You know what, there are a lot of cars that I think suck, including, but not limited to, the Ford Pinto, Kia Sephia, and Chevrolet (Daewoo) Aveo. But you know, I don't go to videos of them and post douchey comments. Why? Because I'm not a FUCKING ASSHOLE.
@bmwandcadillacftw Silly comment. Look at head to head competition between Audi and BMW...in particular before Quattro was banned for being an unfair advantage...Audi owned BMWs ass!
If you guys have ever attended a real racing technique class you would know that speed of shifts are not as relevant as energy transfer from suspension. A quick shift is worthless if the suspension has travel. Love Internet racers.
@scoobydawg04 Thats the stupidest thing i read in some time. Suspension travel has absolutely no effect on the acceleration, especially in a car with 4WD. Wheels on a car with soft suspension will turn the same as on a car with stiff suspension. Energy transfer from suspension? You have no clue what you're talking about.
"Love Internet racers." Yea... its too bad you're one of them.
@derbigpr500 By making this post, you make it very clear to me that you have never attended a driving school or ever had an instructor show you proper technique. Suspension has more to do with acceleration including dampers and ride height than the driver impacts straight line speed. Sign up for a 2 day skip barber class and you will see (as I did). You're probably granny shiftin, not double clutchin like ya should BRIAN SPILLNER!
some people just don't get this idea. And not only is your comment correct, but the kind of car and weight comes into play. So according to hydrake, an eighteen wheeler should be way faster due to the size of its engine??
@hydrake you have to consider the fact that the quattro make that the engine lost about 20% of the horsepower through the drivetrain so the v8 engine make 340bhp.. at wheel it would be about 272whp
obviously your an idiot and dont drive an Audi RaymondBarreto. Those shifts where way to smooth for a manual car. Its Automatic he was prolly using the tiptronic feature at the time.
@alexrex20 that is a completely false statement. It all depends on the car you have. Yes a Lamborghini with the dual clutch auto will shift faster than the manual, but in the b6 S4, no the auto is slower.
@cvinc17 you know nothing about cars, specifically transmissions if you think a human shifting a shift lever is faster than ANY automatic transmission. there's a reason why they're used in drag racing.
@alexrex20 the reason they are used in drag racing is because they are typically stronger and can handle the torque of the car, not because they shift fast. You obviously know less than nothing if you can even consider the possibility that automatics are all faster than manuals. You obviously have never driven any one model vehicle that had both transmission options. There is a reason that most autos are slower accelerating than their manual counterparts. Look it up, you might learn something.
@cvinc17 the reason that the automatic is slower than its manual counterpart is because the automatic will typically have less gears and thus taller gear ratios. try harder next time. when you finally have some facts to qualify your statements, get back to me.
@alexrex20 no that is not the case at all, you cant generalize transmissions with that statement. many new or recent cars have shorter geared 7 or even 8 speed automatics which are still slower than their 6 speed manual counterparts, a great example being the 2010 Audi S4. Don't believe me? look it up or ask around, you will be told the same thing i am telling you. So nope you're wrong again, and as for trying harder, i don't need to, you are making this easy for me with your lack of knowledge.
@cvinc17 with the 2010 S4, manufacturer claims and empirical date from 3rd parties show identical 0-60mph times with EITHER transmission. we can then deduce that the 7-speed automatic has 1 extra shift compared to the 6-speed manual, though it still achieves the same 0-60mph time.
you are still wrong. please try harder. like i said, please give me some FACTS to qualify your statements. check out dictionary-dot-com for the definition of "facts."
@alexrex20 no im not wrong, and anyone else that knows cars will tell you the same thing and will agree with me if you asked them. I am sorry you feel that you are correct in this debate. How about i give you another example the bmw 335xi, which i know for a fact is slower 0-60 in auto form and i know for a fact shifts slower than i can row through the gears of its manual counterpart, its called personal experience. No need to try harder like i said, i dont need to.
