Added: 1 year ago
From: TheTheBluemchen
Views: 80,139
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (196)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These individuals do exists!

  • One way, or another, you have to respect the indomitable will of the Germans.The Holy Roman Empire, The German Empire, World war I, The Nazi party, and World War II. They're entire history is made up of powerful empires over the course of time. Each time they're empires fell they're country was nothing but ash, yet each time they rose, they rose up stronger. I mean god damn the German's are one strong people.

  • i wonder what the average german KD is.

  • если в кране нет воды...

  • This is what happens when you follow Satan. Why Germans? Why?

  • if Hitler striven for world peace, he would of changed the world...I do not respect him for what he did, but respect him for who he was

  • same here. i know what you mean. he was a gifted convincer. but he used his gift for evil.

  • @DCUnderdog3000 he was not evil, he stood for principle

  • Deutschland ist uber alles

  • @Occiden89 ja, uber alles.. halt die fresse

  • scheiss werbung

  • Wait...how come Berlin is still German??

  • @lerbagge a country is usually given back to its original owners after it is defeated

  • And the war over religion continue...arrgh...

    Message of religion is good whats not is you little piece of shit making war over it.

  • LOL i am....well then i guess most people 99% are with me, and your with the losers! Get lost, and go help your muzzie friends burn some library!

  • @GermanWarrior22 Hahaha my friend, look where we are today because of dumb people that are with you, why would i be like them and you

  • @QCBEC err...yeah....nice comeback! Keep reaching for your dreams, and remind your mother to give your thorazine drip!

  • @GermanWarrior22 haha you're a funny person.

  • @GermanWarrior22 haha you're a funny person.

  • what happened to the gestapo?

  • gobbels go burn in hell for life and eternity.

  • muffins :D

  • Nazi isnt that bad.this is the propaganda of the film shows nazi are bad

  • @FarkhaNKnighT If they aren't bad, they are pretty damn stupid. I'll tell you that.

  • @Scorpiocracy That i agree a little.

  • @FarkhaNKnighT Ahaha well old Addy's two choices of stupidity: 1- targeting a race and others for a problem they didn't start. 2- fighting a two-front war. But it's 'cause of them that I love WWII. This stands out a lot.

  • @Scorpiocracy The jews are vermin to the german people.See israel now.but i agree that 2 front are they stupidity.if i were hitler i would wipe out the brits and the US first.then go for the communist !

  • @FarkhaNKnighT The Nazis were the vermin to the German people! Hitler swayed the people into war for idiotic reasons, took advantage of them, sacrificed them for a dumb ass belief, and when they were losing the war he gave up on them and said they deserved death and that Germans were the inferior ones.

    HOW IRONIC!!

  • @FarkhaNKnighT Muslims are the inferior of all races. Germans today would honor the strand of any German hair over yours. You hate Jews because they are doing to you what any decent human with brains do, and mark my words Germans today are making life hell allready with muslims. I doubt Germans would make a propoganda film about themselves. Accept the truth, and be decent. You muslims just have so much hate. And your way behind in life. You have contributed nadda to this world!

  • @GermanWarrior22 muslim have so much hates?do you know the reason why?

  • @GermanWarrior22 muslims aren't a race.

  • @GermanWarrior22 "You have contributed nadda to this world".

    Well, seeing as you think Muslims are a race, I'm guessing you would include every ethnicity with a muslim majority as a part of this race.

    Iranians, Sumerians, Semites (Akkadian, Babylonian), Egyptians have not contributed to this world?

  • @AryanMithra Iranians, Sumerians, Semites (Akkadian, Babylonian), Egyptians have not contributed to this world? All those you mention are present day alive...Assyrians are non muslims have no relation to arabs, and speak Aramaic a language which is similar to Hebrew! Wow! I know more then you.....Iranains present day read write in Arabic what does that tell you! Anyways, there is an expression which says..."Dont look at what you were then...look at what you are now"

  • @GermanWarrior22 They have, and that's why I left a "?" at the end of the sentence.

    Sumerians are spread all over Iranic/Mesopotamian (Mesopotamian as in northern "arabs") populations, same thing goes for most of the other ancient civilizations such at the hettites and mittanis.

