it will be such an accomplishment once the Nsx can hang with the AWD Legends (Cyber, HKS, Tomei/Cusco) considering it can't deal with too much torque unlike the Suby's and Evo's
@cdawg1113 they don't really enter to make money in time attack, a mostly their after the bragging rights, being able to say that you hold a long withstanding lap record around a track is quite a powerful tool (BTW: most of the money comes from the sponsors)
@arrancooper69 No, most of the high performance time attack cars are in the pro class but the street legal racing is in a different class. Besides have you ever heard those things in real life? There's no way they reach the acceptable noise limit for street cars.
@somerandomaussie yes but the NS record is a GT500 car worth close too a million$ the HKS evo fastest 4wd car is about 1/4 of that price. you throw enough money at any car and it will be fast. just 4wd car dont need as much money development to go as fast as RWD
@nipponbaka interestingly enuf tho the arta nsx and the hks evo have similar power figures (i think the nsx is limited to 500ps) makes me think how the nsx could be 2 sec faster considering the tuning and chassis work that has gone into the hks evo
@somerandomaussie like I said nsx runs full slicks much wider tyres and brakes are much larger. basically if you spent as much on the evo as goes into a gt500 car youd have a car just as fast probably faster since the evo is turbo.
@nipponbaka the hks evo is worth atleast 500k since is body is completly hand crafted dry carbon fibre which isnt cheap...the gt500 cars are turbo aswell and the brakes on the evo compared to the nsx wouldnt be to far off it comes down to the tires the evo uses semi slicks where as the jgtc nsx uses full slicks which would make the 1-2 sec difference....shows how fast the evo really is compared to a full race car on slicks :)
@nipponbaka yea i was gonna attend the superlap challenge but i wasnt able to travel to sydney from where i live...im surprised hks didnt turn up considerin they are almost 1 second faster than the cyber evo at tsubaka which won the event ahead of sierra sierra..even after blowing there engine and having to borrow a spare...and build and fit in in under 11 hours
The bodywork is the FXMD widebody that includes front bumper, front fenders, side skirt, rear 1/4 panels, and optional hood and trunklid. The front fenders won't align with the stock front bumper. Shoot me an email or check out NSXPrime for more info.
I have this car at STMPO right now. it is being converted to run e-85. the roll cage is in the works as well as maximum chassis support. we are shedding POUNDS AND POUNDS off this car.. this car has 8 track records, and soon will be shattering it's own plus other records!!! KEEP AN EYE ON BILLY AND THIS CAR!!!
Titanium Rods, Magnesium Valvecovers, a pioneer in variable valve timing in a production car, one of the first cars with an all aluminum chassis, faster/better than a 348 in almost every regard forcing Ferrari to build faster/better cars, it has its place in history. Yes the 280hp 'gentlemens agreement' is pathetic by today's standards. That's what a turbo is for ;)
it just seems to me the biggest problem with the NSX is its just a stock v6 accord power train put on a really good chassis and way over priced. Or that was the problem when it came out. Had honda taken it serious and priced it right it could have been a Ferrari, Porsche and Nissan GTR killer but it wasn't even close for the money to a GTR nor a Porsche or a Ferrari
What confuses me is Honda himself was into racing so why didn't they make it much faster?
my 3.2 NSX does to 60 in 4.6 and 12.9 on the 1/4 mile, stock, that is not "slow" by any means + it drives like a 130K + car and it looks like a proper sportscar (not a PIG with 600HP) ... take in consideration that my year model is already 12 years old and outruns 99% of the cars out there ... is pretty remarkable .....
ya but what was the msrp when it was new plus it had to be special ordered it was more expensive than a 9/11 with less performance it didn't come close to Ferrari in anything it doesn't really out perform or outlast a GTR which cost half as much.
I actually really like NSXs but I was just complaining why didn't Honda make them much faster especially for the price. I'm not too surprised they are so rare because if you bought a new one you paid way too much.
infact I would have rather have gotten a RX7 for the money I could have replaced the engine a couple of times. But I can build the engine my self also so...
I agree with you, I mean @ 84K the power wasn't that great, but think about how the 348 was the ferrari to "beat" and it took ferrari all the way to the F360 to have a "better" car -the Honda still will drive 300K miles- and those cars were way above 84K ....
NSX's been so old and been so capable only shows how great they are, weight reduction (- 200lb's arent that impossible) + a Supercharger u have a great car, leave alone FI -turbo- if raw HP is your thing, NSX's are not the ones to pick.
I'd love to get my hands on one and get it upto 500hp I think thats about right for the handling and the look of the car and since most Nissan's can handle that and be daily reliable I'd imagine if built right so could the 3.2 honda.
I mean people put 500hp outta the 90s vg30dett and drive it daily and they last a really long time same with the vqs (jat) depending on how often you take it and beat it on a track.
yea, the nsx would have had better reliability and upkeep over the 355, but considering the step up from a nsx to a 355, the reliability and upkeep are an acceptable trade off.
