examine the alternative hypothesis that the knife entered the victim on it's own." That's not science. That's instead, wishing an uncomfortable truth weren't true. That's religion. It's the domain of cowards. Certainly NOT Occam's Razor.
What elements from the construction made the towers explode? …and "turn to dust" as you say?
Occam's razor?? To deny your own eyes violates that theorem in it's essence.
Bull shit. This stuff(thermate) cannot be formed by natural collapse and processes. It depraves the first law of THERMODYNAMICS. GO to school and learn some science!
If in a match head is sulphur, nitrate etc and also in the WTC1/2 than by collapse there are not spontaneous matchheads formed. This stuf is made inlayers of nano dimensions. This ONLY can be made(and i,m SURE 100%) its made in military labs or factories!
@Idiotsmakemesad Nano combinations of chemicals are the signature of a manufacturing process.It's nano technology - specific blends of materials (in set ratios throughout a substance) can never occur by accident.
So we can expect to find evidence of this in previous "destruction" or was that a Freudian slip?
Show me ONE building "pancake" pre or post 9/11 that had the entirety of it's contents rendered into confetti and dust then you'll have your control group to test this brilliant hypothesis of yours.
@Idiotsmakemesad Mark Basile: "One of the things that i'd like to stress about these chips is that they really shouldn't be there. There are not a natural formed agglomeration of aluminum from the aircraft, or materials that were in the building, and iron oxide that got knocked off... These chips are not naturally occurring, they are not going to form because some materials fall down in a building and touch each other, and get compressed together, that's just not what this material is."
speaking from some 50-100,000 hours of field experience ( no degree ) to "pulverize" an entire floor of concrete in 800 ms would raise improbable countervailent proofs - the resultant kinetic energy would place material some 1000 m from origin / doing so for each floor at near free-fall velocity would weaken underlying structure. ( for my benefit, what's the cite on the Springer-Verlag book on this )
Have you looked through Prof. Harrit's CV? Is there anything in his published work BEFORE his thermite paper that would cause anyone to question either his honesty or his competence? If so, please cite some published work to support your criticisms.
The NIST report and 911 Commission Report are most certainly government cover ups. I work for state law enforcement in the field of Arson and Explosives for 25 years now and this atrocity violates all of the basic rules of physics and fire science if you even consider the Bush Administration propaganda. Thermite is a cutting charge used in demolition and burns at 4100 degrees, hence the melted steel at the base of the towers. The numerous predicating circumstances connecting Bushs and Bin Ladens
Go to my channel, to see fresh interview with Niels Harrit, the main author and chemist from Denmark. Great interview from Danish news with english subs - truth is about to break the ice :)
once the iron, the reaction product of thermite at temps of over 4500 degrees began to run to pooling spots in the debris field, it didnt need anything to keep it molten.
like a cup of hot coffee it maintains its tempature and cools at a certain rate even a cup of coffee is too hot to drink for a minute or two
at 4500 degrees plus, it had almost 2000 degrees to cool before it would solidify!
at those tremendous temps it had time to run and pool in insulated pockets in the debris field
I hear you. I'm always intrigued how some people latch onto certain, especially 9/11, videos and troll them with unsubstantive namecalling argumentative incendiary comments as if it were their JOB or something. I've had several of these trolls on my anti-zionist, anti-carbon tax & Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon vids. 8 years later & our borders are still wide open. I'm just waiting on the next sure to come false-flag terrorist attack since I'm sure terrorist have followed the tons of drugs.
CyberCilypudi - Ironic that you said "as if it were their JOB". Why? Because it LITERALLY is their job. Haven't you read any articles or seen some video on government shills (paid disinfo agents). The government spends millions on these people every year to lie to us and put out government progaganda. You must question everything and everyone--do your research and know what is going on. We live in an age of deceit and propaganda. 9/11 is a lie, just like global warming.
-.- well it is certainly not impossible the good old keep em small and dumb solution ^^ if they start to say something against the gov they are all traitors or terrorists or both :D
i have seen a real nice presentation about how our finance system works in short terms = no debt = no money
you could find on every dollar a statement like :this can be exchanged for gold in every bank now it says: this is a legal tender with which u can pay your debts :D
the euro doesn´t even fullfill the criteria of a banknote so ? it´s forged money :D
an the best thing is that the dollar is the reserve currency if it crashes everything else will also do so ^^
then you start asking yourself WTF are the politicians discussing on their conferences ? :D many people say the politicians are dumb BUT they aren´t dumb they are the best politicians ever you just have to look and see which interests they represent ^^
Try googling the 3 articles by Manuel Garcia titled 'The Physics of 9/11'.He's physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California with a PhD Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, from Princeton.
He's a smart guy with qualifications relevant to the subject. I found the articles informative.
Manuel Garcia's paper that alienentity referred to attempts to explain the collapse of the WTC towers without explosives.