    Kurds write Kurdish, and most do it in the latin alphabet. So what's your point? Assyrians are Semites just like Arabs. Aramaic is not similar to Hebrew, LOL. What is this shit?

  • @AryanMithra Aramaic you dumb ass is the root language of Hebrew the language of Jesus! You sure dont know shit about what is going on in the east. The German city of trier was invaded by Assyrians and it still has a plaque on it which reads the assyrians were here before the Romans. And no according to DNA and genology finds Assyrians have no relation to Assyrians. Stop bull fucking shitting! Stupidity comes from your parents trying to make themselves feel good. Then passing it on!

  • @batts2008 I have heard about Trier.I also believe the ancient countries were in europe.The king Tribeca invaded that region of Germany are you assyrian?

  • @batts2008 Didn't say they were related, did I?

    That German guy was acting as if Aramaic and Hebrew were like two dialects of the same language. No fucking way. They're very different.

    You're claiming that Assyrians invaded West-Germany and I am the one bullshitting? What the fuck? Also Trier didn't exist at the time the Assyrians were the bosses in the Middle East. Maybe Assyrians built a porta that transferred them directly to West Germany from Mesopotamia?

  • LMAAAOOOO no wait...LMFAOOOOOOO...wow talk about stupid. it is no wonder you would not know what Aramaic is...jack ass...lolllll I did not need to say a wordyou just got told off!!!!!

  • @GermanWarrior22

    Stop acting like a nigger, you dumbass.

    Writing "LMFAO" and "lolll" doesn't make you sound cool, nor intelligent.

  • @AryanMithra Ok nice little analogy thank you for stopping by, and why the racist rwem man?

  • @GermanWarrior22 Iranians were forced to convert, but still many managed to keep their old identity.

    Examples are the Yezidis, Alevis, Yarsan and the Parsians.

    Brave boy, keep on fighting on the internet while your country is getting destroyed.

    You deserve it.

    FYI, I'm not in Germany, nor am I in Europe or the West.

  • @AryanMithra When you change a language you are arabized, and it usually comes from inter-marriage. I agree you have traditions, but try gaining more back. Iranians are actually smart people. Please stop comparing assyrians to arabs they have no relation. You dont seem to like it when people say you are related to them. Assyrians have ALL traditions not just language. Aramaic was used in the Passion of Christ! How come being from the middle east you dont know this brotha?

  • @batts2008 Wait what? So if the Mongolian language evolves, and it changes, it's arabized? Or do you mean that the language changed because of Arabs?

    Arabs and Assyrians are related. They are both Semites, and all Christian Arabs in Iraq/Syria/Turkey try to say they're Assyrians. The problem here is that they're accepted by Assyrians.

    Even though Talysh people and Punjabis don't really interract with eachother, they're still related.

  • @AryanMitha why try convince someone that they are related. 75% of Assyrians have mixed ancestory, and Semetism was actually just a group of languages that Hitler took, and used and twisted as a race. In America both Jews, and Arabs are regarded white. In fact in most countries. look at the DNA map made for human races Arabs are not close in ancestory to the Assyrians who were known as Sumerians, Akkadians, babylonians and many names they were one people and if they are related

  • this whole Goddam world is related because the tower of babel was made by the Assyrians who were called babylonians at the time. Thats how languages came about. Noah had sons, and the rest goes on, and on. Oh, and back about the chart it actually has which races are closest in gentic possibility not by languages, but blood. Its interesting.

  • @GermanWarrior22 75% of Assyrians have mixed ancestry, okay.

    Now how the fuck could they be Assyrians then?

    As far as genetics go, 30% of Kurds in Turkey have the l2 Y-DNA according to the newest genetic tests. Let's say the rest of the 70% are mixed. Does that mean Kurds are Croatians now? Nope, I don't think s.

    Semites are Arabs, Jews and Akaddians (and their descendants).

    It's not that hard to understand.

    It's not a term made by Hitler.

  • @GermanWarrior22 But that's wrong.

    Assyrians are known as Assyrians.

    Chaldeans are known as Babylonians.

    And Sumerians? No one knows, nor does anyone give a fuck.