Nsx fan boys will defend till the day they die, but there are some comparisons that are just laughable..
WILL YA DRIVE THE FUCKIN THING!!!!
jimmyreape 4 months ago
it will be such an accomplishment once the Nsx can hang with the AWD Legends (Cyber, HKS, Tomei/Cusco) considering it can't deal with too much torque unlike the Suby's and Evo's
ddontforgett 5 months ago
wow!!!
JRG660 8 months ago
DAT SPOILER
unknown3d 8 months ago
I'd like to see this NSX vs Cyber Evo
borys1brytva 8 months ago
8 years?!?!
loyalFX 1 year ago
dude redline time attack makes no money all these guys racing there arejust rich kids whose daddies can loose 200k a year no problem
cdawg1113 1 year ago
@cdawg1113 they don't really enter to make money in time attack, a mostly their after the bragging rights, being able to say that you hold a long withstanding lap record around a track is quite a powerful tool (BTW: most of the money comes from the sponsors)
tiger0tank 1 year ago 3
@cdawg1113 lolumad?
OMGItsWeasel 1 year ago
@cdawg1113 yeah to that, or shops field cars
cj7283 11 months ago
Time Attack Cars have to be road legal and this has racing slicks, what's up with that??
arrancooper69 1 year ago
@arrancooper69 No, most of the high performance time attack cars are in the pro class but the street legal racing is in a different class. Besides have you ever heard those things in real life? There's no way they reach the acceptable noise limit for street cars.
SinclairDeluxe 1 year ago
ARBs seem to be very soft! A lot of bodyroll
RacingPhilNici 1 year ago
Those CCW Wheels are soooo sexy!!!
Filipinoborn 1 year ago
damn nice jordans
johntran 1 year ago
coming in flat black for this year :)
srbskalegija 1 year ago
everyone says evos are best time attack cars but isnt the tsukuba lap record held by a nsx?
somerandomaussie 1 year ago
@somerandomaussie yes but the NS record is a GT500 car worth close too a million$ the HKS evo fastest 4wd car is about 1/4 of that price. you throw enough money at any car and it will be fast. just 4wd car dont need as much money development to go as fast as RWD
nipponbaka 1 year ago
@nipponbaka interestingly enuf tho the arta nsx and the hks evo have similar power figures (i think the nsx is limited to 500ps) makes me think how the nsx could be 2 sec faster considering the tuning and chassis work that has gone into the hks evo
somerandomaussie 1 year ago
@somerandomaussie like I said nsx runs full slicks much wider tyres and brakes are much larger. basically if you spent as much on the evo as goes into a gt500 car youd have a car just as fast probably faster since the evo is turbo.
nipponbaka 1 year ago
@nipponbaka the hks evo is worth atleast 500k since is body is completly hand crafted dry carbon fibre which isnt cheap...the gt500 cars are turbo aswell and the brakes on the evo compared to the nsx wouldnt be to far off it comes down to the tires the evo uses semi slicks where as the jgtc nsx uses full slicks which would make the 1-2 sec difference....shows how fast the evo really is compared to a full race car on slicks :)
somerandomaussie 1 year ago
@somerandomaussie yep and the 4WD cars cleaned up again at the World time attack on the weekend in Sydney
nipponbaka 1 year ago
@nipponbaka yea i was gonna attend the superlap challenge but i wasnt able to travel to sydney from where i live...im surprised hks didnt turn up considerin they are almost 1 second faster than the cyber evo at tsubaka which won the event ahead of sierra sierra..even after blowing there engine and having to borrow a spare...and build and fit in in under 11 hours
somerandomaussie 1 year ago
Can I put the Wide Front Fender with just the stock front bumper? I just want the wider looking side and back...
anyways what kind of body kit is that> will that be available?
supertrex2 1 year ago
The bodywork is the FXMD widebody that includes front bumper, front fenders, side skirt, rear 1/4 panels, and optional hood and trunklid. The front fenders won't align with the stock front bumper. Shoot me an email or check out NSXPrime for more info.
71stuntman71 1 year ago
too much talking
giriphotography 2 years ago
I have this car at STMPO right now. it is being converted to run e-85. the roll cage is in the works as well as maximum chassis support. we are shedding POUNDS AND POUNDS off this car.. this car has 8 track records, and soon will be shattering it's own plus other records!!! KEEP AN EYE ON BILLY AND THIS CAR!!!
sinisterfabwerx 2 years ago
Comment removed
sinisterfabwerx 2 years ago
epic video, im impressed.
zextreme47 2 years ago
This is the baddest nsx in the world
Paganiproductions 2 years ago 17
@Paganiproductions No man.. Check out what JM Imports have on pistonheads!! Now thats badass
GtstTypeM 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey, Great Video! We would love to have it on our site. Come check us out at C-A-R-C-O-M-M-U-N-I-T-I-E-S-d-o-t-C-O-M.