David Griscom's rebuttal destroys Garcia's analysis. Garcia must have been paid, bribed, or be incredibly stupid (unlikely) to have believed what he wrote.
Jones says that these chips are unreacted superthermite, that means these chips still contain a lotta energy.
He talks about very fine aluminium particles present in the dust. A fingerprint, I mean, the word says enough I think. It's consistent with what we saw happening to these 2 towers, and probably to wtc7.
Could one get their hands on some nanothermite to examine if the application of it to steel beams and furniture etc. produces the same kind of endproducts (ash containing these chips and all the other elements found) as the ones they have examined?
Of course, the hypothesis that gravity and some fire and damage caused the sudden rapid disintegration of these 2 towers can be flushed down the toilet after looking at it for one second.
I think when enough New Yorkers get wind of this it'll ignite like a keg of "thermite".. Mess with NY!!! Plz...Meanwhile the media will suppress this as long as they can. After all they own that industry right...Now they will use the threat of securiety as a way to censor the internet... wake up "sheeple" you've been had and continue to let them get away with it. see "Obama Deception" on you tube before it gets censored...
so pls tell me what caused molten metal and those huge dust clouds i want to know how this happened i give a shit about jones... it just doesn´t add up what had the energy to shoot out steel columns in other buildings and why did wtc7 collapse in 7 secs? due to a small fire ... i just want some answers
the things which happened after 9/11 are horrible.. their excuse: america strikes back and the evil terrorist well are the americans than any better then the terrorists?
The molten metal reports are difficult to confirm. Molten steel would have to be above 1550 Celsius, which would be almost white hot.
If stuff is glowing reddish, that's not hot enough, although Brass, Lead, Aluminum and Zinc I believe would be molten above 500 or 600 celsius ( 1100 F)
I don't think hot debris fires are proof of thermite at all. More precisely, hot fires could be caused by other materials, including oils and diesel fuel, plastics etc..
I specifically did not say "molten metal" as that is a distractor. I asked about the sustained ground temps >1200 F for two months afterwards as documented by NASA thermal satellite imagery. The temps persisted despite a billon gallons of water & "pyrotech foam" being saturated into the rubble. We agree that the smoldering materials consisted of gypsum wallboard, plastic office machines and wires, carpeting and paper and the like do we not? How could that stuff be a catalyst even in a huge pile?
Also the very chemical composition of this material is fairly consistent with other known materials which were in the buildings - namely primer paint used in the 1960's.
It is known that there is quite a lot of zinc and barium in the dust, as Dr. Jones has pointed out previously.
But he's backing away from those things now, because they are not consistently found in the chips.
In a way, he's got it covered either way: barium present? Must be thermite. No barium? Must be thermite. y'see?
In your exchange with ThisWeekInFascism, you were mostly correct. However, the chemical energy released isn't the same if a different % of the molecules react.
Truthers don't need to come up with an exact theory of the crime to prove Muslims/Arabs didn't pull off 9-11. There shouldn't have been any unreacted thermitic material incorporating nanotechnology in the WTC dust. And WTC7 shouldn't have been able to fall with the acceleration of gravity for 2.25 secs.
I wonder how long those among us that have never taken a second look at 9/11 can keep their heads in the sand? I guess that depends on when the 'majority' takes up the issue.
Hopefully the tipping point will come sooner than later.
JREFers are a laughing stock, just ignore them. They are just too cowardly to face the truth that 9/11 was indeed an inside job. Many JREFers are just shills paid to spread disinformation and the others are idiot followers. Always remember where they stood on 9/11 and how they tried to cover-up the truth. They are traitors to America. JREFers are SCUM.
In conclusion, this material, whatever label you give it - 'nanothermite' 'paint' 'red chips' etc.. simply doesn't have the energy density, applied as thinly as it was (like a primer paint) to do anything to steel.
Jones appears to be debunking his own theory, although he doesn't seem to realize it yet.
Read the paper. The smaller the refinement of the aluminum and oxide powder, the greater the energy. Remember the Anthrax terrorist story in 2001? That particular Anthrax was more potent because it was smaller and more refined. It is estimated that 10 tons of nanothermite ("red chips"/ "super-thermite") was in the buildings.
According to the Navys Small Business Innovation Research, super-thermite "is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services.
A DOD report from 2002: Nanoenergetics: An Emerging Technology Area of National Importance
"At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nano- materials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explo- sives...nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons..."
I don't get it. I wrote 'ThisWeek - the chemical energy is the same, no matter what size the particles are. The difference is in the speed of the reaction.'
You respond 'exactly wrong'. Yet that's exactly what the paper says - it's the rate of release that is different.
Why can't you guys just accept a fact? I don't understand this.
I thought this was about looking for the truth, not scapegoats and myths.