@alexrex20 also as far as i have reviewed, the 0-60 of the auto is .3 seconds slower from 3rd party reviews. and saying "we can then deduce" is like saying we can then "assume". As far as my example goes it was only intended to prove to you that the gears are shorter in some automatics then in manuals, but some still dont accelerate any faster. Again your overall claims that generalize automatics shifting faster than manuals is false. In some cases it may be true, but over all, it is false.
you'll forgive me when i say your "personal experience" doesn't mean shit. show me hard date - which you can't - and maybe i'll start taking you seriously. until then, keep talking out of your ass. keep offering up examples, only to be countered by me, so you can then say, "it was only intended to..."
@alexrex20 I fail? no the failure here is you and your inability to comprehend when you are wrong and have no clue what you are talking about. Back tracking? not even close. And the reason i offer examples is so you will learn the facts that you wanted so badly. There was none of your countering to them either, just your bias non-experienced opinion. You truly lack the common knowledge, experience, and maturity to be considered an automotive enthusiast. You probably don't even have a license.
Respond to this video... Just admit you are wrong and give up, it will save you the embarrassment from when other viewers review your comments and scoff with hilarity. You're making a fool out of yourself with your falsified, opinionated statements that hold no value.
@alexrex20 No actually, I am quite positive that you have not managed to even come close to proving any of my examples wrong. Still fishing? I have already won the derby.
@cvinc17 you said, "many new or recent cars have shorter geared 7 or even 8 speed automatics which are still slower than their 6 speed manual counterparts, a great example being the 2010 Audi S4."
sorry, you're wrong. Audi and third-party reviewers test the 2010 Audi S4 to achieve identical 0-60mph times with either the automatic or manual.
I'm pretty sure you're just jealous because you don't know how to drive stick, so you have made an entire case based around the fact that "autos are faster" so that you won't look as bad.
Also, you are right in that many automatics (not just the dual clutch stuff) do shift considerably faster than any driver can manually. However, the ACCELERATION of the car is usually slower because more power is lost through the fluid coupling of an automatic transmission than through the direct mechanical geartrain of a manual. True paddle shift setups such as Ferrari uses are actually manuals with electrohydraulic clutches, NOT automatics with torque converters.
@hw454 Interesting theory thats would be correct, if we were in 1980's. Todays automatic transmission with double clutch systems shift faster than any man could do, and do VERY smoothly, so you dont physicaly feel the shift at all, you just hear the sound of the engine changing. Take a ride in any new european car with double clutch gearbox and you'll see how much faster it is than manual. Example, VW Golf GTI with manual vs DGS gearbox. DSG = better acceleration, better fuel efficiency.
Shit ass drive, not in sport
HamishW96 2 months ago
Ive seen old people fuck faster than that
jdmderick 2 months ago
I think its spelled (acceleration) DUMB ASS!!!!
TheRhyno10 4 months ago
automatic as fuck.
cmanclan101 7 months ago
rs and s sucks
sincerely
///M power and V series
bmwandcadillacftw 7 months ago
@bmwandcadillacftw
You know what, there are a lot of cars that I think suck, including, but not limited to, the Ford Pinto, Kia Sephia, and Chevrolet (Daewoo) Aveo. But you know, I don't go to videos of them and post douchey comments. Why? Because I'm not a FUCKING ASSHOLE.
924Carrera 7 months ago
@924Carrera lol did i make u cry its called crash talk its not meant to crush your spirit hahaha
bmwandcadillacftw 7 months ago
@bmwandcadillacftw
I believe you mean "trash talk." I was just observing how much of a douchebag you were.
924Carrera 7 months ago
@924Carrera calm down its all in good fun
bmwandcadillacftw 7 months ago
@bmwandcadillacftw i agree the ms are better but the s4 r still great cars
6969razvan 6 months ago
@bmwandcadillacftw Silly comment. Look at head to head competition between Audi and BMW...in particular before Quattro was banned for being an unfair advantage...Audi owned BMWs ass!
drdavethedude 4 months ago
If you guys have ever attended a real racing technique class you would know that speed of shifts are not as relevant as energy transfer from suspension. A quick shift is worthless if the suspension has travel. Love Internet racers.
scoobydawg04 1 year ago
@scoobydawg04 Thats the stupidest thing i read in some time. Suspension travel has absolutely no effect on the acceleration, especially in a car with 4WD. Wheels on a car with soft suspension will turn the same as on a car with stiff suspension. Energy transfer from suspension? You have no clue what you're talking about.