    But then BANG, if we check Y-DNA in Iraq, 25% of Iraqi "Arabs" seem to be descendants of people that lived there hundreds, if not, thousands of years before the Arabic invasion!

    FYI, the J2 found among Iranians (Kurds, Azeris, Persians, Balochs, EVEN Ossetians) is way older than the J2 found among these Assyrians.

  • My country is a leading super power economy....where on earth do you get your info. Germans are abusing muslims, and the dumb mongloids dont even know whats happening.

  • @GermanWarrior22 Except muslims have contributed majorly to architecture, optics, astronomy, philosophy, mechanics, chemistry and that at such a fundamental level there is no way your/our "precious western civilization" would be anywhere recognizable without them.

  • @lektrum I love the joke! Contributions? Most great inventions come from either Jews, and Germans. How Ironic, and learn history better. Assyrians and there decendants today are all Christian. You would know that if you werent so stupid....now go burn your library. Thats what you muslims do best destroy! LMAO! Nice job in egypt. Destroying your supposed history? And dont get too excited Iraqis today are arab garbage. DNA has allready proven! You have no relation to ancient mesopotamia!

  • Today Assyrians still are all alive, speak an Akkadian language, and Yes I agree present day Iranians are also arab garbage since they read, and write in arabic. Tsk tsk....learn whats going on then open your mouth you mullah! Go shave your beard, and leave Germany your not worthy to be in this great thriving country! Once again everything German is great, and dont you dare compare yourself to ancient nations you have killed off most! History books are great! but you probably

  • burn those to! And idiot I never said your a race Islam belongs to Arabs was spread by arabs like a disease to MOST people who are ARABIZED! If you understood what Pan-Arabizm is you would know how well you monkeys try to hijack history, and destroy even Lebanese Maronites dont call themselves Arabs although they speak arabic. So you see Dumb ass I know Turkish mogloids are a race, but being you muslims act like a race you should be categorized! Now go burn a library! Yay!

  • *mongloids!

  • @GermanWarrior22

    German inventions are based on Jewish ones, who are based on early Mesopotamian ones.

    Your point?

  • That I agree because there is proof that Mesopotamians were in ancient germany along with the romans. Hitler himself has reffered to himself as a decendant of Sumerians, and other ancient great civilizations. Smartest thing you posted all day....

  • @GermanWarrior22 Yeah, GERMANS BE MESOPOTAMIANS NOW! HUEHUEHUE.

    Germans are abusing Muslims? Then how come you're complaining about Muslims? Since you seem to have such a good controll on them, there shouldn't be any problem, right?

  • @GermanWarrior22 "GermanWarrior", your username tells a lot about you. I'm not muslim. I'm Norwegian, and as such, according to your view of genetics, I am by far your superiour. Bow before me, you pathetic excuse for a human. You too, is an untermensch in your own eyes.

  • @lektrum Norwegian? Ok and lets shell out some great facts about your superiority? You havent been heard on the news, and be even talked about since that little bombing incident. Real contribution. And I dont recall anyone really calling you a Great race. I never said I liked Hitler. I believed he was a liar, and thug himself with a great Charlie Chaplin moustache. My anger stems from Muslims admiring such a man. Weather you are muslim or not means nothing, and I am proud my country is

  • a responsible one and I have no problem loving, and defending it. I dont believe they were an evil people. When I get messages from muslims its usually how grateful they were for Hitler, and my point and message is the fact many Germans HATE Hitler who was not even German but Austrian. My response would have been for these muslims who keep wanting to glorify his doings but dont understand the guilt and hatred many Germans feel about what happened. They still believe Germans

  • hate Jews, but in reality they are the ones who are causing more problems in europe then Jews. Jews actually had been intergrated in German society you would never know someone was a Jew unless they told you, or they happened to be Orthodox, or dressed up like one, and even they were well in society. Muslims on the other hand stand out, and dont want to become part of a culture and that hatred stemmed from no one lying to them but by experiencing them.

  • @GermanWarrior22 Contribution? So what has Germany done that's been so great since... The 19th century? Oh that's right, it wasn't Germany then either was it, but a conglomeration of petty kingdoms..