I've read through your comments & agree that Dr. Jones needs to allow others to review the report. Since you seem to have a genuine interest in the truth, I would be interested on your take on how the ground temps. at all three sites maintained such high temps for two months after the collapses. I have a college degree and plenty of chemistry and physics & I've never heard a valid explanation. Watch this video I compiled, and tell whe how this happens from office fires:
@alienentity -- Well actually, a debris pile comprised of ordinary materials found in an office-tower lacks sufficiently dense, highly-reactive fuels capable of achieving & radiating the enormous thermal temps recorded. Rivers & pools of semi-molten steel from superthermite reactions are energetic enough to cause depolymerization, breaking of molecular bonds within debris, freeing organic volatiles and oxygen to drive further combustion (violent oxidation).
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
dailypaul. com/node/88685
It's finallly over. I has been proved. 9/11, indeed, was demolition. Now, who did it? This material is traceable and the number one connection is the military. Did you know that 2.5 trillion dollars went missing from the military shortly before 9/11?
'It's finallly over. I has been proved' I think that statement is very premature.
There are several fundamental problems with the grey/red chips.
1) Jones et al did not compare these to a sample of WTC primer paint to eliminate that paint as the source.
2) Original primer paint contains several elements that Jones found on the chips but assumed were contaminants: calcium, sulfur, zinc, chromium and potassium.
Zinc and Chromium in particular are in primer paint, along with all the things in chips
Sorry, in the ORIGINAL specs for primer, not necessarily current paints. this is an important distinction.
3) The energy release of Jones' red chips varies considerably, even EXCEEDING thermite. This means that it contains more energy density, so it probably isn't thermite at all.
(since explosives carry their own oxidants, the total energy density is lower than say, paint or paper by a considerable margin)
4) In 2007 Jones stated that the chips were in 100% of their samples.
4) In 2007 Jones stated that the chips were in 100% of their samples. The statistcal chances of this happening are near zero, so this indicates that either the samples were tampered with, or that the material from which the chips came was almost universally applied to WTC towers.
That points to primer paint, which contains all the elements found in Jones' red chips, including Zinc and Chromium.
5) This finding has NOT been corroborated by any other independent group of scientists, nor has it had a chance to be criticized properly.
Jones is getting WAY ahead of the science and is engaging in a PR campaign to sell this idea. I think it's likely this will backfire eventually.
ps, several physicists have looked at the molecular energy potential of this material and concluded that it could only raise the temp of steel beams by perhaps 10 to 25 Degrees Kelvin. Very slightly...
You JREFfers are protesting way to much, and howling at the moon, as if the moon is listening to anything you're saying anymore. Your echo chamber is stupefying you.
Stop kicking, obfuscating, rationalizing and screaming, write a rebuttal, publish it in Bentham, and only then will we listen to anything you dumbunkers have to say.
I can't wait to read your peer reviewed rebuttal. It will be easy to disprove this latest finding, no? Bentham peer review process is non existent, no? Ready? Go!
nnNo let's just focus on 9/11 and don't get stupid statements about IDS and other loony distractions take over the conversation of my beloved WTC and a friend from grammar school, FDNY, vaporized. Are there still >900 people undiscovered in the dust?
Without a fully legislated community supported 100% Congressional Amnesty to protect any of the guilty from ignorant prosecution after they try to tell the truth nothing good &\or true will happen & everything bad Alex Jones rants on about is certain.
Some people in the system tried hard to screw the 911 black-op from the inside yet America remains like a blind deluded wounded giant stumbling around while looking for someone to butt-fcuk in vengeance because they went to sleep since the 60's.
spacelizardlaw 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
9/11/2011 - Ten Years, No Justice
/watch?v=FxPaebHe3fw
911debunkerschannel 4 months ago in playlist More videos from ThisWeekInFascism
theres no were to hide now, the truth is out and the official fairy tale is finished.
chronotek2009 8 months ago
These traitors are busted. I'll bet they never thought the people would keep this alive for 10 years. And the bastards are still tryin to cover it up. Did you see that surprise move about 6 months ago by the Pentagon, they bought up all 10,000 1st run copies of Lt. Col. Schaffer's book and burned them to keep people from knowing about info that was kept out of the 9,11 report? What's it going to take for the people to say enough is a enough? And 9,11 is tiny compared to some of their other shit.
HemiHead66 10 months ago
Nanothermite is used for one thing only
.Demolition and destruction.
Its not just lying around anywhere and is strictly controlled .
Only top government and military officials have acces to it.
Its also very expensive.
Arabs with box cutters wouldnt have had it.
Since it was indisputably there at the wtc site how does any debunker explain its presence?
Anyone?
zenoist2 1 year ago 3
Hard proof this is not. No attempt is made to examine the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction. What we do know is that all the elements necessary for this to happen were a part of the towers construction, and in very large quantities. We also know that much of construction material was quite literally turned to dust (despite the fancy name that's all nano-particles are). So common, Occam's Razor people.