"Love Internet racers." Yea... its too bad you're one of them.
derbigpr500 11 months ago
@derbigpr500 By making this post, you make it very clear to me that you have never attended a driving school or ever had an instructor show you proper technique. Suspension has more to do with acceleration including dampers and ride height than the driver impacts straight line speed. Sign up for a 2 day skip barber class and you will see (as I did). You're probably granny shiftin, not double clutchin like ya should BRIAN SPILLNER!
scoobydawg04 11 months ago
forthy liters per a hundred kilometers? OMFG!
negrozn2 1 year ago
I love Audi!!!!!!!!
ruskiroma 1 year ago
our RS4 is much faster :)
AxelGott600 1 year ago
you guys are just trollin because you dont have one. mad probs caspers
zcla42892 1 year ago
@zcla42892 right. check my uploads
alexrex20 1 year ago
This is not audi S4.This is a4!!!!!!
Guerrini85 1 year ago
my original audi a4 b5 is faster than that and it sound better ;)
8rx7rx 1 year ago
Its not
mkuroglu 1 year ago
0-100 km/h võiks olla
jokaone1 2 years ago
tahad ma võin teha :D
Rauno1983 2 years ago
AAAHHH listen to that german V8 scream
vincent4492 2 years ago 29
@vincent4492 its a beautiful thing to wake up to in the morning...
youdog12345 7 months ago
ignore the POS comment, that was not me, it was my friends just playing because i drive the same vehicle.
carryxxxon 2 years ago 2
If you floor an automatic Audi in drive it will shift right before 7,000.
poormilk 2 years ago
This car really should perform better considering the size of its engine...
hydrake 2 years ago
@hydrake
The size of an engine doesn't mean much, it's all about power. You can have a 5 liter engine producing 200 hp and a 2 liter engine producing 300 hp.
lfsracer79 2 years ago
@lfsracer79
some people just don't get this idea. And not only is your comment correct, but the kind of car and weight comes into play. So according to hydrake, an eighteen wheeler should be way faster due to the size of its engine??
dubgli 2 years ago
@dubgli good way to put it in.But a semi will haul a house up the hill thats what its made for alot of torque
nawzy202 1 year ago
@hydrake you have to consider the fact that the quattro make that the engine lost about 20% of the horsepower through the drivetrain so the v8 engine make 340bhp.. at wheel it would be about 272whp
Ian905 2 years ago
driving like a dog walker
Enderwiggan1 2 years ago
AudiDriver989 did you not see the comment that the video poster put up stating IT IS a manual.
skateozzy 2 years ago
POS
carryxxxon 2 years ago
it sounds like the rs4 b7
lucaselsa 2 years ago
Comment removed
olejukb 2 years ago
Those gears are REALLY close.
ohgah42 2 years ago
oh yes audi power :X:X
TheAudirs6 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wie lahm ist das denn, peinlich
karlmalar 2 years ago
obviously manual, automatic doesnt change gears at 7000rpm.
RaymondBarreto 2 years ago
obviously your an idiot and dont drive an Audi RaymondBarreto. Those shifts where way to smooth for a manual car. Its Automatic he was prolly using the tiptronic feature at the time.
AudiDriver989 2 years ago
Tiptronic would display what gear you're in on the on the multifunction display
fitch303 2 years ago
raymond im afraid your wrong there from a tiptronic and yes it does change at 7000rpm
dualmono21 2 years ago
Kommt mir irgendwie ziemlich lahm vor für einen V8!!
Swakopmund11 2 years ago
Comment removed
ssemeno 2 years ago
mir auch
marquis0r 2 years ago
Automatic or manual?
maciej21xxx 2 years ago
Comment removed
pavlothebitch 3 years ago
Yes it is!
dualcoreandbmw 3 years ago 2
The older B5 S4 had the 2.7 bi-turbo engine, but this B6 has the 4.2 V8.