    How does defending what you believe to be German have anything to do with your ill-educated animosty with muslims? By using that word, and by generalizing there is no difference between people from Marocco to Indonesia, undermines any argument you could will yourself to postulate.

  • @GermanWarrior22 Now now, GermanKeyboardWarrior, it's a well known fact that Hitler adored the Norwegians and Scandinavians in general.

    Don't forget that they were ravaging through Europe (even North America and the Middle East too) without you being able to do shit about it.

  • No where in history does it say anything. All you have done is steal majority of what is allready been there, but people still dont believe it is yours. The only thing muslims are good at is poetry.

  • "They gave us a mandate and now they are paying for it."

    Mandated? Only 40% of the German population voted for the Nazis, the Nazis got into power by force so this "they are paying for it," crap statement is totally idiotic.

  • THE DOCTOR AND HIS ASSISTANT WERE VERY POWERFUL ACTORS IN THS CLIP. DOES ANYBODY KNOW THEIR NAMES AND THE CHARACTERS THEY PORTRAYED. THANK YOU

    DER ARZT UND SEIN HELFER WAREN SEHR STARKE SCHAUSPIELER in der THS-BÜROKLAMMER. TUT IRGENDJEMAND WEIß IHRE NAMEN UND DIE CHARAKTERE, DIE SIE PORTRÄTIERTEN. DANKE

    FORGIVE MY POOR GERMAN

  • @themanfromwem

    you'll get the answer at the end of the movie...

  • i feel poor for the germany people who weren't nazis. they get threated like the nazis threated the others. kind of payback but some of the germands weren't nazi :L

  • Die Verräter an Deutschland werden für dieses Verbrechen eines Tages büßen!!!

  • Ob es damals wirklich noch so straff organisiert und protokollarisch zugegangen ist??

  • Eva is crazy. First she allowed a party under Soviet artillery, then she made herself stay in the battle of Berlin. And now she's walking in a field that might be full of danger?

  • @ndcpro1998 YEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAH crazy bitch

  • @hellasracism ....You should push the On button in your brain.....

  • @hellasracism Klappe halten, du zweckdementer Honk!

  • beautiful nurse, 7:18

  • Yes, they had heroin and morphine and methadone, which was invented during that time.

  • the part when that guy arm got cut off did they used prevent pain drugs like today?

  • warum sollte deutschland untergehen ? lieber russland und türkei

  • When the Russians marched on Berlin, why didn't the Nazi's ask their allies Italy and Japan to help them? Then the Germans could have helped them with their wars as a return favor, kind of like ''You scratch my back, I scratch yours.'' sort of thing.

  • @TheVodkaChugger I believe by this time Italy had already fallen. Japanese Navy was destroyed and many japanese troops were isolated in various parts of Asia. Japan had to defend their own territories and to provoke the Russians at this time would be unwise. Collusion now was much too late

  • @TheVodkaChugger are you serious? if you are, at that moment Italy was nearly conquerde by the Allies and Japan was in difficulties itself, so they could not have helped, even if they wanted. Japan didn't help Germany to fight against the Soviet Union and Italy was since the beginning of the war a completely useless ally. In fact these allys were not very helpful at all and this alliance caused more problems than Germany would have had on it's own.

  • @ReconquistaGermany Well I'm sorry that I don't study WWII!

  • @TheVodkaChugger It was a naive question, but I don't blame you for that. I'm glad I could help. Well, at this point of the war, there was no more chance to win for Germany (I am German!), unless we would have took the right steps like mass-production of Messerschmidt Me-262 etc. in 1944.

  • @ReconquistaGermany Hitler's biggest mistake by far in my opinion was attacking Russia. With Russia on the allies side now their army outnumbered Hitler's by FAR. If Hitler never attacked Russia at least he wouldn't have TWO fronts to deal with. With America and Britain closing in from the west and Russia from the east it was a certain defeat.

  • @YoMama844 Yes, of course! But there are a lot of other not so obvious mistakes.

  • @ReconquistaGermany LIke what? I can't think of any other ones. I know that he was too greedy and wanted WORLD DOMINATION which would never happen.