Make sure to sign up for an account and upload your video! See ya there ;)
sidditalees 2 years ago
the rear wing is so high..
anjingkepala3 2 years ago
this car is extreme-o-built... understated in this video
eeeen321 2 years ago
Decent car, boring as shit video though.
z31club 2 years ago
Titanium Rods, Magnesium Valvecovers, a pioneer in variable valve timing in a production car, one of the first cars with an all aluminum chassis, faster/better than a 348 in almost every regard forcing Ferrari to build faster/better cars, it has its place in history. Yes the 280hp 'gentlemens agreement' is pathetic by today's standards. That's what a turbo is for ;)
71stuntman71 2 years ago
the car comes with a bunch of bitches ;)
SmoootHman 2 years ago
it just seems to me the biggest problem with the NSX is its just a stock v6 accord power train put on a really good chassis and way over priced. Or that was the problem when it came out. Had honda taken it serious and priced it right it could have been a Ferrari, Porsche and Nissan GTR killer but it wasn't even close for the money to a GTR nor a Porsche or a Ferrari
What confuses me is Honda himself was into racing so why didn't they make it much faster?
arabrockerman 2 years ago
Japanese "gentlemens agreement" ,it means that no road car can have more than 280BHP...
RenaultSport133 2 years ago
my 3.2 NSX does to 60 in 4.6 and 12.9 on the 1/4 mile, stock, that is not "slow" by any means + it drives like a 130K + car and it looks like a proper sportscar (not a PIG with 600HP) ... take in consideration that my year model is already 12 years old and outruns 99% of the cars out there ... is pretty remarkable .....
Nsx's are nor for everyone though.
oscardriver 2 years ago
ya but what was the msrp when it was new plus it had to be special ordered it was more expensive than a 9/11 with less performance it didn't come close to Ferrari in anything it doesn't really out perform or outlast a GTR which cost half as much.
I actually really like NSXs but I was just complaining why didn't Honda make them much faster especially for the price. I'm not too surprised they are so rare because if you bought a new one you paid way too much.
arabrockerman 2 years ago
infact I would have rather have gotten a RX7 for the money I could have replaced the engine a couple of times. But I can build the engine my self also so...
arabrockerman 2 years ago
I agree with you, I mean @ 84K the power wasn't that great, but think about how the 348 was the ferrari to "beat" and it took ferrari all the way to the F360 to have a "better" car -the Honda still will drive 300K miles- and those cars were way above 84K ....
NSX's been so old and been so capable only shows how great they are, weight reduction (- 200lb's arent that impossible) + a Supercharger u have a great car, leave alone FI -turbo- if raw HP is your thing, NSX's are not the ones to pick.
oscardriver 2 years ago
But yeah, NSX's are the car you must love/appreciate for what they are, not for what they aren't !
In my case I love most sports cars :D
oscardriver 2 years ago
Yep totally agree with you.
I'd love to get my hands on one and get it upto 500hp I think thats about right for the handling and the look of the car and since most Nissan's can handle that and be daily reliable I'd imagine if built right so could the 3.2 honda.
I mean people put 500hp outta the 90s vg30dett and drive it daily and they last a really long time same with the vqs (jat) depending on how often you take it and beat it on a track.
arabrockerman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the 355 is better in every way than a same year nsx ..
the nsx is what made Ferrari go so extreme from the 348 to the 355.....
eeeen321 2 years ago
Comment removed
71stuntman71 2 years ago
yea, the nsx would have had better reliability and upkeep over the 355, but considering the step up from a nsx to a 355, the reliability and upkeep are an acceptable trade off.
Nsx fan boys will defend till the day they die, but there are some comparisons that are just laughable..
eeeen321 2 years ago
Nsx's are one of the best cars ever selled !
kaicos 2 years ago
@kaicos
it sucked that it was barely sold tho
because of it honda stopped making it
honda stopped making good cars in gerneral
fastest cars that honda have now is the civic and rsx and they dont even have 200 hp stock
NikkoThePinoi 1 year ago
@kaicos sold?
Fallingup899 1 year ago
@kaicos u mean sold....
ToyotaGT1Racer 1 year ago
HOLY wing
lamp7002 2 years ago
It's a race car
oscardriver 2 years ago
I love this car, but I still think the wing is overkill.
fpsraab 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
can you reupload this in HD, cuz this VID LOOKS SHITTY AS FUCK!
JulioCHernandez 2 years ago
It looks good to me. Its still processing
MadHatter52190 2 years ago
Hahaha
lm108 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im liking the cricket sponsors. my friend owns 14 stores in philly, chicago, and milwaukee
DanDaMan262498 2 years ago
Then he owes my wife money.
madjimms 2 years ago
oh snap, nice... lol.
PrescriptionSeven 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
first comment:) nice video 5/5
EdGeEmpire 2 years ago