Idiotsmakemesad 1 year ago
@Idiotsmakemesad @Idiotsmakemesad You say, "No attempt is made to examine the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction."...
cont'd
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago
That's like a homicide investigator saying, "let's examine the alternative hypothesis that the knife entered the victim on it's own." That's not science. That's instead, wishing an uncomfortable truth weren't true. That's religion. It's the domain of cowards. Certainly NOT Occam's Razor.
What elements from the construction made the towers explode? …and "turn to dust" as you say?
Occam's razor?? To deny your own eyes violates that theorem in it's essence.
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago 3
@ThisWeekInFascism
@Idiotsmakemesad
Bull shit. This stuff(thermate) cannot be formed by natural collapse and processes. It depraves the first law of THERMODYNAMICS. GO to school and learn some science!
If in a match head is sulphur, nitrate etc and also in the WTC1/2 than by collapse there are not spontaneous matchheads formed. This stuf is made inlayers of nano dimensions. This ONLY can be made(and i,m SURE 100%) its made in military labs or factories!
IXION11111 8 months ago
@Idiotsmakemesad lol @"the probability of the alternative hypothesis that these particles formed naturally in the process of the towers destruction."
They should have looked for diamonds formed in the process as well then I guess after all carbon was being crushed by huge weights.
Sorry to disillusion you but nano thermite is a very high tech substance with restricted acces.
Only top govt and top military have access to it.
Doesnt that tell you something?
zenoist2 1 year ago 3
@Idiotsmakemesad Nano combinations of chemicals are the signature of a manufacturing process.It's nano technology - specific blends of materials (in set ratios throughout a substance) can never occur by accident.
stratocaster539 1 year ago 4
@Idiotsmakemesad ...And another scientist has proven nanothermite in the dust.
/watch?v=frIpyTBAV_Y
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago
@Idiotsmakemesad "that these particles formed naturally"
Wow, really?
So we can expect to find evidence of this in previous "destruction" or was that a Freudian slip?
Show me ONE building "pancake" pre or post 9/11 that had the entirety of it's contents rendered into confetti and dust then you'll have your control group to test this brilliant hypothesis of yours.
I'm waiting with 'baited breath'.
GnosticNinja 1 year ago
@Idiotsmakemesad Mark Basile: "One of the things that i'd like to stress about these chips is that they really shouldn't be there. There are not a natural formed agglomeration of aluminum from the aircraft, or materials that were in the building, and iron oxide that got knocked off... These chips are not naturally occurring, they are not going to form because some materials fall down in a building and touch each other, and get compressed together, that's just not what this material is."
TehBren 11 months ago
There weren't even any planes.
DrBrainFood 1 year ago
take over the media and tell some truth.
beastshawnee 1 year ago
SO NOW we all Know it was a Set-up! now what are we going to do about it?
blackArt2000 1 year ago 4
TRW made sol-gel nano therimtes
and seems strange the military complex
had bought out all there stocks 6 months before 911
sol-get can be sprayed or painted on
and cuts @3000c
and the actuators where purchased too
and laser beam can set it off too
but i can see how ez to apply and use
it can be sprayed all over everything
that would make concrete pulverize
waterchildtera 1 year ago 2
speaking from some 50-100,000 hours of field experience ( no degree ) to "pulverize" an entire floor of concrete in 800 ms would raise improbable countervailent proofs - the resultant kinetic energy would place material some 1000 m from origin / doing so for each floor at near free-fall velocity would weaken underlying structure. ( for my benefit, what's the cite on the Springer-Verlag book on this )
pzmtuthcvpvl 1 year ago
Interesting. What if the kinetic energy was able to be directed downward for each floor?
ThisWeekInFascism 1 year ago
Nanothermite patent
Patent description -
PRS Date: 1997/07/22
PRS Code: AS02
EFFECTIVE DATE: 1996/07/15
Abstract of US5885321
Fine aluminum powders are prepared by decomposing alane-adducts in organic
solvents under an inert atmosphere to provide highly uniform particles selectably
sized from about 65 nm to about 500 nm and believed particularly effective as fuels
and additives, in pyrotechnics, and in energetic materials including composites, superthermite, and other explosives.
whisperycat 2 years ago
When we going to bring these criminals to justice?All evidences is there,they lied to us and all world,killed a lot of people.They deserve to die.
98521frukt 2 years ago 5
@frukt I second that
a2zhandi 1 year ago
@a2zhandi I third that!
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
Now the proof !! one day those fuckers will pay and those who face the evidence will no longer be considered stupid hysterical conspiracy obsecced
LedSlash71 2 years ago
I will be really surprised if even this is enough to wake up the morons in congress.
I guess they need to find a chip with Chenney's finger print on it for anything to happen.
zarni000 2 years ago
Hello chemists!