  • @YoMama844 we let the british evacuate their troops (330.000) from dünkirchen - we stoped attacking airports, hangars and radar-stations in the battle of britain - we didn't conquer malta - we did not send more troops to africa to beat the british troops and reach the middle-east - the alliance with Italy ( this caused only contra-productive effects) - concentrating on the south in russia (1942) and not conquering Moskau/Leningrad -

  • @YoMama844 we wasted the good troops in stalingrad and stationed the weak ones on the flankes - so the good troops could be sorrounded - hitler assumed the command of the wehrmacht (completely fail - the generals would have made better decisions) - the potential of war production was maximized too late - advanced weapons were produced too late or not enough of it -> bad sharing of ressources

    ... and a lot more ... but I think these are the critical fails

  • @ReconquistaGermany i love how you say "we" like you actually were there. you're just a neo nazi faggot and probably hates jews for the lack of his dick size.

  • @BmXPAINTBALLER94 grow up, kid.

  • @BmXPAINTBALLER94 : cocksucker, I hate jews for all the shit they've pulled for thousands of years. Fucking moneygrubbers. Death to all jews.

  • the actress who played traudl is super cute :) the real traudl was kind fugly...

  • Es ist einfach nur traurig, dass so viele Deutsche, die eigentlich eine stärkere Wirtschaft wollten, so sinnlos abgeschlachtet worden sind. Fast alle waren so dumm und haben Hitlers Hassreden geglaubt. Ich verachte Hitler für seine feigen Verbrechen an Schwächeren ( besonders an jüdischen Männern, Frauen und Kindern).Aber ich schäme mich nicht ein Deutscher zu sein, denn ich kann gar nichts für Hitlers Taten und bin stolz auf das demokratische moderne Deutschland!

  • der untertitel könnte besser sein trotzdem nice ^^

  • Why do Germans always need to lose a war to understand they were wrong?...

  • @Heightofhate They lost one and two.. and those werent germans.. those were Nazi Germans

  • @Julian24151 Not all Germans by far were members of the NSDAP and therefore were "nazis".

    Germany lost the First World War and was wrong to start it together with Austrians and the nazis didn't even exist in those times.

    In WW2 those were almost all German men who fought on all fronts while the other part of the nation was working in the factories producing weapons for them.

    Germans looted whole Europe and used what they had stolen for their own profit.

    Those were all of Germans.

  • @Heightofhate Well the "germans" - the guys who lived in germany were different than Nazi Germans... i can gurantee 2/3 of the Nazi Army ... (soldiers) (pilots).. were average men who were FORCED to fight as Nazi's , to them all they were doing was serving their country.

  • @Julian24151 How were they "focred"? Could you give me any examples of those "forcing"?

    BTW, if someone dislike Hitler's government, why didn't they organize a guerilla fighting? Why wasn't there a single partisan attack against the police or the army in the Third Reich - an attack by its own citizens like in Mussolini's Italy? Why was there no war like in Spain, between fascists and normal people?

    Until 1942-43, Germans trusted and supported their government - and fought till the very end

  • @Heightofhate Nobody questions themselves when things are going well - I guess that is human nature - its an interesting issue - how do you fight a war as expansive as the Germans and accept defeat? Do you regret the war itself or the way in which it was prosecuted? I would have to be in their shoes to get any realistic insight into how it must feel to face the military defeat of your country.

  • @coveneyr There is such thing as "common sense" and "morality".

    Everyone must know the expression "what goes around comes around".

    If you bomb England expect it bomb you back. If you rape Russian women expect yours being raped, too.

    Don't hurt others - they won't hurt you.

    Germans were and, in fact, are very arrogant and live with the idea they "know what the right order is" and "how everything must be".

    That brought them too far.

    They regret the defeat - not the war.

  • @Heightofhate not all of them

  • @ShadowFyr3IX01 Nothing is 100%. But over a half of them do. And that's enough for a nation.

  • @Heightofhate some do regret it you know

  • @ShadowFyr3IX01 Some do regret, I know.

    I lived there for 8 years, I can judge.

  • @Heightofhate

    So you are saying that if Hitler just died, WW2 would still happen the same way?

