What about simply throwing a spot-light on the log? It seems the vast majority of these type videos require an enormous leap of faith for the viewers to even consider the possibility of a BF much less conclude it's one. Current technology with forensics, audio/video, GPS/tracking, etc.-researchers would be prepared for almost anything. If there were two hairy beasts sitting behind that log-surely some hair would remain-right? Just one hair. How about saliva, urine or feces in the area?
Creepy. You were definitely being peeked at, and it wasn't deer.
And NO I wouldn't walk up on the log to investigate. If Mr. and Mrs. Stinky were he-in' and she-in' they might not appreciate the coitus interruptus, and they might tear something off that I can't spare.
so? all this shows is that a bigfoot hunter is afraid to walk up to a log and friggin look. this is more agrivating than interesting, what are you afraid of? you are there to find a bigfoot, walk up to it and introduce yourself or just stay home where its safe.
@jda1961 Yeah seriously. If you're out there in the evening like anyone else camping, you should've known from early childhood that there's nothing out there to be scared of and that they are usually more scared of us than we are of them. Not to mention hunting a mythical beast.
It seems to me the question about what it was could have been answered simply by approaching that log with the thermal running. Is there a reason why they did not do that? Just curious, thats all.
get a life and quit trying to rape your own sisters in the forest with thermal cameras its just sick you hillbilly fucks
drewone08 2 months ago
Nada!
moleman1961 4 months ago
yet again shows nothing...run at it and prove once and for all...
thedemonunderyourbed 1 year ago
What about simply throwing a spot-light on the log? It seems the vast majority of these type videos require an enormous leap of faith for the viewers to even consider the possibility of a BF much less conclude it's one. Current technology with forensics, audio/video, GPS/tracking, etc.-researchers would be prepared for almost anything. If there were two hairy beasts sitting behind that log-surely some hair would remain-right? Just one hair. How about saliva, urine or feces in the area?
elvez1231 1 year ago
i thouht BFG stood for big fucking gun
ScamKAM 1 year ago
don't see a thing
t2bone3 1 year ago
Creepy. You were definitely being peeked at, and it wasn't deer.
And NO I wouldn't walk up on the log to investigate. If Mr. and Mrs. Stinky were he-in' and she-in' they might not appreciate the coitus interruptus, and they might tear something off that I can't spare.
HOUNDDAWG 1 year ago
what the hell are we suppose to be looking at?
scarypowers 1 year ago 4
okay at first when i saw the text in the vid i did a quick turn i thought it said "sex beihind a log" roflmao.
Dano78229 1 year ago
so? all this shows is that a bigfoot hunter is afraid to walk up to a log and friggin look. this is more agrivating than interesting, what are you afraid of? you are there to find a bigfoot, walk up to it and introduce yourself or just stay home where its safe.
jda1961 2 years ago 12
@jda1961 Yeah seriously. If you're out there in the evening like anyone else camping, you should've known from early childhood that there's nothing out there to be scared of and that they are usually more scared of us than we are of them. Not to mention hunting a mythical beast.
calcmandan 10 months ago
Riveting
derekfoot 2 years ago
Can't see a damn thing, maybe enhance and zoom the video?
Alimistar 2 years ago
shit. why dont you go over to the log, get a flash light and shine it on the damn thang
tonyagrestic 2 years ago 8
Comment removed
belene2 2 years ago
It seems to me the question about what it was could have been answered simply by approaching that log with the thermal running. Is there a reason why they did not do that? Just curious, thats all.
monstaquest 2 years ago 10
@monstaquest I agree.
redchun 2 years ago
Sorry, but I couldn't see a damn thing.
rjdalchow 2 years ago 8