Have you looked through Prof. Harrit's CV? Is there anything in his published work BEFORE his thermite paper that would cause anyone to question either his honesty or his competence? If so, please cite some published work to support your criticisms.
Thanks!
Skeptic121 2 years ago
The NIST report and 911 Commission Report are most certainly government cover ups. I work for state law enforcement in the field of Arson and Explosives for 25 years now and this atrocity violates all of the basic rules of physics and fire science if you even consider the Bush Administration propaganda. Thermite is a cutting charge used in demolition and burns at 4100 degrees, hence the melted steel at the base of the towers. The numerous predicating circumstances connecting Bushs and Bin Ladens
gibder1117 2 years ago 4
Go to my channel, to see fresh interview with Niels Harrit, the main author and chemist from Denmark. Great interview from Danish news with english subs - truth is about to break the ice :)
BudhistPanda 2 years ago 37
the
loaded
gun
acrobat741 2 years ago 4
once the iron, the reaction product of thermite at temps of over 4500 degrees began to run to pooling spots in the debris field, it didnt need anything to keep it molten.
like a cup of hot coffee it maintains its tempature and cools at a certain rate even a cup of coffee is too hot to drink for a minute or two
at 4500 degrees plus, it had almost 2000 degrees to cool before it would solidify!
at those tremendous temps it had time to run and pool in insulated pockets in the debris field
capelipl 2 years ago 4
is some shill trying to direct truthseeker toward official govt science sites,LOL
this science is tainted garbage like soviet science was or nazi science was
the science of political agenda
dismissed by all clear headded people
who dont have the agenda bug up the ass like the borg shill "grey "
very smooth he keeps saying come on guy see what i just found!
you betcha!
cheap hollywood that exactly supports the official fascist story of the complicit govts of israel and the usa
capelipl 2 years ago
^^ i´m not convinced that fast but thanks for the warning :D
birserk 2 years ago
I hear you. I'm always intrigued how some people latch onto certain, especially 9/11, videos and troll them with unsubstantive namecalling argumentative incendiary comments as if it were their JOB or something. I've had several of these trolls on my anti-zionist, anti-carbon tax & Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon vids. 8 years later & our borders are still wide open. I'm just waiting on the next sure to come false-flag terrorist attack since I'm sure terrorist have followed the tons of drugs.
CyberCilypudi 2 years ago
Comment removed
Gilgamesh73 2 years ago
CyberCilypudi - Ironic that you said "as if it were their JOB". Why? Because it LITERALLY is their job. Haven't you read any articles or seen some video on government shills (paid disinfo agents). The government spends millions on these people every year to lie to us and put out government progaganda. You must question everything and everyone--do your research and know what is going on. We live in an age of deceit and propaganda. 9/11 is a lie, just like global warming.
Gilgamesh73 2 years ago 24
-.- well it is certainly not impossible the good old keep em small and dumb solution ^^ if they start to say something against the gov they are all traitors or terrorists or both :D
birserk 2 years ago 4
i have seen a real nice presentation about how our finance system works in short terms = no debt = no money
you could find on every dollar a statement like :this can be exchanged for gold in every bank now it says: this is a legal tender with which u can pay your debts :D
the euro doesn´t even fullfill the criteria of a banknote so ? it´s forged money :D
an the best thing is that the dollar is the reserve currency if it crashes everything else will also do so ^^
birserk 2 years ago
then you start asking yourself WTF are the politicians discussing on their conferences ? :D many people say the politicians are dumb BUT they aren´t dumb they are the best politicians ever you just have to look and see which interests they represent ^^
birserk 2 years ago 13
Have a good day everyone, I'll check back later. Let's share ideas and try to learn.
peace
alienentity 2 years ago
Try googling the 3 articles by Manuel Garcia titled 'The Physics of 9/11'.He's physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California with a PhD Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, from Princeton.
He's a smart guy with qualifications relevant to the subject. I found the articles informative.
alienentity 2 years ago
Manuel Garcia's paper(s) are total rubbish.
You would probably need some math background to follow the rebuttal written by David L Griscom entitled ,
'Hand Waving the Physics of 9/11'
IWETF 2 years ago
the
loaded
gun
GovernmentGoneWild 2 years ago 14
Manuel Garcia's paper that alienentity referred to attempts to explain the collapse of the WTC towers without explosives.
David Griscom's rebuttal destroys Garcia's analysis. Garcia must have been paid, bribed, or be incredibly stupid (unlikely) to have believed what he wrote.
IWETF 2 years ago 11
watch?v=0NjwjFu8TRc&feature=related
birserk 2 years ago
Jones says that these chips are unreacted superthermite, that means these chips still contain a lotta energy.
He talks about very fine aluminium particles present in the dust. A fingerprint, I mean, the word says enough I think. It's consistent with what we saw happening to these 2 towers, and probably to wtc7.