    Russia already committed far worse war crimes before the holocaust even began.

    If you think the world should be in peace, stop blaming a whole countrys people for the actions of a few, that was more than 60 years ago, I could come up hundreds of things wrong with many countries right now but theres no need to say it all out infront of people who may be from these countries, look on the bright side

  • @jimmyxx3 There was no Russia before Holocaust, there was the USSR - a horrible, absolutely anti-Russian country which, nevertheless, slaughtered to 90% its own people inside its own territories. So it was its own problem.

    The history knows no "if". There was Hitler and the German nation followed him and no armed resistence had ever been detected in the Third Reich.

    Funny to see like you call Wehrmacht "a few people" - these bastards bombed,shelled,gunned,burned,l­ooted - millions of them.

  • @Heightofhate

    Uh, hello? That was called the "SS", and that is a different branch to the Wehrmacht.

    Russian people also followed Stalin, back then Germans followed Hitler, Russians followed Stalin, both sides had people who also disagreed with their own government, what could they do?

    There are still Russian Stalinists today who support communism and wish for the USSR to return.

    Of course they bombed, shelled, gunned, burned, and they weren't the only to loot, it's called "war".

  • @jimmyxx3 Uh, hell? SS was NOT a branch of Wehrmacht.

    Luftwaffe was NOT SS - do you want to say they didn't bomb hundreds of peaceful cities, towns and villages? They did.

    Wehrmacht used hundreds of thousands of canons - they shelled those cities, towns and villages as well.

    Wehrmacht attacked independent countries, invaded their territories destroying every resistence in its way and killing millions of people.

    SS worked in concentration camps and conducted antiguerilla tactics

    Wehrmacht=crime

  • @jimmyxx3 One of the biggest articles about the WW2 in German language at Wikipedia is "Verbrechen der Wehrmacht", but if you don't speak German, go its English equivalent "Crimes of the Wehrmacht" - this article is smaller but provides enough info to see that Wehrmacht was AS criminal as SS. You will also find very interesting pictures there.

    But if Wiki isn't everything - go google a bit on Wehrmacht's crimes, you'll find horrible things.

    Germans were not the only to loot - but they started.

  • @jimmyxx3 ... and with bombing, shelling, gunning, bruning, raping etc. those were also Germans who started first - a very important thing.

    Let alone the obvious fact that the Wehrmacht were paving the way for the SS who followed them and brought annihilation anywhere they went.

    In Russia there are not only stalinists but also nazis, although Hitler and Germans committed hell a lot of crimes against Russians. So what? You have nazis and stalinists in France, Britain, Japan, USA. Sick people...

  • @jimmyxx3 But if these sick people make 1% of the nation it's not so bad. If it's 99% - it's a different thing.

    Stalin, as all bolsheviks, took power by force, by a military coup and a later Russian Civil War which lasted 4 years and literally annihilated Russia

    There was a huge farmers uprise "Aleksyevshina" in 1925, Collectivisation and Golodomor in early 30s etc

    Hitler took power via legal elections

    Millions of Russians supported Germans when they invaded. But no Germans supported Russians

  • @Heightofhate

    Yes, but these neo-nazis are pathetic and don't even do it right, I bet you they don't even know when Hitler died or how long the war was.

    And to say the Wehrmacht was as criminal as the SS is just crazy! Don't forget how many civilians the Allies killed during and after, are they known today as criminals? And please, you seriously don't need to make 4 replies after just 1. (And I didn't say the SS was a branch of the Wehrmacht).

  • @jimmyxx3 Neo-nazis are pathetic? And the old nazis weren't pathetic? To me, they are all pathetic.

    The same is with stalinists - all pathetic. Often just a small bunch of 70 yo losers or psychopaths. Usually - simply paid or given food to demonstrate by the Communist Party of the RF.

    Allies killed a lot of civilians - but what does it have to do with the Wehrmacht's crimes? Still, Allies killed German civilians IN RESPONSE to the killing by Wehrmacht.

    Wehrmacht killed more people than SS.

  • @Heightofhate

    The original Nazis weren't pathetic that's for sure, they didn't run around on streets with arms stuck in the air wearing a T-shirt with a large swastika and everyone has bold heads, maybe something else would describe them better, both are very different.