SgSpecial180 3 years ago
of course is V8, please listen
tequimex1 2 years ago
that's impressive! wish i had a vehicle capable of that
BecomeMore 3 years ago
jaa ne is klar dein golf is schneller als der s4 hier in dem video , noch nichtmal ein 6 zylinder golf kommt gegen den an
Rollerfahrer666 3 years ago
Sie sagen, ok
tequimex1 2 years ago
My dad has that car
GoldenElmo 3 years ago
he would
Bogdewicz 3 years ago
Who wouldn't want one? It's a nice car.
Cordius 3 years ago
Ok? And your point?
Zlyzer 3 years ago
Schafft mein Golf auch...
3. Gang bei Hundert... Klasse Beschleunigung wenn er von vornherein bei 6000-7000 Umdrehungen ist...
JaegerlieNyo 3 years ago
Was ist du auto? Ich spechen Sie Deutsch nicht so gut.
dbackbmx 3 years ago
I´m not a car...
I said thats not realy great if it starts with the 3 gear and 100 km/h and 6000 rounds...
JaegerlieNyo 3 years ago
Well shit sorry i was trying to ask what kind of car you got. Im slowly trying to learn german on my own. I even told you i speak german not so good.
dbackbmx 3 years ago
loooooooooool! xD
shroeda 3 years ago
...jap muss ig sagen!
für nen v8 is dat nen bissel arm!
also mein Mv6 ging genauso wenn nich sogar noch schneller!
shroeda 3 years ago
my cuz had 1 and every time i went out with him in it i begged him 2 put his foot down so i cud hear the v8 lol
mayweatherrulz 3 years ago 2
Sounds good, man. :)
Cordius 3 years ago
gotta love that v8 sound!!
jak4calibrah 3 years ago 16
Nope, its a manual. It goes as smooth as an auto, but much faster ;-)
Caspers4 3 years ago 3
@Caspers4 nobody can shift faster than an automatic
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 LMAOOO
NERD585 1 year ago
@alexrex20 U mean sequential transmission with 2 or 3 clutches then u are right but not a reglar automatic how about a 2 speed glider
nawzy202 1 year ago
@nawzy202 no, i don't. why do you think they use automatics in drag racing? they shift faster and they don't miss gears.
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 that is a completely false statement. It all depends on the car you have. Yes a Lamborghini with the dual clutch auto will shift faster than the manual, but in the b6 S4, no the auto is slower.
cvinc17 1 year ago
@cvinc17 you know nothing about cars, specifically transmissions if you think a human shifting a shift lever is faster than ANY automatic transmission. there's a reason why they're used in drag racing.
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 the reason they are used in drag racing is because they are typically stronger and can handle the torque of the car, not because they shift fast. You obviously know less than nothing if you can even consider the possibility that automatics are all faster than manuals. You obviously have never driven any one model vehicle that had both transmission options. There is a reason that most autos are slower accelerating than their manual counterparts. Look it up, you might learn something.
cvinc17 1 year ago
@cvinc17 the reason that the automatic is slower than its manual counterpart is because the automatic will typically have less gears and thus taller gear ratios. try harder next time. when you finally have some facts to qualify your statements, get back to me.
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 no that is not the case at all, you cant generalize transmissions with that statement. many new or recent cars have shorter geared 7 or even 8 speed automatics which are still slower than their 6 speed manual counterparts, a great example being the 2010 Audi S4. Don't believe me? look it up or ask around, you will be told the same thing i am telling you. So nope you're wrong again, and as for trying harder, i don't need to, you are making this easy for me with your lack of knowledge.
cvinc17 1 year ago
@cvinc17 with the 2010 S4, manufacturer claims and empirical date from 3rd parties show identical 0-60mph times with EITHER transmission. we can then deduce that the 7-speed automatic has 1 extra shift compared to the 6-speed manual, though it still achieves the same 0-60mph time.
you are still wrong. please try harder. like i said, please give me some FACTS to qualify your statements. check out dictionary-dot-com for the definition of "facts."