Sandberg1972 2 years ago 2
alienentity has some good points.
Could one get their hands on some nanothermite to examine if the application of it to steel beams and furniture etc. produces the same kind of endproducts (ash containing these chips and all the other elements found) as the ones they have examined?
Of course, the hypothesis that gravity and some fire and damage caused the sudden rapid disintegration of these 2 towers can be flushed down the toilet after looking at it for one second.
Sandberg1972 2 years ago
!"nanothermite"! It's like finding the creator's of the NWO!
GoldenFireReviews 2 years ago 2
Thermite evidence news up on Alex Jones website now.
Steenville 2 years ago
I think when enough New Yorkers get wind of this it'll ignite like a keg of "thermite".. Mess with NY!!! Plz...Meanwhile the media will suppress this as long as they can. After all they own that industry right...Now they will use the threat of securiety as a way to censor the internet... wake up "sheeple" you've been had and continue to let them get away with it. see "Obama Deception" on you tube before it gets censored...
flyzerogravity 2 years ago
In other words, Jones ALWAYS seems to find thermate/thermite, no matter what is actually presented.
Got sulphur? It's thermate. No sulphur? Thermite.
And so on. Since the composition of thermite is so nebulous, you don't even need much aluminum if at all.
All you really need to go this route is some Iron mixed with pretty much whatever you like, and Jones will call it 'thermite'.
It's a bit of a chemical shell game at this point.
alienentity 2 years ago
i think it´s likely that there were some kind of explosives = large dust clouds and thermite = molten metal .......
birserk 2 years ago 2
so pls tell me what caused molten metal and those huge dust clouds i want to know how this happened i give a shit about jones... it just doesn´t add up what had the energy to shoot out steel columns in other buildings and why did wtc7 collapse in 7 secs? due to a small fire ... i just want some answers
the things which happened after 9/11 are horrible.. their excuse: america strikes back and the evil terrorist well are the americans than any better then the terrorists?
birserk 2 years ago 4
The molten metal reports are difficult to confirm. Molten steel would have to be above 1550 Celsius, which would be almost white hot.
If stuff is glowing reddish, that's not hot enough, although Brass, Lead, Aluminum and Zinc I believe would be molten above 500 or 600 celsius ( 1100 F)
I don't think hot debris fires are proof of thermite at all. More precisely, hot fires could be caused by other materials, including oils and diesel fuel, plastics etc..
alienentity 2 years ago
I specifically did not say "molten metal" as that is a distractor. I asked about the sustained ground temps >1200 F for two months afterwards as documented by NASA thermal satellite imagery. The temps persisted despite a billon gallons of water & "pyrotech foam" being saturated into the rubble. We agree that the smoldering materials consisted of gypsum wallboard, plastic office machines and wires, carpeting and paper and the like do we not? How could that stuff be a catalyst even in a huge pile?
CyberCilypudi 2 years ago
Also the very chemical composition of this material is fairly consistent with other known materials which were in the buildings - namely primer paint used in the 1960's.
It is known that there is quite a lot of zinc and barium in the dust, as Dr. Jones has pointed out previously.
But he's backing away from those things now, because they are not consistently found in the chips.
In a way, he's got it covered either way: barium present? Must be thermite. No barium? Must be thermite. y'see?
alienentity 2 years ago
Further questions which need addressing:
In 2007 Dr. Jones had 4 dust samples, which he said EACH contained the grey/red chips.
What is the statistical probability that of only 4 random samples, EACH would contain this material?
Pretty damn small, almost zero, I wager.
It is much more likely that the grey/red material is something very common in WTC towers - it has to be, otherwise it wouldn't show up everywhere.
alienentity 2 years ago
I'm not saying one way or another that nanothermite paint couldn't exist.
But again, no one has actually tested the behavior of such an alleged compound on vertical structural steel, or welded joints and what-have-you.
Therefore it is an unknown whether it would actually be effective in destroying steel.
To merely assume that it would is extremely UNscientific, don't you think?
Conclusion: it is way too soon to consider this matter settled. It isn't. And there are many, many questions yet.
alienentity 2 years ago
Science is a truther and can be nothing else.
SpudXXXX 2 years ago 4
The paper says on page 20 or 25,
"Super-thermites, formed by mixing
of aluminum and metal oxide nanopowders result in energy release RATE by two orders of
magnitude higher than similar mixtures consisting of micron size reactants"
So nano thermates have a higher power (energy per time) output, but not necessarily a higher total energy output.
The so-called debunkers used the less explosive properties of non-nano thermate in various arguments. Now that's been refuted.
IWETF 2 years ago
'So nano thermates have a higher power (energy per time) output, but not necessarily a higher total energy output.'
Exactly what has been said earlier and elsewhere. The chemical energy available is exactly the same, but the release rate is higher.