    And no, the Wehrmacht committed much smaller war crimes than the SS, how could you say the Wehrmacht, which was mostly only used for fighting, commited more crimes than the SS!?

  • @jimmyxx3 No, the original nazis were running around on the streets dressed in brown, throwing stones at Jewish shops, beating those who were against them, wearing flags with swatistika etc.

    To me it's as pathetic as their today's behavior, although it looked a bit different.

    Wehrmachts "was mostly only used for fighting" - isn't it a crime? To me, it's the crime # 1, this "only fighting".

    Wehrmacht killed more people than SS. Thus, it's more criminal.

    Killing people is a crime. Isn't it?

  • @Heightofhate

    Well, yes the SA were idiots, I meant the more higher Nazi party members, although even the SA probably aren't as pathetic as todays neo-nazis, and by wearing swastikas, I means a red t-shirt with a large swastika on their bellies, which look pathetic.

    Killed more people? Well, they had to kill the enemy, shooting the enemy could even mean saving their own lives, it's war, that's basicly what they have to do if they're in a war.

  • @jimmyxx3 Today's neo-nazis' bosses are not running with bald heads along the streets as well, beleive me - they're old, well-dressed, fat and calm. Well looking gentlemen.

    I see no difference between a swastika on a banner and a swastika on a T-shirt - it's all the same, it's a demonstration of this symbol.

    SA were not less pathetic.

    "Wehrmacht had to kill the enemy" - sounds like "I had to kill the cops to save my own life". Ugly Crime!

    But how did those enemies become enemies?...

  • @Heightofhate

    It's a war, even the Americans (by which they deem themselves "good guys") shoot their eneies aswell, all countries did it, I mean it maybe horrid and even infact horrid doing so, but that is what soldiers are supposed to do in a battle!

    And I doubt that sounds the same, killing the cops is different, they are first trying to capture the suspect and bring them to prison, and opposing soldiers are trying to kill you

    Sorry, I never really heard of well dressed neo-nazis.

  • @jimmyxx3 Didn't you see my question? How did the enemies of Germans become their enemies?

    The answer is: enemy nations of Germany became its enemy nations when Germany attacked them.

    Germany created enemies for itself and bears all the guilt for it.

    Nobody attacked Germany in 1939, 1940, 1941 - but Germany attacked everyone.

    Then - the goal. The Poles', Russians' etc.NOBLE goal for fighting Germans was to free their lands.

    What was the goal of fighting for Germans in 1939, 1940 and 1941?

  • @Heightofhate: I am not so sure. The war with Poland might very well have been avoided if Poland had agreed on Hitler's modest suggestion to have an exterritorial train and car connection to East Prussia and Danzig. Poland Was shutting the acces roads and there was massive violence against ethnic Germans, reportedly tens of thousands fled across the border to Germany, many were shot when trying. Poland was backed by Britain and France not to negotiate. They expected war, victory and annexations.

  • @FlashmanForever There is no doubt that the whole WW2 was organised by the UK and France was also indirectly forced into the war and into the British political games leading the whole continental Europe to a massive slaughter, although at the cost of some British casualties, which were minimal compared to those of the others.

    Such violence against ethnic Germans started only after the German attack on Poland.

    Germany should have annexed some Western Polish territories, not go to Warsaw.

  • @jimmyxx3 If you want to see a well-dressed neo-nazi, then go to google - images - type "Udo Voigt".

    You'll see a fat, well-dressed, grey-haired guy with a tie on his neck.

    He is the leader of the neo-nazi party Germany's - NPD.

    My comparison with cops wasn't wrong at all - Germany acted as criminal, the nations attacked by Germany - like cops, trying to stop, capture, put on trial or just kill the murderer.

    Absolutely the same.

    I see no justification of the USA actions. They are criminal.

  • @Heightofhate I understand that yes and in reality violence breeds violence - someone once said that to secure peace one has to prepare for war - whether that is realpolitik or empty posturing to promote the military industrial complex I do not know. Common sense and morality do not always appear to play much part in war or peace in the minds of powerful individuals and groups.