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 no im not wrong, and anyone else that knows cars will tell you the same thing and will agree with me if you asked them. I am sorry you feel that you are correct in this debate. How about i give you another example the bmw 335xi, which i know for a fact is slower 0-60 in auto form and i know for a fact shifts slower than i can row through the gears of its manual counterpart, its called personal experience. No need to try harder like i said, i dont need to.
cvinc17 1 year ago
@alexrex20 also as far as i have reviewed, the 0-60 of the auto is .3 seconds slower from 3rd party reviews. and saying "we can then deduce" is like saying we can then "assume". As far as my example goes it was only intended to prove to you that the gears are shorter in some automatics then in manuals, but some still dont accelerate any faster. Again your overall claims that generalize automatics shifting faster than manuals is false. In some cases it may be true, but over all, it is false.
cvinc17 1 year ago
@cvinc17 nice back tracking. :rolleyes:
you'll forgive me when i say your "personal experience" doesn't mean shit. show me hard date - which you can't - and maybe i'll start taking you seriously. until then, keep talking out of your ass. keep offering up examples, only to be countered by me, so you can then say, "it was only intended to..."
give me a break. you fail.
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 I fail? no the failure here is you and your inability to comprehend when you are wrong and have no clue what you are talking about. Back tracking? not even close. And the reason i offer examples is so you will learn the facts that you wanted so badly. There was none of your countering to them either, just your bias non-experienced opinion. You truly lack the common knowledge, experience, and maturity to be considered an automotive enthusiast. You probably don't even have a license.
cvinc17 1 year ago
Respond to this video... Just admit you are wrong and give up, it will save you the embarrassment from when other viewers review your comments and scoff with hilarity. You're making a fool out of yourself with your falsified, opinionated statements that hold no value.
cvinc17 1 year ago
@cvinc17 opinionated statements? you give examples. i prove them wrong. you give more examples. i again prove them wrong. keep fishing.
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 No actually, I am quite positive that you have not managed to even come close to proving any of my examples wrong. Still fishing? I have already won the derby.
cvinc17 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cvinc17 you said, "many new or recent cars have shorter geared 7 or even 8 speed automatics which are still slower than their 6 speed manual counterparts, a great example being the 2010 Audi S4."
sorry, you're wrong. Audi and third-party reviewers test the 2010 Audi S4 to achieve identical 0-60mph times with either the automatic or manual.
yep, that's a "great example."
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20 Wrong, actually manuals have much less rotational mass than an automatic slush box therefore the power is delivered much more efficiently.
hw454 1 year ago
@hw454 that still doesn't mean you can shift a manual faster than an automatic. try again.
alexrex20 1 year ago
@alexrex20
I'm pretty sure you're just jealous because you don't know how to drive stick, so you have made an entire case based around the fact that "autos are faster" so that you won't look as bad.
FAIL
924Carrera 10 months ago
@alexrex20
Also, you are right in that many automatics (not just the dual clutch stuff) do shift considerably faster than any driver can manually. However, the ACCELERATION of the car is usually slower because more power is lost through the fluid coupling of an automatic transmission than through the direct mechanical geartrain of a manual. True paddle shift setups such as Ferrari uses are actually manuals with electrohydraulic clutches, NOT automatics with torque converters.
924Carrera 10 months ago
@hw454 Interesting theory thats would be correct, if we were in 1980's. Todays automatic transmission with double clutch systems shift faster than any man could do, and do VERY smoothly, so you dont physicaly feel the shift at all, you just hear the sound of the engine changing. Take a ride in any new european car with double clutch gearbox and you'll see how much faster it is than manual. Example, VW Golf GTI with manual vs DGS gearbox. DSG = better acceleration, better fuel efficiency.
derbigpr500 11 months ago
@Caspers4 i wouldn't bet on a manual against a DSG ...
FLOYDROCKSSS 8 months ago
manual i think
0290754770 3 years ago
is this a manual or auto? shifts were so smooth it seems like an auto.
jlgroovetek 3 years ago