What does this mean? It means that nanothermite acts more like a high explosive like conventional TNT.
If you apply a thin, paint-like coating of it, what does that actually do?
Truthers need to examine that before jumping to conclusions. Unknown.
alienentity 2 years ago
In your exchange with ThisWeekInFascism, you were mostly correct. However, the chemical energy released isn't the same if a different % of the molecules react.
Truthers don't need to come up with an exact theory of the crime to prove Muslims/Arabs didn't pull off 9-11. There shouldn't have been any unreacted thermitic material incorporating nanotechnology in the WTC dust. And WTC7 shouldn't have been able to fall with the acceleration of gravity for 2.25 secs.
Case closed.
IWETF 2 years ago 71
I wonder how long those among us that have never taken a second look at 9/11 can keep their heads in the sand? I guess that depends on when the 'majority' takes up the issue.
Hopefully the tipping point will come sooner than later.
teleomorph 2 years ago
I also question what on earth the truth movement really expects to happen.
If you believe that guys painted thermite instead of upgrading the insulation, then you'd have to track down and interrogate all those workers.
What then? If you get nothing from it, if you develop no leads, where are you going to stop?
If you're not careful this will turn into an endless witch hunt, where failure is perceived as more coverup instead of NO EVIDENCE.
Be careful what you wish for.
alienentity 2 years ago
JREFers are a laughing stock, just ignore them. They are just too cowardly to face the truth that 9/11 was indeed an inside job. Many JREFers are just shills paid to spread disinformation and the others are idiot followers. Always remember where they stood on 9/11 and how they tried to cover-up the truth. They are traitors to America. JREFers are SCUM.
centrino105 2 years ago
Now you're just demonizing people who disagree with you.
American patriots can have different opinions, y'know.
Get over it.
alienentity 2 years ago
How solid are the samples? I mean. can they proof it's really 9/11 dust? They are probably going to try to discredit this...
WTFaboutWTC7 2 years ago
read the additional info check out the bentham thing
birserk 2 years ago
In conclusion, this material, whatever label you give it - 'nanothermite' 'paint' 'red chips' etc.. simply doesn't have the energy density, applied as thinly as it was (like a primer paint) to do anything to steel.
Jones appears to be debunking his own theory, although he doesn't seem to realize it yet.
alienentity 2 years ago
Read the paper. The smaller the refinement of the aluminum and oxide powder, the greater the energy. Remember the Anthrax terrorist story in 2001? That particular Anthrax was more potent because it was smaller and more refined. It is estimated that 10 tons of nanothermite ("red chips"/ "super-thermite") was in the buildings.
ThisWeekInFascism 2 years ago
According to the Navys Small Business Innovation Research, super-thermite "is restricted under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), which controls the export and import of defense-related material and services.
ThisWeekInFascism 2 years ago
A DOD report from 2002: Nanoenergetics: An Emerging Technology Area of National Importance
"At this point in time, all of the military services and some DOE and academic laboratories have active R&D programs aimed at exploiting the unique properties of nano- materials that have potential to be used in energetic formulations for advanced explo- sives...nanoenergetics hold promise as useful ingredients for the thermobaric (TBX) and TBX-like weapons..."
ThisWeekInFascism 2 years ago
ThisWeek - the chemical energy is the same, no matter what size the particles are. The difference is in the speed of the reaction.
The reason thermite is significant is because it has a high temperature when it burns.
This is just basic reality, whether you believe the government, or not.
Nothing wrong with being a skeptic is there?
thx for allowing comments btw.
cheers
alienentity 2 years ago
Exactly wrong.
ThisWeekInFascism 2 years ago
Fine, so what's the energy difference between regular and nanothermite then? It's pretty similar.
What is it?
alienentity 2 years ago
page 25
Any further questions, ask in mail.
ThisWeekInFascism 2 years ago
I don't get it. I wrote 'ThisWeek - the chemical energy is the same, no matter what size the particles are. The difference is in the speed of the reaction.'
You respond 'exactly wrong'. Yet that's exactly what the paper says - it's the rate of release that is different.
Why can't you guys just accept a fact? I don't understand this.
I thought this was about looking for the truth, not scapegoats and myths.
alienentity 2 years ago
I've read through your comments & agree that Dr. Jones needs to allow others to review the report. Since you seem to have a genuine interest in the truth, I would be interested on your take on how the ground temps. at all three sites maintained such high temps for two months after the collapses. I have a college degree and plenty of chemistry and physics & I've never heard a valid explanation. Watch this video I compiled, and tell whe how this happens from office fires:
watch?v=IWvUFd8XnMs
CyberCilypudi 2 years ago
I looked into this quite extensively, discovered that hot underground fires can happen, for example in coal.
Here you have a low oxygen, petrochemical based smouldering fire which grows very hot because the heat cannot escape.