  • @coveneyr But the society must be able to preserve its common sense and morality. If it loses them and starts eagerly annihilating other societies for fun or out of arrogance - then it loses the right to later complain about the consequences.

  • @Heightofhate You are quite correct to say that - the Nazi regime was disgusting. One thing that fascinates me and you can never know the consequences of altered history but I wonder this: Hitler would still have been a Dictator without the Second World War - he still would have caused untold misery (on a smaller scale if war had been averted) to the German people even if he had not displayed and expansionist or external military aggression I wonder how long he would have kept in power?

  • @coveneyr Misery? Under Hitler? What are you talking about?

    The misery was before Hitler - in the time right after the WW1. That was real misery!

    Hitler brought Germany jobs, money, he stopped honoring unfair and humiliating truce agreements signed in the end of the WW1 etc.

    Germany under Hitler became much more prosperous than it was before Hitler. And Hitler loved Germany with all his heart - and Germans were proud of him in the 30s as well, just watch the Olympics - do they look unhappy?

  • @Heightofhate Misery for some people surely? Hitler did indeed improve Germany's prestige and its economy - I do not say it was hell for everyone, but surely it was hell for some sections of society. Germans having pride in their country is understandable and in relation to the Olympics, the presentation of this prestigious event would not have been lost on Hitler. And ultimately WW2 was prosecuted under Hitler-surely that brought and wrought misery upon millions?

  • @coveneyr It was hell for some very, very, very small sections of the German sosciety. Maybe for 1%. There were only about 200,000 Germans put into concentration camps all in all. Out of 70 million!

    Anyway, compared to the misery of the 20s, when 99% of the German society was not living but existing, poor, hungry and humiliated after a posh period before 1914, well, it was worse and Hitler incorporated this hysterical need for refenge and rebirth of the German nation which ended with a fall.

  • 7:21

  • War is, was and will always be wrong :/

  • 2:23 - 2:28 I was thinking of a bazooka hitting her head and exploding to bits!!!!No seriously i thought it.

  • Fuck that Gobble shit skull face cunt of hitler antichrist demoniac.

  • omg.

  • shit I don't want to be in the last few days of the Battle of Britain as a German soldier.

  • @briandefox no1 ever really wanted to be in the war as the germans when shit started to get real and they got thier asses handed to them :/

  • "it stopped lets go for a walk"

    bitch it ain't like rain!

  • Traudl's hot.

  • @drodonomo7 hell yeah :)

  • @drodonomo7 Or course! she's romanian! ;)

  • Ist echt nur wie ein schrecklicher Albtraum, man kann nur dankbar sein, dass man nicht in so einer Zeit gelebt hat!

  • @AshleyFan2211 und dankbar, dass die Amerikaner und nicht die Russen ganz Deutschland "befreit" haben.

  • looks like call of duty world at war

  • GIBT UND GAB SOCLHE UND SOLCHE WIE MAN SIEHT

  • Genial Movie

  • The actor playing Goebbels has the same 'face of a dead man' thing that Goebbels had.

  • Comment removed

  • diese abgefuckte werbung bei jedem part aufs neue und immer die selbe....youtube wird auch immer beschränkter

  • damn,you can't even smoke a cigare quietly because of them damn artilery strikes.The nerve of some people...

  • goebbels - 8:20 - 30 and @ 8:24, reminds of me politicians today. obviously theres a difference between Nazis being the cause of death of their own people and citizens today suffering at the hands of just bad governance.

  • I FUCKING HATE MCDONALDS 1955 BURGER AND THE FUCKING HARRY POTER AD SHIT!

  • No , Hitlers secretary is cute :D

  • Complete madness.

  • 6:15 - 7:29 - that's pretty much what do people get when voting on populist-speaking parties.

  • shit adverisment

  • lol why are the women so relaxed? xD

  • Damn propaganda minister "Skeletor" was cruel.

  • fegelein the antic master

  • the doctor reminds me of senator organa from star wars III, i dont know why.

  • 0 12 the master of all antics ( look in the right of burgdorf

  • the guy just shot those old men in the balls??? that's just wrong... you should never shoot a guy in the balls