A debris pile would potentially become thermal insulation and allow temps to climb. Given adequate oxygen and fuel, that is.
Thermite burns too quickly to be a longterm fuel source. Esp. nanothermite, which is explosive.
alienentity 2 years ago
@alienentity -- Well actually, a debris pile comprised of ordinary materials found in an office-tower lacks sufficiently dense, highly-reactive fuels capable of achieving & radiating the enormous thermal temps recorded. Rivers & pools of semi-molten steel from superthermite reactions are energetic enough to cause depolymerization, breaking of molecular bonds within debris, freeing organic volatiles and oxygen to drive further combustion (violent oxidation).
starmanskye 1 year ago
Great work!!
hansjalv 2 years ago 2
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
dailypaul. com/node/88685
It's finallly over. I has been proved. 9/11, indeed, was demolition. Now, who did it? This material is traceable and the number one connection is the military. Did you know that 2.5 trillion dollars went missing from the military shortly before 9/11?
Gilgamesh73 2 years ago
'It's finallly over. I has been proved' I think that statement is very premature.
There are several fundamental problems with the grey/red chips.
1) Jones et al did not compare these to a sample of WTC primer paint to eliminate that paint as the source.
2) Original primer paint contains several elements that Jones found on the chips but assumed were contaminants: calcium, sulfur, zinc, chromium and potassium.
Zinc and Chromium in particular are in primer paint, along with all the things in chips
alienentity 2 years ago
continued:
Sorry, in the ORIGINAL specs for primer, not necessarily current paints. this is an important distinction.
3) The energy release of Jones' red chips varies considerably, even EXCEEDING thermite. This means that it contains more energy density, so it probably isn't thermite at all.
(since explosives carry their own oxidants, the total energy density is lower than say, paint or paper by a considerable margin)
4) In 2007 Jones stated that the chips were in 100% of their samples.
alienentity 2 years ago
4) In 2007 Jones stated that the chips were in 100% of their samples. The statistcal chances of this happening are near zero, so this indicates that either the samples were tampered with, or that the material from which the chips came was almost universally applied to WTC towers.
That points to primer paint, which contains all the elements found in Jones' red chips, including Zinc and Chromium.
alienentity 2 years ago
5) This finding has NOT been corroborated by any other independent group of scientists, nor has it had a chance to be criticized properly.
Jones is getting WAY ahead of the science and is engaging in a PR campaign to sell this idea. I think it's likely this will backfire eventually.
ps, several physicists have looked at the molecular energy potential of this material and concluded that it could only raise the temp of steel beams by perhaps 10 to 25 Degrees Kelvin. Very slightly...
alienentity 2 years ago
You JREFfers are protesting way to much, and howling at the moon, as if the moon is listening to anything you're saying anymore. Your echo chamber is stupefying you.
Stop kicking, obfuscating, rationalizing and screaming, write a rebuttal, publish it in Bentham, and only then will we listen to anything you dumbunkers have to say.
I can't wait to read your peer reviewed rebuttal. It will be easy to disprove this latest finding, no? Bentham peer review process is non existent, no? Ready? Go!
grozlz 2 years ago
groziz - so do you think that a 20 micron thick coating of a material which has less energy density than paper can destroy a steel building?
Yes or no? Don't obfuscate.
alienentity 2 years ago
What does it matter what i think?.
You and your JREF zerglings think you have dumbunked Jones, and that Bentham is a rag?
Your next steps are simple: Write up a rebuttal, and publish your peer reviewed destruction of Jones latest paper there.
After all, Bentham is a shitty hack journal where anyone can publish anything, et cetera et cetera ad infinitum, right?
Ready, set, go!
grozlz 2 years ago 2
Also, they found 'calcium, sulfur, zinc, chromium and potassium.' It's in the paper.
Thermite cannot account for this. But paint can. (no pun intended).
alienentity 2 years ago
nnNo let's just focus on 9/11 and don't get stupid statements about IDS and other loony distractions take over the conversation of my beloved WTC and a friend from grammar school, FDNY, vaporized. Are there still >900 people undiscovered in the dust?
Best to all of you.
-- Tom NYC
tombqnyc 2 years ago
NIST has experts in nano-thermates and they couldn't address this?
JSSTyger 2 years ago
This is a significant discovery.
The real perps just started sweating a bit.
rotobeam 2 years ago 6
I'm a big fan of TV Fakery ... I don't buy the thermite story ... explosives quite likely also direct energy weapons like likely as well.
Thanks for posting.
TodMcInerney 2 years ago
DEW
ladyewoyn 2 years ago
..and then some.
donkey69donkey69 2 years ago 2
Reportedly, the Pentagon has given the world al Qaeda, Anthrax, the Ayatollahs and AIDS.
nopember 2 years ago
yes ... they are so thoughtful with their gifts
TodMcInerney 2 years ago